Open Access

Different patterns of NF-κB and Notch1 signaling contribute to tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

  • Chunhua Su1,
  • Zhenguang Chen1Email author,
  • Honghe Luo1,
  • Yihua Su2,
  • Wangkai Liu3,
  • Lie Cai4,
  • Tao Wang5,
  • Yiyan Lei1 and
  • Beilong Zhong6
Contributed equally
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201130:85

DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-85

Received: 16 June 2011

Accepted: 22 September 2011

Published: 22 September 2011

Abstract

Background

Lymph node involvement and tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis appear as the earliest features of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), although the molecular regulatory mechanisms involved have remained unclear. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of NF-κB and Notch1 signaling to lymph node involvement and tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis in ESCC.

Material and methods

NF-κB and Notch1 expression in 60 tissue samples of ESCC were assessed by immunohistochemical staining. The correlations of NF-κB and Notch1 with lymph node involvement, lymphatic vessel density (LVD), podoplanin, and vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) were further evaluated to determine the association of NF-κB and Notch1 expression with tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis.

Results

Chi-square tests revealed that NF-κB and Notch1 expression in ESCC tissues were significant associated with lymph node metastasis, LVD, podoplanin, and VEGF-C expression. Strong expression of NF-κB, but weak expression of Notch1, was observed in tumor tissues with lymph nodes involvement (P < 0.05 for both). The mean histoscores of LVD, podoplanin, and VEGF-C staining were higher in high-NF-κB-expressing tissue than in low-expressing tissue (P < 0.05 for each). In contrast, the mean histoscores of LVD and VEGF-C staining were lower in high-Notch1-expressing tissue than in low-expressing tissue (P < 0.05 for both). A multiple factors analysis of LVD and VEGF-C further demonstrated that LVD and VEGF-C status were significantly correlated with NF-κB and Notch1 expression in tumors. NF-κB and Notch1 expression were also significantly inversely correlated (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

These results suggest that different patterns of NF-κB and Notch1 signaling contribute to lymph nodes metastasis and tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis of ESCC, and reveal that up-regulation of NF-κB is associated with down-regulation of Notch1 in tumor tissue.

Keywords

esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Notch NF-κB angiogenesis lymphangiogenesis

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most aggressive and invasive malignancies in the world. Despite combined modality approaches, the prognosis in cases of ESCC remains extremely poor; patients exhibit a low 5-year survival rate, with the majority of cancer-related deaths resulting from metastatic spread of tumor cells [1]. Clinical observations have shown that lymph node involvement appears as one of the earliest features of ESCC [2]. Some abnormal molecular biology changes, such as tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis, are also considered to play a central role in the migration and metastatic spread of ESCC to lymph nodes. For example, high expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C and the presence of newly developed lymphatic ducts was found to be the main avenue for dissemination of malignant cells to lymph nodes in ESCC [35]. Lymphangiogenesis is associated with neoplastic progression in the esophageal mucosa, and there is an increase in VEGF-C expression in Barrett's epithelium as it progresses through dysplasia to esophageal carcinoma [6]. Moreover, lymphangiogenesis has been shown to correlate with the depth of malignant invasion, tumor stage, lymphatic and venous invasion, and lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer [7].

However, although several positive and negative regulators, including angiopoietins [8], neuropilin-2 [9], and COX-2 [10], are believed to contribute to the robust production of VEGF-C, the molecular regulatory mechanisms involved in tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis of ESCC have remained unclear. One potential candidate is nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), a sequence-specific transcription factor that responds to cellular signaling pathways involved in cell survival and resistance to chemotherapy; notably, aberrant NF-κB activation has been associated with some malignancies [1113]. Although abnormities of NF-κB signaling have been reported to play an important role in carcinogenesis by promoting tumor-induced angiogenesis and neoplastic proliferation [14], the association of NF-κB with lymphangiogenesis in ESCC is less clear. Members of the Notch family of cell surface receptors and their ligands also warrant attention based on their role in vasculogenesis and their potential to act as oncogenes in the pathogenesis of certain carcinomas. These highly conserved proteins regulate "decisions" involved in cell-fate determination, including those involved in mammalian vascular development [15]. The finding that genes of the Notch signaling cascade are robustly expressed in the vasculature suggests that Notch signaling guides endothelial cells and associated mural cells through the cell-fate decisions needed to form and maintain the vascular system [16]. Although Notch signaling anomalies are found in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, cervical cancer and neuroblastoma, consistent with the presumed oncogenic role of Notch signaling during tumorigenesis, the finding that Notch signaling is diminished in epithelial squamous cell carcinoma of the skin would seem to suggest that Notch might serve as a tumor suppressor. These apparently contradictory functions of Notch signaling strongly indicate that the outcome of Notch activation is dependent on malignant cellular context [17].

Given the uncertain contributions of differential NF-κB and Notch signaling to tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis of ESCC, we here assessed the expression of NF-κB and Notch1 in ESCC tissues and evaluated their association with various clinical characteristics, including sex, age, lymph node metastasis, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, and differentiation (well, moderate, or poor grade) of tumor cells in ESCC. Lymphangiogenetic characteristics and their associations with NF-κB and Notch1 signaling were also measured to determine the contribution of NF-κB and Notch signaling to tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis.

Materials and Methods

Patients and specimens

A total of 60 ESCC tissue samples excised from January 2004 to December 2006 were selected from the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. All patients were treated by esophagectomy and did not receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery. Clinical information was obtained through reviews of preoperative and perioperative medical records, or telephone or written correspondence. These cases were classified according to the Health Organization criteria (TNM system) and staged appropriately. The study has been approved by the hospital ethical committee and each subject had signed the written informed consent.

Pathological grading

Paraffin-embedded specimens of each case were collected, and 5-mm thick tissue sections were cut and fixed onto siliconized slides. The histopathology of each sample was studied using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The same sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated with deionized water. Samples were stained with hematoxylin for 5 min and ablated with 1% hydrochloric acid alcohol for 30 s then immersed in distilled water for 15 min. Slides were stained with 0.5% eosin for 2 min, then dehydrated, immersed in xylene for 15 min, and mounted. All specimens were evaluated with respect to histological subtype, differentiation, and tumor stage according to World Health Organization criteria. Tumor size and metastatic lymph node number and locations were obtained from pathology reports.

Immunohistochemical staining

Immunohistochemical staining was carried out using the streptavidin-peroxidase method. Briefly, each tissue section was deparaffinized, rehydrated, and then incubated with fresh 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in methanol for 15 min. After rinsing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), antigen retrieval was carried out by incubating at 100°C for 15 min in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) using a microwave oven. Next, non-specific binding was blocked by incubating with normal goat serum for 15 min at room temperature, followed by incubation at 4°C overnight with anti-NF-κB antibody (sc-8008, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-Notch1 antibody (sc-6014-R, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-VEGF-C antibody (18-2255, 1:100; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), anti-VEGFR-3 antibody (MAB3757, 1:150; Chemicon, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and/or anti-podoplanin antibody (sc-59347, 1:100; Chemicon, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). After rinsing with PBS, slides were incubated for 10 min at room temperature with biotin-conjugated secondary antibodies, followed by incubation with a streptavidin-conjugated peroxidase working solution for 10 min. Subsequently, sections were stained for 3-5 min with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB), counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. Negative controls were prepared by substituting PBS for primary antibody.

Assessment of immunohistochemical staining

Nuclear staining of NF-κB and cytoplasmic staining of Notch1 and VEGF-C were scored in this study. The intensity of NF-κB, Notch1, podoplanin, and/or VEGF-C staining was score on a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0, negative; 1, light; 2, moderate; and 3, intense. The percentage of positive tumor cells at each intensity level was presented as a ratio of the percentage of surface area covered at each intensity score to total tumor cell area. Areas that were negative were given a value of 0. We analyzed 10-12 discrete foci in each section and generated an average stain intensity and percentage of surface area covered. The final histoscore was calculated using the formula, histoscore = (1 × percentage of weakly positive tumor cells) + (2 × percentage of moderately positive tumor cells) + (3 × percentage of intensely positive tumor cells). The histoscore was determined independently by two investigators by microscopic examination (magnification, × 400). If the histoscores determined by the two investigators differed by more than 15%, a recount was taken to reach an agreement. NF-κB, Notch1, podoplanin, and VEGF-C expression were classified into high- and low-expressing groups, using the median value of their respective histoscores as a cut-off value.

Evaluation of LVD

Immunohistochemical reactions for VEGFR-3 antigen were evaluated independently by two investigators using a microscope. The three most vascularized areas within a tumor ("hot spots") were chosen at low magnification (× 40), and vessels in a representative high-magnification (× 400; 0.152 mm2; 0.44-mm diameter) field in each of these three areas were counted. The high-magnification fields were then marked for subsequent image cytometric analysis. Single immunoreactive endothelial cells or endothelial cell clusters separated from other micro-lymphatic vessels were counted as individual micro-lymphatic vessels. Endothelial staining in large vessels with tunica media and nonspecific staining of non-endothelial structures were excluded in micro-lymphatic vessels counts. The mean visual micro-lymphatic vessel density of VEFGR-3 staining was calculated as the average of six counts (two hot spots and three microscopic fields). Micro-lymphatic vessel counts higher than the median micro-lymphatic vessel count were taken as high LVD, and those that were lower than the median were taken as low LVD.

Statistical analysis

All calculations were done using the statistical software SPSS V.14.0 (Chicago, Illinois, USA). Data were shown as mean ± standard deviation. Spearman's coefficient of correlation, Chi-squared tests, and Mann-Whitney tests were used as appropriate. A multivariate model using logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate statistical associations among variables. For all tests, a two-sided P-value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. Hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed to provide quantitative information about the relevance of the results of the statistical analysis.

Results

Basic clinical information and tumor characteristics

Forty-six male and 14 female patients (mean age, 57.6 ± 10.4 years; range, 36-79 years) with ESCC treated by curative surgical resection were enrolled in the study. Of the 60 tumors, 15 were well differentiated, 27 were moderately differentiated, and 18 were poorly differentiated. Using the TNM staging system of the International Union Against Cancer (2009) [18], cases were classified as stage I (n = 9), stage II (n = 11), and stage III (n = 40). Twenty-four of 60 patients had lymph node metastasis, according to surgery and pathology reports. Patient data were analyzed after a 5-year follow-up; information was obtained in 91.7% (55 of 60) of cases. The median overall survival was 26.9 ± 2.7 months (95% CI: 21.4-31.9 months), and the mean overall survival was 38.1 ± 6.5 months (95% CI: 27.6-52.0 months). The clinical characteristics of study samples are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Association of NF-κB and Notch1 expression with clinical characteristics

Clinicopathological feature

NF-κB expression

P- value

Notch1 expression

P-value

 

High

Low

 

High

Low

 

Gender

      
 

Male

21

25

0.451

22

24

0.887

 

Female

8

6

 

7

7

 

Age (years)

      
 

≤ 60

17

23

0.201

23

17

0.058

 

> 60

12

8

 

6

14

 

Differentiation

      
 

Well

7

8

0.231

3

12

0.001

 

Moderate

16

11

 

10

17

 
 

Poor

6

12

 

16

2

 

TNM stages

      
 

I + II

8

12

0.361

10

10

0.855

 

III

21

19

 

19

21

 

Lymphatic metastasis

      
 

With

23

2

0.001

6

19

0.001

 

Without

6

29

 

23

12

 

LVD (VEGF-R3)

      
 

High

19

12

0.038

10

21

0.010

 

Low

10

19

 

19

10

 

Podoplanin

      
 

High

20

10

0.004

8

19

0.008

 

Low

9

21

 

21

12

 

VEGF-C expression

      
 

High

18

11

0.039

6

23

0.001

 

Low

11

20

 

23

8

 

Notch1 expression

      
 

High

8

21

0.002

   
 

Low

10

21

    

Association of NF-κB and Notch1 expression with clinical features of ESCC

The association of NF-κB expression with several clinicopathologic factors is shown in Table 1. NF-κB expression in tumor cells was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (χ2 = 32.727, P = 0.001), LVD (χ2 = 4.312, P = 0.038), VEGF-C expression (χ2 = 4.241, P = 0.039), podoplanin expression (χ2 = 8.076, P = 0.004), and Notch1 expression (χ2 = 9.675, P = 0.002). Similarly, Notch1 expression in tumor cells was significantly correlated with lymph nodes metastasis (χ2 = 10.162, P = 0.001), LVD (χ2 = 6.362, P = 0.010), VEGF-C expression (χ2 = 17.176, P = 0.001), and podoplanin expression (χ2 = 6.877, P = 0.008). There were no associations of Notch1 or NF-κB with age, sex, or TNM stage of tumors.

Association of NF-κB and Notch1 with lymph node metastasis in ESCC

In order to observe the association of NF-κB and Notch1 expression levels with lymph nodes metastasis in greater detail, we compared the histoscores of NF-κB and Notch1 expression in the context of lymph node involvement (Figure 1). Significantly, our data suggest differences in the patterns of NF-κB and Notch1 signaling with respect to lymph node metastasis status in ESCC, demonstrating strong expression of NF-κB in ESCC tissue, but weak expression of Notch1 with lymph node involvement (P < 0.05 for both). A multivariate analysis of lymph node involvement in ESCC (Table 2) indicated a positive association of NF-κB and VEGF-C expression with lymph node metastasis, independent of T stage, sex, age, and differentiation of tumor cells.
Figure 1

Association of NF-κB and Notch1 expression with lymph node metastasis in ESCC. (A) Compared with samples of ESCC without lymph node involvement, the samples of ESCC with lymph node involvement showed high levels of NF-κB expression and low levels of Notch1 expression (magnification, ×200). (B) In ESCC tissue with lymph node involvement, NF-κB staining was strong (mean histoscore, 5.55 ± 0.41) and Notch1 staining was weak (mean histoscore, 3.41 ± 0.36) compared with tissues without lymph node involvement (mean histoscores, 4.90 ± 0.43 and 4.27 ± 0.27 for NF-κB and Notch1, respectively; P < 0.05 for both).

Table 2

Multivariate analysis of lymph node involvement in ESCC (logistic regression model)

Variable

β

HR (95% CI)

P

NF-κB

1.551

4.716 (1.037-21.454)

0.045

Notch1

-0.273

0.761 (0.459-1.263)

0.291

VEGF-C

0.866

2.377 (1.257-4.494)

0.008

T stage

0.117

1.125 (0.627-2.016)

0.694

Sex

-0.157

0.855 (0.160-4.566)

0.854

Age

0.030

1.030 (0.966-1.098)

0.365

Differentiation

- 0.126

0.882 (0.284-2.736)

0.828

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval of the estimated HR.

Association of NF-κB and Notch1 with tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis in ESCC

The average histoscore of LVD (VEGF-R3) distribution, an important lymphangiogenetic factor, was 5.06 ± 0.28 in all ESCC samples in our study. LVD histoscores were higher (5.95 ± 0.35) in NF-κB-high patients and lower (4.23 ± 0.39) in NF-κB-low patients (Figure 2). Conversely, lower rates of LVD were observed in Notch1-high patients (3.92 ± 0.38), whereas higher rates were found in Notch1-low patients (6.20 ± 0.31). As another important lymphangiogenetic factor, the average histoscore of podoplanin distribution was 7.34 ± 0.87 in all ESCC samples in present study, and their histoscores were also higher (10.08 ± 1.28) in NF-κB-high patients and lower (5.49 ± 1.05) in NF-κB-low patients (p = 0.008). Thus, LVD was significantly positively associated with NF-κB expression, but negatively associated with Notch1 expression. Consistent with this, VEGF-C expression was positively correlated with NF-κB and negatively correlated with Notch1 (Figure 3). To directly link NF-κB and Notch1 expression with lymphangiogenesis in ESCC, we performed a multiple factors analysis of LVD. As shown in Table 3, differences in LVD status were significantly correlated with expression of NF-κB, Notch1 and VEGF-C, independent of T stage, sex, age, and differentiation status of tumor cells. Moreover, a multiple factors analysis of VEGF-C, which is a key factor in tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis, revealed a positive association of VEGF-C status in ESCC tissue with the expression of NF-κB and a negative association with the expression of Notch1, independent of T stage, sex, age, and tumor cell differentiation status (Table 4).
Figure 2

Association of NF-κB and Notch1 expression with lymphangiogenesis in ESCC. (A) NF-κB expression in ESCC tissue was positively correlated with LVD in tumors. (B) Notch1 expression in ESCC tissue was negatively correlated with LVD in tumors. (C) The mean histoscore of LVD expression was higher in ESCC tissue with high levels of NF-κB expression (5.95 ± 0.35) than in those with low levels of NF-κB expression (4.22 ± 0.39; P < 0.05). Conversely, the mean LVD histoscore (VEGFR-3 expression) was lower in ESCC tissue with high levels of Notch1 expression (3.92 ± 0.38) than in those with low levels of Notch1 expression (6.20 ± 0.31; P < 0.05).

Figure 3

Association of NF-κB and Notch1 expression with VEGF-C in ESCC. (A) NF-κB expression in ESCC tissue was positively correlated with VEGF-C expression in tumors. (B) Notch1 expression in ESCC tissue was negatively correlated with VEGF-C expression in tumors. (C) The mean histoscore of VEGF-C expression was higher in ESCC tissue with high levels of NF-κB expression (6.48 ± 0.44) than in those with low levels of NF-κB expression (3.53 ± 0.39; P < 0.05). Conversely, the mean histoscore of VEGF-C expression was lower in ESCC tissue with high levels of Notch1 expression (3.41 ± 0.37) than in those with low levels of Notch1 expression (6.51 ± 0.84; P < 0.05).

Table 3

Multivariate analysis of LVD (VEGF-R3) in ESCC (logistic regression model)

Variable

β

HR (95% CI)

P

NF-κB

1.659

5.255 (1.296-21.300)

0.020

Notch1

-0.607

0.545 (0.329-0.904)

0.019

VEGF-C

0.583

1.791 (1.021-3.144)

0.042

T stage

-0.353

0.793 (0.442-1.118)

0.136

Sex

-1.548

0.213 (0.035-1.285)

0.092

Age

0.411

1.509 (0.092-24.751)

0.773

Differentiation

1.659

0.509 (0.099-2.627)

0.420

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval of the estimated HR.

Table 4

Multivariate analysis of VEGF-C in ESCC (logistic regression model)

Variable

β

HR (95% CI)

P

NF-κB

1.930

6.889 (1.269-37.394)

0.025

Notch1

-0.605

0.546 (0.331-0.902)

0.018

T stage

0.765

2.149 (0.593-7.783)

0.244

Sex

0.371

1.450 (0.846-2.484)

0.176

Age

0.026

1.026 (0.969-1.088)

0.376

Differentiation

0.511

1.667 (0.607-4.580)

0.321

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval of the estimated HR.

Association of NF-κB expression with Notch1 expression in ESCC

Collectively, our data suggested a significant correlation between NF-κB and Notch1 expression in ESCC tissues (Pearson coefficient, 0.798; P = 0.001; Spearman coefficient, -0.723; P = 0.001; Figure 4A). Lower NF-κB histoscores were observed in Notch1-high patients (3.52 ± 0.53), whereas higher NF-κB histoscores were found in Notch1-low patients (6.71 ± 0.74; Figure 4B). These results indicate that up-regulation of NF-κB is associated with down-regulation of Notch1 in ESCC.
Figure 4

Association of NF-κB expression with Notch1 expression in ESCC. (A) NF-κB expression was negatively correlated with Notch1 expression in ESCC tissue. (B) The mean histoscore of NF-κB expression was lower in ESCC tissue with high levels of Notch1 expression (3.52 ± 0.53) than in those with low levels of Notch1 expression (6.71 ± 0.74; P < 0.05).

Discussion

Esophageal cancer is a disease with poor prognosis. Of the many prognostic factors identified to date, lymph node metastasis is one of the most significant, and tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis is believed to be a crucial prognostic factor for patient outcome [19, 20]. VEGF-C has been characterized as a lymphangiogenic growth factor and has been shown to signal through the receptor, VEGFR-3 [21]. Moreover, there is a positive relationship between the expression of VEGF-C and the prognosis of patients with ESCC [20]. However, the precise mechanisms that underlie the development of tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis in ESCC are far from clear.

Recent accumulating evidence suggests that the NF-κB signaling pathway plays a critical role in carcinogenesis, protection from apoptosis, and chemoresistance in a number of cancer types, including head and neck cancer, breast cancer, and esophageal carcinoma [2224]. NF-κB, which is retained in the cytoplasm through association with IκBα, is liberated upon phosphorylation of IκBα, whereupon it enters the nucleus to regulate the expression of genes involved in cell apoptosis and proliferation [25]. Importantly, NF-κB appears to be one of the main molecular mechanisms responsible for tumor formation and progression [26]. NF-κB is reported to be associated with invasive angiogenesis in cancer [27], and lymphatic endothelial cells express a set of specific markers (e.g., VEGF-C and VEGFR-3) [28]. On the basis of these observations, we assessed the relationships between intratumoral NF-κB and VEGFR-3 or VEGF-C expression in ESCC, in an effort to demonstrate the association of NF-κB with tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis. Our demonstration of a positive link between high levels of NF-κB expression and LVD and VEGF-C suggests that NF-κB may contribute to tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis in ESCC. The mechanistic aspect of the linkage between NF-κB and LVD was supported by the report that activation of NF-κB followed by sequential up-regulation of VEGFR-3 expression in cultured lymphatic endothelial cells and increasing of proliferation and migration, it suggested that induction of NF-κB enhanced the responsiveness of preexisting lymphatic endothelium to VEGFR-3 binding factors and resulted in lymphangiogenesis [29]. Interestingly, LVD reduced prominently in lungs of mice lacking p50 subunit of NF-κB, which demonstrated the important role of p50 subunit of NF-κB in regulating the expression of VEGFR-3 [30]. Regarding to the above molecular changing were found in inflammation-induced lymphangiogenesis, further research will be required to confirm the mechanistic aspect between NF-κB and LVD in tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis.

In contrast, we found that the expression of Notch1, which is involved in regulating vascular development, was negatively correlated with the lymphatic markers, VEGFR-3 and VEGF-C. These findings seemingly contradict those of a previous study, which reported that Notch signaling is positively correlated with VEGFR-3 and other lymphatic endothelial cell markers in physiological lymphangiogenesis [31]. The role of Notch1 in various tumors has been obscure, although researchers have suggested that Notch1 might contribute to guiding endothelial cells through the cell fate decisions needed to form and maintain a functional vascular network [32]; consistent with such a role, multiple connections between the VEGF system and the Notch signaling cascade have been previously described [33]. In a malignant environment, such as invasive breast carcinoma, cleaved (activated) Notch1 has been observed in a subset of lymphatic endothelial nuclei, indicating that Notch1 is not only expressed but is activated in tumor lymphatic vessels [31]. However, how Notch signaling participates in pathological tumor lymphangiogenesis remains unclear. Our finding that Notch1 expression is negatively associated with high expression of VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 in ESCC may indicate that down-regulation of Notch1 signaling contributes to tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that high NF-κB and low Notch1 expression are correlated with high expression of VEGFR-3 (a marker of LVD) and VEGF-C, in ESCC patients, revealing an inverse relationship between Notch1 and NF-κB signaling and tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis. Taken together, our findings imply that Notch1 and NF-κB signaling have counter-acting roles in tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis in ESCC, and suggest that Notch may differentially regulate physiological and tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis.

Notes

List of abbreviations

VEGF: 

vascular endothelial growth factor

VEGF-C: 

vascular endothelial growth factor C

ESCC: 

esophageal squamous cell cancer

VEGFR-3: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Key Scientific and Technological Projects of Guangdong Province (Grant nos. 2008B030301311 and 2008B030301341).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
(2)
Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
(3)
Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
(4)
Department of Rehabilitation, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
(5)
Center for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education
(6)
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

References

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, Feuer EJ, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005, 55 (1): 10-30. 10.3322/canjclin.55.1.10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ: Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003, 349: 2241-2252. 10.1056/NEJMra035010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kimura Y, Watanabe M, Ohga T, Saeki H, Kakeji Y, Baba H, Maehara Y: Vascular endothelial growth factor C expression correlates with lymphatic involvement and poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2003, 10: 1747-1751.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kazama S, Nagawa H: The expression pattern of vascular endothelial growth factor C and D in human esophageal normal mucosa, dysplasia and neoplasia. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004, 51: 1319-1322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ding MX, Lin XQ, Fu XY, Zhang N, Li JC: Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and angiogenesis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2006, 12: 4582-4585.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Auvinen MI, Sihvo EI, Ruohtula T, Salminen JT, Koivistoinen A, Siivola P, Ronnholm R, Ramo JO, Bergman M, Salo JA: Incipient angiogenesis in Barrett's epithelium and lymphangiogenesis in Barrett's adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 2971-2979. 10.1200/JCO.2002.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kitadai Y, Amioka T, Haruma K, Tanaka S, Yoshihara M, Sumii K, Matsutani N, Yasui W, Chayama K: Clinicopathological significance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C in human esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2001, 93: 662-666. 10.1002/ijc.1379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yancopoulos GD, Davis S, Gale NW, Rudge JS, Wiegand SJ, Holash J: Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation. Nature. 2000, 407: 242-248. 10.1038/35025215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Karkkainen MJ, Saaristo A, Jussila L, Karila KA, Lawrence EC, Pajusola K, Bueler H, Eichmann A, Kauppinen R, Kettunen MI, Yla-Herttuala S, Finegold DN, Ferrell RE, Alitalo K: A model for gene therapy of human hereditary lymphedema. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98 (22): 12677-12682. 10.1073/pnas.221449198.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sahin M, Sahin E, Gumuslu S: Cyclooxygenase-2 in cancer and angiogenesis. Angiology. 2009, 60: 242-253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Karin M: Nuclear factor-κB in cancer development and progression. Nature. 2006, 441: 431-436. 10.1038/nature04870.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Izzo JG, Correa AM, Wu TT, Malhotra U, Chao CKS, Luthra R, Ensor J, Dekovich A, Liao ZX, Hittelman WN, Aggarwal BB, Ajani JA: Pretherapy nuclear factor-κB status, chemoradiation resistance, and metastatic progression in esophageal carcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006, 5 (11): 2844-2850. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Magne N, Toillon RA, Bottero V, Didelot C, Houtte PV, Gérard JP, Peyron JF: NF-κB modulation and ionizing radiation: mechanisms and future directions for cancer treatment. Cancer Lett. 2006, 231 (2): 158-168. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.01.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee CH, Jeon YT, Kim SH, Song YS: NF-κB as a potential molecular target for cancer therapy. BioFactors. 2007, 29 (1): 19-35. 10.1002/biof.5520290103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Krebs LT, Xue Y, Norton CR, Shutter JR, Maguire M, Sundberg JP, Gallahan D, Closson V, Kitajewski J, Callahan R, Smith GH, Stark KL, Gridley T: Notch signaling is essential for vascular morphogenesis in mice. Genes Dev. 2000, 14 (11): 1343-1352.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tetzlaff MT, Yu W, Li M, Zhang P, Finegold M, Mahon K, Harper JW, Schwartz RJ, Elledge SJ: Defective cardiovascular development and elevated cyclin E and Notch proteins in mice lacking the Fbw-7 F-box protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (10): 3338-3345. 10.1073/pnas.0307875101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Radtke F, Raj K: The role of notch in tumorigenesis: oncogene or tumour suppressor?. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2003, 3: 756-767. 10.1038/nrc1186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch, Eds: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 2009, New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc, 56-60. 7
  19. Kahn HJ, Bailey D, Marks A: Monoclonal antibody, D2-40, a new marker of lymphatic endothelium, reacts with Kaposi's sarcoma and a subset of angiosarcomas. Mod Pathol. 2002, 15: 434-440. 10.1038/modpathol.3880543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tanaka T, Ishiguro H, Kuwabara Y, Kimura M, Mitsui A, Katada T, Shiozaki M, Naganawa Y, Fujii Y, Takeyama H: Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC) in esophageal cancer correlates with lymph node metastasis and poor patient prognosis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 29: 83-10.1186/1756-9966-29-83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Saad RS, Lindner JL, Liu Y, Silverman JF: Lymphatic vessel density as prognostic marker in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009, 131: 92-98. 10.1309/AJCPKWUQSIPVG90H.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pai SI, Westra WH: Molecular pathology of head and neck cancer: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Annu Rev Pathol. 2009, 4: 49-70. 10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092158.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Helbig G, Christopherson KW, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Kumar S, Kishimoto H, Miller KD, Broxmeyer HE, Nakshatri H: NF-kappaB promotes breast cancer cell migration and metastasis by inducing the expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 21631-21638. 10.1074/jbc.M300609200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Abdel-Latif MM, O'Riordan J, Windle HJ, Carton E, Ravi N, Kelleher D, Reynolds JV: NF-κB activation in esophageal adenocarcinoma: relationship to Barrett's metaplasia, survival, and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg. 2004, 239 (4): 491-500. 10.1097/01.sla.0000118751.95179.c6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Aggarwal BB: Nuclear factor-kappaB: the enemy within. Cancer Cell. 2004, 6: 203-208. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.09.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Karin M, Cao Y, Greten FR, Li ZW: NF-kappaB in cancer: from innocent bystander to major culprit. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2 (4): 301-310. 10.1038/nrc780.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Shishodia S, Aggarwal BB: Nuclear factor-kappaB activation mediates cellular transformation, proliferation, invasion angiogenesis and metastasis of cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 2004, 119: 139-173. 10.1007/1-4020-7847-1_8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Weidner N: Intratumor microvessel density as a prognostic factor in cancer. Am J Pathol. 1995, 147: 9-19.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Flister MJ, Wilber A, Hall KL, Iwata C, Miyazono K, Nisato RE, Pepper MS, Zawieja DC, Ran S: Inflammation induces lymphangiogenesis through up-regulation of VEGFR-3 mediated by NF-κB and Prox1. Blood. 2010, 115 (2): 418-429. 10.1182/blood-2008-12-196840.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Flister MJ, Volk LD, Ran S: Characterization of Prox1 and VEGFR-3 expression and lymphatic phenotype in normal organs of mice lacking p50 subunit of NF-κB. Microcirculation. 2011, 18 (2): 85-101. 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2010.00057.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shawber CJ, Funahashi Y, Francisco E, Vorontchikhina M, Kitamura Y, Stowell SA, Borisenko V, Feirt N, Podgrabinska S, Shiraishi K, Chawengsaksophak K, Rossant J, Accili D, Skobe M, Kitajewski J: Notch alters VEGF responsiveness in human and murine endothelial cells by direct regulation of VEGFR-3 expression. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117 (11): 3369-3382. 10.1172/JCI24311.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Benedito R, Roca C, Sorensen I, Adams S, Gossler A, Fruttiger M, Adams RH: The notch ligands Dll4 and Jagged1 have opposing effects on angiogenesis. Cell. 2009, 137: 1124-1135. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Siekmann AF, Lawson ND: Notch signalling limits angiogenic cell behaviour in developing zebrafish arteries. Nature. 2007, 445: 781-784. 10.1038/nature05577.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Su et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.