Open Access

MTA1 promotes nasopharyngeal carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo

  • Qingcui Song1,
  • Hong Zhang2,
  • Min Wang2,
  • Wen Song2,
  • Min Ying2,
  • Yuan Fang2,
  • Yiyi Li2,
  • Yilan Chao2 and
  • Xiaoxia Zhu2Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201332:54

DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-54

Received: 26 July 2013

Accepted: 12 August 2013

Published: 14 August 2013

Abstract

Background

The prognostic value of metastasis-associated gene 1 (MTA1) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has been suggested. However, there is still no direct evidence that MTA1 promotes NPC growth in vivo. In this study, we aimed to investigate the function of MTA1 in the regulation of NPC cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

Stable MTA1 knockdown or overexpression NPC cell lines were employed. The effects of MTA1 depletion or overexpression on cell proliferation, colony formation, cell cycle progression were examined by MTT, colony formation and flow cytometry assay. The effects of MTA1 depletion on tumor growth in vivo were examined in mouse xenograft model.

Results

MTA1 knockdown or overexpression drastically changed the proliferation, colony formation and cell cycle of NPC cells in vitro. MTA1 depletion significantly suppressed NPC tumorigenesis in vivo.

Conclusion

MTA1 promotes NPC cell proliferation via enhancing G1 to S phase transition, leading to increased tumor growth. Targeting MTA1 is a promising approach to reduce tumor burden of NPC.

Keywords

MTA1 Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Cell proliferation Tumorigenesis

Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is an epithelial malignant tumor with a high incidence in southern China and Southeast Asia. Radiotherapy is a dominant treatment approach for NPC. Primary tumor volume (GTV-P) is known to be positively correlated with the prognosis of NPC [1, 2]. Despite recently increased use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), GTV-P is still an independent prognostic indicator for treatment outcome of NPC, and has correlations with T classification, cervical lymph node metastasis as well as post-treatment distant metastasis [3, 4]. Tumor volume is known to be positively correlated with the proliferation ability of tumor cells. Thus further understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying abnormal proliferation of NPC cells will help develop novel options for the diagnosis, therapy and prognosis of NPC.

Metastasis-associated gene 1 (MTA1) has been implicated in the carcinogenesis and metastasis of a variety of human cancers [57]. In particular, recent studies suggest the prognostic value of MTA1 in NPC because MTA1 overexpression was an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival of NPC patients [8, 9]. Our recent study provided direct evidence that MTA1 regulated actin cytoskeleton reorganization to promote NPC metastasis [7]. However, the role of MTA1 in NPC cell proliferation is not clear.

In the present study, we employed both gain and loss of function approaches to investigate the role of MTA1 in NPC growth. We examined the effects of MTA1 overexpression or knockdown on NPC cell proliferation, cell-cycle distribution, and colony formation in vitro. In addition, we evaluated the effects of MTA1 knockdown on NPC xenograft growth in nude mice. Our results showed that MTA1 promoted NPC growth in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

Cell culture

Stable MTA1 knockdown NPC cell lines (CNE1/MTA1-si and C666-1/MTA1-si), stable MTA1 overexpression NPC cell line (NP69/MTA1), and their corresponding control cells (CNE1 or C666-1/CTL-si, and CNE1, C666-1 or NP69/NC) were constructed and cultured as described in previous study [7]. CNE1 were well-differentiated NPC cells, C666-1 were undifferentiated NPC cells, and NP-69 were immortalized NPC cells.

Cell proliferation assay

The cells were plated into 96-well plates at the density of 5,000 cells/well and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days, respectively. Then cells were incubated with 20 μL MTT [3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] (5 mg/mL) (Promega, Shanghai, China) for additional 4 h, and 100 μL DMSO was added into each well to dissolve the formazan product. The absorbance of the enzyme was measured at 490 nm using an Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Cell growth rates (average absorbance of each group) were then calculated. All experiments were performed in triplicate samples and repeated at least three times.

Colony formation assay

The cells were grown in 6-well plates and cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cells were then continuously cultured until visible colonies were formed (14 days). The colonies were fixed with methanol for 15 min, stained with hematoxylin for 10–15 min, and colonies containing >50 cells were counted. The rate of colony formation was indicated by the ratio of the number of colonies over the number of seeded cells. The experiment was repeated three times, and a mean value was presented.

Cell cycle analysis

Cell cycle distribution was detected by using Cycletest Plus DNA Reagent kit (Becton Dickinson, USA). The protocol recommended by BD Bioscience was followed. The samples were run with a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, USA) and the results obtained were analyzed using the ModFit software.

Xenograft model

Female athymic BALB/c nu/nu mice (4–6 weeks old) were purchased from Guangdong Medical Laboratory Animal Center (Guangzhou, China). All protocols for animal studies were reviewed and approved by Animal Care and Use Committee of Southern Medical University. 1 × 107 cells from individual cloned cell lines were injected subcutaneously into the left flank and right flank of nude mice (n = 5 per group). After 10 days of implantation of tumor cells, tumors were measured with calipers every 3 days. Tumor volume was calculated according to the following formula: V = (L*W2*π)/6, V, volume (mm3); L, biggest diameter (mm); W, smallest diameter (mm) [10]. At the end of experiments, the mice were euthanized and tumors were excised and weighed.

Immunohistochemical staining

Immunohistochemical staining was performed using standard protocol. Briefly, cryosections were stained with primary antibodies for MTA1 (1:200; Abcam, USA) and Ki67 (1:200; Abcam, USA), followed by incubation with secondary antibodies. A stained cell was considered as positive cell. All results of immunohistochemical staining were double-blinded judged by different pathologists.

Statistical analysis

All data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. The two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test was used to assess differences in cell growth rate, colony formation, cell cycle distribution, tumor weight, tumor volume and immunohistochemistry stained cell count between groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

MTA1 regulates NPC cell growth in vitro

First we examined the effect of endogenous MTA1 knockdown on NPC cell growth. MTT assay showed that MTA1 knockdown reduced the cell growth rate by 44% in C666 cells (P < 0.001) and by 30% in CNE1 cells (P < 0.001) (Figure 1A). Colony formation assay showed that MTA1 knockdown resulted in dramatic decrease of colony-formation efficiency in C666-1 and CNE1 cells, compared to their corresponding controls (P <0.01; Figure 1B). These data imply that endogenous MTA1 is essential to the proliferation and colony formation of NPC cells.
Figure 1

MTA1 promotes the growth of NPC cells in vitro . (A) MTT proliferation assay of MTA1 knockdown cell lines, MTA1 overexpression cell lines and control cells. (B) Representative images of colony formation assay of MTA1 knockdown cell lines, MTA1 overexpression cell lines and control cells. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of cell-cycle distribution of MTA1 knockdown C666-1 cells and control cells. All results were reproducible in three independent experiments. CTL-si versus WT: P > 0.05; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared to CTL-si. # P < 0.001 compared to NC. OD, optical density.

To further investigate the function of MTA1 in NPC cell growth, we performed gain-of-function experiments in immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell NP69. Compared with the cells transfected with empty vector, enforced MTA1 overexpression significantly promoted the growth and colony-formation capacity of NP69 cells (p < 0.001; Figure 1A and B).

To understand how MTA1 promotes NPC cell proliferation and colony formation, we examined cell cycle progression of C666-1 cells depleted of MTA1. Compared with control cells, C666-1/MTA1-si cells displayed an increased percentage of cells in G1 phase and fewer cells in G2 phase (p < 0.001), but no significant difference in S phrase distribution (Figure 1C). The results demonstrate that MTA1 knockdown induced cell cycle arrest at G1.

MTA1 depletion inhibits the growth of NPC xenografts in vivo

To assess the effect of MTA1 on NPC growth in vivo, we injected MTA1 depleted C666-1 or CNE1 cells, or their control cells into nude mice subcutaneously, and then monitored tumor growth. Palpable tumors were first detected in all mice by day 10 after injection. At the end of experiments, all the mice developed tumors (Figure 2A). Compared with control, the average tumor volume in mice injected with MTA1 depleted C666-1 or CNE1 cells was markedly reduced by more than 60% (p < 0.01; Figure 2B). The average tumor weight was also significantly reduced in MTA1 depleted group (p < 0.01; Figure 2C).
Figure 2

MTA1 depletion inhibits NPC tumorigenesis in vivo . (A) MTA1 knockdown NPC cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of nude mice. Control cells were injected subcutaneously into the left flank of the same nude mice (n = 5). At 3 weeks after implantation, MTA1 knockdown cells produced smaller tumors than control cells. (B) Growth curve of tumor volumes. Each data point represented mean ± SD of 5 mice. (C) The tumor from each group was weighed immediately after the dissection. The average tumor weight was indicated as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 as compared to CTL-si.

Further immunohistochemical assessment of the nuclear antigen Ki-67 was used to estimate cell proliferation. The results demonstrated that the number of Ki-67 positive cells was significantly decreased in tumor nodules originating from MTA1 depleted cells, compared to control cells (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Immunohistochemistry staining of Ki67 in mouse xenograft models. MTA1 and Ki67 staining was less in subcutaneous tumor tissues derived from MTA1 knockdown NPC cells, compared with those from control cells (Magnification, ×200).

Discussion

MTA1 has been shown to be overexpressed in human cancers [5]. However, the clinicopathological evidence to support the correlation of MTA1 overexpression with tumor growth is limited. Only one report demonstrated that MTA1 overexpression was associated with larger tumor size in hepatocellular cancer [11]. Several studies examined the clinicopathological significance of MTA1 in NPC, but found no association between increased MTA1 expression and T-stage [8, 9]. This may be due to the limitations of current T staging system of NPC for determining tumor burden [3]. The inclusion of tumor volume into TNM staging system has been proposed [3, 4]. Thus the biological relevance of MTA1 to NPC growth and tumor volume need to be further investigated.

In fact, MTA1 is clearly involved in breast cancer growth. Antisense of MTA1 inhibited the growth of highly metastatic breast cancer cell lines [12]. Moreover, forced expression of MTA1 nhanced the ability of breast cancer cell line MCF-7 to grow in an anchorage-independent manner [13]. MTA1 controbutes to inappropriate development of mammary glands, hyperplastic nodules and mammary tumors [14, 15]. In our study, we transfected MTA1 cDNA into immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell and showed that enforced expression of MTA1 contributed to increased cell growth and colony formation, consistent with the results by Mahoney et al. [16]. We further examined the therapeutic value of MTA1 siRNA and found that downregulation of MTA1 by RNAi successfully suppressed the growth of C666-1 NPC cells in vitro and in vivo, suggested that MTA1 is a promising target for NPC gene therapy.

The abnormal cell cycle is crucial to the proliferation of cancer cells. Different from our findings in lung cancer cells [17], in the present study, we provided evidence that MTA1 knockdown induced G1 arrest of NPC cells, suggesting that MTA1 promotes aberrant G1 to S phase transition, leading to increased proliferation and tumorigenicity of NPC cells. These divergent findings suggest that the effect of MTA1 on tumor cell growth and cell cycle progression are cell dependent. Cell cycle is regulated by a variety of signaling pathways, among which p53 pathway is a crucial regulator of cell cycle and apoptosis of cancer cells [18]. Emerging data suggest that MTA1 had deacetylation activity on p53 and subsequently attenuated the transactivation function of p53 [19, 20]. MTA1 was also identified as a p53-independent transcriptional corepressor of p21 (WAF1), which is a direct target of p53 and mediates p53-dependent G1 growth arrest [21].

Conclusions

In summary, we found that MTA1 knockdown in NPC cells decreases cell proliferation in vitro via the induction of G1 phase arrest and drastically suppresses tumor formation in vivo. These findings suggest that targeting MTA1 is a promising approach to reduce tumor burden of NPC.

Notes

Declarations

Grant support

This study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 81001047/H1615), Educational Commission of Guangdong Province (NO. LYM09037), Science and technology projects in Guangdong Province (2012B031800127), and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (NO. 9151051501000035).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cancer Research Institute, Key Lab for Transcriptomics and Proteomics of Human Fatal Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
(2)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

References

  1. Chen MK, Chen TH, Liu JP, Chang CC, Chie WC: Better prediction of prognosis for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma using primary tumor volume. Cancer. 2004, 100 (10): 2160-2166. 10.1002/cncr.20210.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sze WM, Lee AW, Yau TK, Yeung RM, Lau KY, Leung SK, Hung AW, Lee MC, Chappell R, Chan K: Primary tumor volume of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: prognostic significance of local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004, 59 (1): 21-27. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.027.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Wu Z, Gu MF, Zeng RF, Su Y, Huang SM: Correlation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumor volume and the 2002 international union against cancer tumor classification system. Radiat Oncol. 2013, 8 (1): 87-10.1186/1748-717X-8-87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Guo R, Sun Y, Yu XL, Yin WJ, Li WF, Chen YY, Mao YP, Liu LZ, Li L, Lin AH, Ma J: Is primary tumor volume still a prognostic factor in intensity modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma?. Radiother Oncol. 2012, 104 (3): 294-299. 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.09.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Toh Y, Nicolson GL: The role of the MTA family and their encoded proteins in human cancers: molecular functions and clinical implications. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2009, 26 (3): 215-227. 10.1007/s10585-008-9233-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Li Y, Chao Y, Fang Y, Wang J, Wang M, Zhang H, Ying M, Zhu X, Wang H: MTA1 promotes the invasion and migration of non-small cell lung cancer cells by downregulating miR-125b. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2013, 32: 33-10.1186/1756-9966-32-33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Song Q, Li Y, Zheng X, Fang Y, Chao Y, Yao K, Zhu X: MTA1 contributes to actin cytoskeleton reorganization and metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by modulating Rho GTPases and Hedgehog signaling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013, 45 (7): 1439-1446. 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.04.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Li WF, Liu N, Cui RX, He QM, Chen M, Jiang N, Sun Y, Zeng J, Liu LZ, Ma J: Nuclear overexpression of metastasis-associated protein 1 correlates significantly with poor survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2012, 10: 78-10.1186/1479-5876-10-78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Deng YF, Zhou DN, Ye CS, Zeng L, Yin P: Aberrant expression levels of MTA1 and RECK in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: association with metastasis, recurrence, and prognosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012, 121 (7): 457-465.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Caysa H, Hoffmann S, Luetzkendorf J, Mueller LP, Unverzagt S, Mäder K, Mueller T: Monitoring of xenograft tumor growth and response to chemotherapy by non-invasive in vivo multispectral fluorescence imaging. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (10): e47927-10.1371/journal.pone.0047927.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Moon WS, Chang K, Tarnawski AS: Overexpression of metastatic tumor antigen 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: Relationship to vascular invasion and estrogen receptor-alpha. Hum Pathol. 2004, 35 (4): 424-429. 10.1016/j.humpath.2003.11.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Nawa A, Nishimori K, Lin P, Maki Y, Moue K, Sawada H, Toh Y, Fumitaka K, Nicolson GL: Tumor metastasis-associated human MTA1 gene: its deduced protein sequence, localization, and association with breast cancer cell proliferation using antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotides. J Cell Biochem. 2000, 79 (2): 202-212. 10.1002/1097-4644(20001101)79:2<202::AID-JCB40>3.0.CO;2-L.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Mazumdar A, Wang RA, Mishra SK, Adam L, Bagheri-Yarmand R, Mandal M, Vadlamudi RK, Kumar R: Transcriptional repression of oestrogen receptor by metastasis-associated protein 1 corepressor. Nat Cell Biol. 2001, 3 (1): 30-37. 10.1038/35050532.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Bagheri-Yarmand R, Talukder AH, Wang RA, Vadlamudi RK, Kumar R: Metastasis- associated protein 1 deregulation causes inappropriate mammary gland development and tumorigenesis. Development. 2004, 131 (14): 3469-3479. 10.1242/dev.01213.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Singh RR, Kumar R: MTA family of transcriptional metaregulators in mammary gland morphogenesis and breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2007, 12 (2–3): 115-125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahoney MG, Simpson A, Jost M, Noé M, Kari C, Pepe D, Choi YW, Uitto J, Rodeck U: Metastasis-associated protein (MTA)1 enhances migration, invasion, and anchorage-independent survival of immortalized human keratinocytes. Oncogene. 2002, 21 (14): 2161-2170. 10.1038/sj.onc.1205277.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhu X, Zhang X, Wang H, Song Q, Zhang G, Yang L, Geng J, Li X, Yuan Y, Chen L: MTA1 gene silencing inhibits invasion and alters the microRNA expression profile of human lung cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2012, 28 (1): 218-224.Google Scholar
  18. Zheng C, Jia W, Tang Y, Zhao H, Jiang Y, Sun S: Mesothelin regulates growth and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells through p53-dependent and -independent signal pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2012, 31: 84-10.1186/1756-9966-31-84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Moon HE, Cheon H, Lee MS: Metastasis-associated protein 1 inhibits p53-induced apoptosis. Oncol Rep. 2007, 18 (5): 1311-1314.Google Scholar
  20. Kai L, Samuel SK, Levenson AS: Resveratrol enhances p53 acetylation and apoptosis in prostate cancer by inhibiting MTA1/NuRD complex. Int J Cancer. 2010, 126 (7): 1538-1548.Google Scholar
  21. Li DQ, Pakala SB, Reddy SD, Ohshiro K, Peng SH, Lian Y, Fu SW, Kumar R: Revelation of p53-independent function of MTA1 in DNA damage response via modulation of the p21 WAF1-proliferating cell nuclear antigen pathway. J Biol Chem. 2010, 285 (13): 10044-10052. 10.1074/jbc.M109.079095.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Song et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement