Skip to main content

Table 3 Expression changes of EGFR and Raf in CL187 cells after irradiation and/or EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment (%, x ¯ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGafmiEaGNbaebaaaa@2D66@ ± s).

From: The biological effect of 125I seed continuous low dose rate irradiation in CL187 cells

 

EGFR

Raf

Control

45.36 ± 3.91

39.57 ± 3.48

125I irradiation

74.27 ± 5.63a

53.84 ± 2.31d

Anti-EGFR mAb

2.31 ± 0.19b

14.68 ± 1.35e

125I irradiation + Anti-EGFR mAb

2.27 ± 0.13c

13.74 ± 1.82f

  1. Compared with control group (EGFR), t = 54.84, aP < 0.01; t = 27.38, bP < 0.05. Compared with anti-EGFR mAb group (EGFR), t = 1.21, cP > 0.05. Compared with control group (Raf), t = 46.66, dP < 0.01; and t = 26.60, eP < 0.01. Compared with anti-EGFR mAb group (Raf), t = 0.98, fP > 0.05.