Skip to main content

Table 1 Overall and stratified meta-analyses of the association between the EPHX1 Tyr113His polymorphism and cancer risk

From: Quantitative assessment of the influence of EPHX1 gene polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis with 94,213 subjects

Variables

Noa

Case/control

Homozygote comparison

Heterozygote comparison

Dominant model

Recessive model

Additive model

   

OR (95% CI)

P

Pb(I2)

OR (95% CI)

P

Pb(I2)

OR (95% CI)

P

Pb(I2)

OR (95% CI)

P

Pb(I2)

OR (95% CI)

P

Pb(I2)

Total

45

20091/27396

1.05(0.95 ~ 1.16)

0.37

0.00(50.8)

0.94(0.88 ~ 1.01)

0.08

0.0(54.0)

0.96(0.90 ~ 1.03)

0.26

0.0(56.8)

1.08(0.99 ~ 1.18)

0.08

0.0(37.4)

1.00(0.95 ~ 1.05)

0.94

0.0(57.7)

Cancer type

                 

Blood

7

2419/2319

1.05(0.76 ~ 1.46)

0.76

0.03(56.1)

0.89(0.73 ~ 1.01)

0.24

0.06(49.8)

0.92(0.75 ~ 1.13)

0.42

0.02(60.3)

1.17(0.96 ~ 1.41)

0.12

0.14(37.3)

0.97(0.82 ~ 1.15)

0.76

0.01(65.9)

Prostate

3

1706/1192

1.54(0.57 ~ 4.16)

0.86

0.00(88.9)

1.31(0.82 ~ 2.01)

0.26

0.00(79.7)

1.39(0.80 ~ 2.41)

0.24

0.00(87.1)

1.29(0.62 ~ 2.65)

0.50

0.0(82.2)

1.27(0.81 ~ 1.97)

0.30

0.00(89.7)

Esophageal

3

593/1086

1.09(0.78 ~ 1.51)

0.63

0.19(40.5)

1.01(0.52 ~ 1.93)

0.99

0.00(86.0)

1.08(0.63 ~ 1.84)

0.79

0.00(81.6)

1.16(0.85 ~ 1.58)

0.34

0.20(38.4)

1.09(0.84 ~ 1.41)

0.51

0.07(61.9)

Colorectal

9

5512/6787

0.98(0.86 ~ 1.11)

0.75

0.85(0.0)

1.00(0.93 ~ 1.08)

0.98

0.79(0.0)

0.99(0.93 ~ 1.07)

0.98

0.80(0.0)

0.98(0.87 ~ 1.11)

0.76

0.87(0.0)

1.00(0.94 ~ 1.05)

0.87

0.84(0.0)

Other

7

2425/2872

1.20(0.90 ~ 1.59)

0.22

0.06(50.4)

1.00(0.81 ~ 1.24)

0.99

0.01(66.7)

1.04(0.84 ~ 1.29)

0.74

0.00(69.4)

1.18(0.98 ~ 1.42)

0.08

0.40(2.8)

1.06(0.91 ~ 1.23)

0.45

0.01(65.5)

Lung

9

2065/5429

0.80(0.57 ~ 1.12)

0.20

0.00(62.5)

0.80(0.65 ~ 0.98)

0.03

0.00(65.0)

0.81(0.68 ~ 0.98)

0.03

0.01(62.5)

0.91(0.66 ~ 1.25)

0.57

0.01(61.7)

0.87(0.75 ~ 1.01)

0.08

0.0(65.5)

Head and neck

3

825/821

1.04(0.74 ~ 1.47)

0.81

0.98(0.0)

0.87(0.71 ~ 1.07)

0.19

0.82(0.0)

0.90(0.74 ~ 1.10)

0.30

0.85(0.0)

1.11(0.80 ~ 1.54)

0.53

0.99(0.0)

0.96(0.83 ~ 1.12)

0.61

0.91(0.0)

Breast cancer

4

4546/6890

1.02(0.90 ~ 1.17)

0.73

0.15(43.0)

0.99(0.91 ~ 1.07)

0.73

0.60(0.0)

0.99(0.92 ~ 1.07)

0.35

0.99(0.0)

1.14(0.89 ~ 1.46)

0.31

0.05(62.6)

1.00(0.97 ~ 1.03)

0.93

0.68(0.0)

Source of control

                 

PB

31

16035/23111

1.03(0.93 ~ 1.14)

0.54

0.06(29.7)

0.97(0.92 ~ 1.03)

0.28

0.10(25.1)

0.98(0.93 ~ 1.04)

0.45

0.06(30.4)

1.03(0.96 ~ 1.11)

0.38

0.14(21.9)

1.00(0.95 ~ 1.04)

0.91

0.03(34.7)

HB

11

3517/3627

0.94(0.77 ~ 1.15)

0.56

0.08(40.9)

0.81(0.69 ~ 0.96)

0.01

0.00(59.4)

0.85(0.74 ~ 0.98)

0.03

0.03(49.4)

1.05(0.86 ~ 1.27)

0.66

0.05(45.7)

0.93(0.84 ~ 1.03)

0.16

0.05(45.3)

Ethnicity

                 

Caucasian

26

11757/18447

0.94(0.87 ~ 1.03)

0.17

0.29(11.7)

0.93(0.87 ~ 1.00)

0.04

0.09(28.7)

0.93(0.87 ~ 1.00)

0.04

0.06(31.7)

0.97(0.89 ~ 1.05)

0.45

0.49(0.0)

0.96(0.91 ~ 1.00)

0.07

0.08(29.6)

Mixed

7

5645/5502

1.17(1.02 ~ 1.34)

0.03

0.42(0.7)

1.00(0.93 ~ 1.09)

0.96

0.57(0.0)

1.03(0.96 ~ 1.11)

0.44

0.53(0.0)

1.17(1.02 ~ 1.33)

0.02

0.44(0.0)

1.05(0.99 ~ 1.11)

0.11

0.43(0.0)

Asian

11

2534/3205

1.46(1.05 ~ 2.03)

0.04

0.00(75.1)

1.04(0.77 ~ 1.40)

0.81

0.00(81.7)

1.16(0.88 ~ 1.53)

0.30

0.00(56.8)

1.39(1.10 ~ 1.76)

0.01

0.01(60.7)

1.19(0.99 ~ 1.42)

0.05

0.0(79.4)

Smoking status

                 

Smoker

9

1786/2114

0.99(0.80 ~ 1.23)

0.95

0.42(1.4)

0.85(0.66 ~ 1.10)

0.21

0.03(52.1)

0.89(0.71-1.11)

0.30

0.05(47.8)

1.07(0.87 ~ 1.31)

0.56

0.43(0.5)

0.97(0.88 ~ 1.08)

0.60

0.13(36.7)

Non-smoker

8

1357/1947

1.45(0.89 ~ 2.37)

0.14

0.00(71.4)

1.19(0.88 ~ 1.60)

0.27

0.01(63.6)

1.27(0.92 ~ 1.74)

0.14

0.00(71.7)

1.29(0.92~1.82)

0.14

0.05(50.0)

1.23(0.97 ~ 1.57)

0.09

0.00(75.8)

  1. PB: population based; HB: hospital based. Pb: P-values for heterogeneity from Q test; I2 refers to the proportion of total variation owing to between-study heterogeneity.
  2. Bold font marks where fixed effect model used.