Skip to main content

Table 2 Overall and stratified meta-analyses of the association between the EPHX1 His139Arg polymorphism and cancer risk

From: Quantitative assessment of the influence of EPHX1 gene polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis with 94,213 subjects

Variables

Noa

Case/control

Homozygote comparison

Heterozygote comparison

Dominant model

Recessive model

Additive model

   

OR (95% CI)

P

Pb(I2)

OR (95% CI)

P

Pb(I2)

OR (95% CI)

P

Pb(I2)

OR (95% CI)

P

Pb(I2)

OR (95% CI)

P

Pb(I2)

Total

54

19437/27289

1.05(0.93 ~ 1.18)

0.73

0.09(21.3)

0.96(0.91 ~ 1.01)

0.15

0.02(31.5)

0.97(0.92 ~ 1.03)

0.30

0.00(40.1)

1.02(0.93 ~ 1.13)

0.66

0.23(12.0)

0.99(0.94 ~ 1.04)

0.57

0.00(44.9)

Cancer type

                 

Other

11

3160/4581

0.94(0.75 ~ 1.20)

0.64

0.53(0.0)

0.97(0.87 ~ 1.10)

0.51

0.56(0.0)

0.97(0.87 ~ 1.06)

0.47

0.53(0.0)

0.96(0.76 ~ 1.21)

0.71

0.53(0.0)

0.97(0.89 ~ 1.05)

0.50

0.46(0.0)

Blood

9

2929/3629

0.87(0.67 ~ 1.13)

0.29

0.90(0.0)

0.90(0.81 ~ 1.00)

0.05

0.25(21.4)

0.90(0.81 ~ 0.99)

0.04

0.47(0.0)

0.90(0.70 ~ 1.17)

0.44

0.82(0.0)

0.91(0.83 ~ 0.99)

0.04

0.80(0.0)

Esophageal

3

593/1081

1.30(0.50 ~ 3.38)

0.59

0.07(61.8)

1.02(0.65 ~ 1.62)

0.92

0.03(72.6)

1.06(0.66 ~ 1.73)

0.80

0.01(77.3)

1.30(0.54 ~ 3.13)

0.56

0.10(56.5)

1.10(0.71 ~ 1.69)

0.67

0.01(79.2)

Colorectal

10

5552/7089

1.14(0.85 ~ 1.53)

0.39

0.02(53.5)

0.92(0.85 ~ 0.99)

0.03

0.97(0.0)

0.94(0.87 ~ 1.01)

0.09

0.73(0.0)

1.17(0.87 ~ 1.58)

0.29

0.02(54.0)

0.97(0.91 ~ 1.03)

0.28

0.11(36.8)

Lung

14

4767/8411

1.14(0.83 ~ 1.56)

0.42

0.02(49.3)

1.10(0.94 ~ 1.27)

0.24

0.00(63.4)

1.10(0.93 ~ 1.29)

0.27

0.00(71.9)

0.97(0.80 ~ 1.17)

0.76

0.16(27.2)

1.07(0.93 ~ 1.24)

0.36

0.00(74.1)

Head and neck

4

1035/1075

1.28(0.81 ~ 2.02)

0.30

0.99(0.0)

0.84(0.70 ~ 1.01)

0.06

0.69(0.0)

0.88(0.73 ~ 1.05)

0.14

0.70(0.0)

1.35(0.85 ~ 2.13)

0.20

1.0(0.0)

0.94(0.81 ~ 1.01)

0.41

0.78(0.0)

Breast cancer

3

1401/1423

1.04(0.69 ~ 1.59)

0.85

0.49(0.0)

0.91(0.77 ~ 1.07)

0.04

0.66(0.0)

0.92(0.79 ~ 1.08)

0.30

0.67(0.0)

1.09(0.93 ~ 1.13)

0.70

0.49(0.0)

0.95(0.83 ~ 1.09)

0.44

0.66(0.0)

Source of control

                 

HB

16

5010/5638

1.14(0.93 ~ 1.41)

0.21

0.99(0.0)

0.96(0.88 ~ 1.05)

0.37

0.20(22.7)

0.98(0.90 ~ 1.06)

0.63

0.32(11.4)

1.17(0.95 ~ 1.44)

0.15

0.99(0.0)

1.00(0.94 ~ 1.08)

0.94

0.66(0.0)

PB

36

14191/21351

1.04(0.89 ~ 1.22)

0.61

0.01(39.4)

0.96(0.90 ~ 1.03)

0.22

0.01(39.4)

0.97(0.90 ~ 1.04)

0.40

0.00(50.7)

1.04(0.90 ~ 1.21)

0.56

0.05(30.0)

0.99(0.92 ~ 1.05)

0.64

0.00(57.2)

Ethnicity

                 

Asian

13

2957/3770

0.97(0.75 ~ 1.27)

0.84

0.51(0.0)

0.99(0.89 ~ 1.11)

0.90

0.26(18.6)

0.99(0.89 ~ 1.10)

0.88

0.14(30.6)

0.98(0.76 ~ 1.28)

0.90

0.59(0.0)

1.01(0.90 ~ 1.13)

0.90

0.09(37.1)

Caucasian

32

12294/17831

1.10(0.93 ~ 1.30)

0.26

0.03(34.8)

0.95(0.88 ~ 1.02)

0.18

0.01(44.0)

0.97(0.89 ~ 1.04)

0.39

0.00(52.8)

1.07(0.95 ~ 1.21)

0.27

0.11(24.4)

0.99(0.92 ~ 1.06)

0.71

0.00(57.3)

Mixed

7

3921/5262

0.90(0.73 ~ 1.12)

0.35

0.81(0.0)

0.94(0.86 ~ 1.04)

0.22

0.43(0.0)

0.94(0.86 ~ 1.03)

0.16

0.69(0.0)

0.92(0.74 ~ 1.14)

0.45

0.71(0.0)

0.95(0.88 ~ 1.02)

0.15

0.93(0.0)

African

2

265/426

0.81(0.22 ~ 2.96)

0.75

0.08(21.3)

1.09(0.79 ~ 1.50)

0.60

0.78(0.0)

1.06(0.78 ~ 1.45)

0.69

0.46(0.0)

0.78(0.23 ~ 2.73)

0.70

0.08(66.6)

1.03(0.94 ~ 1.01)

0.84

0.22(34.7)

Smoking status

                 

Smoker

9

2331/2542

1.08(0.64 ~ 1.83)

0.77

0.01(61.5)

1.19(0.88 ~ 1.60)

0.27

0.00(76.6)

1.16(0.85 ~ 1.58)

0.35

0.00(79.9)

1.04(0.68~1.60)

0.86

0.06(46.8)

1.09(0.84 ~ 1.41)

0.52

0.00(80.1)

Non-smoker

8

1498/2336

1.25(0.90 ~ 1.75)

0.19

0.67(0.0)

1.05(0.91 ~ 1.21)

0.49

0.78(0.0)

1.08(0.94 ~ 1.23)

0.30

0.71(0.0)

1.24(0.89 ~ 1.72)

0.21

0.71(0.0)

1.08(0.96 ~ 1.22)

0.19

0.60(0.0)

  1. PB: population based; HB: hospital based. Pb: P-values for heterogeneity from Q test; I2 refers to the proportion of total variation owing to between-study heterogeneity.
  2. Bold font marks where fixed effect model used.