Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic parameters for survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

From: High expression of DDR1 is associated with the poor prognosis in Chinese patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Ā 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Prognostic parameter

RR

95 % CI

P value

RR

95 % CI

P value

DDR1 (low vs.high)

0.613

0.439ā€“0.857

0.004a

0.643

0.457ā€“0.904

0.011a

Age (<65 vs. ā‰„65)

1.460

1.066ā€“2.000

0.019a

1.533

1.107ā€“2.122

0.010a

Gender (male vs. female)

0.765

0.552ā€“1.058

0.105

Ā Ā Ā 

Tumor location (head vs. body/tail)

0.999

0.713ā€“1.399

0.996

Ā Ā Ā 

Size (ā‰¤2Ā cm vs. >2Ā cm)

1.641

0.978ā€“2.754

0.061

Ā Ā Ā 

Tumor differentiation (well vs. moderate/poor)

2.125

0.938ā€“4.813

0.071

Ā Ā Ā 

T classification (T1 vs. T2 vs. T3 vs. T4)

1.104

0.871ā€“1.400

0.412

Ā Ā Ā 

AJCC stage (I vs. II vs. III vs. IV)

1.260

0.992ā€“1.600

0.059

Ā Ā Ā 

N classification (absent vs. present)

1.811

1.290ā€“2.541

0.001a

1.769

1.242ā€“2.519

0.002a

Liver metastasis (absent vs. present)

3.299

1.746ā€“6.235

0.000a

2.748

1.419ā€“5.320

0.003a

Vascular invasion (absent vs. present)

1.492

0.955ā€“2.334

0.079

Ā Ā Ā 
  1. HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
  2. AJCC staging is according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system [29]
  3. aStatistical significant (Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05)