Genes | Fold change | TargetScan | miRanda | DIANA-microT |
---|
MTDH | 4.01 | Include | Include | Include |
CALU | 3.32 | Include | Include | Include |
SULF1 | 5.02 | Include | Exclude | Include |
FBXO32 | 8.03 | Exclude | Exclude | Include |
BZW2 | 3.99 | Exclude | Include | Exclude |
ABL2 | 2.15 | Exclude | Exclude | Include |
PLD3 | 4.11 | Exclude | Include | Exclude |
MLXIP | 2.05 | Exclude | Include | Exclude |
CERS2 | 2.45 | Exclude | Exclude | Exclude |
- Include: Prediction software package included the gene as a target of miR-let-7b and miR-let-7c. Exclude: Prediction software package excluded the gene as a target of miR-let-7b and miR-let-7c. Fold change: the mRNA expression level compared with negative control. Nine genes were upregulated among mucosal melanoma. Among the prediction software packages: miRNA, TargetScan, and DIANA-microT, 2 genes were predicted as targets of miR-let-7b and miR-let-7c with higher probability of preferential conservation. Although SULF1 was predicted as a target gene by TargetScan, its site had lower probability of preferential conservation