Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between MET and PD-L1 expressions and clinicopathological characteristics in PDAC patients

From: Combinational blockade of MET and PD-L1 improves pancreatic cancer immunotherapeutic efficacy

Characteristics

MET and PD-L1

MET and PD-L1

P value

low expression (N = 44)

high expression (N = 49)

Gender

  

0.523

 Male

28 (50 %)

28 (50 %)

 

 Female

16 (42.1 %)

21 (57.9 %)

 

Age

  

0.432

 ≤ 60 years

14 (53.8 %)

12 (46.2 %)

 

 > 60 years

30 (44.8 %)

37 (55.2 %)

 

BMI

  

0.664#

 < 18.5

4 (40 %)

6 (60 %)

 

 18.5–23.9

31 (50.8 %)

30 (49.2 %)

 

 > 23.9

9 (40.9 %)

13 (59.1 %)

 

Tumor location status

  

0.127

 Head and neck

35 (52.2 %)

32 (47.8 %)

 

 Body and tail

9 (34.6 %)

17 (65.4 %)

 

Tumor size status

  

0.501#

 ≤ 2 cm

5 (50 %)

5 (50 %)

 

 2 < n ≤ 4 cm

32 (50.8 %)

31 (49.2 %)

 

 > 4 cm

7 (35 %)

13 (65 %)

 

Lymph nodes involvement

  

0.034

 No

21 (61.8 %)

13 (38.2 %)

 

 Yes

23 (39 %)

36 (61 %)

 

TNM stage

  

0.020#

 I

15 (75 %)

5 (25 %)

 

 II

27 (39.7 %)

41 (60.2 %)

 

 III-IV

2 (40 %)

3 (60 %)

 

Tumor differentiation

  

0.869#

 Well differentiated

9 (60 %)

6 (40 %)

 

 Moderately differentiated

18 (42.9 %)

24 (57.1 %)

 

 Poorly differentiated

17 (47.2 %)

19 (52.8 %)

 

CA199

  

0.575

 ≤ 37

7 (41.2 %)

10 (58.8 %)

 

 > 37

37 (48.7 %)

39 (51.3 %)

 

CA125

  

0.597

 ≤ 35

33 (45.8 %)

39 (54.2 %)

 

 > 35

11 (52.4 %)

10 (47.6 %)

 

CEA

  

0.196

 ≤ 5

30 (52.6 %)

27 (47.4 %)

 

 > 5

14 (38.9 %)

22 (61.1 %)

 
  1. Data are presented as numbers and percentages (in parentheses) based on the total number of patients with tumors expressing high and low MET and PD-L1 levels. P values were determined using Chi-square tests. #, using Fisher’s exact test; P < 0.05, statistically significant