Open Access

CD44+/CD24- phenotype contributes to malignant relapse following surgical resection and chemotherapy in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma

  • Yan Lin1,
  • Ying Zhong1,
  • Heng Guan2,
  • Xiaohui Zhang1 and
  • Qiang Sun1Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201231:59

DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-31-59

Received: 17 April 2012

Accepted: 16 June 2012

Published: 4 July 2012

Abstract

Background

Invasive ductal carcinoma is the most common type of breast malignancy, with varying molecular features and resistance to treatment. Although CD44+/CD24- cells are believed to act as breast cancer stem cells and to be linked to poor prognosis in some patients, the association between these cells and tumor recurrence or metastasis in all or some types of invasive ductal carcinoma is unclear.

Methods

A total of 147 randomly selected primary and secondary invasive ductal carcinoma samples were assayed for expression of CD44, CD24, ER, PR, and Her2. The association between the proportions of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells and the clinico-pathological features of these patients was evaluated.

Results

CD44+/CD24- tumor cells were detected in 70.1% of the tumors, with a median proportion of 5.8%. The proportion of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells was significantly associated with lymph node involvement (P = 0.026) and PR status (P = 0.038), and was correlated with strong PR status in patients with recurrent or metastatic tumors (P = 0.046) and with basal-like features (p = 0.05). The median disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with and without CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells were 22.9 ± 2.2 months and 35.9 ± 3.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) of patients with and without CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells were 39.3 ± 2.6 months and 54.0 ± 3.5 months, respectively, and with both univariate and multivariate analyses showing that the proportion of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells was strongly correlated with DFS and OS.

Conclusion

The prevalence of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells varied greatly in invasive ductal carcinomas, with the occurrence of this phenotype high in primary tumors with high PR status and in secondary tumors. Moreover, this phenotype was significantly associated with shorter cumulative DFS and OS. Thus, the CD44+/CD24- phenotype may be an important factor for malignant relapse following surgical resection and chemotherapy in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.

Introduction

Invasive ductal carcinoma is the most common breast malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide.[1] Despite developments in surgical methods, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and agents targeted against estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2, a subset of patients with advanced stage invasive ductal carcinoma may experience tumor recurrence or metastasis within several years after treatment. It has been estimated that 11% of women with invasive ductal carcinoma will experience a recurrence within five years after surgery, including 8% of women with luminal A breast cancers and 15% of women with tumors having basal-like features.[2, 3] The cancer stem cell hypothesis was proposed to explore breast cancer heterogeneity and the risk of breast cancer recurrence, and these cell subpopulations may contribute to drug resistance that drives tumor recurrence or metastasis [4].

Using keratin profiling, Hoechst dye efflux, and flow cytometry analysis of cell surface markers such as CD44, CD24, CD133, epithelial cell adhesion molecule, and mucin-1,[5] normal human breast stem-cell like cells have been independently identified as showing elevated expression of CD44 and no expression of CD24 (CD44+/CD24-), as well as elevated levels of stem cell enriched genes.[6] The CD44+/CD24- subpopulation was believed to be putative stem cells in human breast tissue, enriched for basal cells and motility genes, which could be generated during the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Moreover, these cells were negative for mucin 1, estrogen receptor (ER), and v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (erbB2) receptor.[7, 8] More importantly, high expression of CD44+/CD24- cancer cells was associated with poor patient prognosis.[9] These cells had the phenotype of cancer cells during the epithelial to mesenchymal transition, [10] indicating that the gene expression pattern of CD44+/CD24- cells in breast cancers resembled more closely the pattern observed in CD44+/CD24- cells in normal breast than that of CD44-/CD24+ cells isolated from the same tumor.[6] Taken together, these findings indicated that CD44+/CD24- cells, especially those expressing epithelial cell adhesion molecule, were breast cancer stem cells (CSCs).[11] In contrast, breast cancer cells expressing elevated levels of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) were also described as breast CSCs, with ALDH1+/CD44+/CD24- cells displaying strong tumorigenic potential.[12] Moreover, breast CSCs were believed to constitute up to 35% of the cancer cells in a tumor, whereas these cells constituted only about 1% of stem and progenitor cells present in normal breast [13].

Although CD44+/CD24- cells were regarded as breast CSCs and to be linked with poor prognosis in some breast cancer patients, the association between these cells and tumor recurrence or metastasis in all or some patients with breast cancer, especially those with invasive ductal carcinoma, has been unclear. Despite the fact that all intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer have the same CSCs, tumor relapse has been found to differ among patients with different intrinsic subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma. Moreover, although CD44+/CD24- breast cancer cells have invasive properties, not all breast cancer cells with the CD44+/CD24- phenotype were able to grow as metastatic tumors whereas others showed aggressive metastatic growth.[14] In addition, although some primary tumors were predominantly CD44+, metastases at certain sites lacked any CD44 expression. [10] We therefore investigated whether breast cancer cells with the CD44+/CD24- phenotype are associated with the metastasis of different subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma, and whether breast cancer CD44+/CD24- cells possess essential characteristics of cells with a metastatic phenotype.

Materials and methods

Patients and specimens

A total of 147 invasive ductal carcinoma samples were randomly selected from our tissue database. Patients had been treated at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between April 2000 and December 2007. None of these patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Clinical information was obtained by reviewing preoperative and perioperative medical records, or by telephone or written correspondence. Patients were staged based on the tumor-node-metastases (TNM) classification of the International Union Against Cancer, revised in 2002.[15] The use of these human materials in this study was approved by the Peking Union Medical College Hospital Medical Ethics Committee.

Patient clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Fresh-frozen tumor tissue samples were used for routine determination of estrogen receptor (ER), progestogen receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (Her2). Paraffin specimens of these tumors were collected and 5 mm thick tissue sections were cut and fixed onto silicified slides. Each sample was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and histologically typed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification [16]. Tumor size and the number and location of metastatic lymph nodes were obtained from pathology reports. Basal-like features of tumor was defined as immunohistochemically negative for both SR and Her2.
Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with and without recurrence or metastasis

 

Without recurrence/metastasis

With recurrence/metastasis

P

N

56

91

 

Age (years)

50.8 ± 12.8 (13.0-77.0)

52.2 ± 12.4 (15.0-81.0)

0.510

Tumor size (cm)

3.2 ± 1.9 (1.2-9.5)

3.0 ± 1.6 (0.4-8.2)

0.437

Lymph node involvement

45 (80.4%)

70 (76.9%)

0.624

TNM stages

I

5 (8.9%)

9 (9.9%)

0.511

II

24 (42.9%)

32 (35.2%)

 

III

27 (48.2%)

49 (53.8%)

 

IV

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.1%)

 

ER expression

26 (46.4%)

31 (34.1%)

0.168

PR expression

28 (50.0%)

36 (39.6%)

0.266

Her2 expression

29 (51.8%)

41 (45.1%)

0.471

Basal-like feature*

9 (16.1%)

30 (33.0%)

0.018

Recurrence

 

40 (44.0%)

 

Metastasis

Skin

 

2 (2.2%)

 

Lung

 

20 (22.0%)

 

Liver

 

8 (8.8%)

 

Bones

 

11 (12.1%)

 

Brain

 

5 (5.5%)

 

Others

 

5 (5.5%)

 

ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; Her2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IDC, Invasive ductal carcinoma.

* Immunohistochemically negative for both SR and Her2.

Immunohistochemical staining and evaluation

Briefly, each tissue section was deparaffinized, rehydrated and incubated with fresh 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in methanol for 15 min. After rinsing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the samples were immersed in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and heated in a microwave oven at 100 °C for 15 min for antigen retrieval. Non-specific binding was blocked by incubating the sections with normal goat serum for 15 min at room temperature. The samples were subsequently incubated at 4 °C overnight with different primary antibodies. The primary antibodies used included rabbit polyclonal antibody to CD44 (CD44v6, IgG, 1:50, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse monoclonal to CD24 (IgG, 1:50, Thermo Electron Corp., Burlington, ON, CA), FITC linked mouse monoclonal antibody to SABC (1:50), and goat anti-rabbit Cy3 antibody (IgG, 1:20). CD44 was detected with permanent red and CD24 was detected with diaminobenzidine. ALDH1 was detected with a monoclonal rabbit anti-ALDH1 antibody (ALDH1A1, IgG, 1:100, Abcam) followed by EnVision™ on a Tech-Mate™ (DAKO). All slides were counterstained with hematoxylin to identify nuclei. All samples were scored twice by one person in a blinded fashion, with all unclear results discussed with a pathologist. If there were staining discrepancies among the three cores from the same patient, an average was used. CD44 staining was detected mainly in the membrane and CD24 staining was detected mainly in the cytoplasm. The proportion of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells was defined as the percentage of cells positive for permanent red staining but negative for diaminobenzidine staining. The results of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells proportion were classified into two groups, high and low, with a cut-off value based on the median value of their proportion.

Statistical analysis

All calculations were performed using SPSS V.14.0 statistical software (Chicago, IL, USA). Associations between the presence of CD44, CD24 or different CD44/CD24 phenotypes and clinical variables as well as breast cancer subgroups were assessed by Fisher's exact test, except for age where the Mann–Whitney U test was used. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the prognostic effect on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and the log-rank test to compare survival between two strata. Hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed to provide quantitative information about the relevance of the results of statistical analysis. All tests were two-sided and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

The baseline characteristics of the study population are given in Table 1. All patients were female, with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 51.6 ± 12.5 years (range, 13.5 to 80.7 years) and a mean ± SD tumor size of 3.1 ± 1.8 cm (range, 0.4 to 9.5 cm). Lymph node involvement was positive in 115 patients (78.2%). According to TNM classification, 14 patients (9.5%) were stage I, 56 (38.1%) were stage II, 76 (51.7%) were stage III, and 1 (0.7%) was stage IV. Of the 147 patients, 57 (38.8%) were positive for ER expression, 64 (43.5%) were positive for PR, 70 (47.6%) were positive for Her2, and 39 (26.5%) were positive for basal-like features (defined as immunohistochemically negative for both SR and Her2). Of the 147 patients, 87 (59.2%) were received adjuvant chemotherapy and 95 (64.6%) were received agents targeted against estrogen receptor. Median follow-up time was 23.0 months (range, 2 to 91 months), during which 40 patients (27.2%) experienced tumor recurrence and 51 (34.7%) developed metastases.

Presence of CD44+/CD24- phenotype in invasive ductal carcinoma tissue

The presence of CD44 and CD24 antigens on invasive ductal carcinoma tissues was analyzed using double-staining immunohistochemistry. Figure 1 displays representative staining patterns of CD44 and CD24. CD44 was visible primarily as membranous permanent red staining, with only eight tumors displaying cytoplasmic and membranous staining. CD24 was visible mainly as cytoplasmic diaminobenzidine staining, with only six tumors displaying membrane diaminobenzidine staining. To determine the proportion of tumorigenic CD44+/CD24- cells within each tumor, we scanned for the presence of permanent red staining without any diaminobenzidine interference. CD44+/CD24- tumor cells were present in 103 of the 147 (70.1%) tumors, but absent from the other 44 (29.9%), with the proportion of tumor cells expressing this phenotype ranging from a few to 70%, with a median proportion of 5.8%, and this median proportion was selected to categorize patients as CD44+/CD24- tumor cells high group and CD44+/CD24- tumor cells low group according to cutoff definition. The frequency of tumors with different proportions of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells is presented in Table 2. The proportions of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells in clinical specimens correlated significantly with lymph node involvement (P = 0.026) and PR expression (P = 0.038). Higher proportions of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells were observed in specimens from patients with (19.20%) than without (8.66%) lymph node involvement and with (21.06%) than without (13.09%) PR expression. There were no associations between percentage of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells and patient age, tumor size, TNM stages, ER or Her2 expression, and basal-like features.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-9966-31-59/MediaObjects/13046_2012_Article_582_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Immunohistochemical staining for CD44, CD24, and DAPI (×400).

Table 2

Proportion of all patients and patients with recurrence/metastasis and CD44/CD24 data with CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells

 

n

All cases (%)

P

n

Recurrence/metastatic cases (%)

P*

Age (years)

< 50

74

18.34 ± 2.70

0.444

34

24.91 ± 3.79

0.022

≥ 50

73

15.45 ± 2.66

 

38

13.20 ± 3.32

 

Tumor size

T1

47

15.78 ± 2.86

0.224

15

13.19 ± 3.53

 

T2

76

20.12 ± 2.90

 

44

23.78 ± 3.68

 

T3 + T4

17

10.27 ± 4.46

 

13

11.83 ± 6.60

0.152

Lymph node involvement

Absent

32

8.66 ± 2.70

0.026

18

10.00 ± 3.77

0.075

Present

115

19.20 ± 2.29

 

54

21.53 ± 3.19

 

TNM stage

I + II

70

15.87 ± 2.63

0.500

33

16.88 ± 3.74

0.368

III + IV

77

18.49 ± 2.81

 

39

21.73 ± 3.79

 

ER expression

Negative

90

16.49 ± 2.47

0.845

47

18.92 ± 3.17

0.944

Positive

57

17.26 ± 3.07

 

25

19.32 ± 4.81

 

PR expression

Negative

83

13.09 ± 2.41

0.038

43

14.63 ± 3.06

0.046

Positive

64

21.06 ± 2.98

 

29

25.32 ± 4.51

 

Her2 expression

Negative

77

16.18 ± 3.03

0.566

38

17.36 ± 4.17

0.441

Positive

70

18.47 ± 2.61

 

34

21.57 ± 3.47

 

Basal-like feature

Absent

108

18.44 ± 2.24

0.143

49

11.70 ± 4.07

0.050

Present

39

11.93 ± 3.66

 

23

22.66 ± 3.30

 

Recurrence or metastasis

Absent

75

14.26 ± 2.72

0.246

   

Present

72

18.73 ± 2.58

    

Lesions in recurrence/metastatic patients

Primary

   

56

15.39 ± 2.63

0.014

Secondary

   

16

30.41 ± 6.46

 

* Calculated by t tests. ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; Her2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

Immunohistochemically negative for both SR and Her2.

Association of CD44+/CD24- phenotype with steroid receptor status

Of the 121 samples with CD44/CD24 data, 56 (46.2%) were positive for PR expression. CD44+/CD24- status was significantly correlated with strong PR staining in all patients (P = 0.038) and in samples from patients with recurrence or metastasis (P = 0.046). Interestingly, although ER expression was observed in 50 of the 121 (41.3%) patients with CD44/CD24 data, the presence of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells was not significantly correlated with positive ER expression in all patients and in patients with recurrence or metastasis.

Association of CD44+/CD24- phenotype with basal-like feature

We found that the proportion of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells was similar in breast cancer samples with and without basal-like features (11.93% versus 18.44%, p = 0.143). However, in samples from patients with tumor recurrence or metastasis, the proportion of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells was significantly higher in breast cancer tissue with basal-like features than in tissue without such features (22.66% versus 17.70%, p = 0.05).

Association of CD44+/CD24- phenotype with DFS and OS: univariate analysis and multivariate analysis

The results of univariate analyses of the associations between each individual predictor and DFS are shown in Table 3. The proportion of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells (P = 0.002), PR status (P = 0.004), basal-like feature (P = 0.007), and TNM stage (P = 0.029) were strongly correlated with DFS. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the presence of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells was significantly associated with shorter DFS compared with the absence of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells (22.9 ± 2.2 months versus 35.9 ± 3.8 months; Pearson chi-square, 10.696, p = 0.001; Figure 2A). When all predictors were included in a Cox model (multivariate analysis, Table 3), the presence of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells (hazard ratio, 1.931; P = 0.011), PR status, basal-like feature, and TNM stage retained their prognostic significance for DFS.
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the relationship of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells to disease-free survival

Variable

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR

95% CI

p-value

HR

95% CI

p-value

CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells

High

2.144

1.321-3.479

0.002

1.963

1.163-3.313

0.012

Low

1.000

  

1.000

  

ER status

Positive

0.826

0.524-1.304

0.412

1.425

0.731-2.776

0.298

Negative

1.000

  

1.000

  

PR status

Positive

0.500

0.312–0.800

0.004

0.192

0.088–0.420

0.001

Negative

1.000

  

1.000

  

Her2 status

Positive

0.966

0.614–1.521

0.882

0.692

0.317–1.513

0.357

Negative

1.000

  

1.000

  

Basal-like feature*

Present

2.731

0.461-1.393

0.007

3.902

1.402-10.859

0.009

Absent

1.000

  

1.000

  

TNM stage

Stage III/IV

1.989

0.814–2.626

0.029

1.820

1.051–3.151

0.033

Stage I/II

1.000

  

1.000

  

Lymph node involvement

Absent

0.724

0.427-1.227

0.230

1.081

0.540-2.164

0.827

Present

1.000

  

1.000

  

Age (years)

≥ 50

1.047

0.681–1.610

0.883

1.062

0.627–1.799

0.822

< 50

1.000

  

1.000

  

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio estimated from Cox proportional hazard regression model; CI, confidence interval of the estimated HR. ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; Her2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

* Immunohistochemically negative for both SR and Her2.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-9966-31-59/MediaObjects/13046_2012_Article_582_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) in breast cancer patients with and without the CD44+/CD24- phenotype. A. All patients; B. Patients with invasive ductal carcinoma; C. Progesterone receptor (PR) negative patients; D. PR positive patients; E. Estrogen receptor (ER) negative patients; F. ER positive patients; G. Her2 negative patients; H. Her2 positive patients; I. Patients with basal-like features; J. Patients not receiving postoperative immunotherapy; K. Patients receiving postoperative immunotherapy.

Meanwhile, the results of univariate analyses of the associations between each individual predictor and OS are shown in Table 4. Similarly with the relation with DFS, the proportion of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells (P = 0.001), basal-like feature (P = 0.029), and TNM stage (P = 0.027) were strongly correlated with OS. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the presence of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells was significantly associated with shorter OS compared with the absence of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells (39.3 ± 2.6 months versus 54.0 ± 3.5 months; Pearson chi-square, 12.140, p = 0.001). When all predictors were included in a Cox model (multivariate analysis, Table 4), the presence of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells (hazard ratio, 2.237; P = 0.002), basal-like feature, and TNM stage retained their prognostic significance for OS.
Table 4

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the relationship of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells to overall survival

Variable

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR

95% CI

p-value

HR

95% CI

p-value

CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells

High

2.193

1.383-3.477

0.001

2.237

1.345-3.720

0.002

Low

1.000

  

1.000

  

ER status

Positive

0.757

0.488-1.175

0.215

1.164

0.585-2.314

0.665

Negative

1.000

  

1.000

  

PR status

Positive

0.702

0.457–1.078

0.106

0.968

0.496–1.888

0.924

Negative

1.000

  

1.000

  

Her2 status

Positive

0.932

0.605–1.435

0.748

1.583

0.782–3.201

0.201

Negative

1.000

  

1.000

  

Basal-like feature*

Present

0.608

0.389-0.949

0.029

0.342

0.131-0.891

0.028

Absent

1.000

  

1.000

  

TNM stage

Stage III/IV

1.614

1.055–2.470

0.027

1.652

1.014–2.690

0.044

Stage I/II

1.000

  

1.000

  

Lymph node involvement

Absent

0.891

0.528-1.504

0.666

0.674

0.343-1.323

0.251

Present

1.000

  

1.000

  

Age (years)

≥ 50

1.110

0.735–1.676

0.621

1.384

0.847–2.260

0.194

< 50

1.000

  

1.000

  

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio estimated from Cox proportional hazard regression model; CI, confidence interval of the estimated HR. ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; Her2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

* Immunohistochemically negative for both SR and Her2.

Presence of CD44+/CD24- phenotype in secondary invasive ductal carcinoma

We separately analyzed the secondary lesions from 56 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma and metastasis or recurrence. We found that a significantly higher proportion of secondary than primary lesions were positive for CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells (26.9% versus 7.0%, P < 0.05).

Discussion

Invasive ductal carcinoma is the most common breast malignancy in women, with relapse or metastasis frequently occurring after surgical resection. CD44+/CD24- breast cancer cells have been reported to have tumor-initiating properties.[17, 18] We therefore investigated the importance of this breast CSC phenotype in the relapse and metastasis of invasive ductal carcinoma cells. Breast CSCs have been reported to constitute up to 35% of cancer cells in a tumor, compared with approximately 1% of stem and progenitor cells present in normal breast. [13] However, the size of the CSC pool in breast cancers is unclear, since one study showed that CSCs constitute less than 10% of cells in 78% of breast tumors,[19] whereas another study found that CD44+/CD24- cells were present in all breast cancer samples. We therefore determined the percentage of CD44+/CD24- cells in tissue samples from 147 invasive ductal carcinomas. We found that the size of the CSC pool ranged from 0% to 70%, with a median of 5.8%, and that CSCs constituted less than 22% of the cells in 75% of primary tumors. In contrast, tumor cells with this phenotype have been reported in 31% of primary breast tumors. This discrepancy may be due to different subtypes of breast cancers and different percentages of samples from primary and metastatic breast tumors.

Although CD44+/CD24- percentage was not associated with ER or HER2 expression, we observed an association between high CD44+/CD24- percentage and PR expression. This linkage was more prominent in samples from recurrent and metastatic tumors with more than 25% CD44+/CD24- cells. In contrast, previous studies showed that the presence of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells was not associated with ER or PR status [20].

CD44+/CD24- cells have been observed in 63% of basal-like subtype (SR-HER2- basal-like) breast tumors.[20] Although we did not observe a significant difference in the proportion of CD44+/CD24- cells in samples from tumors with and without basal-like features, we found that the CD44+/CD24- subpopulation was higher in samples of recurrent and metastatic tumors with basal-like features. Several studies have shown an association between CD44+/CD24- cells and the metastasis of basal-like breast cancers. For example, the expression of several metastasis-associated genes was found to be higher in cells with than without the CD44+/CD24- phenotype, and only malignant cell lines with the CD44+/CD24- subpopulation were able to invade matrigel, indicating that CD44+/CD24- cancer cells are more metastatic than non-CD44+/CD24- cells [21, 22].

Importantly, a unique 186-gene invasiveness gene signature has been observed in CD44+/CD24- malignant cells,[22] linking the presence of CD44+/CD24- cells to distant metastasis although not to survival.[8, 23] We found that the time to tumor relapse (including recurrence and metastasis) was significantly shorter in patients with than without CD44+/CD24- tumor cells. Metastasis is a complex process involving invasion, intravasation, survival in the blood stream, extravasation and homing and proliferation at the sites of metastasis.[8, 24, 25] The poor prognosis of patients with primary tumors having higher levels of CD44+/CD24- cells, but whose metastatic cells had the CD44±/CD24+ phenotype,[26, 27] suggests that CD44+/CD24- tumor cells may be a transient phenotype and that these cells have an intrinsic program to transition to a phenotype that enhances their heterotypic interaction and survival/proliferation in distant organs.[8] This hypothesis, however, cannot explain the difference in time to tumor relapse in patients with and without CD44+/CD24- cancer cells who had undergone surgical resection plus immunotherapy.

Conclusion

We observed variations in the prevalence of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells in breast tumors of different subtypes. This phenotype was highly prevalent in primary tumors with high PR expression and in secondary tumors. These results provide further evidence for the biological heterogeneity of breast cancers and for the enrichment in putative tumor-initiating cells in tumors with high PR expression and in secondary tumors. Moreover, the presence of CD44+/CD24-/low tumor cells was associated with a shorter cumulative DFS and OS, suggesting that the CD44+/CD24- phenotype may be an important factor of malignant relapse in patients with surgically resected invasive ductal carcinoma after chemotherapy.

Notes

Abbreviations

ALDH1: 

aldehyde dehydrogenase

CSC: 

cancer stem cell

DAB: 

3,3'-diaminobenzidine

DAPI: 

4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

DFS: 

disease free survival

EDTA: 

ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid

EFS: 

event free survival

EGFR: 

epidermal growth factor receptor

ER: 

estrogen receptor

FITC: 

fluorescein isothiocyanate

IQR: 

interquartile-range

HER-2: 

human epidermal growth factor receptor

IHC: 

immunohistochemistry

LN: 

lymph node

NTP: 

nucleoside triphosphate

PBS: 

phosphate buffered saline

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

PR: 

progestogen receptor

SP: 

side population

SR: 

steroid receptor

RNase: 

ribonuclease.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Breast Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College
(2)
Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010, 60: 277-300. 10.3322/caac.20073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ozbay T, Nahta R: Delphinidin inhibits HER2 and Erk1/2 signaling and suppresses growth of HER2-overexpressing and triple negative breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research. 2011, 5: 143-154.Google Scholar
  3. Voduc KD, Cheang MC, Tyldesley S, Gelmon K, Nielsen TO, Kennecke H: Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 1684-1691. 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL: Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001, 414: 105-111. 10.1038/35102167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nakshatri H, Srour EF, Badve S: Breast cancer stem cells and intrinsic subtypes: controversies rage on. Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2009, 4: 50-60. 10.2174/157488809787169110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Shipitsin M, Campbell LL, Argani P, Weremowicz S, Bloushtain-Qimron N, Yao J, Nikolskaya T, Serebryiskaya T, Beroukhim R, Hu M, Halushka MK, Sukumar S, Parker LM, Anderson KS, Harris LN, Garber JE, Richardson AL, Schnitt SJ, Nikolsky Y, Gelman RS, Polyak K: Molecular definition of breast tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Cell. 2007, 11: 259-273. 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.01.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, Brooks M, Reinhard F, Zhang CC, Shipitsin M, Campbell LL, Polyak K, Brisken C, Yang J, Weinberg RA: The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008, 133: 704-715. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ: Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8: 755-768. 10.1038/nrc2499.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T, Quist H, Matese JC, Brown PO, Botstein D, Lønning PE, Børresen-Dale A: Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 10869-10874. 10.1073/pnas.191367098.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sheridan C, Kishimoto H, Fuchs RK, Mehrotra S, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Turner CH, Goulet R, Badve S, Nakshatri H: CD44+/CD24- breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties: an early step necessary for metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. 2006, 8: R59-10.1186/bcr1610.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF: Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 3983-3988. 10.1073/pnas.0530291100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, Jacquemier J, Viens P, Kleer C, Liu S, Schott A, Hayes D, Birnbaum D, Wicha MS, Dontu G: ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 2007, 1: 555-567. 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.014.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Raouf A, Zhao Y, To K, Stingl J, Delaney A, Barbara M, Iscove N, Jones S, McKinney S, Emerman J, Aparicio S, Marra M, Eaves C: Transcriptome analysis of the normal human mammary cell commitment and differentiation process. Cell Stem Cell. 2008, 3: 109-118. 10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mylona E, Giannopoulou I, Fasomytakis E, Nomikos A, Magkou C, Bakarakos P, Nakopoulou L: The clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of CD44+/CD24(−/low) and CD44-/CD24+ tumor cells in invasive breast carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2008, 39 (7): 1096-1102. 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.12.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. UICC: International Union Against Cancer (UICC), TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 2002, Wiley-Liss, New York, 6 ednGoogle Scholar
  16. Devilee P, Tavassoli FA: World Health Organization: Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford [Oxfordshire]Google Scholar
  17. Ponti D, Costa A, Zaffaroni N, Pratesi G, Petrangolini G, Coradini D, Pilotti S, Pierotti MA, Daidone MG: Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 5506-5511. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0626.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Yeung TM, Gandhi SC, Wilding JL, Muschel R, Bodmer WF: Cancer stem cells from colorectal cancer-derived cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010, 107: 3722-3727. 10.1073/pnas.0915135107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Abraham BK, Fritz P, McClellan M, Hauptvogel P, Athelogou M, Brauch H: Prevalence of CD44+/CD24-/low cells in breast cancer may not be associated with clinical outcome but may favor distant metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (3): 1154-1159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Honeth G, Bendahl P, Ringnér M, Saal LH, Gruvberger-Saal SK, Lövgren K, Grabau D, Fernö M, Borg A, Hegardt C: The CD44+/CD24- phenotype is enriched in basal-like breast tumors. Breast Cancer Research. 2008, 10: R53-10.1186/bcr2108.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Charafe-Jauffret E, Ginestier C, Birnbaum D: Breast cancer stem cells: tools and models to rely on. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 202-10.1186/1471-2407-9-202.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu R, Wang X, Chen GY, Dalerba P, Gurney A, Hoey T, Sherlock G, Lewicki J, Shedden K, Clarke MF: The prognostic role of a gene signature from tumorigenic breast-cancer cells. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356: 217-226. 10.1056/NEJMoa063994.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhou L, Jiang Y, Yan T, Di G, Shen Z, Shao Z, Lu J: The prognostic role of cancer stem cells in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published literatures. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2010, 122: 795-801. 10.1007/s10549-010-0999-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Eccles SA, Welch DR: Metastasis: recent discoveries and novel treatment strategies. Lancet. 2007, 369: 1742-1757. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60781-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lopez JL, Camenisch TD, Stevens MV, Sands BJ, McDonald J, Schroeder JA: CD44 attenuates metastatic invasion during breast cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 6755-6763. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fillmore CM, Kuperwasser C: Human breast cancer cell lines contain stem-like cells that self-renew, give rise to phenotypically diverse progeny and survive chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2008, 10: R25-10.1186/bcr1982.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Louie E, Nik S, Chen J, Schmidt M, Song B, Pacson C, Chen XF, Park S, Ju J, Chen EI: Identification of a stem-like cell population by exposing metastatic breast cancer cell lines to repetitive cycles of hypoxia and reoxygenation. Breast Cancer Research. 2010, 12: R94-10.1186/bcr2773.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.