Piroxicam and intracavitary platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced mesothelioma in pets: preliminary observations
© Spugnini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 03 May 2008
Accepted: 19 May 2008
Published: 19 May 2008
Malignant Mesothelioma is an uncommon and very aggressive tumor that accounts for 1% of all the deaths secondary to malignancy in humans. Interestingly, this neoplasm has been occasionally described in companion animals as well. Aim of this study was the preclinical evaluation of the combination of piroxicam with platinum-based intracavitary chemotherapy in pets. Three companion animals have been treated in a three years period with this combination. Diagnosis was obtained by ultrasonographic exam of the body cavities that evidenced thickening of the mesothelium. A surgical biopsy further substantiated the diagnosis. After drainage of the malignant effusion from the affected cavity, the patients received four cycles of intracavitary CDDP at the dose of 50 mg/m2 every three weeks if dogs or four cycles of intracavitary carboplatin at the dose of 180 mg/m2 (every 3 weeks) if cats, coupled with daily administration of piroxicam at the dose of 0.3 mg/kg. The therapy was able to arrest the effusion in all patients for variable remission times: one dog is still in remission after 3 years, one dog died of progressive disease after 8 months and one cat died due to progressive neoplastic growth after six months, when the patient developed a mesothelial cuirass. The combination showed remarkable efficacy at controlling the malignant effusion secondary to MM in our patients and warrants further investigations.
Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare, highly aggressive tumor, accounting for less than 1% of all cancer deaths in the world . This neoplasm arises from the surface serosal cells of the pleural (> 90% of cases), peritoneal, and pericardial cavities and from the tunica vaginalis of the testis . Several epidemiological and clinicopathological studies have shown a correlation between exposure to asbestos and development of pleural mesothelioma ; nevertheless, the exact mechanism whereby asbestos induces the mesothelioma is still unknown [4, 5]. Interestingly, recent studies have proposed a role for Simian Virus 40 large T antigen (SV40-Tag) in the pathogenesis of human mesothelioma, but there are discordant opinions in the scientific literature [6–8] Due to the low incidence of the disease, only few randomized studies have been performed [reviewed in ]. The prognosis is generally poor with a reported median survival of 4 to 12 months in either untreated or treated (surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy) patients . Moreover, mesothelioma has proven resistant to classical chemotherapeutic and radiation regimes and the natural history has not been influenced by standard therapy . Various drugs have been tested in different combinations so far; among the most commonly employed are doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin (CDDP), carboplatin, gemcitabine, and pemetrexed [11–15]. Of interest, the combination of these drugs, with the exception of pemetrexed, does not appear to provide any clear advantage over mono-therapy . Therefore, there is need of more effective therapies, possibly based on the most recent discoveries on the molecular events involved in mesothelioma pathogenesis and progression. Our research group has recently demonstrated that piroxicam, a commonly used NSAID and COX-inhibitor, has the capability to potentiate the chemotherapic effects of cisplatin on mesothelioma cells, both in vitro and in vivo . This tumor has been infrequently reported in dogs  and even more rarely described in cats [18–24]. Moreover, treatment has been limited to palliation with corticosteroids or repeated drainage of malignant effusion, or intracavitary platinum coumpounds [24, 25].
A recent study in a mouse model has suggested a potential synergic action between piroxicam and platinum compounds for the treatment of orthotopic mesothelioma xenografts .
Materials and methods
Privately owned companion animals (two dogs and one cat) with MM were enrolled to receive the combination of platinum compounds and piroxicam.
MM was diagnosed by means of ultrasonographic examination confirmed by histopathologically examination of biopsy specimens.
After tumor biopsy or debulking, dogs received daily piroxicam at the dose of 0.3 mg/kg PO for 4 months and CDDP at the dose of 50 mg/m2 every three weeks intraperitoneally, for a total of four doses. The patients had a complete blood cell count, biochemical profile and urinalysis performed 7 days after each chemotherapy. A ultrasonographic exam was performed on a monthly basis to check for effusion secondary to malignancy.
The cat was treated with injectable piroxicam, (in order to better dose the drug), given at the dose of 0.3 mg/kg SC every other day  for 4 months and carboplatin at the dose of 180 mg/m2 (every 3 weeks) for a total of four doses. Carboplatin was chosen since systemic administration of CDDP causes fatal pulmonary edema in cats . The patient had a complete blood cell count, biochemical profile and urinalysis performed 7 days after each chemotherapy. A ultrasonographic exam was performed on a monthly basis to check for effusion secondary to malignancy.
Individual data and response to therapy in 3 pets with Malignant Mesothelioma
As with humans, pets cannot be cured of MM . As with humans with down-staged MM at the time of diagnosis, surgical excision can only be rarely performed in pets . The only exception to this rule may be pericardial MM, where successful palliation can sometimes be achieved by total or partial pericardiectomy, relieving the hemodynamic problems caused by tamponade [27, 28]. Systemic chemotherapy using mitoxantrone or doxorubicin has been limited to case reports or to small series. Its effectiveness has been limited when used as single modality, while its use as an adjunct to cytoreduction (especially pericardiectomy) has led to reports of prolonged tumour control [29–31]. Probably the best use of chemotherapy for canine mesothelioma is still confined to palliation for advanced disease by means of intracavitary instillation. This approach is well tolerated and is capable of significantly decrease the amount of fluid released by the mesothelioma, furthermore it seems to induce tumor shrinking for a limited amount of time. A review of the literature showed that, in a small cohort of 6 dogs, treatment with intracavitary cisplatin resulted in survival times approaching one year in 5 patients . Unfortunately the low penetration of the drug within the mesothelial layers (2–3 mm in depth) limits its usefulness in case of bulky disease. The use of other drugs such as tetracycline, talk, or bleomycin (Spugnini EP, personal observation) to induce pleurodesis has been unrewarding [32, 33]. Our protocol showed to be highly tolerable by our patients and proved to successfully palliate the malignant effusion secondary to MM in two pets and was capable to induce a long term control in the third. Interestingly, none of the dogs had haematological or gastrointestinal toxicities, in particular vomiting that is one of the limiting factors to the use of cisplatin in dogs. Also the cat tolerated the therapy without side effects.
In conclusion, considering that there are not established chemotherapy protocols for pets with MM, the combination of intracavitary platinum compounds coupled with piroxicam should be further evaluated, also in view of the many similarities shared by canine and feline MM with that of humans. In fact, it has been shown in several research articles that veterinary cancer patients should be considered valuable models for the study of novel approaches such as chemosensitizers, immune modulators, imaging studies and new delivery systems for loco-regional therapy . However, results should be evaluated with caution since it's likely that MM has a more benign biological course in dogs than it does in people and this has to be considered in evaluating uncontrolled case reports of 1 year survival in the dog.
This work has been supported by "Grant 2006" and "PROJECT FIRB/MUR (RBIPO6LCA9-009) Grant"of the Italian Ministry of Health to E.P.S and G.C., and by grants from FUTURA-onlus, AIRC, MIUR, Ministry of Health and Second University of Naples to A.B.
- Robinson BWS, Musk AW, Lake RA: Malignant mesothelioma. The Lancet. 2005, 366: 397-408. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67025-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peto J, Decarli A, La Vecchia C, Levi F, Negri E: The European mesothelioma epidemic. Br J Cancer. 1999, 79: 666-672. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mossman BT, Chung A: Mechanisms in the pathogenesis of asbestosis and silicosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998, 157: 1666-80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spugnini EP, Bosari S, Citro G, Cognetti F, Baldi A: Human malignant mesothelioma: Molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis and progression. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006, 38: 2000-2004. 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spugnini EP, Campioni M, D'Avino A, Caruso G, Citro G, Baldi A: Cell cycle molecules in mesothelioma: an overview. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 26: 443-449.Google Scholar
- Carbone M, Rdzanek MA, Rudzinski JJ, De Marco MA, Bocchetta M, Ramos Nino M, Mossman B, Pass HI: SV40 detection in human tumor specimens. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 10120-10121. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1911.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Luca A, Baldi A, Esposito V, Howard CM, Bagella L, Rizzo P, Caputi M, Pass HI, Giordano GG, Baldi F, Carbone M, Giordano A: The retinoblastoma gene family pRb/p105, p107, pRb2/p130 and simian virus-40 large T-antigen in human mesotheliomas. Nat Med. 1997, 3: 913-916. 10.1038/nm0897-913.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manfredi JJ, Dong J, Liu WJ, Resnick-Silverman L, Qiao R, Chahinian P, Saric M, Gibbs AR, Phillips JI, Murray J, Axten CW, Nolan RP, Aaronson SA: Evidence against a role for SV40 in human mesothelioma. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 2602-2609. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2461.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tomek S, Manegold C: Chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2003, 15: 148-56. 10.1097/00001622-200303000-00006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Curran D, Sahmoud T, Therasse P, Van meerbeeck J, Postmus PE, Giaccone G: Prognostic factors in patients with pleural mesothelioma: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer experience. J Clin Oncol. 1998, 16: 145-52.Google Scholar
- Chahinian AP, Antman K, Goutsou M, Corson JM, Suzuki Y, Modeas C, Herndon JE, Aisner J, Ellison RR, Leone L: Randomized phase II trial of CDDP with mitomycin or doxorubicin for malignant mesothelioma by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol. 1993, 11: 1559-65.Google Scholar
- Samson MK, Wasser LP, Borden EC, Wanebo HJ, Creech RH, Phillips M, Baker LH: Randomized comparison of cyclophosphamide, imidazole carboxamide, and adriamycin versus cyclophosphamide and adriamycin in patients with advanced stage malignant mesothelioma: a Sarcoma Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol. 1987, 5: 86-91.Google Scholar
- White SC, Anderson H, Jayson GC, Ashcroft L, Ranson M, Thatcher N: Randomised phase II study of CDDP-etoposide versus infusional carboplatin in advanced non small-cell lung cancer and mesothelioma. Ann Oncol. 2000, 11: 201-206. 10.1023/A:1008328605413.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hughes A, Calvert P, Azzabi A, Plummer R, Johnson R, Rusthoven J, Griffin M, Fishwick K, Boddy AV, Verrill M, Calvert H: Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 3422-44. 10.1200/JCO.2002.10.073.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kindler HL, Millard F, Herndon JE, Vogelzang NJ, Suzuki Y, Green MR: Gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma: a phase II trial by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Lung Cancer. 2001, 31: 311-317. 10.1016/S0169-5002(00)00166-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spugnini EP, Cardillo I, Verdina A, Crispi S, Saviozzi S, Calogero R, Nebbioso A, Altucci L, Cortese G, Galati R, Chien J, Shridhar V, Vincenzi B, Citro G, Cognetti F, Sacchi A, Baldi A: Piroxicam and cisplatin in a mouse model of peritoneal mesothelioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 6133-6143. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Head KW, Else RW, Dubielzig RR: Tumours of serosal surfaces. Tumors of domestic Animals. Edited by: Meuten DJ. 2002, Iowa State Press, Ames, 365-399. 4Google Scholar
- Raflo CP, Nuernberger SP: Abdominal mesothelioma in a cat. Vet Pathol. 1978, 15: 781-783.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akiyama K, Suzuki Y: A case of feline peritoneal mesothelioma with psammoma bodies. Jpn. J Vet Sci. 1982, 44: 975-979.Google Scholar
- Bacci B, Morandi F, De Meo M, Marcato PS: Ten cases of feline mesothelioma: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. J Comp Pathol. 2006, 134: 347-354. 10.1016/j.jcpa.2006.02.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kobayashi Y, Usuda H, Ochiai K, Itakura C: Malignant mesothelioma with metastases and mast cell leukaemia in a cat. J Comp Pathol. 1994, 111: 453-458. 10.1016/S0021-9975(05)80103-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rinke M, Rosenbruch M: Pleural mesothelioma in a young cat. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2003, 110 (4): 177-178.Google Scholar
- Suzuki Y, Sugimura M, Atoji Y, Akiyama K: Lymphatic metastasis in a case of feline peritoneal mesothelioma. Jpn J Vet Sci. 1985, 47: 511-516.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sparkes A, Murphy S, McConnell F, Smith K, Blunden AS, Papasouliotis K, Vanthournout D: Palliative intracavitary carboplatin therapy in a cat with suspected pleural mesothelioma. J Feline Med Surg. 2005, 7 (5): 313-316. 10.1016/j.jfms.2005.03.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moore AS, Kirk C, Cardona A: Intracavitary cisplatin chemotherapy experience with six dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 1991, 5: 227-31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Donald Plumb , Ed: Plumb's Veterinary Drug Handbook. 2005, Ames, Blackwell Publishing, 5Google Scholar
- Kerstetter KK, Krahwinkel DJ, Millis DL, Hahn K: Pericardiectomy in dogs: 22 cases (1986–1996). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997, 211: 736-740.Google Scholar
- Jackson J, Richter K, Launer D: Thoracoscopic partial pericardiectomy in 13 dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 1999, 13: 529-533. 10.1892/0891-6640(1999)013<0529:TPPID>2.3.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogilvie GK, Obradovich JE, Elmslie RE, Vail DM, Moore AS, Straw RC, Dickinson K, Cooper MF, Withrow SJ: Efficacy of mitoxantrone against various neoplasms in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991, 198: 1618-1621.Google Scholar
- Ogilvie GK, Reynolds HA, Richardson RC, Withrow SJ, Norris AM, Henderson RA, Klausner JS, Fowler JD, McCaw D: Phase II evaluation of doxorubicin for treatment of various canine neoplasms. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989, 195: 1580-1583.Google Scholar
- Stepien RL, Whitley NW, Dubielzig RR: Idiopathic or mesothelioma-related pericardial effusion: clinical findings and survival in 17 dogs (1983–1996). J Small Anim Pract. 2000, 41: 342-347. 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2000.tb03215.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gallagher LA, Birchard SJ, Weisbrode SE: Effects of tetracycline hydrochloride on pleurae in dogs with induced pleural effusion. Am J Vet Res. 1990, 51: 1682-1687.Google Scholar
- Birchard SJ, Gallagher L: Use of pleurodesis in treating selected pleural diseases. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet. 1988, 10: 826-832.Google Scholar
- Porrello A, Cardelli P, Spugnini EP: Oncology of companion animals as a model for humans. an overview of tumor histotypes. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 25: 97-105.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.