Enhancement of cisplatin sensitivity in lewis lung carcinoma by liposome-mediated delivery of a survivin mutant
- Dan-Dan Yu†1, 2,
- Chun-Ting Wang†1Email author,
- Hua-Shan Shi1,
- Zhi-Yong Li1,
- Li Pan1,
- Qing-Zhong Yuan1,
- Fei Leng1,
- Yuan Wen1,
- Xiang Chen1 and
- Yu-Quan Wei1
© Yu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 5 February 2010
Accepted: 12 May 2010
Published: 12 May 2010
A high concentration of cisplatin (CDDP) induces apoptosis in many tumor cell lines. CDDP has been administered by infusion to avoid severe toxicity. Recently, it has been reported that changes in survivin expression or function may lead to tumor sensitization to chemical and physical agents. The aim of this study was to determine whether a dominant-negative mouse survivin mutant could enhance the anti-tumor activity of CDDP.
A plasmid encoding the phosphorylation-defective dominant-negative mouse survivin threonine 34→alanine mutant (survivin T34A) complexed to a DOTAP-chol liposome (Lip-mS) was administered with or without CDDP in Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) cells and in mice bearing LLC tumors, and the effects on apoptosis, tumor growth and angiogenesis were assessed. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA), and a value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
LLC cells treated with a combination of Lip-mS and CDDP displayed increased apoptosis compared with those treated with Lip-mS or CDDP alone. In mice bearing LLC tumors and treated with intravenous injections of Lip-mS and/or CDDP, combination treatment significantly reduced the mean tumor volume compared with either treatment alone. Moreover, the antitumor effect of Lip-mS combined with CDDP was greater than their anticipated additive effects.
These data suggest that the dominant-negative survivin mutant, survivin T34A, sensitized LLC cells to chemotherapy of CDDP. The synergistic antitumor activity of the combination treatment may in part result from an increase in the apoptosis of tumor cells, inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and induction of a tumor-protective immune response.
There is a great deal of evidence that cisplatin (cis-diammine dichloroplatinum (II); CDDP) induces apoptosis in many tumor cell types. In the clinic, determining the greatest anti-tumoral efficiency using the lowest possible dose is a very difficult problem. Genetic therapy is considered to have enormous potential for resolving this issue.
A novel member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family (IAP), designated survivin , was recently identified by hybridization screening of human genomic libraries with the complementary DNA (cDNA) of a factor Xa receptor, effector cell protease receptor 1. Unlike all other IAPs, survivin is expressed during development and by common human cancers, but is undetectable or detected at extremely low levels in normal adult tissues. Survivin therefore has become an attractive target for novel anticancer interventional agents. In recent years, considerable effort has been expended towards counteracting survivin, including development of antisense oligonucleotides, hammerhead ribozymes, RNA interference[6, 7], cancer vaccines and dominant-negative mutants. Several preclinical studies have already demonstrated that down-regulation of survivin expression or function could inhibit tumor growth, increase spontaneous and induced apoptosis and sensitize tumor cells to anticancer agents.
Phosphorylation of survivin at Thr 34 by the cyclin-dependent kinase cdc2 is believed to promote physical interaction between survivin and caspase-9, resulting in caspase-9 inhibition to reduce apoptosis. It was reported that the survivin mutant Thr34→Ala (survivin T34A) could abolish a phosphorylation site for cdc2-cyclin B1 and prevent survivin binding to activated caspase-9. This reduced tumor cell proliferative potential and led to caspase-dependent apoptosis in melanoma cell lines. It also increased the apoptosis of tumor cells, inhibited tumor angiogenesis and induced a tumor-protective immune response . It was found that greater efficiency was attained in suppression of murine breast cancer by using a plasmid encoding the phosphorylation-defective mouse survivin T34A mutant complexed to DOTAP-chol liposomes (Lip-mS) . As a result, the present study was designed to determine whether Lip-mS could enhance the antitumor activity of CDDP chemotherapy and to explore the possible mechanisms of interaction between survivin targeting-agents and chemotherapy.
Cell lines and culture conditions
The Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) cell line of C57BL/6 mouse origin was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD), cultured in DMEM (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, N.Y.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), and maintained in a humidified incubator at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Plasmid DNA preparation
The recombinant plasmid encoding the phosphorylation-defective mouse survivin threonine 34→alanine mutant (pORF9-msurvivinT34A, mS) and pORF9-mcs (null plasmid) were each purchased from InvivoGen Corporation (San Diego, CA, USA) and confirmed by restriction endonuclease analysis, PCR and DNA sequence analysis. The plasmid was prepared using the Endofree Plasmid Giga kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). Endotoxin levels of the prepared plasmid DNA were determined by Tachypleus Amebocyte Lysate (TAL). No genomic DNA, small DNA fragments, or RNA were detected in the plasmid DNA and the OD260/280 ratios of the DNA were between 1.8 and 2.0. The DNA was dissolved in sterile endotoxin-free water and stored at -20°C until use.
Preparation of DOTAP-chol liposome/plasmid DNA
DOTAP was purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL) and highly purified cholesterol (Chol) was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). DOTAP-chol liposomes were prepared using the procedure described previously. DNA:liposome mixtures were also prepared in accordance with a previously-described method . Briefly, DOTAP-chol (20 mM) and plasmid DNA stock solution diluted in 5% dextrose in water (D5W) were mixed in equal volumes to give a final concentration of 4 mM DOTAP-chol, i.e., 150 μg DNA in 300 μL final volume (ratio, 1:2.6). These reagents were diluted and mixed at room temperature. The DNA solution was added to DOTAP-chol liposomes and rapidly mixed by pipetting up and down twice with the pipette tip. The DNA:liposome mixture thus prepared was precipitate-free and used for all the in vivo experiments. The size of the DNA fragments in the DNA:liposome mixture was determined to be in the range of 300-325 nm.
Flow cytometric analysis
LLC cells were seeded in a 6-well plate and incubated for 24 h, then treated with normal saline (NS), CDDP, Lip-null, Lip-mS, or Lip-mS+CDDP (DNA at 1 μg/mL and CDDP at 4 μg/mL). Forty-eight hours later, the cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in propidium iodide/RNase A solution (0.5 mL), incubated at 37°C for 30 min and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Studies involving whole mice were approved by the Institute's Animal Care and Use Committee. Female C57BL/6 mice of 6 to 8 weeks old were purchased from the experimental animal center of Sichuan University (Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China) and challenged subcutaneously (s.c.) with LLC cells (5 × 105 cells in 50 μL PBS) in the right flank. Mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (8 mice per group) and treated with NS, Lip-mS, CDDP or Lip-mS + CDDP until the tumors had mean diameter of 3 mm. Lip-mS was injected into mice via the tail vein at 5 μg per day once daily for 10 days (days 0 to 9) and CDDP (made in the Qilu Shandong Medical Factory) was injected into mice via the tail vein at 1 mg/kg per week (days 1, 8). Tumor size was determined by caliper measurement of the largest and perpendicular diameters every two days. Tumor volume was calculated according to the formula V = 0.52ab2 (a is the largest superficial diameter and b is the smallest superficial diameter).
Protein extraction and Western blot analysis
Tumor tissue samples were ground into powder under liquid nitrogen by milling in mortar, and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1% nonidet P-40 (NP-40), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3V4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). After being quantifided by Bradford assay, lysates were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel) electrophoresis, electroblotted with Sartoblot onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA) for 1 hr at 100 V, and then membrane blots were blocked at 4°C in 5% non-fat dry milk, washed, and probed with rabbit anti-mouse Caspase 9 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) at 1:1000 and anti-actin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) at 1:100. The blots were labeled with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and visualized by chemiluminescence detection.
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assay
The mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation on day 16 after the initiation of Lip-mS administration. Primary tumors were excised, fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin solution and embedded in paraffin. Contiguous 3-5 μm sections were mounted. In order to highlight the cells that were undergoing apoptosis, unstained sections mounted in silanized slides were subjected to fluorescent in situ TUNEL assay using an in situ apoptotic cell detection kit (Promega, Madison WI, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Representative images were taken under a light microscope (×200) in randomly-selected fields.
CD31 immunohistochemical evaluation
Immunohistochemistal analyses of microvessel formation were performed with goat anti-mouse CD31 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) using the labeled streptavidin-biotin method. Briefly, sections were deparaffinized in xylol and rehydrated in a graded alcohol series. Antigen retrieval was carried out by autoclaving sections in retrieval buffer (10 mM EDTA citrate buffer, pH 6.0) for 3 min in saturated steam after up-pressure gaining (126, 1.6 bars, 23 psi). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation in 3% hydrogen peroxide at room temperature in the dark for 20 min. Non-specific binding of reagents was quenched by incubation of sections for 20 min in 5% normal rabbit serum. Sections were then incubated with goat anti-mouse CD31 (dilution 1/200) antibody overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with biotinylated rabbit antigoat IgG, and then streptavidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase complex at 37°C for 1 h. A negative control was included with each run by substituting the primary antibody with non-immune rabbit serum. Cellular nuclei were counterstained with ameliorative Gill's hematoxylin. Representative images were taken under a light microscope (×400) in randomly-selected fields.
Statistical analysis of the differences in tumor volume, percent apoptosis and microvessel density were performed using one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA). A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Enhancement of the anti-tumor effect of CDDP in vitro
Enhancement of the anti-tumor effects of CDDP in vivo
Survivin has received much greater attention in recent years, thanks not only to its anti-apoptotic effects, but also its relation to chemoresistance. It was reported that survivin acts constitutively in a panel of tumor cells, and approaches designed to inhibit survivin expression or function may lead to tumor sensitization to chemical and physical agents . Hence, the combination of genetic and chemotherapeutic approaches has been a topic of great interest.
CDDP is widely used for the treatment of a variety of human tumors such as lung cancer. CDDP is a well-known DNA damaging agent, and it is currently thought that DNA platination is an essential first step in its cytotoxic activity. However, continuous infusion or multiple administration of CDDP is an excellent regimen for cancer patients because of its adverse effects [16, 17]. Therefore, approaches to improve the sensitivity to drug doses are a subject of intensive study in cancer care. Treatments combining genetic and chemotherapeutic approaches are a relatively new instrument in the fight against cancer.
Our study combining a Lip-mS genetic approach with CDDP significantly increased the anti-tumor effects of single chemotherapy. Moreover, the interactive anti-tumor effect of the combined treatment was greater than the expected additive effect. These data suggest that inhibition of survivin using a dominant-negative mutant, survivin T34A, can sensitize LLC cells to CDDP.
Reduction of apoptosis plays a very important role in tumor initiation, progression, and drug resistance. The major apoptosis-signaling pathways are the mitochondrial pathway and the death-receptor pathway. Several proteins that inhibit apoptosis have been identified, including the members of the bcl-2 family, such as bcl-2 and bcl-xL, and the IAPs. The anti-apoptotic proteins bcl-2 and bcl-xL block the apoptotic event of mitochondrial cytochrome c release into the cytosol, and have been shown to mainly inhibit these two above-mentioned pathways. The gene encoding the IAP survivin has been cloned, and the protein characterized . Survivin is thought to be expressed in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle in a cell cycle-regulated manner, and to be associated with microtubule formation of the mitotic spindle[19, 20].
As a member of the IAP family, survivin can block apoptosis triggered by a variety of apoptotic-stimulating factors. It can directly bind to and inhibit caspase-3 and caspase-7, which act at a common downstream part of the two major apoptotic pathways, and its overexpression in tumors has been implicated in resistance to a variety of apoptotic stimuli, including chemotherapy[17, 20]. For this reason, the survivin antisense gene may facilitate both apoptotic pathways. Although survivin has long been considered a potential target for cancer therapy [18, 19, 21–25], the use of antisense cDNA and oligonucleotides to inhibit its expression has only recently been described [26, 27]. Previous studies have shown that reduction of survivin expression achieved by antisense strategies results in apoptotic cell death and sensitization to anticancer drugs in several tumor cell lines [26, 27]. These results suggest that survivin expression is likely important for cell survival or resistance to chemotherapy in carcinomas.
CDDP acts in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Previous studies have shown that an increase in chemosensitivity is negatively correlated with survivin expression and positively correlated with rates of apoptosis. The results of the study by Kojima et al are consistent with expression of survivin in the G2/M phase. These observations are consistent with an earlier finding  that interaction between survivin and microtubules of the mitotic spindle apparatus is necessary to prevent a default induction of apoptosis at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. And it is reported that cisplatin induced caspase-9 activation and apoptosis in cisplatin-sensitive tumors. Moreover, in a combination therapy experiment with CDDP, evidence was obtained that antisense-mediated downregulation of survivin can sensitize tumor cells to chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo .
The survivin mutant had originally gained attention because it widely and specifically promoted apoptosis and enhanced chemotherapy, and its function and mechanism have been studied in various tumor types [9, 11, 12, 29]. However, there are many aspects of its mechanisms that are still unclear. Our data suggest that the use of survivin T34A deserves further investigation as a useful approach to lung cancer therapy and in chemotherapy with CDDP. It was shown to down-regulate survivin expression and activity, to cause apoptosis in LLC cells, and to inhibit tumor growth. In addition, survivin T34A greatly enhances sensitivity to CDDP. These findings indicate the potential of this combination of a dominant-negative mutant--survivin T34A and administration of CDDP, or other chemotherapy, as a new therapeutic strategy for lung cancer.
This work is in part supported by the National 863 Project of China (2007AA021201).
- Ambrosini G, Adida C, Altieri DC: A novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, expressed in cancer and lymphoma. Nat Med. 1997, 3: 917-921. 10.1038/nm0897-917.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Altieri DC: Xa receptor EPR-1. FASEB J. 1995, 9: 860-865.Google Scholar
- Sarela AI, Verbeke CS, Ramsdale J, Davies CL, Markham AF, Guillou PJ: Expression of survivin, a novel inhibitor of apoptosis and cell cycle regulatory protein, in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2002, 86: 886-892. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanwar JR, Shen WP, Kanwar RK, Berg RW, Krissansen GW: Effects of survivin antagonists on growth of established tumors and B7-1 immunogene therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001, 93: 1541-1552.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pennati M, Colella G, Folini M, Citti L, Daidone MG, Zaffaroni N: Ribozyme-mediated attenuation of survivin expression sensitizes human melanoma cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. J Clin Invest. 2002, 109: 285-286.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paduano F, Villa R, Pennati M, Folini M, Binda M, Daidone MG, Zaffaroni N: Silencing of survivin gene by small interfering RNAs produces supra-additive growth suppression in combination with 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in human prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006, 5: 179-186. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiang G, Li J, Zeng Z, Xian L: Lentivirus-mediated gene therapy by suppressing survivin in BALB/c nude mice bearing oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006, 5: 435-440.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pisarev V, Yu B, Salup R, Sherman S, Gabrilovich DI: Full-length dominant-negative survivin for cancer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 6523-6533.Google Scholar
- Grossman D, Kim PJ, Schechner JS, Altieri DC: Inhibition of melanoma tumor growth in vivo by survivin targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 635-640. 10.1073/pnas.230450097.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Daniel S, O'Connor , Grossman Douglas: Regulation of apoptosis at cell division by p34cdc2 phosphorylation of surviving. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 13103-13107. 10.1073/pnas.240390697.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McKay TR, Bell S, Tenev T, Stoll V, Lopes R, Lemoine NR, McNeish IA: Procaspase 3 expression in ovarian carcinoma cells increases survivin transcription which can be countered with a dominant-negative mutant, survivin T34A, a combination gene therapy strategy. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 3539-3547. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206417.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peng XC, Yang L, Wei YQ, et al: Efficient inhibition of murine breast cancer growth and metastasis by gene transferred mouse survivin Thr34→Ala mutant. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 27: 46-10.1186/1756-9966-27-46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zaffaroni N, Daidone MG: Survivin expression and resistance to anticancer treatments: perspectives for new therapeutic interventions. Drug Resistance Updates. 2002, 5: 65-72. 10.1016/S1368-7646(02)00049-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loehrer PJ, Einhorn LH: Drugs five years later. Cisplatin. Ann Intern Med. 1984, 100: 704-713.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evans DL, Tilby M, Dive C: Differential sensitivity to the induction of apoptosis by cisplatin in proliferating and quiescent immature rat thymocytes is independent of the levels of drug accumulation and DNA adduct formation. Cancer Res. 1994, 54: 1596-1603.Google Scholar
- Morazzoni F, Canevali C, Zucchetti M, Caroli S, Alimonti A, Petrucci F, Giudice G, Masoni E, Bedini AV: cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II) given in continuous infusion with concurrent radiotherapy to patients affected by inoperable lung carcinoma: a pharmacokinetic approach. Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1998, 24: 137-43.Google Scholar
- Kurihara N, Kubota T, Hoshiya Y, et al: Antitumor activity of cisdiamminedichloroplatinum (II) depends on its time × concentration product against human gastric cancer cell lines in vitro. J Surg Oncol. 1995, 60: 238-241. 10.1002/jso.2930600405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ambrosini G, Adida C, Altieri DC: A novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, expressed in cancer and lymphoma. Nat Med. 1997, 3: 917-921. 10.1038/nm0897-917.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li F, Ambrosini G, Chu EY, et al: Control of apoptosis and mitotic spindle checkpoint by survivin. Nature. 1998, 396: 580-583. 10.1038/25141.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tamm I, Wang Y, Sausville E, et al: IAP-family protein survivin inhibits caspase activity and apoptosis induced bf Fas(CD96), Bax, caspase, and anticancer drugs. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 5315-5320.Google Scholar
- Adida C, Crotty PL, McGrath J, Berrebi D, Diebold J, Altieri DC: Developmentally regulated expression of the novel cancer anti-apoptosis gene survivin in human and mouse differentiation. Am J Pathol. 1998, 152: 43-49.Google Scholar
- Jaattela M: Escaping cell death: survival proteins in cancer. Exp Cell Res. 1999, 248: 30-47. 10.1006/excr.1999.4455.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawasaki H, Altieri DC, Lu CD, Toyoda M, Tenjo T, Tanigawa N: Inhibition of apoptosis by survivin predicts shorter survival rates in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 5071-5074.Google Scholar
- LaCasse EC, Baird S, Korneluk RG, Mackenzie AE: The inhibitors of apoptosis IAPs) and their emerging role in cancer. Oncogene. 1998, 17: 3247-3259. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202569.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grossman D, McNiff JM, Li F, Altieri DC: Expression of the apoptosis inhibitor, survivin, in nonmelanoma skin cancer and gene targeting in a keratinocyte cell line. Lab Invest. 1999, 79: 1121-1126.Google Scholar
- Yamamoto T, Manome Y, Nakamura M, Tanigawa N: Down regulation of survivin expression by induction of the effector cell protease receptor-1 reduces tumor growth potential and results in an increased sensitivity to anticancer agents in human colon cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2002, 38: 2316-2324. 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00247-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olie RA, Simones-Wust AP, Baumann B, et al: A novel antisense oligonucleotide targeting survivin expression induces apoptosis and sensitizes lung cancer cells to chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 2805-2809.Google Scholar
- Li F, Ackermann EJ, Bennett CF, et al: Pleiotropic cell-division defects and apoptosis induced by interference with survivin function. Nat Cell Biol. 1999, 1: 461-466. 10.1038/70242.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hiromi K, Minoru I, et al: Enhancement of Cisplatin Sensitivity in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Transfected With a Survivin Antisense Gene. Archoto head neck surg. 2006, 132: 682-685. 10.1001/archotol.132.6.682.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuwahara D: Caspase-9 regulates cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Cancer Letters. 2000, 148: 65-71. 10.1016/S0304-3835(99)00315-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.