Increased expression of CD133 and reduced dystroglycan expression are strong predictors of poor outcome in colon cancer patients
© Coco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 1 August 2012
Accepted: 28 August 2012
Published: 11 September 2012
Expression levels of CD133, a cancer stem cell marker, and of the α-subunit of the dystroglycan (α-DG) complex, have been previously reported to be altered in colorectal cancers.
Expression levels of CD133 and α-DG were assessed by immunohistochemistry in a series of colon cancers and their prognostic significance was evaluated.
Scattered cells positive for CD133 were rarely detected at the bases of the crypts in normal colonic mucosa while in cancer cells the median percentage of positive cells was 5% (range 0–80). A significant correlation was observed with pT parameter and tumor stage but not with tumor grade and N status. Recurrence and death from disease were significantly more frequent in CD133-high expressing tumors and Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant separation between high vs low expressor groups for both disease-free (p = 0.002) and overall (p = 0.008) survival.
Expression of α-DG was reduced in a significant fraction of tumors but low α-DG staining did not correlate with any of the classical clinical-pathological parameters. Recurrence and death from the disease were significantly more frequent in α-DG-low expressing tumors and Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant separation between high vs low expressor tumors for both disease-free (p = 0.02) and overall (p = 0.02) survival. Increased expression of CD133, but not loss of α-DG, confirmed to be an independent prognostic parameters at a multivariate analysis associated with an increased risk of recurrence (RR = 2.4; p = 0.002) and death (RR = 2.3; p = 0.003).
Loss of α-DG and increased CD133 expression are frequent events in human colon cancer and evaluation of CD133 expression could help to identify high-risk colon cancer patients.
KeywordsColon cancer Dystroglycan CD133 Cancer stem cell Prognostic marker Survival analysis
The cancer stem cell (CSC) model of tumorigenesis postulates that only a small number of cancer cells are able to both self renew and give rise to a differentiated progeny. CSC are believed to be responsible for the primary disease as well as its recurrence and metastasis. Thus, it is expected that their evaluation in clinical samples might provide useful information for a better prediction of disease aggressiveness and evolution. Although phenotypic characterisation of colon CSCs is still controversial, CD133 is presently considered a useful marker to identify CSC in colorectal cancers and its detection has been used to evaluate the prognostic significance of CSC in colon cancer patients[1–3].
Dystroglycan (DG) is a non-integrin adhesion molecule expressed in a wide variety of tissues at the interface between the basement membrane and the cell membrane. It is formed by two subunits, the α (extracellular) and β (transmembrane) subunits which bind to the major ECM components and proteins involved in signal transduction and cytoskeleton organization, respectively. DG has been implicated in several cell functions (i.e., growth control, differentiation, shape change and movement) which are all relevant in the process of tumour development and metastasis[4–7]. We and others demonstrated that DG expression, and mainly α-DG, is reduced or lost in a variety of human cancer cell lines and primary tumours and overall, the available findings indicate that loss of DG expression is a frequent event in human malignancies and might play an important role in human tumour development and progression[4–6, 8–10].
In the present study, CD133 and DG expression levels were analyzed by immunostaining in specimens of human primary colon cancers from a large group of patients with a long term follow-up and their relation with traditional prognostic indicators and with the clinical outcome of the patients was evaluated.
Materials and methods
Patient characteristics and tissue samples
Tissue specimens used for immunohistochemical analyses were obtained from a series of consecutive, unselected patients who had undergone curative surgery for colon cancer at the Division of Surgery, Policlinico “Agostino Gemelli”, School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, from June 2000 to December 2003 and for whom clinicopathological data were available. A curative surgery was defined as one in which no macroscopic tumour remained at the end of surgery and in which histopathologic examination of the surgical specimen showed no tumour at the margins of resection. Distant metastases at the time of resection were excluded by preoperative liver ultrasonography and/or CT scan, chest X-ray and intraoperative exploration. After excluding cases with previous personal and/or familiar tumour history and patients with multiple colon cancers and multiple primary cancers or who received preoperative adjuvant therapy or were lost to follow-up, a cohort of 137 patients was selected for this study. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded specimens were retrieved for this study from the archives of the Department of Pathology and two experienced pathologists (GFZ and MM) confirmed the histological diagnosis of each lesion. Histological tumour grading and staging were assessed according to standard criteria. Proximal colon was defined as the large bowel proximal to the splenic flexure, and distal colon was defined as the large bowel distal to the splenic flexure excluding rectum. Treatment remained reasonably consistent during the study period.
Immuno peroxidase detection of CD133 and α-DG
Immunohistochemical analyses were performed on routinely processed, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues employing an avidin–biotin complex immunoperoxidase technique, as previously described[12, 13]. A specific polyclonal anti-CD133 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; 1:100) was used for the staining. Comparable results but with a weaker staining were obtained using the monoclonal AC133 antibody (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany; 1:10) (data not shown). The monoclonal anti α-DG antibody (clone VIA4-1) (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) was used at a concentration of 10 μg/ml in PBS with 1% horse serum.
Controls for specificity of staining were performed by immunostaining duplicate sections in the absence of the primary antibody. Positive and negative control slides were included within each batch of slides.
All scoring and interpretations of the results were made by two of the authors independently (MM and LR) without knowledge of other clinicopathological variables. To assess interobserver variation, the results of the two measurements were compared by paired t test and no statistical differences were found (data not shown). The few cases with discrepant scoring were re-evaluated jointly on a second occasion, and agreement was reached.
The association between molecular and clinic-pathological parameters were calculated using contingency table methods and tested for significance using the Pearson’s chi-square test. Patients were all uniformly followed-up at our Institution and disease free survival (DFS) was defined as the interval between surgery and the first documented evidence of disease in local-regional area and/or distant sites. Overall survival was defined as the interval between surgery and death from the disease. Patients who died for causes unrelated to disease were not included in the survival analyses. All calculations were performed using the STATA statistical software package (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas) and the results were considered statistically significant when the p value was ≤0.05.
Age: 66.8 ±11.3 (mean age ± SD, year)
No. of patients (%)
CD133 expression is increased in colon carcinomas and correlates with the clinical outcome of patients
CD133 expression in relation to clinical and pathological parameters in a series of 137 colon cancers
14 ( 42)
On the other hand, high CD133 staining was detected in 16 (64%) of the 25 stage 1, 12 (28%) of the 43 stage II and in 37 (54%) of the 69 more advanced stage 3 cancers and cross-tab analysis identified a significant correlation (p = 0.006) between the two parameters (Table2). Significance was no longer evident when stage 1/2 cancers (41%) were compared overall with more advanced stage 3 cancers (54%) (p = 0.09) (Table2).
Loss of α-DG expression is a frequent event in colon cancers and correlates with the clinical outcome of patients
α-DG expression in relation to clinical and pathological parameters in a series of 137 colon cancers
When DG staining was analyzed in relation with clinical outcome, low DG expression was more frequent in recurrent vs non-recurrent cases (p = 0.035) but the median percentage of positive cells was not different between the two subgroups of patients. Finally, low DG expression was also more frequent in deceased vs alive patients (p = 0.014) and the median percentage of positive cells tended to be lower in deceased (median = 30.0; range 0–80; mean = 31.1%) compared to surviving patients (median = 40.0; range 0–90; mean = 38.4%) (p = 0.07). When tumours were stratified according with DG expression, mean DFS of DG low expressor tumors was shorter compared to high expressor cases (65.8 vs 84.4 months) and this difference was significant (p = 0.035) as also confirmed by the Kaplan-Meier curves of DFS which displayed a significant separation between the two groups of patients (p = 0.02 by log-rank test) (Figure3C). Similarly, mean OS of DG low expressor tumors was shorter compared to high expressor cases (72.6 vs 91.8 months) and this difference was significant (p = 0.025) as also confirmed by the Kaplan-Meier curves of OS which displayed a significant separation between the two groups of patients (p = 0.01 by log-rank test) (Figure3D).
CD133 immunostaining is an independent prognostic parameter in colon cancer patients
Contribution of various potential prognostic factors to disease free survival by Cox regression analysis in colon cancer patients
Contribution of various potential prognostic factors to overall survival by Cox regression analysis in colon cancer patients
In this study, the expression of the surface markers CD133 and α-DG was evaluated in a subset of colon cancers and their potential prognostic significance was investigated.
We and others previously reported that loss of the α subunit of the DG complex (α-DG) is a frequent event in human cancers[6, 8, 10, 12, 14–16]. We also demonstrated, by western blot analysis, that α-DG is frequently reduced in colon cancer tissues compared to normal adjacent normal tissues while the β subunit did not display significant variations between normal and tumour tissues. In this study, we further analyzed the DG involvement in colon tumorigenesis and confirmed, by immunohistochemistry, that detection of α-DG is frequently reduced or lost in the majority of cancer tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues (Figure2) and that loss of α-DG correlates with a worse prognosis (Figure3). These findings are in agreement with the proposed tumour-suppressor function of the protein and with previous observations in several human malignancies[5, 18–20]. The functional inactivation of the DG complex in tumour cells has been mainly attributed to post-translation mechanisms which cause the loss and/or an altered glycosylation of the extracellular α-DG[21–25]. Since DG subunits are encoded by a single gene and are formed upon cleavage of a precursor protein[6, 26], our previous findings that β-DG subunit is detectable in most of the colon cancers in which α-DG was not detectable suggest that, as reported in other types of human malignancies, this lack of detection is likely not due to loss of gene expression but to a specific posttranscriptional mechanism affecting α-DG processing in colon cancer cells.
The DG complex connects the ECM network to the cytoskeleton and is likely involved in the regulation of signaling pathways. Thus, regardless of the underlying molecular mechanisms, loss of a functional α-DG subunit can play an important role in the tumorigenesis process by compromising the formation of strong contacts between ECM and the cytoskeleton of cells resulting, as for integrins, in less sticky tumour cells able to move unhindered in the extracellular matrix, thus predisposed to invade surrounding tissue and metastasize[6, 17]. It will be of interest to evaluate DG expression in the entire process of human colon tumorigenesis (i.e., from early to metastatic lesions).
CD133 has been reported to be a CSC marker in colorectal cancer[27, 28], and, although some doubts have been arisen about its ability to specifically identify tumour-initiating cells, it has been widely used to identify and analyze CSC in colorectal cancers. We were able to detect CD133 staining in the majority (78%) of colon cancers analyzed although with a high heterogeneity in term of percentage of positive cells (range 0-80%) whose increase was associated with an increased risk of recurrence and death for the disease (Table2 and Figure3). These findings are in agreement with previous evidence suggesting a potential prognostic role of the protein in colon cancer patients. Indeed, it has been reported that CD133 expression levels correlate with patients survival in colorectal cancers[1–3, 30, 31] although available data on the presence of CD133+ cells in human colorectal cancers are not always consistent in term of distribution and percentage of positive cells. Several factors might explain such discrepancies: i) inadequate patient cohort; ii) mixed tumour stages; iii) different criteria used to identify positive staining; iv) different cut-off used to discriminate positive and negative tumours; v) different antibodies used for the analysis, with the latter being, in our opinion, the most important factor. Different antibodies have been indifferently used in different studies for the detection of the CD133 molecule. In our opinion this can be a highly confusing factor. Indeed, we previously demonstrated, by western blot analysis, that CD133 is expressed at various levels in colon cancers[32, 33] and that different results can be obtained by using different antibodies and similar observations have been also reported by other Authors[35, 36]. The observation that high CD133 expression has been reported to be a negative prognostic factor for colorectal cancers in several studies using different antibodies strongly suggests an important prognostic significance of its detection[1, 2, 37]. In our study, CD133 also confirmed to be an independent risk factor for a shorter disease-free and overall survival in a multivariate analysis (Tables 4 and5). These findings are consistent with similar results reported in other human cancers and warrant studies on larger cohorts of patients to further evaluate its suitability as a prognostic marker in the clinical management of colon cancer patients.
We observed an unexpected behaviour of CD133 expression which tended to be higher in the lowest grade/stage tumours than in more advanced lesions. Although not expected, this distribution is consistent with previous findings in a mouse model of colon carcinogenesis and in human primary colon cancers. Indeed, in mouse colon carcinogenesis we observed a significantly increased expression of CD133, assessed by immunohistochemistry, in early neoplastic lesions which tended to decrease with tumour development, although remaining always higher in cancer than in normal adjacent tissues and an increased CD133 expression, assessed using a quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, was reported in Dukes A compared to Dukes B and C colon cancers. These findings are in agreement with the proposed ability of the protein to specifically identify tumour initiating cells, important for the growth of both primary and recurrent/metastatic cancers and thus mainly involved in the most active phases of tumour development, i.e., in early lesions (low grade and low stage cancers) as well as in metastatic lesions. Consistent with this hypothesis, CD133 expression has been reported to be highly expressed in colon cancers with early liver metastases and to be a potential biomarker for the early liver metastases and we also previously reported an increased percentage of CD133+ cells, assessed by flow cytometry, in metastatic vs primary colon cancers,. It will be of interest to evaluate the immunohistochemical CD133 expression in the entire process of human colon tumorigenesis (i.e., from early to metastatic lesions) and evaluate how it correlates with tumour development.
An unexpected finding of the present study was the observed inverse relationship between CD133 and α-DG expression (Table2). The significance of this observation is unknown since no data are available up to date linking the two molecules. It is of interest that DG expression increases with cell differentiation while CD133 expression decreases in differentiated cells[7, 33, 43–45] thus suggesting a potential functional link between the two molecules. Further studies will be required to fully understand the biological significance of the observed relationship between the two molecules.
To our knowledge, this is the first study analyzing the immunohistochemical expression of both CD133 and α-DG, two surface molecules previously reported to be altered in human colorectal cancers, in a large series of colon cancer patients. Our results demonstrate that an inverse relationship exists between the two molecules (Table2) and that CD133 expression is an independent risk factor associated with patient survival in multivariate analyses (Tables 4 and5). The role of CD133 as a biomarker for CSC is still debated. Regardless of its significance as a CSC marker, however, our results suggest that evaluation of CD133 staining might be useful to identify colon cancer patients at high risk of recurrence and death. Thus, we believe, as previously reported, that it will be important to define standardized procedures and reagents to evaluate expression of this molecule in clinical samples. Afterwards, a prospective multicenter evaluation of CD133 immunostaining on a larger population of surgically resected colon cancers is warranted to allow a conclusive and definitive assessment of its suitability in predicting tumor aggressiveness and outcome in colon cancer patients.
This work was supported by grants from Università Cattolica (to A.S.).
- Horst D, Kriegl L, Engel J, Kirchner T, Jung A: CD133 expression is an independent prognostic marker for low survival in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008, 99: 1285-1289. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604664.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kojima M, Ishii G, Atsumi N, Fujii S, Saito N, Ochiai A: Immunohistochemical detection of CD133 expression in colorectal cancer: a clinicopathological study. Cancer Sci. 2008, 99: 1578-1583. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00849.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li C, Li B, Liang Y, Peng R, Ding Y, Xu D, et al: Higher percentage of CD133+ cells is associated with poor prognosis in colon carcinoma patients with stage IIIB. J Transl Med. 2009, 7: 56-10.1186/1479-5876-7-56.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winder SJ: The complexities of dystroglycan. TIBS. 2001, 26: 118-124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muschler J, Levy D, Boudreau R, Henry M, Campbell K, Bissell MJ: A role for dystroglycan in epithelial polarization: loss of function in breast tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 7102-7109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sgambato A, Brancaccio A: The dystroglycan complex: from biology to cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2005, 205: 163-169. 10.1002/jcp.20411.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sgambato A, Di Salvatore M, De Paola B, Rettino A, Faraglia B, Boninsegna A, et al: Analysis of dystroglycan regulation and functions in mouse mammary epithelial cells and implications for mammary tumorigenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2006, 207: 520-529. 10.1002/jcp.20600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calogero A, Pavoni E, Gramaglia T, D'Amati G, Ragona G, Brancaccio A, et al: Altered exression of a-dystroglycan subunit in human gliomas. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006, 5: 441-448. 10.4161/cbt.5.4.2546.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sgambato A, Camerini A, Montanari M, Camerini A, Brancaccio A, Spada D, et al: Increased expression of dystroglycan inhibits the growth and tumorigenicity of human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2004, 3: 849-860.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sgambato A, De Paola B, Migaldi M, Di Salvatore M, Rettino A, Rossi G, et al: Dystroglycan expression is reduced during prostate tumorigenesis and is regulated by androgens in prostate cancer cells. J Cell Physiol. 2007, 213: 528-539. 10.1002/jcp.21130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Compton C, Greene F: The staging of colorectal cancer: 2004 and beyond. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004, 54: 295-308. 10.3322/canjclin.54.6.295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sgambato A, Migaldi M, Montanari M, Camerini A, Brancaccio A, Rossi G, et al: Dystroglycan expression is frequently reduced in human breast and colon cancers and is associated with tumor progression. Am J Pathol. 2003, 162: 849-860. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63881-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zannoni G, Faraglia B, Tarquini E, Camerini A, Vrijens K, Migaldi M, et al: Expression of the CDK inhibitor p27kip1 and oxidative DNA damage in non-neoplastic and neoplastic vulvar epithelial lesions. Mod Pathol. 2006, 19: 504-513. 10.1038/modpathol.3800532.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sgambato A, Tarquini E, Resci F, De Paola B, Faraglia B, Camerini A, et al: Aberrant expression of alpha-dystroglycan in cervical and vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006, 103: 397-404. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.059.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang X, Rieder S, Giese N, Friess H, Michalski C, Kleeff J: Reduced alpha-dystroglycan expression correlates with shortened patient survival in pancreatic cancer. J Surg Res. 2011, 171: 120-126. 10.1016/j.jss.2009.11.730.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shen JG, Xu CY, Li X, Dong M, Jiang ZN, Wang J, et al: Dystroglycan is associated with tumor progression and patient survival in gastric cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2012, 18: 79-84. 10.1007/s12253-011-9419-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bao X, Fukuda M: A tumor suppressor function of laminin-binding alpha-dystroglycan. Methods Enzymol. 2010, 479: 387-396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brennan P, Jing J, Ethunandan M, Gorecki D: Dystroglycan complex in cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004, 30: 589-592. 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.03.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henry MD, Cohen MB, Campbell KP: Reduced expression of dystroglycan in breast and prostate cancer. Hum Pathol. 2001, 32: 791-795. 10.1053/hupa.2001.26468.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cross S, Lippitt J, Mitchell A, Hollingsbury F, Balasubramanian S, Reed M, et al: Expression of beta-dystroglycan is reduced or absent in many human carcinomas. Histopathology. 2008, 53: 561-566. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03157.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Losasso C, Di Tommaso F, Sgambato A, Ardito R, Cittadini A, Giardina B, et al: Anomalous dystroglycan in carcinoma cell lines. FEBS Lett. 2000, 484: 194-198. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02157-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herzog C, Has C, Franzke C-W, Echtermeyer F, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Kroger S, et al: Dystroglycan in skin and cutaneous cells: ß-subunit is shed from the cell surface. J Invest Dermatol. 2004, 122: 1372-1380. 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22605.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jing J, Lien CF, Sharma S, Rice J, Brennan PA, Gorecki DC: Aberrant expression, processing and degradation of dystroglycan in squamous cell carcinomas. European J Cancer. 2004, 40: 2143-2151. 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.05.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Singh J, Itahana Y, Knight-Krajewski S, Kanagawa M, Campbell KP, Bissell MJ, et al: Proteolytic enzymes and altered glycosylation modulate dystroglycan function in carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 6152-6159. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1638.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Bernabé D, Inamori K, Yoshida-Moriguchi T, Weydert C, Harper H, Willer T, et al: Loss of alpha-dystroglycan laminin binding in epithelium-derived cancers is caused by silencing of LARGE. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 11279-11284.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holt KH, Crosbie RH, Venzke DP, Campbell KP: Biosynthesis of dystroglycan: processing of a precursor peptide. FEBS Lett. 2000, 468: 79-83. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01195-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’Brien C, Pollett A, Gallinger S, Dick J: A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice. Nature. 2007, 445: 106-110. 10.1038/nature05372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ricci-Vitiani L, Lombardi D, Signore M, Biffoni M, Pallini R, Parati E, et al: Identification and expansion of human colon-cancer-initiating cells. Nature. 2007, 445: 111-115. 10.1038/nature05384.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shmelkov S, Butler J, Hooper A, Hormigo A, Kushner J, Milde T, et al: CD133 expression is not restricted to stem cells, and both CD133+ and CD133- metastatic colon cancer cells initiate tumors. J Clin Invest. 2008, 118: 2111-2120.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horst D, Kriegl L, Engel J, Kirchner T: A J. Prognostic significance of the cancer stem cell markers CD133, CD44, and CD166 in colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest. 2009, 27: 844-850. 10.1080/07357900902744502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horst D, Scheel S, Liebmann S, Neumann J, Maatz S, Kirchner T, et al: The cancer stem cell marker CD133 has high prognostic impact but unknown functional relevance for the metastasis of human colon cancer. J Pathol. 2009, 219: 427-434. 10.1002/path.2597.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puglisi M, Barba M, Corbi M, Errico M, Giorda E, Saulnier N, et al: Identification of Endothelin-1 and NR4A2 as CD133-regulated genes in colon cancer cells. J Pathol. 2011, 225: 305-314. 10.1002/path.2954.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sgambato A, Puglisi M, Errico F, Rafanelli F, Boninsegna A, Rettino A, et al: Post-translational modulation of CD133 expression during sodium butyrate-induced differentiation of HT29 human colon cancer cells: implications for its detection. J Cell Physiol. 2010, 224: 234-241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sgambato A, Errico F, Caredda E, Puglisi M, Cittadini A: Divergent expression of CD133 in different studies: the need for a consensus panel?. Int J Cancer. 2010, 128: 2247-2249.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hermansen S, Christensen K, Jensen S, Kristensen B: Inconsistent immunohistochemical expression patterns of four different CD133 antibody clones in glioblastoma. J Histochem Cytochem. 2011, 59: 391-407. 10.1369/0022155411400867.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mak A, Blakely K, Williams R, Penttila P, Shukalyuk A, Osman K, et al: CD133 N-glycosylation processing contributes to cell-surface recognition of the primitive cell marker AC133. J Biol Chem. 2011, 31: 4273-4275.Google Scholar
- Xi H, Zhao P: Clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of EphA3 and CD133 expression in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2011, 64: 498-503. 10.1136/jcp.2010.087213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arena V, Caredda V, Cufino V, Stigliano E, Scaldaferri F, Gasbarrini A, et al: Differential CD133 expression pattern during mouse colon tumorigenesis. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31: 4273-4275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hibi K, Sakata M, Sakuraba K, Shirahata A, Goto T, Mizukami H, et al: CD133 gene overexpression is frequently observed in early colo-rectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009, 56: 995-997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keysar S, Jimeno A: More than markers: biological significance of cancer stem cell-defining molecules. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010, 9: 2450-2457. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0530.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Sheng Y, Guan M: Co-expression of stem cell genes CD133 and CD44 in colorectal cancers with early liver metastasis. Surg Oncol. 2012, 21: 103-107. 10.1016/j.suronc.2011.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puglisi M, Sgambato A, Saulnier N, Rafanelli F, Barba M, Boninsegna A, et al: Isolation and characterization of CD133+ population within human primary and metastatic colon cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2009, 13 (Suppl 1): 55-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deng W, Schneider M, Frock R, Castillejo-Lopez C, Gaman E, Baumgartner S, et al: Dystroglycan is required for polarizing the epithelial cells and the oocyte in Drosophila. Development. 2003, 130: 173-184. 10.1242/dev.00199.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feng H, Liu Y, Yang L, Bian X, Yang Z, Gu B, et al: Expression of CD133 correlates with differentiation of human colon cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010, 9: 215-222.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kemper K, Sprick M, de Bree M, Scopelliti A, Vermeulen L, Hoek M, et al: The AC133 epitope, but not the CD133 protein, is lost upon cancer stem cell differentiation. Cancer Res. 2010, 70: 719-729. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1820.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang K, Chen X, Zhang B, Yang C, Chen H, Chen Z, et al: Is CD133 a biomarker for cancer stem cells of colorectal cancer and brain tumors? A meta-analysis. Int J Biol Markers. 2011, 26: 173-180. 10.5301/JBM.2011.8551.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.