Superiority and clinical significance of Lunx mRNA in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion caused by pulmonary carcinoma
© Tang and Xu; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 25 March 2013
Accepted: 25 May 2013
Published: 8 June 2013
Pulmonary carcinoma is the main cause of malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). However, there is no satisfactory marker for diagnosing MPEs caused by pulmonary carcinoma. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical significance of Lunx mRNA detection in diagnosing MPEs caused by pulmonary carcinoma.
A total of 209 patients with pleural effusions were recruited. The patients were diagnosed by cast-off cells, bronchoscopy, and pleural biopsy. The levels of Lunx mRNA in the pleural effusions were determined by real-time PCR. The levels of PH, LDH, glucose, albumin, and CEA were also determined. Patients who accepted chemotherapy underwent Lunx mRNA detection before and after the first chemotherapy session. The patients were divided into four groups according the effect of chemotherapy: complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), no change (NC), and progressive disease (PD). The patients were also divided into two groups according the change in direction of Lunx mRNA expression after chemotherapy: increased group and decreased group. The patients were followed up to determine survival.
Lunx mRNA was positive in 89 of 106 patients with pleural effusions caused by pulmonary carcinoma. The specificity and sensitivity were 95.9% and 84.9%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.922. Lunx mRNA detection was better than detection using cast-off cells and CEA. All of the Lunx-positive patients with MPEs were diagnosed with pulmonary carcinoma, and all extrapulmonary carcinoma patients were Lunx-negative. The positive predictive value of Lunx mRNA for the source of tumor cells was 100%. Lunx mRNA expression decreased after the first session of chemotherapy in the CR and PR groups, increased in the PD group, there was no change in the NC group. Further analysis indicated the change in direction of Lunx mRNA expression was associated with the overall survival of patients. The patients in the increased group had longer overall survival times than those in the decreased group.
Lunx mRNA is a specific tumor gene that is highly expressed in MPEs caused by pulmonary carcinoma. The changes in Lunx mRNA levels after chemotherapy can predict the prognosis of patients with MPEs caused by pulmonary carcinoma.
Pleural effusion is a common disease that is caused by pulmonary carcinomas and other malignant tumors, such as breast cancer and ovarian cancer, and even some nonmalignant diseases including tuberculosis and pneumonia [1, 2]. Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is usually associated with cancer-related mortality and morbidity. Thus, it is important to diagnose MPEs and to treat and evaluate prognosis.
Cytology detection is the conventional method used to distinguish tumor cells in pleural effusions, as described in the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer’s tumor-node metastasis (TNM) classification system . However, cytology detection is imperfect in diagnosing MPEs. Moreover, when pleural effusion cytology cannot establish a patient’s diagnosis, additional invasive procedures must be performed to sample pleura for histological examination to enhance the diagnostic rate . However, there are high risks associated with these procedures, and many hospitals do not have these technologies, which limits their clinical application. Therefore, the diagnosis of MPE presents challenges to clinicians, and it is urgent to search for an effective diagnostic biomarker for this disease.
Lung cancer markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen, and cytokeratin 19 (CK19), have been generally utilized to identify malignant and nonmalignant pleural effusions [4–7]. However, the diagnostic utility of these markers is unsatisfactory. Lung-specific X protein (Lunx), which was isolated by Yoshiyuki and colleagues through differential-display mRNA analysis, is a 206 bp cDNA fragment specifically amplified in the lung . The Lunx gene consists of 1,015 nucleotides, including an open reading frame of 768 nucleotides that encodes 256 amino acids . Lunx has served as a useful molecular marker for the detection of pulmonary carcinoma in bronchial brushing specimens and for the detection of peripheral blood and lymph node metastases [9–12]. Cheng et al.  reported that Lunx mRNA was the most specific biomarker with the highest sensitivity when compared with CK19, CEA, vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C), and heterogeneous ribonuclear protein (hnRNP) for the differential diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer from pleural effusion. However, it is still unclear whether Lunx mRNA expression in pleural effusions can predict the source of tumor cells and the responses of patients to chemotherapy.
Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most sensitive method for the detection of micrometastatic diseases, allowing for the detection of one cancer cell in 106 to 107 mononuclear cells [14, 15], but it is not effective in evaluating therapeutic effect and prognosis. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR can be used to assess gene expression levels and further evaluate the relationship between genes and disease. Currently, very little information is available on the relationship between the expression of Lunx mRNA and MPE.
The main purpose of this study was to evaluate Lunx mRNA expression in lung cancer cells using quantitative real-time RT-PCR, and to assess the diagnostic usefulness of Lunx mRNA expression as a tumor marker in pleural effusion. Furthermore, the correlation of Lunx mRNA expression in pulmonary carcinoma patients with pleural effusion and clinical factors was investigated.
Patients and controls
Clinical characteristics of patients
Patients with pleural effusion
Pulmonary carcinoma (n = 110)
Pneumonia (n = 13)
Tuberculosis (n = 42)
Heart failure/hypoproteinemia(n = 38)
Extrapulmonary carcinoma (n = 6)
Malignant (n = 106)
Nonmalignant (n = 4)
Age ( ± S)
63.35 ± 9.35
61.25 ± 6.29
46.23 ± 11.56
43.38 ± 13.88
64.78 ± 8.53
51.17 ± 9.13
Pleural biopsy (n)
ovarian cancer 1
pleural endotheliomas 1
breast cancer 2
Pleural effusion ( ± S)
7.42 ± 0.05
7.45 ± 0.02
7.18 ± 0.04
7.36 ± 0.04
7.45 ± 0.05
7.48 ± 0.03
665.48 ± 226.18
203.25 ± 57.64
363.46 ± 64.7
384.93 ± 93.44
135.79 ± 32.38
575.5 ± 152.28
4.52 ± 0.81
4.87 ± 0.3
4.78 ± 0.53
4.7 ± 0.58
4.74 ± 0.36
4.46 ± 0.77
46.59 ± 4.84
24.11 ± 1.57
42.47 ± 5.05
47.57 ± 4.59
22.15 ± 2.28
47.93 ± 4.63
Clinical characteristics and therapeutic effects in patients with MPE caused by pulmonary carcinoma
Age ( ± S)
61.16 ± 8.87
63.5 ± 9.85
63.7 ± 6.36
66.92 ± 10.92
Patients with pleural effusions who showed a lump in pulmonary computed tomography (CT) underwent bronchoscope detection. They received topical anesthesia with 5 ml of 2% lidocaine inhaled for 10–15 minutes and 2 ml of 2% lidocaine dropped in each nostril. The bronchoscope was inserted nasally with the patients in the supine position. During the procedure, endobronchial or transbronchial biopsy specimens were collected for histopathology. Their specimens were sent to the department of pathology for pathology detection by a trained specialist.
Detection of cast-off cells from pleural effusions
All patients underwent thoracentesis during hospitalization, and 300–500 ml of pleural effusion was inspired from the indicated patients. Then the effusion was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 8 min to pellet cells. The supernatant of the effusion was removed, and the pellet of pleural effusion cells was resuspended. Each sample was smeared onto 6–8 glass slides, and fixed. Following hematoxylin-eosin staining, the cell types were observed using a microscope. The above steps were also completed by a trained specialist.
Patients who did not undergo bronchoscopy or who had positive endobronchial or transbronchial biopsy results and repeatedly tested negative for cast-off cells in the pleural effusion underwent pleural biopsy. The puncture site was chosen by ultrasound. After routine disinfection and draping, 2% lidocaine was subcutaneously injected for local anesthesia. Then the pleural biopsy needle was inserted into the pleural cavity via a 0.5 cm epidermal incision. When the needle was definitely established in pleural cavity, a hooked, blunt acupuncture needle was inserted into the chest along the needle guard, and 3–4 left, right, and subtus parietal pleura tissues were aspirated. The tissues were fixed with dilute formaldehyde for further pathological examination.
Clinical parameters of pleural effusion
Five milliliters of pleural effusion were inspired from each of the patients. The power of hydrogen (PH) was determined with a blood gas machine (ABL700, Radiometer Medical A/S, Denmark). The levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin (Alb), and glucose (Glu) were determined with a biochemistry analyzer (AU400, Olympus, Japan). The CEA values were determined by the chemiluminescence immunoassay method (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, United States) with the upper limit of 5 ng/ml in normal adult.
Lunx detection via real-time PCR
The pleural effusion sample (15 ml) was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 min to pellet cells. Then the total cellular RNA was extracted using the Trizol reagent according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Lunx detection was performed using a Lunx mRNA fluorescence PCR diagnostic kit (China, Anhui Puyuan Biology Technology Corporation) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using an ABI PRISM 7000 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, United States). The standard RT reaction contained 3.5 μl reverse transcription reaction solution, 5 μl RNA solution, and 1.5 μl water without RNA enzyme in a total volume of 10 μl. The standard PCR contained 5 μl reverse transcription reaction solution, 5 μl RNA solution, and 1.5 μl water without RNA enzyme in a total volume of 25 μl. The initial PCR step was at 50°C for 2 min, followed by a 5 min hold at 95°C. The PCRs were performed using a total of 60 cycles consisting of a 15 s melt at 95°C, followed by a 1 min annealing/extension at 56°C. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate for the target gene and mRNA. Copy numbers less than 103 were considered negative.
SPSS 18.0 software was used to analyze the results of real-time PCR. The K independent samples test was used to compare the gene expression levels in pleural effusion among different groups, to compare pulmonary carcinoma patients in different pathologic groups, and to compare patients before and after clinical treatment. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the specificity and sensitivity among different indexes. In cases where the results of gene expression were negligible, the data were treated as 0 for statistical convenience. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze the overall survival of patients. A value of P < 0.05 (two-tailed test) was considered significant.
General gene expression in each group
Expression of each marker in patients with pleural effusion caused by different diseases
RT-PCR detection of Lunx mRNA was superior to the detection of cast-off cells and CEA in diagnosing MPEs caused by pulmonary carcinoma
The relationship between the levels of Lunx mRNA and the degree of tumor cell differentiation in pulmonary carcinoma
Lunx mRNA expression can predict the source of tumor cells
Lunx mRNA expression is specific to the lungs, but it was unknown whether it could predict the source of tumor cells in MPEs caused by pulmonary carcinoma. We analyzed Lunx mRNA expression in patients with MPEs. There were 112 patients diagnosed with MPE including 106 pulmonary carcinoma and 6 extrapulmonary carcinoma patients. All of the Lunx-positive patients were diagnosed with pulmonary carcinoma, and all of the Lunx-negative patients were diagnosed with extrapulmonary carcinoma (Table 3). The positive predictive value for Lunx was 100%.
Changes in Lunx mRNA expression were associated with the response of patients to chemotherapy
Changes in direction of Lunx mRNA expression were associated with the overall survival of patients
The production of MPE is a pathological process, which results from the failure of pleural defense mechanisms and abnormal mesothelial function, and it is defined by the presence of tumor cells in the pleural effusion . Pulmonary carcinoma is one of the main causes of MPE [19, 20]. Patients with pleural effusion caused by pulmonary carcinoma often have a short median survival . The etiological diagnosis of pleural effusions is important for evaluating the prognosis of patients. However, the current diagnostic tests for MPEs are still unsatisfactory.
Lunx mRNA is expressed in normal lung tissues and pulmonary carcinoma tissues, but not in other normal or tumor tissues , and it has served as a useful molecular marker for the detection of pulmonary carcinoma [11, 13, 22]. However, little information is available on the role of Lunx mRNA expression in the diagnosis of pleural effusions caused by pulmonary carcinoma. In the present study, we found that Lunx mRNA expression was positively detected in 89 of 106 patients with pleural effusions caused by pulmonary carcinoma, and the area under the ROC curve for Lunx mRNA detection was 0.922. The diagnostic utility of Lunx mRNA expression is superior to the use of cast-off cells and CEA. These data provide firm evidence that the detection of Lunx mRNA expression in pleural effusion via RT-PCR is a specific and sensitive method for diagnosing MPEs caused by pulmonary carcinoma, and our results agree with those of Cheng et al. .
Hyperplastic mesothelial cells, rhagiocrine cells, and degenerative mesothelial cells often display special morphological characteristics in the pleural effusion, which makes it difficult to identify the source of the tumor cells . In addition, tumor cells partially lose their characteristics when they unrestrictedly passage in the pleural effusion . Therefore, it is important to find markers to distinguish the source of tumor cells. Lunx mRNA is specifically expressed in the lungs, so we hypothesized that positive Lunx mRNA expression may serve as a tool to identify the source of tumor cells in pleural effusions. In the present study, all Lunx-positive patients with MPEs were diagnosed with pulmonary carcinoma, and all extrapulmonary carcinoma patients were Lunx-negative. From the above results, we conclude that if the Lunx mRNA expression in a patient with MPE is positive, then the source of the tumor cells should be the lungs.
Lunx mRNA is an effective marker of pulmonary carcinoma. In the present study, we analyzed the relationship between Lunx mRNA expression and clinical parameters. We found no association between the levels of Lunx mRNA expression and LDH levels, glucose levels, albumin in the pleural effusion, PH, or histopathological category. However, there were significantly increased levels of Lunx mRNA expression in poorly differentiated tumors compared to moderately and well differentiated tumors. The degree of tumor cell differentiation is recognized as one index to evaluate prognosis. We presume that Lunx mRNA expression levels may be associated with the prognosis of patients with MPE caused by pulmonary carcinoma.
Once diagnosed, chemotherapy is the main method to treat patients with MPE caused by pulmonary carcinoma . In the CR and PR groups, we found that the expression of Lunx mRNA was significantly decreased after the first session of chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the NC group; however, the expression of Lunx mRNA significantly increased in the PD group. These data indicate that the change in Lunx mRNA expression may be associated with the patients’ response to chemotherapy and that Lunx mRNA expression is an effective index for evaluating the effect of chemotherapy. To investigate this idea further, we divided the patients who accepted chemotherapy into two groups according the change in direction of Lunx mRNA expression, and investigated the overall survival of the patients. We found that the patients in the increased Lunx mRNA expression group had longer overall survival times than those in the decreased Lunx mRNA expression group. These data indicated that the change in direction of Lunx mRNA expression after chemotherapy can predict the prognosis of patients.
In conclusion, Lunx mRNA is a specific tumor gene that is highly expressed in MPE caused by pulmonary carcinoma. The detection of Lunx mRNA before and after chemotherapy can help clinicians predict the prognosis of patients. Lunx mRNA is a sensitive marker for distinguishing MPEs caused by pulmonary carcinoma from pleural effusions caused by other reasons. This detection may lead to the early diagnosis of patients with MPE caused by pulmonary carcinoma.
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province, China (No. 20110489).
- Heffner JE, Klein JS: Recent Advances in the diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008, 83: 235-250.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Medford A, Maskell N: Pleural effusion. Postgrad Med J. 2005, 81: 702-710. 10.1136/pgmj.2005.035352.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hermanek P, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH, Wittekind C: Classification of isolated tumor cells and micrometastasis. Cancer. 1999, 86: 2668-2673. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991215)86:12<2668::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-R.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raj GV, Moreno JG, Gomella LG: Utilization of polymerase chain reaction technology in the detection of solid tumors. Cancer. 1998, 82: 1419-1442. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980415)82:8<1419::AID-CNCR1>3.0.CO;2-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Slade MJ, Smith BM, Sinnett HD, Cross NC, Coombes RC: Quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the detection of micrometastases in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17: 1330-Google Scholar
- NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Version 3. 2012, [http://www.NCCN.org] 
- World Health Organization: WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment. 1979, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Offset Publication, No. 48Google Scholar
- Li X, Asmitananda T, Gao L, Gai D, Song Z, Zhang Y, Ren H, Yang T, Chen T, Chen M: Biomarkers in the lung cancer diagnosis: a clinical perspective. Neoplasma. 2012, 59: 500-507. 10.4149/neo_2012_064.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schneider J: Tumor markers in detection of lung cancer. Adv Clin Chem. 2006, 42: 1-41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun SS, Hsieh JF, Tsai SC, Ho YJ, Lee JK, Kao CH: Cytokeratin fragment 19 and squamous cell carcinoma antigen for early prediction of recurrence of squamous cell lung carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 2000, 23: 241-243. 10.1097/00000421-200006000-00006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schneider J, Velcovsky HG, Morr H, Katz N, Neu K, Eigenbrodt E: Comparison of the tumor markers tumor M2-PK, CEA, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and SCC in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2000, 20: 5053-5058.Google Scholar
- Iwao K, Watanabe T, Fujiwara Y, Takami K, Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H, Ozaki K, Monden M, Tanigami A: Isolation of a novel human lung-specific gene, LUNX, a potential molecular marker for detection of micrometastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2001, 91: 433-437. 10.1002/1097-0215(200002)9999:9999<::AID-IJC1059>3.0.CO;2-B.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lv M, Wu MZ, Zhao YJ, Yang DI, Wang EH, Wu GP: Expression and clinical significance of lung-specific X protein mRNA in bronchial brushing specimens from patients with or without lung cancer. Respirology. 2011, 16: 1076-1080. 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02008.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitas M, Hoover L, Silvestri G, Reed C, Green M, Turrisi AT, Sherman C, Mikhitarian K, Cole DJ, Block MI, Gillanders WE: Lunx is a superior molecular marker for detection of non-small cell lung cancer in peripheral blood [corrected]. J Mol Diagn. 2003, 5: 237-242. 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60480-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wallace MB, Block MI, Gillanders W, Ravenel J, Hoffman BJ, Reed CE, Fraig M, Cole D, Mitas M: Accurate molecular detection of non-small cell lung cancer metastases in mediastinal lymph nodes sampled by endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration. Chest. 2005, 127: 430-437. 10.1378/chest.127.2.430.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Zhang Y, Du Z, Wu M, Zhang G: Detection of micrometastases in lung cancer with magnetic nanoparticles and quantum dots. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012, 7: 2315-2324.Google Scholar
- Cheng M, Chen Y, Yu X, Tian Z, Wei H: Diagnostic utility of LunX mRNA in peripheral blood and pleural fluid in patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008, 8: 156-10.1186/1471-2407-8-156.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heffner JE: Management of the patient with a malignant pleural effusion. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2010, 31: 723-733. 10.1055/s-0030-1269831.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Awasthi A, Gupta N, Srinivasan R, Nijhawan R, Rajwanshi A: Cytopathological spectrum of unusual malignant pleuraleffusions at a tertiary care centre in north India. Cytopathology. 2007, 18: 28-32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burrows CM, Mathews WC, Colt HG: Predicting survival in patients with recurrent symptomatic malignant pleural effusions: an assessment of the prognostic values of physiologic, morphologic, and quality of life measures of extent of disease. Chest. 2000, 117: 73-78. 10.1378/chest.117.1.73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jeon CH, Shin KC, Choi EY, Jung SB: Detection of rare cancer cells in the blood by RNA extraction of filtered mononuclear cells and reverse transcription-PCR. J Lab Med Qual Assur. 2011, 33: 111-118.Google Scholar
- Kastelik JA: Management of malignant pleural effusion. Lung. 2013, 191: 165-175. 10.1007/s00408-012-9445-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Politi E, Kandaraki C, Apostolopoulou C, Kyritsi T, Koutselini H: Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing between carcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in body cavity fluids. Diagn Cytopathol. 2005, 32: 151-155. 10.1002/dc.20203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu XQ, Cheng M, Zhang YB, Fang Y, Wang T: The role of LunX and CK19 expression in distinguishing malignant and nonmalignant plural fluids. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc. 2007, 23: 327-328.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.