Open Access

A modified sentinel node and occult lesion localization (SNOLL) technique in non-palpable breast cancer: a pilot study

  • Giulia Anna Follacchio1,
  • Francesco Monteleone1,
  • Paolo Anibaldi2,
  • Giuseppe De Vincentis1,
  • Silvia Iacobelli1,
  • Raffaele Merola3,
  • Valerio D’Orazi3, 4Email author,
  • Massimo Monti3 and
  • Vittorio Pasta3
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201534:113

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-015-0230-x

Received: 7 September 2015

Accepted: 29 September 2015

Published: 6 October 2015

Abstract

Background

The spread of mammographic screening programs has allowed an increasing amount of early breast cancer diagnosis. A modern approach to non-palpable breast lesions requires an accurate intraoperative localization, in order to achieve a complete surgical resection. In addiction, the assessment of lymph node status is mandatory as it represents a major prognostic factor in these patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of a modified technical approach using a single nanocolloidal radiotracer to localize both sentinel node and breast occult lesion.

Methods

Twenty-five patients with a single non-palpable breast lesions and clinically negative axilla were enrolled. In the same day of surgery, patients underwent intratumoral and peritumoral administration of 99mTc-labeled nanocolloid tracer under sonographic guidance. A lymphoscintigraphy was performed to localize the sentinel lymph node and its cutaneous projection was marked on the skin in order to guide the surgeon to an optimal incision. During surgery an hand-held gamma-detection probe was used to select the best surgical access route and to guide localization of both occult breast lesion and sentinel lymph node. After specimen excision, the surgical field was checked with the gamma-probe to verify the absence of residual sources of significant radioactivity, thereby ensuring a radical treatment in a single surgical session and minimizing normal tissue excision.

Results

Both targeted breast lesion and sentinel lymph node were localized and removed at the first attempt in every patients and histopathological diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed in 25/26 samples. Non-palpable lesions were included within the surgical margins in all patients and in all samples surgical margins were free from neoplastic infiltration thus avoiding any further reintervention. Only two patients showed metastatic involvement of sentinel lymph node.

Conclusions

The modified sentinel node and occult lesion localization (SNOLL) technique performed with a single injection of nanocolloidal radiotracer has shown an excellent intraoperative identification rate of both non-palpable lesion and sentinel lymph node. This procedure offers, as opposed to standard techniques, an accurate, simple and reliable approach to the management of non-palpable breast cancer.

Keywords

Non-palpable breast cancersentinel lymph nodeSNOLLradioguided surgeryimaging probe

Background

Over the last decades, the frequency of non-palpable breast tumors has increased due to widespread of mammographic screening programs and the development of more accurate imaging technique [13]. As a result of this trend, it has been reported a decrease in the mean size of neoplastic lesions and a reduction in axillary lymphatic involvement [4, 5]. The constant increase of early, non-palpable breast cancer diagnosis requires a comprehensive approach in order to achieve optimal surgical treatment, as we already highlighted in breast sarcomas [6, 7]. An ideal intraoperative localization procedure of non-palpable breast lesions should enable the surgeon to accomplish a complete excision in a single surgical session while avoiding excessive removal of normal tissue. Since its development, radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) technique has been evaluated as a more reliable procedure to guide the surgical resection of non-palpable breast lesions than hooked wire technique [813]. In patients with early breast cancer and non-palpable lesion the assessment of axillary lymph node status is one of the major prognostic factor [14]. In order to assess axillary lymph node status, sentinel limph node (SLN) biopsy is now a widely accepted procedure for staging patients with early breast cancer, thus avoiding them unnecessary complete axillary dissection [1519]. The possibility to perform ROLL and SLN biopsy in the same surgical session, a procedure known as sentinel node and occult lesion localization (SNOLL) technique, has been evaluated in several studies by using different tracers and sites of injection [2024]. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of a modified SNOLL approach characterized by a single injection of unique nanocolloidal radiotracer for simultaneous occult breast lesion and sentinel lymph node localization.

Materials and methods

Patients

Between November 2012 and October 2014, 25 female patients with a single non-palpable breast lesion, were enrolled for this study, based on preoperative cytologic or histologic evidence. None of the patients had clinical evidence of axillary disease, and all underwent radioguided conservative surgery at the Departments of Radiological Sciences and Surgical Sciences at “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy. The protocol was approved by the institutional review committee, informed consent was obtained from the patients and all procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible institutional committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1983.

Instrumental diagnosis was based on X-ray mammography (X-RM) and breast ultrasound (US); in selected cases a breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed. Images were interpreted in accordance with the breast imaging reporting and data system (BIRADS) lexicon by radiologists experienced in breast imaging. Patients with non-palpable breast lesion classified as BIRADS 4, BIRADS 5, BIRADS 6 were included in the study; preoperative diagnosis of malignancy or suspect malignancy was obtained by Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) or Core Biopsy. Patients with diffuse microcalcifications, multifocal or multicentric lesions, previous breast excisional biopsy or radiotherapy were excluded.

Modified sentinel node and occult lesion localization (SNOLL) technique

The modified SNOLL procedure was performed in a one-day protocol with scheduled surgery. We used a single nanocolloidal tracer (Nanocoll®, Gipharma srl, Saluggia-VC-, Italy, average particle size <80 nm) labeled with 99mTechnetium (99mTc); average radioactivity dose was 35 MBq (range 20–70 MBq) in a volume of 0.4 ml. On the same day of surgery, the nanocolloidal radiotracer was administered by the nuclear physician under US guidance provided by a breast radiologist with 20 years of experience in the field of breast imaging (10.5 MHz linear probe, Aplio XV, Toshiba); through a 22 G needle, half the dose of tracer was injected intratumorally (Fig. 1) in order to mark the clinically occult breast lesion, while the other half was equally divided between the opposite poles of the lesion (peritumoral injection) to identify the lymphatic drainage pathway towards SLN (Fig. 2). The entire procedure was carried out without extracting the needle between the two administrations. After radiotracer injection, all patients were sent to the Nuclear Medicine Unit where lymphoscintigraphy was performed: images were acquired with the patient positioned supine with the arm ipsilateral to the lesion in maximum abduction, using a dual-head gamma camera (Millenium MG, GE Medical Systems, Wisconsin, USA) with low-energy, high-resolution parallel-hole collimators. Early dynamic acquisitions were obtained in oblique anterior (OA) projection for 20 minutes (64×64 matrix, 1 image/minute), then static images were performed in OA and lateral position with an acquisition time of 300 seconds in a 128×128 matrix. After the visualization of the lymphatic drainage pathway and SLN, its cutaneous projection was identified thanks to 57Co scintigraphic tracer and marked on the skin with permanent ink to provide a guide for an optimal surgical incision.
Fig. 1

US-guided intralesional injection of nanocolloidal radiotracer

Fig. 2

US-guided perilesional injection of nanocolloidal radiotracer

Surgery

Each patient underwent conservative surgery on the same day of radiotracer injection. A hand-held gamma-detection probe (GDP - Node Seeker™ 800, IntraMedical Imaging, CA, USA) set to 99mTc photo-emittance peak (140 keV ± 20 %) was used by the surgeon on intact skin to select the best surgical access route, then the same probe was introduced in the incision at different angles to detect the area of maximal radioactivity in the surgical field and to define margins of resection (Fig. 3). After radio-guided excision, breast tissue specimen was oriented on three points and double-checked with GDP once moved away from the surgical field, then γ-probe was used to verify the absence of residual areas of significant radioactivity in resection field; the surgeon applied the same research technique to identify and remove SLN (Fig. 4). If the breast lesion was in the upper outer quadrant, the incision used to remove the lesion was the same to access also the SLN, thus achieving a better cosmetic outcome; if the lesion was in another quadrant, a separate axillary incision was performed to remove SLN.
Fig. 3

Intraoperative radio-guided excision of occult breast lesion

Fig. 4

Intraoperative radio-guided localization and excision of sentinel node

Pathological examination

Histological examination of the surgical specimen was carried out by a pathologist specialized in breast diseases. Breast tissue specimens were examined macroscopically to determine dimensions of the excised tissue, presence and size of the lesion and microscopically to assess the nature of the lesion, resection margins’ size and their eventual neoplastic infiltration. SLN was analyzed in serial sections with haematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry with anti-cytokeratine antibodies (clone MNF116) to assess the presence of macrometastases, micrometastases or isolated tumor cells.

Results

Initially, fourty patients with a clinically occult breast lesion detected by X-RM or US imaging and charachterized by FNAC or Core Biopsy were consecutively evaluated; all patients had no clinical evidence of axillary disease. According to trial exclusion criteria, 6 patients were excluded because of diffuse microcalcifications at X-RM, 3 patients were excluded because multifocal or multicentric lesions were detected during MRI evaluation, 2 patients were excluded for previous excisional biopsy on the same breast, 1 patient was excluded for previous breast radiotherapic treatment and 3 patients were excluded because non-malignant lesion was diagnosed by FNAC or Core Biopsy, for a total of 15 patients excluded. The remaining 25 patients with imaging report (X-RM, US and MRI) of single non-palpable breast lesion and clinically negative axilla were enrolled for the study. One patient showed a clinically occult breast lesion in both breasts so that she underwent bilateral SNOLL procedure. As a result, we targeted a total of 26 clinically occult breast lesions. Mean age of patients was 60 years (range 43–81 years); 5 patients (20 %) were in menopause and 20 patients (80 %) were postmenopausal. Preoperative lesion characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Preoperative lesion’s characteristics

  

No. of lesions

%

 

Age

  

Mean

60

  

Range

43-81

  

Breast quadrant

   

 Upper outer

 

17

65 %

 Inferior inner

 

2

7 %

 Upper inner

 

6

24 %

 Inferior outer

 

1

4 %

Radiological diagnosis

   

 BI-RADS 4

 

13

50 %

 BI-RADS 5

 

11

42 %

 BI-RADS 6

 

2

8 %

Cytological (C) or histological (B) diagnosis

   

 C3

 

4

15 %

 C4

 

6

23 %

 C5

 

8

31 %

 B4

 

2

8 %

 B5

 

6

23 %

After intratumoral radiotracer injection, clinically occult breast lesion was successfully identified by using the γ-detection probe and removed at the first surgical session in every patient. The evaluation of surgical field by using γ-probe demonstrated the absence of residual areas of significant radioactivity in resection field in all cases. Histological examination of the surgical specimens confirmed malignancy in 25 patients (96 %); in one patient there was evidence of non-malignant lesion (this patient had a breast lesion classified as BIRADS 4 at imaging and C3 at FNAC). Every breast lesion (mean size 8 mm, range 4–18 mm) was included within the surgical margins, which were free from neoplastic infiltration, thus avoiding any further re-intervention. The closest resection margin was 1 mm in 3 patients. Complete results of the final histological examination are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Final histopathological findings

  

No. of Patients

%

Dimensions

   

 Mean

8 mm

  

 Range

4-18 mm

  

Histological diagnosis

   

 Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)

 

6

23

 IDC + ductal carcinoma (DC) in situ

 

11

42

 DC in situ

 

4

15

 Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC)

 

2

7

 Tubular Carcinoma

 

1

4

 Tubular Carcinoma +

 

1

4

 DC in situ

   

 No evidence of malignancy

 

1

4

Grading

   

 G1

 

9

36

 G2

 

10

40

 G3

 

6

24

Resection margins (mm)

   

 1

 

3

12

 2

 

5

20

 3

 

0

0

 4

 

3

12

 5

 

6

24

 6

 

2

8

 7

 

1

4

 8

 

1

4

 9

 

0

0

 >10

 

4

16

Lymphoscintigraphy showed axillary drainage pattern in all patients; a single SLN was identified in 24 patients, while in two patients were localized two SLN. Lymphoscintigraphic findings were always confirmed during surgery by using γ-probe and SLN was found and removed in every patient.

A total of 35 lymph nodes were isolated at final histopathological examination (average excised lymph nodes per patient 1,4); 32/35 lymph nodes were free from metastatic involvement, two SLN showed macrometastases (>2 mm) so patients were addressed to complete axillary dissection, while in one patient SLN showed isolated tumor cells (Table 3) whose malignant potential and prognostic significance are still under debate [2527]. Post-operative TNM classification is shown in Table 4. The entire modified SNOLL procedure was well tolerated by all patients and no complications were observed.
Table 3

Status of removed lymph-nodes (LNs)

 

No. of LNs

%

Free from metastatic involvement

32

91

Isolated Tumor Cells

1

3

Micrometastases

0

0

Macrometastases

2

6

Table 4

Postoperative pTNM classification

 

No. of patients

%

pT

  

 pTis

2

8.33

 pT1a

3

12.5

 pT1b

15

62.5

 pT1c

3

12.5

 pT2a

1

4.16

pN(sn)

  

 pN0

21

87.5

 pN0 (i+)(sn)

1

4.16

 pN1 mi(sn)

0

0

 pN1a

2

8.33

Discussion

Clinical presentation of breast cancer is changing thanks to mammographic screening programs and greater awareness among women. The increasing frequency of non-palpable breast lesions, characterized by low risk of metastatic lymph nodes at diagnosis [28], requires an approach aimed at both accurate intraoperative localization of occult neoplastic lesions and reliable SLN identification. As a matter of fact, several imaging techniques are used to detect metastasis from different types of cancers [29]. Gamma detection probe is more frequently indicated for two surgical procedures: SLN sampling (for breast cancer and melanomas) and minimally-invasive radioguided surgery of parathyroid adenomas [30, 31].

In this study, the modified SNOLL technique characterized by simultaneous intra- and peri-tumoral US-guided injection of nanocolloidal tracer has shown an excellent localization rate of both occult breast lesion and SLN.

The choice of a single-day protocol characterized by radiotracer injection and lymphoscintigraphy performed on the morning of surgery, when compared with approaches previously described such as the one proposed by Feggi et al. [20], allowed to improve time management and to reduce radioactive exposure to patients.

In addition, radiotracer administration under US guidance was easy to perform and provided a real-time control of needle position, permitting an accurate injection of the tracer. Nanocolloidal radiotracer injected intratumorally remains in the inoculation site for the necessary time to enable the surgeon to select the optimal surgical access route to the lesion and to perform an efficient tumor localization and excision through the constant orientation provided by γ-probe. Furthermore, after each radio-guided excision the surgeon was able to perform a check on the surgical field to confirm the absence of neoplastic tissue residual immediately. This approach allowed a limited breast conserving treatment and ensured disease-free resection margins in a single surgical session. In our series, as demonstrated by histopathological analyses of the surgical specimens, the modified SNOLL procedure permitted a complete excision of the lesion at the first attempt in every patient, with no need of re-intervention for involved resection margins. Limited breast tissue excision allowed a better cosmetic outcome for patients improving patient compliance and potentially reducing subsequent plastic surgery. SLN identification obtained with bipolar perilesional tracer injection, allowed an accurate study of lymphatic drainage pathway and a selective surgical removal of the SLN identified with γ-probe, avoiding unnecessary complete axillary dissection and its surgical complications, such as chronic arm lymphedema and paraesthesias [3235]. In our series, 88.9 % of patients had no metastasis at the frozen section histological examination of the SLN and only in two patients complete axillary dissection was required because of SLN macrometastasis detection.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this pilot study shows that, as opposed to standard techniques (i.e., radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy performed on the day prior surgery and radio-guided occult lesion localization performed on the day of surgery), the modified SNOLL technique is an accurate and easy-to-perform procedure. Indeed, it allows, following intra- and peri-tumoral injection of a single nanocolloidal radiotracer under US guidance, both tumor excision and SLN removal in a single surgical session reducing re-intervention rate and unnecessary complete axillary dissection. It is worth to remember that the procedure doesn’t require any particular radioprotection measure due to the extremely low-dose exposition of the operating staff, as assessed by Cremonesi [36]. This procedure improves resource and time management of early, non-palpable breast cancers increasing comfort for patients.

Abbreviations

SNOLL: 

sentinel node and occult lesion localization

ROLL: 

radioguided occult lesion localization

SLN: 

sentinel limph node

X-RM: 

X-ray mammography

US: 

ultrasound

MRI: 

magnetic resonance imaging

BI-RADS: 

breast imaging reporting and data system

FNAC: 

fine needle aspiration cytology

nm: 

nanometer

99mTc: 

technetium-99 m

MBq: 

megabecquerel

MHz: 

megahertz

G: 

gauge

OA: 

oblique anterior

57Co: 

Cobalt-57

GDP: 

gamma-detection probe

keV: 

Kiloelectron-volts

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patients who participated in this study. No financial support was received for this study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Nuclear Medicine Unit, “Sapienza” University of Rome
(2)
Breast Unit, Department of General Surgery, “San Camillo de Lellis” Hospital
(3)
Department of Surgical Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome
(4)
Department of General Microsurgery and Hand Surgery, “Fabia Mater” Hospital

References

  1. Kohler BA, Sherman RL, Howlader N, Jemal A, Ryerson AB, Henry KA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2011, featuring incidence of breast cancer subtypes by race/ethnicity, poverty and state. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hortobagyi GN, de la Garza SJ, Pritchard K, Amadori D, Haidinger R, Hudis CA, et al. The global breast cancer burden: variations in epidemiology and survival. Clin Breast Cancer. 2005;6:391–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. De Felice C, Cipolla V, Stagnitti A, Marini A, Pasqualitto E, Meggiorini ML. The impact of presurgical magnetic resonance in early breast cancer: an observational study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33:193–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cady B, Stone MD, Schuler JG, Thakur R, Wanner MA, Lavin PT. The new era in breast cancer: invasion, size, and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening. Arch Surg. 1996;131:301–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Eng J Med. 2005;353:1784–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Pasta V, Sottile D, Urciuoli P, Del Vecchio L, Custureri F, D'Orazi V. Rare chondrosarcoma of the breast treated with quadrantectomy instead of mastectomy: A case report. Oncol Lett. 2015;9:1116–20.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pasta V, Monti M, Cialini M, Vergine M, Urciuoli P, Iacovelli A, et al. Primitive sarcoma of the breast: new insight on the proper surgical management. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:72.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Paganelli G. Radioguided surgery of occult breast lesions. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:205–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Sajid MS, Parampalli U, Haider Z, Bonomi R. Comparison of radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and wire localization for non-palpable breast cancers: a meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:852–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Vora R, Goldsmith CH, Kahnamoui K. Systematic review of radioguided surgery for non-palpable breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:388–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Medina-Franco H, Abarca-Pérez L, García-Alvarez MN, Ulloa-Gómez JL, Romero-Trejo C, Sepúlveda-Méndez J. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) versus wire-guided lumpectomy for non-palpable breast lesions: a randomized prospective evaluation. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:108–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lombardi A, Nigri G, Scopinaro F, Maggi S, Mattei M, Bonifacino A, et al. High-resolution, handheld camera use for occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): A single-institution experience with 186 patients. Surgeon. 2015;13:69–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Moreno M, Wiltgen JE, Bodanese B, Schmitt RL, Gutfilen B, da Fonseca LM B. Radioguided breast surgery for occult lesion localization: correlation between two methods. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2008;27:29.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer. 1989;63:181–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg VS, Shriver C, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer–a multicenter validation study. N Eng J Med. 1998;339:941–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Eng J Med. 2003;349:546–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:881–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Zavagno G, De Salvo GL, Scalco G, Bozza F, Barutta L, Del Bianco P, et al. A randomized clinical trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer results of the sentinella/GIVOM Trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247:207–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Veronesi U, Viale G, Paganelli G, Zurrida S, Luini A, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: ten-year results of a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg. 2010;251:595–600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Feggi L, Basaglia E, Corcione S, Querzoli P, Soliani G, Ascanelli S, et al. An original approach in the diagnosis of early breast cancer: use of the same radiopharmaceutical for both non-palpable lesions and sentinel node localisation. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1589–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanis PJ, Deurloo EE, Valdés Olmos RA, Rutgers EJ, Nieweg OE, Besnard AP, et al. Single intralesional tracer dose for radio-guided excision of clinically occult breast cancer and sentinel node. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:850–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. De Cicco C, Trifirò G, Intra M, Marotta G, Ciprian A, Frasson A, et al. Optimised nuclear medicine method for tumor marking and sentinel node detection in occult primary breast lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:349–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Monti S, Galimberti V, Trifiro G, De Cicco C, Peradze N, Brenelli F, et al. Occult Breast Lesion Localization plus Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNOLL): Experience with 959 Patients at the European Institute of Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2928–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lavoué V, Nos C, Clough KB, Baghaie F, Zerbib E, Poulet B, et al. Simplified Technique of Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) Plus Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SNOLL) in Breast Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2556–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. D'Angelo-Donovan DD, Dickson-Witmer D, Petrelli NJ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a history and current clinical recommendations. Surg Oncol. 2012;21:196–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Reed J, Rosman M, Verbanac KM, Mannie A, Cheng Z, Tafra L. Prognostic implications of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in sentinel nodes of patients with invasive breast cancer: 10-year analysis of patients enrolled in the prospective East Carolina University/Anne Arundel Medical Center Sentinel Node Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:333–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Shriver CD, Hueman MT, Ellsworth RE. Molecular signatures of lymph node status by intrinsic subtype: gene expression analysis of primary breast tumors from patients with and without metastatic lymph nodes. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33:116.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Giuliano AE, Barth AM, Spivack B, Beitsch PD, Evans SW. Incidence and predictors of axillary metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the breast. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:185–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Solivetti FM, Desiderio F, Guerrisi A, Bonadies A, Maini CL, Di Filippo S, et al. HF ultrasound vs PET-CT and telethermography in the diagnosis of In-transit metastases from melanoma: a prospective study and review of the literature. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33:96.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pasta V, Monteleone F, Del Vecchio L, Iacobelli S, Urciuoli P, D’Orazi V. Original technique for preoperative preparation of patients and intraoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas. G Chir. 2015;36:97–100.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Povoski SP, Neff RL, Mojzisik CM, O'Malley DM, Hinkle GH, Hall NC, et al. A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology. World J Surg Oncol. 2009;27:11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Del Bianco P, Zavagno G, Burelli P, Scalco G, Barutta L, Carraro P, et al. Morbidity comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus conventional axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients: results of the sentinella-GIVOM Italian randomised clinical trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:508–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pasta V, Urciuoli P, D'Orazi V, Sottile D, Monti M, Redler A. Contralateral axillary metastases from breast cancer. Personal experience and review of literature. Ann Ital Chir. 2014;85:260–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pasta V, Monteleone F, D'Orazi V, Del Vecchio L, Sottile D, Iacobelli S, et al. Typical and atypical lymphatic flows in breast carcinoma. Ann It Chir. 2015;19:86.Google Scholar
  35. Pasta V, D'Orazi V, Sottile D, Del Vecchio L, Panunzi A, Urciuoli P. Breast Mondor's disease: Diagnosis and management of six new cases of this underestimated pathology. Phlebology. 2015;30:564–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Cremonesi M, Ferrari M, Sacco E, Rossi A, De Cicco C, Leonardi L, et al. Radiation protection in radioguided surgery of breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 1999;20:919–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Follacchio et al. 2015

Advertisement