Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Review
  • Open Access

STAT3 as a potential therapeutic target in triple negative breast cancer: a systematic review

Contributed equally
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201938:195

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1206-z

  • Received: 6 April 2019
  • Accepted: 2 May 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is typically lack of expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), represents the most aggressive and mortal subtype of breast cancer. Currently, only a few treatment options are available for TNBC due to the absence of molecular targets, which underscores the need for developing novel therapeutic and preventive approaches for this disease. Recent evidence from clinical trials and preclinical studies has demonstrated a pivotal role of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in the initiation, progression, metastasis, and immune evasion of TNBC. STAT3 is overexpressed and constitutively activated in TNBC cells and contributes to cell survival, proliferation, cell cycle progression, anti-apoptosis, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, chemoresistance, immunosuppression, and stem cells self-renewal and differentiation by regulating the expression of its downstream target genes. STAT3 small molecule inhibitors have been developed and shown excellent anticancer activities in in vitro and in vivo models of TNBC. This review discusses the recent advances in the understanding of STAT3, with a focus on STAT3’s oncogenic role in TNBC. The current targeting strategies and representative small molecule inhibitors of STAT3 are highlighted. We also propose potential strategies that can be further examined for developing more specific and effective inhibitors for TNBC prevention and therapy.

Keywords

  • STAT3
  • Triple negative breast cancer
  • Oncogene
  • Immune escape
  • Small molecule inhibitors

Background

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive form of breast cancer and accounts for much higher recurrence and metastasis rates [1]. Due to the absence of the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), TNBC is unresponsive to endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies, which results in the high mortality of patients with this disease [1]. When patients are diagnosed with TNBC at the early stage, combination chemotherapy (anthracyclines, taxanes, platinum salts, etc.) with or without radiotherapy is used as standard non-surgical therapy and has shown some efficacy in patients with both primary and metastatic diseases [2]. Because of the inter- and the intratumoral heterogeneities of TNBC, the intrinsic chemoresistance as well as severe side effects are often observed and lead to limited success in the clinic [3, 4]. Targeted therapies (e.g., poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors) and immunotherapies have also shown some promise in preliminary clinical studies, but further investigations are critically needed [57]. More recently, many efforts have been made to identify targetable molecules for treating TNBC via genomic profiling and several critical alternations have been discovered, including the overexpression and aberrant activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) [8, 9]. The emerging data suggest that STAT3 may be a potential molecular target and biomarker for TNBC.

The STAT family of transcription factors is comprised of seven members with high structural and functional similarity, including STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT5b, and STAT6 [10, 11]. All STAT proteins consist of an amino acid domain (NH2), a coiled-coil domain (CCD) for binding with interactive proteins, a DNA binding domain (DBD), a linker domain, a SRC homology 2 (SH2) domain for phosphorylation and dimerization, and a C-terminal transactivation domain (TAD) [11]. Most of these domains are highly conserved among STAT proteins and only TAD is divergent and mainly contributes to their structure diversity [12]. STAT3 was initially discovered to bind to DNA in response to interleukin-6 (IL-6) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) in 1994 [13, 14]. Over the past decades, STAT3 has become one of the most investigated oncogenic transcription factors and is highly associated with cancer initiation, progression, metastasis, chemoresistance, and immune evasion [15, 16]. The recent evidence from both preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that STAT3 plays a critical role in TNBC and STAT3 inhibitors have shown efficacy in inhibiting TNBC tumor growth and metastasis.

Considering that there is an unmet medical need for TNBC treatment and innovative therapeutic agents are urgently required, an in-depth understanding of the roles of STAT3 in TNBC will facilitate the development of STAT3-targeted therapeutics and pave the way for a novel TNBC treatment approach. In this review, we focus on the recent findings related to STAT3’s role in TNBC as well as STAT3 inhibitors and current targeting strategies. We also discuss other potential strategies for developing new STAT3 inhibitors for TNBC treatment.

The STAT3 signaling pathway

The classical STAT3 signaling pathway that is activated through the binding of cytokines or growth factors to their corresponding cell surface receptors has been extensively reviewed [1618]. Here, we present a brief overview of the STAT3 signaling pathway, nonreceptor tyrosine kinases of STAT3, and its intrinsic inhibitors and coactivators, which are depicted in Fig. 1. Briefly, the overexpressed cytokine receptors, e.g., interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) and interleukin-10 receptor (IL-10R) and the hyperactive growth factor receptors, e.g., epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR) always trigger the tyrosine phosphorylation cascade through the binding of ligands to these receptors, leading to the aberrant activation of STAT3 and the transcription of its downstream target genes [17]. Once the ligands bind to their receptors on the cell surface, these receptors further form dimers and successively recruit glycoprotein 130 (gp130) and Janus kinases (JAKs), thus phosphorylating and activating JAKs [19]. Conversely, the cytoplasmic tyrosine residues of these receptors are phosphorylated by the activated JAKs and then interact with the SH2 domain of STAT3, resulting in STAT3 phosphorylation at Tyr705 by JAKs [16]. In addition, STAT3 can be phosphorylated and activated by several nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, e.g., Src and Abl [20]. The phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) further forms a homodimer through interaction between their phosphorylated Tyr705 site and SH2 domain, triggering the dissociation of STAT3 dimers from the cell surface receptors and its translocation from cytoplasm to the nucleus [21, 22]. With the help of a variety of coactivator proteins, including NCOA/SRC1a, apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease-1/redox factor-1 (APE/Ref-1), and CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300, the nuclear STAT3 binds to specific DNA sequences and activates the transcription of genes that regulate various phenotypes of cancer cells [17, 18].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The STAT3 signaling pathway in cancer cells. Under normal physiological conditions, STAT3 activation is strictly controlled by the endogenous inhibitors, including the protein inhibitor of activated STAT (PIAS), the suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS), and several protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs). Once the upstream cytokines (e.g., IL-6) or growth factors (e.g., EGF, FGF, and VEGF) bind to cell surface receptors, STAT3 is phosphorylated and activated by JAK or Src. The nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (e.g., Src and Abl) also phosphorylate STAT3. The phosphorylated STAT3 undergoes dimerization and translocates from cytoplasm into the nucleus. The activated STAT3 further binds to DNA and its coactivators (e.g., NCOA, APE, and CBP) and induces the transcription of its downstream target genes

STAT3 is also highly expressed in some normal tissues and organs, including the bone marrow, peripheral nervous system, and digestive tract and plays a physiological role [2325]. In the normal physiological conditions, STAT3 phosphorylation and activation are tightly controlled by several intrinsic inhibitors, including protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), the suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS), and the protein inhibitor of activated STAT (PIAS) [26]. The Src homology domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases 1/2 (SHP-1/2) directly interact and dephosphorylate JAK and STAT3, resulting in their inactivation [27, 28]. The nuclear PTPs, including TC45 and T-cell protein-tyrosine phosphatase (TC-PTP) induce the inactivation of STAT3 through its dephosphorylation and translocation from nucleus to the cytoplasm [29, 30]. Other PTPs, such as PTP1B and PTPeC have also been reported to regulate STAT3 dephosphorylation and inactivation [31]. Moreover, SOCS directly interacts with JAK and STAT3 and inhibits their phosphorylation and activation via forming a negative feedback loop with JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway [32]. PIAS inhibits the binding of nuclear STAT3 to DNA and induces STAT3 dephosphorylation via protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor T (PTPRT), leading to the reduced expression of its downstream target genes [33]. In addition, the stability of STAT3 protein is also regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system via the ubiquitin ligase TRAF6 (tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6) [34]. Recent studies have also reported that miR-544 directly targets the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) on STAT3 mRNA, thus down-regulating STAT3 expression in TNBC cells [35]. Due to the presence of these endogenous inhibitors, STAT3 is strictly governed to exert its physiological functions in normal cells [36]. Herein, both direct inhibition of STAT3 and activation of the endogenous inhibitors may be considered as potential STAT3-inhibiting strategies for developing novel cancer therapeutics.

The STAT3 signaling pathway in triple negative breast cancer

The oncogenic potential of STAT3 has been widely recognized through its involvement in regulating the expression of genes related to cancer cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, chemoresistance, immune suppression, stem cell self-renewal and maintenance, and autophagy (as shown in Fig. 2) [17, 18]. Importantly, STAT3 is overexpressed and constitutively activated in TNBC, which is highly related to TNBC initiation, progression, metastasis, resistance to chemotherapy, and the poor survival outcomes [8]. STAT3 is not only capable of eliciting the expression of cancer-related genes, but also physically interacts and functionally cooperates with other oncogenic transcription factors, e.g., GLI1, promoting the aggressiveness of TNBC [8]. A recent study has also found a reduction of the gene associated with retinoic-interferon-induced mortality 19 (GRIM-19), an intrinsic inhibitor of STAT3 transcription accompanied by STAT3 overexpression in TNBC [37]. In addition, TCPTP, including two splice variants TC45 and TC48 are down-regulated in TNBC cells in vitro and in vivo, which also contributes to the activation of STAT3 signaling [38]. Indeed, STAT3 has also been found to localize in the mitochondria, where it is termed mitoSTAT3 and regulates the mitochondrial functions, including electron transport chain, ATP synthesis, calcium homeostasis, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation [39, 40]. Moreover, mitoSTAT3 has been shown to promote breast cancer cell growth, in which the phosphorylation of Serine 727 plays a critical role [41].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Activation of STAT3 signaling promotes growth, metastasis, chemoresistance, immune escape, and stemness in TNBC. One the upstream regulators are activated, STAT3 is phosphorylated, dimerized, and translocated into the nucleus, where it activates the transcription of the target genes that regulate cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, chemoresistance, immune escape, stem cell phenotypes, and autophagy

A recent study has shown that acetylated STAT3 is highly elevated in TNBC, causing the methylation and inactivation of tumor-suppressor gene promoters [42]. Importantly, mutation of STAT3 at Lys685 or reducing STAT3 acetylation by resveratrol could induce demethylation and activation of the estrogen receptor-α gene and sensitize TNBC cells to antiestrogens. Considering the emerging data that demonstrate the critical role of STAT3 in TNBC, we herein present a comprehensive overview of its oncogenic functions in this section.

Role of STAT3 in TNBC cell proliferation and anti-apoptosis

Several studies have demonstrated that STAT3 promotes cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis in TNBC by increasing the expression of target genes, including survivin, c-Myc, cyclin D1, B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), and B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-xL) [21]. In TNBC, STAT3 directly binds to the survivin promoter and promotes its transcription [43, 44], which can be blocked by inhibiting the nuclear export factor, exportin 1 (XPO1) and CBP-mediated STAT3 acetylation [45]. In addition, Galectin-1, a β-galactoside binding protein has also been shown to contribute to TNBC progression through binding to integrin β1 and activating the integrin β1/FAK/c-Src/ERK/STAT3/survivin pathway [46]. Conversely, WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (Wwox) inhibits TNBC cell proliferation by interacting with JAK2 and suppressing JAK2 and STAT3 phosphorylation [47]. Wwox also represses the binding of STAT3 to the IL-6 promoter, therefore decreasing the expression of IL-6 cytokine. A tumor suppressor gene, gametogenetin-binding protein 2 (GGNBP2) has been found to inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation and induce apoptosis, independent of ER expression [48]. A further study has indicated that the inhibition of IL-6/STAT3 signaling by GGNBP2 is mainly responsible for its inhibitory effects on TNBC growth and metastasis [48].

STAT3 also promotes TNBC cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis through the crosstalk with SET and MYND domain 2 (SMYD2) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) [49]. SMYD2 is highly expressed in TNBC cell lines and tissues, which is correlated with increased TNBC cell proliferation and survival. Mechanistically, SMYD2 physically interacts with STAT3 and NF-κB p65 and increases their methylation and phosphorylation, promoting tumor growth and metastasis [49]. STAT3 recruits the acetyltransferase p300 to enhance NF-κB acetylation and prolong its nuclear retention [50]. In addition, STAT3 and NF-κB also contribute to each other’s activation via SMYD2 [49]. Interestingly, a recent study has reported an opposite role of STAT3 in TNBC cells [51]. It was observed that STAT3 knockdown did not inhibit but promoted the growth of MDA-MB-231 cells-derived xenograft tumors, implying that the oncogenic role of STAT3 in TNBC might be context-specific [51].

Role of STAT3 in TNBC cell migration and invasion

The role of STAT3 in promoting cell migration and invasion has been linked to the upregulated expression of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), MMP9, TWIST, and Vimentin [52]. As discussed earlier, the STAT3 signaling is frequently activated through the binding of cytokines and growth factors to their corresponding receptors in cancer cells. A newly discovered cytokine termed interleukin-22 (IL-22) was recently reported to promote the migration of TNBC cells and induce their chemoresistance by activating the JAK/STAT3/MAPKs/AKT signaling pathway. The increased levels of the IL-22 producing (Th22) cells were also observed in normal, paratumor, and tumor tissues from patients with TNBC, which confirmed the importance of IL-22/JAK/STAT3/MAPKs/AKT in metastasis of this disease [53].

Recent studies reported that several upstream regulators of STAT3 signaling are involved in TNBC metastasis. Wwox blocks JAK2-STAT3 interaction and inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation, therefore repressing STAT3-driven TNBC metastasis [47]. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) has been demonstrated as a TNBC metastasis suppressor. Mechanistically, activation of GPER can inhibit the NF-κB/IL-6/STAT3 signals, cause STAT3 dephosphorylation and inactivation, and then suppress migration and angiogenesis of TNBC [54]. GPER also triggers Y397 phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in TNBC while the activation of both GPER and FAK promotes the migration of TNBC cells by increasing STAT3 nuclear accumulation and gene expression [55].

Role of STAT3 in angiogenesis of TNBC

The pro-angiogenic role of STAT3 has been partially attributed to the upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) via STAT3 transactivation [52]. A recent study demonstrated that lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) promote angiogenesis and metastasis through pSTAT3-mediated CCL5 expression in TNBC [56]. LECs are an important component of lymphatic vessels (LVs), which are prevailingly considered as the routes for cancer metastasis. Lee et al. have found that IL-6 secretion from TNBC cells causes STAT3 phosphorylation and activation, therefore inducing HIF-1α and VEGF expression. pSTAT3 also forms a ternary complex with phosphorylated c-Jun (pc-Jun) and phosphorylated activating transcription factor 2 (pATF2), which induces CCL5 expression in LECs and accelerates metastasis [56]. It was also observed that estrogen activates G protein-coupled estrogen receptor-1 (GPER-1), inhibits the expression VEGF at both protein and mRNA levels, and suppresses the tumor growth and angiogenesis in TNBC xenograft tumor models, in which STAT3 is involved [57].

Role of STAT3 in chemoresistance of TNBC

It has frequently been observed that blocking STAT3 signaling enhances the anticancer activity of chemotherapies in TNBC cells in vitro and in vivo, which endorses a critical role of STAT3 in chemosensitivity of TNBC [5861]. Several recent studies revealed the mechanisms underlying STAT3-mediated chemoresistance in different subsets of TNBC cell lines [62]. NF-κB is highly associated with resistance to cancer therapies, while the overexpression and constitutive activation STAT3-NF-κB signaling pathway have been shown to confer chemoresistance in TNBC cells [63]. Mechanistically, STAT3 upregulates the expression of a target gene TNFRSF1A (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A), which recruits TNFα to the cell surface and triggers the activation of NF-κB signaling pathway [64]. The aberrant activation of STAT3 also increases the expression levels of pluripotency transcription factors octamer-binding transcription factor-4 (Oct-4) and c-Myc, which regulate stemness-mediated doxorubicin resistance in TNBC [65]. The restoration of doxorubicin sensitivity of TNBC cells by a STAT3 inhibitor WP1066 further confirms a pivotal role of this oncogene in chemoresistance.

STAT3-mediated microRNA (miRNA) expression is emerging as a mechanism for regulating chemoresistance in TNBC. Niu et al. found that miR-181a expression is increased in TNBC due to doxorubicin treatment and contributes to acquired resistance and metastasis of this disease through repressing the expression of its target gene Bax (Bcl-2-associated x protein) [66]. Further studies have indicated that pSTAT3 at S727 not only directly binds to MIR181A1 promoter but also recruits MSK1 (mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase-1) and stabilizes its binding to MIR181A1 promoter, facilitating the transactivation [67]. The effectiveness of targeting STAT3-mediated MIR181A1 transactivation for sensitizing cells to chemotherapy and preventing metastasis has also been validated in a TNBC orthotopic model.

STAT3 is also involved in hypoxia-induced chemoresistance in TNBC [67]. Under hypoxia, the intracellular uptake of chemotherapy, especially cisplatin is dramatically reduced due to the upregulated expression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) drug transporters. Although the expression level and activity of HIF-1α was increased by hypoxia in TNBC, no significant improvement in chemoresistance was observed in TNBC cells that were treated by HIF-1α siRNA. Intriguingly, STAT3 was found to increase the expression levels of ABC transporters, especially ABCC2 (also known as multidrug resistance protein 2, MRP2) and ABCC6 (also known as MRP6) in hypoxia-treated TNBC cells, therefore conferring chemoresistance to cisplatin [67, 68]. However, another study reported that IL-6-mediated STAT3 activation induces HIF-1α expression in TNBC cells, which consequently attenuates chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity and cell apoptosis through regulating the expression of apoptosis-related proteins (Bax and Bcl-2) and drug transporters (P-glycoprotein and MRP1) [68]. The transfer RNA-derived fragments (tDRs), particularly tDR-0009 and tDR-7336 are upregulated in TNBC under hypoxia and facilitate the doxorubicin resistance through phosphorylating and activating STAT3 [69]. In addition, the combination treatment with HIF-1α and STAT3 inhibitors significantly enhances the cytotoxicity of cisplatin against TNBC cells and overcomes hypoxia-induced chemoresistance [70]. However, the role of STAT3-induced HIF-1α expression in hypoxia-induced chemoresistance is not clear so far, and further investigation is critically needed.

Role of STAT3 in immune suppression

Recent findings have established STAT3 as a powerful regulator of tumor-mediated immune suppression [21, 71]. STAT3 is not only overexpressed and activated in cancer cells but also in tumor-associated immune cells, inducing the expression of immune-suppression related genes, including IL-6, IL-10, TGF-β and VEGF and driving the escape of cancer cells from immune-mediated elimination [71]. In TNBC, STAT3 and its homolog STAT1 are also involved in regulating the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), a critical immune checkpoint that modulates the magnitude and the functional profile of T cell responses [72]. PD-L1 and PD-L2 are actually also amplified and overexpressed in TNBC cell lines due to JAK-mediated STAT3 phosphorylation and activation [73]. The mechanism studies have shown that pSTAT1 and pSTAT3 form heterodimers in the cytoplasm and translocate into the nucleus, where the pSTAT1-pSTAT3 dimers bind to the PD-L1 promoter and activate its transcription [72]. Another study has shown that syntenin1 is highly expressed in TNBC tissues and increases the expression level of PD-L1 by activating STAT3, consequently attenuates the response of TNBC to anti-PD-L1 treatment [74]. Moreover, direct inhibition of STAT3 overcomes the resistance of TNBC to immunotherapies, which confirms its immunosuppressive activity [72, 74].

Role of STAT3 in TNBC stem cell phenotypes

Early studies on STAT3 signaling disclosed an important role in stem cells self-renewal and differentiation [75]. The increasing evidence has also demonstrated that the constitutive activation of IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway contributes to the stemness of TNBC stem cells under both normal and hypoxia conditions [76, 77]. In addition, the VEGF-VEGFR-2 binding-induced STAT3 phosphorylation and activation was found to promote the self-renewal of breast cancer cells, especially TNBC cells by upregulating the expression of Myc and Sox2 (SRY-related HMG-box 2) [78]. The crosstalk of STAT3 with NF-κB and Wnt signaling pathways was also observed in TNBC cells and serves as a feed-forward loop for regulating the TNBC stem cell function [79]. Moreover, Syndecan-1 (CD138) is highly expressed in TNBC, especially inflammatory TNBC and contributes to the poor prognosis of this disease [80]. Syndecan-1 was recently reported to promote TNBC stem cells through modulating the STAT3, NF-κB, and Wnt signaling pathways together [76]. Another study by Ibrahim et al. has demonstrated the importance of IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway in Syndecan-1-modulated cancer stem cell phenotype [81]. Furthermore, Notch and EGFR signaling pathways are also implicated in the modulatory effects of Syndecan-1 on TNBC stem cells [81].

Except for cytokines and growth factors, adipokines, e.g., Leptin are also involved in the constitutive activation of the STAT3 signaling pathway. Leptin and its long form of leptin receptor (LEPRb) are enriched in breast cancer tissues and promote cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis [82]. Recently studies have shown that the binding of Leptin to LEPRb initiates the activation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, which further induces self-renewal and maintains the stem-cell state in TNBC stem cells [83]. Moreover, a new upstream regulator of the LEPR-STAT3 signaling pathway termed hematological and neurological expressed 1-like (HN1L) was also discovered to promote TNBC stem cell properties [84]. HN1L is overexpressed in TNBC tissues and correlates with the shorter survival of patients with this disease. The HN1L silencing experiments further confirmed its regulatory effects on LEPR-STAT3 signaling pathway and on TNBC stem cell population and lung metastasis [84].

Role of STAT3 in autophagy of TNBC cells

Autophagy is capable of regulating STAT3 phosphorylation status in TNBC cells [85]. Maycotte et al. discovered that the autophagy-dependent survival under unstressed conditions is enriched in TNBC, which reduces the response of cancer cells to therapy. Further studies have indicated that autophagy promotes TNBC cell survival by regulating STAT3 phosphorylation and activation [85]. Therefore, pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 may be a promising strategy for treating autophagy-dependent TNBC.

Targeting STAT3 for TNBC prevention and therapy

Abundant evidence has suggested that STAT3 may be a promising molecular target for TNBC therapy [86]. Various STAT3 inhibitors have been developed and shown some efficacy in TNBC models in vitro and in vivo, which have been summarized in Table 1. In this section, we discuss the current STAT3-targeting strategies (as shown in Fig. 3) for treating and preventing TNBC, as well as the challenges in developing more specific and effective STAT3 inhibitors.
Table 1

Summary of STAT3 inhibitors and their mechanisms of action for TNBC therapy

Inhibitors

Mechanisms of action

In vitro activity

In vivo activity

Reference

Strategy 1: Target upstream regulators of STAT3

 Carfilzomib

Inhibits IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway

Inhibits mitosis and proliferation and induces apoptosis

Reduces serum IL-6 levels in tumor-bearing mice

[87]

 Manuka honey

Inhibits IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway

Inhibits cell viability and colony formation, induces apoptosis, impairs cell migration and invasion, and inhibits angiogenesis

NR

[88]

 Bazedoxifene

Inhibits IL6/gp130/STAT3 signaling pathway

Inhibits cell viability, colony formation and cell migration and synergistically enhances the activity of paclitaxel

Suppresses tumor growth

[89, 90]

Ganoderma lucidum extract

Inhibits IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway

Inhibits cell viability and induces apoptosis

Suppresses tumor growth

[91]

 Arsenic trioxide

Inhibits EZH2/NF-κB/IL-6/STAT3/VEGF signaling pathway

Inhibits angiogenesis

NR

[96]

 Deguelin

Inhibits EGFR/STAT3 signaling pathway

Inhibits cell viability

Suppresses tumor growth

[92]

 Picrasidine G

Inhibits EGFR/STAT3 signaling pathway

Inhibits cell viability and induces apoptosis

NR

[93]

 Cantharidin

Inhibits EGFR/STAT3 signaling pathway

Inhibits cell viability and induces apoptosis

NR

[94]

 Silibinin

Inhibits JAK2/STAT3/MMP2 signaling pathway

Inhibits cell viability, migration and invasion

NR

[97]

Inhibits EGFR/STAT3/Fibronectin signaling pathway

NR

NR

[95]

 Ganoderic acid A

Inhibits JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway

Inhibits cell viability and invasive capacity and induces apoptosis

NR

[98]

 Nintedanib

Modulates SHP-1/p-STAT3 signaling pathway

Inhibits cell viability and induces apoptosis

Suppresses tumor growth

[99]

 SC-78

Modulates SHP-1/p-STAT3/VEGF-A signaling pathway

Inhibits cell migration and tube formation

Suppresses tumor growth and metastasis

[100]

 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose

Modulates SHP-1/p-STAT3 signaling pathway

NR

Suppresses tumor growth and metastasis

[101]

 SC-2001

Modulates RFX-1/SHP-1/p-STAT3 signaling pathway

Inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis

Suppresses tumor growth

[95, 102]

 Isolinderalactone

Enhances SOCS3-mediated STAT3 dephosphorylation

Inhibits cell viability and colony formation and induces apoptosis

Suppresses tumor growth

[103]

 Compound 57

Binds to HSP90 and inhibits the expression and phosphorylation of STAT3

Inhibits cell viability

NR

[104]

 L80

Binds to HSP90 and inhibits the expression and phosphorylation of STAT3

Inhibits cell viability induces apoptosis, and suppresses BCSC-like properties

Suppresses the growth of BCSC-enriched TNBC tumors and distant metastasis

[105]

 Nor-wogonin

Inhibits TAK1-mediated STAT3 activation

Inhibits cell viability and proliferation and induces G1 and G2/M phases arrest and apoptosis

NR

[106]

 Thioridazine

Inhibits DRD2-mediated STAT3 activation

Inhibits cell self-renewal, proliferation, and viability and induces G1 arrest

NR

[107]

Strategy 2: Directly bind to STAT3 and inhibit its activation

 Bt354

Directly binds to SH2 domain of STAT3 and inhibits its phosphorylation

Inhibits cell viability, induces G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis, and impairs cell migration

Suppresses tumor growth

[108]

 Osthole

Directly binds to STAT3 and inhibits its phosphorylation

Inhibits cell viability and induces G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis

Suppresses tumor growth

[109]

 Arctigenin

Directly binds to SH2 domain of STAT3 and inhibits its phosphorylation and DNA binding ability

Inhibits cell viability, induces apoptosis, impairs cell migration and invasion, and sensitizes cells to chemotherapy

Suppresses tumor growth

[110]

 Alantolactone

Directly binds to SH2 domain of STAT3 and inhibits its phosphorylation

Inhibits cell viability and colony formation and impairs cell migration and invasion

Suppresses tumor growth

[111]

 KYZ3

Directly binds to SH2 domain of STAT3 and inhibits its phosphorylation

Inhibits cell viability, induces apoptosis, and impairs cell migration

Suppresses tumor growth

[113]

Strategy 3: Inhibit STAT3 phosphorylation or acetylation

 Sesquiterpene lactones fraction of Inula helenium L.

Inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation

Inhibits cell viability and induces apoptosis

Suppresses tumor growth

[114]

Rhus coriaria

Inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation

Inhibits angiogenesis and impairs cell migration and invasion

Suppresses tumor growth and metastasis

[115]

 Schisandrin B

Inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation

Inhibits cell viability and colony formation, induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, and impairs cell migration

Suppresses tumor growth

[116]

 Eupalinolide J

Inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and activation

Inhibits cell viability

NR

[117]

 Galiellalactone analogues 16 and 17

Inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and activation

Inhibits cell viability

NR

[118]

 FZU-03,010

Inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and activation

Inhibits cell viability and induces G1 phase arrest and apoptosis

NR

[119]

 Niclosamide

Inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation

Reverses acquired radioresistance

Sensitizes tumors to irradiation

[120]

 Flubendazole

Inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation

Inhibits cell viability, induces G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis, and suppresses BCSC-like phenotype

Suppresses tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastasis

[121]

 Disulfiram

Inhibits STAT3 expression and phosphorylation

Inhibits cell viability, induces apoptosis, and impairs cancer stem cell-like properties

Suppresses tumor growth and BCSC-like properties

[122]

 Salinomycin

Inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and activation

Inhibits cell viability, promotes anoikis, impairs cell migration and invasion, and decreases CD44+/CD24 stem-like population

NR

[123]

 Metformin

Inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation

Inhibits cell viability

NR

[124]

 SH-I-14

Inhibits STAT3 acetylation and disrupts DNMT1-STAT3 interaction

Inhibits cell viability

Suppresses tumor growth

[126]

Strategy 4: Block STAT3-DNA binding

 Methylsulfonyl-methane

Inhibits the bindings of STAT3 to VEGF promoter and STAT5 to IGF-1R promoter

Inhibits cell viability and induces apoptosis

Suppresses tumor growth

[127]

 Isoharringtonine

Inhibits STAT3-mediated Nanog expression

Inhibits cell viability, impairs cell migration, and decreases proportion of BCSC population

NR

[128]

 Salidroside

Inhibits the bindings of STAT3 to MMP2 promoter

Inhibits cell migration, invasion and angiogenesis

NR

[129]

NR, not reported

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Inhibiting STAT3 signaling at multiple levels for cancer therapy. Currently, the majority of STAT3 inhibitors have been developed through (1) targeting the upstream regulators of STAT3, (2) binding to the SH2 domain of STAT3 and inhibiting its activation, (3) inhibiting STAT3 phosphorylation or acetylation, or (4) blocking STAT3-DNA binding. Other potential strategies, such as (5) inhibiting the binding of STAT3 with its co-activators, (6) modulating the binding of STAT3 with other interactive proteins, and (7) promoting STAT3 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation may also be evaluated for developing novel STAT3 inhibitors

Target upstream regulators of STAT3

The majority of STAT3 inhibitors have been identified to target the upstream regulators of STAT3 signaling. STAT3 activation is often initiated through the binding of cytokines and growth factors to their corresponding cell surface receptors. Therefore, small molecules and natural products that are able to inhibit IL-6 secretion and production, e.g., carfilzomib [87], manuka honey [88], bazedoxifene [89, 90], and Ganoderma lucidum extract [91] or suppress EGFR expression and phosphorylation, e.g., deguelin [92], picrasidine G [93], cantharidin [94], and silibinin [95] have shown significant inhibitory effects on STAT3 signaling as well as the expression of its downstream target genes in TNBC cell lines. In addition, arsenic trioxide (ATO) was reported to inhibit IL-6-mediated STAT3 activation, consequently reducing the expression of VEGF and suppressing angiogenesis [96]. Further studies have demonstrated that ATO blocks the interaction between enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) and NF-κB p65, herein suppressing the activity of NF-κB and reducing the expression of IL-6. All these indirect STAT3 inhibitors have exhibited potent in vitro and in vivo anti-TNBC activities (Table 1). However, most of them have also been found to inhibit other signaling pathways that are triggered by ligand-cell surface receptor binding in cancer cells, indicating a low level of specificity in targeting the STAT3 signaling pathway.

As discussed earlier, several protein tyrosine kinases, such as JAK2 contribute to STAT3 phosphorylation and activation in both receptor-dependent and/or receptor-independent manners. JAK2 inhibitors, including silibinin [97] and ganoderic acid A [98] were found to inhibit TNBC cell viability, migration, and invasion and induce apoptosis in vitro through inhibiting the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. However, their in vivo efficacy still needs further investigation. Targeting the intrinsic STAT3 inhibitors, such as PTPs and SOCS have been considered as a potential strategy for repressing STAT3 signaling pathway. Several natural and synthetic compounds were identified to activate one of the STAT3 PTPs, SHP-1. Among them, nintedanib and SC-78 significantly increase SHP-1 activity without affecting its expression [99, 100], while 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose (PGG) and SC-2001 largely induce the expression of SHP-1 [101, 102]. All these SHP-1 activators were also shown to inhibit STAT3 phosphorylation and the expression of its downstream target genes, thus suppressing TNBC cell growth and migration and inducing apoptosis in vitro and in vivo [99102]. In addition, isolinderalactone was reported to increase SOCS3 expression and then enhance SOCS3-mediated STAT3 dephosphorylation and inactivation [103].

As one of the major client proteins of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), STAT3 can be degraded through inhibiting HSP90. Two deguelin-derived HSP90 inhibitors, termed compound 57 and L80 have been observed to inhibit STAT3 expression and phosphorylation by interacting with the C-terminal ATP-binding pocket of HSP90 and blocking its function [104, 105]. Both compounds have also exerted their anticancer activities in TNBC models in vitro and in vivo [104, 105]. Moreover, nor-wogonin was found to inhibit the expression of transforming growth factor β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), therefore dephosphorylating STAT3 without affecting its total expression level [106]. The dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2)-targeting drug thioridazine inhibits TNBC cell self-renewal through reducing DRD2-mediated STAT3 activation [107]. Due to the highly conserved structures among STAT family members, targeting the upstream regulators always results in the wide-spectrum inhibition of all STAT proteins, causing off-target effects. Therefore, directly targeting STAT3 and/or inhibiting its functions may be more promising strategies for developing safe and effective anticancer therapeutics.

Directly bind to STAT3 and inhibit its activation

Due to advances in the understanding of the structural biology of STAT3, small molecule inhibitors have been developed to directly bind to STAT3 and inhibit its activity. Currently, many small molecule inhibitors have been designed to target the SH2 domain and block its phosphorylation, dimerization, and nuclear translocation. Several STAT3-binding small molecule inhibitors that are under preclinical and clinical investigations have shown excellent efficacy in TNBC cells in vitro and in vivo.

Recently, a dual-luciferase assay-based screening of 1563 compounds for STAT3 inhibitors was performed, leading to the identification of Bt354 [108]. Further studies have shown that Bt354 inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation, which may be attributed to the binding of this compound to the SH2 domain of STAT3. Bt354 did not cause significant changes in the expression of STAT3 upstream regulators JAK2 and Src, indicating a specific targeting effect on STAT3 [108]. Moreover, this small molecule inhibitor also suppresses the viability of TNBC cells with constitutively activated STAT3, induces the G2/M phase arrest and late apoptosis, and impairs cell migration in vitro and represses the growth of TNBC xenograft tumors in vivo [108]. Additionally, several natural products, including osthole [109], arctigenin [110], and alantolactone [111] have also been shown to directly bind to the SH2 domain of STAT3, inhibit its phosphorylation and activation, and suppress the growth and metastasis of TNBC in vitro and in vivo. Cryptotanshinone is a well-documented natural product inhibitor of STAT3, which also binds to the SH2 domain and inhibits the phosphorylation and dimerization of STAT3 [112]. KYZ3, a synthetic derivative of cryptotanshinone has recently been developed and shown to exert anticancer activity in TNBC cells in vitro and in vivo through binding to and inhibiting STAT3 activation [113]. However, none of these compounds have been evaluated for their binding affinity to STAT3. Their selectivity among STAT3 and other STAT family members is yet to be determined.

Inhibit STAT3 phosphorylation or acetylation

Except for the STAT3-binding small molecule inhibitors that we discussed above, a number of natural products and their derivatives were found to inhibit STAT3 phosphorylation and/or nuclear translocation without affecting the upstream regulators. Sesquiterpene lactones, which are enriched in the hexane fraction from Inula helenium L. have been shown to suppress tumor growth in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting STAT3 phosphorylation and decreasing the expression of the downstream target genes, including cyclin D1, c-Myc, and Bcl-2 [114]. Another crude extract from the fruits of Rhus coriaria was also discovered to inhibit angiogenesis, tumor growth and metastasis in TNBC models in vitro and in vivo by repressing STAT3 phosphorylation and STAT3-mediated VEGF expression [115]. Moreover, several natural compounds and derivatives, including schisandrin B [116], eupalinolide J [117], galiellalactone analogs 16 and 17 [118], and ursolic acid derivative FZU-03,010 [119] have shown in vitro and in vivo efficacy in TNBC models through inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation and/or nuclear translocation. None of them have been investigated for the binding ability with STAT3. Considering that these compounds did not show any significant effects on STAT3 regulators and interactive proteins, further studies for examining the potential binding between STAT3 and these compounds would provide important information regarding their underlying molecular mechanisms.

Of note, several approved drugs have shown potent inhibitory effects on pSTAT3 and may be repositioned as anticancer drugs. Niclosamide, an FDA-approved anthelmintic drug was identified as a potent STAT3 inhibitor. A recent study demonstrated that niclosamide not only inhibits TNBC cell viability but also sensitizes TNBC cells to ionizing irradiation (IR) by blocking IR-induced STAT3 phosphorylation and activation [120]. Flubendazole, another wildly used anthelmintic agent and disulfiram, a clinical drug for treating chronic alcoholism were found to eradicate TNBC stem cells-like cells that express high levels of pSTAT3 [121, 122]. Further studies showed that both drugs were able to cause TNBC cell growth arrest and apoptosis in vitro and suppress TNBC tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis in vivo by inhibiting STAT3 [121, 122]. Moreover, salinomycin, an antibacterial and coccidiostat ionophore therapeutic drug and metformin, an antidiabetic drug have exhibited potent inhibitory effects on STAT3 phosphorylation and TNBC cell growth in vitro [123, 124]. However, further evaluation of their anti-TNBC efficacy in in vivo models is critically needed.

Recent studies have disclosed that targeting STAT3 acetylation may be a potential therapeutic approach for treating cancer. SH-I-14, a newly synthesized carbazole was shown to inhibit STAT3 phosphorylation through increasing SHP-1 expression [125]. A follow-up study reported that SH-I-14 also inhibited STAT3 acetylation and disrupted DNMT1-STAT3 interaction, resulting in DNA demethylation and re-expression of tumor suppressor genes [126]. Its in vitro and in vivo activity has also been demonstrated in TNBC model, suggesting the effectiveness of inhibiting STAT3 acetylation in TNBC therapy.

Block STAT3-DNA binding

STAT3 induces the expression of its downstream targets through binding to DNA and activating the transcription. Therefore, inhibition of STAT3-DNA binding has been considered as a promising strategy to develop targeted cancer therapies. Several STAT3-DNA binding inhibitors have been developed and shown potent anticancer efficacy in TNBC cells. Methylsulfonyl-methane (MSM), a dietary supplement was found to inhibit TNBC cell viability and induce apoptosis by blocking the DNA binding abilities of STAT3 to VEGF promoter and STAT5 to IGF-1R (IGF-1 receptor) promoter and repressing the expression of VEGF and IGF-1R [127]. Considering the extremely low toxicity of MSM, it could be developed as a preventive agent for cancers harboring overexpressed and aberrantly activated STAT3. Two natural compounds, isoharringtonine and salidroside have also been demonstrated to exert their anti-TNBC activities by blocking the binding of STAT3 to Nanog and MMP2 promoters, respectively [128, 129]. However, their binding affinity to STAT3 and in vivo efficacy are yet to be studied.

As discussed above, several strategies (as shown in Fig. 3) have been developed to inhibit STAT3 signaling, i.e. 1) targeting the upstream regulators, 2) directly binding to STAT3 SH2 domain and inhibiting its activation, 3) inhibiting STAT3 phosphorylation or acetylation, and 4) blocking STAT3-DNA binding. Many small molecules have been developed and shown efficacy in preventing and treating TNBC in preclinical studies (Table 1). Several STAT3 inhibitors also enter clinical trials [130148], which have been summarized in Table 2. There are other STAT3-targeting strategies (as shown in Fig. 3) that have not been examined, including 1) inhibiting the binding of STAT3 with its co-activators (e.g., NCOA/SRC1a, APE/Ref-1, and CBP/p300) and repressing its transcriptional activity, 2) modulating the binding of STAT3 with other interactive proteins (e.g., SMYD2 and TRAF6) that regulate its activity and stability, and 3) developing STAT3-targeting PROTACs (proteolysis targeting chimeras) for promoting STAT3 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Because most of the small molecule STAT3 inhibitors have been developed to inhibit its phosphorylation and activation but not affect the protein stability, long-term treatment of these inhibitors may result in the compensatory activation of other signaling pathways, finally causing drug resistance. Therefore, small molecules, such as PROTACs that can induce STAT3 protein degradation may be used more efficiently in combination with current inhibitors for cancer therapy.
Table 2

Summary of STAT3 inhibitors in clinical trials

Inhibitors

Target

ClinicalTrials ID

Condition or disease

Phase

References

STAT3 DECOY

STAT3

NCT00696176

Head and neck cancer

Early phase 1

[130]

AZD9150

(IONIS-STAT3Rx or ISIS-STAT3Rx)

STAT3

NCT01563302

Advanced cancers, DLBCL

Phases 1 & 2

[131, 132]

NCT02417753

Ovarian cancer, GIC

Phase 2

NCT01839604

HCC

Phase 1

NCT02983578

GIC, lung cancer, etc.

Phase 2

NCT03527147

NHL, DLBCL, NHL, DLBCL

Phase 1

NCT02549651

DLBCL

Phase 1

NCT03421353

Advanced solid tumors

Phases 1 & 2

TTI-101

(C188–9)

STAT3

NCT03195699

Breast cancer, HNSCC, NSCLC, etc.

Phase 1

[133]

OPB-51602

STAT3

NCT02058017

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Phase 1

[134]

NCT01867073

Advanced solid tumors

Phase 1

NCT01423903

Advanced cancer

Phase 1

OPB-31121

STAT3

NCT00955812

Advanced cancer, solid tumor

Phase 1

[136]

OPB-111077

STAT3

NCT01711034

Solid tumors

Phase 1

[137]

Napabucasin (BBI608 or GB201)

STAT3

NCT03647839

MCC

Phase 2

[135]

NCT03522649

Previously treated MCC

Phase 3

NCT02826161

NSCLC

Phase 3

NCT02993731

Pancreatic ductal carcinoma

Phase 3

Pyrimethamine

STAT3

NCT01066663

CLL, SLL

Phases 1 & 2

[138]

NCT03057990

Myelodysplastic syndromes

Phase 1

Simvastatin

STAT3

NCT02390843

Retinoblastoma, clear cell sarcoma, renal cell carcinoma, rhabdoid tumor, etc.

Phase 1

[139]

DSP-0337

STAT3

NCT03416816

Neoplasms

Phase 1

[140]

Cetuximab

EGFR

NCT01445405

Squamous carcinoma, head and neck cancer, etc.

Phase 1

[141]

Lapatinib

EGFR

NCT00105950

Breast neoplasms

Phase 2

[142]

Dasatinib

c-Src

NCT02680951

AML

Phase 1

[143]

SC-43

SHP-1

NCT03443622

Refractory solid tumor

Phase 1

[144]

ASN002

JAK

NCT02440685

Lymphoma, leukemia

Phases 1 & 2

[145]

SAR302503

JAK2

NCT01420783

Hematopoietic neoplasm

Phase 2

[146]

AZD1480

JAK2

NCT01112397

Solid malignancies

Phase 1

[147]

WP1066

JAK2

NCT01904123

Metastatic melanoma, recurrent glioblastoma, etc.

Phase 1

[148]

AML Acute myeloid leukemia, CLL Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, DLBCL Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, GIC Gastrointestinal cancer, HCC Hepatocellular carcinoma, HNSCC Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, MCC Metastatic colorectal cancer, NHL Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, NSCLC Non-small cell lung cancer, SLL Small lymphocytic leukemia

Conclusions

TNBC is still a treatable but incurable disease with complex genetic heterogeneity. The STAT3 oncogene is overexpressed and constitutively activated in TNBC and is associated with the high metastatic risk and poor survival outcomes. Moreover, STAT3 not only acts as a transcription factor to activate the expression of its downstream target genes but also localizes to mitochondria and regulates its functions, then regulating the various aspects of TNBC cells. Many STAT3-targeted therapies have been successfully developed and shown efficacy in preclinical models of TNBC in vitro and in vivo; several STAT3 inhibitors even enter clinical trials and are currently under investigation in various human cancers, including TNBC. In addition to its role in cancer cells, STAT3 also plays a pivotal role in the immune system. Indeed, STAT3 inhibitors have been found to suppress tumor cells but also boost immune cell responses. Therefore, the STAT3 oncogene is a promising target for TNBC prevention and therapy.

Of note, targeting STAT3 alone has shown excellent anti-TNBC activities in preclinical settings. However, TNBC has been reported to harbor multiple genetic alterations, including STAT3 overexpression and constitutive activation which contribute to the initiation, progression, metastasis, and drug resistance of this disease. Therefore, STAT3 inhibition combined with other targeted therapies may be more effective in treating TNBC. Considering that STAT3 plays a crucial role in chemoresistance, the combination of STAT3 inhibitors with other chemotherapies may exert synergistic effects in treating TNBC. Therefore, further studies are warranted to demonstrate the preventive and therapeutic efficacy of STAT3 inhibitors alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or other targeted therapies in clinical studies. Moreover, new targeting strategies, i.e. inducing the degradation of STAT3 protein through PROTAC or inhibiting the binding of STAT3 to its co-activators and other interactive proteins can be examined, which may lead to more specific and effective inhibitors for TNBC prevention and therapy.

Notes

Abbreviations

ABC: 

ATP-binding cassette

AML: 

Acute myeloid leukemia

APE/Ref-1: 

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease-1/redox factor-1

ATO: 

Arsenic trioxide

Bax: 

Bcl-2-associated x protein

Bcl-2: 

B-cell lymphoma-2

Bcl-xL: 

B-cell lymphoma-extra Large

bFGF: 

Basic fibroblast growth factor

CBP: 

CREB-binding protein

CCD: 

Coiled-coil domain

CLL: 

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

DBD: 

DNA binding domain

DLBCL: 

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

DRD2: 

Dopamine receptor D2

EGF: 

Epidermal growth factor

EGFR: 

Epidermal growth factor receptor

ER: 

Estrogen receptor

EZH2: 

Enhancer of zeste homolog 2

FAK: 

Focal adhesion kinase

FGFR: 

Fibroblast growth factor receptor

GGNBP2: 

Gametogenetin-binding protein 2

GIC: 

Gastrointestinal cancer

gp130: 

Glycoprotein 130

GPER: 

G protein-coupled estrogen receptor

GPER-1: 

G protein-coupled estrogen receptor-1

GRIM-19: 

Gene associated with retinoic-interferon-induced mortality 19

HCC: 

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HER2: 

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

HGF: 

Hepatocyte growth factor

HIF-1α: 

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha

HN1L: 

Hematological and neurological expressed 1-like

HNSCC: 

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

HSP90: 

Heat shock protein 90

IGF-1R: 

IGF-1 receptor

IGFR: 

Insulin-like growth factor receptor

IL-10R: 

Interleukin-10 receptor

IL-22: 

Interleukin-22

IL-6: 

Interleukin-6

IL-6R: 

Interleukin-6 receptor

IR: 

Ionizing irradiation

JAKs: 

Janus kinases

LECs: 

Lymphatic endothelial cells

LEPRb: 

Long form of leptin receptor

LVs: 

Lymphatic vessels

MCC: 

Metastatic colorectal cancer

miRNA: 

MicroRNA

MMP: 

Matrix metalloproteinase

MRP2: 

Multidrug resistance protein 2

MSK1: 

Mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase-1

MSM: 

Methylsulfonyl-methane

NF-κB: 

Nuclear factor-kappa B

NHL: 

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

NSCLC: 

Non-small cell lung cancer

Oct-4: 

Octamer-binding transcription factor-4

PARP: 

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase

pATF2: 

Phosphorylated activating transcription factor 2

pc-Jun: 

Phosphorylated c-Jun

PD-L1: 

Programmed death ligand 1

PGG: 

1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose

PIAS: 

Protein inhibitor of activated STAT

PR: 

Progesterone receptor

PROTACs: 

Proteolysis targeting chimeras

pSTAT3: 

Phosphorylated STAT3

PTPRT: 

Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor T

PTPs: 

Protein tyrosine phosphatases

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

SH2: 

SRC homology 2

SHP-1/2: 

Src homology domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases 1/2

SLL: 

Small lymphocytic leukemia

SMYD2: 

SET and MYND domain 2

SOCS: 

Suppressors of cytokine signaling

Sox2: 

SRY-related HMG-box 2

STAT3: 

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

TAD: 

Transactivation domain

TAK1: 

Transforming growth factor β-activated kinase 1

TC-PTP: 

T-cell protein-tyrosine phosphatase

tDRs: 

Transfer RNA-derived fragments

TNBC: 

Triple negative breast cancer

TNFRSF1A: 

Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A

TRAF6: 

Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6

UTR: 

3′-untranslated region

VEGF: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor

Wwox: 

WW domain-containing oxidoreductase

XPO1: 

Exportin 1

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the current and former members of our laboratories and collaborators for their contributions to the publications cited in this review article. The research field in STAT3 is rapidly growing, and we apologize for not being able to cite all the recent publications, due to space limitation.

Funding

JJQ was supported by Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Startup Funding (111100E014). WDZ was supported by Professor of Chang Jiang Scholars Program, NSFC (81520108030, 21472238), Shanghai Engineering Research Center for the Preparation of Bioactive Natural Products (16DZ2280200), the Scientific Foundation of Shanghai China (13401900103, 13401900101), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1700200).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

JJQ and WDZ conceptualized the manuscript. JJQ, LY, and JZ collected the literature, wrote the manuscript and made the figures. JJQ and WDZ edited and made significant revisions to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 548 Binwen Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China
(2)
School of Pharmacy, Naval Medical University, 325 Guohe Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China
(3)
Shanxi Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan, 030012, China
(4)
Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China

References

  1. Waks AG, Winer EP. Breast Cancer treatment: a review. JAMA. 2019;321(3):288–300.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Sharma P. Update on the treatment of early-stage triple-negative breast Cancer. Curr Treat Options in Oncol. 2018;19(5):22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Walsh EM, Keane MM, Wink DA, Callagy G, Glynn SA. Review of triple negative breast Cancer and the impact of inducible nitric oxide synthase on tumor biology and patient outcomes. Crit Rev Oncog. 2016;21(5–6):333–51.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim C, Gao R, Sei E, Brandt R, Hartman J, Hatschek T, et al. Chemoresistance evolution in triple-negative breast Cancer delineated by single-cell sequencing. Cell. 2018;173(4):879–93 e813.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Robert M, Patsouris A, Frenel JS, Gourmelon C, Augereau P, Campone M. Emerging PARP inhibitors for treating breast cancer. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2018;23(3):211–21.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa R, Shah AN, Santa-Maria CA, Cruz MR, Mahalingam D, Carneiro BA, et al. Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor in triple negative breast cancer: new discoveries and practical insights for drug development. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;53:111–9.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Vikas P, Borcherding N, Zhang W. The clinical promise of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:6823–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sirkisoon SR, Carpenter RL, Rimkus T, Anderson A, Harrison A, Lange AM, et al. Interaction between STAT3 and GLI1/tGLI1 oncogenic transcription factors promotes the aggressiveness of triple-negative breast cancers and HER2-enriched breast cancer. Oncogene. 2018;37(19):2502–14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta I, Sareyeldin RM, Al-Hashimi I, Al-Thawadi HA, Al Farsi H, Vranic S, et al. Triple Negative Breast Cancer Profile, from Gene to microRNA, in Relation to Ethnicity. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(3):363.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bousoik E, Montazeri Aliabadi H. “Do we know Jack” about JAK? A closer look at JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Front Oncol. 2018;8:287.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Furtek SL, Backos DS, Matheson CJ, Reigan P. Strategies and approaches of targeting STAT3 for Cancer treatment. ACS Chem Biol. 2016;11(2):308–18.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhuang S. Regulation of STAT signaling by acetylation. Cell Signal. 2013;25(9):1924–31.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Akira S, Nishio Y, Inoue M, Wang XJ, Wei S, Matsusaka T, et al. Molecular cloning of APRF, a novel IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 p91-related transcription factor involved in the gp130-mediated signaling pathway. Cell. 1994;77(1):63–71.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhong Z, Wen Z, Darnell JE Jr. Stat3: a STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Science. 1994;264(5155):95–8.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Huynh J, Chand A, Gough D, Ernst M. Therapeutically exploiting STAT3 activity in cancer - using tissue repair as a road map. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(2):82–96.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson DE, O'Keefe RA, Grandis JR. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(4):234–48.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Yu H, Lee H, Herrmann A, Buettner R, Jove R. Revisiting STAT3 signalling in cancer: new and unexpected biological functions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(11):736–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Guanizo AC, Fernando CD, Garama DJ, Gough DJ. STAT3: a multifaceted oncoprotein. Growth Factors. 2018;36(1–2):1–14.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Garbers C, Aparicio-Siegmund S, Rose-John S. The IL-6/gp130/STAT3 signaling axis: recent advances towards specific inhibition. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;34:75–82.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Karras JG, Wang Z, Huo L, Howard RG, Frank DA, Rothstein TL. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) is constitutively activated in normal, self-renewing B-1 cells but only inducibly expressed in conventional B lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1997;185(6):1035–42.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang Y, Shen Y, Wang S, Shen Q, Zhou X. The role of STAT3 in leading the crosstalk between human cancers and the immune system. Cancer Lett. 2018;415:117–28.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Yu H, Kortylewski M, Pardoll D. Crosstalk between cancer and immune cells: role of STAT3 in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(1):41–51.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang YH, Molavi O, Alshareef A, Haque M, Wang Q, Chu MP, et al. Constitutive activation of STAT3 in myeloma cells cultured in a three-dimensional, reconstructed bone marrow model. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(6):206.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Quarta S, Baeumer BE, Scherbakov N, Andratsch M, Rose-John S, Dechant G, et al. Peripheral nerve regeneration and NGF-dependent neurite outgrowth of adult sensory neurons converge on STAT3 phosphorylation downstream of neuropoietic cytokine receptor gp130. J Neurosci. 2014;34(39):13222–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hruz P, Dann SM, Eckmann L. STAT3 and its activators in intestinal defense and mucosal homeostasis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26(2):109–15.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Morris R, Kershaw NJ, Babon JJ. The molecular details of cytokine signaling via the JAK/STAT pathway. Protein Sci. 2018;27(12):1984–2009.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Bousquet C, Susini C, Melmed S. Inhibitory roles for SHP-1 and SOCS-3 following pituitary proopiomelanocortin induction by leukemia inhibitory factor. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(9):1277–85.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim H, Baumann H. Dual signaling role of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 in regulating expression of acute-phase plasma proteins by interleukin-6 cytokine receptors in hepatic cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(8):5326–38.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim DJ, Tremblay ML, Digiovanni J. Protein tyrosine phosphatases, TC-PTP, SHP1, and SHP2, cooperate in rapid dephosphorylation of Stat3 in keratinocytes following UVB irradiation. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10290.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wakahara R, Kunimoto H, Tanino K, Kojima H, Inoue A, Shintaku H, et al. Phospho-Ser727 of STAT3 regulates STAT3 activity by enhancing dephosphorylation of phospho-Tyr705 largely through TC45. Genes Cells. 2012;17(2):132–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin-Granados C, Prescott AR, Le Sommer S, Klaska IP, Yu T, Muckersie E, et al. A key role for PTP1B in dendritic cell maturation, migration, and T cell activation. J Mol Cell Biol. 2015;7(6):517–28.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Naka T, Narazaki M, Hirata M, Matsumoto T, Minamoto S, Aono A, et al. Structure and function of a new STAT-induced STAT inhibitor. Nature. 1997;387(6636):924–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yagil Z, Nechushtan H, Kay G, Yang CM, Kemeny DM, Razin E. The enigma of the role of protein inhibitor of activated STAT3 (PIAS3) in the immune response. Trends Immunol. 2010;31(5):199–204.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wei J, Yuan Y, Jin C, Chen H, Leng L, He F, et al. The ubiquitin ligase TRAF6 negatively regulates the JAK-STAT signaling pathway by binding to STAT3 and mediating its ubiquitination. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49567.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu Z, Wang S, Zhu J, Yang Q, Dong H, Huang J. MicroRNA-544 down-regulates both Bcl6 and Stat3 to inhibit tumor growth of human triple negative breast cancer. Biol Chem. 2016;397(10):1087–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang W, Qu X, Chen B, Snyder M, Wang M, Li B, et al. Critical roles of STAT3 in beta-adrenergic functions in the heart. Circulation. 2016;133(1):48–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhou T, Chao L, Rong G, Wang C, Ma R, Wang X. Down-regulation of GRIM-19 is associated with STAT3 overexpression in breast carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2013;44(9):1773–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Shields BJ, Wiede F, Gurzov EN, Wee K, Hauser C, Zhu HJ, et al. TCPTP regulates SFK and STAT3 signaling and is lost in triple-negative breast cancers. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(3):557–70.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang R, Rincon M. Mitochondrial Stat3, the need for design thinking. Int J Biol Sci. 2016;12(5):532–44.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wegrzyn J, Potla R, Chwae YJ, Sepuri NB, Zhang Q, Koeck T, et al. Function of mitochondrial Stat3 in cellular respiration. Science. 2009;323(5915):793–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang Q, Raje V, Yakovlev VA, Yacoub A, Szczepanek K, Meier J, et al. Mitochondrial localized Stat3 promotes breast cancer growth via phosphorylation of serine 727. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(43):31280–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee H, Zhang P, Herrmann A, Yang C, Xin H, Wang Z, et al. Acetylated STAT3 is crucial for methylation of tumor-suppressor gene promoters and inhibition by resveratrol results in demethylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(20):7765–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Diaz N, Minton S, Cox C, Bowman T, Gritsko T, Garcia R, et al. Activation of stat3 in primary tumors from high-risk breast cancer patients is associated with elevated levels of activated SRC and survivin expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(1):20–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Gritsko T, Williams A, Turkson J, Kaneko S, Bowman T, Huang M, et al. Persistent activation of stat3 signaling induces survivin gene expression and confers resistance to apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(1):11–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Cheng Y, Holloway MP, Nguyen K, McCauley D, Landesman Y, Kauffman MG, et al. XPO1 (CRM1) inhibition represses STAT3 activation to drive a survivin-dependent oncogenic switch in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(3):675–86.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Nam K, Son SH, Oh S, Jeon D, Kim H, Noh DY, et al. Binding of galectin-1 to integrin beta1 potentiates drug resistance by promoting survivin expression in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(22):35804–23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Chang R, Song L, Xu Y, Wu Y, Dai C, Wang X, et al. Loss of Wwox drives metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer by JAK2/STAT3 axis. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3486.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Liu J, Liu L, Yague E, Yang Q, Pan T, Zhao H, et al. GGNBP2 suppresses triple-negative breast cancer aggressiveness through inhibition of IL-6/STAT3 signaling activation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174(1):65–78.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Li LX, Zhou JX, Calvet JP, Godwin AK, Jensen RA, Li X. Lysine methyltransferase SMYD2 promotes triple negative breast cancer progression. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(3):326.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Lee H, Herrmann A, Deng JH, Kujawski M, Niu G, Li Z, et al. Persistently activated Stat3 maintains constitutive NF-kappaB activity in tumors. Cancer Cell. 2009;15(4):283–93.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Banerjee K, Pru C, Pru JK, Resat H. STAT3 knockdown induces tumor formation by MDA-MB-231 cells. Clin Oncol Res. 2018;1(1).Google Scholar
  52. Kamran MZ, Patil P, Gude RP. Role of STAT3 in cancer metastasis and translational advances. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:421821.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang S, Yao Y, Yao M, Fu P, Wang W. Interleukin-22 promotes triple negative breast cancer cells migration and paclitaxel resistance through JAK-STAT3/MAPKs/AKT signaling pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503(3):1605–9.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Liang S, Chen Z, Jiang G, Zhou Y, Liu Q, Su Q, et al. Activation of GPER suppresses migration and angiogenesis of triple negative breast cancer via inhibition of NF-kappaB/IL-6 signals. Cancer Lett. 2017;386:12–23.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Rigiracciolo DC, Santolla MF, Lappano R, Vivacqua A, Cirillo F, Galli GR, et al. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activation by estrogens involves GPER in triple-negative breast cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):58.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Lee E, Fertig EJ, Jin K, Sukumar S, Pandey NB, Popel AS. Breast cancer cells condition lymphatic endothelial cells within pre-metastatic niches to promote metastasis. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4715.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang C, Li J, Ye S, Zhang Y, Li P, Wang L, et al. Oestrogen inhibits VEGF expression and angiogenesis in triple-negative breast Cancer by activating GPER-1. J Cancer. 2018;9(20):3802–11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Liu CY, Su JC, Huang TT, Chu PY, Huang CT, Wang WL, et al. Sorafenib analogue SC-60 induces apoptosis through the SHP-1/STAT3 pathway and enhances docetaxel cytotoxicity in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Mol Oncol. 2017;11(3):266–79.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Liu CY, Chen KF, Chao TI, Chu PY, Huang CT, Huang TT, et al. Sequential combination of docetaxel with a SHP-1 agonist enhanced suppression of p-STAT3 signaling and apoptosis in triple negative breast cancer cells. J Mol Med (Berl). 2017;95(9):965–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Fatehi D, Soltani A, Ghatrehsamani M. SRT1720, a potential sensitizer for radiotherapy and cytotoxicity effects of NVB-BEZ235 in metastatic breast cancer cells. Pathol Res Pract. 2018;214(6):889–95.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Tzeng YT, Liu PF, Li JY, Liu LF, Kuo SY, Hsieh CW, et al. Kinome-wide siRNA screening identifies Src-enhanced resistance of chemotherapeutic drugs in triple-negative breast Cancer cells. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1285.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Moreira MP, da Conceicao Braga L, Cassali GD, Silva LM. STAT3 as a promising chemoresistance biomarker associated with the CD44(+/high)/CD24(−/low)/ALDH(+) BCSCs-like subset of the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line. Exp Cell Res. 2018;363(2):283–90.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Kuo WY, Hwu L, Wu CY, Lee JS, Chang CW, Liu RS. STAT3/NF-kappaB-regulated lentiviral TK/GCV suicide gene therapy for cisplatin-resistant triple-negative breast Cancer. Theranostics. 2017;7(3):647–63.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Egusquiaguirre SP, Yeh JE, Walker SR, Liu S, Frank DA. The STAT3 target gene TNFRSF1A modulates the NF-kappaB pathway in breast Cancer cells. Neoplasia. 2018;20(5):489–98.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Cheng CC, Shi LH, Wang XJ, Wang SX, Wan XQ, Liu SR, et al. Stat3/Oct-4/c-Myc signal circuit for regulating stemness-mediated doxorubicin resistance of triple-negative breast cancer cells and inhibitory effects of WP1066. Int J Oncol. 2018;53(1):339–48.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Niu J, Xue A, Chi Y, Xue J, Wang W, Zhao Z, et al. Induction of miRNA-181a by genotoxic treatments promotes chemotherapeutic resistance and metastasis in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2016;35(10):1302–13.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Soleymani Abyaneh H, Gupta N, Radziwon-Balicka A, Jurasz P, Seubert J, Lai R, et al. STAT3 but not HIF-1alpha is important in mediating hypoxia-induced Chemoresistance in MDA-MB-231, a triple negative breast Cancer cell line. Cancers (Basel). 2017;9(10):137.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang K, Zhu X, Zhang K, Yin Y, Chen Y, Zhang T. Interleukin-6 contributes to chemoresistance in MDA-MB-231 cells via targeting HIF-1alpha. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2018;32(3):e22039.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Cui Y, Huang Y, Wu X, Zheng M, Xia Y, Fu Z, et al. Hypoxia-induced tRNA-derived fragments, novel regulatory factor for doxorubicin resistance in triple-negative breast cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(6):8740–51.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Soleymani Abyaneh H, Soleimani AH, Vakili MR, Soudy R, Kaur K, Cuda F, et al. Modulation of hypoxia-induced Chemoresistance to polymeric micellar cisplatin: the effect of ligand modification of micellar carrier versus inhibition of the mediators of drug resistance. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10(4):196.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Kitamura H, Ohno Y, Toyoshima Y, Ohtake J, Homma S, Kawamura H, et al. Interleukin-6/STAT3 signaling as a promising target to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Sci. 2017;108(10):1947–52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Sasidharan Nair V, Toor SM, Ali BR, Elkord E. Dual inhibition of STAT1 and STAT3 activation downregulates expression of PD-L1 in human breast cancer cells. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2018;22(6):547–57.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Chen M, Pockaj B, Andreozzi M, Barrett MT, Krishna S, Eaton S, et al. JAK2 and PD-L1 amplification enhance the dynamic expression of PD-L1 in triple-negative breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(5):e1205–15.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Liu J, Yang Y, Wang H, Wang B, Zhao K, Jiang W, et al. Syntenin1/MDA-9 (SDCBP) induces immune evasion in triple-negative breast cancer by upregulating PD-L1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;171(2):345–57.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Galoczova M, Coates P, Vojtesek B. STAT3, stem cells, cancer stem cells and p63. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2018;23:12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Ibrahim SA, Hassan H, Vilardo L, Kumar SK, Kumar AV, Kelsch R, et al. Syndecan-1 (CD138) modulates triple-negative breast cancer stem cell properties via regulation of LRP-6 and IL-6-mediated STAT3 signaling. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e85737.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Soleymani Abyaneh H, Gupta N, Alshareef A, Gopal K, Lavasanifar A, Lai R. Hypoxia induces the Acquisition of Cancer Stem-like Phenotype via Upregulation and Activation of signal transducer and activator of Transcription-3 (STAT3) in MDA-MB-231, a triple negative breast Cancer cell line. Cancer Microenviron. 2018;11(2–3):141–52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhao D, Pan C, Sun J, Gilbert C, Drews-Elger K, Azzam DJ, et al. VEGF drives cancer-initiating stem cells through VEGFR-2/Stat3 signaling to upregulate Myc and Sox2. Oncogene. 2015;34(24):3107–19.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Jarnicki A, Putoczki T, Ernst M. Stat3: linking inflammation to epithelial cancer - more than a “gut” feeling? Cell Div. 2010;5:14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Nguyen TL, Grizzle WE, Zhang K, Hameed O, Siegal GP, Wei S. Syndecan-1 overexpression is associated with nonluminal subtypes and poor prognosis in advanced breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140(4):468–74.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Ibrahim SA, Gadalla R, El-Ghonaimy EA, Samir O, Mohamed HT, Hassan H, et al. Syndecan-1 is a novel molecular marker for triple negative inflammatory breast cancer and modulates the cancer stem cell phenotype via the IL-6/STAT3, notch and EGFR signaling pathways. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):57.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Zheng Q, Dunlap SM, Zhu J, Downs-Kelly E, Rich J, Hursting SD, et al. Leptin deficiency suppresses MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary tumor growth in obese mice and abrogates tumor initiating cell survival. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011;18(4):491–503.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Thiagarajan PS, Zheng Q, Bhagrath M, Mulkearns-Hubert EE, Myers MG, Lathia JD, et al. STAT3 activation by leptin receptor is essential for TNBC stem cell maintenance. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017;24(8):415–26.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Liu Y, Choi DS, Sheng J, Ensor JE, Liang DH, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, et al. HN1L promotes triple-negative breast Cancer stem cells through LEPR-STAT3 pathway. Stem Cell Reports. 2018;10(1):212–27.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Maycotte P, Gearheart CM, Barnard R, Aryal S, Mulcahy Levy JM, Fosmire SP, et al. STAT3-mediated autophagy dependence identifies subtypes of breast cancer where autophagy inhibition can be efficacious. Cancer Res. 2014;74(9):2579–90.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Huynh J, Etemadi N, Hollande F, Ernst M, Buchert M. The JAK/STAT3 axis: a comprehensive drug target for solid malignancies. Semin Cancer Biol. 2017;45:13–22.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Vyas D, Lopez-Hisijos N, Shah P, Deshpande KS, Basson MD, Vyas A, et al. A second-generation proteasome inhibitor and doxorubicin modulates IL-6, pSTAT-3 and NF-kB activity in MDA-MB-231 breast Cancer cells. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2017;17(1):175–85.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Aryappalli P, Al-Qubaisi SS, Attoub S, George JA, Arafat K, Ramadi KB, et al. The IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway is an early target of Manuka honey-induced suppression of human breast Cancer cells. Front Oncol. 2017;7:167.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Tian J, Chen X, Fu S, Zhang R, Pan L, Cao Y, et al. Bazedoxifene is a novel IL-6/GP130 inhibitor for treating triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019.Google Scholar
  90. Fu S, Chen X, Lo HW, Lin J. Combined bazedoxifene and paclitaxel treatments inhibit cell viability, cell migration, colony formation, and tumor growth and induce apoptosis in breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2019;448:11–9.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Rios-Fuller TJ, Ortiz-Soto G, Lacourt-Ventura M, Maldonado-Martinez G, Cubano LA, Schneider RJ, et al. Ganoderma lucidum extract (GLE) impairs breast cancer stem cells by targeting the STAT3 pathway. Oncotarget. 2018;9(89):35907–21.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Mehta R, Katta H, Alimirah F, Patel R, Murillo G, Peng X, et al. Deguelin action involves c-met and EGFR signaling pathways in triple negative breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65113.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Yamashita N, Kondo M, Zhao S, Li W, Koike K, Nemoto K, et al. Picrasidine G decreases viability of MDA-MB 468 EGFR-overexpressing triple-negative breast cancer cells through inhibition of EGFR/STAT3 signaling pathway. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2017;27(11):2608–12.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Chun J, Park MK, Ko H, Lee K, Kim YS. Bioassay-guided isolation of cantharidin from blister beetles and its anticancer activity through inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated STAT3 and Akt pathways. J Nat Med. 2018;72(4):937–45.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Kim S, Jeon M, Lee J, Han J, Oh SJ, Jung T, et al. Induction of fibronectin in response to epidermal growth factor is suppressed by silibinin through the inhibition of STAT3 in triple negative breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2014;32(5):2230–6.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Jiang F, Li Y, Si L, Zhang Z, Li Z. Interaction of EZH2 and P65 is involved in the arsenic trioxide-induced anti-angiogenesis in human triple-negative breast cancer cells. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2019.Google Scholar
  97. Byun HJ, Darvin P, Kang DY, Sp N, Joung YH, Park JH, et al. Silibinin downregulates MMP2 expression via Jak2/STAT3 pathway and inhibits the migration and invasive potential in MDA-MB-231 cells. Oncol Rep. 2017;37(6):3270–8.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  98. Yang Y, Zhou H, Liu W, Wu J, Yue X, Wang J, et al. Ganoderic acid a exerts antitumor activity against MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells by inhibiting the Janus kinase 2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(5):6515–21.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Liu CY, Huang TT, Chu PY, Huang CT, Lee CH, Wang WL, et al. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib activates SHP-1 and induces apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Exp Mol Med. 2017;49(8):e366.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Su JC, Mar AC, Wu SH, Tai WT, Chu PY, Wu CY, et al. Disrupting VEGF-A paracrine and autocrine loops by targeting SHP-1 suppresses triple negative breast cancer metastasis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28888.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Lee HJ, Seo NJ, Jeong SJ, Park Y, Jung DB, Koh W, et al. Oral administration of penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose suppresses triple-negative breast cancer xenograft growth and metastasis in strong association with JAK1-STAT3 inhibition. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(6):804–11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Liu CY, Su JC, Ni MH, Tseng LM, Chu PY, Wang DS, et al. Obatoclax analog SC-2001 inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation through enhancing SHP-1 expression and induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(1):71–84.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  103. Yen MC, Shih YC, Hsu YL, Lin ES, Lin YS, Tsai EM, et al. Isolinderalactone enhances the inhibition of SOCS3 on STAT3 activity by decreasing miR-30c in breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2016;35(3):1356–64.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  104. Kim HS, Hoang VH, Hong M, Chul Kim K, Ann J, Nguyen CT, et al. Investigation of B,C-ring truncated deguelin derivatives as heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors for use as anti-breast cancer agents. Bioorg Med Chem. 2019;27(7):1370–81.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  105. Cho TM, Kim JY, Kim YJ, Sung D, Oh E, Jang S, et al. C-terminal HSP90 inhibitor L80 elicits anti-metastatic effects in triple-negative breast cancer via STAT3 inhibition. Cancer Lett. 2019;447:141–53.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  106. Abd El-Hafeez AA, Khalifa HO, Mahdy EAM, Sharma V, Hosoi T, Ghosh P, et al. Anticancer effect of nor-wogonin (5, 7, 8-trihydroxyflavone) on human triple-negative breast cancer cells via downregulation of TAK1, NF-kappaB, and STAT3. Pharmacol Rep. 2019;71(2):289–98.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  107. Tegowski M, Fan C, Baldwin AS. Thioridazine inhibits self-renewal in breast cancer cells via DRD2-dependent STAT3 inhibition, but induces a G1 arrest independent of DRD2. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(41):15977–90.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  108. Chen Y, Ji M, Zhang S, Xue N, Xu H, Lin S, et al. Bt354 as a new STAT3 signaling pathway inhibitor against triple negative breast cancer. J Drug Target. 2018;26(10):920–30.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  109. Dai X, Yin C, Zhang Y, Guo G, Zhao C, Wang O, et al. Osthole inhibits triple negative breast cancer cells by suppressing STAT3. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):322.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Feng T, Cao W, Shen W, Zhang L, Gu X, Guo Y, et al. Arctigenin inhibits STAT3 and exhibits anticancer potential in human triple-negative breast cancer therapy. Oncotarget. 2017;8(1):329–44.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  111. Chun J, Li RJ, Cheng MS, Kim YS. Alantolactone selectively suppresses STAT3 activation and exhibits potent anticancer activity in MDA-MB-231 cells. Cancer Lett. 2015;357(1):393–403.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  112. Shin DS, Kim HN, Shin KD, Yoon YJ, Kim SJ, Han DC, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibits constitutive signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 function through blocking the dimerization in DU145 prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69(1):193–202.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  113. Zhang W, Yu W, Cai G, Zhu J, Zhang C, Li S, et al. A new synthetic derivative of cryptotanshinone KYZ3 as STAT3 inhibitor for triple-negative breast cancer therapy. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(11):1098.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Chun J, Song K, Kim YS. Sesquiterpene lactones-enriched fraction of Inula helenium L. induces apoptosis through inhibition of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 signaling pathway in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Phytother Res. 2018;32(12):2501–9.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  115. El Hasasna H, Saleh A, Al Samri H, Athamneh K, Attoub S, Arafat K, et al. Rhus coriaria suppresses angiogenesis, metastasis and tumor growth of breast cancer through inhibition of STAT3, NFkappaB and nitric oxide pathways. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21144.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Dai X, Yin C, Guo G, Zhang Y, Zhao C, Qian J, et al. Schisandrin B exhibits potent anticancer activity in triple negative breast cancer by inhibiting STAT3. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018;358:110–9.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Yang B, Shen JW, Zhou DH, Zhao YP, Wang WQ, Zhu Y, et al. Precise discovery of a STAT3 inhibitor from Eupatorium lindleyanum and evaluation of its activity of anti-triple-negative breast cancer. Nat Prod Res. 2019;33:477-85.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  118. Kim HS, Kim T, Ko H, Lee J, Kim YS, Suh YG. Identification of galiellalactone-based novel STAT3-selective inhibitors with cytotoxic activities against triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. Bioorg Med Chem. 2017;25(19):5032–40.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  119. Li W, Zhang H, Nie M, Tian Y, Chen X, Chen C, et al. Ursolic acid derivative FZU-03,010 inhibits STAT3 and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in renal and breast cancer cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin Shanghai. 2017;49(4):367–73.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  120. Lu L, Dong J, Wang L, Xia Q, Zhang D, Kim H, et al. Activation of STAT3 and Bcl-2 and reduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) promote radioresistance in breast cancer and overcome of radioresistance with niclosamide. Oncogene. 2018;37(39):5292–304.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  121. Oh E, Kim YJ, An H, Sung D, Cho TM, Farrand L, et al. Flubendazole elicits anti-metastatic effects in triple-negative breast cancer via STAT3 inhibition. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(8):1978–93.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  122. Kim YJ, Kim JY, Lee N, Oh E, Sung D, Cho TM, et al. Disulfiram suppresses cancer stem-like properties and STAT3 signaling in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;486(4):1069–76.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  123. An H, Kim JY, Oh E, Lee N, Cho Y, Seo JH. Salinomycin promotes Anoikis and decreases the CD44+/CD24- stem-like population via inhibition of STAT3 activation in MDA-MB-231 cells. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0141919.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Deng XS, Wang S, Deng A, Liu B, Edgerton SM, Lind SE, et al. Metformin targets Stat3 to inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancers. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(2):367–76.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  125. Hou S, Yi YW, Kang HJ, Zhang L, Kim HJ, Kong Y, et al. Novel carbazole inhibits phospho-STAT3 through induction of protein-tyrosine phosphatase PTPN6. J Med Chem. 2014;57(15):6342–53.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Kang HJ, Yi YW, Hou SJ, Kim HJ, Kong Y, Bae I, et al. Disruption of STAT3-DNMT1 interaction by SH-I-14 induces re-expression of tumor suppressor genes and inhibits growth of triple-negative breast tumor. Oncotarget. 2017;8(48):83457–68.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  127. Lim EJ, Hong DY, Park JH, Joung YH, Darvin P, Kim SY, et al. Methylsulfonylmethane suppresses breast cancer growth by down-regulating STAT3 and STAT5b pathways. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33361.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Chen W, Wang H, Cheng M, Ni L, Zou L, Yang Q, et al. Isoharringtonine inhibits breast cancer stem-like properties and STAT3 signaling. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:435–42.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  129. Kang DY, Sp N, Kim DH, Joung YH, Lee HG, Park YM, et al. Salidroside inhibits migration, invasion and angiogenesis of MDAMB 231 TNBC cells by regulating EGFR/Jak2/STAT3 signaling via MMP2. Int J Oncol. 2018;53(2):877–85.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  130. Njatcha C, Farooqui M, Kornberg A, Johnson DE, Grandis JR, Siegfried JM. STAT3 cyclic Decoy demonstrates robust antitumor effects in non-small cell lung Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17(9):1917–26.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  131. Reilley MJ, McCoon P, Cook C, Lyne P, Kurzrock R, Kim Y, et al. STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide AZD9150 in a subset of patients with heavily pretreated lymphoma: results of a phase 1b trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):119.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Hong D, Kurzrock R, Kim Y, Woessner R, Younes A, Nemunaitis J, et al. AZD9150, a next-generation antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of STAT3 with early evidence of clinical activity in lymphoma and lung cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(314):314ra185.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Jung KH, Yoo W, Stevenson HL, Deshpande D, Shen H, Gagea M, et al. Multifunctional effects of a small-molecule STAT3 inhibitor on NASH and hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(18):5537–46.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Wong AL, Soo RA, Tan DS, Lee SC, Lim JS, Marban PC, et al. Phase I and biomarker study of OPB-51602, a novel signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid malignancies. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(5):998–1005.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  135. Jonker DJ, Nott L, Yoshino T, Gill S, Shapiro J, Ohtsu A, et al. Napabucasin versus placebo in refractory advanced colorectal cancer: a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(4):263–70.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  136. Oh DY, Lee SH, Han SW, Kim MJ, Kim TM, Kim TY, et al. Phase I study of OPB-31121, an Oral STAT3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(4):607–15.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Yoo C, Kang J, Lim HY, Kim JH, Lee MA, Lee KH, et al. Phase I dose-finding study of OPB-111077, a novel STAT3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(2):510–8.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  138. Khan MW, Saadalla A, Ewida AH, Al-Katranji K, Al-Saoudi G, Giaccone ZT, et al. The STAT3 inhibitor pyrimethamine displays anti-cancer and immune stimulatory effects in murine models of breast cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018;67(1):13–23.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  139. Wang ST, Ho HJ, Lin JT, Shieh JJ, Wu CY. Simvastatin-induced cell cycle arrest through inhibition of STAT3/SKP2 axis and activation of AMPK to promote p27 and p21 accumulation in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(2):e2626.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. A Study of DSP-0337 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors to Determine the Safety and the Pharmacokinetic Profile. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03416816. Accessed 26 Apr 2019.
  141. Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, Fruth B, Meyerhardt JA, et al. Effect of first-line chemotherapy combined with Cetuximab or bevacizumab on overall survival in patients with KRAS wild-type advanced or metastatic colorectal Cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(23):2392–401.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Medina PJ, Goodin S. Lapatinib: a dual inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. Clin Ther. 2008;30(8):1426–47.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  143. Song L, Morris M, Bagui T, Lee FY, Jove R, Haura EB. Dasatinib (BMS-354825) selectively induces apoptosis in lung cancer cells dependent on epidermal growth factor receptor signaling for survival. Cancer Res. 2006;66(11):5542–8.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  144. Chung SY, Chen YH, Lin PR, Chao TC, Su JC, Shiau CW, et al. Two novel SHP-1 agonists, SC-43 and SC-78, are more potent than regorafenib in suppressing the in vitro stemness of human colorectal cancer cells. Cell Death Discov. 2018;4:25.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  145. Bissonnette R, Maari C, Forman S, Bhatia N, Lee M, Fowler J, et al. The Oral JAK/SYK inhibitor ASN002 demonstrates efficacy and improves associated systemic inflammation in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Br J Dermatol. 2019.Google Scholar
  146. Zhang M, Xu CR, Shamiyeh E, Liu F, Yin JY, von Moltke LL, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled study of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of the oral JAK2 inhibitor fedratinib (SAR302503) in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(4):415–21.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  147. Hedvat M, Huszar D, Herrmann A, Gozgit JM, Schroeder A, Sheehy A, et al. The JAK2 inhibitor AZD1480 potently blocks Stat3 signaling and oncogenesis in solid tumors. Cancer Cell. 2009;16(6):487–97.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Verstovsek S, Manshouri T, Quintas-Cardama A, Harris D, Cortes J, Giles FJ, et al. WP1066, a novel JAK2 inhibitor, suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in erythroid human cells carrying the JAK2 V617F mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(3):788–96.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement