Skip to main content
Download PDF

Minichromosome maintenance 3 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma radioresistance by activating the NF-κB pathway

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research volume 38, Article number: 263 (2019) Cite this article

  • The Correction to this article has been published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2019 38:387
  • The Correction to this article has been published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2019 38:336

Abstract

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common tumors in the worldwide, it develops resistance to radiotherapy during treatment, understanding the regulatory mechanisms of radioresistance generation is the urgent need for HCC therapy.

Methods

qRT-PCR, western blot and immunohistochemistry were used to examine MCM3 expression. MTT assay, colony formation assay, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase nick end labeling assay and In vivo xenograft assay were used to determine the effect of MCM3 on radioresistance. Gene set enrichment analysis, luciferase reporter assay, western blot and qRT-PCR were used to examine the effect of MCM3 on NF-κB pathway.

Results

We found DNA replication initiation protein Minichromosome Maintenance 3 (MCM3) was upregulated in HCC tissues and cells, patients with high MCM3 expression had poor outcome, it was an independent prognostic factor for HCC. Cells with high MCM3 expression or MCM3 overexpression increased the radioresistance determined by MTT assay, colony formation assay, TUNEL assay and orthotopic transplantation mouse model, while cells with low MCM3 expression or MCM3 knockdown reduced the radioresistance. Mechanism analysis showed MCM3 activated NF-κB pathway, characterized by increasing the nuclear translocation of p65, the expression of the downstream genes NF-κB pathway and the phosphorylation of IKK-β and IκBα. Inhibition of NF-κB in MCM3 overexpressing cells using small molecular inhibitor reduced the radioresistance, suggesting MCM3 increased radioresistance through activating NF-κB pathway. Moreover, we found MCM3 expression positively correlated with NF-κB pathway in clinic.

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that MCM3 promoted radioresistance through activating NF-κB pathway, strengthening the role of MCM subunits in the tumor progression and providing a new target for HCC therapy.

Background

HCC is the fifth most common tumors worldwide [1]. Although the greatly improved in the last decades, its 5-year survival rate is only 15%, owing to the limitation of surgical intervention, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. It’s urgent need to identify potential biomarkers for prognosis and find new targets for designing more powerful therapeutic approach [2,3,4].

Eukaryotic DNA replication initiation includes helicase loading, helicase activation, replisome assembly and DNA synthesis, MCM2–7 complex assembled by six MCM subunits participates in all the events of DNA replication initiation [5,6,7,8]. Some subunits have been studied in HCC, for example, MCM7 is a poor prognostic factor for HCC and promotes HCC growth through activating MAPK signaling [9], MCM6 is a novel serum biomarker for early HCC and promotes HCC metastasis through activating MEK/ERK pathway [10]. MCM3 belongs to MCM2–7 complex, it is a poor prognosis marker for oral squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, osteosarcoma, glioma, keratocystic odontogenic tumor, anaplastic astrocytoma and salivary gland epithelial tumors [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. MCM3 is upregulated in prostate cancer tissues samples with bone metastasis, mouse model showed that MCM3 is increased in mesenchymal-derived tumors [21]. MCM3 also is upregulated in medulloblastoma and promotes cell migration and invasion [22]. But these studies only investigate whether MCM3 could be a prognostic factor for various tumors, its role in tumor progression couldn’t be well investigated. Especially, it’s role in radioresistance of HCC. In this study, we main studied the effect of MCM3 on radioresistance of HCC and its regulatory mechanism, we found MCM3 was an independent prognostic factor for HCC and promoted radiotherapy resistance through activating NF-κB pathway.

Materials and methods

Cell cultures

Immortalized normal liver cell LO2 and human HCC cell lines including SK-Hep1, SNU-475, HepG2, Huh7, Huh1, SNU-182 and Hep3B were purchased from the ATCC and cultured in DMEM high glucose (Hyclone) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), the cells were maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2 incubator.

Tissues samples and immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Eighteen fresh tissue specimens of HCC and three fresh tissue of non-tumor adjacent tissue, as well as 162 paraffin-embedded HCC specimens were utilized, the detailed information was shown in Additional file 1: Table S1 The criteria for determining patient recurrence is that tumors is found in the liver, lung, skeleton, lymph and other positions after complete healing. These samples were collected during surgical procedures from patients with HCC according to a protocol approved by the institutional review board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. All patients provided written, informed consent for participation in the study and provision of tumor samples. IHC was performed according to our previous methods [23, 24]. Anti-MCM3 antibody (ab4460, Abcam) was used. The images were captured using the AxioVision Rel.4.6 computerized image analysis system (Carl Zeiss Co Ltd., Jena, Germany).

Vectors, lentiviral infection and transfection

Human MCM3 cDNA was subcloned into the pSin-EF1α-puro lentiviral vector to generate pSin-EF1α-MCM3 vector (indicated as MCM3), the empty vector was used as the negative control (indicated as Vector). Two short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) oligonucleotides sequences against MCM3 was cloned into the PLKO.1 lentiviral vector to generate PLKO.1-MCM3 shRNAs (indicated as shRNA#1 and shRNA#2, respectively), The sequences of shRNAs were: shRNA#1, 5′ GCCACAGATGATCCCAACTTT3’ and shRNA#2, 5′ GCAGGATGACAATCAGGTCAT3’. the scramble shRNA sequence was cloned PLKO.1 vector and used as the negative control (indicated as Scramble). These vectors were cotransfected with pM2.G and psPAX2 into 293 T using Exfect Transfection Reagent (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The lentiviral supernatants were collected 48 h after transfection and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. Supernatants plus polybrene (Sigma) were infected with growing HCC cells, after 12 h the supernatants were replaced by fresh medium. Puromycin (Sigma) was used to screen stably cell lines.

Radiation treatment

HCC cells were irradiated by different radioactive rays Gy (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0) from 6Mv-X-ray produced by a linear accelerator (Varian 600, Varian Medical Systems). The following day after irradiation, cells were used as MTT assy. Cells treated with 2 Gy radioactive rays were used as colony formation assay and TUNEL assay.

Cell proliferation assay

MTT assay, colony formation assay and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay were performed according to our previous methods [25,26,27].

qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using RNA isolater Total RNA Extraction Reagent (Vazyme), and reversely transcribed into cDNA using HiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit with gDNA wiper (Vazyme). Relative gene expression levels were examined using AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme) on a CFX96 Touch Real-time PCR Detection system (Bio-Rad). GAPDH was used as the internal control.

Western blot

Total proteins were extracted using RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) supplemental with protease inhibitors (Roche). KeyGEN Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Protein Extraction Kit (KGP150, KeyGEN BioTECH) was used to isolate nuclear proteins. Antibodies against MCM3 (ab4460, Abcam), p65 (ab16502, Abcam), p84 (ab487, Abcam), IKKβ (ab124957, Abcam), p-IKKβ (ab38515, Abcam), IκBα (ab32518, Abcam), p-IκBα (ab133462, Abcam), DNA PKcs (ab32566), DNA PKcs (phosphor S2056) (ab18192), CLEAVED PARP1 (ab32064) and GAPDH (G8795, Sigma).

In vivo xenograft assay

All animal experiments were performed under the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Six weeks old BALB/c-nu mice were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of the Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine. 5◊106 HepG2 with MCM3 overexpression or knockdown were orthotopically injected into the liver parenchyma of mice (n = 6) to observe the tumor growth, tumor size was up to 7.0–8.0 mm, the mice were treated with 10Gy radioactive rays. The mice were continued to feed for 40 days, then were euthanized, tumors were excised.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 19.0 was used to perform all statistical analyses. All data from at least three independent experiments are presented as the mean ± s.d. Comparisons between different groups were analyzed using Student’s t-test, Survival curves were derived from Kaplan-Meier estimates, multivariate Cox-regression analysis was used to determine the prognostic value of MCM3 levels and other clinicopathologic characteristics. RNA-seq data from the TCGA HCC data set portal were used for the analyzing MCM3 expression, Salmon and DESeq2 were used to analyze MCM3 expression in HCC samples and normal liver samples. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed using GSEA 2.0.9 software http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

High MCM3 expression is associated with poor outcome for HCC patients

To determine the role of MCM3 in HCC progression, we determined MCM3 level in HCC tissues with relapse or without relapse using IHC and found MCM3 was upregulated in tissues with relapse compared to tissues without relapse (Fig. 1a). We performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine the relationship between MCM3 expression and the survival of patients, patients with high MCM3 expression had shorter survival time compared to patients with high MCM3 expression for relapse-free survival and overall survival (Fig. 1b). We also investigated whether MCM3 could serve as an independent prognostic factor, univariate analysis showed that clinical stage, relapse and MCM3 expression were associated with patients’ survival time. Multivariate analysis showed clinical stage, relapse and MCM3 expression also were independent prognostic factors for patients’ survival time (Fig. 1c). These results showed that MCM3 was a poor prognostic factor for HCC patients.

Fig. 1
figure1

MCM3 is an independent prognostic factor for HCC. a IHC images indicated MCM3 expression in relapse-free HCC tissues and relapse HCC tissues. b Kaplan-Meier analysis of relapse-free and overall survival curves of patients with high MCM3 expression versus low MCM3 expression. c Multivariate Cox regression analysis to investigate the importance of MCM3 in clinical prognosis

Full size image

MCM3 is upregulated in HCC cells and tissues

Next, we determined MCM3 expression in HCC cells and tissues. Q-PCR and western blot analysis showed MCM3 was upregulated HCC tissues compared to normal liver tissues (Fig. 2a). We also downloaded gene expression profiles for HCC from TCGA dataset, MCM3 was significantly upregulated in HCC tissues compared to normal liver tissues (Fig. 2b). Q-PCR and western blot showed MCM3 was also upregulated in HCC cells compared to normal liver cell LO2 (Fig. 2c). These results showed that MCM3 was upregulated in HCC cells and tissues, suggesting MCM3 might promote HCC progression.

Fig. 2
figure2

MCM3 is elevated in HCC tissues and cells. a qRT-PCR and western blot investigated MCM3 expression in HCC tissues and normal liver tissues. GAPDH served as an internal control. b Analysis of MCM3 expression in TCGA tissues. c qRT-PCR and western blot investigated MCM3 expression in HCC cells and immortalized normal liver cell LO2. GAPDH served as an internal control

Full size image

MCM3 is associated with poor radiotherapy effect in vivo and in vitro

Radiotherapy is one of the most common methods for tumor therapy, but the radioresistance is often generated after several course of treatments [28]. Some poor prognosis factors always associates with radioresistance generation, such as SRSF1 [29, 30], RPA3 [31], FOXM1 [32] and RNF6 [33], so we determined whether MCM3 regulates radioresistance. MTT analysis showed HCC cells with low MCM3 expression had low proliferation rate after radiotherapy (Fig. 3a), suggesting MCM3 might promote radioresistance. Colony formation assay showed that radiotherapy inhibit HCC cell proliferation, but the inhibition effect was better in SK-Hep1, SNU-185 and SNU-475 cells with low MCM3 expression than in Hep3B, Huh1 and Huh7 cells with high MCM expression. TUNEL assay showed that radiotherapy induced apoptosis, the induced effect was reduced in cells with high MCM3 expression, suggesting MCM3 inhibited the radiotherapy effect (Fig. 3b and c).

Fig. 3
figure3

High MCM3 expression is associated with increased radiotherapy resistance. a MTT assay of the proliferation of HCC cell treated with different dose of radiotherapy, cells with low MCM3 expression and high MCM3 expression, respectively. b Colony formation of the radiotherapy effect of HCC cells with high and low MCM3 expression. c TUNEL assay of the radiotherapy effect of HCC cells with high and low MCM3 expression.100 μM, every experiment was independently replicated in three times. Error bars

Full size image

To confirm above results, we overexpressed and knocked down MCM3 in Huh-1 and HepG2 cells, MTT assay showed that after radioresistance, the proliferation rate of cells with MCM3 overexpression was higher than control group, suggesting MCM3 overexpression increased the radioresistance, while the proliferation rate of MCM3 knockdown inhibited radioresistance (Fig. 4a). Colony formation assay showed MCM3 overexpressed inhibited radiotherapy effect, while MCM3 knockdown inhibited radioresistance. TUNEL assay showed the induced apoptosis effect was increased in cells with MCM3 knockdown compared to cells with MCM3 overexpression (Fig. 4b and c). These results suggested that MCM3 promoted radioresistance.

Fig. 4
figure4

MCM3 overexpression is associated with increased radiotherapy resistance. a MTT assay of the proliferation of MCM3 overexpressed or knocked down HCC cell treated with different dose of radiotherapy. b Colony formation of the radiotherapy effect of MCM3 overexpressed or knocked down HCC cells. c TUNEL assay of the radiotherapy effect of MCM3 overexpressed or knocked down HCC cells. 100 μM, every experiment was independently replicated in three times. Error bars

Full size image

To further confirm above findings, an in vivo model was used. MCM3 knockdown and Scramble control infected HepG2 cells with luciferase expression were injected into orthotopically injected into the liver parenchyma of nude mice, respectively. When the tumor size was up to 7.0–8.0 mm, the mice were treated with 10Gy radioactive rays. Bioluminescent images analysis showed MCM3 knockdown inhibited radioresistance, tumors were larger in Scramble groups than in MCM3 knockdown groups (Fig. 5a). Survival analysis showed mice with MCM3 knockdown had longer survival time compared to Scramble control group (Fig. 5b), suggesting MCM3 knockdown reduced radioresistance. DNA-PKcs activation is critical for development of tumor therapy resistance [34, 35], cleaved PARP1 is a marker for apoptosis [36], we isolated tumors from mice, western blot assay showed that MCM3 knockdown inhibited the phosphorylation of DNA-PKcs, and increased PARP1 cleavage (Fig. 5c), suggesting MCM3 knockdown reduced radioresistance. Together, these findings suggested that MCM3 reduced radiotherapy effect, promoted proliferation and growth, and increased anti-apoptosis ability of HCC.

Fig. 5
figure5

MCM3 increased radiotherapy resistance of HCC in vivo. a Xenograft model in nude mice treated with radiotherapy, Representative bioluminescent images of xenograft tumors formed by HepG2 cells with Scramble control and MCM3 shRNA#1, respectively (Left). and representative images of tumors in the indicated group in nude mice (Right). b Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival curves of mice with high MCM3 knockdown versus Scramble control. c Western blot analyzed DNA-PKcs, Pdna-PKcsT2609 and Cleaved PARP1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. Error bars, SD. *P < 0.05

Full size image

MCM3 promoted HCC radioresistance through activating NF-κB pathway

To investigate the regulatory mechanism of MCM3 in HCC progression, we used GSEA to explore the relationship between MCM3 expression and NF-κB regulated gene signatures from the TCGA dataset, and found MCM3 was positively associated with NF-κB pathway (Fig. 6a), Luciferase assay showed the activity of the NF-κB luciferase reporter gene was significantly increased in cells overexpressing MCM3, the luciferase activity was significantly reduced in cells knocking down MCM3, suggesting MCM3 activated NF-κB pathway (Fig. 6b). The translocation of p65 into nuclear, the phosphorylation of IKK-β and IκBα is the markers of NF-κB pathway activation, western blot analysis showed that MCM3 overexpression increased the translocation of p65 to nuclear, and the phosphorylation of IKK-β and IκBα, while MCM3 knockdown inhibited the translocation of p65 to nuclear, and the phosphorylation of IKK-β and IκBα (Fig. 6c). We also analyzed the effect of MCM3 on the expression of NF-κB downstream genes [37], and found MCM3 overexpression promoted their expression, while MCM3 knockdown inhibited their expression (Fig. 6d), confirming MCM3 activated NF-κB pathway. Further confirming MCM3 activated NF-κB pathway.

Fig. 6
figure6

MCM3 increased radiotherapy resistance through activating NF-κB pathway. a GSEA revealed MCM3 expression significantly and positively correlated with TNFα induced NF-κB pathway and the upregulated target genes of NF-κB pathway. b Luciferase reporter assay of the effect of MCM3 overexpression or knockdown on NF-κB pathway activity. c Western blot analysis of p65 expression in the nuclear and cytoplasm, IKKβ and IκBα, and the phosphorylation of IKKβ and IκBα, p84 served as an internal control for nuclear proteins, GAPDH served as an internal control for total proteins. d qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of downstream genes of NF-κB pathway. e Colony formation analysis of the effect of inhibition of NF-κB pathway in MCM3 overexpression cells on radiotherapy resistance. g TUNEL analysis of the effect of inhibition of NF-κB pathway in MCM3 overexpression cells on radiotherapy resistance. Error bars, SD. *P < 0.05

Full size image

To confirm whether MCM3 promoted radioresistance through activating NF-κB pathway, we inhibited NF-κB pathway in MCM3 overexpressing cells through adding NF-κB pathway inhibitor JSH-23 (10um) or overexpressing mutated IκBα, colony formation assay and TUNEL assay showed that inhibition of NF-κB pathway in MCM3 overexpressing cells significantly reduced radioresistance, characterized by inhibiting of cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis (Fig. 6e and f). These findings suggested MCM3 promoted HCC radioresistance through activating NF-κB pathway. We further investigated the correlation of MCM3 expression and NF-κB pathway activation in the clinic, MCM3 expression correlated with the mRNA levels of NF-κB pathway downstream genes including Bcl-xL, CCND1 and VEGF-C, and the translocation of p65 into nuclear (Fig. 7), confirming MCM3 expression related to NF-κB pathway activation in human HCC samples.

Fig. 7
figure7

qRT-PCR analysis of CCND1, Bcl-XL and VEGF-C expression in 10 freshly collected HCC samples, western blot analysis of nuclear p65 and MCM3 expression in the same samples (Left). The correlation of nuclear p65 and MCM3 expression was showed in Right. Error bars, SD

Full size image

Discussion

In present study, we found MCM3 was upregulated in HCC tissues and cells, it’s an independent prognostic factor for HCC. MCM3 overexpression increased the radioresistance, while MCM3 knockdown inhibited the radioresistance. Mechanism analysis suggested that MCM3 promoted HCC progression through activating NF-κB pathway.

We found MCM3 overexpression increased the radioresistance, previous studies show cancer stem cells are the main reason for tumor relapse, metastasis, radiotherapy and chemotherapy resistance generation [38], Many cancer types have been reported to exist cancer stem cells, including HCC, EpCAM, CD13, CD133, CD90, CD24 and CD44 have used for the markers for HCC stem cells [39, 40]. We found MCM3 increased the radioresistance of HCC, suggesting MCM3 might promote the expansion of HCC stem cells, but this inference needed to be verified by further experiments.

NF-κB pathway regulates hepatic fibrosis and HCC [41, 42], In unstimulated cells, IκB interacts with NF-κB, leading the NF-κB/IκB complex sequesters in the cytoplasm, and prevents NF-κB from binding to DNA. Extracellular stimuli activate NF-κB signaling, these stimuli are recognized by receptors and transmitted into the cell, where adaptor signaling proteins initiate a signaling cascade. These signaling cascades activate IKK, IKK phosphorylates IκB in the cytoplasm, leading the degradation of IκB by the proteasome and releases NF-κB from the inhibitory complex. Then NF-κB proteins trans-locates into nucleus where they bind to their target sequences and activate gene transcription [43]. We found MCM3 increased the nuclear translocation of p65 and the phosphorylation of IKK-β and IκBα, suggesting MCM3 activated NF-κB pathway. We also inhibited NF-κB pathway in MCM3 overexpressing cells, and found the radiotherapy resistance was reduced, suggesting MCM3 increased radioresistance through activating NF-κB pathway.

Although other subunits of MCM2–7 complex have been studied in tumors, such as MCM6 and MCM7, previous reporters only show MCM3 is a prognostic factor for various tumors, its function in tumor progression is reported rarely, especially in radioresistance generation, we first systematically studied the role of MCM3 in HCC radioresistance and the regulatory mechanisms. In summary, we found MCM3 increased the radiotherapy resistance of HCC through activating NF-κB pathway.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates the role of MCM3 in HCC patients’ prognosis and radioresistance, we found MCM3 was an independent prognosis factor for HCC, it promoted radioresistance of HCC through activating NF-κB pathway. Thus, MCM3 could serve as a potential biomarker for HCC prognosis and a new target for HCC therapy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included and indicated within the article.

Change history

  • 05 September 2019

    In the original publication of this article [1], the Fig. 7 is wrong, but does not affect discussions and conclusions drawn in the article.

  • 02 August 2019

    In the original publication of this article [1], the authors reported the order of the authors was incorrect and needs to be revised. The original article has been updated to rectify this error.

Abbreviations

GSEA:

Gene set enrichment analysis

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

MCM3:

Minichromosome Maintenance 3

References

  1. 1.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yamashita T, Wang XW. Cancer stem cells in the development of liver cancer. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(5):1911–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lachenmayer A, Alsinet C, Savic R, Cabellos L, Toffanin S, Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, Minguez B, Newell P, Tsai HW, et al. Wnt-pathway activation in two molecular classes of hepatocellular carcinoma and experimental modulation by sorafenib. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(18):4997–5007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Galuppo R, McCall A, Gedaly R. The role of bridging therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Hepatol. 2013;2013:419302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kang S, Warner MD, Bell SP. Multiple functions for Mcm2-7 ATPase motifs during replication initiation. Mol Cell. 2014;55(5):655–65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Samel SA, Fernandez-Cid A, Sun J, Riera A, Tognetti S, Herrera MC, Li H, Speck C. A unique DNA entry gate serves for regulated loading of the eukaryotic replicative helicase MCM2-7 onto DNA. Genes Dev. 2014;28(15):1653–66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fragkos M, Ganier O, Coulombe P, Mechali M. DNA replication origin activation in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16(6):360–74.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yu Z, Feng D, Liang C. Pairwise interactions of the six human MCM protein subunits. J Mol Biol. 2004;340(5):1197–206.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Qu K, Wang Z, Fan H, Li J, Liu J, Li P, Liang Z, An H, Jiang Y, Lin Q, et al. MCM7 promotes cancer progression through cyclin D1-dependent signaling and serves as a prognostic marker for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(2):e2603.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Liu M, Hu Q, Tu M, Wang X, Yang Z, Yang G, Luo R. MCM6 promotes metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma via MEK/ERK pathway and serves as a novel serum biomarker for early recurrence. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Valverde LF, de Freitas RD, Pereira TA, de Resende MF, Agra IMG, Dos Santos JN, Dos Reis MG, Sales CBS, Gurgel Rocha CA. MCM3: a novel proliferation marker in Oral squamous cell carcinoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2018;26(2):120–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zielinski R, Kobos J, Zakrzewska A. Comparison between immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67 and MCM-3 in major salivary gland epithelial tumors in children and adolescents. Preliminary study. Pol J Pathol. 2016;67(4):351–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ashkavandi ZJ, Najvani AD, Tadbir AA, Pardis S, Ranjbar MA, Ashraf MJ. MCM3 as a novel diagnostic marker in benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(6):3479–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nodin B, Fridberg M, Jonsson L, Bergman J, Uhlen M, Jirstrom K. High MCM3 expression is an independent biomarker of poor prognosis and correlates with reduced RBM3 expression in a prospective cohort of malignant melanoma. Diagn Pathol. 2012;7:82.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lee YS, Ha SA, Kim HJ, Shin SM, Kim HK, Kim S, Kang CS, Lee KY, Hong OK, Lee SH, et al. Minichromosome maintenance protein 3 is a candidate proliferation marker in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Exp Mol Pathol. 2010;88(1):138–42.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jankowska-Konsur A, Kobierzycki C, Reich A, Grzegrzolka J, Maj J, Dziegiel P. Expression of MCM-3 and MCM-7 in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(11):6017–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cheng DD, Zhang HZ, Yuan JQ, Li SJ, Yang QC, Fan CY. Minichromosome maintenance protein 2 and 3 promote osteosarcoma progression via DHX9 and predict poor patient prognosis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(16):26380–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hua C, Zhao G, Li Y, Bie L. Minichromosome maintenance (MCM) family as potential diagnostic and prognostic tumor markers for human gliomas. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:526.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cosarca AS, Mocan SL, Pacurar M, Fulop E, Ormenisan A. The evaluation of Ki67, p53, MCM3 and PCNA immunoexpressions at the level of the dental follicle of impacted teeth, dentigerous cysts and keratocystic odontogenic tumors. Romanian J Morphol Embryol. 2016;57(2):407–12.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Soling A, Sackewitz M, Volkmar M, Schaarschmidt D, Jacob R, Holzhausen HJ, Rainov NG. Minichromosome maintenance protein 3 elicits a cancer-restricted immune response in patients with brain malignancies and is a strong independent predictor of survival in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(1):249–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Stewart PA, Khamis ZI, Zhau HE, Duan P, Li Q, Chung LWK, Sang QA. Upregulation of minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(24):39209–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lau KM, Chan QK, Pang JC, Li KK, Yeung WW, Chung NY, Lui PC, Tam YS, Li HM, Zhou L, et al. Minichromosome maintenance proteins 2, 3 and 7 in medulloblastoma: overexpression and involvement in regulation of cell migration and invasion. Oncogene. 2010;29(40):5475–89.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tang H, Wang Y, Zhang B, Xiong S, Liu L, Chen W, Tan G, Li H. High brain acid soluble protein 1(BASP1) is a poor prognostic factor for cervical cancer and promotes tumor growth. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17:97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Guo BH, Feng Y, Zhang R, Xu LH, Li MZ, Kung HF, Song LB, Zeng MS. Bmi-1 promotes invasion and metastasis, and its elevated expression is correlated with an advanced stage of breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2011;10(1):10.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fu B, Meng W, Zhao H, Zhang B, Tang H, Zou Y, Yao J, Li H, Zhang T. GRAM domain-containing protein 1A (GRAMD1A) promotes the expansion of hepatocellular carcinoma stem cell and hepatocellular carcinoma growth through STAT5. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31963.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Xie B, Zen Q, Wang X, He X, Xie Y, Zhang Z, Li H. ACK1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via downregulating WWOX and activating AKT signaling. Int J Oncol. 2015;46(5):2057–66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Li H, Zheng D, Zhang B, Liu L, Ou J, Chen W, Xiong S, Gu Y, Yang J. Mir-208 promotes cell proliferation by repressing SOX6 expression in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2014;12:196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chino F, Stephens SJ, Choi SS, Marin D, Kim CY, Morse MA, Godfrey DJ, Czito BG, Willett CG, Palta M. The role of external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer. Cancer. 2018;124(17):3476–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sheng J, Zhao Q, Zhao J, Zhang W, Sun Y, Qin P, Lv Y, Bai L, Yang Q, Chen L, et al. SRSF1 modulates PTPMT1 alternative splicing to regulate lung cancer cell radioresistance. EBioMedicine. 2018;38:113–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zhou X, Wang R, Li X, Yu L, Hua D, Sun C, Shi C, Luo W, Rao C, Jiang Z, et al. Splicing factor SRSF1 promotes gliomagenesis via oncogenic splice-switching of MYO1B. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(2):676–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Qu C, Zhao Y, Feng G, Chen C, Tao Y, Zhou S, Liu S, Chang H, Zeng M, Xia Y. RPA3 is a potential marker of prognosis and radioresistance for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(11):2872–83.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lee Y, Kim KH, Kim DG, Cho HJ, Kim Y, Rheey J, Shin K, Seo YJ, Choi YS, Lee JI, et al. FoxM1 promotes Stemness and radio-resistance of glioblastoma by regulating the master stem cell regulator Sox2. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0137703.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cai J, Xiong Q, Jiang X, Zhou S, Liu T. RNF6 facilitates metastasis and radioresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma through ubiquitination of FoxA1. Exp Cell Res. 2019;374(1):152–61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lan T, Zhao Z, Qu Y, Zhang M, Wang H, Zhang Z, Zhou W, Fan X, Yu C, Zhan Q, et al. Targeting hyperactivated DNA-PKcs by KU0060648 inhibits glioma progression and enhances temozolomide therapy via suppression of AKT signaling. Oncotarget. 2016;7(34):55555–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Blackford AN, Jackson SP. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: the trinity at the heart of the DNA damage response. Mol Cell. 2017;66(6):801–17.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kantidze OL, Velichko AK, Luzhin AV, Petrova NV, Razin SV. Synthetically lethal interactions of ATM, ATR, and DNA-PKcs. Trends Cancer. 2018;4(11):755–68.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Maubach G, Feige MH, Lim MCC, Naumann M. NF-kappaB-inducing kinase in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2018;1871(1):40–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhao Z, Li S, Song E, Liu S. The roles of ncRNAs and histone-modifiers in regulating breast cancer stem cells. Protein Cell. 2016;7(2):89–99.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yang ZF, Ho DW, Ng MN, Lau CK, Yu WC, Ngai P, Chu PW, Lam CT, Poon RT, Fan ST. Significance of CD90+ cancer stem cells in human liver cancer. Cancer Cell. 2008;13(2):153–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chen CL, Uthaya Kumar DB, Punj V, Xu J, Sher L, Tahara SM, Hess S, Machida K. NANOG metabolically reprograms tumor-initiating stem-like cells through tumorigenic changes in oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016;23(1):206–19.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kang HJ, Chung DH, Sung CO, Yoo SH, Yu E, Kim N, Lee SH, Song JY, Kim CJ, Choi J. SHP2 is induced by the HBx-NF-kappaB pathway and contributes to fibrosis during human early hepatocellular carcinoma development. Oncotarget. 2017;8(16):27263–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tey SK, Tse EYT, Mao X, Ko FCF, Wong AST, Lo RC, Ng IO, Yam JWP. Nuclear met promotes hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis and metastasis by upregulation of TAK1 and activation of NF-kappaB pathway. Cancer Lett. 2017;411:150–61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Napetschnig J, Wu H. Molecular basis of NF-kappaB signaling. Annu Rev Biophys. 2013;42:443–68.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81602701, 81760496),the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2016A030313195, 2014A030313131, 2017A030313547 and 2018A030313176), the Key Scientific and Technological Projects of Guangdong Province (No. 2014B020228003, 2014B030301041, 2015A070710006 and 2016A020215053), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou (No. 201400000001–3, 158100076), Medical Science and Technology Research Fund of Guangdong Province (No. A2017366) and the Science and Technology Projects Foundation of Guangzhou City (No. 201507020037 and 201607010260).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Qing Yang, Binhui Xie and Hui Tang contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver transplantation Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital, Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, 600# Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, China

    Qing Yang, Hui Tang, Wei Meng, Yi Zhang, Jianwen Zhang & Binsheng Fu

  2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, 341000, China

    Binhui Xie

  3. Cell-gene Therapy Translational Medicine Research Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China

    Changchang Jia

  4. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China

    Xiaomei Zhang

  5. Department of Medical Oncology of the Eastern Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Heping Li

Authors
  1. Qing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Binhui Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hui Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Changchang Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaomei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jianwen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Heping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Binsheng Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JWZ, HPL and BSF: conceived the study, conducted experiments, acquired and analysed data, and wrote the manuscript; QY, BHX, QY, HT, WM, CCJ and XMZ: provided suggestions and participated in data analysis; WM, XMZ and YZ: contributed to the collection of the tissue specimens; QY, BHX, QY, HT, WM,  CCJ and XMZ: contributed to data analysis; JWZ, HPL and BSF: responsible for conception and supervision of the study, and wrote the manuscript. All authors corrected draft versions and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianwen Zhang or Heping Li or Binsheng Fu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, which is accredited by the National Council on Ethics in Human Research.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to publish this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: “The author sequence is revised.”

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Clinicopathological characteristics of HCC patient samples. (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Q., Xie, B., Tang, H. et al. Minichromosome maintenance 3 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma radioresistance by activating the NF-κB pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38, 263 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1241-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • MCM3
  • HCC
  • Radiotherapy resistance
  • NF-κB pathway

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research

ISSN: 1756-9966

Contact us