Open Access

The immunoregulatory mechanisms of carcinoma for its survival and development

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201130:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-30-12

Received: 15 November 2010

Accepted: 21 January 2011

Published: 21 January 2011

Abstract

The immune system in patients detects and eliminates tumor cells, but tumors still progress persistently. The mechanisms by which tumor cells survive under the pressure of immune surveillance are not fully understood. This review is to present the evidence from clinical studies, showing a significant correlation of clinicopathological features of carcinoma with: (1) the loss of classical human leukocyte antigen class I, (2) the up-regulation of non-classical human leukocyte antigen class I, pro-apoptotic Fas ligand and receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells I, and (3) the formation of immunosuppressive microenvironment by up-regulation of transforming growth factor-beta, Galectin-1, inhibitory ligand B7s, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and arginase, as well as by recruitment of tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells. All of these factors may together protect carcinoma cells from the immune-cytotoxicity.

Introduction

Carcinoma is the most commonly type of cancer transformed from epithelial cells. It has been noted for a while that the immune-mediated spontaneous regression of cancer occurs in patients [1]. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that anti-carcinoma immunity is activated along with rise and progression of carcinoma, indicated by: (1) the tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TICs), including T, B and natural killer (NK) cells, are activated [24], and the number of these lymphocytes and macrophages positively correlates with cancer-specific survival rate in patients with various carcinomas [57]; (2) both carcinoma antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) [810] and antibodies [1113] have been identified in cancer patients; and (3) spontaneous regression has been noted in many patients with carcinoma cancers, in which the number of infiltrating immune cells, including activated CD3+ T cells, NK cells, antigen presenting cells (APCs), is significantly higher than that in non-regressing controls [1416]. Therefore, the number of infiltrating immune cells becomes a reliable biomarker for predicting cancer relapse [17, 18]. All these studies suggest that the immune surveillance against carcinoma is active in patients, but how carcinoma cells still can survive and grow in some patients is not fully understood. In this review, we attempted to summarize the evidence of anti-immune functions of carcinoma from both clinical and experimental studies.

Avoidance of cytotoxic lymphocyte stimulation by attenuation of human leukocyte antigen class (HLA) molecules

Loss of HLA class I for avoidance of CD8+ CTL activation

Classical HLA class I constitutively expresses on epithelial cells and many carcinoma cell lines, such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [19]. Given a central role of HLA class I in the restriction of CD8+ CTL recognition of carcinoma-specific antigens, loss of HLA class I expression undoubtedly becomes a major escape pathway for the evasion of CD8+ CTL surveillance, by which any HLA class I deficient carcinoma variants can develop to more aggressive or invasive phenotypes without stimulation of primary anti-carcinoma immunity, CD8+ T cell response. Indeed, as listed in Table 1, the total loss of HLA class I expression is more frequently noted with more aggressive or metastatic stages and poor differentiation phenotypes as compared to those with early stages and well to moderately differentiated lesions in patients.
Table 1

The association of deficient HLA class I expression in carcinoma with its progression in patients

Carcinoma type

Antibodies for immunohistochemical staining

Distribution of total HLA class I expression loss (% of negative staining*)

References

Bladder

W6/32 and GRH1

The altered of HLA class I including total losses associates with higher grade lesions and tumor recurrence

[20]

 

A-072

1) 16.6% in G1, 38.5% in G2, and 57.1% in G3;

2) 5-year survival: 74% with positive versus 36% with negative staining

[21]

Gastric

A-072

0% in T1 (mucosa & submucosa) versus100% in T2-3 (muscle and fat invasion)

[22]

Esophageal

W6/32

0%: normal and benign versus 40.5% carcinoma lesions

[23]

Bronchogenic

W6/32 and HC-10

1) 13% of Diploid versus 45% of Aneuploid;

2) 17.3% in G1-2 versus 69% in G3

[24]

NSCLC

W6/32

1) 26.8% in T1-2 versus 35% in T3;

2) 20.7% in G1-2 versus 39.3% in G3; 3) 24.1% in N0 versus 34.5% in N1-2

[25]

Breast

HC-10

0% in low-grade versus 67.6% in high-grade lesions

[26]

 

W6/32

24% in primary versus 64% in corresponding LN samples

[27]

Pancreatic

W6/32 and 246-E8.E7

1) 6% in primary versus 43% in metastastic tumors;

2) 0% in G1, 33% in G2 and 67% in G3

[28]

Prostate

A-072

1) 0% in Benign, 41% in primary and 66% in LN metastases;

2) 33% in low-grade versus 50% in high grade lesions

[29]

*The cutoff line for negative staining or total loss is 5 to 25% of cells stained with antibodies. W6/32 monoclonal antibody (mAb) detects monomorphic epitope of HLA class I antigen (HLA-ABC); 246-E8.E7, HC-10 and GRH1 are anti-beta2-microglobulin (β2-m) mAbs; rA-270 is rabbit polyclonal anti-β2-m antibody (DAKO).

A higher level of HLA class I expression in bladder carcinoma is significantly associated with a longer survival rate in patients [21], and tumors with a normal level of HLA class I harbor more CD8+ T cells than those with altered HLA class I in renal cell carcinomas (RCC) [30] and cervical carcinoma [31, 32]. In addition, a decrease in HLA class I expression has been noted as early as in normal mucosa surrounding the tumor or in situ lesion, and is significantly associated with subsequent development to a new primary tumor lesion [33, 34]. These data indicate that the avoidance strategy may occur at early stages of carcinoma development, and suggest that by loss of HLA class I expression to avoid CD8+ CTL seems critical for the development of carcinoma in patients.

Heterogeneous expression of HLA class I in inactivation of NK cell cytotoxicity

Although loss of HLA class I may benefit to carcinoma resistance to CD8+ CTL as discussed above, it could increase the susceptibility to cytotoxicity of natural killer (NK) cells [35] because HLA class I is a ligand for inhibitory receptor family, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) of NK cells [36], Thus, loss of HLA class I expression could favor the escape of antigen-dependent cytotoxicity of CD8+ CTL, but at the same time carcinoma cells may become a target of NK cell cytotoxicity. To date, it is not completely clear how carcinoma cells can survive under the selection of both CD8+ CTLs and NK cells simultaneously. It has been suggested that carcinoma cells find a balance between maintenance of HLA class I expression for inhibition of NK cell cytotoxicity and loss of its expression for the escape from CD8+ CTL responses. Indeed, the complete loss of HLA class I is barely seen in carcinomas, which may be explained by its need for inhibition of NK cell activity. The heterogeneous losses of HLA class I either positively or negatively correlate with carcinoma stages or grades in patients [24, 27, 28], reflecting exactly the situation of carcinoma cells; if carcinoma cancer faces more severe cytotoxicity from NK cells versus CD8+ CTL, certain levels of HLA class I render carcinomas resistance to NK cells; if tumor is under the pressure of CD8+ CTL more than NK cells, then partial loss of HLA class I becomes a key for survival, as indicated by Table 1.

In addition to heterogeneous expression of HLA class I, one has to knowledge that other strategies are seen to avoid NK cell cytotoxicity. A clinical study with oral squamous cell carcinomas shows that HLA class I expression is either weak or absent for not stimulation of CD8+ CTL, but there is still no a clear correlation of HLA class I expression loss with a relative proportion of NK cells, indicating that the local factors seem to down-regulate the final outcome of the cytotoxic immune response of NK cells [33]. Indeed, reduced expression of natural cytotoxicity receptor, NKG2D ligand UL16 binding protein 1 and Inter-Cellular Adhesion Molecule 1 has been seen on tumor cells [37, 38], which may specifically prevent NK cell activation.

Non-classical HLA-G in inhibition of both CD8+ CTLs and NK cells

HLA-G is a non-classical class I antigen, originally detected in trophoblastic cells [39], where it is proposed to suppress maternal immune response against the semi-allogeneic fetus. It binds to the inhibitory receptors Ig-like transcript (ILT) 2, ILT4 or KIR2DL4, resulting in suppression of cytotoxicity of both CD8+ CTL and NK cells [40, 41]. The protective role of HLA-G in carcinoma survival under immune surveillance is demonstrated in many studies with patients; in contrast to its null expression in normal epithelial cells and benign adenomas, a high percentage (30-90%) of carcinoma cells expresses HLA-G in a variety of cancerous lesions, and its levels have been found to be significantly associated with clinicopathological features and shorter survival time of patients [4245]. All these data indicate that carcinoma-expressing HLA-G could be one of important mechanisms for inhibition of both CD8+CTL and NK cell mediated anti-carcinoma immunity.

Induction of TIC apoptosis by expression of pro-apoptotic ligands

Fas ligand (FasL)

FasL binding to death receptor Fas triggers apoptosis of Fas-expressing cells including TICs. Two patterns of FasL expression on carcinoma cells have been shown by immunohistochemical staining: (1) up-regulation of FasL expression on carcinoma is positively associated with clinicopathological features in patients, shown by that FasL expression is an early event in epithelial cell transformation (adenoma), followed by an increase in the percentage of FasL-expressing carcinoma cells in high-stage or -grade lesions, and the poorer survival of patients with high levels of FasL expression (Table 2); and (2) high levels of FasL expression have been seen as an independent factor for clinicopathological features, indicated by the positive staining of persistent FasL expression regardless of tumor stage, histologic grade, invasion and metastasis in many studies [47, 5861]. All of these observations suggest that FasL expression is critical for carcinoma survival by induction of TIC apoptosis. Indeed, the pro-apoptotic function of FasL on carcinoma cells has been demonstrated in both in vitro and in vivo; in co-cultures with a variety of carcinoma cell lines, FasL expressed on carcinoma cells induce apoptosis of lymphocytes in Fas-dependent manner [49, 51, 6266], and in carcinoma biopsies from patients, the present of FasL on carcinoma cells is in parallel with apoptosis of TICs [53, 60, 6769] or reduced number of TICs [70, 71]. In the experimental studies with animal models, down-regulation of FasL expression in carcinoma significantly reduces tumor development in syngeneic immunocompetent mice [72], while persistent expression of Fas enhances tumor growth along with an increase in lymphocyte apoptosis [73, 74], and is acquired for survival from active specific immunotherapy [75].
Table 2

FasL expression in carcinoma cancers

Carcinoma type

Distribution of high FasL expression

References

Colorectal

19% in adenomas, 40% of stage I-II, 67% of stage III and 70% of stage IV of carcinoma

[46]

 

40.9% in adenoma versus 80.8% in carcinoma

[47]

 

Higher incidence of metastases and poorer patients' survival associate with FasL positive carcinomas

[48]

 

0 positive in normal epithelial cells, 2/7 positive in primary tumors, 4/4 positive in hepatic metastatic tumors

[49]

Adrenocortical

37.7% in adenomas versus 100% in the carcinoma

[50]

Bladder transitional cell

1) 0% in normal urothelium, 0% in G1, 14% in G2, and 75% in G3.

2) 13% in superficial Ta-T1 versus 81% in invasive T2-T4

[51]

 

0% in normal urothelium, 19% in T1, 21% in T2 and 49% in T3

[52]

Pancreatic ductal

1) 82% in primary versus 100% in hepatic metastases

2) Shorter survival for patients associates with FasL positive tumors

[53]

Nasopharyngeal

1) 0% in stage I, 57% in stage II, 58% in stage III and 82% in stage IV;

2) A lower rate of disease-free and overall survival for patients associates with positive FasL expression.

[54]

Gastric

36.2% in adenomas, 68.8% in early carcinoma, and 70.4% in advanced carcinoma

[55]

Cervical

1) 5/14 in inner 2/3 stromal invasion versus 10/10 outer 2/3 stromal invasion;

2) 7/15 without LN metastasis versus 8/9 with LN metastasis;

3) Reduced survival times in patients with FasL-expressing tumors

[56]

Esophageal

1) Higher incidence of LN metastasis associates with the tumors containing >25% FasL expression;

2) All cancer metastases in LN express FasL in >50% of the cells

[57]

LN: lymph nodes

Receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells (RCAS) 1

RCAS1 is a recently characterized human tumor-associated antigen expressed in a wide variety of cancer tissues, and induces cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis in RCAS1 receptor-expressing immune cells. Like FasL on carcinoma cells, RCAS1 is expressed in a high percentage of carcinoma cells (30-100%) and is significantly correlated with clinicopathological features including a shorter survival time for patients, and with apoptosis or reduction of TICs [7681]. In co-cultures of interleukin (IL)-2 activated peripheral blood lymphocytes with human oral squamous cell carcinomas cell line (KB cells), lymphocyte apoptosis is associated with the presence of soluble RCAS1 in the medium [77]. In addition, similar to FasL and RCAS1, CD70 overexpressed on RCC promotes lymphocyte apoptosis by binding to its receptor CD27, indicating a proapoptotic role of CD70 in the elimination of TICs as well [82]. All these observations suggest that the direct induction of TIC apoptosis by persistent expression of FasL, RCAS1 or perhaps other apoptosis-inducing ligands (e.g. CD70) on carcinoma cells plays a role in the ability of carcinoma cells to escape from the anti-carcinoma immunity.

Suppression of TIC activity by molecular and cellular factors

Immunoregulatory cytokine/cytokine-like: Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and Galectin-1 (Gal-1)

TGF-β1 is a multifunctional cytokine involved in immunosuppression. Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated that a higher level of TGF-β1 expression is significantly associated with an invasive phenotype of tumors or metastases in patients [8386]. In vitro a significant amount of TGF-β1 is produced in the poorly differentiated prostate carcinoma cell lines but not in well-differentiated cells [87]. These data imply that TGF-β1 may increase metastasis by a paracrine matter, such as suppression of local immune response or increased angiogenesis. Indeed, in the biopsies of cervical carcinoma tumors, an inverse relationship between TGF-β1 expression in tumor cells and the extent of TICs is demonstrated [88]. This clinical observation is further confirmed by several experimental studies. In a mouse skin explant model, TGF-β1 is produced by progressor types but not regressor squamous cell carcinoma lines, and this tumor-derived cytokine inhibits migration of professional APCs, Langerhans cells (LCs), and keeps them in an immature form [89], or transgenic expression of TGF-β1 enhances growth of regressor squamous carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo just like progressor phenotype, and reduces the number of infiltrating LCs, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [90]. A further study with invasive colon carcinoma U9A cell line shows that decreasing TGF-β1 expression by antisense reduces the invasive activity and metastasis of tumor cells to the liver [91]. All these studies suggest that carcinoma-derived TGF-β plays an important role in the tumor metastasis, which may be caused by its immune suppressive function.

Gal-1 is a member of β-galacosidess binding protein family (galectins), and is a recently identified immunoregulatory cytokine-like molecule in cancer [92]. It has been documented that Gal-1 exhibits immunoregulatory effects by which it controls immune cell trafficking, regulates activation of dendritic cells (DCs) and induces T-cell apoptosis [93]. Up-regulation of Gal-1 expression has been seen in a variety of carcinoma biopsies, particularly in tumor-associated stroma, and is associated with tumor invasiveness or worse prognoses [9497] and with reduced infiltrating T cells [98], suggesting that Gal-1, produced by carcinoma and/or stromal cells surrounding the tumor, may take a part in the carcinoma immune-escape by regulation of T cell homeostasis. This hypothesis is supported by a recent study showing that tumor cell-expressing Gal-1 induces T cell apoptosis in a co-culture system [99].

Immune inhibitory ligands: B7 family members (B7-H1, -H3 and -H4)

B7-H1 (PD-L1) is a ligand for the receptor PD-1 on T cell, and is known to negatively regulate T-cell activation [100]. Similar to B7-H1, B7-H3 or -H4 ligation of T cells has a profound inhibitory effect on Th1 differentiation [101], as well as the proliferation, differentiation and cytotoxicity of T cells [102]. Over-expression of these B7 family members (B7-H1, -H3 or -H4) has been documented in various types of carcinoma as compared to healthy controls: (1) H7-H1 in pancreatic tumors [103, 104], RCC [105, 106], human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [107, 108], urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) [109] and NSCLC [110]; (2) B7-H3 in UCC [111]; and (4) H7-H4 in NSCLC [112], breast cancer [113, 114] and ovarian cancer [115]. Tumor B7-H1 expression is significantly associated with less TICs including PD-1 positive immune cells, poor tumor differentiation, advanced tumor stage and poorer survival of patients [103, 104, 106110, 115]. Similar correlation of B7-H4 with clinicopathological features has been reported as well [111114].

In parallel with up-regulation of B7-H1, the number of PD-1+ CD8+ cells increases in tumor tissues, such as HCC [108, 116] and prostate cancer [117], and these tumor-infiltrating CD8+ cells have been shown to be impaired in the granule and cytokine productions [108, 117119]. In addition, blocking the interaction of B7-H1 with PD-1 using neutralizing antibody restores the effector function of tumor-infiltrating T cells [108, 119] and in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer, the antibody therapy, combined with gemocitabine, induces a complete regression of tumor growth [104]. All these studies indicate that up-regulation of B7 inhibitory molecules acts as an immunosuppressive strategy for carcinoma to escape from anti-carcinoma immunity during cell-cell contact with T cells.

Depletion of amino acids enzymes: indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and arginase (ARG)

The mechanisms by which IDO induces immunosuppression have been recently reviewed [120]. IDO is a tryptophan-catabolising enzyme. Up-regulation of its synthesis has been documented in IFN-γ-stimulated cultures of KB oral carcinoma and WiDr colon adenocarcinoma [121], pancreatic carcinomal cells [122], hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines [123], and colorectal carcinoma cell lines [124]. Over-expression of IDO protein is reported in the cancerous lesions, and significantly correlates with carcinoma metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with a variety of carcinoma cancers [122126]. The up-regulation of IDO is associated with a significant reduction of CD3+ TICs [124], or with an increased number of regulatory T (Treg) cells in the metastatic carcinoma in lymph nodes (LNs) [122]. Ectopic expression of IDO enhances tumor growth of the human endometrial carcinoma cell line AMEC and suppresses cytotoxicity of NK cells in a mouse xenograft model [127]. All these observations suggest that IDO-high expression in carcinoma cells in primary tumors may defeat the invasion of effector T cells and NK cells via local tryptophan depletion as well as production of proapoptotic tryptophan catabolites. Also, IDO in metastatic carcinoma cells may enhance the differentiation of Treg cells as a potent immunosuppressive strategy.

ARG is an arginine-metabolic enzyme converting L-arginine into L-ornithine and urea [128]. It has been suggested that arginine is one of essential amino acids for T cell activation and proliferation [129], and the depletion of extracellular arginine by ARG results in the modulation of CD3ζ chain expression and proliferative suppression in T cells [130]. A significantly high level of ARG activity has been demonstrated in the carcinomas of the prostate [131], the gallbladder [132] and the lung [133, 134], but the evidence for the contribution of ARG activity to tumor immune escape is still weak; ARGII and NOSII together has been shown to participate in local peroxynitrite dependent immune suppression of prostate cancer [135], but not seen in lung cancer [136]. However, this enzyme may play a critical role in the immunosuppressive activity of tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) as discussed below.

Immunosuppressive cells: CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells and Tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)

Treg cells can inactivate both effector/helper T and B cells. After activation, Treg cells not only produce abundant anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and TGF-β, but also express cell surface CTLA-4, which binds to B7 molecules on APCs, resulting in suppression of effector T cells and their dependent B cells. Numerous studies with cancer patients have demonstrated that the prevalence of Treg cells is significantly high in cancerous lesions as compared to those in healthy controls [136141], and the percentage of Treg cells among TICs positively correlates with a significantly lower survival rate [138, 139, 142]. In mice challenged with pancreas adenocarcinoma cells (Pan02), depletion of Treg cells promotes a tumor-specific immune response, and significantly associates with smaller size of tumor and longer survival [143]. All these studies suggest that an increase in Treg cells in TICs may play a central role in self-tolerance to carcinoma cells, which may "hijack" these Treg cells as an effective strategy for immunoescape by suppression of anti-carcinoma immunity.

However, the mechanism of elevation of Treg cells in TICs is not fully clarified, but may be due to their local proliferation/differentiation or recruitment from circulation to cancerous lesion or to both. Indeed, the presence of Treg cells in carcinoma lesions is in conjunction with immature DCs, Th2 cytokine dominant microenvironment, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and IDO activity [122, 144, 145] or is required the function of CCL22 [146] and/or CCL5 [147]. Chemokine CCL22 and CCL5 mediate trafficking of Treg cells to the tumors, whereas immature DCs, Th2 cytokines and PGE2 favor Treg cell proliferation and/or differentiation.

MDSCs represent a heterogeneous population of immunosuppressive cells expressing a variety of surface markers, such as CD11c+, CD11b+, CD33+, CD34+ and CD15+. In patients with all different types of carcinomas, an increasing number of MDSCs have been found in peripheral blood [148150] and/or intratumor lesions [151153]. The frequency of these cells also positively correlates with the incidence of recurrence or metastatic disease in patients [153, 154]. Experimental studies show that MDSCs can function as potent suppressors of cytotoxicity of both effector CD8+ T-cells [155] and NK cells [156]. The immunosuppressive activities of MDSCs may depend on the activity of ARG and/or reactive oxygen species they produce [150, 157, 158] or the induction of Foxp3+ Treg cells [159]. All these studies suggest that MDSCs may be one of important factors responsible not only for systemic immune dysfunction in cancer patients but also for local carcinoma immune escape.

Conclusions

The evidence from the limited literature we reviewed clearly indicates that carcinoma development in patients closely correlates to its ability to inactivate effector cytotoxic lymphocytes (i.e. CD8+ CTL and NK cells), to induce TIC apoptosis and/or to suppress the anti-carcinoma immune response, as indicated by: (1) down-regulation of antigen-presenting protein HLA class I; (2) up-regulation of immunosuppressive proteins, such as cell surface FasL, HLA-G, immune inhibitory ligand B7 family members, secreted cytokine TGF-β and Gal-1, enzyme IDO and perhaps ARG, and (3) induction/expansion of immunosuppressive cells: MDSCs and/or Foxp3+ Treg cells (Figure 1). Thus, it must be acknowledged that carcinoma develops multiple adaptation mechanisms against immune surveillance, but different types of carcinoma cancer may use different anti-immune strategies depending on the spectrum of host anti-carcinoma immunity in patients. Further understanding of these mechanisms by which carcinomas cells resist to anti-carcinoma immunity will lead to develop more effective immunotherapyi
Figure 1

Diagram for the expression of immunoregulatory molecules during the transformation of epithelial cells to carcinoma tumor cells under the pressure from immune surveillance. Loss of classical and/or up-regulation of non-classical HLA class I expressions may be able to avoid the stimulation of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and NK cells; Up-regulation of pro-apoptotic ligands, such as Fas L and RCAS1 may directly induce anti-carcinoma immune cell death. Secretion of TGF-beta1 and Gal-1, expression of immune inhibitor ligands (B7-H1 -H3 and -H4), up-regulation of IDO and/or ARG activity and/or expansion of cellular immunosuppression by MDSCs and Foxp3 Treg cells could generate an immunosuppressive microenvironment, protecting carcinoma cells from immune surveillance.

Abbreviations

APC: 

Antigen presenting cell

ARG: 

Arginase

CTL: 

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte

DC: 

Dendritic cell

Gal: 

Galectin

HCC: 

human hepatocellular carcinoma

HLA: 

Human leukocyte antigen

HNSCC: 

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

IDO: 

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

IL: 

Interleukin

ILT: 

Ig-like transcript

KIR: 

Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor

LC: 

Langerhans cell

MDSC: 

Tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cell

NK: 

Natural killer

NSCLC: 

Non-small cell lung cancer

PGE2: 

Prostaglandin E2

RCAS1: 

Receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells

RCC: 

Renal cell carcinomas

TGF: 

Transforming growth factor

TIC: 

Tumor-infiltrating immune cell

Treg: 

Regulatory T cel

UCC: 

Urothelial cell carcinoma.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Michael E. Cox (Vancouver Prostate Centre, BC) for constructive comments, and want to apologize to those authors important contributions to this field are not mentioned in this review because of the length limitation.

Funding

This work was supported by the start-up funding from the University of British Columbia and the Vancouver Coast Health Research Institute (C.D.) and a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Y.Z.).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia
(2)
Immunity and Infection Research Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute
(3)
Vancouver Prostate Centre
(4)
Living Tumor Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency

References

  1. Cole WH: Relationship of causative factors in spontaneous regression of cancer to immunologic factors possibly effective in cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1976, 8: 391-411. 10.1002/jso.2930080506.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Whiteside TL: The role of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Treat Res. 2006, 130: 103-124. full_text.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Maccalli C, Scaramuzza S, Parmiani G: TNK cells (NKG2D+ CD8+ or CD4+ T lymphocytes) in the control of human tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009, 58: 801-808. 10.1007/s00262-008-0635-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nelson BH: CD20+ B cells: the other tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2010, 185: 4977-4982. 10.4049/jimmunol.1001323.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho Y, Miyamoto M, Kato K, Fukunaga A, Shichinohe T, Kawarada Y, Hida Y, Oshikiri T, Kurokawa T, Suzuoki M, Nakakubo Y, Hiraoka K, Murakami S, Shinohara T, Itoh T, Okushiba S, Kondo S, Katoh H: CD4+ and CD8+ T cells cooperate to improve prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 1555-1559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eerola AK, Soini Y, Paakko P: Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in relation to tumour angiogenesis, apoptosis and prognosis in patients with large cell lung carcinoma. Lung Cancer. 1999, 26: 73-83. 10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00072-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Oberg A, Samii S, Stenling R, Lindmark G: Different occurrence of CD8+, CD45R0+, and CD68+ immune cells in regional lymph node metastases from colorectal cancer as potential prognostic predictors. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002, 17: 25-29. 10.1007/s003840100337.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chikamatsu K, Eura M, Nakano K, Masuyama K, Ishikawa T: Functional and T cell receptor gene usage analysis of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in fresh tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from human head and neck cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1995, 86: 477-483.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Housseau F, Zeliszewski D, Roy M, Paradis V, Richon S, Ricour A, Bougaran J, Prapotnich D, Vallancien G, Benoit G, Desportes L, Bedossa P, Hercend T, Bidart JM, Bellet D: MHC-dependent cytolysis of autologous tumor cells by lymphocytes infiltrating urothelial carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 1997, 71: 585-594. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970516)71:4<585::AID-IJC13>3.0.CO;2-B.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Verdegaal EM, Hoogstraten C, Sandel MH, Kuppen PJ, Brink AA, Claas FH, Gorsira MC, Graadt van Roggen JF, Osanto S: Functional CD8+ T cells infiltrate into nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007, 56: 587-600. 10.1007/s00262-006-0214-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Modugno F, Bronzi G, Scanlan MJ, Del Bello D, Cascioli S, Venturo I, Botti C, Nicotra MR, Mottolese M, Natali PG, Santoni A, Jager E, Nistico P: Human Mena protein, a serex-defined antigen overexpressed in breast cancer eliciting both humoral and CD8+ T-cell immune response. Int J Cancer. 2004, 109: 909-918. 10.1002/ijc.20094.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mosolits S, Steinitz M, Harmenberg U, Ruden U, Eriksson E, Mellstedt H, Fagerberg J: Immunogenic regions of the GA733-2 tumour-associated antigen recognised by autoantibodies of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2002, 51: 209-218. 10.1007/s00262-002-0272-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zeng G, Aldridge ME, Wang Y, Pantuck AJ, Wang AY, Liu YX, Han Y, Yuan YH, Robbins PF, Dubinett SM, deKernion JB, Belldegrun AS: Dominant B cell epitope from NY-ESO-1 recognized by sera from a wide spectrum of cancer patients: implications as a potential biomarker. Int J Cancer. 2005, 114: 268-273. 10.1002/ijc.20716.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kerr KM, Johnson SK, King G, Kennedy MM, Weir J, Jeffrey R: Partial regression in primary carcinoma of the lung: does it occur?. Histopathology. 1998, 33: 55-63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Patel A, Halliday GM, Barnetson RS: CD4+ T lymphocyte infiltration correlates with regression of a UV-induced squamous cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Sci. 1995, 9: 12-19. 10.1016/0923-1811(94)00344-E.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Patel A, Halliday GM, Cooke BE, Barnetson RS: Evidence that regression in keratoacanthoma is immunologically mediated: a comparison with squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 1994, 131: 789-798. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb08580.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nedergaard BS, Ladekarl M, Thomsen HF, Nyengaard JR, Nielsen K: Low density of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells is associated with increased risk of relapse in squamous cell cervical cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007, 97: 1135-1138. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604001.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Øvestad IT, Gudlaugsson E, Skaland I, Malpica A, Kruse AJ, Janssen EA, Baak JP: Local immune response in the microenvironment of CIN2-3 with and without spontaneous regression. Mod Pathol. 2010, 23: 1231-1240.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wroblewski JM, Bixby DL, Borowski C, Yannelli JR: Characterization of human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines for expression of MHC, co-stimulatory molecules and tumor-associated antigens. Lung Cancer. 2001, 33: 181-194. 10.1016/S0169-5002(01)00210-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Cabrera T, Pedrajas G, Cozar JM, Garrido A, Vicente J, Tallada M, Garrido F: HLA class I expression in bladder carcinomas. Tissue Antigens. 2003, 62: 324-327. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2003.00104.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Levin I, Klein T, Goldstein J, Kuperman O, Kanetti J, Klein B: Expression of class I histocompatibility antigens in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder in relation to survival. Cancer. 1991, 68: 2591-2594. 10.1002/1097-0142(19911215)68:12<2591::AID-CNCR2820681212>3.0.CO;2-L.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein B, Klein T, Nyska A, Shapira J, Figer A, Schwartz A, Rakovsky E, Livni E, Lurie H: Expression of HLA class I and class II in gastric carcinoma in relation to pathologic stage. Tumour Biol. 1991, 12: 68-74. 10.1159/000217690.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Rockett JC, Darnton SJ, Crocker J, Matthews HR, Morris AG: Expression of HLA-ABC, HLA-DR and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in oesophageal carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 1995, 48: 539-544. 10.1136/jcp.48.6.539.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Redondo M, Concha A, Oldiviela R, Cueto A, Gonzalez A, Garrido F, Ruiz-Cabello F: Expression of HLA class I and II antigens in bronchogenic carcinomas: its relationship to cellular DNA content and clinical-pathological parameters. Cancer Res. 1991, 51: 4948-4954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Passlick B, Pantel K, Kubuschok B, Angstwurm M, Neher A, Thetter O, Schweiberer L, Izbicki JR: Expression of MHC molecules and ICAM-1 on non-small cell lung carcinomas: association with early lymphatic spread of tumour cells. Eur J Cancer. 1996, 32A: 141-145. 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00551-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Vitale M, Rezzani R, Rodella L, Zauli G, Grigolato P, Cadei M, Hicklin DJ, Ferrone S: HLA class I antigen and transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP1 and TAP2) down-regulation in high-grade primary breast carcinoma lesions. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 737-742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Saio M, Teicher M, Campbell G, Feiner H, Delgado Y, Frey AB: Immunocytochemical demonstration of down regulation of HLA class-I molecule expression in human metastatic breast carcinoma. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2004, 21: 243-249. 10.1023/B:CLIN.0000037707.07428.ff.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryschich E, Notzel T, Hinz U, Autschbach F, Ferguson J, Simon I, Weitz J, Frohlich B, Klar E, Buchler MW, Schmidt J: Control of T-cell-mediated immune response by HLA class I in human pancreatic carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (2 Pt 1): 498-504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sharpe JC, Abel PD, Gilbertson JA, Brawn P, Foster CS: Modulated expression of human leucocyte antigen class I and class II determinants in hyperplastic and malignant human prostatic epithelium. Br J Urol. 1994, 74: 609-616. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1994.tb09193.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Brasanac D, Markovic-Lipkovski J, Hadzi-Djokic J, Muller GA, Muller CA: Immunohistochemical analysis of HLA class II antigens and tumor infiltrating mononuclear cells in renal cell carcinoma: correlation with clinical and histopathological data. Neoplasma. 1999, 46: 173-178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hilders CG, Houbiers JG, van Ravenswaay Claasen HH, Veldhuizen RW, Fleuren GJ: Association between HLA-expression and infiltration of immune cells in cervical carcinoma. Lab Invest. 1993, 69: 651-659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hilders CG, Munoz IM, Nooyen Y, Fleuren GJ: Altered HLA expression by metastatic cervical carcinoma cells as a factor in impaired immune surveillance. Gynecol Oncol. 1995, 57: 366-375. 10.1006/gyno.1995.1156.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Cruz I, Meijer CJ, Walboomers JM, Snijders PJ, Van der Waal I: Lack of MHC class I surface expression on neoplastic cells and poor activation of the secretory pathway of cytotoxic cells in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Br J Cancer. 1999, 81: 881-889. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690780.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Grandis JR, Falkner DM, Melhem MF, Gooding WE, Drenning SD, Morel PA: Human leukocyte antigen class I allelic and haplotype loss in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: clinical and immunogenetic consequences. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6: 2794-2802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gati A, Da Rocha S, Guerra N, Escudier B, Moretta A, Chouaib S, Angevin E, Caignard A: Analysis of the natural killer mediated immune response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Int J Cancer. 2004, 109: 393-401. 10.1002/ijc.11730.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lanier LL: Natural killer cells: from no receptors to too many. Immunity. 1997, 6: 371-378. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80280-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Doubrovina ES, Doubrovin MM, Vider E, Sisson RB, O'Reilly RJ, Dupont B, Vyas YM: Evasion from NK cell immunity by MHC class I chain-related molecules expressing colon adenocarcinoma. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 6891-6899.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Le Maux Chansac B, Moretta A, Vergnon I, Opolon P, Lecluse Y, Grunenwald D, Kubin M, Soria JC, Chouaib S, Mami-Chouaib F: NK cells infiltrating a MHC class I-deficient lung adenocarcinoma display impaired cytotoxic activity toward autologous tumor cells associated with altered NK cell-triggering receptors. J Immunol. 2005, 175: 5790-5798.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Kovats S, Main EK, Librach C, Stubblebine M, Fisher SJ, DeMars R: A class I antigen, HLA-G, expressed in human trophoblasts. Science. 1990, 248: 220-223. 10.1126/science.2326636.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Le Gal FA, Riteau B, Sedlik C, Khalil-Daher I, Menier C, Dausset J, Guillet JG, Carosella ED, Rouas-Freiss N: HLA-G-mediated inhibition of antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Int Immunol. 1999, 11: 1351-1356. 10.1093/intimm/11.8.1351.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajagopalan S, Long EO: A human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G-specific receptor expressed on all natural killer cells. J Exp Med. 1999, 189: 1093-1100. 10.1084/jem.189.7.1093.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Barrier BF, Kendall BS, Sharpe-Timms KL, Kost ER: Characterization of human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) expression in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2006, 103: 25-30. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.01.045.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Ibrahim EC, Guerra N, Lacombe MJ, Angevin E, Chouaib S, Carosella ED, Caignard A, Paul P: Tumor-specific up-regulation of the nonclassical class I HLA-G antigen expression in renal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 6838-6845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lefebvre S, Antoine M, Uzan S, McMaster M, Dausset J, Carosella ED, Paul P: Specific activation of the non-classical class I histocompatibility HLA-G antigen and expression of the ILT2 inhibitory receptor in human breast cancer. J Pathol. 2002, 196: 266-274. 10.1002/path.1039.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ye SR, Yang H, Li K, Dong DD, Lin XM, Yie SM: Human leukocyte antigen G expression: as a significant prognostic indicator for patients with colorectal cancer. Mod Pathol. 2007, 20: 375-383. 10.1038/modpathol.3800751.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Belluco C, Esposito G, Bertorelle R, Alaggio R, Giacomelli L, Bianchi LC, Nitti D, Lise M: Fas ligand is up-regulated during the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002, 28: 120-125. 10.1053/ejso.2001.1223.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Shimoyama M, Kanda T, Liu L, Koyama Y, Suda T, Sakai Y, Hatakeyama K: Expression of Fas ligand is an early event in colorectal carcinogenesis. J Surg Oncol. 2001, 76: 63-68. 10.1002/1096-9098(200101)76:1<63::AID-JSO1011>3.0.CO;2-C.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Nozoe T, Yasuda M, Honda M, Inutsuka S, Korenaga D: Fas ligand expression is correlated with metastasis in colorectal carcinoma. Oncology. 2003, 65: 83-88. 10.1159/000071208.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Shiraki K, Tsuji N, Shioda T, Isselbacher KJ, Takahashi H: Expression of Fas ligand in liver metastases of human colonic adenocarcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 6420-6425. 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6420.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolkersdorfer GW, Marx C, Brown J, Schroder S, Fussel M, Rieber EP, Kuhlisch E, Ehninger G, Bornstein SR: Prevalence of HLA-DRB1 genotype and altered Fas/Fas ligand expression in adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 90: 1768-1774. 10.1210/jc.2004-1406.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Chopin D, Barei-Moniri R, Maille P, Le Frere-Belda MA, Muscatelli-Groux B, Merendino N, Lecerf L, Stoppacciaro A, Velotti F: Human urinary bladder transitional cell carcinomas acquire the functional Fas ligand during tumor progression. Am J Pathol. 2003, 162: 1139-1149.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Korkolopoulou P, Goudopoulou A, Voutsinas G, Thomas-Tsagli E, Kapralos P, Patsouris E, Saetta AA: c-FLIP expression in bladder urothelial carcinomas: its role in resistance to Fas-mediated apoptosis and clinicopathologic correlations. Urology. 2004, 63: 1198-1204. 10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Ohta T, Elnemr A, Kitagawa H, Kayahara M, Takamura H, Fujimura T, Nishimura G, Shimizu K, Yi SQ, Miwa K: Fas ligand expression in human pancreatic cancer. Oncol Rep. 2004, 12: 749-754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ho SY, Guo HR, Chen HH, Hsiao JR, Jin YT, Tsai ST: Prognostic implications of Fas-ligand expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck. 2004, 26: 977-983. 10.1002/hed.20090.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Osaki M, Kase S, Kodani I, Watanabe M, Adachi H, Ito H: Expression of Fas and Fas ligand in human gastric adenomas and intestinal-type carcinomas: correlation with proliferation and apoptosis. Gastric Cancer. 2001, 4: 198-205. 10.1007/s10120-001-8010-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Kase H, Aoki Y, Tanaka K: Fas ligand expression in cervical adenocarcinoma: relevance to lymph node metastasis and tumor progression. Gynecol Oncol. 2003, 90: 70-74. 10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00206-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Younes M, Schwartz MR, Ertan A, Finnie D, Younes A: Fas ligand expression in esophageal carcinomas and their lymph node metastases. Cancer. 2000, 88: 524-528. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000201)88:3<524::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO;2-U.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Bennett MW, O'Connell J, O'Sullivan GC, Roche D, Brady C, Kelly J, Collins JK, Shanahan F: Expression of Fas ligand by human gastric adenocarcinomas: a potential mechanism of immune escape in stomach cancer. Gut. 1999, 44: 156-162. 10.1136/gut.44.2.156.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Bernstorff WV, Glickman JN, Odze RD, Farraye FA, Joo HG, Goedegebuure PS, Eberlein TJ: Fas (CD95/APO-1) and Fas ligand expression in normal pancreas and pancreatic tumors. Implications for immune privilege and immune escape. Cancer. 2002, 94: 2552-2560. 10.1002/cncr.10549.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Ibrahim R, Frederickson H, Parr A, Ward Y, Moncur J, Khleif SN: Expression of FasL in squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its role in tumor escape mechanism. Cancer. 2006, 106: 1065-1077. 10.1002/cncr.21697.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. O'Connell J, Bennett MW, O'Sullivan GC, Roche D, Kelly J, Collins JK, Shanahan F: Fas ligand expression in primary colon adenocarcinomas: evidence that the Fas counterattack is a prevalent mechanism of immune evasion in human colon cancer. J Pathol. 1998, 186: 240-246.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Gastman BR, Atarshi Y, Reichert TE, Saito T, Balkir L, Rabinowich H, Whiteside TL: Fas ligand is expressed on human squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck, and it promotes apoptosis of T lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 5356-5364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Niehans GA, Brunner T, Frizelle SP, Liston JC, Salerno CT, Knapp DJ, Green DR, Kratzke RA: Human lung carcinomas express Fas ligand. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 1007-1012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Perabo FG, Kamp S, Schmidt D, Lindner H, Steiner G, Mattes RH, Wirger A, Pegelow K, Albers P, Kohn EC, von Ruecker A, Mueller SC: Bladder cancer cells acquire competent mechanisms to escape Fas-mediated apoptosis and immune surveillance in the course of malignant transformation. Br J Cancer. 2001, 84: 1330-1338. 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1808.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Strand S, Hofmann WJ, Hug H, Muller M, Otto G, Strand D, Mariani SM, Stremmel W, Krammer PH, Galle PR: Lymphocyte apoptosis induced by CD95 (APO-1/Fas) ligand-expressing tumor cells-a mechanism of immune evasion?. Nat Med. 1996, 2: 1361-1366. 10.1038/nm1296-1361.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Ungefroren H, Voss M, Jansen M, Roeder C, Henne-Bruns D, Kremer B, Kalthoff H: Human pancreatic adenocarcinomas express Fas and Fas ligand yet are resistant to Fas-mediated apoptosis. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 1741-1749.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Nagashima H, Mori M, Sadanaga N, Mashino K, Yoshikawa Y, Sugimachi K: Expression of Fas ligand in gastric carcinoma relates to lymph node metastasis. Int J Oncol. 2001, 18: 1157-1162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Okada K, Komuta K, Hashimoto S, Matsuzaki S, Kanematsu T, Koji T: Frequency of apoptosis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes induced by fas counterattack in human colorectal carcinoma and its correlation with prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6: 3560-3564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Shimonishi T, Isse K, Shibata F, Aburatani I, Tsuneyama K, Sabit H, Harada K, Miyazaki K, Nakanuma Y: Up-regulation of fas ligand at early stages and down-regulation of Fas at progressed stages of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reflect evasion from immune surveillance. Hepatology. 2000, 32 (4 Pt 1): 761-769. 10.1053/jhep.2000.18192.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Bennett MW, O'Connell J, O'Sullivan GC, Brady C, Roche D, Collins JK, Shanahan F: The Fas counterattack in vivo: apoptotic depletion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes associated with Fas ligand expression by human esophageal carcinoma. J Immunol. 1998, 160: 5669-5675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Houston A, Waldron-Lynch FD, Bennett MW, Roche D, O'Sullivan GC, Shanahan F, O'Connell J: Fas ligand expressed in colon cancer is not associated with increased apoptosis of tumor cells in vivo. Int J Cancer. 2003, 107: 209-214. 10.1002/ijc.11392.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Ryan AE, Shanahan F, O'Connell J, Houston AM: Addressing the "Fas counterattack" controversy: blocking fas ligand expression suppresses tumor immune evasion of colon cancer in vivo. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 9817-9823. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1462.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Nishimatsu H, Takeuchi T, Ueki T, Kajiwara T, Moriyama N, Ishida T, Li B, Kakizoe T, Kitamura T: CD95 ligand expression enhances growth of murine renal cell carcinoma in vivo. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1999, 48: 56-61. 10.1007/s002620050548.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Wada A, Tada Y, Kawamura K, Takiguchi Y, Tatsumi K, Kuriyama T, Takenouchi T, O-Wang J, Tagawa M: The effects of FasL on inflammation and tumor survival are dependent on its expression levels. Cancer Gene Ther. 2007, 14: 262-267. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7701008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Cefai D, Schwaninger R, Balli M, Brunner T, Gimmi CD: Functional characterization of Fas ligand on tumor cells escaping active specific immunotherapy. Cell Death Differ. 2001, 8: 687-695. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400862.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Dutsch-Wicherek M, Tomaszewska R, Lazar A, Wicherek L, Skladzien J: The association between RCAS1 expression in laryngeal and pharyngeal cancer and its healthy stroma with cancer relapse. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 35-10.1186/1471-2407-9-35.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Fukuda M, Tanaka A, Hamao A, Suzuki S, Kusama K, Sakashita H: Expression of RCAS1 and its function in human squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oncol Rep. 2004, 12: 259-267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Giaginis C, Davides D, Zarros A, Noussia O, Zizi-Serbetzoglou A, Kouraklis G, Theocharis S: Clinical significance of tumor-associated antigen RCAS1 expression in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2008, 53: 1728-1734. 10.1007/s10620-007-0035-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Kato H, Nakajima M, Masuda N, Faried A, Sohda M, Fukai Y, Miyazaki T, Fukuchi M, Tsukada K, Kuwano H: Expression of RCAS1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with a poor prognosis. J Surg Oncol. 2005, 90: 89-94. 10.1002/jso.20249.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Toyoshima T, Nakamura S, Kumamaru W, Kawamura E, Ishibashi H, Hayashida JN, Moriyama M, Ohyama Y, Sasaki M, Shirasuna K: Expression of tumor-associated antigen RCAS1 and its possible involvement in immune evasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2006, 35: 361-368. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00442.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Tsujitani S, Saito H, Oka S, Sakamoto T, Kanaji S, Tatebe S, Ikeguchi M: Prognostic significance of RCAS1 expression in relation to the infiltration of dendritic cells and lymphocytes in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2007, 52: 549-554. 10.1007/s10620-006-9408-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Diegmann J, Junker K, Loncarevic IF, Michel S, Schimmel B, von Eggeling F: Immune escape for renal cell carcinoma: CD70 mediates apoptosis in lymphocytes. Neoplasia. 2006, 8: 933-938. 10.1593/neo.06451.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Friedman E, Gold LI, Klimstra D, Zeng ZS, Winawer S, Cohen A: High levels of transforming growth factor beta 1 correlate with disease progression in human colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995, 4: 549-554.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Mitropoulos D, Kiroudi A, Christelli E, Serafetinidis E, Zervas A, Anastasiou I, Dimopoulos C: Expression of transforming growth factor beta in renal cell carcinoma and matched non-involved renal tissue. Urol Res. 2004, 32: 317-322. 10.1007/s00240-003-0360-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Santin AD, Hermonat PL, Hiserodt JC, Fruehauf J, Schranz V, Barclay D, Pecorelli S, Parham GP: Differential transforming growth factor-beta secretion in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1997, 64: 477-480. 10.1006/gyno.1996.4579.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Walker RA, Dearing SJ: Transforming growth factor beta 1 in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinomas of the breast. Eur J Cancer. 1992, 28: 641-644. 10.1016/S0959-8049(05)80116-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Steiner MS, Zhou ZZ, Tonb DC, Barrack ER: Expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in prostate cancer. Endocrinology. 1994, 135: 2240-2247. 10.1210/en.135.5.2240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Hazelbag S, Gorter A, Kenter GG, van den Broek L, Fleuren G: Transforming growth factor-beta1 induces tumor stroma and reduces tumor infiltrate in cervical cancer. Hum Pathol. 2002, 33: 1193-1199. 10.1053/hupa.2002.130109.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Halliday GM, Le S: Transforming growth factor-beta produced by progressor tumors inhibits, while IL-10 produced by regressor tumors enhances, Langerhans cell migration from skin. Int Immunol. 2001, 13: 1147-1154. 10.1093/intimm/13.9.1147.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Weber F, Byrne SN, Le S, Brown DA, Breit SN, Scolyer RA, Halliday GM: Transforming growth factor-beta1 immobilises dendritic cells within skin tumours and facilitates tumour escape from the immune system. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005, 54: 898-906. 10.1007/s00262-004-0652-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Huang F, Newman E, Theodorescu D, Kerbel RS, Friedman E: Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF beta 1) is an autocrine positive regulator of colon carcinoma U9 cells in vivo as shown by transfection of a TGF beta 1 antisense expression plasmid. Cell Growth Differ. 1995, 6: 1635-1642.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Demydenko D, Berest I: Expression of galectin-1 in malignant tumors. Exp Oncol. 2009, 31: 74-79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Cooper D, Ilarregui JM, Pesoa SA, Croci DO, Perretti M, Rabinovich GA: Multiple functional targets of the immunoregulatory activity of galectin-1: Control of immune cell trafficking, dendritic cell physiology, and T-cell fate. Methods Enzymol. 2010, 480: 199-244. full_text.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Jung EJ, Moon HG, Cho BI, Jeong CY, Joo YT, Lee YJ, Hong SC, Choi SK, Ha WS, Kim JW, Lee CW, Lee JS, Park ST: Galectin-1 expression in cancer-associated stromal cells correlates tumor invasiveness and tumor progression in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007, 120: 2331-2338. 10.1002/ijc.22434.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Saussez S, Decaestecker C, Lorfevre F, Cucu DR, Mortuaire G, Chevalier D, Wacreniez A, Kaltner H, André S, Toubeau G, Camby I, Gabius HJ, Kiss R: High level of galectin-1 expression is a negative prognostic predictor of recurrence in laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Oncol. 2007, 30: 1109-1117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Spano D, Russo R, Di Maso V, Rosso N, Terracciano LM, Roncalli M, Tornillo L, Capasso M, Tiribelli C, Iolascon A: Galectin-1 and its involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma aggressiveness. Mol Med. 2010, 16: 102-115. 10.2119/molmed.2009.00119.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Chiang WF, Liu SY, Fang LY, Lin CN, Wu MH, Chen YC, Chen YL, Jin YT: Overexpression of galectin-1 at the tumor invasion front is associated with poor prognosis in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2008, 44: 325-334. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.03.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Le QT, Shi G, Cao H, Nelson DW, Wang Y, Chen EY, Zhao S, Kong C, Richardson D, O'Byrne KJ, Giaccia AJ, Koong AC: Galectin-1: a link between tumor hypoxia and tumor immune privilege. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 8932-8941. 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.0206.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Kovács-Sólyom F, Blaskó A, Fajka-Boja R, Katona RL, Végh L, Novák J, Szebeni GJ, Krenács L, Uher F, Tubak V, Kiss R, Monostori E: Mechanism of tumor cell-induced T-cell apoptosis mediated by galectin-1. Immunol Lett. 2010, 127: 108-118.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Dong H, Zhu G, Tamada K, Chen L: B7-H1, a third member of the B7 family, co-stimulates T-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat Med. 1999, 5: 1365-1369. 10.1038/70932.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Suh WK, Gajewska BU, Okada H, Gronski MA, Bertram EM, Dawicki W, Duncan GS, Bukczynski J, Plyte S, Elia A, Wakeham A, Itie A, Chung S, Da Costa J, Arya S, Horan T, Campbell P, Gaida K, Ohashi PS, Watts TH, Yoshinaga SK, Bray MR, Jordana M, Mak TW: The B7 family member B7-H3 preferentially down-regulates T helper type 1-mediated immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2003, 4: 899-906. 10.1038/ni967.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Sica G, Zelano G, Settesoldi D, Iacopino F: Regulation of prostate-specific antigen gene expression by an LH-RH analogue in human prostatic cells. Anticancer Res. 2003, 23: 1283-1287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Geng L, Huang D, Liu J, Qian Y, Deng J, Li D, Hu Z, Zhang J, Jiang G, Zheng S: B7-H1 up-regulated expression in human pancreatic carcinoma tissue associates with tumor progression. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008, 134: 1021-1027. 10.1007/s00432-008-0364-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Nomi T, Sho M, Akahori T, Hamada K, Kubo A, Kanehiro H, Nakamura S, Enomoto K, Yagita H, Azuma M, Nakajima Y: Clinical significance and therapeutic potential of the programmed death-1 ligand/programmed death-1 pathway in human pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 2151-2157. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2746.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Krambeck AE, Dong H, Thompson RH, Kuntz SM, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Sebo TJ, Cheville JC, Parker AS, Kwon ED: Survivin and B7-H1 are collaborative predictors of survival and represent potential therapeutic targets for patients with renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 1749-1756. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2129.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Thompson RH, Kuntz SM, Leibovich BC, Dong H, Lohse CM, Webster WS, Sengupta S, Frank I, Parker AS, Zincke H, Blute ML, Sebo TJ, Cheville JC, Kwon ED: Tumor B7-H1 is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma patients with long-term follow-up. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 3381-3385. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Gao Q, Wang XY, Qiu SJ, Yamato I, Sho M, Nakajima Y, Zhou J, Li BZ, Shi YH, Xiao YS, Xu Y, Fan J: Overexpression of PD-L1 significantly associates with tumor aggressiveness and postoperative recurrence in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 971-979. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1608.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Wu K, Kryczek I, Chen L, Zou W, Welling TH: Kupffer cell suppression of CD8+ T cells in human hepatocellular carcinoma is mediated by B7-H1/programmed death-1 interactions. Cancer Res. 2009, 69: 8067-8075. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0901.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Boorjian SA, Sheinin Y, Crispen PL, Farmer SA, Lohse CM, Kuntz SM, Leibovich BC, Kwon ED, Frank I: T-cell coregulatory molecule expression in urothelial cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic correlations and association with survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 4800-4808. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0731.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Konishi J, Yamazaki K, Azuma M, Kinoshita I, Dosaka-Akita H, Nishimura M: B7-H1 expression on non-small cell lung cancer cells and its relationship with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and their PD-1 expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 5094-5100. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0428.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Sun Y, Wang Y, Zhao J, Gu M, Giscombe R, Lefvert AK, Wang X: B7-H3 and B7-H4 expression in non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2006, 53: 143-151. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.05.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Mugler KC, Singh M, Tringler B, Torkko KC, Liu W, Papkoff J, Shroyer KR: B7-H4 expression in a range of breast pathology: correlation with tumor T-cell infiltration. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2007, 15: 363-370. 10.1097/01.pai.0000213159.79557.71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Tringler B, Zhuo S, Pilkington G, Torkko KC, Singh M, Lucia MS, Heinz DE, Papkoff J, Shroyer KR: B7-H4 is highly expressed in ductal and lobular breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11: 1842-1848. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1658.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Miyatake T, Tringler B, Liu W, Liu SH, Papkoff J, Enomoto T, Torkko KC, Dehn DL, Swisher A, Shroyer KR: B7-H4 (DD-O110) is overexpressed in high risk uterine endometrioid adenocarcinomas and inversely correlated with tumor T-cell infiltration. Gynecol Oncol. 2007, 106: 119-127. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.039.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Thompson RH, Dong H, Kwon ED: Implications of B7-H1 expression in clear cell carcinoma of the kidney for prognostication and therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13 (2 Pt 2): 709s-715s. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1868.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Shi F, Shi M, Zeng Z, Qi RZ, Liu ZW, Zhang JY, Yang YP, Tien P, Wang FS: PD-1 and PD-L1 upregulation promotes CD8+ T-cell apoptosis and postoperative recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Int J Cancer. 2011, 128: 887-896. 10.1002/ijc.25397.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Sfanos KS, Bruno TC, Meeker AK, De Marzo AM, Isaacs WB, Drake CG: Human prostate-infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes are oligoclonal and PD-1+. Prostate. 2009, 69: 1694-1703. 10.1002/pros.21020.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Matsuzaki J, Gnjatic S, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Beck A, Miller A, Tsuji T, Eppolito C, Qian F, Lele S, Shrikant P, Old LJ, Odunsi K: Tumor-infiltrating NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cells are negatively regulated by LAG-3 and PD-1 in human ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 7875-7880. 10.1073/pnas.1003345107.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Zhang Y, Huang S, Gong D, Qin Y, Shen Q: Programmed death-1 upregulation is correlated with dysfunction of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes in human non-small cell lung cancer. Cell Mol Immunol. 2010, 7: 389-395. 10.1038/cmi.2010.28.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Munn DH, Mellor AL: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and tumor-induced tolerance. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 1147-1154. 10.1172/JCI31178.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Ozaki Y, Edelstein MP, Duch DS: Induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase: a mechanism of the antitumor activity of interferon gamma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85: 1242-1246. 10.1073/pnas.85.4.1242.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Witkiewicz A, Williams TK, Cozzitorto J, Durkan B, Showalter SL, Yeo CJ, Brody JR: Expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma recruits regulatory T cells to avoid immune detection. J Am Coll Surg. 2008, 206: 849-854. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Pan K, Wang H, Chen MS, Zhang HK, Weng DS, Zhou J, Huang W, Li JJ, Song HF, Xia JC: Expression and prognosis role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008, 134: 1247-1253. 10.1007/s00432-008-0395-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Brandacher G, Perathoner A, Ladurner R, Schneeberger S, Obrist P, Winkler C, Werner ER, Werner-Felmayer G, Weiss HG, Göbel G, Margreiter R, Königsrainer A, Fuchs D, Amberger A: Prognostic value of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression in colorectal cancer: effect on tumor-infiltrating T cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 1144-1151. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1966.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Ino K, Yoshida N, Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Yamamoto E, Kidokoro K, Takahashi N, Terauchi M, Nawa A, Nomura S, Nagasaka T, Takikawa O, Kikkawa F: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is a novel prognostic indicator for endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006, 95: 1555-1561. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603477.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Takao M, Okamoto A, Nikaido T, Urashima M, Takakura S, Saito M, Saito M, Okamoto S, Takikawa O, Sasaki H, Yasuda M, Ochiai K, Tanaka T: Increased synthesis of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase protein is positively associated with impaired survival in patients with serous-type, but not with other types of, ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep. 2007, 17: 1333-1339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Yoshida N, Ino K, Ishida Y, Kajiyama H, Yamamoto E, Shibata K, Terauchi M, Nawa A, Akimoto H, Takikawa O, Isobe K, Kikkawa F: Overexpression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in human endometrial carcinoma cells induces rapid tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 7251-7259. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0991.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Wu G, Morris SM: Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond. Biochem J. 1998, 336 (Pt 1): 1-17.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Rodriguez PC, Zea AH, Culotta KS, Zabaleta J, Ochoa JB, Ochoa AC: Regulation of T cell receptor CD3zeta chain expression by L-arginine. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 21123-21129. 10.1074/jbc.M110675200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Rodriguez PC, Zea AH, DeSalvo J, Culotta KS, Zabaleta J, Quiceno DG, Ochoa JB, Ochoa AC: L-arginine consumption by macrophages modulates the expression of CD3 zeta chain in T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 1232-1239.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Harris BE, Pretlow TP, Bradley EL, Whitehurst GB, Pretlow TG: Arginase activity in prostatic tissue of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1983, 43: 3008-3012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Shukla VK, Tandon A, Ratha BK, Sharma D, Singh TB, Basu S: Arginase activity in carcinoma of the gallbladder: a pilot study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2009, 18: 199-202. 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32832405eb.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Rotondo R, Mastracci L, Piazza T, Barisione G, Fabbi M, Cassanello M, Costa R, Morandi B, Astigiano S, Cesario A, Sormani MP, Ferlazzo G, Grossi F, Ratto GB, Ferrini S, Frumento G: Arginase 2 is expressed by human lung cancer, but it neither induces immune suppression, nor affects disease progression. Int J Cancer. 2008, 123: 1108-1116. 10.1002/ijc.23437.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Suer Gokmen S, Yoruk Y, Cakir E, Yorulmaz F, Gulen S: Arginase and ornithine, as markers in human non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Biochem Biophys. 1999, 17: 125-131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Bronte V, Kasic T, Gri G, Gallana K, Borsellino G, Marigo I, Battistini L, Iafrate M, Prayer-Galetti T, Pagano F, Viola A: Boosting antitumor responses of T lymphocytes infiltrating human prostate cancers. J Exp Med. 2005, 201: 1257-1268. 10.1084/jem.20042028.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Esendagli G, Bruderek K, Goldmann T, Busche A, Branscheid D, Vollmer E, Brandau S: Malignant and non-malignant lung tissue areas are differentially populated by natural killer cells and regulatory T cells in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2008, 59: 32-40. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.07.022.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Griffiths RW, Elkord E, Gilham DE, Ramani V, Clarke N, Stern PL, Hawkins RE: Frequency of regulatory T cells in renal cell carcinoma patients and investigation of correlation with survival. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007, 56: 1743-1753. 10.1007/s00262-007-0318-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Hiraoka N, Onozato K, Kosuge T, Hirohashi S: Prevalence of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells increases during the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its premalignant lesions. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 5423-5434. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0369.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Kobayashi N, Hiraoka N, Yamagami W, Ojima H, Kanai Y, Kosuge T, Nakajima A, Hirohashi S: FOXP3+ regulatory T cells affect the development and progression of hepatocarcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 902-911. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2363.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Liyanage UK, Moore TT, Joo HG, Tanaka Y, Herrmann V, Doherty G, Drebin JA, Strasberg SM, Eberlein TJ, Goedegebuure PS, Linehan DC: Prevalence of regulatory T cells is increased in peripheral blood and tumor microenvironment of patients with pancreas or breast adenocarcinoma. J Immunol. 2002, 169: 2756-2761.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Schwarz S, Butz M, Morsczeck C, Reichert TE, Driemel O: Increased number of CD25 FoxP3 regulatory T cells in oral squamous cell carcinomas detected by chromogenic immunohistochemical double staining. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008, 37: 485-489. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2008.00641.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Siddiqui SA, Frigola X, Bonne-Annee S, Mercader M, Kuntz SM, Krambeck AE, Sengupta S, Dong H, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Krco CJ: Tumor-infiltrating Foxp3-CD4+CD25+ T cells predict poor survival in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 2075-2081. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2139.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Viehl CT, Moore TT, Liyanage UK, Frey DM, Ehlers JP, Eberlein TJ, Goedegebuure PS, Linehan DC: Depletion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells promotes a tumor-specific immune response in pancreas cancer-bearing mice. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006, 13: 1252-1258. 10.1245/s10434-006-9015-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Kaporis HG, Guttman-Yassky E, Lowes MA, Haider AS, Fuentes-Duculan J, Darabi K, Whynot-Ertelt J, Khatcherian A, Cardinale I, Novitskaya I, Krueger JG, Carucci JA: Human basal cell carcinoma is associated with Foxp3+ T cells in a Th2 dominant microenvironment. J Invest Dermatol. 2007, 127: 2391-2398. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700884.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Sharma S, Yang SC, Zhu L, Reckamp K, Gardner B, Baratelli F, Huang M, Batra RK, Dubinett SM: Tumor cyclooxygenase-2/prostaglandin E2-dependent promotion of FOXP3 expression and CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cell activities in lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 5211-5220. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0141.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Curiel TJ, Coukos G, Zou L, Alvarez X, Cheng P, Mottram P, Evdemon-Hogan M, Conejo-Garcia JR, Zhang L, Burow M, Zhu Y, Wei S, Kryczek I, Daniel B, Gordon A, Myers L, Lackner A, Disis ML, Knutson KL, Chen L, Zou W: Specific recruitment of regulatory T cells in ovarian carcinoma fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival. Nat Med. 2004, 10: 942-949. 10.1038/nm1093.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Tan MC, Goedegebuure PS, Belt BA, Flaherty B, Sankpal N, Gillanders WE, Eberlein TJ, Hsieh CS, Linehan DC: Disruption of CCR5-dependent homing of regulatory T cells inhibits tumor growth in a murine model of pancreatic cancer. J Immunol. 2009, 182: 1746-1755.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Almand B, Resser JR, Lindman B, Nadaf S, Clark JI, Kwon ED, Carbone DP, Gabrilovich DI: Clinical significance of defective dendritic cell differentiation in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6: 1755-1766.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Garrity T, Pandit R, Wright MA, Benefield J, Keni S, Young MR: Increased presence of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood of head and neck cancer patients and their differentiation into dendritic cells. Int J Cancer. 1997, 73: 663-669. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971127)73:5<663::AID-IJC9>3.0.CO;2-V.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Schmielau J, Finn OJ: Activated granulocytes and granulocyte-derived hydrogen peroxide are the underlying mechanism of suppression of t-cell function in advanced cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 4756-4760.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Bluth MJ, Zaba LC, Moussai D, Suarez-Farinas M, Kaporis H, Fan L, Pierson KC, White TR, Pitts-Kiefer A, Fuentes-Duculan J, Guttman-Yassky E, Krueger JG, Lowes MA, Carucci JA: Myeloid dendritic cells from human cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma are poor stimulators of T-cell proliferation. J Invest Dermatol. 2009, 129: 2451-2462. 10.1038/jid.2009.96.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Pak AS, Wright MA, Matthews JP, Collins SL, Petruzzelli GJ, Young MR: Mechanisms of immune suppression in patients with head and neck cancer: presence of CD34+ cells which suppress immune functions within cancers that secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Clin Cancer Res. 1995, 1: 95-103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Young MR, Wright MA, Lozano Y, Matthews JP, Benefield J, Prechel MM: Mechanisms of immune suppression in patients with head and neck cancer: influence on the immune infiltrate of the cancer. Int J Cancer. 1996, 67: 333-338. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960729)67:3<333::AID-IJC5>3.0.CO;2-S.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Young MR, Wright MA, Lozano Y, Prechel MM, Benefield J, Leonetti JP, Collins SL, Petruzzelli GJ: Increased recurrence and metastasis in patients whose primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas secreted granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and contained CD34+ natural suppressor cells. Int J Cancer. 1997, 74: 69-74. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970220)74:1<69::AID-IJC12>3.0.CO;2-D.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  155. Norian LA, Rodriguez PC, O'Mara LA, Zabaleta J, Ochoa AC, Cella M, Allen PM: Tumor-infiltrating regulatory dendritic cells inhibit CD8+ T cell function via L-arginine metabolism. Cancer Res. 2009, 69: 3086-3094. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2826.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Hoechst B, Voigtlaender T, Ormandy L, Gamrekelashvili J, Zhao F, Wedemeyer H, Lehner F, Manns MP, Greten TF, Korangy F: Myeloid derived suppressor cells inhibit natural killer cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma via the NKp30 receptor. Hepatology. 2009, 50: 799-807. 10.1002/hep.23054.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Kusmartsev S, Su Z, Heiser A, Dannull J, Eruslanov E, Kubler H, Yancey D, Dahm P, Vieweg J: Reversal of myeloid cell-mediated immunosuppression in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 8270-8278. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0165.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Zea AH, Rodriguez PC, Atkins MB, Hernandez C, Signoretti S, Zabaleta J, McDermott D, Quiceno D, Youmans A, O'Neill A, Mier J, Ochoa AC: Arginase-producing myeloid suppressor cells in renal cell carcinoma patients: a mechanism of tumor evasion. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 3044-3048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Hoechst B, Ormandy LA, Ballmaier M, Lehner F, Kruger C, Manns MP, Greten TF, Korangy F: A new population of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma patients induces CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells. Gastroenterology. 2008, 135: 234-243. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Du and Wang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.