Open Access

miR-302b is a potential molecular marker of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and functions as a tumor suppressor by targeting ErbB4

Contributed equally
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201433:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-33-10

Received: 8 September 2013

Accepted: 16 January 2014

Published: 19 January 2014

Abstract

Background

ErbB4 expression has been noted in various tumors, but its regulatory mechanism in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether miR-302b regulates the expression of ErbB4 at the post-transcriptional level and to determine its expression, significance, and function in ESCC.

Methods

We used real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction to quantify the expression of miR-302b in 50 ESCC tissues and analyzed its relationship with clinicopathological factors and survival. Then, we investigated the post-transcriptional regulation of ErbB4 expression using immunoblot analysis and luciferase reporter assays. Finally, the effects of miR-302b on proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion of ESCC cells was detected using MTT, flow cytometric analysis, and transwell invasion assays, respectively.

Results

miR-302b was significantly down-regulated and correlated with tumor differentiation and lymph node metastasis in ESCC. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that low miR-302b expression might be a poor prognostic factor. Further studies demonstrated that miR-302b post-transcriptionally down-regulated the expression of ErbB4 in vitro. Moreover, miR-302b inhibited proliferation by inducing apoptosis and repressed invasion in the ESCC cell lines.

Conclusions

miR-302b is a potential molecular marker of ESCC and functions as a tumor suppressor by post-transcriptionally regulating ErbB4.

Keywords

miR-302bErbB4Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly aggressive neoplasm with geographic characteristics and poor prognosis. About one half of all ESCC cases in the world occur in China [1]. Over the past decades, more and more doctors have chosen to focus on the field of molecular targeted therapies [2]. One of the attractive targets in ESCC is the ErbB/HER subfamily, which regulates cellular proliferation, differentiation, and programmed cell death [3]. The ErbB/HER subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases includes four members: EGFR (also known as ErbB1 or HER1), ErbB2 (c-Neu or HER2), ErbB3 (HER3), and ErbB4 (HER4) [4].

A multitude of studies have characterized the expression and significance of the HER family in ESCC [510]. EGFR and ErbB2 have been shown to be overexpressed in ESCCs compared to non-tumor tissues, and these proteins are important markers for the analysis of the prognosis and clinical course of the disease [58]. ErbB3 is also up-regulated in ESCC and correlates with a clinical response to chemotherapy, but it has a limited prognostic value for survival in ESCC [9, 10]. ErbB4 is frequently up-regulated in various cancer tissues [1115], and experimental down-regulation of ErbB4 in different tumor cells suppresses growth [1620]. Xu et al. found that extranuclear ErbB4 had negative effects on the progression of ESCC, whereas the nuclear translocation of ErbB4 exhibited a tumor-promoting property [12]. Pang et al. reported that knockdown of ErbB4 inhibited migration and invasion of the ESCC cell line Eca-109 [16]. However, to our knowledge, the regulatory mechanism of ErbB4 in ESCC is largely unknown.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) represent a class of small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. Currently, emerging results have revealed that miRNAs are involved in cancer pathogenesis and can function as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes [21]. miR-302b is a member of the miR-302 cluster, which regulates the regulatory circuitry controlling ES cell “stemness” [22]. Recently, it was found that the overexpression of miR-302b induced caspase-3-mediated apoptosis of the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line [23].

Since miRNAs predicted to target a gene can be searched by online computational algorithm such as TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_50/) or PicTar (http://pictar.mdc-berlin.de/). TargetScan and PicTar both predicted that ErbB4 is a target gene for miR-302b. Based on these observations, the aim of this study was to detect the expression of miR-302b in ESCC tissues and analyze its correlation with clinicopathological factors or prognosis, as well as to determine the post-transcriptional regulatory relationship between miR-302b and ErbB4. Furthermore, we examined whether manipulating the expression of miR-302b affected ESCC cell behaviors, which could provide a potential molecular therapeutic target for the treatment of human ESCC.

Methods

Patient samples and cell lines

Between January 2009 and December 2010, 60 patients received resection for ESCC at First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School, Xi’an JiaoTong University. Of these, the tumor staging, clinicopathological information, or follow up was incomplete for 10 patients. As a result, 50 patients were retrospectively reviewed. None of these 50 patients received neoadjuvant therapy before operation. Fresh cancer tissues and paired normal adjacent tissues (NAT) were obtained from these patients. The differentiation grade, TNM stage, and lymph node status were classified according to the UICC/AJCC TNM classification (seventh edition). The Institutional Ethics Committee approved this project and written informed consents were obtained from the patients. The ESCC cell lines (Eca109, Ec9706, and TE-1) and esaphagel normal cell line (Het-1A) were obtained from the Cell Bank of Shanghai (China) and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 g/mL streptomycin at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator.

Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) for mature miRNA

qRT-PCR was carried out using the PrimeScript® RT reagent Kit (Perfect Real Time) and a BioRad iQ5 Real-Time PCR Detection System. The reverse transcription reaction was carried out in a 20 μL volume with 1 μg total RNA. The reaction was incubated at 37°C for 15 min, then 85°C for 5 sec; 1 μL of the RT product was used in each PCR. The PCR cycling began with template denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 20 sec, and 72°C for 20 sec. U6 snRNA levels were used for normalization. The following primer sequences were used in this section: (1) ErbB4: random hexamers (RT primers), 5′-AGGAGTGAAATTGGACACAGC-3′ (forward primer for qRT-PCR), and 5′-TCCATCTCGGTATACAAACTGGT-3′ (reverse primer for qRT-PCR); (2) miR-302b: 5′- GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGA TACGACCTACTAA -3′ (RT primer), 5′-GATAAGTGCT TCCATGT-3′ (forward primer for qRT-PCR), and 5′-CAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGT- 3′ (reverse primer for qRT-PCR); (3) U6: 5′-CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT- 3′ (RT primer), 5′-GCT TCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT-3′ (forward primer for qRT-PCR), and 5′-CGCT TCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT-3′ (reverse primer for qRT-PCR). A control reaction without reverse transcriptase was included, and the lack of signal from this reaction ensured that there was no genomic DNA contamination. In addition, the final PCR products were resolved using agarose gel electrophoresis, and a single band of the expected size indicated the specificity of the reaction. The expression levels relative to U6 were calculated using the formula 2-ΔΔCT.

Immunoblot analysis

For immunoblot analyses, 20 μg total proteins were electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to PVDF membrane, blocked, and then incubated with primary antibody. The blots were then incubated with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 h. Then, the membranes were visualized by exposure to X-ray film in dark following a chemiluminescence reaction using the enhanced ECL detection reagents (Amersham, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, England) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Densitometry analysis was performed using the Scion Image software.

Plasmid construction and cell transfection

The sequence of the precursor miR-302b was synthesized and cloned into the pcDNA™6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The ErbB4 3′-UTR target site sequence and the sequence containing the mutation of three bases in the miR-302b target site were synthesized and cloned downstream of the luciferase gene in the pmirGLO luciferase vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). All procedures were performed as previously described [24]. These vectors were named miR-302b, ErbB4-WT, and ErbB4-MT, respectively. All constructs were sequenced. The anti-miR-302b inhibitor (2′–O-methyl antisense oligonucleotide, anti-miR-302b) and the anti-miR-inhibitors-Negative control (2′–O-methyl scrambled miRNA, control) were purchased from AngRang Inc. (Xi’an, China). Cell transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA and protein were prepared 48 h after transfection and were used for qRT-PCR or immunoblot analysis, respectively. The DNA fragment sequences are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Oligonucleotides used for plasmid construction

Name

Sequence

pre-miR-302b-top

5'-AATTCGCTCCCTTCAACTTTAACATGGAAGTGCTTTCTGTGACTTTAAAAGTAAGTGCTTCCATGTTTTAGTAGGAGTA-3'

pre-miR-302b-bottom

5'-AGCTTACTCCTACTAAAACATGGAAGCACTTACTTTTAAAGTCACAGAAAGCACTTCCATGTTAAAGTTGAAGGGAGCG-3'

Erbb4-WT-sense

5'-CGAATTCACTCAGAAATGTAGTTTGCACTTAAGCTGTAATTTTATTTGTTC-3'

Erbb4-WT-antisense

5'-TCGAGAACAAATAAAATTACAGCTTAAGTGCAAACTACATTTCTGAGTGAATTCGAGCT-3'

Erbb4-MT-sense

5'-CGAATTCACTCAGAAATGTAGTTTGGTGTTAAGCTGTAATTTTATTTGTTC-3'

Erbb4-MT-antisense

5'-TCGAGAACAAATAAAATTACAGCTTAACACCAAACTACATTTCTGAGTGAATTCGAGCT-3'

Luciferase assay

The cells were co-transfected with ErbB4-WT or ErbB4-MT and miR-302b or mock (pcDNA™6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR). Luciferase activity was measured 24 h after transfection using the Dual-Glo luciferase assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). All experimental protocols were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The normalized firefly luciferase activity (firefly luciferase activity/Renilla luciferase activity) for each construct was compared to that of the pmirGLO Vector no-insert control.

Cell viability assays

Cell viability was determined using an MTT assay according to the manufacturer’s protocol. pcDNA™6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR (mock) and anti-miR-inhibitors-Negative control (control) were used as the controls for miR-302b and anti-miR-302b, respectively. The absorbance of each well was measured using a multidetection microplate reader (BMG LABTECH, Durham, NC, USA) at a wavelength of 570 nm. All experiments were performed in quadruplicate.

Cell apoptosis assays

Cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in 500 μL binding buffer containing 2.5 μL annexin V-phycoerythrin (PE) and 5 μL 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) to determine the phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure on the outer plasma membrane. After incubation, the samples were analyzed using flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The experiment was repeated three times.

Cell invasion assay

Cell invasion was measured using transwell chambers (Millipore, Billerica, USA) coated with Matrigel. After transfection, the harvested cells were suspended in serum free RPMI 1640 and were added into the upper compartment of the chamber; conditioned RPMI 1640 medium with 20% (v/v) FBS was used as a chemoattractant and placed in the bottom compartment of the chamber. After incubation, the cells were removed from the upper surface of the filter with a cotton swab. The invaded cells were then fixed and stained using 0.1% crystal violet. The cells were quantified from five different fields under a light microscope. The experiment was repeated in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

To investigate the association of miR-302b expression with clinicopathological features and survival, miR-302b expression values were separated into low and high expression groups using the median expression value within the cohort as a cutoff. A Fisher’s exact text was used to analyze the relationship between miR-302b and the various clinicopathological characteristics. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the first day of treatment to the time of disease progression. The survival curves were built according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and the resulting curves were compared using the log-rank test. The joint effect of covariables was examined using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. For other analyses, the data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences between groups were assessed using an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test; P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Expression of miR-302b in ESCC and its significance

We examined the expression of miR-302b in a set of 50 paired samples using qRT-PCR. The results showed that miR-302b was significantly down-regulated in ESCC tissues when compared to the NAT (20 ± 3.42 vs 40 ± 5.24, P < 0.05, Figure 1A). Next, the correlation of miR-302b with the clinicopathological factors was examined. There was a correlation between the miR-302b expression status and the presence of lymph node metastases (Table 2). A low level of miR-302b expression and lymph nodes metastases correlated with a decreased progression-free survival (PFS) according to the Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis with a log rank comparison; the other parameters were not significant (Table 3, Figure 1B). Decreased expression of miR-302b was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (Table 4).
Figure 1

Expression of ErbB4 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A) Relative expression of miR-302b expression levels in 50 surgical specimens of ESCC tissues and matched normal adjacent tissues (NAT) are shown. The data are presented as 2-ΔCT values (*P < 0.05). (B) Patients with high miR-302b expression had a longer progression-free survival compared to patients with low miR-302b expression.

Table 2

Clinicopathologic variables and the expression status of miR-302b

Variables

N

miR-302b

P

Low

High

Age

   

0.168

<65

34

21

13

 

≥65

16

13

3

 

Gender

   

0.863

Male

29

20

9

 

Female

21

14

7

 

Smoking

   

0.301

Yes

37

27

11

 

No

13

7

6

 

Drink

   

0.137

Yes

30

18

12

 

No

20

16

4

 

Differentiation

   

0.010

Well + Moderate

39

23

16

 

Poor

11

11

0

 

TNM stage

   

0.230

I–II

19

11

8

 

III–IV

31

23

8

 

Lymph node status

   

0.001

Metastasis

30

26

4

 

No metastasis

20

8

12

 
Table 3

Univariate analysis for progression free survival

Variables

N

Progression free survival (months)

P

Median ± SE

95% CI

miR-302b

   

0.001

Low

34

12.92 ± 1.03

10.91-14.93

 

High

16

19.82 ± 0.77

18.32-21.33

 

Age

   

0.676

<65

34

17.29 ± 1.23

15.28-19.31

 

≥65

16

17.20 ± 2.63

12.05-22.35

 

Gender

   

0.586

Male

29

17.26 ± 1.08

15.12-19.36

 

Female

21

18.63 ± 1.45

15.78-21.47

 

Smoking

   

0.173

Yes

37

16.37 ± 0.95

14.50-18.24

 

No

13

18.94 ± 1.72

15.56-22.31

 

Drinking

   

0.365

Yes

30

16.89 ± 1.15

14.63-19.15

 

No

20

18.09 ± 1.17

15.80-20.39

 

Differentiation

   

0.108

Well + Moderate

39

17.87 ± 1.00

15.91-19.83

 

Poor

11

14.00 ± 2.54

9.20-18.80

 

TNM stage

   

0.716

I–II

19

18.04 ± 1.22

15.65-20.43

 

III–IV

31

16.79 ± 1.39

14.07-19.51

 

Lymph node

   

0.005

Metastasis

30

14.67 ± 1.35

12.03-17.31

 

No metastasis

20

20.2 ± 0.84

18.56-21.85

 
Table 4

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for progression free survival

Variables

Progression free survival

P

HR

95% CI

miR-302b

   

Low vs high

5.86

1.73-19.84

0.005

Lymph node

   

Metastasis vs no metastasis

1.82

0.67-4.87

0.238

TNM stage

   

III–IV vs I–II

1.25

0.57-2.72

0.583

Differentiation

   

Well + moderate vs poor

0.89

0.31-2.54

0.826

ErbB4 is a target of miR-302b

We first determined the expression levels of ErbB4 protein and miR-302b in three different esophageal cancer cell lines (Eca109, Ec9706, and TE-1) and one esaphagel normal cell line (Het-1A). We found that each cell line expressed higher level of ErbB4 protein and lower level of miR-302b than that in Het-1A (P < 0.05, Figure 2A, B, and C). Further, TE-1 had the highest expression levels of ErbB4 protein but lowest expression levels of miR-302b, while Ec9706 had the highest expression levels of ErbB4 protein but lowest expression levels of miR-302b. Therefore, we analyzed the relationship between the miR-302b expression level and ErbB4 protein expression level in the specimens of the patients. The result demostrated that miR-302b negatively correlated with the ErbB4 protein expression (Figure 2D, P < 0.05, r = −0.725). Then, TE-1 and Ec9706 were chosen for following experiments. After confirming that anti-miR-302b or miR-302b could significantly change the expression level of miR-302b using qRT-PCR, we then tested the effect of miR-302b on the expression of ErbB4 mRNA and protein. The results showed that miR-302b significantly decreased the expression of ErbB4 protein (P < 0.05, Figure 2E and F), but had no effect on mRNA expression (P > 0.05, Figure 2G). We next investigated whether the 3′-UTR of ErbB4 was a functional target of miR-302b in TE-1 cells. After co-transfection of miR-302b with either the ErbB4-wild type or mutated 3′-UTR luciferase reporter vector into TE-1 cells, we found that miR-302b reduced the activity of the luciferase reporter fused to the wild-type ErbB4 3′-UTR by 60%. However, mutation of the 3-nt sequence in the ErbB4 3′-UTR complementary to the miR-302b seed sequence restored the luciferase activity of the miR-302b transfected cells from 60% to 90%, showing that the action of miR-302b on ErbB4 depended on the presence of a single miR-302b cognate binding site within the 3′-UTR (Figure 2H and I).
Figure 2

miR-302b post-transcriptionally regulates ErbB4 expression. (A-B) The expression of ErbB4 protein in ESCC cell lines (Eca109, Ec9706, and TE-1) and esaphagel normal cell line (Het-1A) were analyzed using immunoblot analysis. (C) The expression of miR-302b in three esophageal cancer cell lines and Het-1A were analyzed using RT-PCR. (D) The relationship between the miR-302b expression level and ErbB4 protein expression level in the specimens of the patients were analyzed. (E-F) The effect of miR-302b on ErbB4 protein expression was detected using immunoblot analysis in TE-1 cells. (G) The effect of miR-302b on the mRNA expression of ErbB4 was detected using qRT-PCR in TE-1 cells. (H) Luciferase reporter assay in TE-1 cells. (I) Diagram of the ErbB4 3'-UTR containing reporter constructs. “miR-302b” represents cells transfected with pcDNA™6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR-302b; “control” represents normal ESCC cells; “mock” represents cells transfected with pcDNA™6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR; “ErbB4-MT” and “ErbB4-WT” represent the mutated and wild type luciferase vectors, respectively. *P < 0.05 compared to control or mock respectively.

miR-302b represses cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis

To investigate whether miR-302b modulates cell proliferation in esophageal cancer cells, we assayed its effect on cell proliferation activity. The proliferation activity of TE-1 and Ec9706 cells transfected with anti-miR-302b or miR-302b was determined using an MTT assay. As shown in Figure 3A and B, cells treated with anti-miR-302b had a significant increase in cell viability when compared with the anti-miR-NC transfected cells (P < 0.05). In contrast, overexpression of miR-302b resulted in a decrease in absorbance (P < 0.05). Further experiments demonstrated that this cell proliferation inhibition effect was partly due to the induction of apoptosis (Figure 3C,D and E). These results indicated that ESCC cell growth can be modulated through miR-302b-mediated ErbB4 repression.
Figure 3

Effect of miR-302b on cell proliferation and apoptosis. (A-B) After pcDNA™6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR-302b (miR-302b) or Anti-miR-302b inhibitor (anti-miR-302b) transduction, the growth of TE-1 cells (A) and Ec9706 cells (B) was analyzed at different time points and compared to anti-miR-Inhibitors-Negative Control (control)/pcDNA™6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR (mock) cells using the MTT assay. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of the effect of miR-302b on apoptosis of TE-1 cells. (D-E) Flow cytometric analysis of the effect of miR-302b on the apoptosis of TE-1 cells (D) and Ec9706 cells (E). *P < 0.05 compared with the respective control.

miR-302b regulates cell invasion in vitro

Because there was a correlation between miR-302b and lymph node metastasis, a transwell assay was performed to investigate the role of miR-302b on the invasion of ESCC cells. Overexpression of miR-302b repressed the cell invasion ability of TE-1 cells, while down-regulation of miR-302b expression had contrary results (P < 0.05, Figure 4A and B). The same result was also confirmed in Ec9706 cells. These findings suggest that miR-302b regulates cell invasion of the ESCC cell lines in vitro.
Figure 4

Effect of miR-302b on cell invasion in vitro. (A-B) Cells transfected with the anti-miR-302b inhibitor (anti-miR-302b), anti-miR-Inhibitors-Negative Control (control), pcDNA™6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR-302b (miR-302b), or pcDNA™6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR (mock) were subjected to transwell invasion assays. (C-D) The invasive cell numbers are the average count of five random microscopic fields detected using the transwell invasion assay. A and C: TE-1 cells; B and D: Ec9706 cells. Each bar represents the mean ± SD of the counts. *P < 0.05 compared with the respective control.

Discussion

ErbB4 expression has been noted in various tumors, such as esophagus, colon, prostate, ovary, lung, breast, and thyroid [1215, 2527]. Moreover, recent findings about somatic mutations that activate ErbB4 in metastatic melanoma have started to support a casual role of ErbB4 in carcinogenesis and to support the development of tools [28], such as ErbB4 antibodies, to target ErbB4 in cancer [29]. However, reports about the role of ErbB4 in ESCC are limited.

Previous studies have reported that miRNAs play important roles in gene expression regulation. However, the expression and the regulatory mechanisms of the ErbB4 gene in ESCC have not been reported. Using bioinformatics, ErbB4 was found to be a predicted target of miR-302b. miR-302b is a member of the miR-302 cluster, which is specifically expressed in pluripotent human embryonic stem cells but not in differentiated embryoid bodies or adult tissues [30]. This miR-302 family is also able to reprogram human skin cancer cells into a pluripotent ES cell-like state [22]. It was found that overexpression of miR-302b induced caspase-3-mediated apoptosis in the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line [23]. But, a recent report found that miR-302b is overexpressed in primary human tumors specimens, and the down-regulation of miR-302b effectively decreased tumor cell growth in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients [31].

Our results showed that miR-302b is down-regulated in tumor tissues compared to paired normal adjacent tissues. There were significant correlations between the expression of miR-302b and lymph node metastasis and differentiation. Furthermore, a low expression level of miR-302b was an independent factor that indicated poor prognosis in ESCC patients. This evidence suggests that down-regulation of miR-302b in tumor cells may play roles in the development of ESCC and may have prognostic value.

We then investigated whether ErbB4 could be regulated by miR-302b and the effect that miR-302b had on ESCC cell behaviors. Our study documented that ErbB4 protein expression was negatively regulated by miR-302b both in cell and tissue analysis. The overexpression of miR-302b significantly decreased the ErbB4 protein level but not mRNA level in ESCC cells, indicating the post-transcriptional down-regulation of ErbB4 by miR-302b. Moreover, the overexpression of miR-302b significantly decreased the luciferase activity of pmirGLO that contained the ErbB4 3′-UTR sequence, while it did not decrease the activity of pmirGLO that contained the ErbB4 3′-UTR mutant sequence, indicating that the target site was specific. Furthermore, to reveal the exact role of miR-302b in ESCC, we tested the effect of miR-302b on proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion by up- and down-regulating the expression level of miR-302b. The results suggested that miR-302b acted as a tumor suppressor gene in ESCC by inhibiting proliferation, inducing apoptosis, and repressing invasion. Contrary to our observations, Murray et al. showed that miR-302b was overexpressed in malignant germ cell tumors compared to normal gonad and benign germ cell tumors [32]. But miR-302b function as a tumor suppressor gene both in gastric cancer by targeting EGFR [33]. These results indicate that onco-miRNAs and suppressor-miRNAs can regulate two different roles of the same gene, behaving as oncogenes or tumor suppressors, depending on the tissue type and specific targets [34]. We will carry out further in vivo experiments to confirm the role of miR-302b and its target genes in ESCC.

Conclusions

This was the first study to evaluate the relationship between ErbB4 and miR-302b in ESCC. Our findings demonstrated that ErbB4 was up-regulated in ESCC, and expression of ErbB4 was correlated with tumor differentiation and lymph node metastasis. We found that miR-302b post-transcriptionally down-regulated ErbB4 expression in vitro. We also concluded that miR-302b inhibited proliferation by inducing apoptosis and repressed the invasive ability of ESCC cells, and an ErbB4-mediated pathway may be involved in this function.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81302055), the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT: 1171) and Key Sci-tech Research Project “13115” of Shaanxi Province (2010ZDKG-50).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gastroenterology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University
(2)
Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University
(3)
Department of Radiotherapy, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University
(4)
Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University
(5)
Department of genetics and molecular biology, Medical school, Xi’an Jiaotong University/Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases, Ministry of Education

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS: Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer. 2001, 37: S4-S66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allgayer H, Fulda S: An introduction to molecular targeted therapy of cancer. Adv Med Sci. 2008, 53: 130-138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tew WP, Kelsen DP, Ilson DH: Targeted therapies for esophageal cancer. Oncologist. 2005, 10: 590-601. 10.1634/theoncologist.10-8-590.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wieduwilt MJ, Moasser MM: The epidermal growth factor receptor family: biology driving targeted therapeutics. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008, 65: 1566-1584. 10.1007/s00018-008-7440-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Delektorskaya VV, Chemeris GY, Kononets PV, Grigorchuk AY: Clinical significance of hyperexpression of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR and HER-2) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2009, 148: 241-245. 10.1007/s10517-009-0659-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaneko K, Kumekawa Y, Makino R, Nozawa H, Hirayama Y, Kogo M, Konishi K, Katagiri A, Kubota Y, Muramoto T, Kushima M, Ohmori T, Oyama T, Kagawa N, Ohtsu A, Imawari M: EGFR gene alterations as a prognostic biomarker in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Front Biosci. 2010, 15: 65-72. 10.2741/3607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gotoh M, Takiuchi H, Kawabe S, Ohta S, Kii T, Kuwakado S, Katsu K: Epidermal growth factor receptor is a possible predictor of sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy in the primary lesion of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007, 37: 652-657. 10.1093/jjco/hym089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sato-Kuwabara Y, Neves JI, Fregnani JH, Sallum RA, Soares FA: Evaluation of gene amplification and protein expression of HER-2/neu in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 6-10.1186/1471-2407-9-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Friess H, Fukuda A, Tang WH, Eichenberger A, Furlan N, Zimmermann A, Korc M, Büchler MW: Concomitant analysis of the epidermal growth factor receptor family in esophageal cancer: overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA but not of c-erbB-2 and c-erbB-3. World J Surg. 1999, 23: 1010-1018. 10.1007/s002689900616.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Yamamoto Y, Yamai H, Seike J, Yoshida T, Takechi H, Furukita Y, Kajiura K, Minato T, Bando Y, Tangoku A: Prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor family can be improved by initial chemotherapy with docetaxel, fluorouracil, and cisplatin. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012, 19: 757-765. 10.1245/s10434-011-2071-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gullick WJ: c-erbB-4/HER4: friend or foe?. J Pathol. 2003, 200: 279-281. 10.1002/path.1335.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Xu S, Kitayama J, Yamashita H, Souma D, Nagawa H: Nuclear translocation of HER-4/c-erbB-4 is significantly correlated with prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2008, 97: 44-50. 10.1002/jso.20892.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ljuslinder I, Malmer B, Isaksson-Mettävainio M, Oberg A, Henriksson R, Stenling R, Palmqvist R: ErbB 1–4 expression alterations in primary colorectal cancers and their corresponding metastases. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29: 1489-1494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rickman OB, Vohra PK, Sanyal B, Vrana JA, Aubry MC, Wigle DA, Thomas CF: Analysis of ErbB receptors in pulmonary carcinoid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 3315-3324. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2549.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilmour LM, Macleod KG, McCaig A, Gullick WJ, Smyth JF, Langdon SP: Expression of erbB-4/HER-4 growth factor receptor isoforms in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 2169-2176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pang XG, Fan H, Ge D: Effect of down-regulating HER4 gene on migration and invasion of esophageal carcinoma cell line Eca-109. Fudan Univ J Med. 2008, 35: 521-527.Google Scholar
  17. Hollmén M, Määttä JA, Bald L, Sliwkowski MX, Elenius K: Suppression of breast cancer cell growth by a monoclonal antibody targeting cleavable ErbB4 isoforms. Oncogene. 2009, 28: 1309-1319. 10.1038/onc.2008.481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Puerta-Gil P, García-Baquero R, Jia AY, Ocaña S, Alvarez-Múgica M, Alvarez-Ossorio JL, Cordon-Cardo C, Cava F, Sánchez-Carbayo M: miR-143, miR-222, and miR-452 are useful as tumor stratification and noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for bladder cancer. Am J Pathol. 2012, 180: 1808-1815. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.01.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Starr A, Greif J, Vexler A, Ashkenazy-Voghera M, Gladesh V, Rubin C, Kerber G, Marmor S, Lev-Ari S, Inbar M, Yarden Y, Ben-Yosef R: ErbB4 increases the proliferation potential of human lung cancer cells and its blockage can be used as a target for anti-cancer therapy. Int J Cancer. 2006, 119: 269-274. 10.1002/ijc.21818.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tang CK, Concepcion XZ, Milan M, Gong X, Montgomery E, Lippman ME: Ribozyme-mediated down-regulation of ErbB-4 in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells inhibits proliferation both in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 5315-5322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Guan P, Yin Z, Li X, Wu W, Zhou B: Meta-analysis of human lung cancer microRNA expression profiling studies comparing cancer tissues with normal tissues. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2012, 31: 54-10.1186/1756-9966-31-54.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin SL, Chang DC, Chang-Lin S, Lin CH, Wu DT, Chen DT, Ying SY: Mir-302 reprograms human skin cancer cells into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. RNA. 2008, 14: 2115-2124. 10.1261/rna.1162708.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yadav S, Pandey A, Shukla A, Talwelkar SS, Kumar A, Pant AB, Parmar D: miR-497 and miR-302b regulate ethanol-induced neuronal cell death through BCL2 protein and cyclin D2. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286: 37347-37357. 10.1074/jbc.M111.235531.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zeng Y, Cullen BR: Sequence requirements for micro RNA processing and function in human cells. RNA. 2003, 9: 112-123. 10.1261/rna.2780503.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Merimsky O, Staroselsky A, Inbar M, Schwartz Y, Wigler N, Mann A, Marmor S, Greif J: Correlation between c-erbB-4 receptor expression and response to gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2001, 12: 1127-1131. 10.1023/A:1011665216616.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Srinivasan R, Gillett CE, Barnes DM, Gullick WJ: Nuclear expression of the c-erbB-4/HER-4 growth factor receptor in invasive breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 1483-1487.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Haugen DR, Akslen LA, Varhaug JE, Lillehaug JR: Expression of c-erbB-3 and c-erbB-4 proteins in papillary thyroid carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1996, 56: 1184-1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Prickett TD, Agrawal NS, Wei X, Yates KE, Lin JC, Wunderlich JR, Cronin JC, Cruz P, Rosenberg SA, Samuels Y: Analysis of the tyrosine kinome in melanoma reveals recurrent mutations in ERBB4. Nat Genet. 2009, 41: 1127-1132. 10.1038/ng.438.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurppa K, Elenius K: Mutated ERBB4: a novel drug target in metastatic melanoma?. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2009, 22: 708-710. 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2009.00635.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Suh MR, Lee Y, Kim JY, Kim SK, Moon SH, Lee JY, Cha KY, Chung HM, Yoon HS, Moon SY, Kim VN, Kim KS: Human embryonic stem cells express a unique set of microRNAs. Dev Biol. 2004, 270: 488-498. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.02.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bourguignon LY, Wong G, Earle C, Chen L: Hyaluronan-CD44v3 interaction with Oct4-Sox2-Nanog promotes miR-302 expression leading to self-renewal, clonal formation, and cisplatin resistance in cancer stem cells from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Biol Chem. 2012, 287: 32800-32824. 10.1074/jbc.M111.308528.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Murray MJ, Saini HK, van Dongen S, Palmer RD, Muralidhar B, Pett MR, Piipari M, Thornton CM, Nicholson JC, Enright AJ, Coleman N: The two most common histological subtypes of malignant germ cell tumour are distinguished by global microRNA profiles, associated with differential transcription factor expression. Mol Cancer. 2010, 9: 290-10.1186/1476-4598-9-290.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang L, Yao J, Shi X, Hu L, Li Z, Song T, Huang C: MicroRNA-302b suppresses cell proliferation by targeting EGFR in human hepatocellular carcinoma SMMC-7721 cells. BMC Cancer. 2013, 13: 448-10.1186/1471-2407-13-448.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fabbri M, Ivan M, Cimmino A, Negrini M, Calin GA: Regulatory mechanisms of microRNAs involvement in cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2007, 7: 1009-1019. 10.1517/14712598.7.7.1009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement