Anti-mullerian hormone is expressed by endometriosis tissues and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in endometriosis cells
© Signorile et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 18 April 2014
Accepted: 19 May 2014
Published: 29 May 2014
The anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) is a member of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) superfamily, which is responsible of the regression of the mullerian duct. AMH is expressed in the normal endometrium, where, acting in a paracrine fashion, negatively regulates cellular viability. Our objective was to evaluate the in vitro effects of the treatment with AMH of endometriosic cells.
AMH expression in human endometriosis glands was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. RT-PCR has been used to quantify the expression levels of AMH and AMH RII isoforms, as well as of cytochrome P450 in both endometriosis epithelial and stromal cells Effects of AMH and AMH-cleaved treatment in endometriosis cells were evaluated by flow-cytometry analysis. Finally, it has been evaluated the effect of plasmin-digested AMH on cytochrome P450 activity.
AMH and AMH RII isoforms, as well as cytochrome P450, were expressed in both endometriosis epithelial and stromal cells. Treatment of endometriosis stromal and epithelial cell growth with AMH was able to induce a decrease in the percentage of cells in S phase and increase percentage of cells in G1 and G2 phase; coherently, decreased cell viability and increased percentage of cells death fraction was observed. The plasmin-digested AMH was able to suppress most of the cytochrome P450 activity, causing an increase of pre-G1 phase and of apoptosis induction treating with plasmin-digested AMH in both cell lines, most marked in the epithelial cells.
The data produced suggest a possible use of AMH as therapeutic agents in endometriosis.
Endometriosis is a gynaecological disease defined by the histological presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. Most commonly, endometrial structures are implanted over visceral and peritoneal surfaces, but rarely also in the pericardium, pleura, and even brain. The prevalence in the general female population is 6-10%; in women with pain, infertility or both, the frequency increases to 35-60%. Endometriosis is usually associated with infertility and pelvic pain such as chronic dysmenorrhea, intermestrual abdominal and pelvic pain, back pain, dysuria, dyschezia and dyspareunia. Moreover, it is often associated with a decrease of ovarian reserve and reduction of ovarian volume. Despite the fact that this disease is quite common among women, it is frequently misdiagnosed, the pathogenesis is unknown and the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols are still not fully adequate[1, 3]. Currently, none of the pathogenetic theories proposed, such as retrograde menstruation, coelomic metaplasia or staminal cells, has definitively been proved. Interestingly, our research group has recently demonstrated the presence of endometrial implants outside the uterus in a significant number of female human fetuses, thus demonstrating that alterations in the fine-tuning of the primitive mullerian tube formation is one of the causes of endometriosis[5–9].
The anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) is a homodimeric glycoprotein member of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) superfamily, which is secreted by Sertoli cells in the embryonic testes and is responsible of the regression of the mullerian duct. In the female fetus ovarian granulosa cells begin to secrete low levels of AMH starting from the 32 week of gestation. Levels surge at the time of puberty to approximately 5-8 ng/mL but then gradually decline throughout reproductive life until they become undetectable by menopause. Therefore, AMH levels are considered good indicators of the ovarian reservoir. Recent studies have demonstrated that AMH, as well as AMHRII (one of its receptors), are expressed in the adult female also in the endometrium, where, probably, act in a paracrine fashion and that negatively regulates cellular viability in the endometrium.
Leaving from this background, we decided to deeply investigate the potential role of AMH in regulating cell viability and proliferation of endometriosis cells, taking advantage of an in vitro model of epithelial and stromal endometriosis cells, recently generated in our laboratory.
Patients and tissue samples
Retrospective evaluation was performed on surgical specimens from 30 patients who underwent surgery for infertility, pelvic pain symptoms (including dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia and no-menstrual pain) or adnexal masses between 2009 and 2012 at the “Centro Italiano Endometriosi” in Rome and that were diagnosed with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Representative sections of each specimen were stained with haematoxylin-eosin to confirm the diagnosis of endometriosis. For immunohistochemistry 5-7 μm specimen sections embedded in paraffin, were cut, mounted on glass and dried overnight at 37°C. All sections were then deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through a graded alcohol series and washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). PBS was used for all subsequent washes and for antiserum dilution. Tissue sections were quenched sequentially in 3% hydrogen peroxide in aqueous solution and blocked with PBS-6% non-fat dry milk (Biorad, Hercules, CA, U.S.A.) for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were then incubated at 4°C overnight at 1:100 dilution with a rabbit polyclonal antibody for AMH (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). After three washes in PBS to remove the excess of antiserum, the slides were incubated with diluted goat anti-rabbit biotinylated antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, U.S.A.) at 1:200 dilution in PBS-3% non-fat dry milk (Biorad) for 1 h. All the slides were then processed by the ABC method (Vector Laboratories) for 30 min at room temperature. Diaminobenzidine (Vector Laboratories) was used as the final chromogen and hematoxylin was used as the nuclear counterstain. Negative controls for each tissue section were prepared by leaving out the primary antiserum. All samples were processed under the same conditions. Experiments were performed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and the protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the Fondazione Italiana Endometriosi.
Cell lines and primary cells
Human endometriosis stromal and epithelial cells were described elsewhere. Cells were grown following standard procedures and were propagated in DMEM/F12 (1:1) with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (Gibco, Life Technologies Italia, Monza, Italy), 2 mM L-Glutamine (Euroclone S.p.a, Piero, Italy) and antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 250 ng/mL amphotericin-B).
In vitro treatment with AMH
Cultured human endometrial stromal and epithelial cells were treated with Recombinant Human Mullerian-Inhibiting Substance (rhMIS)/anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) - E-Coli derived (R&D Systems) and Purified recombinant protein of Homo sapiens AMH (OriGene Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA) at three different final concentrations (10-100-1000 ng) for three different time (24-48-72 hrs). Plasmin-cleaved AMH was used instead of the full-length molecule for incubation times indicated. AMH was digested by Plasmin from human plasma (Sigma-Aldrich, Italia) 1 h at 37°C in a ratio of 25 to 1, as described. The effect of AMH on the activity of cytochrome P450 aromatase (CYP19) was measured through the P450-Glo assays (Promega Italia, Milano, Italy).
Experiments were performed in duplicate. Cells were diluted 1:1 in Trypan blue (Sigma-Aldrich, Italia) and counted.
Cell cycle and cell death
Analysis was performed in duplicate. 100.000 cells were re-suspended in the staining solution containing RNAse A, Propidium Iodide (PI) (50 mg/mL), sodium citrate (0.1%), and NP40 (0.1%) in PBS 1X for 30 min in the dark and room temperature. Cell cycle distribution was assessed with an FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson), and 10,000 cells were analyzed by ModFit version 3 Technology (Verity) and Cell Quest (Becton Dickinson).
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Life Technologies) and converted into cDNA using SuperScript VILO kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. (Invitrogen). Converted cDNA was amplified using EuroTaq (Euroclone). Amplified DNA fragments were loaded on 2.0% agarose gel and photographed on a Gel Logic 200 Imaging system UV transilluminator (Kodak). Levels of AMH, AMH type II Receptor (AMHR-II) and CYP19 expression were quantified by Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). Real-Time PCR was performed using iQ_ SYBR_ Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) in a DNA Engine Opticon2 thermal cycler (MJ Research Incorporated). Primers: AMH gene (1) (Forward 5′-CAC CCG CTA CCT GGT GTT AG-3′, Reverse 5′-GGT CAT CCG TGT GAA GCA G-3′). AMH gene (2) (Forward 5′-AAG CTG CTC ATC AGC CTG TC-3′, Reverse 5′-TGG GGT CCG AAT AAA TAT GG-3′). AMHR-II gene (1) (Forward 5′-CCC TGC TAC AGC GAA AGA AC-3′, Reverse 5′-ATG GCA ACC AGT TTT CCT TG-3′). AMHR-II gene (2) (Forward 5′-AAC TGG CCT ATG AGG CAG AA-3′, Reverse 5′-GGT CTG CAT CCC AAC AGT CT-3′). GAPDH gene (Forward 5′-GGA GTC AAC GGA TTT GGT CGT-3′, Reverse 5′-GCT TCC CGT TCT CAG CCT TGA-3′).
Endometriosis is a benign disease of women during reproductive age; nevertheless, it is well known that endometriosic cells display functional properties that are typical of neoplastic cells, such as anti-apoptotic, invasive and metastatic capacities[18, 19]. In support to this observation, epidemiological studies have shown that there exists an increased risk of different types of malignancies, especially ovarian cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in women with endometriosis[20, 21]. Nevertheless, it has been reported an association between endometriosis, dysplastic nevi, melanoma, and breast cancer[22, 23]. Finally, several histological and genetic studies have indicated that endometriosis may transform into cancer or that it could be considered a precursor of cancer. Recently, it has been demonstrated by Wang et al., that adult human endometrium has a functional AMH/AMHRII signal transduction system and that the activation of this system is able to negatively regulate cellular viability in cultured endometrial cells. Indeed, the exact biological role of AMH in adult females is unclear. The most well recognized function in adult is its involvement in recruitment and selection of initial primordial follicles. In fact, there exists a plethora of research articles on the use of AMH serum level as a sensitive marker to assess the ovarian reserve. However, consistently with the work by Wang et al., several papers have shown a part for AMH as a regulator of cell growth in cells and tissues of Mullerian origins, such as endometrial, ovarian, cervical and breast tissues and a role for AMH as potential therapeutic factor in tumors originating from these tissues has been proposed[27–31]. Recently, two independent research groups have demonstrated that the AMH system is active also in endometriosic cells in vitro and that it acts as a negative regulator of cell cycle and cell viability[32, 33].
In this study we have shown that AMH protein is clearly expressed in endometriosis glands in humans; that it is also expressed together with its receptor AMH RII in our in vitro model of endometriosis; and that it is able to inhibit cell proliferation and to induce apoptosis in endometriosis cells, both epithelial and stromal. Several experimental studies have revealed that AMH is strongly activated by cleavage. In fact, the C-terminal fragment contains the conserved TGFβ domain and the cleavage is necessary for efficient receptor binding. Consistent with these observation, it has been reported that the plasmin-digested AMH is more active in cultured human endometrial cell lines. In our experimental setting, we have been able to demonstrate that cleaved AMH is effective in inhibiting cell proliferation in endometriosis cells. Moreover, this cleaved form of AMH is able to inhibit most of the CYP19 activity in endometriosis cells, as it has been already shown for cultured granulosa lutein cells. Several studies have suggested that endometriosis implants are able to produce estrogen de novo from cholesterol. Therefore, endogenous steroidogenic genes in local estradiol biosynthesis in endometriosis are crucial for the survival of these implants. Based on this rationale, it has been recently proposed the use of aromatase inhibitors as a novel treatment of endometriosis. Our experimental data demonstrate, indeed, that AMH treatment is able to inhibit CYP19 activity, that is the key enzyme in humans for the conversion of C19 steroids to estrogens, thus suggesting a possible biological explanation of the effects of this hormone on cell growth and apoptosis.
The clinical and therapeutic implications of this observation are straightforward. In fact, all current endometriosis treatments, including surgical and medical strategies, have high recurrence rates of up to 45%. The data produced suggest a possible use of AMH as therapeutic agents in endometriosis. Additional functional studies both in vitro and in vivo are necessary in order to define applicable therapeutic modalities.
- Bulun SE: Endometriosis. New Engl J Med. 2009, 360: 268-279. 10.1056/NEJMra0804690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cramer DW, Missmer SA: The epidemiology of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 955: 11-22. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02761.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baldi A, Campioni M, Signorile PG: Endometriosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy and association with cancer. Oncol Rep. 2008, 19: 843-846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Signorile PG, Spugnini EP, Citro G, Viceconte R, Vincenzi B, Baldi F, Baldi A: Endocrine disruptors in utero cause ovarian damages linked to endometriosis. Front Biosci. 2012, 4: 1724-1730.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Signorile PG, Baldi F, Bussani R, D’Armiento M, De Falco M, Baldi A: Ectopic endometrium in human foetuses is a common event and sustains the theory of mullerianosis in the pathogenesis of endometriosis, a disease that predisposes to cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 28: 49-10.1186/1756-9966-28-49.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Signorile PG, Baldi F, Bussani R, D’Armiento M, De Falco M, Boccellino M, Quagliuolo L, Baldi A: New evidences sustaining the presence of endometriosis in the human foetus. RBM online. 2010, 21: 142-147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Signorile PG, Baldi F, Bussani R, Viceconte R, Bulzomi P, D’Armiento M, D’Avino A, Baldi A: Embryologic origin of endometriosis: analysis of 101 human female foetuses. J Cell Physiol. 2012, 227: 1653-1656. 10.1002/jcp.22888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Signorile PG, Baldi A: Endometriosis: new concepts in the pathogenesis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010, 42: 778-780. 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.03.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crispi S, Piccolo MT, D’Avino A, Donizetti A, Viceconte R, Spyrou M, Calogero RA, Baldi A, Signorile PG: Transcriptional profiling of endometriosis tissues identifies genes related to organogenesis defects. J Cell Physiol. 2013, 228: 1927-1934. 10.1002/jcp.24358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- La Marca A, Broekmans FJ, Volpe A, Fauser BC, Macklon NS, ESHRE Special Interest Group for Reproductive Endocrinology–AMH Round Table: Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know?. Hum Reproduct. 2009, 24: 2264-2275. 10.1093/humrep/dep210.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tal R, Seifer DB: Potential mechanisms for racial and ethnic differences in antimüllerian hormone and ovarian reserve. Int J Endocrinol. 2013, 2013: 818912-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Dicken C, Lustbader JW, Tortoriello DV: Evidence for a Mullerian-inhibiting substance autocrine/paracrine system in adult human endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2009, 91: 1195-1203. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boccellino M, Quagliuolo L, Verde A, La Porta R, Crispi S, Piccolo MT, Vitiello A, Baldi A, Signorile PG: In vitro model of stromal and epithelial immortalized endometriotic cells. J Cell Biochem. 2012, 113: 1292-1301. 10.1002/jcb.24000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pepinsky RB, Sinclair LK, Chow EP, Mattaliano RJ, Manganaro TF, Donahoe PK, Cate RL: Proteolytic processing of mullerian inhibiting substance produces a transforming growth factor-beta-like fragment. J Biol Chem. 1988, 263: 18961-18964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grossman MP, Nakajima ST, Fallat ME, Siow Y: Mullerian-inhibiting substance inhibits cytochrome P450 aromatase activity in human granulosa lutein cell culture. Fertil Steril. 2008, 89: 1364-1370. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nebbioso A, Clarke N, Voltz E, Germain E, Ambrosino C, Bontempo P, Alvarez R, Schiavone EM, Ferrara F, Bresciani F, Weisz A, de Lera AR, Gronemeyer H, Altucci L: Tumor-selective action of HDAC inhibitors involves TRAIL induction in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Nat Med. 2005, 11: 77-84. 10.1038/nm1161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giudice LC, Kao LC: Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004, 364: 1789-1799. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruner-Tran KL, Osteen KG, Taylor HS, Sokalska A, Haines K, Duleba AJ: Resveratrol inhibits development of experimental endometriosis in vivo and reduces endometrial stromal cell invasiveness in vitro. Biol Reprod. 2011, 84: 106-112. 10.1095/biolreprod.110.086744.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pitsos M, Kanakas N: The role of matrix metalloproteinases in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2009, 16: 717-726. 10.1177/1933719109333661.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nezhat FR, Pejovic T, Reis FM, Guo SW: The link between endometriosis and ovarian cancer: clinical implications. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014, 24: 623-628. 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melin A, Sparen P, Bergqvist A: Endometriosis and the risk of cancer with special emphasis on ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod. 2006, 21: 1237-1242. 10.1093/humrep/dei462.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hornstein MD, Thomas PP, Sober AJ, Wyshak G, Albright NL, Frisch RE: Association between endometriosis, dysplastic nevi and history of melanoma in women of reproductive age. Human Reprod. 1997, 1997 (12): 143-145.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bertelsen L, Mellemkjer L, Frederiksen K, Kyer SK, Brinton LA, Sakoda LC, van Valkengoed I, Olsen JH: Risk for breast cancer among women with endometriosis. Int J Cancer. 2007, 120: 1372-1375. 10.1002/ijc.22490.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varma R, Rollason T, Gupta JK, Maher ER: Endometriosis and the neoplastic process. Reproduction. 2004, 127: 293-304. 10.1530/rep.1.00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Durlinger ALL, Gruijters MJG, Kramer P, Karels B, Ingraham HA, Nachtigal MW, Uilenbroek JT, Grootegoed JA, Themmen AP: Anti-Mullerian hormone inhibits initiation of primordial follicle growth in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology. 2002, 143: 3836-3844.Google Scholar
- Visser JA, Schipper I, Laven JS, Themmen AP: Anti-Müllerian hormone: an ovarian reserve marker in primary ovarian insufficiency. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012, 8: 331-341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renaud EJ, MacLaughlin DT, Oliva E, Rueda BR, Donahoe PK: Endometrial cancer is a receptor-mediated target for Mullerian inihibiting substance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 111-116. 10.1073/pnas.0407772101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stephen AE, Pearsall LA, Christian BP, Donahoe PK, Vacanti JP, MacLaughlin DT: Highly purified müllerian inhibiting substance inhibits human ovarian cancer in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2002, 8: 2640-2646.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wei X, Dombkowski D, Meirelles K, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Szotek PP, Chang HL, Preffer FI, Mueller PR, Teixeira J, MacLaughlin DT, Donahoe PK: Mullerian inhibiting substance preferentially inhibits stem/progenitors in human ovarian cancer cell lines compared with chemotherapeutics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 18874-18879. 10.1073/pnas.1012667107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang HL, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Nicolaou F, Li X, Wei X, MacLaughlin DT, Donahoe PK: Mullerian inhibiting substance inhibits invasion and migration of epithelial cancer cell lines. Gynecol Oncol. 2011, 120: 128-134. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.09.017.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bakkum-Gamez JN, Aletti G, Lewis KA, Keeney GL, Thomas BM, Navarro-Teulon I, Cliby WA: Mullerian inhibiting substance tyoe II receptor (MISIIR): a novel tissue-specific target expressed by gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2008, 108: 141-148. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Namkung J, Song JY, Jo HH, Kim MR, Lew YO, Donahoe PK, MacLaughlin DT, Kim JH: Mullerian inhibiting substance induces apoptosis of human endometrial stromal cells in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012, 97: 3224-3230. 10.1210/jc.2012-1538.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borahay MA, Lu F, Ozpolat B, Tekedereli I, Gurates B, Karipcin S, Kilic GS: Mullerian inhibiting substance suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis and autophagy in endometriosis cells in vitro. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2013, 2013: 361489-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pépin D, Hoang M, Nicolaou F, Hendren K, Benedict LA, Al-Moujahed A, Sosulski A, Marmalidou A, Vavvas D, Donahoe PK: An albumin leader sequence coupled with a cleavage site modification enhances the yield of recombinant C-terminal Mullerian Inhibiting Substance. Technology. 2013, 1: 63-71. 10.1142/S2339547813500076.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rey R, Lukas-Croisier C, Lasala C, Bedecarrás P: AMH/MIS: what we know already about the gene, the protein and its regulation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003, 211: 21-31. 10.1016/j.mce.2003.09.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- di Clemente N, Jamin SP, Lugovskoy A, Carmillo P, Ehrenfels C, Picard JY, Whitty A, Josso N, Pepinsky RB, Cate RL: Processing of anti-mullerian hormone regulates receptor activation by a mechanism distinct from TGF-β. Mol Endocrinol. 2010, 24: 2193-2206. 10.1210/me.2010-0273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Attar E, Bulun SE: Aromatase and other steroidogenic genes in endometriosis: translational aspects. Hum Reprod Update. 2006, 12: 49-56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simpson ER, Clyne C, Rubin G, Boon WC, Robertson K, Britt K, Speed C, Jones M: Aromatase—a brief overview. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002, 64: 93-127. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.081601.142703.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.