Open Access

Antitumor activity of selective MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 in combination with PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC xenograft models

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201433:52

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-33-52

Received: 23 May 2014

Accepted: 2 June 2014

Published: 17 June 2014

Abstract

Purpose

Although the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) gefitinib have shown dramatic effects against EGFR mutant lung cancer, patients become resistant by various mechanisms, including gatekeeper EGFR-T790M mutation, MET amplification, and KRAS mutation, thereafter relapsing. AZD6244 is a potent, selective, and orally available MEK1/2 inhibitor. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of AZD6244 alone or with BEZ235, an orally available potent inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase (PI3K) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), in gefitinib-resistant non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) models.

Experimental design

NCI-H1975 with EGFR-T790M mutation, NCI-H1993 with MET amplification and NCI-H460 with KRAS/PIK3CA mutation human NSCLC cells were subcutaneous injected into the athymic nude mice respectively. Mice were randomly assigned to treatment with AZD6244, BEZ235, AZD6244 plus BEZ235, or control for 3 weeks, then all mice were sacrificed and tumor tissues were subjected to western blot analyses and immunohistochemical staining.

Results

AZD6244 could inhibit the tumor growth of NCI-H1993, but slightly inhibit the tumor growth of NCI-1975 and NCI-H460. Combining AZD6244 with BEZ235 markedly enhanced their antitumor effects and without any marked adverse events. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemical staining revealed that AZD6244 alone reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, angiogenesis, and tumor cell proliferation. Moreover, MEK1/2 inhibition resulted in decreased AKT phosphorylation in NCI-H1993 tumor model. BEZ235 also inhibited AKT phosphorylation as well as their downstream molecules in all three tumor models. The antiangiogenic effects were substantially enhanced when the agents were combined, which may due to the reduced expression of matrix metallopeptidase-9 in tumor tissues (MMP-9).

Conclusions

In this study, we evaluated therapy directed against MEK and PI3K/mTOR in distinct gefitinib-resistant NSCLC xenograft models. Combining AZD6244 with BEZ235 enhanced their antitumor and antiangiogenic effects. We concluded that the combination of a selective MEK inhibitor and a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor was effective in suppressing the growth of gefitinib-resistant tumors caused by EGFR T790M mutation, MET amplification, and KRAS/PIK3CA mutation. This new therapeutic strategy may be a practical approach in the treatment of these patients.

Keywords

AZD6244 BEZ235 Tyrosine kinase inhibitor Non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in many countries, including the China [1]. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for up to 80% of all lung cancer cases; patients typically present with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. The prognosis of patients with advanced lung cancer remains poor, and recent studies show that conventional therapies may have reached a therapeutic plateau as evidenced by the 5-year survival rate for NSCLCs, which remains at 15% [2, 3]. The EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib have shown marked therapeutic effects against NSCLCs with EGFR activating mutations, such as exon 19 deletions and L858R point mutations [4]. Almost all tumors, however, acquire resistance to EGFR-TKIs after varying periods of time. Common mechanisms for acquired resistance include emergence of an EGFR gatekeeper mutation (T790M) and MET gene amplification [5, 6]. In addition, PIK3CA mutations as well as KRAS mutations have been found to contribute to EGFR-TKIs resistance in a subpopulation of tumors [7, 8]. The limited therapeutic options currently available for patients with advanced lung cancer create a pressing need to identify new therapeutic strategy.

Selumetinib (AZD6244) is an oral, non-ATP competitive inhibitor and highly specific for extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK)1/2, a key enzyme in the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. AZD6244 had minimal effects on the p38, c-Jun-NH2-kinase, PI3K, and MEK5/ERK5 pathways and is currently in phase II clinical trial in KRAS-mutant NSCLC [9, 10]. In vivo, AZD6244 could inhibit the tumor growth in HT-29 xenograft model, which is a colorectal tumor model carrying a BRAF mutation, at a dose of 100 mg/kg and the tumor growth inhibition of AZD6244 is better than gemcitabine [11]. However, the inhibition of MEK signaling alone may not be sufficient in patients with gefitinib-resistant NSCLC, and negative feedback mechanisms in PI3K pathway may be problematic when it is used alone [12]. By contrast, combined blockade of both pathways was able to overcome the reciprocal pathway activation induced by inhibitor-mediated release of negative feedback loops and resulted in a significant tumor growth inhibition. Thus, coinhibition of both pathways has shown use in reducing tumor growth in a variety of xenograft models [13, 14], and clinical trials of such combinations are under way in adults.

BEZ235 is an orally available dual inhibitor of PI3K and mTOR that is being evaluated in phase I/II trials [15]. With the aim of developing effective therapeutic strategy for treatment gefitinib-resistant NSCLCs, we have initially evaluated the antitumor activity of AZD6244 alone or combination with BEZ235 in a panel of three human NSCLC cell lines, which were selected according to their different mutation status for EGFR- T790M, MET and KRAS/PIK3CA genes. We hypothesized that targeting the MEK pathway in combination with selective inhibitors of PI3K/mTOR signaling, could overcome gefitinib-resistant NSCLC and enhance the antitumor efficacy.

Methods

Reagents

AZD6244 and BEZ235 were purchased from Sellech Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA), all drugs were dissolved in sterile dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and a 10 mM working solution was prepared and stored in aliquots at -22°C. Working concentrations were diluted in culture medium just before each experiment. RPMI1640 media and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Fibronectin and 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Phospho-AKT (Ser473, p-AKT), phospho-S6 (Ser240/244, p-S6), phospho-4E-BP1 (Ser 65, p-4E-BP1), phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204, p-ERK1/2), phospho-MEK1/2 (Ser217/221, p-MEK1/2), AKT, S6, 4E-BP1, MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). CD31 and Ki-67 antibodies for IHC were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). All other chemicals used in this study were of analytical reagent grade.

Cell lines

The NCI-H1975 EGFR T790M mutation [16], NCI-H460 KRAS/PIK3CA mutation and NCI-H1993 MET amplification [17, 18] human NSCLC cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 mg/L streptomycin, 100 IU/mL penicillin and 0.03% L-glutamine (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) and maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.

Cell viability assay

Cell viability was measured using the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium] dye reduction method. Tumor cells (1 × 104 cells/100 mL/well) in RPMI1640 medium with 10% FBS were plated into 96-well plates and cultured with indicated compounds for 72 h, followed by the addition of 50 mL of MTT solution (2 mg/mL; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to each well and further incubation for 2 h. The medium was removed, and the dark blue crystals in each well were dissolved in 100 mL dimethyl sulfoxide. The absorbance of the wells was measured with a microplate reader at test and reference wavelengths of 490 nm, respectively. Percent growth was reported relative to untreated controls. Each experiment contained at least triplicate samples and was performed at least three times.

Efficacy study in vivo

BALB/C nude mice (female, 6-7 weeks old) were obtained from Vital River (Beijing, China). Mice were maintained under super pathogen-free conditions and housed in barrier facilities on a 12-h light/dark cycle, with food and water ad libitum. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Shandong University Experimental Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were injected subcutaneous (s.c.) with 5 × 106 NCI-H1993, NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 cells that had been resuspended in 200 μL of matrigel (BD Biosciences, Milan, IT). AZD6244, solubilized in a methocel/polysorbate buffer, was injected by oral gavage twice daily at the dose of 25 mg/kg for 3 weeks [19]. BEZ235, was reconstituted in NMP (1-methyl-2 pyrrolidone) and PEG300, and injected by oral gavage once daily at the dose of 20 mg/kg for 3 weeks [20]. When the mean volumes of tumors were between 150 and 200 mm3, mice were randomly divided in four groups (ten mice per group). The tumor volume and body weight in each group were balanced. The animals were ear-punched for identification during the study. Two orthogonal diameters of the tumor are measured with digital vernier calipers and individual animal weights were weighed and recorded twice a week. Tumor volume (TV) are measured and recorded during treatment period by the formula: TV = Length × Width2/2. Growth inhibition from the start of treatment was assessed by comparison of the differences in tumor volume between control and treated groups. Tumor growth inhibition T/C ratio is calculated by the following equations: T/C ratio = (Vt - V0)Compound treated/(Vt - V0)Control × 100 %.

Western blot analysis

The expressions of, p-ERK1/2, p-AKT, p-S6, p-MEK1/2 and p-4E-BP1 in tumor tissues were examined by Western Blotting. Fresh tumors in each group were resected after last treatment with AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 for 2 h on Day 21 of the efficacy study. Tumor tissues were lysed by lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0], 100 mM NaF, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 μg/mL aprotinin, 50 μg/mL leupeptin, and 1 μg/mL pepstatin A). The resected tumor samples were homogenized with lysis buffer containing 25 mM b-glycerophosphate and 0.5% (v / v) phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 2 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 4°C. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 17 860 g for 20 min at 4°C. Aliquots of the supernatants containing 5–20 μg of protein were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The protein concentration of the supernatant was determined by Bio-Rad protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). Equal amounts of protein were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamidegel electrophoresis (SDS/PAGE) on 10% gels, blotted on polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), and probed with p-ERK1/2, p-AKT, p-S6, p-MEK1/2, p-4E-BP1, MMP2, MMP9, ERK1/2, AKT, S6, MEK1/2 and 4E-BP1 rabbit monoclonal antibody and subsequently with goatanti-rabbit (HRP), and detected by chemiluminescence. To measure protein loading, antibodies directed against β-actin were used.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Fresh tumors in each group were resected after last treatment with AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 for 2 h on Day 21 of the efficacy study, fixing in formalin and embedding the tumor tissue. Cutting and mounting the section. Immunocytochemical analysis was performed according to the method described on the commercial kits to examine the expressions of CD31 and Ki-67 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA).

Caspase activity assay

The apoptotic markers, activity of caspase-3,-8 and -9 were measured by using caspase colorimetric protease kits (Abnova, Walnut, CA, USA). Fresh tumors in each group were resected after last treatment with AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 for 2 h on Day 21 of the efficacy study, and then tumor lysis containing 200 μg of protein was incubated with 5 μL of 4 mM p NA-conjugated substrate (DEVD-p NA, IETD-p NA and LEHD-p NA) at 37°C for 2 h. The amount of p NA released was measured at 405 nm using a microplate reader.

Statistical analysis of the data

All results and data were confirmed in at least three separate experiments. Data are expressed as means ± SD, and were analyzed by ANOVA using Statistics Package for Social Science (SPSS) software (version 13.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Test article can be demonstrated as an effective compound until T/C ratio ≤ 42% and a value of P < 0.05 was indicated to be statistically significance on tumor volume calculation.

Results

Effect of AZD6244 and BEZ235 on viability of gefitinib-resistant NSCLC in vitro

Before evaluating the effect of AZD6244, BEZ235 and AZD6244 plus BEZ235 treatment on gefitinib-resistant NSCLC xenograft models in nude mice, the sensitivity of cell lines to compounds was evaluated in vitro. Cell proliferation was analyzed by MTT assay in cells treated with 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μM of AZD6244 or BEZ235 for 72 h. The results showed that AZD6244 significantly suppressed the growth of NCI-H1993 with a low micromolar IC50 value of 5.6 μM (Figure 1A). Moreover, AZD6244 alone mildly inhibited cell growth with IC50 values of 37.5 μM and 26.8 μM in NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 cells, respectively (Figure 1A). BEZ235 alone also suppressed the growth of three cell lines with slightly high IC50 values of 23.5, 67.8 and 16.8 μM in NCI-H1993, NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 cells, respectively (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Anti-proliferative effects of AZD6244 and BEZ235 in NCI-H1993, NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 gefitinib-resistant cell lines. Cells were treated with varying concentrations of AZD6244 (A) or BEZ235 (B) alone for 72 h. Doses ranged from 0.01 μM to 100 μM. Mean ± SD, n = 5.

Concurrent inhibition of MEK and PI3K/mTOR has a synergistic effect on gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cell lines growth in vitro

The anti-proliferative effect of combining a MEK and PI3K/mTOR inhibitor was measured in NCI-H1993, NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 cells by calculating the combination index (CI) according to the Chou-Talalay method [21] using a fixed dose ratio. Both AZD6244 and BEZ235 were introduced to cell cultures at 0.25×, 0.5×, 1×, 2× and 4× their respective IC50s in NCI-H1993, NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 cell lines for 72 h. Cell growth in all cell lines was markedly decreased following combination treatment at multiple paired concentrations when compared with either single agent alone. The cells viability data were processed to get the CI under the corresponding effective dose (ED) in NCI-H1993, NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 cell lines (Figure 2) by CalcuSyn software. For the NCI-H1993 cell line the following CI value was obtained: 0.4101 (ED50). For NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 cell line the CI values were 0.02052 (ED50), and 0.0440 (ED50) respectively. The CI results suggested that AZD6244 and BEZ235 worked synergistically to produce an anti-proliferative effect in NCI-H1993, NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 cell lines (Figures 2A-C).
Figure 2

Synergistic effects of AZD6244-BEZ235 combination therapy on cell viability. NCI-H1993 (A), NCI-H1975 (B) and NCI-H460 (C) cells were treated with AZD6244 alone, BEZ235 alone or AZD6244-BEZ235 in combination for 72 h. Results were analyzed according to the Chou-Talalay method [19]. The combination index (CI) values were calculated by using CalcuSyn software. Mean ± SD, n = 5.

Tumor growth inhibition effect of MEK and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC tumor models

In order to investigate tumor growth inhibition effect of AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 in vivo, we used AZD6244, BEZ235, and AZD6244 plus BEZ235 to treat NCI-H1993, NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 subcutaneous tumor models respectively for 3 weeks. As shown in Figure 3A-C, treatment with AZD6244 for 3 weeks was able to inhibit tumor growth of NCI-H1993 (T/C value 40%), but slightly inhibit tumor growth in both NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 subcutaneous tumor models (T/C values 60% and 65%), whereas BEZ235 treatment caused an approximately 50% reduction in tumor growth in all three subcutaneous tumor models. In contrast, the combined treatments with the two drugs almost completely inhibited NCI-H1993, NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 tumor growth at the end of the 3 weeks of therapy (Figure 3A-D). Single agent and combination treatment protocols were well tolerated by mice, with no weight loss or other signs of acute or delayed toxicity (Figure 4A-C).
Figure 3

Antitumor activity of AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 in mouse xenograft models of human tumors. Nude mice-bearing NCI-H1993 (A), NCI-H1975 (B), and NCI-H460 (C) tumors were administered 25 mg/kg AZD6244 twice daily and/or 20 mg/kg BEZ235 once daily up to 21 days. Tumors were resected from nude mice on day 21 (D). Tumor volume was measured using calipers on the indicated days. Mean ± SD, n = 10. *, P < 0.05 vs control group. **, P < 0.01 vs control group.

Figure 4

Changes in body weight of mice treated with control group or AZD6244 and/or BEZ235. Nude mice-bearing NCI-H1993 (A), NCI-H1975 (B), and NCI-H460 (C) tumors were administered 25 mg/kg AZD6244 twice daily and/or 20 mg/kg BEZ235 once daily up to 21 days. Body weight was measured on the indicated days. Mean ± SD, n = 10.

Effect of MEK and PIK3/mTOR inhibitors on signaling transduction pathways in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC tumor models

To assess the impact of both compounds on downstream molecules of the MEK and PI3K pathways, we used Western blot analysis to observe phosphorylation status and total protein expression in tumor tissues. The results showed that p-MEK1/2, p-ERK1/2, p-AKT, p-S6 and p-4E-BP1 appeared to be inhibited by AZD6244 and BEZ235 combination treatment, whereas the total protein levels of MEK1/2, ERK1/2, AKT, S6 and 4E-BP1 remained unchanged in each tumor model (Figure 5). Western blot analysis of downstream signals also showed treatment with AZD6244 or BEZ235 inhibited the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 or AKT in all three tumor models respectively. In addition, combined treatment with AZD6244 and BEZ235 showed greater inhibition of p-ERK1/2 and p-AKT than observed in control group or mice treated with each compound alone in vivo (Figure 5). Interestingly, the impact from both inhibitors on p-S6 and p-4E-BP1 levels was, alternatively, tumor model specific. For example, AZD6244 and BEZ235 alone and in combination markedly inhibited p-S6 and p-4E-BP1 expression levels in NCI-H1993 tumor models, compared with the minimal suppression observed in NCI-H460 tumor model (Figure 5). Neither AZD6244 nor BEZ235 alone suppressed p-S6 and p-4E-BP1 in NCI-H1975 tumor model. We also found that the expression of MMP-9 was significantly inhibited by AZD6244 and BEZ235 combination treatment, whereas the expression of MMP-2 was not affected by the treatment.
Figure 5

Effects of AZD6244-BEZ235 combination therapy on PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK pathways. All three gefitinib-resistant tumor xenograft models were treated with the AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 for 2 h on Day 21 of the efficacy study, tumor tissues were then harvested to detect p-AKT (S473)/AKT, p-ERK (T202/Y204)/ERK, p-S6 (S240/244)/S6 and p-4E-BP1 (S65)/4E-BP1.

Effect of MEK and PIK3/mTOR inhibitors on the expressions of Ki-67 and CD31 in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC tumor models

To characterize the mechanism of tumor growth inhibition observed in our gefitinib-resistant NSCLC tumor models by AZD6244 and BEZ235, lung tumor tissues were assessed by evaluating Ki-67 expression using immunohistochemical analyses. We observed active cell proliferation in NCI-H1993 tumor model, with a 56% proliferation index (Figure 6A). Monotherapy with AZD6244 or BEZ235 slightly decreased the percentage of Ki-67-positive proliferating tumor tissues, with proliferation indices of 42% and 39%, respectively (Figure 6A). Combined treatment with AZD6244 and BEZ235 markedly decreased the percentage of Ki-67-positive proliferating tumor tissues to 10%, consistent with the marked inhibition of ERK1/2 and AKT phosphorylation. We also found the similar results in NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 tumor models (Figure 6A).To evaluate the potential antiangiogenic mechanism of AZD6244 and BEZ235, gefitinib-resistant NSCLC tumor tissues were analyzed by immunostaining for CD31 (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1). The results showed BEZ235 significantly decreased the vascular density of all three gefitinib-resistant NSCLC tumors, whereas AZD6244 monotherapy had only a mildly effect upon lung tumor angiogenesis. The antiangiogenic effects AZD6244 and BEZ235 were markedly increased when they were combined (Figure 6B).
Figure 6

Effects of AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 on the expressions of Ki-67 (A) and CD31 (B) in NCI-1993, NCI-1975 and NCI-H460 xenograft models. All three gefitinib-resistant tumor xenograft models were treated with the AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 for 2 h on Day 21 of the efficacy study, tumor tissues in each group were resected and immunostained with anti-Ki67 and anti-CD31 antibodies. N = 10, *, P < 0.05 vs vehicle group. **, P < 0.01 vs vehicle group.

MEK and PIK3/mTOR inhibitors had no effect on caspase-3, 8 and 9 activities in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC tumor models

In order to investigate whether AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 would induce apoptosis in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC tumor models, activity of caspase-3, 8 and 9 were measured by the colorimetric assay. The results showed that AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 had no effect on caspase-3, 8 and 9 activities in all three gefitinib-resistant NSCLC tumor models (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Effects of AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 on the activities of caspase-3, 8 and 9 in NCI-1993, NCI-1975 and NCI-H460 xenograft models. All three gefitinib-resistant tumor xenograft models were treated with the AZD6244 and/or BEZ235 for 2 h on Day 21 of the efficacy study, tumor tissues in each group were resected and measured by caspase colorimetric protease kits. N = 10.

Discussion

Although advances have been made in cancer treatment with the development of selective molecular targeted therapies, several relevant issues for their optimal and effective use remain unsolved. Recent studies have demonstrated that the EGFR-TKI gefitinib and erlotinib are associated with a high response rate and prolong progression-free survival in patients with EGFR mutant lung cancer [22]. Responders to these agents, however, later relapse after acquiring EGFR-TKI resistance, making it urgent to develop novel therapeutic agents that can overcome acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI. Current clinical approaches to combat resistance in lung adenocarcinoma include irreversible and mutant-selective inhibitors of EGFR, combination of cetuximab and afatinib [23] and combination of an EGFR inhibitor with a drug targeting a resistance pathway, such as the combination of gefitinib and a MET inhibitor [24]. However, alternative RTK pathways that are activated following EGFR inhibition are another area for investigation. These alternative pathways may bypass or evade inhibition of EGFR signaling, thereby enabling combinations of agents to simultaneously attack multiple molecular targets for cancer growth inhibition. One potential solution to overcome multiple mechanisms of resistance is to target downstream pathways. In this study, we show that the combination of a selective MEK inhibitor and a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor is effective against tumor cell lines refractory to gefitinib by three different mechanisms: an EGFR gatekeeper T790M mutation, MET amplification, and KRAS/PIK3CA mutation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the effects of MEK TKI with PI3K/mTOR TKI therapy in gefitinib-resistant models of NSCLC.

MEK is a potentially relevant molecular therapeutic target since it is the activated downstream of the axis RAS/RAF proteins and in turn activates ERK to induce cell proliferation. Therefore, several selective MEK inhibitors have been developed [25] and more than ten MEK inhibitors have entered early clinical trial evaluation [26]. Unfortunately, clinical activity as single agent has been rarely observed with MEK inhibitors in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC patients [27]. The benefit of blocking an individual pathway has been largely limited by the presence of a compensatory feedback loop between PI3K and MEK. For example, inhibition of the MEK pathway results in activation of the PI3K pathway [28], and PI3K activation mediates resistance to MEK inhibition [29]. In our study, in order to circumvent this compensatory feedback, concurrent blockade of the two pathways has been tested, and synergy in antitumor effects was detected, providing the rationale for phase I clinical trials. Moreover, early signs of clinical benefit have been reported in advanced cancer by a retrospective analysis on patients receiving agents that target both pathways [30].

Gatekeeper mutations, the T790M mutation in EGFR associated with resistance to gefitinib [31], are common mechanisms by which tumor cells acquire resistance to molecularly targeted drugs. Although irreversible EGFR-TKIs, including BIBW2992, have been developed to overcome T790M-mediated resistance to gefitinib [32], recent clinical trials have failed to show that monotherapy with irreversible EGFR-TKIs has benefits in patients with NSCLC refractory to gefitinib [33]. This may be due, at least in part, to the low selectivity of this class of compounds to wild-type and mutant EGFR. In addition, because HGF overexpression was frequently observed in tumors with the gatekeeper T790M mutation [34], monotherapy with a mutant-selective EGFR-TKI may not be sufficient to inhibit the growth of tumors with acquired resistance to gefitinib. Our findings suggest that the combination of a MEK-TKI and a PIK3/mTOR-TKI may be effective in controlling these resistant tumors.

Many KRAS-mutant cancer cells have been shown to be sensitive to MEK inhibitors, [35] and KRAS mutations can be detected in up to 30% of lung cancers, dependent upon histology and ethnicity [3638], suggesting that a subset of lung cancers would likely be highly sensitive to AZD6244. Our finding that AZD6244 was effective in one distinct KRAS mutant human lung cancer NCI-H460 models supports and validates this hypothesis. Although monotherapy with AZD6244 resulted in antitumor and some antiangiogenic effects in all of our lung cancer models, the antitumor effects were more apparent in the NCI-H1993 lung adenocarcinoma model. The increased antitumor efficacy observed in this model is associated with differences in the inhibitory effect of p-AKT signaling pathway in NCI-H1975 and NCI-H460 lung tumors. However, additional studies are needed to elucidate this phenomenon.

In this study, we evaluated therapy directed against MEK and PI3K/mTOR in distinct gefitinib-resistant NSCLC xenograft models. MEK or PI3K/mTOR inhibition resulted in antitumor effects for these gefitinib-resistance NSCLC models by blocking key intracellular pathways controlling cell proliferation and survival as demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo. Surprisingly, PI3K/mTOR inhibition by BEZ235 also suppressed lung tumor angiogenesis and targeted both MEK and PI3K/mTOR activation in lung tumors, resulting in substantial antiangiogenic effects, which may due to the significantly reduced expression of MMP-9 in tumors. We concluded that the combination of a selective MEK inhibitor and a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor was effective in suppressing the growth of gefitinib-resistant tumors caused by EGFR T790M mutation, MET amplification, and KRAS/PIK3CA mutation. These findings represent a promising strategy for the treatment of gefitinib-resistant NSCLC and provide a strong basis for the design of clinical trials for this purpose.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Respiratory medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

References

  1. She J, Yang P, Hong Q, Bai C: Lung cancer in China: challenges and interventions. Chest. 2013, 143: 1117-1126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF, Ries LA, Howe HL, Wingo PA, Jemal A, Ward E, Anderson RN, Edwards BK: Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003, 95: 1276-1299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu JM, Johnson DH: Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346: 92-98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pao W, Chmielecki J: Rational, biologically based treatment of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010, 10: 760-774.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bean J, Brennan C, Shih JY, Riely G, Viale A, Wang L, Chitale D, Motoi N, Szoke J, Broderick S, Balak M, Chang WC, Yu CJ, Gazdar A, Pass H, Rusch V, Gerald W, Huang SF, Yang PC, Miller V, Ladanyi M, Yang CH, Pao W: Met amplification occurs with or without T790M mutations in EGFR mutant lung tumors with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104: 20932-20937.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T, Song Y, Hyland C, Park JO, Lindeman N, Gale CM, Zhao X, Christensen J, Kosaka T, Holmes AJ, Rogers AM, Cappuzzo F, Mok T, Lee C, Johnson BE, Cantley LC, Jänne PA: MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science. 2007, 316: 1039-1043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sequist LV, Waltman BA, Dias-Santagata D, Digumarthy S, Turke AB, Fidias P, Bergethon K, Shaw AT, Gettinger S, Cosper AK, Akhavanfard S, Heist RS, Temel J, Christensen JG, Wain JC, Lynch TJ, Vernovsky K, Mark EJ, Lanuti M, Iafrate AJ, Mino-Kenudson M, Engelman JA: Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Sci Transl Med. 2011, 3: 75ra26-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pao W, Wang TY, Riely GJ, Miller VA, Pan Q, Ladanyi M: KRAS mutations and primary resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib. PLoS Med. 2005, 2: e17-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Huynh H, Soo KC, Chow PK, Tran E: Targeted inhibition of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase pathway with AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6: 138-146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Yeh TC, Marsh V, Bernat BA, Ballard J, Colwell H, Evans RJ, Parry J, Smith D, Brandhuber BJ, Gross S, Marlow A, Hurley B, Lyssikatos J, Lee PA, Winkler JD, Koch K, Wallace E: Biological characterisation of ARRY-142886 (AZD6244), a potent, highly selective mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 1576-1583.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Huynh H, Chow PK, Soo KC: AZD6244 and doxorubicin induce growth suppression and apoptosis in mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6: 2468-2476.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sos ML, Fischer S, Ullrich R, Peifer M, Heuckmann JM, Koker M, Heynck S, Stückrath I, Weiss J, Fischer F, Michel K, Goel A, Regales L, Politi KA, Perera S, Getlik M, Heukamp LC, Ansén S, Zander T, Beroukhim R, Kashkar H, Shokat KM, Sellers WR, Rauh D, Orr C, Hoeflich KP, Friedman L, Wong KK, Pao W, Thomas RK: Identifying genotype-dependent efficacy of single and combined PI3K- and MAPK-pathway inhibition in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 18351-18356.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoeflich KP, O’Brien C, Boyd Z, Cavet G, Guerrero S, Jung K, Januario T, Savage H, Punnoose E, Truong T, Zhou W, Berry L, Murray L, Amler L, Belvin M, Friedman LS, Lackner MR: In vivo antitumor activity of MEK and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors in basal-like breast cancer models. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 4649-4664.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Engelman JA, Chen L, Tan X, Crosby K, Guimaraes AR, Upadhyay R, Maira M, McNamara K, Perera SA, Song Y, Chirieac LR, Kaur R, Lightbown A, Simendinger J, Li T, Padera RF, García-Echeverría C, Weissleder R, Mahmood U, Cantley LC, Wong KK: Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat Med. 2008, 14: 1351-1356.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu P, Cheng H, Roberts TM, Zhao JJ: Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009, 8: 627-644.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mallon R, Feldberg LR, Lucas J, Chaudhary I, Dehnhardt C, Santos ED, Chen Z, dos Santos O, Ayral-Kaloustian S, Venkatesan A, Hollander I: Anti-tumor effect of PKI-587, a highly potent dual PI3K/mTOR kinase inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res. 2011, 17: 3193-3203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sunaga N, Shames DS, Girard L, Peyton M, Larsen JE, Imai H, Soh J, Sato M, Yanagitani N, Kaira K, Xie Y, Gazdar AF, Mori M, Minna JD: Knockdown of oncogenic KRAS in non-small cell lung cancers suppresses tumor growth and sensitizes tumor cells to targeted therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011, 10: 336-346.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bhardwaj V, Zhan Y, Cortez MA, Ang KK, Molkentine D, Munshi A, Raju U, Komaki R, Heymach JV, Welsh J: C-Met inhibitor MK-8003 radiosensitizes c-Met-expressing non-small-cell lung cancer cells with radiation-induced c-Met-expression. J Thorac Oncol. 2012, 7: 1211-1217.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Davies BR, Logie A, McKay JS, Martin P, Steele S, Jenkins R, Cockerill M, Cartlidge S, Smith PD: AZD6244 (ARRY-142886), a potent inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellularsignal-regulated kinase kinase 1/2 kinases: mechanism ofaction in vivo, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamicmodels relationship, and potential for combination in preclinical. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6: 2209-2219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sano T, Takeuchi S, Nakagawa T, Ishikawa D, Nanjo S, Yamada T, Matsumoto K, Yano S: The novel phosphoinositide 3-kinase–mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, BEZ235, circumvents erlotinib resistance of epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung cancer cells triggered by hepatocyte growth factor. Int J Cancer. 2013, 133: 505-514.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chou TC, Talalay P: Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1984, 22: 27-55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitsudomi T, Yatabe Y: Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2007, 98: 1817-1824.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Friday BB, Adjei AA: Advances in targeting the Ras/Raf/MEK/Erk mitogenactivated protein kinase cascade with MEK inhibitors for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 342-346.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson KW, Sandler AB: The role of MET receptor tyrosine kinase in non-small cell lung cancer and clinical development of targeted anti-MET agents. Oncologist. 2013, 18: 115-122.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Regales L, Gong Y, Shen R, de Stanchina E, Vivanco I, Goel A, Koutcher JA, Spassova M, Ouerfelli O, Mellinghoff IK, Zakowski MF, Politi KA, Pao W: Dual targeting of EGFR can overcome a major drug resistance mutation in mouse models of EGFR mutant lung cancer. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119: 3000-3010.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fremin C, Meloche S: From basic research to clinical development of MEK1/2 inhibitors for cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2010, 3: 8-14.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Adjei AA, Cohen RB, Franklin W, Morris C, Wilson D, Molina JR, Hanson LJ, Gore L, Chow L, Leong S, Maloney L, Gordon G, Simmons H, Marlow A, Litwiler K, Brown S, Poch G, Kane K, Haney J, Eckhardt SG: Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral, small-molecule mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in patients with advanced cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: 2139-2146.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Watson AL, Anderson LK, Greeley AD, Keng VW, Rahrmann EP, Halfond AL, Powell NM, Collins MH, Rizvi T, Moertel CL, Ratner N, Largaespada DA: Co-targeting the MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways in two genetically engineered mouse models of schwann cell tumors reduces tumor grade and multiplicity. Oncotarget. 2014, 5: 1502-1514.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wee S, Jagani Z, Xiang KX, Loo A, Dorsch M, Yao YM, Sellers WR, Lengauer C, Stegmeier F: PI3K pathway activation mediates resistance to MEK inhibitors in KRAS mutant cancers. Cancer Res. 2009, 69: 4286-4293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Shimizu T, Tolcher AW, Papadopoulos KP, Beeram M, Rasco DW, Smith LS, Gunn S, Smetzer L, Mays TA, Kaiser B, Wick MJ, Alvarez C, Cavazos A, Mangold GL, Patnaik A: The clinical effect of the dual-targeting strategy involving PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/MEK/ERK pathways in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012, 18: 2316-2325.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pao W, Miller VA, Politi KA, Riely GJ, Somwar R, Zakowski MF, Kris MG, Varmus H: Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Med. 2005, 2: e73-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Li D, Ambrogio L, Shimamura T, Kubo S, Takahashi M, Chirieac LR, Padera RF, Shapiro GI, Baum A, Himmelsbach F, Rettig WJ, Meyerson M, Solca F, Greulich H, Wong KK: BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 4702-4711.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wong KK, Fracasso PM, Bukowski RM, Lynch TJ, Munster PN, Shapiro GI, Jänne PA, Eder JP, Naughton MJ, Ellis MJ, Jones SF, Mekhail T, Zacharchuk C, Vermette J, Abbas R, Quinn S, Powell C, Burris HA: A phase I study with neratinib (HKI-272), an irreversible pan ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 2552-2558.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Uramoto H, Shimokawa H, Hanagiri T, Kuwano M, Ono M: Expression of selected gene for acquired drug resistance to EGFR-TKI in lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2011, 73: 361-365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Garon EB, Finn RS, Hosmer W, Dering J, Ginther C, Adhami S, Kamranpour N, Pitts S, Desai A, Elashoff D, French T, Smith P, Slamon DJ: Identification of common predictive markers of in vitro response to the Mek inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) in human breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010, 9: 1985-1994.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitsudomi T, Steinberg SM, Oie HK, Mulshine JL, Phelps R, Viallet J, Pass H, Minna JD, Gazdar AF: Ras gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancers are associated with shortened survival irrespective of treatment intent. Cancer Res. 1991, 51: 4999-5002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitsudomi T, Viallet J, Mulshine JL, Linnoila RI, Minna JD, Gazdar AF: Mutations of ras genes distinguish a subset of non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines from small-cell lung cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 1991, 6: 1353-1362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Murray S, Karavasilis V, Bobos M, Razis E, Papadopoulos S, Christodoulou C, Kosmidis P, Fountzilas G: Molecular predictors of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2012, 31: 77-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Qu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement