Skip to main content

Primitive sarcoma of the breast: new insight on the proper surgical management



Primitive sarcoma of the breast is a rare and challenging disease at high risk of recurrence and with poor prognosis. There are controversies in the diagnosis and management of such solid tumor due to its rarity and heterogeneity. This sarcoma is poorly responsive to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy, thus, surgery is the first and most important therapeutic approach. However, given the rarity of this type tumor it has not be possible to standardize unique guidelines for the proper surgical strategy to adopt. Here, we performed a retrospective study of new 10 cases of primitive sarcoma of the breast that underwent either mastectomy or a more conservative quadrantectomy, in the attempt to better standardize correct surgical indications.


Ten new cases of primitive sarcoma of the breast were registered between 2002 and 2012 and constituted the study group. They underwent either mastectomy or quadrantectomy and the clinical, prognostic and survival characteristics after surgery were analysed.


Within the group of patients treated with mastectomy, two had metastasis and died because of that. Among the five patients treated with quadrantectomy four are alive and free of disease after 3 to 5 years follow-up, while the patient with sarcoma arising in pregnancy, although is still alive, developed lung metastases four years after surgery.


The first and most important therapeutic approach to primary sarcomas of the breast is surgical which has the purpose to achieve radical tumor excision to prevent local recurrence and skip metastases. However, given the rarity of the condition and the consequent small number of cases in this, like in similar studies, it is not possible to draw any definitive conclusions and further studies with larger numbers are necessary. However it would appear that performing a larger procedure such as mastectomy rather than performing a more limited one such as a quadrantectomy, has no advantage in terms of overall prognosis.


Primary breast sarcoma (PBS) is a rare malignancy that originates from the mesenchymal tissue of the mammary gland. The variety of cells present in this tissue, such as fat cells, muscle cells, or endothelial cells, accounts for the heterogeneity of the histological types encountered: liposarcomas, angiosarcomas, and leiomyosarcomas. PBS represents <1 % of all primary breast malignancies and <5 % of all sarcomas [14]. PBS is a typically female disease that can rarely occur in male patients. Its natural history does not significantly differ from that of sarcomas of other anatomical sites, except for the angiosarcoma which has a more severe prognosis [5]. PBS can sometimes be diagnosed too late even in patients undergoing screening visits, due to the initial characteristics of this tumor that can mimic benign lesions, such as fibroadenoma or phyllodes tumor [68] and a correct diagnosis is important for planning efficacious surgery treatments. Five years overall survival (OS) does not exceed 55 % and it is influenced by several factors such as tumor localization and dimension, histological features and resection margin status [914].

Due to the rarity of the PBS, it appears difficult to develop univocal guidelines both for the surgical treatment and for any subsequent specific therapy for the breast [9]. Thus, most of the published studies are case reports or studies on small groups of patients. PBS, like all sarcomas, is poorly responsive both to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, although the role of adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy is still unclear in light of the limited size of study reports [7, 15, 16]. The first and most important treatment for PBS is surgery which has the purpose to obtain radical excision of the tumor, with negative margins (R0) and to avoid local tumor recurrence linked to the presence of possible skip metastases [17, 18]. A correct surgical approach is important in many tumors, as also shown by our studies [19]. In order to standardize the surgical approach for limb sarcomas, in 1983 Enneking proposed different types of surgery: 1) intralesional or contaminated surgery, when the tumor is sectioned or broken during the surgical excision; 2) marginal surgery when the tumor is completely removed following the margin of psudocapsule, although skip metastases can occur; 3) wide surgery, when the tumor is completely removed along with a clear layer of normal peritumoral tissue; and 4) compartmental surgery, when the anatomical compartment site of the tumor is completely removed [20, 21]. Compartmental treatment or wide excision are usually considered sufficiently curative in sarcoma management, with resection margins of at least 1–2 cm of normal peritumoral tissue to avoid skip metastasis [2124].

In the attempt to better standardize correct surgical indications for PBS, we performed a retrospective review of 10 new cases of PBS registered from 2002 to 2012 that underwent either mastectomy or a more conservative quadrantectomy in our Surgical Departments, and analyzed their clinical, prognostic and survival characteristics after surgery.

Materials and methods

Study population

Patients with PBS were treated in the Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome and in the Department of Gynecology, “Fabia Mater” Hospital in Rome, Italy, between 2002 and 2012. A total of 10 cases, 9 female and 1 male, were reported in the study. Clinical characteristics, including treatment strategies (i.e., type of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy), histological type, and tumor size were retrospectively analyzed from the medical records. The follow-up information was acquired from the database, the medical records and contact with the patients or their families. Patients were classified into two groups (five patients/each) based on the type of the performed surgery: in the first group the patients (including the only male) were treated with mastectomy; in the second group the patients were treated with the more conservative quadrantectomy (Table 1).

Table 1 Patients, tumor type, surgical treatment and adjuvant therapies

All participants provided written informed consent before participating in this study.

The study was carried out according to the Helsinki Declaration.


Clinical and surgical data

Overall, 10 patients constituted the study group. They were 9 female and 1 male with median age at diagnosis of primary carcinoma of 52.8 years. One patients was <40 years, 5 patients were <60 years, and 4 patients were >60 years at diagnosis (Table 1). The histological analyses showed different istotypes within the two surgical treated groups (Table 1). Tumours were mainly localized in the right chest (7/10) and the size was described by the pathologist for all patients with a median of about 101.6mm (range 15 to 160 mm); a mitosis count was performed for all patients showing 50% up to ten mitoses per field; six out of 10 patients presented severe cellular atypia (Table 2).

Table 2 Tumors characteristics

In the first group, treated with mastectomy, the five patients were affected by, respectively, stromal sarcoma, angiosarcoma, phyllodes tumor with a high degree of malignancy, pleomorphic sarcoma, and liposarcoma (Table 1). The first three patients underwent total mastectomy after a previous not adequate lumpectomy in a different Hospital that left residual tumor on the margins of resection, as evaluated by histologic examination. The patient with phyllodes tumor with a high degree of malignancy underwent mastectomy because the size of tumor (about 150 mm of diameter) while the patient with liposarcoma (the only male) could not undergo conservative surgery due to the lack of available margins. The patients undergoing mastectomy, after a not adequate surgery, were subsequently treated with radiotherapy (50 Gy preoperative - 60 Gy postoperative in 30 fractions) and adjuvant chemotherapy (Epirubicin 60 mg/m2 day 1, 2; Ifosfamide 3g/m2 day 1, 2, 3; Mesna 3g/day 1, 2, 3, for 5 cycles).

In the second group, treated with more conservative quadrantectomy, the patients were affected by, respectively, borderline phyllodes tumor, chondrosarcoma, mixed epithelial/mesenchymal tumor, phyllodes tumor with low grade of malignancy, and sarcoma (Table 1). This last one was diagnosed in a pregnant patient and presented an unusual concentric lesion with sarcomatous tissue in the center, phyllodes tumor in the intermediate layer and tissue with histological features of fibroadenoma outside (Fig. 1). Among the patients undergoing quadrantectomy only the condrosarcoma patient was treated with radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) and adjuvant chemotherapy (Epirubicin 60 mg/m2 day 1, 2; Ifosfamide 3g/m2 day 1, 2, 3; Mesna 3g/day 1, 2, 3, for 3–5 cycles).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Photomicrograph showing breast sarcoma with unusual concentric lesion with sarcomatous tissue in the center, phyllodes tumor in the intermediate layer and tissue with histological features of fibroadenoma outside (magnification, x40)

Survival data

To try to standardize general surgical indications for PBS we next analysed overall survival (OS) as the time from the surgery until death by any cause (Table 3). Among the five patients treated with mastectomy, the one with pleomorphic sarcoma died 1 year after surgery because the appearance of distant metastases while the patient with stromal sarcoma died 6 years after surgery, despite the more demolitive surgery performed. The other three patients treated with total mastectomy after lumpectomy underwent local recurrence of the disease and needed a new surgery, however, after 4 to 5 years follow-up they are free of disease.

Table 3 Patients, tumor type, and overall survival (OS)

Among the five patients treated with the more conservative quadrantectomy four are alive and free of disease after 3 to 5 years follow-up, including the borderline phyllodes tumor patient, despite the large size of the tumor compared to the breast (Fig. 2), the chondrosarcoma patient, the mixed epithelial/mesenchymal metaplastic carcinoma patient and the phyllodes tumor with low grade malignancy patient. The mixed epithelial/mesenchymal metaplastic carcinoma patient, due to dual nature of the tumor, underwent outer quadrantectomy of the right breast with equatorial enlargement of the distal and proximal margins and removal of the sentinel lymph node with mixed reactive hyperplastic chronic lymphadenitis. Different was the course of the sarcoma arising in pregnancy, whereas excision of the lesion (with local anesthesia for gestational status of the patient) was followed by a subsequent further enlargement of resection margins, considering the final histological examination. Four years after surgery the patient developed lung metastases and is still alive underlying the importance of a correct surgical approach since the beginning (in this case, surgery was influenced by the pregnancy status of the patient).

Fig. 2
figure 2

(a), (b) Macroscopic aspects of borderline phyllodes tumor


Sarcoma of the breast is a very rare disease which represents <1% of breast cancers and <5% of all location sarcomas [15, 25]. For this reason, it is difficult to identify a specific treatment for these patients. There is widespread acceptance that surgical resection should be the first modality of treatment for breast sarcoma. However, it is still unclear which would be the surgical treatment with the best outcome for the patients [17, 18].

The purpose of surgery is excellent local control and for many years, mastectomy was regarded as the gold standard. The choice of a more or less demolitive surgical intervention (respectively, mastectomy and quadrantectomy) is based on the possibility to obtain adequate margins of healthy peritumoral tissue which would ensure both the complete removal of the tumor and the excision of possible skip metastases, that unlike what happens in other tumors, including melanoma, are not detectable by instrumental examinations [2226]. To reach this goal, it is particularly important to evaluate the tumor/breast size ratio before surgery in order to properly perform a correct planning of the surgical strategy which could include even conservative surgery without compromising the prognosis [27]. Thus, we showed here that, despite the large size of the tumor compared to the breast (Fig. 2), the borderline phyllodes tumor patient was treated with the more conservative quadrantectomy that allowed to keep the patient still alive and free of disease after 5 years follow-up.

About the two patients undergoing mastectomy and that subsequently died of recurrent disease, it should be highlighted that the first case was a reoperation after inadequate excision previously performed elsewhere, while in the second case the diameter of the tumor (160 mm) and the tumor/breast size ratio did not allow another type of surgical approach. Among the patients treated with quadrantectomy, it was particularly interesting the case of the pregnant woman with “concentric” lesion (center sarcoma, intermediate layer phyllodes, outside fibroadenoma). This particular situation occurred in pregnancy did suggest the possible malignant evolution (from center to the periphery) of mesenchymal lesions originally benign, even if the observation of a single case allows us to only assume this type of evolution. Some studies show significantly increased OS after total mastectomy as compared with conservative surgery in PBS patients [8]. In contrast, other studies have demonstrated no significant advantage to mastectomy in comparison with wide local excision [1, 16, 2830]. This is similar to our observation on the treatment of PBS patients.

Furthermore, local recurrence rate varies according to the location, the histological type and technical possibilities to perform a wide or compartmental excision [31]. Surgery is the first and most effective treatment for these tumors and indeed, with resection margins of less than 1 cm, the local recurrence rate is around 13%, while with resection margins larger than 1 cm local recurrence rate is around 0% [11, 32], since with wide resection margins the so-called skip metastasis are removed en bloc with the tumor. Therefore, surgeons must pay particular attention to the characteristics of the resection margins [7, 33, 34]. Importantly, only for angiosarcomas resection margins must be at least 3 cm of healthy peritumoral tissue, while for all other sarcomas of the breast a margin of 1 cm is considered sufficiently curative [15].

Mastectomy for mesenchymal neoplasms should not normally be performed with axillary lymphadenectomy, since these tumors mainly spread by blood vessels; the axillary lymphadenectomy may expose the patient to increased morbidity with no significant increase of disease-free survival and overall survival rate. Conversely for mixed tumors, lymphadenopathy or for the tumors along the axillary fold, sentinel lymph node biopsy can be considered [27].

Thanks to core-byopsy examination, we were actually able to identify both the degree and the histological type of the tumors, and we could better plan the preoperative surgical approach to sarcomas [31]. Furthermore, the new concepts about the embryonic development of the breast have redefined the idea of surgical anatomical compartment [35]. Indeed, thanks to recent studies on embryonic development of the mammary gland, a separate origin of the various glandular segments or lobules has been hypothesized and, therefore, the removal of an anatomical segment or quadrant can be considered as the resection of the corresponding anatomical compartment (compartmental surgery) [35].

After surgery, depending on the risk of relapse (related to the diameter, location and grade of the tumor) adjuvant radiation therapy may be indicated, possibly associated with chemotherapy. Radiotherapy (preoperative 50 Gy, postoperative 60 Gy) is really important in the treatment of sarcomas, since it allows, if used in combination with surgery and also for conservative surgery, to achieve results comparable to those obtained with radical, demolitive surgery. Chemotherapy (Epirubicin 60 mg/m2 day 1, 2; Ifosfamide 3 g/m2 day 1, 2, 3; Mesna 3 g/day 1, 2, 3, for 3–5 cycles) may represent advantage for patients with high-risk lesions [24].

In summary, in literature, we did not find that mastectomy has a better chance of long-term survival for sarcomas of the breast compared to wide excision or to quadrantectomy, while the simple lumpectomy has a more severe prognosis [27]. In our experience, the histological features and the correct first surgical approach influenced the prognosis more than the size of the tumor, and obviously, early diagnosis is fundamental, as indeed for all cancers.


Sarcomas of the breast, like all sarcomas, are poorly responsive both to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and, therefore, surgery has the most important role. Concerning the prognosis, surgery has the purpose to obtain a radical excision (R0 margins), avoiding local recurrence linked to the presence of possible "skip metastases". As highlighted in some of our cases, surgery is not effective in preventing distant metastases if they were already present at the time of the operation, even if not still diagnosable. Wide demolitive surgery (based on old concept of anatomical compartment) not always positively influences the prognosis, and even our study shows that the prognosis is mainly influenced by aggressiveness of the tumor, evaluated with a preoperative biopsy, correct first surgical approach and treatment, and early diagnosis. Furthermore, we do not have to underestimate functional, aesthetic and psychological aspects that may influence the quality of patients life after a more demolitive surgery, sometimes without a real improvement of disease-free period and overall survival.

Recent embryological studies confirm segmental/lobular origin of breast cancer. Thanks to these new informations we have now a different concept of anatomical compartment for sarcomas of the breast and, when possible, we can choose to perform less demolitive operations (quadrantectomy) with the same results of a more aggressive but not more useful surgery. The adjuvant radiotherapy following conservative surgery is surely useful in monitoring local recurrences, especially for larger and high grade tumors. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy is still controversial, and it may be indicated for more severe prognosis cancers.



primary breast sarcoma




overall survival




  1. McGowan TS, Cummings BJ, O’Sullivan B, Catton CN, Miller N, Panzarella T. An analysis of 78 breast sarcoma patients without distant metastases at presentation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;46:383–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Terrier P, Terrier Lacombe MJ, Mouriesse H, Friedman S, Spielmann M, Contesso G. Primary breast of sarcoma: a review of 33 cases with immunoistochemistry and prognostic factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1989;13:39–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Szajewski M, Kruszewski WJ, Ciesielski M, Smialek-Kusiwaska U, Czerepko M, Szefel J. Primary osteosarcoma of the breast: a case report. Oncol Lett. 2014;7:1962–4.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arora TK, Terracina KP, Soong J, Idowu MO, Takabe K. Primary and secondary angiosarcoma of the breast. Gland Surg. 2014;3:28–34.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zelek L, Llombart-Cussac A, Terrier P, Pivot X, Guinebretiere JM, Le Pechoux C, et al. Prognostic factors in primary breast sarcomas: A series of patient with long-term follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2583–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pasta V, Amabile MI, Bizzarri M, Monti M. Breast sarcoma in a pregnant patient. Ann Ital Chir. 2012;28:2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pencavel TD, Hayes A. Breast sarcoma-a review of diagnosis and management. Int J Surg. 2009;7:20–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang F, Jia Y, Tong Z. Comparison of the clinical prognostic and features between the primary breast and malignant phylloides tumor. Jpan J Clin Oncol. 2015;45:146–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deo SV, Manjunath NM, Shukla NK. A review of controversies in the management of soft tissue sarcomas. Indian J Surg. 2012;74:228–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bousquet G, Confavreux C, Magne N, de Lara CT, Poortmans P, Senkus E, et al. Outcome and prognostic factors in breast sarcoma: a multicenter study from the rare cancer network. Radiother Oncol. 2007;85:355–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Canter RJ, Qin L-X, Ferone CR, Brennan MF. Why do patients with low grade soft tissue sarcoma die? Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3550–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shriver CD, Hueman MT, Ellsworth RE. Molecular signatures of lymph node status by intrinsic subtype: gene expression analysis of primary breast tumors from patients with and without metastatic lymph nodes. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33:116.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou X, Wang X, Huang Z, Xu L, Zhu W, Liu P. An ER-associated miRNA signature predicts prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33:94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meng J, Li P, Zhang Q, Yang Z, Fu S. A four-long non-coding RNA signature in predicting breast cancer survival. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33:84.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rizzi A, Soregaroli A, Zambelli C, Zorzi F, Mutti S, Codignola C, et al. Primary osteosarcoma of the breast: a case report. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2013;2013:858705.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fields RC, Aft RL, Gillanders WE, Eberlein TJ, Margenthaler JA. Treatment and outcomes of patients with primary breast sarcoma. Am J Surg. 2008;196:559–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shabahang M, Franceschi D, Sundaram M, Castillo MH, Moffat FL, Frank DS, et al. Surgical management of primary breast sarcoma. Am Surg. 2002;68:673–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smola MG, Ratschek M, Amann W, Samonigg H, Mayer R. The impact of resection margins in the treatment of primary sarcomas of the breast. A clinicopathological study of 8 cases with review of literature. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1993;19:61–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Custureri F, D'Orazi V, Peparini N, Gabatel R, Urciuoli P, Patrizi G, et al. Choice of surgical treatment in early gastric cancer. Hepato-Gastroent. 2004;51:1210–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;153:106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Enneking WF. Musculoskeletal surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rydholm A, Rooser B. Surgical margins for soft-tissue sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:1074–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trovik CS, Bauer HC, Alvegard TA, Anderson H, Blomqvist C, Berlin O, et al. Surgical margins, local recurrence and metastasis in soft tissue sarcomas: 559 surgically-treated patients from the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Register. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:710–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Soft tissue sarcoma. Version 1.2014. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2014.

  25. Voutsadakis IA, Zaman K, Leyvraz S. Breast sarcomas: current and future perspectives. Breast. 2011;20:199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Solivetti FM, Desiderio F, Guerrisi A, Bonadies A, Maini CL, Di Filippo S, et al. HF ultrasound vs PET-CT and telethermography in the diagnosis of In-transit metastases from melanoma: a prospective study and review of the literature. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33:96.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pasta V, Sottile D, Urciuoli P, Del Vecchio L, Custureri F, D’Orazi V. Rare chondrosarcoma of the brest trated with quadrantectomy instead of mastectomy: A case report. Oncol Lett. 2015;9:1116–20.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McGregor GI, Knowling MA, Este FA. Sarcoma and cystosarcoma phyllodes tumors of the breast-a retrospective review of 58 cases. Am J Surg. 1994;167:477–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanguinetti A, Bistoni G, Calzolari F, Lucchini R, Monacelli M, Triola R, et al. Cystosarcoma phyllodes with muscular and lymph node metastasis. Our experience and review of the literature. Ann Ital Chir. 2012;83(4):331–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Confavreux C, Lurkin A, Mitton N, Blondet R, Saba C, Ranchere D, et al. Sarcomas and malignant phyllodes tumours of the breast-a retrospective study. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:2715–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Baldini EH, Goldberg J, Jenner C, Manola JB, Demetri GD, Fletcher CD, et al. Long-term outcomes after function-sparing surgery without radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(10):3252–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lan Y, Zhu J, Liu J, Yang H, Jiang Y, Wei W. Periductal stromal sarcoma of the breast: A case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett. 2014;8(3):1181–3.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tseng W, Martinez SR, Tamurian RM, Borys D, Canter RJ. Histologic type predicts survival in patients with retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma. J Surg Res. 2012;172(1):123–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cho SY, Moon KC, Cheong MS, Kwak C, Kim HH, Ku JH. Significance of microscopic margin status in completely resected retroperitoneal sarcoma. J Urol. 2011;186(1):59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wilder F, D’Angelo S, Crago M. Soft Tissue Tumors of the trunk: management of local disease in the breast and chest and abdominal walls. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(5):546–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the patients who participated in this study. No financial support was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerio D’Orazi.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

VP, MC and VD designed and wrote the paper; VP, MM, AI, SR and MV performed the surgery; PU and MV supported the writing of the paper; MC, VP and VD performed the literature search and data acquisition. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pasta, V., Monti, M., Cialini, M. et al. Primitive sarcoma of the breast: new insight on the proper surgical management. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 34, 72 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: