Skip to main content

Choline kinase alpha impairment overcomes TRAIL resistance in ovarian cancer cells



Choline kinase-α (ChoKα/CHKA) overexpression and hyper-activation sustain altered choline metabolism conferring the cholinic phenotype to epithelial ovarian cancer (OC), the most lethal gynecological tumor. We previously proved that CHKA down-modulation reduced OC cell aggressiveness and increased sensitivity to in vitro chemotherapeutics’ treatment also affecting intracellular content of one-carbon metabolites. In tumor types other than ovary, methionine decrease was shown to increase sensitivity to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-receptor 2 triggering. These effects were suggestive of a potential role for ChoKα in regulating susceptibility to TRAIL cytokine.


The relationship between ChoKα/CHKA and TRAIL-receptor 2 (TRAIL-R2) expression was investigated in silico in OC patients’ GEO datasets and in vitro in a panel of OC cell lines upon transient CHKA silencing (siCHKA). The effect of siCHKA on metabolites content was assessed by LC-MS. The triggered apoptotic signalling was studied following soluble-TRAIL or anti-TRAIL-R2 agonist antibody treatment. Lipid rafts were isolated by Triton X-100 fractionation. Preclinical ex vivo studies were performed in OC cells derived from patients’ ascites using autologous PBLs as effectors and a bispecific anti-TRAIL-R2/anti-CD3 antibody as triggering agent.


Here we demonstrate that siCHKA specifically overcomes resistance to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in OC cells. Upon siCHKA we detected: a significant sensitization to caspase-dependent apoptosis triggered by both soluble TRAIL and anti-TRAIL-R2 agonist antibody, a specific increase of TRAIL-R2 expression and TRAIL-R2 relocation into lipid rafts. In siCHKA-OC cells the acquired TRAIL sensitivity was completely reverted upon recovery of ChoKα expression but, at variance of other tumor cell types, TRAIL sensitivity was not efficiently phenocopied by methionine deprivation. Of note, we were also able to show that siCHKA sensitized tumor cells derived ex vivo from OC patients’ ascites to the cytotoxic activity of autologous lymphocytes redirected by a bispecific anti-TRAIL-R2/anti-CD3 antibody.


Our findings suggest that ChoKα/CHKA impairment, by restoring drug-induced or receptor-mediated cell death, could be a suitable therapeutic strategy to be used in combination with chemotherapeutics or immunomodulators to improve OC patients’ outcome.


In spite of its low occurrence, ovarian cancer (OC) is the primary cause of death among gynecological malignancies [1] mainly due to a late diagnosis and to its propensity to recur as chemoresistant disease with slight improvement of survival rates in recent years [2]. Drug resistance is a complex phenomenon associated with several alterations affecting multiple pathways [3]. Cancer cells frequently acquire the ability to resist to apoptotic stimuli induced by chemotherapeutic agents or by death receptors triggering. In this scenario, we contributed to define the mechanisms of OC escape from the death receptor CD95/Fas signaling [4,5,6]. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor 2 (R2) is one of the death-inducing receptors triggered by TRAIL, a member of the TNF ligand super-family of cytokines, produced and secreted by most immune cells [7] and considered a promising anticancer agent due to its remarkable ability to selectively kill neoplastic cells sparing normal ones. However, the majority of solid tumors including OC are known to develop resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Overcoming this resistance still remains an open challenge [8, 9] and in this perspective, we recently showed that bispecific antibodies directed to TRAIL-R2 as tumor-associated antigen (TAA) and to CD3 as triggering molecule were able to redirect polyclonal MHC-unrestricted T lymphocytes cytotoxicity toward OC cells [10].

Among the complex alterations responsible for acquired resistance to death stimuli, there is also the metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells [11]. Interestingly, it was recently reported that methionine deprivation in different cancer models could induce a targetable vulnerability by increasing TRAIL-R2 expression [12,13,14]. Like many other cancer types, OC shows alterations in the main metabolic pathways [15, 16] and the cholinic phenotype, characterized by increased phosphocholine (PCho) intracellular content, is of particular interest [17]. We demonstrated that the increase in PCho content in OC cells is mainly maintained by the overexpression and activity of choline kinase alpha (ChoKα/CHKA) [18, 19], an enzyme catalyzing choline phosphorylation in the first phosphatidylcholine biosynthetic step [20]. A large body of works indicates that ChoKα is directly associated with malignancy [17, 21] and we contributed to demonstrate its involvement in sustaining the OC transformed status [22]. Indeed, we showed that CHKA gene silencing generally hampered OC aggressiveness both in vitro and in vivo by reducing cell proliferation, migration and invasion capabilities [23]. Furthermore, following ChoKα impairment we observed a decreased intracellular content of metabolites other than PCho such as cysteine, serine, methionine and glutathione suggesting deep alterations in circuitry related to one-carbon cycles [24, 25]. In particular we found that the decrease in glutathione level impaired oxidative stress redox status, thus raising intracellular reactive oxygen species that increased in vitro sensitivity to standard chemotherapeutics [24].

Here we aimed to investigate in in vitro and ex vivo OC models whether the ChoKα pro-tumorigenic functions could also affect susceptibility to TRAIL-dependent apoptosis and in particular if the inactivation of ChoKα/CHKA expression and function could be a suitable strategy to overcome TRAIL resistance.


Cell cultures

The following OC cell lines were used: SKOV3, OVCAR5, A2780 (obtained from ATCC), INTOV11 (obtained in our laboratory from a high-grade serous OC [23]), A2774 (provided from dr. S. Ferrini, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico S. Martino, Italy) were maintained in RPMI1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% FCS (Lonza) and 2 mM L-glutamine (Lonza); OVCAR3 (from ATCC) were maintained in RPMI1640 supplemented with 20% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM Na pyruvate; OAW42 (provided by dr. A. Ullrich, Max-Planck Institute, Germany) were maintained in EMEM (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine and non essential amino acids (Lonza). Cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified incubator under 5% CO2 and genotyped at Functional Genomic facility of our Institute, using Stem Elite ID System (Promega) according to ATCC guidelines. Cells were routinely confirmed to be mycoplasma-free by MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza). For methionine deprivation experiments, RPMI1640 L-methionine free medium (Thermo-Fisher) was used.

Transient gene silencing

A total of 1.8 × 105 OC cells/well were seeded on six-well plates (Eppendorf) and transfected with a final concentration of 40 nM small interfering RNA (Supplementary Table 1). Transfection was carried using Lipofectamine2000 (ThermoFisher). The efficacies of silencing and related biological effects were assessed 72 h after transfection. Recovery of ChoKα expression was evaluated 144 h after transfection.

Quantitative real time PCR

Total RNA extraction and qRT-PCR were performed as previously described [23]. The ΔCT method was used to determine the quantity of the target sequences and GAPDH or RPL13A were amplified as housekeeping controls. For probes used see Supplementary Table 1.

Western blotting

Cells were lysed using RIPA buffer [19] while ex vivo derived samples were directly lysed with NuPAGE LDS buffer (ThermoFisher). Proteins solving, immunodecorations, blots acquisition and densitometric analysis were performed as previously described [23]. Antibodies (Supplementary Table 1) were diluted as recommended.

Metabolomic profiling

For metabolites analysis 2 × 105 cells were lysed in 500 μl H2O + 0.1% formic acid and centrifuged at 3.500 rpm for 15 min in Amicon Ultra-0.5 membrane tubes. Elutions (10 μl) were injected in triplicates and analyzed using the following platforms: I) Accela LC systems (Thermo Scientific) connected to a TSQ Quantum Access Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a HESI ion source separating the analytes at 35 °C on a XBridge BEH300 C18 column (3.5 μm, 2.1 × 150 mm; Waters); II) ExionLC AD system (SCIEX) connected to a TripleTOF 6600 System (SCIEX) equipped with a Turbo V ion source with ESI Probe separating analytes at 40 °C with CORTECS UPLC T3 column (1.6 μm, 2.1 × 150 mm; Waters). Run was performed in isocratic mode at 97% mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water) and 3% mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in methanol) in 5 min at a flow rate of 300 μl/min. Mass spectra were collected in positive ion mode. Selected Reaction Monitoring transition of the precursor to product ions was used for quantification. Individual stock solutions of methionine and phosphocholine were prepared from separate weightings of each compound dissolved in 0.1 M HCl. A standard mix with all analytes at 15, 62, 250 and 1000 ng/ml concentrations for calibration curves. Deuterates form of the two metabolites (Met-d2 and PCho-d9, Merck Millipore) at 10 μg/ml were used as internal standards. For each curve, the absolute peak-area ratios of standard to the internal standard were calculated and plotted against the nominal concentration. Calibration curves were generated by weighted (1/x) linear regression analysis. To account for bias in sensitivity of metabolites detection of the two different platforms, data were reported as relative ratio of metabolite content between siCHKA vs control cells.

Flow cytometry

For detection of TRAIL-Rs membrane expression, cells were incubated with primary antibodies for 45 min on ice (or at 37 °C where indicated). For detection of total TRAIL-R2 expression, cells were permeabilized with eBioscience Permeabilization Buffer (Invitrogen) before staining. Antibodies (Supplementary Table 1) were diluted as recommended. Fluorescence index was calculated as ratio between mean fluorescence intensity values of TRAIL-Rs and negative controls (IgG isotype PE-conjugated or ALEXA488 in direct or indirect immunostaining, respectively).

Quantification of apoptosis was carried out by staining cells with FITC-conjugated Annexin V (Abcam) and To-PRO-III cyanine dye (Invitrogen). Mitochondrial membrane potential (ψm) was determined by staining cells with 5 μg/ml JC-1 dye (Invitrogen) for 10 min at 37 °C.

Fluorescence labeling was measured acquiring samples by the LSRFortessa system (Becton-Dickinson), data were analyzed and processed with the FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc).

Cell growth inhibition assay

Cells seeded in triplicates at 104/well in 96-well plates (Costar) were treated for 16 h with 0.5 μg/ml sTRAIL (Killer TRAIL soluble human recombinant, Enzo LifeSciences) or 25 μg/ml specific agonist anti-TRAIL-R2 antibody [10]. For caspases inhibition, cells were incubated with 50 μM of pan-caspases, Caspase-9 or Caspase-8 inhibitors (Z-VAD-FMK, Z-LEHD-FMK, Z-IETD-FMK, Calbiochem) for 1 h before sTRAIL exposition. For each test, untreated triplicates were seeded as control. Growth inhibition was assessed using the CellTiter-GLO luminescent cell viability assay (Promega) measuring luminescence by an Ultra reader apparatus (Tecan Group).

Public datasets analysis

Expression of CHKA and TNFRSF10B were explored in public available gene expression studies on GEO repository ( reporting data for ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), low malignant potential (LMP), low/high grade tumors profiled on the same microarray platform (Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0). Nine datasets were selected: GSE18520, GSE27651, GSE14001, GSE12172, GSE14407, GSE23391, GSE29450, GSE20565, GSE19352 accounting for a total of 333 samples including 45 OSE; 38 LMP; 57 LG; 191 HG tumors. Raw data were retrieved and signal intensity was normalized within each individual dataset using Robust Multi-Array Average [26]. The datasets were integrated following a meta-analysis approach by applying analytical methods for data normalization and batch effect correction as previously described [27]. The log2 expression of CHKA and TNFRSF10B identified by 204266_s_at and 209295_at Affymetrix probe sets, respectively, were retrieved. Boxplots were generated using the “ggplot2” R package with the notched boxplot function. The p-values were calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Correlation plot using scatter graph between CHKA and TNFRSF10B is visualized by “ggpubr” R package and correlation assessed by Pearson’s test.

Triton X-100 soluble and insoluble fractionation

Separation of TX-soluble and TX-insoluble fractions was performed as already described [28]. Proteins of TX-soluble and an equivalent volume of TX-insoluble fractions were analyzed by Western blotting. Cav-1 or Flot-1 were used as markers of the TX-insoluble fraction.

Patients’ derived samples and lymphocytes retargeting

Cells from the ascitic fluid of a chemo-naive stage IIIC patient (TEM1510A) undergoing surgery for a high grade serous OC were collected by centrifugation and seeded in a flask for 30 min. Non-adherent tumor cells clumps were recovered and maintained in RPMI1640 in according to cell culture conditions until processed for further analysis. Autologous peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were collected as described [10]. Patients had signed an informed consent form, in accordance with the institutional ethics committee guidelines and following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. For PBLs retargeting experiment, growth inhibition was evaluated by MTT assay [10] using PBLs as effectors, tumor cells isolated from OC patients’ ascitic fluids as targets and the TRAIL-R2 × CD3 bispecific antibody (bsAb) as retargeting agent [29].


Cells were analyzed using an Eclipse TE2000-S microscope with a 20× or 40× 0.75NA objectives (Nikon). Images were acquired with ACT-1 software (Nikon) and processed using ImageJ and Adobe Photoshop softwares.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Prism GraphPad software. Statistical significance of differences was determined by Student’s t-test, as specified. Asterisks in all figures denote a statistically significant difference in comparison with the relative control *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Data reported are the mean ± S.D. of at least three independent experiments unless otherwise indicated.


CHKA silencing overcomes TRAIL resistance

The deprivation of methionine, a key metabolite of one-carbon metabolism [30], was recently shown to induce an increased vulnerability to TRAIL-R2-dependent apoptotic signaling in different in vitro cancer models [12--14]. Interestingly, along with reduced aggressiveness and increased sensitivity to chemotherapeutics, the metabolic profiles of two CHKA stably silenced OC cell lines showed the perturbation of several metabolites related to one-carbon cycles [24]. Notably, in these CHKA stably silenced models, methionine content was significantly decreased as compared to their relative controls (Fig. 1a). Taken together, these observations suggested that interfering with ChoKα-dependent phenotype could ultimately increase TRAIL sensitivity in OC cells.

Fig. 1

CHKA silencing affected methionine intracellular content. a. Quantification of methionine signals in control (ΔLuc) and CHKA stably silenced (shCHKA) OC cell lines obtained by mass spectrometry with the Metabolon Technology [24]. b. Content of methionine (upper panel) and phosphocholine (lower panel) obtained by mass spectrometry analysis of OC cell lines; data are reported as percentage of transient siCHKA/siNT ratio. Asterisks are referred to statistically significant differences

To support these findings, a broad panel of OC cell lines representative of different OC subtypes, including those already characterized for cholinic phenotype [24], were analyzed for methionine content following transient CHKA silencing (siCHKA, Fig. S1). The decrease in methionine was validated by mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in all the models tested together with the reduction of PCho as metabolic readout of efficacy of siCHKA (Fig. 1b).

To verify the hypothesis that ChoKα/CHKA impairment could ultimately affect activation of TRAIL-R2-dependent apoptotic signaling, we characterized the basal membrane expression of TRAIL-R2 and the sensitivity to TRAIL cytokine (sTRAIL) treatment in all OC in vitro models. Flow cytometry analysis showed that TRAIL-R2 membrane expression was globally low in all the cell lines tested except for A2780 and A2774 cells (Fig. 2a). Growth inhibition assay indicated low cell sensitivity to TRAIL, growth inhibition exceeded 50% in only two out of seven OC lines (Fig. 2b). In line with literature data [31], no direct correlation (P = 0.87) was observed between basal expression of TRAIL-R2 and TRAIL sensitivity (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2

TRAIL resistance in OC cell lines is not related to basal TRAIL-R2 expression levels and is specifically overcome by siCHKA. a. Representative flow cytometry analysis showing surface membrane expression of TRAIL-R2 in wild type OC cell lines. Fluorescence index is reported. b. Percentage of TRAIL-mediated growth inhibition of wild type OC cell lines following 16 h treatment with sTRAIL as compared to relative untreated cells. c. Correlative plot of TRAIL-R2 membrane basal expression (fluorescence index) versus percentage of TRAIL-mediated cell growth inhibition. In red are indicated TRAIL-resistant cell lines. d. OC cells sensitivity to sTRAIL treatment following: siCHKA; recovery of ChoKα expression (144 h after silencing); siCHKB; deprivation of methionine (−Met) and deprivation of glutamine (−Gln). Asterisks are referred to statistically significant differences. Dotted lines indicated 50% growth inhibition

To characterize the effects of siCHKA on TRAIL-triggered cell death we specifically focused on the three frankly resistant OC cell lines never exceeding 20% growth inhibition following sTRAIL exposure: OAW42, SKOV3 and A2780. Following siCHKA we detected a significant increase of TRAIL sensitivity in all three cellular models compared to their relative controls (siNT) (Fig. 2d). Notably, following recovery of ChoKα expression after transient silencing (Fig. S2A), the sensitivity to sTRAIL treatment was completely reverted dropping at level of control cells (Fig. 2d). Moreover, cells sensitization was specifically dependent upon siCHKA since by silencing the beta isoform (ChoKβ/CHKB) of Choline kinase (siCHKB, Fig. S2B) TRAIL-mediated cell death did not increase (Fig. 2d). To determine whether the effects of siCHKA on TRAIL sensitization could be directly dependent to the observed methionine decrease (Fig. 1b, upper panel), the three OC cell lines were grown in standard or methionine-free media for 72 h. At variance with results described in other tumor models [12--14], we observed only a moderate effect of methionine deprivation on TRAIL sensitization. Furthermore, such effect was similar to that observed following deprivation of glutamine, an essential aminoacid not directly related to methionine and/or choline metabolisms (Fig. 2d).

Taken together these results confirmed that siCHKA was specifically capable to overcome TRAIL resistance in OC cells but this effect was only partially affected by metabolic alterations related to methionine deprivation.

sTRAIL triggers an efficient apoptotic cascade in siCHKA OC cells

Starting from 2 h of incubation, sTRAIL treatment promoted in siCHKA cells an enhanced cell shrinkage followed by a general cell detachment from the culture plate (Fig. 3a), suggesting an apoptotic process. Indeed, the early apoptotic event of Annexin V binding on cells’ membrane was evident in all three OC cell lines upon siCHKA and sTRAIL treatment (Fig. 3b). In addition, while sTRAIL treatment of control cells did not affect PARP integrity, its cleavage was evident in treated siCHKA cells thus indicating an efficient apoptotic cascade. Furthermore, the activation of the final effector Caspase-3 was also evident as indicated by the presence of its cleaved form (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3

sTRAIL treatment triggered an efficient apoptotic cascade in siCHKA OC cells. a. Live 40× microscopy images of siCHKA OC cell lines untreated or treated with sTRAIL. Scaled bar = 100 μm. b. Representative flow cytometry analysis showing Annexin V/To-PRO-III staining of siCHKA and control OC cells following sTRAIL treatment. Q4: healthy cells, Q3: early apoptotic cells, Q2: late apoptotic cells, Q1: necrotic cells/debris (for each quadrant, the cell percentage on total count events is reported). c. Left panel: Representative Western blotting for PARP and Caspase-3 expression in siCHKA and siNT cell lines after sTRAIL treatment. Arrows indicate the cleaved forms of the proteins. Vinculin was used as loading control. Right panel: densitometric analysis of cleaved PARP and Caspase-3 proteins in siCHKA sTRAIL-treated cells versus control (untreated) cells. d. Percentage of TRAIL-mediated cell growth inhibition (16 h sTRAIL treatment) of OC cells siNT (black bars) and siCHKA (white bars) alone or in presence of pan-caspases inhibitor (red bars), Caspase-9 inhibitor (grey bars), Caspase-8 inhibitor (blue bars). Statistical differences are reported

The general involvement of caspases in TRAIL-mediated cell death following siCHKA was confirmed by pre-treating cells with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD that completely abolished TRAIL sensitivity in all siCHKA OC models (Fig. 3d, red bars). To further analyze whether extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways differently contributed to the execution of cell death program, before sTRAIL exposure we incubated siCHKA and control cells to specific inhibitors of initiator Caspase-9 or initiator Caspase-8 (mainly involved in intrinsic or extrinsic pathways respectively). Inhibition of Caspase-9 slightly affected apoptosis only in siCHKA OAW42 and SKOV3 cell lines, suggesting that the involvement of intrinsic pathway has different relevance in the different models (Fig. 3d, grey bars). Furthermore, in spite of a mitochondrial membrane potential decrease observed following siCHKA (Fig. S3A), we did not detect the truncated form of the mitochondrial transducer Bid nor altered expression of the pro- and anti-apoptotic molecules affecting mitochondrial function such as Bcl-2 and XIAP (Fig. S3B) substantially in agreement with the weak effects observed following Caspase-9 inhibitor treatment.

At variance, the specific inhibition of Caspase-8 significantly affected apoptosis in all the cell lines tested thus indicating that the main contribution to execution of the apoptotic program is given by activation of the extrinsic pathway (Fig. 3d, blue bars).

Sensitization to sTRAIL treatment of siCHKA OC cells is specifically dependent on TRAIL-R2 membrane expression and triggering

In order to check the molecular mechanisms involved in the siCHKA-dependent OC cells sensitization to apoptosis, we analyzed the effect of siCHKA on TRAIL-R2 transcript (TNFRSF10B) and protein expression.

In the previously described CHKA stably silenced OC model [23] we detected a 1.27 fold increase (P = 0.0066, FDR = 0.2) of the TNFRSF10B gene compared to controls [23]. Interestingly, by checking the expression of CHKA and TNFRSF10B in nine public available datasets reporting data for ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), low malignant potential (LMP), low/high grade tumors for a total of 333 samples (Methods), we observed a progressive increase of CHKA along with malignancy, thus sustaining our previously published data [18, 19], and a corresponding decrease of TNFRSF10B (Fig. 4a, left panels). Expression of the two genes appeared anti-correlated (Fig. 4a, right panel). Notably, also in the panel of CHKA-silenced OC cell lines we detected an increase, although moderate, of TNFRSF10B transcript expression compared to controls (Fig. 4b and c).

Fig. 4

CHKA and TNFRSF10B expression are inversely related in OC samples and cell lines. a. Left panels: Notched box plots showing the log2 expression values of CHKA and TNFRSF10B within preparations of normal ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), low malignant potential (LMP), low grade (LG), high grade (HG) tumors. The boxes represent the interquartile range; the notches the 95% confidence intervals of the median; the whiskers the ranges within 1.5× interquartile range of the upper or lower quartile. Right panel: Inverse correlation of log2 expression between CHKA and TNFRSF10B in the meta-analysis, 95% confidence area (grey region). b. Comparative analysis of CHKA (red boxes) and TNSFRSF10B (grey boxes) transcripts variation in OC cell lines following siCHKA. For each transcript, the relative change as compared to siNT cells is shown. Dotted line (=1) represents no transcript expression variation between siCHKA and siNT samples. c. Relative quantification of TNFRSF10B transcript expression reported as percentage of 2^-ΔCT siCHKA/siNT ratio (left panel); asterisks are referred to a statistically significant differences; a representative experiment is shown (right panel)

We thus checked TRAIL-R2 protein expression in the three selected TRAIL-resistant siCHKA OC models. Although no appreciable variations of total protein amount were detectable (Fig. 5a), we clearly observed by flow cytometry an increase of TRAIL-R2 membrane exposure in siCHKA SKOV3 and A2780 while no changes were evident in siCHKA OAW42 cells (Fig. 5b). Interestingly, in SKOV3 and A2780 models, the basal TRAIL-R2 membrane level was completely rescued upon the natural recovery of ChoKα expression after silencing (Fig. 5b) in accordance with the reversion of sensitivity to sTRAIL treatment previously observed (Fig. 2d). Furthermore, no effects on TRAIL-R2 membrane exposure were detected following siCHKB (Fig. S4A).

Fig. 5

CHKA silencing increased TRAIL-R2 membrane expression and triggering/function. a. Expression of total TRAIL-R2 protein assessed by both flow cytometry after cells permeabilization (left panel) and Western blotting (right panel) in siCHKA and siNT cell lines. b. Membrane surface expression of TRAIL-R2 detected by flow cytometry after CHKA silencing and recovery of ChoKα expression. In both A and B, representative experiments are shown. Fluorescence index are reported. C. Percentage of growth inhibition obtained following 16 h treatment with specific anti-TRAIL-R2 agonist antibody; asterisks are referred to statistically significant differences

In order to assess whether the observed sensitization to apoptosis was specifically related to TRAIL-R2 upregulation we checked gene and membrane expression of the other TRAIL-R family members. While a global increase of TNFRSF10B was evident in all siCHKA cells, different variations without univocal trend in transcript expression were observed for TNFRSF10A/TRAIL-R1, TNFRSF10C/TRAIL-R3 and TNFRSF10/TRAIL-R4 (Fig. S4B). Parallel flow cytometry analysis showed no evident alteration of TRAIL-R1, R3, R4 membrane expression in siCHKA cells compared to controls (Fig. S4C). Most importantly, the specific involvement of TRAIL-R2 in sensitization to apoptosis following siCHKA was confirmed by using a specific anti-TRAIL-R2 agonist antibody [10] (Fig. 5c).

CHKA silencing promotes TRAIL-R2 relocation in functional membrane microdomains

Notably, the effects of treatment with both anti-TRAIL-R2 agonist antibody and sTRAIL were evident also in siCHKA OAW42 (Fig. 2d) that, apparently, failed to up-regulate TRAIL-R2 membrane expression (Fig. 5b). We thus hypothesized that mechanisms inherent to membrane architecture and plasticity could be involved. Flow cytometry analysis for TRAIL-R2 expression was therefore performed at 37° rather than 4 °C in order to mimic the physiological conditions of cell culturing. With this approach an increase of TRAIL-R2 membrane expression (but not of any other member of TRAIL, Fig. S4D) was evident also on siCHKA OAW42 cells (Fig. 6a).

Fig. 6

CHKA silencing promoted TRAIL-R2 membrane relocation. a. Representative flow cytometry analysis indicating TRAIL-R2 membrane expression following primary antibody incubation at 37 °C in siCHKA and control OC cell lines. Fluorescence index are reported. b. Representative Western blotting analysis of TX-soluble and TX-insoluble fractions for TRAIL-R2 expression after CHKA silencing (left panel) and following recovery of ChoKα expression (middle panel): Cav-1 and Flot-1 were used as markers of TX-insoluble fractions. Right panel: densitometric analysis of relative TRAIL-R2 relocation in TX-insoluble fraction following silencing (white bars) and recovery of Chokα (black bars)

A possible TRAIL-R2 relocation in specific membrane microdomains may promote an efficient cell death signaling process [32]. Accordingly, we verified that following siCHKA there was an increase (from 1,3 to 1,5 fold) in the relative amount of TRAIL-R2 in the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction of lysates corresponding to lipid rafts (Fig. 6b, left panel). Interestingly, following the recovery of Chokα expression after transient silencing (Fig. S2A), no appreciable differences in the relative TRAIL-R2 distribution in Triton X-100-insoluble fraction were detected between siCHKA-recovered and control cells (Fig. 6b, middle panel).

TRAIL-R2 increase induced by siCHKA may be a suitable TAA for lymphocyte retargeting

Since we recently showed [29] that a bispecific antibody (bsAb) directed to TRAIL-R2 as TAA and to CD3 as triggering molecule, can efficiently redirect CD3+ T lymphocytes cytotoxicity toward cancer cells (Fig. 7a), we explored if the increase of TRAIL-R2 following siCHKA could also result in an improvement of the bsAb-mediated T cell anticancer activity. To obtain a proof of principle of a clinically relevant application of this effect, we tested the ability of the bsAb to retarget the cytotoxic activity of autologous lymphocytes against ex vivo OC cells derived from patients’ ascitic fluid silenced for CHKA (Fig. S5A). Also in this ex vivo cellular model, siCHKA induced a consistent increase of TRAIL-R2 membrane exposure (Fig. 7b) thus allowing sensitization of patients-derived cancer cells to bsAb-mediated lymphocyte retargeting with a significant increase of growth inhibition (Fig. 7c).

Fig. 7

TRAIL-R2 induced by siCHKA as TAA for retargeting of lymphocyte cytotoxicity by anti-TRAIL-R2/anti-CD3 bispecific antibody. a. Cartoon depicting the retargeting of lymphocyte against siCHKA ex vivo OC cells expressing TRAIL-R2, by anti-TRAIL-R2/anti-CD3 bispecific antibody (bsAb). b. Representative flow cytometry analysis indicating TRAIL-R2 membrane expression in siCHKA and siNT ex vivo patient-derived ascitic tumor cells. Fluorescence index are reported. c. Percentage of growth inhibition of patients-derived ex vivo siCHKA and control OC cells in the presence of anti-TRAIL-R2/anti-CD3 bsAb, lymphocytes alone (PBLs) or their combination; asterisks are referred to a statistically significant difference


We previously contributed to demonstrate that ChoKα/CHKA is involved in the maintenance of OC aggressiveness and drug resistance [23, 24]. Here we show that CHKA silencing (siCHKA), by increasing TRAIL-R2 membrane expression and availability interferes also with OC cells susceptibility to receptor-mediated apoptosis efficiently overcoming TRAIL resistance in vitro and redirecting ex vivo lymphocytes cytotoxicity triggered by bsAb to TRAIL-R2/CD3.

TNFRSF10B/TRAIL-R2 is a TNF-related membrane receptor whose triggering by its ligand (TRAIL) transmits the apoptotic signal in cancer cells sparing normal cells [33, 34]. This peculiar characteristic opened a therapeutic window for the development of new cancer therapeutics [35, 36]. However, despite promising in vitro and preclinical results demonstrating successful antitumor activity with low side effects, lack of a therapeutic outcome has been observed in clinical trials [37]. The major limitation to TRAIL-targeted therapy is the acquisition of apoptosis escape mechanisms that prevent TRAIL-mediated killing of tumor cells [38] including OC [9].

Reasonably, a big effort is devoted to search for appropriate combinatorial treatments to overcome resistance effects [39] and vulnerability of tumor cells to specific amminoacid deficiency [40, 41] could offer new targeting approaches. In particular, methionine restriction has been shown to enhance efficacy of anti-tumor cytotoxic agents [42] or apoptotic response [43] and interestingly, the upregulation of TRAIL-R2 was described in different tumor models [12--14]. We have already evidence that in OC cell lines CHKA silencing perturbed metabolic circuitry related to one-carbon cycles [24, 25] and our current data showed a decrease in methionine together with an increase in TNFRSF10B in siCHKA cells. A significant inverse correlation between CHKA and TNFRSF10B expression was observed in the in silico analysis of more than 300 OC samples at different grade of malignancy. Consistent with our previous data [19], CHKA expression increased along with malignancy while a corresponding decrease of TNFRSF10B was evident, thus supporting the notion that the cholinic phenotype might interfere with TRAIL receptors expression. In OC models the sensitization to TRAIL-dependent apoptosis mainly relied on ChoKα-related expression and functions rather than on methionine deprivation. Indeed, while the recovery of ChoKα expression in siCHKA cells caused the complete reversion to the resistant phenotype, methionine deprivation had only a minor effect on TRAIL-sensitivity. In addition, OC sensitivity to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis was not modified by siCHKB further supporting previous findings showing that harnessing of OC aggressiveness is a peculiar characteristic of siCHKA [23, 24].

In all three cellular models selected as TRAIL resistant, siCHKA-dependent sensitization to TRAIL-mediated cell death relied on activation of extrinsic apoptotic pathway as demonstrated by the reversion of apoptosis by Caspase-8 specific inhibition. Furthermore, apoptosis appears to be exclusively related to TRAIL-R2 membrane availability since we did not observed a consistent up-modulation of TRAIL-R1 or down-modulation of the decoy receptors TRAIL-R3 and R4. We also demonstrated the effectiveness of siCHKA in up-modulating TRAIL-R2 ex vivo in tumor cells derived from OC patients’ ascitic fluids. Late stages OC present with abundant malignant ascites rich of cellular components (tumor and non tumor cells) and pro-tumor soluble factors [44, 45] able to attenuate TRAIL-induced apoptosis and counterattack apoptotic signaling [46, 47]. By using a bsAb directed against TRAIL-R2 as TAA and the T cell receptor associated CD3 as triggering molecule, we were able to induce the killing of cancer cells grown in a pro-tumor microenvironment using autologous lymphocytes mimicking a real human in vivo situation [10, 29].

The majority of OC cell lines selected for our analyses were TRAIL resistant without a correlation with basal TRAIL-R2 expression level. Notably in the siCHKA OAW42 cell line that clearly acquired a TRAIL-sensitive phenotype, TRAIL-R2 membrane expression became evident only following incubation at 37 °C suggesting the involvement of membrane plasticity. Moreover, we observed in all the siCHKA cell lines a general increase of the relative amount of TRAIL-R2 located in specific membrane microdomains correspondent to lipid rafts [32] and the loss of TRAIL-R2 relocation following recovery of ChoKα expression. In these microdomains, which are known regulatory platform of membrane-associated signaling molecules since proteins have limited ability to diffuse over plasma membrane, protein-protein interactions are facilitated and death receptors signaling is favored [32]. These observations, in line with the pivotal role of ChoKα in phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis, suggested that ChoKα impairment could possibly modulate phospholipids homeostasis thus affecting overall membranes architecture and properties (plasticity). This phenomenon could favor TRAIL-R2 relocation into lipid rafts facilitating death receptor triggering and execution of the apoptotic signaling.


We demonstrated the involvement of the cholinic phenotype in regulation of death receptors expression and overall susceptibility of OC cell to their triggering. Our data by confirming previous observation obtained in a colorectal cancer model [48], overall foster the potential usefulness of ChoKα targeting in a clinical setting.

ChoK-α impairment, by simultaneously interfering with multiple mechanisms on which tumor cells rely for proliferation/survival, would reduce the fitness of tumor cells making them more vulnerable to external stress. The consequential weakness is expected to ultimately reduce the ability of OC cells to resist to drug and/or cytokine treatments.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during in this study are included in this published article.



Bispecific antibody


Choline Kinase alpha


Gene Expression Omnibus repository


Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry


Low malignant potential


Ovarian cancer


Ovarian surface epithelium


Periferal blood lymphocytes




CHKA silencing


CHKB silencing


No-target silencing


soluble TRAIL


Tumor associate antigen


Tumor necrosis factor


TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand


TRAIL receptors


Triton X-100


  1. 1.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lheureux S, Gourley C, Vergote I, Oza AM. Epithelial ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2019;393:1240–53.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Galluzzi L, Senovilla L, Vitale I, Michels J, Martins I, Kepp O, Castedo M, Kroemer G. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance. Oncogene. 2012;31:1869–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mezzanzanica D, Balladore E, Turatti F, et al. CD95-mediated apoptosis is impaired at receptor level by cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (long form) in wild-type p53 human ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5202–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bagnoli M, Balladore E, Luison E, Alberti P, Raspagliesi F, Marcomini B, Canevari S, Mezzanzanica D. Sensitization of p53-mutated epithelial ovarian cancer to CD95-mediated apoptosis is synergistically induced by cisplatin pretreatment. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:762–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bagnoli M, Ambrogi F, Pilotti S, Alberti P, Ditto A, Barbareschi M, Galligioni E, Biganzoli E, Canevari S, Mezzanzanica D. C-FLIPL expression defines two ovarian cancer patient subsets and is a prognostic factor of adverse outcome. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2009;16:443–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Almasan A, Ashkenazi A. Apo2L/TRAIL: apoptosis signaling, biology, and potential for cancer therapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003;14:337–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Trivedi R, Mishra DP. Trailing TRAIL resistance: novel targets for TRAIL sensitization in cancer cells. Front Oncol. 2015;5:69.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bevis KS, Buchsbaum DJ, Straughn JM Jr. Overcoming TRAIL resistance in ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119:157–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Satta A, Grazia G, Caroli F, et al. A bispecific antibody to link a TRAIL-based antitumor approach to immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2514.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hanahan D, Weinberg R. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Strekalova E, Malin D, Good DM, Cryns VL. Methionine deprivation induces a targetable vulnerability in triple-negative breast cancer cells by enhancing TRAIL receptor-2 expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2780–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kokkinakis DM, Liu X, Chada S, Ahmed MM, Shareef MM, Singha UK, Yang S, Luo J. Modulation of gene expression in human central nervous system tumors under methionine deprivation-induced stress. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7513–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yamamoto J, Miyake K, Han Q, et al. Oral recombinant methioninase increases TRAIL receptor-2 expression to regress pancreatic cancer in combination with agonist tigatuzumab in an orthotopic mouse model. Cancer Lett. 2020.

  15. 15.

    Sreedhar A, Zhao Y. Dysregulated metabolic enzymes and metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells. Biomed Rep. 2018;8:3–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ward P, Thompson C. Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer hallmark even Warburg did not anticipate. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:297–308.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Glunde K, Bhujwalla ZM, Ronen SM. Choline metabolism in malignant transformation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:835–48.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Iorio E, Mezzanzanica D, Alberti P, et al. Alterations of choline phospholipid metabolism in ovarian tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9369–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Iorio E, Ricci A, Bagnoli M, et al. Activation of phosphatidylcholine cycle enzymes in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70:2126–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wu G, Aoyama C, Young SG, Vance DE. Early embryonic lethality caused by disruption of the gene for choline kinase alpha, the first enzyme in phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:1456–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mori N, Glunde K, Takagi T, Raman V, Bhujwalla ZM. Choline kinase down-regulation increases the effect of 5-fluorouracil in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11284–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bagnoli M, Granata A, Nicoletti R, Krishnamachary B, Bhujwalla ZM, Canese R, Podo F, Canevari S, Iorio E, Mezzanzanica D. Choline metabolism alteration: a focus on ovarian cancer. Front Oncol. 2016;6:153.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Granata A, Nicoletti R, Tinaglia V, et al. Choline kinase-alpha by regulating cell aggressiveness and drug sensitivity is a potential druggable target for ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:330–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Granata A, Nicoletti R, Perego P, et al. Global metabolic profile identifies choline kinase alpha as a key regulator of glutathione-dependent antioxidant cell defense in ovarian carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6:11216–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rizzo A, Napoli A, Roggiani F, Tomassetti A, Bagnoli M, Mezzanzanica D. One-carbon metabolism: Biological players in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19.

  26. 26.

    Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, Cope LM, Hobbs B, Speed TP. Summaries of affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:e15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    De Cecco L, Bossi P, Locati L, Canevari S, Licitra L. Comprehensive gene expression meta-analysis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma microarray data defines a robust survival predictor. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:1628–35.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bagnoli M, Tomassetti A, Figini M, Flati S, Dolo V, Canevari S, Miotti S. Downmodulation of caveolin-1 expression in human ovarian carcinoma is directly related to alpha-folate receptor overexpression. Oncogene. 2000;19:4754–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Satta A, Mezzanzanica D, Caroli F, et al. Design, selection and optimization of an anti-TRAIL-R2/anti-CD3 bispecific antibody able to educate T cells to recognize and destroy cancer cells. MAbs. 2018;10:1084–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ducker GS, Rabinowitz JD. One-carbon metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab. 2017;25:27–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ashkenazi A, Dixit VM. Apoptosis control by death and decoy receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999;11:255–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Simons K, Toomre D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1:31–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gura T. How TRAIL kills cancer cells, but not normal cells. Science. 1997;277:768.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Deng D, Shah K. TRAIL of hope meeting resistance in cancer, trends Cancer; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Walczak H, Miller RE, Ariail K, et al. Tumoricidal activity of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vivo. Nat Med. 1999;5:157–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yagita H, Takeda K, Hayakawa Y, Smyth MJ, Okumura K. TRAIL and its receptors as targets for cancer therapy. Cancer Sci. 2004;95:777–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Dyer MJ, MacFarlane M, Cohen GM. Barriers to effective TRAIL-targeted therapy of malignancy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4505–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhang L, Fang B. Mechanisms of resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2005;12:228–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    von Karstedt S, Montinaro A, Walczak H. Exploring the TRAILs less travelled: TRAIL in cancer biology and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:352–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Maddocks OD, Berkers CR, Mason SM, Zheng L, Blyth K, Gottlieb E, Vousden KH. Serine starvation induces stress and p53-dependent metabolic remodelling in cancer cells. Nature. 2013;493:542–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mecham JO, Rowitch D, Wallace CD, Stern PH, Hoffman RM. The metabolic defect of methionine dependence occurs frequently in human tumor cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1983;117:429–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Poirson-Bichat F, Goncalves RA, Miccoli L, Dutrillaux B, Poupon MF. Methionine depletion enhances the antitumoral efficacy of cytotoxic agents in drug-resistant human tumor xenografts. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:643–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lu S, Hoestje SM, Choo E, Epner DE. Induction of caspase-dependent and -independent apoptosis in response to methionine restriction. Int J Oncol. 2003;22:415–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Mills GB, May C, Hill M, Campbell S, Shaw P, Marks A. Ascitic fluid from human ovarian cancer patients contains growth factors necessary for intraperitoneal growth of human ovarian adenocarcinoma cells. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:851–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kipps E, Tan DS, Kaye SB. Meeting the challenge of ascites in ovarian cancer: new avenues for therapy and research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:273–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lane D, Robert V, Grondin R, Rancourt C, Piche A. Malignant ascites protect against TRAIL-induced apoptosis by activating the PI3K/akt pathway in human ovarian carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:1227–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lane D, Goncharenko-Khaider N, Rancourt C, Piche A. Ovarian cancer ascites protects from TRAIL-induced cell death through alphavbeta5 integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase and akt activation. Oncogene. 2010;29:3519–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lacal J, Andera L. Choline kinase inhibitors synergize with TRAIL in the treatment of colorectal tumors and overcomes TRAIL resistance. Cancer Transl Med. 2016;2:163–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank: Mrs. Paola Alberti for her excellent technical support; Dr. Paola Gnocchi (Nerviano Medical Sciences S.r.l. Oncology; Nerviano - MI - Italy) for helpful discussion.


This study is supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (IG-17475 to DM: MCO9998 to MF as group leader), Italian Ministry of Health (RF 2016–02363995 to DM and 5 × 1000 Funds—2013 to MB), and Oncologic Program Grant (ISS-13ONC/5 to EI).

Author information




conception and design of the study DM MB. data acquisition AR FR AS GG AC AN MF LDC. analysis and interpretation AR LDC AT MB DM. drafting the article or critical revision AR AT EI DM MB. final approval of the version to be submitted ALL AUTHORS

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delia Mezzanzanica.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethic Committee of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rizzo, A., Satta, A., Garrone, G. et al. Choline kinase alpha impairment overcomes TRAIL resistance in ovarian cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 40, 5 (2021).

Download citation


  • Ovarian cancer
  • Choline kinase
  • Metabolic alterations
  • Apoptosis resistance