Open Access

Impact of relative dose intensity (RDI) in CHOP combined with rituximab (R-CHOP) on survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

  • Yoshiki Terada1Email author,
  • Hirohisa Nakamae1,
  • Ran Aimoto1,
  • Hiroshi Kanashima2,
  • Erina Sakamoto2,
  • Mizuki Aimoto1,
  • Eri Inoue1,
  • Hideo Koh1,
  • Takahiko Nakane1,
  • Yasunobu Takeoka1,
  • Masahiko Ohsawa3,
  • Ki-Ryang Koh1,
  • Takahisa Yamane1,
  • Yoshitaka Nakao4,
  • Kensuke Ohta5,
  • Atsuko Mugitani6,
  • Hirofumi Teshima2 and
  • Masayuki Hino1
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research200928:116

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-28-116

Received: 1 May 2009

Accepted: 19 August 2009

Published: 19 August 2009

Abstract

Background

Recently, maintaining higher relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapeutic drugs has become a widespread practice in an attempt to achieve better outcomes in the treatment of aggressive lymphoma. The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy regimens has significantly improved outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBL). However, it is unknown if higher RDI in chemotherapy when combined with rituximab leads to a better outcome in aggressive B-cell lymphoma.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the impact of the RDI of initial chemotherapy (consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone with rituximab (R-CHOP) on outcome in 100 newly diagnosed DLBL patients.

Results

A multivariate Cox regression model showed that RDI trended towards a significant association with mortality [hazard ratio per 0.1 of RDI = 0.8; 95% confidence interval 0.6–1.0; P = 0.08]. Additionally, on multivariate logistic analysis, advanced age was a significant factor for reduced RDI.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that in DLBL patients, mortality was affected by RDI of R-CHOP as the initial treatment, and the retention of a high RDI could therefore be crucial.

Background

Aggressive lymphoma is known to be a highly chemosensitive disease. Therefore, over the past few decades, constant attempts have been made to develop various types of combination chemotherapy including first generation combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) [1]. However, particularly in patients with aggressive lymphoma in the higher International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk group, satisfactory outcomes have not been achieved, with a five-year survival of less than 50% [2].

Several retrospective studies demonstrated that the relative dose intensity (RDI) of combination chemotherapy significantly influences survival in aggressive lymphoma [37].

Moreover, rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody combined with CHOP chemotherapy (R-CHOP) has improved outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBL) [8, 9]. Rituximab has direct, complement-dependent and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against B-cells. The drug also sensitizes B-lymphoma cells to chemotherapy [10]. Therefore, a combined approach with rituximab plus CHOP could conceivably modify the effects of RDI. However, there is no evidence that even in combination chemotherapy with rituximab that higher RDI improves the outcome for aggressive B-cell type lymphoma. Hence, in our study, we retrospectively analyzed the impact of the RDI of chemotherapy with R-CHOP as an initial treatment on the survival of patients with DLBL, and furthermore, we determined the factors influencing RDI.

Methods

Eligibility

Patients were eligible if they had newly diagnosed DLBL according to the World Health Organization classification or the Revised European-American Lymphoma classification [11, 12]. As initial chemotherapy, they received R-CHOP with more than three consecutive courses between December 2003 and February 2008 at five institutions, Osaka City University Hospital, Osaka City General Hospital, Seichokai Fuchu Hospital, Saiseikai Nakatu Hospital and Wakakoukai Hospital. One hundred patients who had complete records of drug dose, time intervals, and prophylactic G-CSF use were deemed eligible for this study. Patients were excluded if they had T-cell lymphoma or prior radiotherapy before CHOP. Clinical data and follow-up information were obtained by reviewing the patients' medical records. All patients provided written informed consent for their treatment.

Patient Characteristics

We analyzed 100 newly diagnosed DLBL patients treated with initial R-CHOP chemotherapy. The clinical characteristics of all the patients are shown in Table 1. Median age of the patients was 60 years. Of the 100 patients, 45 were 61 years or older. Sixty-two patients had advanced-stage (stage III, IV) disease, and 23 patients had poor performance status (PS). In 52 patients, lactate dehydrogenase level (LDH) was high (over the upper limit of normal). Thirty-two patients had two or more extranodal disease sites. Forty-two patients were in the higher IPI risk group (high or high-intermediate risk group). In 26 patients, serum albumin levels were < 3.5 g/dl. The median number of CHOP courses was 6 (range, 3–8). The median number of R-CHOP cycles for patients with localized disease was 6 (range, 3–8), and there was no significant difference in the number of cycles between patients with localized disease and those with advanced disease.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

 

n. (%)

Total number of patients

100

Age

 

   < 61

55 (55)

   ≥ 61

45 (45)

Clinical Stage

 

   I, II

38 (38)

   III, IV

62 (62)

Performance status

 

   0–1

77 (77)

   2–4

23 (23)

LDH

 

   N≥

52 (52)

   N <

48 (48)

Extranodal lesion

 

   0–1

68 (68)

   2–4

32 (32)

IPI

 

   Low/low-intermediate

58 (58)

   High/high-intermediate

42 (42)

Albumin

 

   < 3.5 g/dl

26 (26)

   ≥3.5 g/dl

74 (74)

Prophylactic G-CSF

 

   yes

62 (62)

   no

38 (38)

N: normal range; IPI: international prognostic index; G-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

Chemotherapy Regimen

The CHOP chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2 given intravenously on Day 1), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 given intravenously on Day 1), vincristine (1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg/body), given intravenously on Day 1) and prednisolone (100 mg/day, given orally on Day 1 to 5) [13]. The treatment course was repeated every three weeks, unless peripheral leukocyte or platelet counts became too low to administer the next cycle. A time limit for peripheral blood count recovery before administration of the next cycle of chemotherapy was not adopted. In patients who experienced severe neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and/or infections, or febrile neutropenia during cycles, the doses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine in the subsequent cycle were reduced at the discretion of clinical physicians. Moreover, the dose of vincristine was also reduced depending on the occurrence and degree of neurologic toxicity. Rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m2 per cycle for up to 8 cycles concurrently with CHOP, as long as the disease responded to the treatment. Seven patients received involved-field radiation therapy of 30–40 Gy.

G-CSF was given if patients experienced neutropenia with an absolute neutrophil count of less than 500/μl during cycles. Prophylactic G-CSF was administered at the physician's discretion to prevent the development of neutropenia in 62 patients who had experienced infections associated with neutropenia in the prior cycle [14]. In these patients, the median number of CHOP cycles with prophylactic G-CSF was 3 (range, 1–6).

Calculation of Dose Intensity (DI)

The DI of each agent was calculated by dividing the total received dose of the agent by the number of weeks of treatment [3]. The relative total dose intensity (RTDI) of each agent was calculated by expressing the total delivered dose of agent per unit time (week) as a percentage of the target dose. The averaged RDI (ARDI) was calculated by expressing the average delivered dose of the chemotherapy regimen per unit time (week) as a percentage of the target dose. In this study, the ARDI was calculated by averaging the RTDIs of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin in all the chemotherapy courses, and hereinafter the ARDI of R-CHOP is simply referred to as the "RDI."

Statistical Methods

Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the initiation of R-CHOP chemotherapy to the time of death or to the time of the last follow-up. Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated from the initiation of R-CHOP chemotherapy to the time of relapse, progression, death or the last follow-up. Both OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves of the different groups were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to assess the effects of the pretreatment prognostic factors on overall survival [15]. Multiple logistic analysis was applied to identify factors influencing RDI. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant, and all tests were two-tailed. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 15.0 J (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

Results

RDI

In all patients, the calculated medians of the RTDI of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide were 88.8% and 88.6%, respectively and the median RDI for all cycles of R-CHOP given was 87.9%.

Survival Analysis

We registered 14 deaths. With a median follow-up of 21.2 months, the three-year OS in all cases, in the group with a higher RDI (above the median) and in the group with a lower RDI (below the median) was 81.6%, 92.1% and 74.2%, respectively (Figure 1). The three-year PFS in all cases, in the group with a higher RDI (above the median) and in the group with a lower RDI (below the median) was 56.3%, 58.7% and 54.0%, respectively.
Figure 1

Overall survival curves of the higher RDI (≥ median) and the lower RDI (< median) group. RDI: relative dose intensity (RDI) of R-CHOP chemotherapy.

In the univariate analysis to identify prognostic factors for OS, RDI and IPI were significant factors influencing OS. In a multivariate analysis, RDI tended to be a significant risk factor for mortality [hazard ratio (HR) per 0.1 of RDI = 0.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6–1.0; P = 0.08] (Table 2).
Table 2

Prognostic factors for overall survival

 

Univariate model

Multivariate model

Factor

HR (95%CI)

P value

HR (95%CI)

P value

Age (61 ≤)

2.2 (0.8–6.7)

0.15

-

-

Sex (male)

2.6 (0.7–9.3)

0.14

-

-

Stage III, IV

7.6 (1.0–5.8)

0.15

-

-

Extranodal site (2 ≤)

1.7 (0.6–4.8)

0.35

-

-

LDH (> upper normal limit)

1.8 (0.5–5.8)

0.34

-

-

Performance status (2–4)

2.8 (1.0–8.1)

0.05

-

-

RDI (CPA+DOX) per 0.1

0.7 (0.6–0.9)

0.02*

0.8 (0.6–1.0)

0.08

IPI (high/high intermediate)

4.7 (1.3–17)

0.02*

3.8 (1.0–14)

0.05

Albumin (3.5 mg/dl ≤)

0.7 (0.4–1.2)

0.20

-

-

Prophylactic G-CSF

1.6 (0.5–4.9)

0.44

-

-

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; RDI: relative dose intensity; CPA: cyclophosphamide; DOX: doxorubicin; G-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

Factors Influencing RDI

The univariate analyses identified advanced age and higher IPI score as risk factors for reduced RDI. In the multivariate logistic analysis of all these factors, only older age remained as a factor that retained persistent statistical significance [odds ratio (OR) = 0.4; 95% CI 0.2–0.8; P = 0.02]. (Table 3).
Table 3

Factors influencing RDI (above the Median): Univariate and Multivariate analysis

 

Univariate model

Multivariate model 1

Multivariate model 2

Factor

OR (95%CI)

P value

OR (95%CI)

P value

OR (95%CI)

P value

Age (61 ≤)

0.3(0.2–0.8)

0.0099*

0.4 (0.2–0.8)

0.06

0.4 (0.2–0.8)

0.02*

Sex (male)

1.3 (0.6–2.9)

0.54

-

-

-

-

Stage III, IV

0.8 (0.4–1.9)

0.68

-

-

-

-

Extranodal site (2 ≤)

1.0 (0.4–2.3)

1.00

-

-

-

-

LDH (> upper normal limit)

0.5 (0.2–1.2)

0.11

-

-

0.6 (0.3–1.4)

0.24

Performance status (2–4)

0.6 (0.2–1.5)

0.24

-

-

-

-

IPI (high/high intermediate)

0.4 (0.2–1.0)

0.04*

0.6 (0.3–1.6)

0.33

-

-

Alb (3.5 mg/dl >)

0.8 (0.5–1.4)

0.50

-

-

-

-

Prophylactic G-CSF +

1.7 (0.7–3.8)

0.22

-

-

-

-

IPI: international prognostic index. G-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

Discussion

In DLBL patients, our data demonstrated that a high RDI of CHOP trended towards a significant association with better survival, even when the CHOP was combined with rituximab. Only advanced age was identified as a risk factor for reduced RDI.

There are several previous studies of the relationship between the RDI of chemotherapy and survival in aggressive lymphoma. A high RDI of doxorubicin in CHOP, M-BACOD, or MACOP-B chemotherapy [4], a high RDI of each drug (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin or vincristine) and a high averaged RDI of these three drugs in CHOP for diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) reportedly had a significant, positive impact on survival [5]. In addition, in ACVB chemotherapy for aggressive lymphoma, the averaged RDI of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide was strongly associated with survival [6]. Furthermore, it was reported that in elderly patients with DLCL who received a higher dose of doxorubicin, the outcomes were comparable to those of young patients [16]. In a recent study, a Belgian group also reported that maintaining a high RDI resulted in a favorable outcome in CHOP chemotherapy for DLBL patients [7].

The addition of rituximab to CHOP or other chemotherapy regimens has reportedly led to a significant improvement in the prognosis of DLBL patients. Interestingly, it was suggested from preclinical models that rituximab chemosensitized drug-resistant B-lymphoma cells through down-regulation of anti-apoptotic factors and endogenous IL-10 expression [17, 18], suggesting that rituximab is likely to have a significant therapeutic effect by augmenting the effect of anticancer agents in CHOP in a synergistic fashion and thereby compensating for a low CHOP RDI. However, from our results, it was clear that maintaining a high RDI remained crucial in the use of R-CHOP for DLBL patients, in a similar fashion to CHOP alone.

We identified advanced age as the only factor that reduced RDI. A nationwide study of RDI in CHOP-like chemotherapies in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in the United States also showed that older age was a risk factors for reduced RDI, in addition to lack of use of prophylactic colony stimulating factor (CSF), advanced disease stage, poor PS and a lower serum albumin level [19]. Moreover, the study indicated that prophylactic CSF use is important in maintaining a high RDI, particularly in elderly patients. The American Society of Clinical Oncology update guideline for the use of CSF, also recommends use of prophylactic CSF during curative and intensive chemotherapy for elderly patients with DLCL, to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia and infections [14]. In addition, according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer guideline on the use of G-CSF, when dose-dense or dose-intense chemotherapy has a survival benefit, prophylactic G-CSF use is recommended, especially in elderly patients [20]. Indeed, in a prospective study on prediction of febrile neutropenia in the first cycle of chemotherapy for NHL, elderly patients were identified as candidates for primary CSF prophylaxis [21]. Taking into account these reports as well as our results, prophylactic use of CSF could be recommend, at least in elderly patients with DLBL who are scheduled to receive R-CHOP chemotherapy in order to maintain RDI.

As our study was a retrospective cohort study with a small study population and/or short median follow-up periods, it was inevitable that treatment bias due to physician discretion in making treatment decisions would arise. Therefore, prospective randomized trials will be required to confirm the value of maintaining a high RDI. For instance, an alternative strategy to intensify RDI by shortening the intervals between cycles of chemotherapy, such as bi-weekly CHOP, may be promising [22]. Indeed, Groupe d'Etudes de Lymphomes de L'Adulte (GELA) is now conducting a phase III prospective randomized trial to assess the difference between eight cycles of bi-weekly R-CHOP and three-weekly R-CHOP. The results of this prospective randomized trial are awaited.

Conclusion

In DLBL patients, mortality was affected by the RDI of R-CHOP as the initial treatment and the retention of high RDI could be crucial, especially in elderly patients. To optimize the RDI of conventional chemotherapy in order to achieve better outcomes for patients with DLBL, further investigation of RDI will be required.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thanks for clinical research nurse. Yukari Umemoto (Hematology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan) for assistance in obtaining clinical data and follow-up information.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hematology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University
(2)
Department of Hematology, Osaka City General Hospital
(3)
Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University
(4)
Department of Hematology, Wakakoukai Hospital
(5)
Department of Hematology, Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital
(6)
Department of Hematology, Seichokai Fuchu Hospital

References

  1. Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, Oken MM, Grogan TM, Mize EM, Glick JH, Coltman CA, Miller TP: Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1993, 328: 1002-6. 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project: A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1993, 329: 987-94. 10.1056/NEJM199309303291402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Epelbaum R, Haim N, Ben-Shahar M, Ron Y, Cohen Y: Dose intensity analysis for CHOP chemotherapy in diffuse aggressive large cell lymphoma. Isr J Med Sci. 1990, 24: 533-8.Google Scholar
  4. Kwak LW, Halpern J, Olshen RA, Horning SJ: Prognostic significance of actual dose intensity in diffuse large-cell lymphoma: Results of a tree-structured survival analysis. J Clin Oncol. 1990, 8: 963-77.Google Scholar
  5. Epelbaum R, Faraggi D, Ben-Arie Y, Ben-Shahar M, Haim N, Ron Y, Robinson E, Cohen Y: Survival of diffuse large cell lymphoma. A multivariate analysis including dose intensity variables. Cancer. 1990, 66: 1124-9. 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:6<1124::AID-CNCR2820660608>3.0.CO;2-T.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Lepage E, Gisselbrecht C, Haioun C, Sebban C, Tilly H, Bosly A, Morel P, Herbrecht R, Reyes F, Coiffier B: Prognostic significance of received relative dose intensity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: Application to LNH-87 protocol: The GELA (Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte). Ann Oncol. 1993, 4: 651-6.Google Scholar
  7. Bosly A, Bron D, Van Hoof A, De Bock R, Berneman Z, Ferrant A, Kaufman L, Dauwe M, Verhoef G: Achievement of optimal average relative dose intensity and correlation with survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CHOP. Ann Hematol. 2008, 87: 277-83. 10.1007/s00277-007-0399-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, Morel P, Neste Van Den E, Salles G, Gaulard P, Reyes F, Lederlin P, Gisselbrecht C: CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346: 235-42. 10.1056/NEJMoa011795.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Osterborg A, Pettengell R, Trneny M, Imrie K, Ma D, Gill D, Walewski J, Zinzani PL, Stahel R, Kvaloy S, Shpilberg O, Jaeger U, Hansen M, Lehtinen T, Lopez-Guillermo A, Corrado C, Scheliga A, Milpied N, Mendila M, Rashford M, Kuhnt E, Loeffler M, MabThera International Trial Group: CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. Lancet Oncology. 2006, 7: 379-91. 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70664-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Demidem A, Lam T, Alas S, Hariharan K, Hanna N, Banavida B: Chimeric anti-CD20 (IDEC-C2B8) monoclonal antibody sensitizes a B cell lymphoma cell line to cell killing by cytotoxic drugs. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 1997, 12: 177-186. 10.1089/cbr.1997.12.177.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Vardiman J, Stein H: Pathology and genetics: neoplasms of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Edited by: Kleihues P, Sobin LH. 2001, Lyon: IARC Press, 237-53.Google Scholar
  12. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, Banks PM, Chan JK, Cleary ML, Delsol G, De Wolf-Peeters C, Falini B, Gatter KC: A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 1994, 84: 1361-92.Google Scholar
  13. McKelvey EM, Gottlieb JA, Wilson HE, Haut A, Talley RW, Stephens R, Lane M, Gamble JF, Jones SE, Grozea PN, Gutterman J, Coltman C, Moon TE: Hydroxyldaunomycin (Adriamycin) combination chemotherapy in malignant lymphoma. Cancer. 1976, 38: 1484-93. 10.1002/1097-0142(197610)38:4<1484::AID-CNCR2820380407>3.0.CO;2-I.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, Ozer H, Armitage JO, Balducci L, Bennett Charles, Cantor Scott, Crawford Jeffrey, Cross Scott, Demetri George, Desch Christopher, Pizzo Philip, Schiffer Charles, Schwartzberg Lee, Somerfield Mark, Somlo George, Wade James, Wade James, Winn Rodger, Wozniak Antoinette, Wolff Antonio: 2006 Update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 1: 3187-205. 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4451.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox DR: Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B. 1972, 34: 187-220.Google Scholar
  16. Lee KW, Kim DY, Yun T, Kim DW, Kim TY, Yoon SS, Heo DS, Bang YJ, Park S, Kim BK, Kim NK: Doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in elderly patients: Comparison of treatment outcomes between young and elderly patients and the significance of doxorubicin dosage. Cancer. 2003, 98: 2651-6. 10.1002/cncr.11846.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Vega MI, Huerta-Yepaz S, Garban H, Jazirehi A, Emmanouilides C, Bonavida B: Rituximab inhibits p38 MAPK activity in 2F7 B NHL and decreases IL-10 transcription: pivotal role of p38 MAPK in drug resistance. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 3530-40. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Alas S, Bonavida B: Rituximab inactivates signal transducer and activation of transcription 3 (STAT3) activity in B-non-Hodgkin's lymphoma through inhibition of the interleukin 10 autocrine/paracrine loop and results in down-regulation of Bcl-2 and sensitization to cytotoxic drugs. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 5137-44.Google Scholar
  19. Lyman GH, Dale DC, Friedberg J, Crawford J, Fisher RI: Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a nationwide study. Journal of Clin Oncol. 2004, 22: 4302-11. 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.213.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Aapro MS, Cameron DA, Pettengell R, Bohlius J, Crawford J, Ellis M, Kearney N, Lyman GH, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Walewski J, Weber DC, Zielinski C, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Guidelines Working Party: EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2006, 42: 2433-53. 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Pettengell Ruth, Bosly André, Szucs Thomas, Jackisch Christian, Leonard Robert, Paridaens Robert, Constenla Manuel, Schwenkglenks Matthias: Multivariate analysis of febrile neutropenia occurrence in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: data from the INC-EU Prospective Observational European Neutropenia Study. British Journal of Haematology. 2009, 144: 677-685. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07514.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Pfreundschuh M, Schubert J, Ziepert M, Schmits R, Mohren M, Lengfelder E, Reiser M, Nickenig C, Clemens M, Peter N, Bokemeyer C, Eimermacher H, Ho A, Hoffmann M, Mertelsmann R, Trumper L, Balleisen L, Liersch R, Metzner B, Hartmann F, Glass B, Poeschel V, Schmitz N, Ruebe C, Feller AC, Loeffler M, German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL): Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9: 105-16. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70002-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Terada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement