- Open Access
Hypertension and hand-foot skin reactions related to VEGFR2 genotype and improved clinical outcome following bevacizumab and sorafenib
- Lokesh Jain†1, 2,
- Tristan M Sissung†1, 3,
- Romano Danesi4,
- Elise C Kohn3,
- William L Dahut3,
- Shivaani Kummar3,
- David Venzon5,
- David Liewehr5,
- Bevin C English6,
- Caitlin E Baum6,
- Robert Yarchoan7,
- Giuseppe Giaccone3,
- Jürgen Venitz2,
- Douglas K Price3, 6 and
- William D Figg1, 3, 6Email author
© Jain et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 10 May 2010
- Accepted: 14 July 2010
- Published: 14 July 2010
Hypertension (HT) and hand-foot skin reactions (HFSR) may be related to the activity of bevacizumab and sorafenib. We hypothesized that these toxicities would correspond to favorable outcome in these drugs, that HT and HFSR would coincide, and that VEGFR2 genotypic variation would be related to toxicity and clinical outcomes.
Toxicities (≥ grade 2 HT or HFSR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) following treatment initiation were evaluated. Toxicity incidence and VEGFR2 H472Q and V297I status were compared to clinical outcomes.
Individuals experiencing HT had longer PFS following bevacizumab therapy than those without this toxicity in trials utilizing bevacizumab in patients with prostate cancer (31.5 vs 14.9 months, n = 60, P = 0.0009), and bevacizumab and sorafenib in patients with solid tumors (11.9 vs. 3.7 months, n = 27, P = 0.052). HT was also linked to a > 5-fold OS benefit after sorafenib and bevacizumab cotherapy (5.7 versus 29.0 months, P = 0.0068). HFSR was a marker for prolonged PFS during sorafenib therapy (6.1 versus 3.7 months respectively, n = 113, P = 0.0003). HT was a risk factor for HFSR in patients treated with bevacizumab and/or sorafenib (OR(95%CI) = 3.2(1.5-6.8), P = 0.0024). Carriers of variant alleles at VEGFR2 H472Q experienced greater risk of developing HT (OR(95%CI) = 2.3(1.2 - 4.6), n = 170, P = 0.0154) and HFSR (OR(95%CI) = 2.7(1.3 - 5.6), n = 170, P = 0.0136).
This study suggests that HT and HFSR may be markers for favorable clinical outcome, HT development may be a marker for HFSR, and VEGFR2 alleles may be related to the development of toxicities during therapy with bevacizumab and/or sorafenib.
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
- Overall Survival
- Progression Free Survival
The process of angiogenesis is crucial for carcinogenesis, invasiveness and metastasis in several tumor types including prostate, ovary, kidney, non-small cell lung and colorectal cancer [1–3]. This process is governed by an array of growth factors; however, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its major receptor in the endothelium, VEGFR2, are predominant regulators of this process . Rising interest in angiogenic modulators has led to the design and synthesis of several new molecules that target the VEGF signaling pathway, such as sorafenib, bevacizumab and sunitinib, which are currently approved for various solid tumors. There is wide inter-individual variation in toxicity and clinical outcome following treatment with agents targeted at the VEGF pathway suggesting that predictive markers of these outcomes could be clinically useful.
Sorafenib and bevacizumab have some common toxicities, such as hypertension (HT), diarrhea, and gastrointestinal perforation [4, 5]. However, sorafenib confers frequent cutaneous side effects, including hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR; palmar-plantar dysesthesia; acral erythema) and rash in many individuals while bevacizumab confers HFSR in a limited number of individuals. Both in-vitro and in-vivo evidence support that HT, results directly from the pharmacologic activity of VEGF inhibitors . Recently, we demonstrated that sorafenib-induced HFSR was directly related to cumulative sorafenib dose, that HT and HFSR development coincided, and that HFSR is more prevalent in individuals being treated with a combination of sorafenib and bevacizumab targeting the VEGF receptor and the VEGF growth factor, respectively. A pharmacokinetic interaction was not observed . Taken together, these results suggest that HFSR and HT may both be related to the activity of anti-VEGF and anti-VEGFR therapy; thus, HT and HFSR may also be markers for a greater degree of response in patients treated with sorafenib and bevacizumab. Inter-individual genetic variation in the VEGF pathway may also alter both the toxicity and response to these agents.
The VEGFR2 gene contains two SNPs that are located in exons 7 and 11 and result in nonsynonymous amino acid changes at residues 297 Val>Ile and 472 His>Gln in the third and fifth immunoglobulin like (Ig-like) domains of VEGFR2 receptor, respectively. The Ig-like domain 3 is critical for binding to the VEGF ligand , while domains 4-7 contain structural features that inhibit VEGFR2 signaling in the absence of VEGF . HEK293 s cells that were transfected with VEGFR2 V297I SNP had significantly low VEGF binding efficiency regardless of VEGFR2 H472Q genotype, while variant VEGFR2 H472Q allele had minimal effect on VEGF binding efficiency .
We hypothesize that 1) the development of HT and HFSR following anti-VEGF therapy with bevacizumab and sorafenib is a marker for response to these drugs; 2) that since both toxicities are related to the activity of these agents, the development of a single toxicity (i.e. HT) would increase the risk of developing the other toxicity (i.e. HFSR); and 3) that functional SNPs in VEGFR2 could alter antiangiogenesis treatment response or outcome by affecting the VEGF signalling pathways. To this end, we determined if HT and HFSR were associated with progression free survival or overall survival, and if development of HT increased the risk of developing HFSR in patients with various solid tumors being treated with sorafenib and/or bevacizumab. We also determined if genetic polymorphisms in the VEGFR2 gene modified the relationship between toxicity and survival endpoints as well as the relationship between coincidence of HT and HFSR.
Patients and treatment
Summary of patients included in analysis
Frequency of Toxicity [n= (%)]
Median PFS (months)
HT ≥ grade 2
HFSR ≥ grade 2
HT < grade 2 vs. ≥ grade 2
Log-Rank P =
HFSR < grade 2 vs. ≥ grade 2
Log-Rank P =
Bevacizuamb + Thalidomide + Docetaxel
14.9 vs. 31.5
Sorafenib + Bevacizumab
3.7 vs. 11.9
3.7 vs. 12.6
3.7 vs. 1.8
2.0 vs. 3.1
1.9 vs. 4.6
2.9 vs. 3.7
Sorafenib + Cetuximab
4.7 vs. 8.7
Sorafenib +/- Protease inhibitor
The most severe grades of common, sorafenib treatment associated toxicities, namely rash, desquamation, diarrhea, HFSR, HT and fatigue were used for analysis. Toxicities were graded based on the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria version 3.0. This retrospective genotyping analysis was approved by the National Cancer Institute Institutional Review Board.
DNA was extracted from plasma or whole blood using QiaBlood extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Genotyping for two VEGFR2 loci was performed by single/nested PCR using the following primers at an annealing temperature of 60°C: rs1870377 (T/A) F1:5'-CAGAATCACCCTACACAGATGC-3', R1: 5'-TTCCCAGAATAGCTGCTTCC-3', F2: 5'-TGGTACTGCTAAAAGTCAATGG-3', R2:5'-GGCTGCGTTGGAAGTTATTT-3'; and rs2305948 (C/T) F4: 5'-GGTTTGAACCCAAGTTCCTG-3', R4: 5'-CACTTTCACCACGTGAGGTTT-3', F5: 5'-TGGCCTCCCTAACAAGAAAA-3', R5: 5'-TGGTGTCCCTGTTTTTAGCA-3'. The details of the genotyping procedure are described elsewhere . The sequencing PCR was carried out with Big Dye (v3.1, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using the following PCR primers: rs1870377 (T/A) F3: 5'-CCTGGAAGTCCTCCACACTT-3', R3: 5'-AACCAAAGTCTGAATCTTTTCCTT-3'; and rs2305948 (C/T) F6: 5'-CCCTGACAAATGTGCTGTTC-3', R6: 5'-TGCTGTGCTTTGGAAGTTCA-3'. The PCR products were then sequenced on an ABI Prism 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) as per the instructions from the manufacturer.
The progression free or overall survival based on genotype or toxicity groups (grade ≥ 2/grade < 2) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method  and compared by the exact log-rank test. Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested separately for different ethnic groups, using the Chi-squared test. The impact of genotypes on treatment-associated toxicities and the association between toxicities were assessed by Fisher's exact test. All statistical analyses were two-tailed at a pre-specified significance level of < 0.05. In view of the exploratory nature of analysis, P-values were not formally corrected for multiple testing. SAS for Windows version 9.1.3 was used for these statistical analyses.
Genotype and allele frequencies for SNP in VEGFR2 loci for patients treated with sorafenib and/or bevacizumab, with or without other agents
Genotype frequencies, N (%)
HT and HFSR as phenotypic markers for PFS and OS
As is indicated in Table 1, incidence of ≥ grade 2 HFSR was also associated with PFS in patients with colon cancer treated with sorafenib (P = 0.0065) with those patients having HFSR (n = 2) having a significantly longer response to sorafenib (8.7 months) than those without HFSR (4.7 months, n = 16). HFSR and PFS were either marginally not associated in patients on BAY-BEV (P = 0.094), or were not associated on BAY-NSCLC and BAY-CRPC (P ≥ 0.29). However, since each group treated with sorafenib had a similar trend (i.e. patients with HFSR always had a longer median PFS) with a small number of patients in each group (n ≤ 46), we pooled survival data obtained from the above trials to analyze the relationship between HFSR and PFS with greater statistical power. The pooled analysis significantly improved the relationship between PFS and HFSR with patients who developed HFSR following treatment with sorafenib, either as single agent or in combination with bevacizumab or cetuximab (n = 32), having a median PFS of 6.1 months compared with 3.6 months in patients without these toxicities (n = 81; P = 0.0003, Figure 1C). However, this pooled analysis should be interpreted with caution given that it is present only when heterogeneous groups of data obtained from patients are combined together. Association of these toxicities with OS was not significant with a single striking exception where those patients receiving the BAY-BEV combination had a significantly longer survival (P = 0.0093) if they developed hypertension during therapy (29 months, n = 14) when compared to those that did not develop hypertension (5.7 months, n = 12; Figure 1D). No other toxicity (i.e., rash/desquamation, diarrhea, or fatigue) was related to PFS (P > 0.05) for either drug.
Increased risk of developing HFSR along with HT
We next hypothesized that since HT and HFSR originate from the activity of bevacizumab and sorafenib, the development of a single toxicity (i.e. HT) would increase the risk of developing the other (i.e. HFSR). Analysis of association between toxicities revealed that individuals with HT grades < 2 had a lower risk of developing HFSR grades ≥ 2 (19 of 126 patients, 15.1%) than those patients with HT grades ≥ 2 (19 of 52 patients, 36.5%, OR (95%CI) = 3.2 (1.5-6.8), P = 0.0024). Therefore, increased HT grade conferred a significantly increased risk of also developing HFSR.
VEGFR2 H472Q and V297I genotypes vs. treatment associated toxicities and survival following sorafenib and/or bevacizumab therapy
Comparison of toxicities between wild type and variant allele groups for VEGFR2 SNPs
Toxicity grade ≥2
To determine whether the aforementioned association between HT and HFSR is confounded by VEGFR2 H472Q, the association between any two of the factors (i.e., HT, HFSR and VEGFR2 H472Q) with stratification by the remaining factor were tested. The results were consistent with the hypothesis that the associations are independent of each other. Genotype-toxicity relationships for other toxicities and studied VEGFR2 SNPs were not significant (Table 3). The VEGFR2 V297I SNP was not related to toxicity, and neither VEGFR2 genotype was related to any survival endpoint in any of the individual clinical trials in spite of the relationship with toxicity.
We hypothesized that 1) increased HT and HFSR were markers for increased response duration in individuals treated with bevacizumab and/or sorafenib; 2) that since these toxicities are likely derived from the activity of bevacizumab and sorafenib, the development of HT would increase the risk of also developing HFSR; and 3) that VEGFR2 genotypic variation may be responsible for alterations in the activity of bevacizumab and/or sorafenib therapy that would manifest in associations with toxicity or clinical outcome following treatment with these agents. The results of the present study confirm a previously published study where HFSR development was noted to be related to PFS in patients with various solid tumors receiving doses of sorafenib between 300-600 mg bid , and a small study that HT is related to bevacizumab response . Moreover, those receiving combination therapy with bevacizumab and sorafenib that developed hypertension enjoyed a greater than 5-fold increase in overall survival following therapy initiation. Consistent with our previous results , the development of HT was also directly related to the incidence of HFSR, further suggesting that these two toxicities are markers for the activity of anti-VEGF therapy. This study is the first to evaluate VEGFR2 H472Q status; carriers of 472Q alleles were more likely to experience HT and HFSR, although the relationship between genotype and toxicity was independent of the relationship between the two types of toxicity, and was not related to any of the studied survival endpoints.
The physiological basis for bevacizumab- and sorafenib-induced HT and HFSR is currently unknown although they most likely originate from the activity of these drugs altering signaling through several targets (i.e., VEGF, Raf-1, wild-type B-Raf, mutant b-raf V599E, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, PDGFR-β, Flt3, c-KIT and p38) [19, 20]; recent data suggests that the VEGF pathway directly contributes [6, 7]. Once these pathways are altered, HT may develop because of decrease in vascular surface area , and HFSR may develop due to inefficiency of the repair of microtrauma originating from use of the hands and feet . In spite of the unknown origin of these toxicities, our data are consistent with the hypothesis that HT and HFSR are related to the activity of these drugs. The data also suggest that these toxicities are markers for prolonged response, and in the case of sorafenib and bevacizumab coadministration, prolonged survival benefit from these therapies. Others have also observed that the severity of rash in patients with NSCLC is directly related to EGF-RTK inhibition by tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and that this cutaneous toxicity is also a marker for increased survival [17, 22]. Moreover, it has also been suggested that rash brought on by EGF-pathway inhibitors could be useful for optimal dose titration . Therefore, future studies directly evaluating the development of HT and HFSR as markers for effective dosing of these bevacizumab and sorafenib are warranted in order to decrease the incidence of toxicity and improve response.
Interestingly, VEGFR2 genotype may also be related to the incidence of both HT and HFSR independently, but does not confound the relationship between the two toxicities. These data suggest that the development of these toxicities is related to signaling through the VEGF pathway, at least in part, although the polymorphism in VEGFR2 is not the sole factor responsible for the relationship between HT and HFSR. Given the heterogeneity of the clinical trials under study, the lack of a relationship between VEGFR2 genotype and PFS may be due to low statistical power and it is hoped that future studies in homogeneous populations will validate the relationship between VEGFR2 polymorphism and survival.
The present analysis is inconsistent with a previous report where it was determined that patients with breast cancer reported significantly longer OS for patients who developed HT on bevacizumab and paclitaxel combination than patients without this toxicity . The present data were obtained retrospectively from clinical studies that were not designed to retain patients on the basis that toxicity was a marker for efficacy. Indeed, a greater proportion of patients carrying the 472H/Q substitutions were removed from the trials due to toxicity (14%) than those carrying wild-type or variant genotypes (9%), although this was not statistically significant (data not shown). This is not surprising given the association of VEGFR2 variants and toxicity. However, since those carrying this genotype also had a better response in general, it is possible that the desirable long-term benefit of the treatment may not have been enjoyed in patients being removed from therapy prior to tumor progression due to toxicity.
In conclusion, our data indicate that HT and HFSR are markers for prolonged progression free survival in patients treated with bevacizumab and/or sorafenib, patients receiving a combination of both agents that develop HT have a large increase in treatment-related survival, and that the development of HT on these agents increases the risk of also developing HFSR. The association with toxicity was not significant with respect to overall survival. When VEGFR2 genotypes were considered, the present data suggest that those carrying 472Q alleles at H472Q are at an increased risk of developing both HT and HFSR following bevacizumab, although the SNP is not related to either progression free survival or overall survival. Given the exploratory pilot nature of this study, it is hoped that future studies will validate these results and provide a mechanism by which toxicity is related to PFS and VEGFR2 genotypic variation is related to toxicity.
This study was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. We thank our data managers Cynthia Graves, Sonja Crandon, Qinghua Ge (Roger), Shveta Tiwari, and Kathleen Wyvill, and most of all, our patients who participated in these trials. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organization imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
- Gomez-Raposo C, Mendiola M, Barriuso J, Casado E, Hardisson D, Redondo A: Angiogenesis and ovarian cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2009, 11: 564-571. 10.1007/s12094-009-0406-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Griffioen AW, Molema G: Angiogenesis: potentials for pharmacologic intervention in the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic inflammation. Pharmacol Rev. 2000, 52: 237-268.Google Scholar
- Rini BI: Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2009, 115: 2306-2312. 10.1002/cncr.24227.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gressett SM, Shah SR: Intricacies of bevacizumab-induced toxicities and their management. Ann Pharmacother. 2009, 43: 490-501. 10.1345/aph.1L426.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Porta C, Paglino C, Imarisio I, Bonomi L: Uncovering Pandora's vase: the growing problem of new toxicities from novel anticancer agents. The case of sorafenib and sunitinib. Clin Exp Med. 2007, 7: 127-134. 10.1007/s10238-007-0145-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Launay-Vacher V, Deray G: Hypertension and proteinuria: a class-effect of antiangiogenic therapies. Anticancer Drugs. 2009, 20: 81-82. 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283161012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Azad NS, Aragon-Ching JB, Dahut WL, Gutierrez M, Figg WD, Jain L, Steinberg SM, Turner ML, Kohn EC, Kong HH: Hand-foot skin reaction increases with cumulative sorafenib dose and with combination anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 1411-1416. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1141.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fuh G, Li B, Crowley C, Cunningham B, Wells JA: Requirements for binding and signaling of the kinase domain receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 11197-11204. 10.1074/jbc.273.18.11197.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tao Q, Backer MV, Backer JM, Terman BI: Kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) extracellular immunoglobulin-like domains 4-7 contain structural features that block receptor dimerization and vascular endothelial growth factor-induced signaling. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 21916-21923. 10.1074/jbc.M100763200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Zheng Y, Zhang W, Yu H, Lou K, Zhang Y, Qin Q, Zhao B, Yang Y, Hui R: Polymorphisms of KDR gene are associated with coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 50: 760-767. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.074.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aragon-Ching JB, Jain L, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, Wright JJ, Steinberg SM, Draper D, Venitz J, Jones E, Chen CC: Final analysis of a phase II trial using sorafenib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2009, 103: 1636-1640. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08327.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- YM Ning JG, Arlen P, Latham L, Retter A, Wright J, Parnes H, Pinto P, Figg WD, Dahut WL: Phase II trial of thalidomide, bevacizumab, and docetaxel in patients (pts) with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). 2007Google Scholar
- M Gutierrez SK, Allen D, Turkbey B, Choyke P, Wright JJ, Kurkjian C, Giaccone G, Doroshow JH, Murgo AJ: A phase II study of multikinase inhibitor sorafenib in patients with relapsed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). 2008Google Scholar
- Azad NS, Posadas EM, Kwitkowski VE, Steinberg SM, Jain L, Annunziata CM, Minasian L, Sarosy G, Kotz HL, Premkumar A: Combination targeted therapy with sorafenib and bevacizumab results in enhanced toxicity and antitumor activity. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: 3709-3714. 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8332.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sissung TM, Baum CE, Deeken J, Price DK, Aragon-Ching J, Steinberg SM, Dahut W, Sparreboom A, Figg WD: ABCB1 genetic variation influences the toxicity and clinical outcome of patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer treated with docetaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 4543-4549. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4230.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kalbfleisch J, Prentice R: The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. 1980, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2Google Scholar
- Strumberg D, Awada A, Hirte H, Clark JW, Seeber S, Piccart P, Hofstra E, Voliotis D, Christensen O, Brueckner A, Schwartz B: Pooled safety analysis of BAY 43-9006 (sorafenib) monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours: Is rash associated with treatment outcome?. Eur J Cancer. 2006, 42: 548-556. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scartozzi M, Galizia E, Chiorrini S, Giampieri R, Berardi R, Pierantoni C, Cascinu S: Arterial hypertension correlates with clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line bevacizumab. Ann Oncol. 2009, 20: 227-230. 10.1093/annonc/mdn637.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lyons JF, Wilhelm S, Hibner B, Bollag G: Discovery of a novel Raf kinase inhibitor. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2001, 8: 219-225. 10.1677/erc.0.0080219.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilhelm SM, Carter C, Tang L, Wilkie D, McNabola A, Rong H, Chen C, Zhang X, Vincent P, McHugh M: BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 7099-7109. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1443.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Segaert S, Chiritescu G, Lemmens L, Dumon K, Van Cutsem E, Tejpar S: Skin toxicities of targeted therapies. Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45 (Suppl 1): 295-308. 10.1016/S0959-8049(09)70044-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Susman E: Rash correlates with tumour response after cetuximab. Lancet Oncol. 2004, 5: 647-10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01627-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schneider BP, Wang M, Radovich M, Sledge GW, Badve S, Thor A, Flockhart DA, Hancock B, Davidson N, Gralow J: Association of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 genetic polymorphisms with outcome in a trial of paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in advanced breast cancer: ECOG 2100. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: 4672-4678. 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.1612.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.