Open Access

Determination of SGK1 mRNA in non-small cell lung cancer samples underlines high expression in squamous cell carcinomas

  • Claudia Abbruzzese1,
  • Stefano Mattarocci1,
  • Laura Pizzuti2,
  • Anna M Mileo1,
  • Paolo Visca3,
  • Barbara Antoniani3,
  • Gabriele Alessandrini4,
  • Francesco Facciolo4,
  • Rosario Amato5,
  • Lucia D'Antona5,
  • Massimo Rinaldi2,
  • Armando Felsani6,
  • Nicola Perrotti5 and
  • Marco G Paggi1Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201231:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-31-4

Received: 7 November 2011

Accepted: 12 January 2012

Published: 12 January 2012

Abstract

Background

Lung cancer represents the most frequent cause of death for cancer. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for the vast majority of this disease, only early detection and treatment, when possible, may significantly affect patient's prognosis. An important role in NSCLC malignancy is attributed to the signal transduction pathways involving PI3Kinase, with consequent activation of the AKT family factors. The serum and glucocorticoid kinase (SGK) factors, which share high structural and functional homologies with the AKT factors, are a family of ubiquitously expressed serine/threonine kinases under the control of cellular stress and hormones. SGK1 is the most represented SGK member.

Methods

By means of immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time PCR, we determined SGK1 protein and mRNA expression in a cohort of 66 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NSCLC surgical samples. All samples belonged to patients with a well-documented clinical history.

Results

mRNA expression was significantly higher in squamous cell carcinomas, and correlated with several clinical prognostic indicators, being elevated in high-grade tumors and in tumors with bigger size and worse clinical stage. No correlation was found between SGK1 protein expression and these clinical parameters.

Conclusions

This explorative analysis of SGK1 expression in NSCLC samples highlights the potential role of this factor in NSCLC patients' prognosis. Moreover, the higher expression in the squamous cell carcinoma subtype opens new therapeutic possibilities in this NSCLC subtype by designing specific kinase inhibitors.

Keywords

SGK1 NSCLC mRNA quantitative PCR archival samples retrospective analysis

Background

Lung cancer represents the foremost cause of cancer death, at least in Western countries [13]. From a clinical point of view, lung cancer is classified as "small cell lung cancer" (SCLC) and "non-small cell lung cancer" (NSCLC), the form by far most frequent (about 85% of the total cases). NSCLCs are histopathologically subdivided into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma [1]. Recently, this NSCLC subclassification has been shown to reflect also specific epidemiological as well as biological behaviors, which can be epitomized in a higher incidence in never-smokers and in women of the adenocarcinomatous subtype [47] and in its higher sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors [8].

In NSCLC, a major role is attributed to the membrane-bound tyrosine kinase receptors, mainly EGFR, which in their active, phosphorylated form generate a cascade of biological effects which strongly favor several biological processes, as cell proliferation, neo-angiogenesis and invasive capability [9]. Interestingly, also insulin and insulin receptor have been recently involved in lung epithelial cells transformation [10, 11]. A pivotal step of the cascade triggered by tyrosine kinase receptors is the activation of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3Kinase) pathway, which allows the convergence of several signals in activating the AKT family of serine/threonine kinases, thus stimulating cell growth, mitosis, survival and energy metabolism [1214]. The serum and glucocorticoid kinase (SGK) family of serine/threonine kinases share many structural and functional similarities with the AKT family, since the metabolic pathways over which both families exert their activity are extremely similar [15]. SGK family is composed of three members, SGK1, SGK2 and SGK3, coded by three different genes, which are in turn subdivided into different splicing variants [16]. SGK1, the most represented member of the SGK family, is ubiquitously expressed and is under the control of cellular stress (including cell shrinkage) and hormones (including gluco-and mineral-corticoids). All isoforms are activated by insulin and other growth factors [15].

SGKs are involved in numerous pathophysiological functions, and, among these, also neoplastic growth, where SGK factors show often enhanced activity, influencing several control mechanisms as cell growth and proliferation [15], cell survival [17, 18], cell migration and invasion [19, 20].

Recently, our group described the role of insulin and insulin receptor in the early carcinogenic steps of some NSCLCs [11]. Here we used quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to determine respectively mRNA and protein expression of SGK1 (total and phosphorylated/activated), the most represented family member, in archival NSCLC samples from patients with a well-documented clinical history. This is a retrospective study aiming at characterizing the role of SGK1 in NSCLC onset and progression, and in setting the ground for the possible use of SGK1 as a prognostic factor or therapeutic target.

Methods

Patients

Tissues from 66 NSCLC surgical specimens (35 adenocarcinomas, 25 squamous cell carcinomas, plus 6 specimens classified as "other", which are 1 adenosquamous carcinoma, 4 undifferentiated carcinomas and 1 large cell carcinoma) were evaluated. All the patients were diagnosed and treated at the Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. Patients underwent international standard radio- and/or chemotherapeutic protocols. Clinical data (patient history, diagnosis, staging and survival) were obtained from the National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena" databases. Survival data were integrated by periodic interviews with patients and/or their relatives. Samples were collected according to institutional ethical guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

RNA extraction and Quantitative gene expression analysis in NSCLC archival samples

Total RNA extraction from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) NSCLC specimens was done essentially according to the method described in previous papers [21, 22], using modifications concerning slice thickness (7.5 μm instead of 10 μm) and optimizing the time for proteinase digestion (5 h). Total RNA extracted was examined and quantified using the 2100 bioanalizer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). For qPCR reaction, the 7900 HT thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Branchburg, NJ) apparatus was employed, as described previously [11], using the sequence specific primer pairs described in Table 1 [specific for SGK1 (all four isoforms), for each of the four isoforms and for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), a qualitative and quantitative transcripts control].
Table 1

Sequences of the primers used for qPCR of transcripts coding for SGK1 (all four isoforms), for each of the four isoforms and for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).

Gene Symbol

Accession Number

Sense Primer

Antisense Primer

SGK1 (all 4 isoforms)

N/A

AGGGCAGTTTTGGAAAGGTT

CTGTAAAACTTTGACTGCATAGAACA

SGK1 (isoform 1)

NM_005627.3

GGCACCCTCACTTACTCCAG

GGCAATCTTCTGAATAAAGTCGTT

SGK1 (isoform 2)

NM_001143676.1

CGGTGGAAAATGGTAAACAAA

CTTGATCCACCTTCGTACCC

SGK1 (isoform 3)

NM_001143677.1

GAAGCTATAAAACCCCCTTTGAA

GGCAATCTTCTGAATAAAGTCGTT

SGK1 (isoform 4)

NM_001143678.1

CTTCCTGCTGAGCGGACT

GGCAATCTTCTGAATAAAGTCGTT

GAPDH

NM_002046

AGCCACATCGCTCAGACA

GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC

Histological examination and IHC

The histological diagnosis was re-evaluated in 2 μm FFPE sections after routine laboratory haematoxylin/eosin staining.

IHC analysis was done as described [11], omitting the antigen retrieval step, and using a primary monoclonal antibody for SGK1 (sc-28338, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Santa Cruz, CA), applied overnight (O.N.) at 4°C at a dilution of 1:300. Phospho-SGK1 (pSGK1 Ser422) was detected by means of a rabbit polyclonal antibody (sc-16745, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) applied for 2 h at 4°C at a dilution of 1:100). For both antibodies, optimal working dilution was defined on the basis of titration experiments. The secondary antibody solution and streptavidin-biotin, both contained in the QP900-9L kit (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA.), were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. Finally, 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazide (AEC substrate kit, ScyTek, Logan, UT) was used as chromogen. Mayer's haematoxylin was used for the nuclear counterstaining. Negative controls for each tissue section were prepared by omitting the primary antibody.

Scoring and quantification of mRNA expression and immunoreactivity

mRNA expression

Progression of the qPCR reaction, performed using the primer pairs specified in Table 1, was monitored. All the experiments were performed in quadruplicate.

Immunoreactivity

Two examiners (P.V. and M.G.P.) evaluated independently the staining pattern of SGK1 and phospho-SGK1, with subsequent discussion for the cases in which divergent diagnoses were given. According to the amount of staining, cases were classified in tertiles as follows: a) negative/low; b) medium; c) high.

Statistical analysis

For quantitative variables, average values were determined, and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test was applied to evaluate statistical significance. All categorical variables were tested for statistical significance by using Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were done using the Kaplan-Meier method; the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to compare survival times between patient groups.

For all statistical tests, a two-tailed P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

SGK1 and phospho-SGK1 protein detection in NSCLC samples

SGK1 and phospho-SGK1 protein detection was done by IHC on tissue sections from 66 NSCLC specimens from patients with a well-documented clinical history. The antibodies employed did not allow discriminating among the SGK1 forms deriving from the four splicing variants. Samples stained for SGK1 displayed a granular cytoplasmic staining, considered specific due to its absence in the negative controls. Staining appeared non-homogeneous, with an intensity which was variable in different areas of the sample. Samples stained for phospho-SGK1 displayed a granular cytoplasmic staining as well, with a range of intensity comparable to that of SGK1. Figure 1 shows examples of negative and high SGK1 and phospho-SGK1 staining in NSCLC samples. According to staining intensity, samples were subdivided into tertiles, consistent with the scoring given by two pathologists, with null/low, medium and high SGK1 expression. Statistical evaluation found no correlation between SGK1 or phospho-SGK1 staining and the following clinical parameters: a) age at diagnosis; b) gender; c) smoking habit; d) histolopathogical subtype; e) histopathological grade; f) tumor size; g) lymph node stage; h) clinical tumor stage.
Figure 1

Immunohistochemical staining for SGK1 and phospho-SGK1. Representative samples showing negative and high SGK1 staining (sum of all variants) and negative and high phospho-SGK1 in NSCLC. Original magnification = x20.

SGK1 mRNA detection in NSCLC samples

By means of the specific primers illustrated in Table 1, we determined the mRNA amount of SGK1 either as the sum of the four different splicing variants or as the value specific for each single variant. In all cases, GAPDH mRNA expression was used for an internal check of the quality of the FFPE-extracted RNA and for normalization. Total SGK1 mRNA expression data, and the values for each splicing variant, were subdivided in tertiles of 22 patients each. Data were challenged against the clinical parameters described above. As far as it concerns the evaluation of the expression of the sum of the four SGK1 mRNA, statistically significant correlation was found with:

a) histolopathogical subtype (P = 0.022), with the highest expression in squamous cell carcinomas;

b) histopathological grade (P = 0.026), with the lowest expression in low-grade tumors (G1) and the highest expression in high-grade tumors (G3);

c) tumor size (P = 0.013), with lower expression in T1 and higher in T3-T4 tumors.

d) tumor stage (P = 0.028), where the highest expression was found in patients with worse clinical stage.

In this experimental set, no statistical significance was found between SGK1 total mRNA expression and patient's gender, age, smoking history and lymph node stage. All these data are summarized in Table 2. In addition, no correlation between SGK1 mRNA quantification by qPCR and SGK1 protein (or phosphoprotein) expression by IHC was found.
Table 2

Evaluation of SGK1 (all variants) mRNA expression in NSCLC samples by qPCR: correlation with clinico-pathological parameters.

  

Null/low SGK1 expression

n = 22

Medium SGK1 expression

n = 22

High SGK1 expression

n = 22

P-value

   Patient age (years) §

69.1 ± 1.6

66.3 ± 2.4

65.2 ± 1.8

0.386 (NS)

Gender

Male

11

13

15

0.471 (NS)

 

Female

11

9

7

 

Smoking habit

Smokers

10

12

11

0.834 (NS)

 

Non-smokers

12

10

11

 

Histopathological Subtype

Adenocarcinoma

15

12

8

0.022

 

Squamous cell carcinoma

3

10

12

 
 

Other

4

0

2

 

Histopathological Grade

G1

5

0

1

0.026

 

G2

8

15

9

 
 

G3

9

7

12

 

Tumor Size

T 1

9

2

6

0.013

 

T 2

12

15

10

 
 

T 3

1

2

6

 
 

T 4

0

3

0

 

Lymph Node Stage

N 0

18

14

16

0.315 (NS)

 

N 1

0

4

2

 
 

N 2

3

3

4

 
 

N/A

1

1

0

 

Tumor Stage

Stage I a

10

2

5

0.028

 

Stage I b

7

10

6

 
 

Stage II a

1

0

0

 
 

Stage II b

1

2

6

 
 

Stage III a

3

4

5

 
 

Stage III b

0

3

0

 

§ Average values; in bold and underlined = statistically significant results; N.S. = non-significant.

When mRNA expression of each single SGK1 splicing variant was considered, lower levels of statistical significance were achieved, as reported below:

1. SGK1 variant 1: significant correlation with histolopathogical subtype (P = 0.017), with the highest expression in squamous cell carcinomas; significant correlation with the expression of the sum of the four SGK1 splicing variants (P = 4.7 × 10-6). Such a high significance was due to the fact that this SGK1 form was by far the most abundant splicing variant;

2. SGK1 variant 2: significant correlation with histolopathogical subtype (p = 0.022), with the highest expression in squamous cell carcinomas; significant correlation with the expression of the sum of the four SGK1 splicing variants (P = 0.001);

3. SGK1 variant 3: significant correlation only with the expression of the sum of the four SGK1 splicing variants (P = 0.003);

4. SGK1 variant 4: significant correlation only with the expression of the sum of the four SGK1 splicing variants (P = 0.008);

When survival data were analyzed (overall survival and disease-free survival), Kaplan-Meier analysis did not reach statistical significance in any cases. The best fitting concerned the expression of SGK1 variant 3 and disease-free survival (P = 0.083, non-significant), when only the highest and lowest tertiles were taken into consideration (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Disease-Free survival of NSCLC patients with high or low SGK1 variant 3 mRNA expression. Kaplan-Meier plot representing the disease-free survival of NSCLC patients belonging to the high or low tertile for SGK1 variant 3 mRNA expression. In spite of a discernible trend of better survival for NSCLC patients belonging to the low tertile for SGK1 variant 3 mRNA expression, when compared to the high tertile, with a median value of 37 and 22 mo., respectively, these data are statistically non-significant (P-values = 0.083).

Discussion

The discovery and development of novel predictive tumor biomarkers is a complicated process, and currently the best choice for the identification of reliable markers appears to be an intelligent compromise between the results obtained from high-throughput technologies and the so-called "hypothesis-driven" analyses, which are based upon preliminary selections of factors whose expression is to be estimated (biased approach) [23, 24].

Following our previous results on insulin and activated insulin receptor in NSCLC [11], we analyzed in this work the role of SGK1 in NSCLCs by evaluating protein, phosphoprotein and mRNA expression in 66 NSCLC FFPE surgical samples. The data of SGK1 expression showing the best statistical fitting with patients' clinical parameters spring from the mRNA analysis rather than IHC determinations. The most interesting data belong to the set concerning the determination of the mRNA expression of the sum of the four SGK1 splicing variants. Each single splicing variant, when analyzed alone, generated less statistically significant data. From these results, we can assume that the biological role of these different splicing variants goes largely in the same direction, at least in this experimental setting. Essentially, our results showed higher SGK1 transcription in tissue samples from patients with worse clinical prognostic indicators, as, for example, histopathological grading. Among all NSCLC cases, the squamous cell subtype exhibited the highest SGK1 mRNA expression.

Considering SGK1 a factor strongly related to cellular stress, it is not surprising that the highest expression was found in high-grade tumors, because these are usually characterized by higher rates of energy metabolism, which expose them to relative hypo-oxygenation and, paradoxically, to higher oxidative stress due to the Warburg effect [2528].

A direct correlation between SGK1 protein determination by IHC and tumor malignancy was not found. A possible explanation comes from the notion that the half-life of the four SGK1 protein variants is quite different, being essentially related to the presence or absence of the "ER-motif" in the N-terminal region of the protein, a 6-amino acid sequence responsible for the binding to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The ER-motif, when present, imposes a selective localization of the SGK1 molecule on the ER, thus inducing its rapid degradation via the ubiquitin pathway. For this reason, SGK1 variants which possess the ER motif have a half-life by far shorter than the other variants. Indeed, biological activity of SGK1 variants provided of ER motif is mainly regulated via a synthesis/degradation equilibrium [29], while, for the other variants, regulation is mainly due to post-translational modifications (phosphorylation/dephosphorylation) [15].

In this context, it is worth of note that the identification of high SGK1 mRNA expression mainly in the squamous cell subtype of NSCLC may pave the way for specific targeted therapies in this NSCLC subtype. Indeed, currently squamous cell carcinoma appears neglected as far as targeted molecular therapies are considered, being most of these selective molecules employed essentially for the adenocarcinoma subtype. If the role of SGK1 as a specific molecular marker for squamous cell carcinoma will be further validated, an inhibitor of SGK1 kinase activity would be highly appreciated in this NSCLC specific phenotype. Indeed, inhibitors of the AKT family of serine/threonine kinases, structurally and functionally closely related to the SGK factors, have been already described, and their use in clinical trials is underway [3032].

It seems clear, however, that our knowledge on the role of the SGK family factors in neoplastic diseases is at a very early stage and that further studies are therefore necessary to indicate the most appropriate use of the determination of these kinases in prognostic/predictive evaluation of NSCLC patients as well as the possibility to consider them as a druggable target for specific small molecule inhibitors.

Conclusions

This work is an explorative study on the role of SGK1, the most represented member of the SGK family of serine/threonine kinases, in NSCLC. The notions derived from our cohort of patients confirm the "oncogenic" role of SGK1, where higher mRNA expression appears related to patients with worse prognostic indicators. Moreover, the significantly higher SGK1 expression in the squamous cell subtype of NSCLC could indicate this factor as central in establishing prognostic/predictive parameters as well as in enforcing the design of SGK serine/threonine kinase inhibitors to be employed in the management of patients with squamous cell lung cancer.

Notes

List of abbreviations

NSCLC: 

non-small cell lung cancer

SGK1: 

serum and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1

FFPE: 

formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded

GAPDH: 

glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

qPCR: 

quantitative real-time PCR

IHC: 

immunohistochemistry

ER: 

endoplasmic reticulum.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Irene Terrenato for her help in statistical analysis.

This work was supported by grants from Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), Ministero della Salute and Human Health Foundation (HHF) to M.G.P.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Development of Therapeutic Programs, National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", IRCCS
(2)
Medical Oncology Division B, National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena"
(3)
Department of Pathology, Regina Elena Cancer Institute
(4)
Department of Oncologic Thoracic Surgery, Regina Elena Cancer Institute
(5)
Department of Experimental and clinical Medicine "G. Salvatore", Faculty of Medicine, University Magna Graecia
(6)
CNR, Istituto di Neurobiologia e Medicina Molecolare

References

  1. Herbst RS, Heymach JV, Lippman SM: Lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 1367-1380. 10.1056/NEJMra0802714.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009, 59: 225-249. 10.3322/caac.20006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boffetta P: Epidemiology of environmental and occupational cancer. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 6392-6403. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207715.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Patel JD: Lung cancer in women. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 3212-3218. 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Subramanian J, Govindan R: Lung cancer in never smokers: a review. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 561-570. 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Samet JM, Avila-Tang E, Boffetta P, Hannan LM, Olivo-Marston S, Thun MJ: Lung cancer in never smokers: clinical epidemiology and environmental risk factors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 5626-5645. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0376.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Paggi MG, Vona R, Abbruzzese C, Malorni W: Gender-related disparities in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 2010, 298: 1-8. 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.08.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Miller VA, Kris MG, Shah N, Patel J, Azzoli C, Gomez J: Bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype and smoking history predict sensitivity to gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22: 1103-1109. 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.158.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Schlessinger J: Ligand-induced, receptor-mediated dimerization and activation of EGF receptor. Cell. 2002, 110: 669-672. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00966-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pollak M: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8: 915-928. 10.1038/nrc2536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mattarocci S, Abbruzzese C, Mileo AM, Visca P, Antoniani B, Alessandrini G: Intracellular presence of insulin and its phosphorylated receptor in non-small cell lung cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2009, 221: 766-770. 10.1002/jcp.21916.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bellacosa A, Kumar CC, Di Cristofano A, Testa JR: Activation of AKT kinases in cancer: implications for therapeutic targeting. Adv Cancer Res. 2005, 94: 29-86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ruggero D, Sonenberg N: The Akt of translational control. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 7426-7434. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209098.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Testa JR, Tsichlis PN: AKT signaling in normal and malignant cells. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 7391-7393. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruhn MA, Pearson RB, Hannan RD, Sheppard KE: Second AKT: the rise of SGK in cancer signalling. Growth Factors. 2010, 28: 394-408. 10.3109/08977194.2010.518616.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lang F, Bohmer C, Palmada M, Seebohm G, Strutz-Seebohm N, Vallon V: (Patho)physiological significance of the serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase isoforms. Physiol Rev. 2006, 86: 1151-1178. 10.1152/physrev.00050.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu D, Yang X, Songyang Z: Identification of CISK, a new member of the SGK kinase family that promotes IL-3-dependent survival. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: 1233-1236. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00733-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mikosz CA, Brickley DR, Sharkey MS, Moran TW, Conzen SD: Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated protection from apoptosis is associated with induction of the serine/threonine survival kinase gene, sgk-1. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 16649-16654. 10.1074/jbc.M010842200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tangir J, Bonafe N, Gilmore-Hebert M, Henegariu O, Chambers SK: SGK1, a potential regulator of c-fms related breast cancer aggressiveness. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2004, 21: 477-483. 10.1007/s10585-004-4226-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Failor KL, Desyatnikov Y, Finger LA, Firestone GL: Glucocorticoid-induced degradation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 protein is triggered by serum- and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase and Akt signaling and controls beta-catenin dynamics and tight junction formation in mammary epithelial tumor cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2007, 21: 2403-2415. 10.1210/me.2007-0143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cronin M, Pho M, Dutta D, Stephans JC, Shak S, Kiefer MC: Measurement of gene expression in archival paraffin-embedded tissues: development and performance of a 92-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay. Am J Pathol. 2004, 164: 35-42. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63093-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Antonov J, Goldstein DR, Oberli A, Baltzer A, Pirotta M, Fleischmann A: Reliable gene expression measurements from degraded RNA by quantitative real-time PCR depend on short amplicons and a proper normalization. Lab Invest. 2005, 85: 1040-1050. 10.1038/labinvest.3700303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bianchi F, Nicassio F, Di Fiore PP: Unbiased vs. biased approaches to the identification of cancer signatures: the case of lung cancer. Cell Cycle. 2008, 7: 729-734. 10.4161/cc.7.6.5591.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Guan P, Huang D, He M, Zhou B: Lung cancer gene expression database analysis incorporating prior knowledge with support vector machine-based classification method. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 28: 103-10.1186/1756-9966-28-103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakashima RA, Paggi MG, Pedersen PL: Contributions of glycolysis and oxydative phosphorylation to adenosine-5'-triphosphate production in AS-30D hepatoma cells. Cancer Res. 1984, 44: 5702-5706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakashima RA, Paggi MG, Arora KK, Pedersen PL: Integration of mitochondrial function with high aerobic glycolysis in tumors: role of hexokinase binding to the outer mitochondrial membrane. Integration of Mitochondrial Function. Edited by: Lemasters JJ, Hackenbrock CR, Thurman RG, Westhoff HV. 1990, New York, N.Y.: Plenum Publishing Company, 405-411.Google Scholar
  27. Wallace DC: Mitochondria and cancer: Warburg addressed. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2005, 70: 363-374. 10.1101/sqb.2005.70.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pedersen PL: Warburg, me and Hexokinase 2: Multiple discoveries of key molecular events underlying one of cancers' most common phenotypes, the "Warburg Effect", i.e., elevated glycolysis in the presence of oxygen. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2007, 39: 211-222. 10.1007/s10863-007-9094-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Brickley DR, Mikosz CA, Hagan CR, Conzen SD: Ubiquitin modification of serum and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase-1 (SGK-1). J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 43064-43070. 10.1074/jbc.M207604200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mattmann ME, Stoops SL, Lindsley CW: Inhibition of Akt with small molecules and biologics: historical perspective and current status of the patent landscape. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2011, 21: 1309-1338. 10.1517/13543776.2011.587959.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Morrow JK, Du-Cuny L, Chen L, Meuillet EJ, Mash EA, Powis G: Recent development of anticancer therapeutics targeting Akt. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2011, 6: 146-159. 10.2174/157489211793980079.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hixon ML, Paccagnella L, Millham R, Perez-Olle R, Gualberto A: Development of inhibitors of the IGF-IR/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2010, 5: 189-208. 10.2174/157488710792007329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Abbruzzese et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement