- Open Access
LncRNA CARMN overexpression promotes prognosis and chemosensitivity of triple negative breast cancer via acting as miR143-3p host gene and inhibiting DNA replication
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research volume 40, Article number: 205 (2021)
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with poor prognosis and lack of effective treatment target. Here we screened differentially expressed lncRNAs through bioinformatics analysis and identified CARMN as a downregulated lncRNA which is lowest expressed in TNBC. We aimed to identify the potential role and molecular mechanisms of CARMN in TNBC.
Predictive value of CARMN was explored in breast cancer cohorts. TNBC cell lines with CARMN overexpression or CARMN silence and were used for in vitro and in vivo experiments. RNA-seq of CARMN overexpressed cells was performed for exploring downstream of CARMN.
CARMN is downregulated at different phase of malignant transformation of breast tissue. CARMN can predict both better prognosis and higher response rate of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. A nomogram is built to predict cisplatin-based chemotherapy response in breast cancer. Through in vitro and in vivo studies, we confirmed CARMN can also inhibit tumorigenesis and enhance sensitivity to cisplatin in TNBC cells. RNA-seq and further experiments revealed CARMN can inhibit DNA replication. MCM5, an important DNA replication initiation factor, is the most downregulated gene in DNA replication pathway following CARMN overexpression. We confirmed CARMN can produce miR143-3p from its exon5 which is DROSHA and DICER dependent, resulting binding and decrease of MCM5. Moreover, suppressing miR143-3p can weaken function of CARMN in suppressing tumorigenesis and promoting chemosensitivity.
Our results indicated lncRNA CARMN is a predictive biomarker of better prognosis and enhanced cisplatin sensitivity in TNBC. CARMN is the host gene of miR143-3p which downregulates MCM5, causing inhibited DNA replication.
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) with estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) all negative accounts for 15% of all breast cancer. Compared with other subtypes of breast cancer, TNBC is more likely to appear in young patients, with the worst prognosis due to its high capability of invasion, heterogeneous behavior and lack of effective treatment target . To date, chemotherapy is still the main treatment for TNBC patients. However, clinical benefit of chemotherapy for TNBC is often blocked by the chemoresistance . Thus, increasing sensitivity of existed chemotherapy regimens and exploring novel therapeutic targets to improve the overall prognosis for TNBC are of urgent.
Growing evidences showed long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) act as critical factors in tumorigenesis and tumor progression as well as therapeutic sensitivity [3, 4]. Although with no or low capability to translate into protein, lncRNAs play a pivotal role in many biological processes and diseases development . However, molecular mechanism for lncRNAs regulating TNBC progression and chemotherapy resistance are still not fully understood. LncRNA Cardiac Mesoderm Enhancer-associated Noncoding RNA (CARMN) is a lncRNA extremely downregulated in TNBC tissues. CARMN located at chromosome 5q32 and was first reported in 2015  as a cell identity related gene expression, regulating differentiation of human cardiac precursor cell. Till now, CARMN’s role in breast cancer has never been reported.
Here, we initially demonstrated that CARMN was decreased along with breast tissue malignant transformation whose overexpression was linked to better prognosis and better response of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Further experiments demonstrated CARMN synergistically inhibit cancer development and increase cisplatin sensitivity in TNBC by regulating essential pathways in tumorigenesis and cisplatin related processes, especially inhibiting DNA replication. Mechanistically, CARMN acts as host gene of miR143-3p which targets an essential DNA replication license gene MCM5. Restoration of CARMN is a potential target for breast malignant transformation, cancer development and enhancing cisplatin sensitivity.
Patients whose tumor tissues were used for evaluating the role of CARMN in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy all participated in a randomized, open-label, prospective phase III clinical trial of Renji hospital, in which patients received weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable local-advanced breast cancer. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. as NCT02221999 (date of registration: August 21, 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02221999?term=NCT02221999&draw=2&rank=1). Inclusion and eligible criteria mainly include: 18 to 70 years old; with large operable breast cancer (T2-4N0-3M0); without prior systemic therapy for breast cancer or tolerate with chemotherapy. All the patients hospitalized and were diagnosed breast cancer with Elite biopsy system as previously described .
Paired breast cancer and normal breast tissues were also obtained from patients who underwent mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy after diagnosed as breast cancer with biopsy before surgery in Renji Hospital. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Renji Hospital (No.2017–088) following the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. All participants provided written informed consent to take part in the study.
Breast cancer cell lines and normal breast cell MCF10A were obtained from Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. MCF10A was cultured with DMEM medium (Gibco, USA) with 5% horse serum (Gibco, USA), hydrocortisone (0.5 lg/ml), insulin (10 lg/ ml), EGF (20 ng/ml), cholera toxin (100 ng/ml) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Other cell lines were cultured with DMEM medium (Gibco, USA) with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Gibco, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin in 37 °C with 5% CO2.
RNA isolation and qRT-PCR
Total RNA of tissues or cells was extracted by TRIzol (Invitrogen, USA). RNA of nuclear and cytoplasm were separated with separation kit purchased from Norgenbiotek (Canada, Lot 594,895). Isolated RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with Reverse Transcription Kit (Takara, Japan). Reverse-transcription of miRNA was done with miRcute plus miR first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Tiangen, China). QPCR was done with SYBR Premix Ex TaqII (Takara, Japan) and miRcute plus miR qPCR detection kit (Tiangen, China). RT-qPCR result was detected with light cycler instrument (LightCycler 480 II, Roche, Germany). The expression of lncRNA and protein coding RNA was normalized by β-actin and miRNA expression was normalized by U6. The primers of detected RNAs are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Expression of detected RNAs was calculated by 2-ΔΔCT.
Cell transfection with lentivirus, lncRNA smart silencer, miRNA inhibitor, miRNA mimics siRNA and plasmid
Cells were transfected with lentivirus vectors overexpressing CARMN or control ones (purchased from GenePharma Shanghai, China) for stably overexpressing CARMN. CARMN smart silencer  was bought from Ribobio (Guangzhou, China).
MiR143-3p inhibitor and inhibitor control (GenePharma, Shanghai, China), miR143-3p mimics (purchased from Genomeditech, China), siRNA of DROSHA/DICER1/MCM5 (purchased from Genomeditech, China), plasmid overexpressing exon5 of CARMN (purchased from Genechem, Shanghai, China), whose sequence are all listed in Supplementary Table 2, were transfected with Polyplus Transfection jetPRIME (France). After 48 h, the cells were collected for detecting efficiency and further use.
Cell proliferation and migration assay
Cell proliferation was detected at 0 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h was detected with Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo, Japan). For colony formation assay, cells were seeded in 6-well plate and were fixed, stained and observed under microscope after 14 days. For migration assay, cells were seeded in 24-well transwell plate upper chamber. Cells were cultured in serum-free medium in the upper chamber and medium with serum in the lower chamber. After 24 h, the cells at bottom of the filters were fixed and stained for obtaining and counting.
Drug sensitivity assay
Cells were treated with different concentration of cisplatin (CSNpharm, Chicago, USA): 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.13, 1.56, 0.78, 0.39, 0.20, 0.10 and 0 μg/ml). Cell activity was detected by CCK8 assay after 24 h.
EdU cell proliferation assay
Cells were treated with 5 μg/ml cisplatin or blank for 24 h. Cells were stained with EdU with EdU Cell Proliferation Kit with Alexa Fluor 488 (BeyoClick, China) following manufacture’s protocol. Hoechst was stained as well for identifying cell nucleus.
Western blot and antibodies
Primary antibodies of MCM5 (11703–1-AP, anti-rabbit 1500) and ACTIN (ab49900, HRP, 1:1000) were purchased from Proteintech (Chicago, USA) and Abcam (Cambridge, UK) respectively. Primary antibodies of DROSHA (AF6732, 1:500) and DICER1 (AF6702, 1:500) were purchased from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). Secondary antibody (A0208, 1:2000) was bought from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) was performed with Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore, Billerica, USA) and Chemidoc Touching Imaging System (Biorad, California, USA) was used for observing results.
The cells were stained with DAPI stain and β-tubulin antibody (Servicebio, Hubei, Wuhan). Immunofluorenscence antibody of MCM5 (11703–1-AP, anti-rabbit 1:100) was purchased from Proteintech (Chicago, USA). Secondary antibody with Alexa Fluor 488(A0423, 1:500) was purchased from Beyotime (Shanghai, China).
Cell cycle and apoptosis assay
For cell cycle assay, cells were collected and stained with propidium iodide (PI) using Cell Cycle Assay Kit - PI/RNase Staining (Dojindo, Japan) following manufacture’s protocol. For cell apoptosis assay, cells were treated with cDDP (10 μg/ml) or blank control for 24 h. Later, cells were labeled with Annexin-V FITC and PI using Apoptosis Detection Kit (Dojindo, Japan). LSRFortessa (BD) was then used for flow cytometry analysis.
RNA transcriptome sequencing
Sequencing libraries generation was performed using NEBNextR UltraTM Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for IlluminaR (NEB, USA) following manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina Hiseq Xten platform was used for library preparations sequence. Gene expression levels were calculated by fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM). Differential expression analysis of two different CARMN expression condition groups was performed with R package “DESeq” under threshold of adjusted P-value < 0.05 and absolute value of fold change> 1.5.
Luciferase reporter assay
Binding site of miR143-3p and MCM5 was predicted with STARBASE  (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/index.php). Luciferase reporter vectors (pMIR-CMV Vector, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) with wild-type MCM5 or mutant MCM5 in predicted binding site were constructed. MDA-MB-231 cells were co-transfected with luciferase reporter vectors and miR143-3p or negative control mimics. Reporter luciferase activity was detected after 48 h by Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) with Renilla luciferase activity for normalization.
Experiments in vivo
Female BALB/c nude mice (SLAC, Shanghai, China) were used for breast cancer xenograft model. CARMN overexpressed or control MDA-MB-468 cells was injected into subcutaneous flanks of 5-week-old nude mice. All mice were sacrificed 6 weeks after injection and xenografts were taken out for weighting. Experiments in vivo were performed following protocol approved by Shanghai Jiao Tong University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Renji Hospital Animal Care guidelines. To minimize animal suffering, all efforts were made.
TUNEL assay of xenografts was implied with TUNEL kit from Roche (Basel, Switzerland) in xenografts following manufacture’s protocol.
TCGA and GEO datasets were analyzed by R packages “TCGAbiolinks” and “limma”, also online tool GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html) . The survival of breast cancer cohort was analyzed with K-M plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/index.php?p=background) . KEGG and GO pathway enrichment was carried out with R package “clusterProfiler”, “DOSE” and “enrichplot” [12, 13]. GSEA pathway enrichment was carried out with software GSEA (version 4.0.1) . Genome information of CARMN and miRNA was obtained from ENSEMBL (http://uswest.ensembl.org), NCBI gene (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). and miRbase (http://www.mirbase.org).
Statistical analysis and figures were conducted with R (3.4.3) and Graphpad Prism (8.1.1). Two-side p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
More details of materials and methods are described in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
LncRNA CARMN is a biomarker for prognosis and malignant transformation in breast cancer
Differentially expressed lncRNAs between breast cancer and normal breast tissues were screened from TCGA dataset, GSE45827, GSE31192, GSE3744 and GSE21422 (FDR < 0.05, |log2FC| > 2). Only one lncRNA CARMN showed differently expressed in all 5 datasets with the same tendency (Fig. 1A).
Decrease of CARMN in breast cancers samples comparing with paired normal tissues was confirmed in two cohorts (Fig. 1B, C, Figure S1A) with outstanding capability in discriminating tumor from normal tissue evaluated by ROC curve (Figure S1B). In TCGA dataset, CARMN was downregulated in each stage of breast cancer comparing with normal samples (Fig. 1D). More evidences confirmed that CARMN is closely correlated with different phase of malignant transformation. In GSE7377, CARMN shows lower expression in premalignant hyperplastic enlarged lobular units (HELU) than in paired normal terminal duct lobular units (TDLU) (Fig. 1D, Figure S1C). In GSE21422, CARMN in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was lower than that in normal breast tissue and was obviously higher than that in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) at the same time (Fig. 1E). Besides breast cancer, CARMN is also significantly downregulated in many other cancers (Figure S1D).
CARMN was differently expressed in different subtypes of breast cancer (Fig. 1G), in which TNBC has the lowest expression of CARMN and luminal A breast cancer has the highest expression of CARMN. The low expression of CARMN in TNBC was also validated in TCGA dataset (Fig. 1H).
High expression of CARMN was also related with better prognosis in breast cancer patients, especially in patients with TNBC. Upregulation of CARMN is a strong predictor of longer relapse free survival and overall survival (Fig. 1I, J) in all breast cancer cohort and local advanced breast cancer cohort (Fig. 1 K). In TNBC cohort, CARMN also indicated longer relapse free survival (Fig. 1 L). However, survival benefit in ER+ or HER2+ breast cancer didn’t have statistical significance (Figure S1E, S1F).
CARMN is a biomarker for high chemotherapy sensitivity in breast cancer
In patients who received weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (Table 1), valuable factors in predicting NAC response including CARMN and other clinicopathological factors were selected with LASSO regression (Fig. 2A, B). CARMN was significantly related with NAC pathological completer response (pCR) in the multivariate logistics regression model combined with selected variables (Fig. 2C, Table 2). Then, we established nomogram for predicting possibility of NAC pCR with selected factors (Fig. 2D). With practical nomogram combing CARMN and clinicopathological factors, pCR rate could be predicted through total point of each single patient. ROC curve compared performance of different predicting models (Fig. 2E), showing model combining CARMN and clinicopathological factors has higher efficiency in pCR prediction. Calibration curve also indicated high efficiency of the model (Fig. 2F). According to decision curve (Fig. 2G), the model including CARMN and clinicopathological factors showed more clinical benefit than the model without CARMN. In another validation set, the prediction model exhibited sufficient AUC of ROC curve (Fig. 2H). Moreover, we also identified a significant upregulation of CARMN in ER- breast cancer with pCR (Fig. 2I, J).
CARMN is a suppressor of TNBC and enhances cisplatin sensitivity in vivo and in vitro
To elucidated CARMN’s role in triple negative breast cancer, CARMN expression and cisplatin sensitivity was detected in different breast cancer cell lines, including 4 TNBC cell lines (Figure S2A, S2B). In 4 TNBC cell lines, CARMN distributed mainly in nuclear, rather than in cytoplasm (Figure S2C). We overexpressed CARMN in TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells with relatively lower CARMN expression (Fig. 3A). CARMN overexpression significantly inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation of TNBC cells (Fig. 3B and C). Migration ability of cells was also obviously suppressed in CARMN overexpressed cells (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, CARMN overexpression caused more failure of cytokinesis, indicating more cancer cells failed in successfully separated into two cells  (Figure S2D). CARMN sensitized TNBC cells to cisplatin with lower IC50 (Fig. 3E). Apoptosis assay also demonstrated higher ratio of cell apoptosis after cisplatin treatment in CARMN upregulated cells (Fig. 3F).
We inhibited CARMN expression in TNBC cell lines Hs578T and BT20 with relatively higher CARMN level (Figure S2E). Inhibition of CARMN promoted TNBC proliferation (Figure S2F, S2G) and migration (Figure S2H). Cisplatin sensitivity also decreased following CARMN silence (Figure S2I) and lower rate of cell apoptosis was observed in CARMN inhibited cells (Figure S2J).
We injected MDA-MB-468 cells stably overexpressing CARMN or control cells into 5-week nude mouse flank and treated them with cisplatin or saline respectively. Firstly, we observed decrease in both tumor volume and tumor weight with CARMN overexpressed cells compared with control cells (Fig. 3G, H), with lower level of Ki67/PCNA positive rate (Fig. 3I) and higher level of TUNEL positive rate (Fig. 3J). Furthermore, cisplatin can reduce tumor growth more efficiently in CARMN overexpressed group than in control group (Fig. 3G, H). Comparison of xenografts treated with cisplatin showed significant elevation of TUNEL positive cells in CARMN overexpressed tumors (Fig. 3J).
CARMN is correlated with various cisplatin resistance and cancer related pathways
RNA-seq of CARMN overexpressed and control MDA-MB-231 cells was applied to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and potential target of CARMN. Under threshold of FDR < 0.05, fold change> 1.5, 638 DEGs were screened, including 262 downregulated genes and 376 upregulated genes (Fig. 4A, S3A, S3B). KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs indicated CARMN participates in various pathways correlate with both cisplatin action and tumorigenesis including DNA replication, cell cycle, base excision repair, mismatch repair and microRNAs in cancer etc. (Fig. 4B, S3C, S3D). Statistical analysis showed DNA replication was the pathway with highest rich factor and showed globally downregulation in CARMN overexpressed cells. Besides KEGG, GO enrichment showed similar tendency, suggesting CARMN was related to pathways in cancer biological process in which DNA replication initiation was the most enriched pathway (Fig. 4C, S3F-S3H). GSEA enrichment analysis (Fig. 4D) demonstrated overexpression of CARMN caused downregulation of DNA repair, G2/M Checkpoint, Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and upregulation of apoptosis. Most DEGs in DNA replication, cell cycle and DNA repair pathways were downregulated when CARMN was overexpressed (Figure S4A).
DNA replication related DEGs were negatively correlated with CARMN expression in TCGA breast cancer cohort especially in TNBC cohort (Fig. 4E, Figure S4B). DNA replication DEGs were confirmed by RT-qPCR assay in CARMN overexpressed or control MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells and observed a general downregulation in these genes (Fig. 4F). Minichromosome maintenance complex component 5 (MCM5) was the most downregulated gene in both CARMN overexpressed MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells (Fig. 4F) which was also lower in protein level (Fig. 4G). After silencing CARMN expression, MCM5 significantly upregulated in Hs578T and BT20 cells in both mRNA (Figure S4C) and protein level (Figure S4D).
CARMN inhibits DNA replication and regulates cell cycle in TNBC
EdU foci was obviously decreased in CARMN overexpressed cells showing DNA replication activity is inhibited (Fig. 5A). In cells treated with cisplatin (5 μg/ml), EdU foci was also lower in CARMN overexpressing cells (Fig. 5A). MCM5 staining was also weaker in CARMN overexpressed cells than in control cells (Fig. 5B). In addition, CARMN overexpressing groups showed decreased percentage of S phase cells (Fig. 5C). Correspondingly, CARMN inhibited cells showed higher DNA replication activity (Figure S5A) and higher MCM5 fluorescence intensity (Figure S5B) in CARMN inhibited cells. CARMN silenced groups showed higher rate of S phase cells (Figure S5C).
After treated with cisplatin (5 μg/ml), CARMN is upregulated in all four TNBC cells (Fig. 5E, S5E). We conclude that CARMN can inhibit DNA replication activity and CARMN upregulation is feedback of cisplatin treatment.
CARMN promotes cisplatin sensitivity through producing miR143-3p which targets MCM5
To further understand the potential effect of CARMN, we investigated the mechanism for dysregulation of MCM5 by CARMN. We predicted binding miRNAs and mRNAs of MCM5 and CARMN. In miRNAs binding with MCM5, we noticed miR143-3p which is embedded in CARMN (Supplementary Table 3), is predicted to combine 3’UTR of MCM5 according to both microT and miRanda [16,17,18]. Interestingly, in previous researches, CARMN was reported as the host gene of miR143 , suggesting that CARMN is the precursor of miR143 and could produce miR143. Through transcript sequence, oligonucleotide sequence of pre-miR143 and mature miR143-3p are confirmed to be embedded in exon5 of CARMN (Fig. 6A). There was a significant correlation among CARMN, miR143-3p and MCM5 expression in TCGA TNBC dataset (Fig. 6B). MiR143-3p was also remarkably upregulated in CARMN overexpressed cells (Fig. 6C). Given that published researches have already demonstrated miR143-3p can inhibit cell proliferation and sensitize cells to cisplatin [19, 20], CARMN possibly function partially by producing miR143-3p which can inhibit MCM5 by combining 3’UTR.
In TNBC cells with or without overexpressing CARMN, inhibition of miR143-3p (Fig. 6D) promoted cell proliferation and weakened suppression of cell proliferation by CARMN (Fig. 6E, F). In addition, inhibition of miR143-3p decreased cell sensitivity to cisplatin (Fig. 6G), with higher rate of cell apoptosis (Fig. 6H). Relationship between miR143-3p and CARMN was also demonstrated in CARMN silenced cells (Figure S6A). Overexpression miR143-3p (Figure S6B) in CARMN silenced or control cells led to inhibited proliferation ability (Figure S6C, S6D) and higher cisplatin sensitivity (Figure S6E, S6F).
Furthermore, to validate origin of miR143-3p, we overexpressed exon5 of CARMN (Fig. 7A) in which miR143-3p was embedded. MiR143-3p was obviously increased together with overexpression of CARMN exon5 (Fig. 7B), indicating that exon5 of CARMN was related with miR143-3p producing. MCM5 also showed lower expression in CARMN exon5 overexpressed cells (Fig. 7C).
Ribonuclease (RNase) III enzymes Drosha and Dicer are two important enzymes splicing precursor of miRNA and producing mature miRNA . We silenced DROSHA and DICER1 (Dicer in Homo sapiens) in TNBC cell lines with or without CARMN exon5 overexpression (Figure S6G). Inhibited DROSHA and DICER1 decreased miR143-3p expression (Fig. 7D) and increased CARMN and CARMN exon5 expression (Fig. 7E), indicating miR143-3p production of CARMN and CARMN exon5 is Drosha and Dicer dependent.
To confirm combination of MCM5 with miR143-3p, we designed MCM5 mutated plasmid in 2 predicted combination area (Fig. 7F). Dual-luciferase assay confirmed combination of MCM5 and miR143-3p in both two predicted sites (Fig. 7F).
Combination between miR143-3p and MCM5 caused decreased MCM5 in both mRNA and protein level (Fig. 7G, S6H). MiR143-3p inhibition in CARMN exon5 overexpressed cells and control ones (Fig. 7H) also caused MCM5 upregulation (Fig. 7I).
To further confirm the production of miR143-3p of CARMN and CARMN exon5, we overexpressed CARMN in normal breast epithelium cell MCF10A (Figure S7A). We also discovered upregulated miR143-3p (Figure S7B) and inhibited MCM5 expression in CARMN overexpressed MCF10A (Figure S7C, S7D), which was also observed in CARMN exon5 transfected MCF10A cells (Figure S7E-S7H). Moreover, Exon5 of CARMN, in which miR143-3p was embedded, showed similar function of suppressing cell proliferation (Figure S8A, S8B) and sensitizing cisplatin as CARMN (Figure S8C, S8D).
With insufficient treatment targets, TNBC is more dependent on chemotherapy compared with the other subtypes of breast cancer, demanding precise biomarkers for suitable treatment strategy. Results in this research indicated CARMN is not only an efficient biomarker for identification of malignant transformation, but also a valuable predictive factor for prognosis and chemosensitivity for breast cancer. Our further exploration in molecular mechanism confirmed CARMN restoration as a potential target for anti-tumor and cisplatin resistance in TNBC.
Originally, CARMN exhibited essential role in modulating specification and differentiation of human cardiac precursor cell in published studies . As a differentiation regulator, loss of CARMN can possibly lead to tumorigenesis and CARMN exhaustion is observed in many types of cancers. Although CARMN is a lncRNA significantly downregulated in TNBC, no research has mentioned CARMN’s role in TNBC. It is worth noting that we made the first demonstration that CARMN could suppress tumor malignant transformation, inhibit cancer cell proliferation and enhance cisplatin response synergistically in TNBC.
Our research firstly unmasked association between CARMN and cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Nearly half of the TNBC is able to obtain pathological complete response (pCR) after platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy , which brings to significantly improved prognosis. Nevertheless, high rate of platinum resistance still limits clinical benefit from platinum-based neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, identifying biomarkers for platinum sensitivity and target for elevating platinum sensitivity is now indispensable for TNBC treatment. Cisplatin causes DNA double strand breaks (DSB) which is mainly repaired through nucleotide excision repair (NER) during S phase . RNA-Seq results showed CARMN was associated with cisplatin resistance and tumorigenesis pathways, which was in line with the results of in vivo and in vitro studies. Surprisingly, we discovered a global downregulation in MCM complex combined with MCM2–7, in which MCM5 was the lowest one. As evolutionary conserved proteins, MCM2–7 complex is recruited at origin recognition complex (ORC) region and act as a “license” of eukaryotes DNA replication, ensuring chromosome replication happen only one time in each cell cycle and undergo successful replication procedure . As a member of MCM2–7 complex, persistent expression of MCM5 was reported to cause malign differentiation independently [25, 26]. Clinically, staining of MCM members was found to be obviously correlated with severity of dysplasia and was even reported to be better biomarker than widely used markers as PCNA and Ki67 [27, 28]. Consistently, Hang et al. also found high expression of all members of MCM complex in breast cancer was related with shorter survival time . Despite initiating DNA replication, deficit of MCM complex, and also other DNA replication genes can cause replicative stress characterized with more DSBs and higher level of replicative fork instability. Elevated DSBs and replicative fork instability trigger elimination of cancer cells  and importantly enhance response of cytotoxic drugs interacting with DNA like platinum . Thereby, we conclude exhaustion of DNA replication genes including MCM complex is one of the mechanisms explaining both enhanced cisplatin chemosensitivity and decreased proliferation ability in CARMN highly expressed cells. Despite MCM5 targeted by CARMN in current research, relationship between CARMN and the other members of MCM complex also need to be deeply explored in the future.
In our research is the first revealing regulation of MCM5 by CARMN was carried out by producing miR143-3p from exon5, which can target MCM5. According to previously studies about lncRNA and microRNA, lncRNAs are usually reported to act as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNA) of miRNAs  while lncRNAs act as precursor or host gene of miRNA is relatively infrequent. Our results suggested CARMN acted as host gene of miR143-3p and functioned by upregulating derived miR143-3p. In genome location, majority of known mammalian miRNAs are within introns of protein-coding or non-coding transcription units (TU), and 10% are within exons of them, so called host gene . Host genes undergo several procedures to successively produce embedded miRNA, including splicing of miRNA precursor or pri-miRNA by DROSHA in nuclear and splicing of pre-miRNA by Dicer in cytoplasm . The relationship between function and regulation of miRNAs and their host genes is still ambiguous. There’s evidence that host genes may function partially by producing derived miRNAs. One reported example is miR675 which embedded in exon1 of its host gene lncRNA H19. H19 is found to be downregulated together with miR675 in prostate cancer and takes part in biological processes through miRNA’s combination with its downstream . The same model can explain the role of CARMN in TNBC. We are the first to demonstrate miR143-3p is derived from exon5 of CARMN. Inhibition of miR143-3p can decrease the ability of CARMN in suppressing proliferation and chemotherapy sensitivity, by targeting an important DNA replication related gene MCM5. Thus, the relationship between host gene CARMN and miR143-3p mentioned in our research offers new evidence in understanding the mode of miRNAs and their host genes.
What further support our results is that the role of miR143 in suppressing different cancers including breast cancer has been reported previously through regulating various pathways [36,37,38,39]. In terms of drug sensitivity, miR143-3p was also reported to sensitize cisplatin and inhibit tumor progression in gastric cancer . Our results verify chemotherapy sensitizing and anti-tumor function of miR143-3p in TNBC and we also identified MCM5 as a new target of miR143-3p.
There still exists several limitations in our research. First, our RNA-seq showed CARMN may potentially regulated many cancer-related genes and pathways in which we only explored the most enriched pathway DNA replication and DNA replication related gene MCM5. Other possible down stream of CARMN will be further studied in the future. Secondly, our patients administrated cisplatin-paclitaxel regimens, while in experiment in vitro and in vivo we only verified the association between cisplatin and CARMN. Thus, the role of CARMN on paclitaxel or cisplatin plus paclitaxel should be explored in the future.
In conclusion, we initially elucidated lncRNA CARMN could generate better response to cisplatin-contained neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC. According to experiments in vivo and in vitro, CARMN enhances cisplatin sensitivity and inhibits cell proliferation in TNBC. CARMN participates in cisplatin resistance and tumorigenesis related pathways, especially DNA replication. It is further confirmed that high CARMN expression suppresses DNA replication activity. CARMN is also increased as feedback of cisplatin treatment. CARMN sensitizes cisplatin and represses development of TNBC through increasing miR143-3p as its host gene, and miR143-3p targets at a crucial DNA replication licenser MCM5, which may cause abnormal DNA replication (Fig. 8). Our results provide restoration of CARMN as potential therapeutic target and prognostic predicting marker for TNBC.
Availability of data and materials
TCGA dataset used in the current study can be accessed from: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov. GEO datasets used in the current study can be accessed from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. RNA-seq data are not publicly available yet, but can be available from the corresponding author, Dr. Jinsong Lu (email address: email@example.com).
Triple negative breast cancer
Long noncoding RNAs
Cardiac Mesoderm Enhancer-associated Noncoding RNA
The Cancer Genome Atlas
Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins
- 95% CI:
95% confidence interval
Pathological complete response
Receiver operating characteristic
Area under curve
Brewster AM, Chavez-MacGregor M, Brown P. Epidemiology, biology, and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer in women of African ancestry. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(13):e625–e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70364-X.
Bai X, Ni J, Beretov J, Graham P, Li Y. Triple-negative breast cancer therapeutic resistance: where is the Achilles’ heel? Cancer Lett. 2021;497:100–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2020.10.016.
Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, Wong DJ, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010;464(7291):1071–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08975.
Gu P, Chen X, Xie R, Han J, Xie W, Wang B, et al. lncRNA HOXD-AS1 regulates proliferation and chemo-resistance of castration-resistant prostate Cancer via recruiting WDR5. Mol Ther. 2017;25(8):1959–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.04.016.
Wapinski O, Chang HY. Long noncoding RNAs and human disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21(6):354–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.001.
Ounzain S, Micheletti R, Arnan C, Plaisance I, Cecchi D, Schroen B, et al. CARMEN, a human super enhancer-associated long noncoding RNA controlling cardiac specification, differentiation and homeostasis. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;89(Pt A):98–112.
Sheng X, Wang Y, Yang F, Lin Y, Xu S, Yin W, et al. Ultrasound-guided breast biopsy: improved accuracy of 10-G cable-free elite compared with 14-G CCNB. J Surg Res. 2020;247:172–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.025.
Zou Y, Xu S, Xiao Y, Qiu Q, Shi M, Wang J, et al. Long noncoding RNA LERFS negatively regulates rheumatoid synovial aggression and proliferation. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(10):4510–24. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI97965.
Li JH, Liu S, Zhou H, Qu LH, Yang JH. starBase v2.0: decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D92–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1248.
Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1):W98–W102. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx247.
Györffy B, Lanczky A, Eklund AC, Denkert C, Budczies J, Li Q, et al. An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(3):725–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0674-9.
Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16(5):284–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118.
Yu G, Wang LG, Yan GR, He QY. DOSE: an R/Bioconductor package for disease ontology semantic and enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(4):608–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu684.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15545–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102.
Lens SMA, Medema RH. Cytokinesis defects and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(1):32–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-018-0084-6.
Paraskevopoulou MD, Georgakilas G, Kostoulas N, Vlachos IS, Vergoulis T, Reczko M, et al. DIANA-microT web server v5.0: service integration into miRNA functional analysis workflows. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Web Server issue):W169–73.
Reczko M, Maragkakis M, Alexiou P, Grosse I, Hatzigeorgiou AG. Functional microRNA targets in protein coding sequences. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(6):771–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts043.
Betel D, Wilson M, Gabow A, Marks DS, Sander C. The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(Database issue):D149–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm995.
Chen Z, Li Z, Soutto M, Wang W, Piazuelo MB, Zhu S, et al. Integrated analysis of mouse and human gastric neoplasms identifies conserved microRNA networks in gastric carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(4):1127–39 e8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.052.
Noguchi S, Mori T, Hoshino Y, Maruo K, Yamada N, Kitade Y, et al. MicroRNA-143 functions as a tumor suppressor in human bladder cancer T24 cells. Cancer Lett. 2011;307(2):211–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2011.04.005.
Kim YK, Kim VN. Processing of intronic microRNAs. EMBO J. 2007;26(3):775–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601512.
Poggio F, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Ponde NF, La Valle G, Del Mastro L, et al. Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(7):1497–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy127.
Galluzzi L, Senovilla L, Vitale I, Michels J, Martins I, Kepp O, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance. Oncogene. 2012;31(15):1869–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2011.384.
Tye BK. MCM proteins in DNA replication. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68(1):649–86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.649.
Going JJ, Keith WN, Neilson L, Stoeber K, Stuart RC, Williams GH. Aberrant expression of minichromosome maintenance proteins 2 and 5, and Ki-67 in dysplastic squamous oesophageal epithelium and Barrett's mucosa. Gut. 2002;50(3):373–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.50.3.373.
Afanasyeva EA, Mestdagh P, Kumps C, Vandesompele J, Ehemann V, Theissen J, et al. MicroRNA miR-885-5p targets CDK2 and MCM5, activates p53 and inhibits proliferation and survival. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18(6):974–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2010.164.
Semple JW, Duncker BP. ORC-associated replication factors as biomarkers for cancer. Biotechnol Adv. 2004;22(8):621–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.06.001.
Freeman A, Morris LS, Mills AD, Stoeber K, Laskey RA, Williams GH, et al. Minichromosome maintenance proteins as biological markers of dysplasia and malignancy. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5(8):2121–32.
Kwok HF, Zhang SD, McCrudden CM, Yuen HF, Ting KP, Wen Q, et al. Prognostic significance of minichromosome maintenance proteins in breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5(1):52–71.
Bailis JM, Forsburg SL. MCM proteins: DNA damage, mutagenesis and repair. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004;14(1):17–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2003.11.002.
Belanger F, Fortier E, Dube M, Lemay JF, Buisson R, Masson JY, et al. Replication protein a availability during DNA replication stress is a major determinant of cisplatin resistance in ovarian Cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2018;78(19):5561–73. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0618.
Kopp F, Mendell JT. Functional classification and experimental dissection of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2018;172(3):393–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.011.
Abelson MB, Ferzola NJ, McWhirter CL, Crampton HJ. Efficacy and safety of single- and multiple-dose ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in a pediatric population. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2004;15(6):551–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2004.00146.x.
Cullen BR. Transcription and processing of human microRNA precursors. Mol Cell. 2004;16(6):861–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.002.
Zhu M, Chen Q, Liu X, Sun Q, Zhao X, Deng R, et al. lncRNA H19/miR-675 axis represses prostate cancer metastasis by targeting TGFBI. FEBS J. 2014;281(16):3766–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12902.
Dong P, Xiong Y, Hanley SJB, Yue J, Watari H. Musashi-2, a novel oncoprotein promoting cervical cancer cell growth and invasion, is negatively regulated by p53-induced miR-143 and miR-107 activation. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36(1):150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-017-0617-y.
Noguchi S, Yasui Y, Iwasaki J, Kumazaki M, Yamada N, Naito S, et al. Replacement treatment with microRNA-143 and -145 induces synergistic inhibition of the growth of human bladder cancer cells by regulating PI3K/Akt and MAPK signaling pathways. Cancer Lett. 2013;328(2):353–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2012.10.017.
Wach S, Brandl M, Borchardt H, Weigelt K, Lukat S, Nolte E, et al. Exploring the MIR143-UPAR Axis for the inhibition of human prostate Cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;16:272–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2019.02.020.
Chen J, Yu Y, Li H, Hu Q, Chen X, He Y, et al. Long non-coding RNA PVT1 promotes tumor progression by regulating the miR-143/HK2 axis in gallbladder cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0947-9.
This work was supported by Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (20DZ2201600), Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (SHDC2020CR3003A), Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for Translational Medicine [Grant Number TM201908], the Nurturing Fund of Renji Hospital [Grant Numbers PYMDT-002], the Shanghai Rising Stars of Medical Talent Youth Development Program for Outstanding Youth Medical Talents [2018–16], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Numbers 82002777], Multidisciplinary Cross Research Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [Grant Number YG2019QNA26 and ZH2018QNA42], Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [Grant Numbers 19ZR1431100].
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Renji Hospital following the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Experiments in vivo were performed following protocol approved by Shanghai Jiao Tong University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Renji Hospital Animal Care guidelines.
Consent for publication
All contributing authors agree to the publication of this article.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
CARMN is a valuable biomarker in distinguishing tumor from normal tissue. Supplementary Figure 2. CARMN regulates cell proliferation and cisplatin sensitivity of TNBC. Supplementary Figure 3. RNA-seq indicates CARMN participating in essential cancer related pathways. Supplementary Figure 4. CARMN participates in DNA replication and downregulates DNA replication related genes. Supplementary Figure 5. CARMN suppression causes suppressed DNA replication and altered cell cycle distribution in TNBC. Supplementary Figure 6. MiR143-3p inhibits proliferation and cisplatin sensitivity in TNBC. Supplementary Figure 7. Confirmation of CARMN/miR143-3p/MCM5 axis in normal breast epithelium cell line MCF10A. Supplementary Figure 8. CARMN exon5 inhibits TNBC cell proliferation and promotes cisplatin sensitivity. Supplementary Figure 9. MCM5 promotes TNBC cell proliferation and decreases cisplatin sensitivity. Supplementary Figure 10. MiR143-3p and MCM5 are both prognostic factors of breast cancer and TNBC.
Primers of qRT-PCR. Supplementary Table 2. Sequence of siRNAs, miR143-3p inhibitor and miR-143-3p mimics. Supplementary Table 3. miRNAs predicted to bind with MCM5.
About this article
Cite this article
Sheng, X., Dai, H., Du, Y. et al. LncRNA CARMN overexpression promotes prognosis and chemosensitivity of triple negative breast cancer via acting as miR143-3p host gene and inhibiting DNA replication. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 40, 205 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02015-4
- Triple negative breast cancer
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Predictive and prognostic biomarker
- Host gene