Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

cPLA2 blockade attenuates S100A7-mediated breast tumorigenicity by inhibiting the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research volume 41, Article number: 54 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Molecular mechanisms underlying inflammation-associated breast tumor growth are poorly studied. S100A7, a pro-inflammatory molecule has been shown to enhance breast cancer growth and metastasis. However, the S100A7-mediated molecular mechanisms in enhancing tumor growth and metastasis are unclear.

Methods

Human breast cancer tissue and plasma samples were used to analyze the expression of S100A7, cPLA2, and PGE2. S100A7-overexpressing or downregulated human metastatic breast cancer cells were used to evaluate the S100A7-mediated downstream signaling mechanisms. Bi-transgenic mS100a7a15 overexpression, TNBC C3 (1)/Tag transgenic, and humanized patient-derived xenograft mouse models and cPLA2 inhibitor (AACOCF3) were used to investigate the role of S100A7/cPLA2/PGE2 signaling in tumor growth and metastasis. Additionally, CODEX, a highly advanced multiplexed imaging was employed to delineate the effects of S100A7/cPLA2 inhibition on the recruitment of various immune cells.

Results

In this study, we found that S100A7 and cPLA2 are highly expressed and correlate with decreased overall survival in breast cancer patients. Further mechanistic studies revealed that S100A7/RAGE signaling promotes the expression of cPLA2 to mediate its oncogenic effects. Pharmacological inhibition of cPLA2 suppressed S100A7-mediated tumor growth and metastasis in multiple pre-clinical models including transgenic and humanized patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models. The attenuation of cPLA2 signaling reduced S100A7-mediated recruitment of immune-suppressive myeloid cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Interestingly, we discovered that the S100A7/cPLA2 axis enhances the immunosuppressive microenvironment by increasing prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Furthermore, CO-Detection by indEXing (CODEX) imaging-based analyses revealed that cPLA2 inhibition increased the infiltration of activated and proliferating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the TME. In addition, CD163+ tumor associated-macrophages were positively associated with S100A7 and cPLA2 expression in malignant breast cancer patients.

Conclusions

Our study provides new mechanistic insights on the cross-talk between S100A7/cPLA2 in enhancing breast tumor growth and metastasis by generating an immunosuppressive TME that inhibits the infiltration of cytotoxic T cells. Furthermore, our studies indicate that S100A7/cPLA2 could be used as novel prognostic marker and cPLA2 inhibitors as promising drugs against S100A7-overexpressing aggressive breast cancer.

Background

Early metastasis to distant organs is a major clinical hurdle in improving the overall and recurrence-free survival of invasive breast cancer patients. Inflammatory immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (iTME) contributes to cancer cell survival, proliferation, aberrant angiogenesis, early metastasis, and resistance to established chemo or hormonal therapies [1]. S100A7 (Psoriasin) is a pro-inflammatory secreted protein that regulates breast cancer growth and metastasis [2,3,4]. Previous reports from others and our group have shown that S100A7 significantly contributes to breast tumor growth [2,3,4,5]. S100A7 mediates breast cancer growth by enhancing inflammatory signaling cascades [5, 6]. In addition, S100A7 regulates the expression of various pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL1-α, CXCL-1/8, oncostatin-M, and IL-6 [5, 7]. S100A7 has been shown to mediate its oncogenic effects through its receptor; Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products (RAGE) [8]. However, the downstream inflammatory oncogenic signaling cascades essential for breast tumor growth and metastasis have not been explored. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate aggressive tumor growth and metastasis may address an unmet medical necessity for invasive breast cancer.

Sustained inflammation is one of the major hallmarks of breast carcinogenesis [9]. Cytosolic phospholipase A2α (cPLA2) plays an important role in driving inflammation-associated cancer [10,11,12,13,14,15]. In addition, it contributes to the biosynthesis of inflammatory lipids such as Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). PGE2 promotes the recruitment of different immune suppressive cells including macrophages in the TME [16]. Macrophages can be classified into two potential subtypes M1 and M2, where M2 exhibits pro-tumor functions [17, 18]. PGE2 was reported to affect the polarization of macrophages in different human malignancies [16, 19]. Recently, a chemical inhibitor against cPLA2 has been proven very effective against aberrant angiogenesis in basal-like invasive breast cancer [20]. S100A7 is highly expressed in psoriasis and cPLA2 inhibitors are considered as potent anti-psoriasis agents [21, 22]. Surprisingly, psoriasis predisposes patients to develop cancer [23,24,25]. However, the crosstalk between S100A7 and cPLA2 in regulating aggressive breast cancer growth and metastasis and its downstream effects in iTME are not known.

In the present study, we performed an in-depth analysis of S100A7 and cPLA2 in breast cancer progression and metastasis using multiple breast cancer cell lines and patient samples. We further exploited different preclinical mouse models including mS100a7a15-overexpressing bi-transgenic and humanized patient-derived xenograft (Hu-PDX) mouse models to analyze the pharmacological inhibition of cPLA2 in attenuating S100A7-induced pro-tumor effects. Our results reveal that higher co-expression of S100A7 and cPLA2 aggravate breast tumor growth and distant metastasis by enhancing the iTME and correlates with worse recurrence-free survival. Altogether, this study identifies S1007/cPLA2 signaling as a promising target against metastatic breast cancers and demonstrates the efficacy of pharmacological inhibition of cPLA2 to improve the clinical outcome of S100A7-overexpressing breast cancer patients.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and other reagents

Human breast carcinoma cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 were obtained from ATCC. MVT-1 cells (derived from MMTV-c-Myc; MMTV-VEGF bi-transgenic mice) were obtained from Dr. Johnson. MVT-1 cells were cultured as described [5, 26]. MDA-MB-231 cell lines were transfected with pIRES2-EGFP-hS100A7 or pIRES-2-EGFP using Lipofectamine-2000 reagent as per manufacturer’s instructions and stable S100A7 overexpressing clones were generated using G418 selection (500 mg/mL). Stable S100A7-downregulated MDA-MB-468 cells and PLKO.1-puro vector control cells were cultured as described [2]. BMDM were also isolated from wild-type 6-weeks-old female mice and differentiated into macrophages as described [27]. Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium, fetal bovine serum, penicillin and streptomycin antibiotics, trypsin, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid were obtained from Gibco BRL (Grand Island, NY, USA). RAGE Antagonist (FPS-ZM1) and recombinant S100A7 were purchased from Calbiochem and Novus Biologicals respectively.

Mouse models

The NSG (NOD scid gamma mouse) mice were obtained from the OSU animal core facility. TetO-mS100a7a15 mice were kindly provided by Dr. Yuspa (NIH). TetO-mS100a7a15 mice [21] were cross-bred with MMTV-rtTA mice to generate bi-transgenic MMTV-mS100a7a15 mice. Transgenic littermates were genotyped by PCR. Female MMTV-mS100a7a15 mice were fed with Dox-chow 1 g/kg (Bio-Serv), and mice with a normal diet served as controls. FVB-Tg(C3-1-TAg)cJeg/JegJ mice (Stock No:013591) were purchased from Jackson laboratory. The metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft (TM00096) was purchased from Jackson Lab and the humanized-PDX mouse model was developed as described previously [28, 29]. All mice were kept in The OSU’s animal facility in compliance with the guidelines and protocols approved by the OSU-IACUC. MVT-1 cells (1X105) were injected into the mammary glands of mS100a7a15 overexpression bi-transgenic mice. Transgenic mice injected with MVT-1 cells were fed either with Dox-chow 1 g/kg (Tet-on) or a normal diet (Tet-off). Tumors were measured weekly with external calipers and volume was calculated as described earlier and animals were sacrificed and tumors were excised [5].

Flow cytometry

Freshly prepared single-cell suspensions were incubated with an Fc receptor blocker followed by staining with different fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies as described in Supplementary Table-1 [5]. After staining, cells were analyzed by FACS Fortessa using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot analysis was performed using FlowJo v10 software as described previously [30].

Data mining and computational analysis

The Caldas (2007) [31] and Chin (2006) [32] datasets were obtained via the Xena Browser [33] and imported into the R version 3.5.3. Heat maps of gene expression compared to staging, size, and grade were developed using heatmap R package version 1.0.12 with expression values converted to ranks for improved visualization. The effect of S100A7 and cPLA2 mRNA expressions level on the OS probability in IM subtype of breast cancer patients was analyzed and the Kaplan-Meier plots were generated by the Kaplan-Meier Plotter [34]. The differential expression and correlation of S100A7 and cPLA2 were also analyzed by using different databases that include gene expression database of normal and tumor tissues version 2 (GENT2) and Search-Based Exploration of Expression Compendium (SEEK) databases. GENT2 provided a user-friendly gene expression search platform for analyzing the differential gene expression patterns across different normal and tumor tissues assembled from public gene expression data sets [35], while SEEK is a computational gene co-expression search engine.

Immunoblotting and small interfering RNAs

Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting as described earlier [36,37,38]. cPLA2 specific siRNA was purchased from Dharmacon and knockdown was achieved as described earlier [39].

Immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence (IF), and ELISA

IHC and IF on formalin-fixed sections were performed as described earlier [40]. Antibodies used are mentioned in Supplementary Table-1. The staining of TMAs was graded as previously described [38]. Human S100A7 and PGE2 ELISA kits were purchased from the MyBioSource and Novus Biologicals respectively and the assay was performed as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasma samples were stored at − 80 °C until analysis and processed for downstream study as described earlier [41].

Cancer patient data analysis

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) for invasive breast cancer (BR1002b) were obtained commercially from US Biomax, Inc. (Rockville, MD). The clinicopathological detail of this TMA was provided in Supplementary Table-2. Normal and breast cancer patients’ frozen blood plasma samples were procured from TCC-OSUCCC after getting Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval (2019C0021). IHC profiler software was used to analyze the expression of different proteins. The infiltration of CD163+ M2-TAMs was analyzed by using ImageScope software. Non-parametric tests were performed to calculate the p values. Spearman rho’s correlation was also performed to calculate the correlation between different protein expressions and infiltration of CD163+ M2-TAMs.

Statistical analysis

For continuous variables, two-sample t-tests were used if two groups were compared, and One-way ANOVA was used when more than two groups were compared. Non-parametric tests were also used to calculate the p values for comparing the clinical data of more than two groups. Spearman’s rho correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation coefficient and p values. For the TCGA dataset using the Oncomine database, ****P < 0.0001 cut-off value was used for calculating statistical significance as described earlier [42, 43]. * indicates P < 0.05; ** indicates P < 0.01; *** indicates P < 0.001; **** indicates P < 0.0001; ns is non-significant.

Results

High co-expression of S100A7 and cPLA2 correlates with poor prognosis

Firstly, we analyzed the clinical significance of S100A7 and cPLA2 (PLA2G4A) in invasive breast cancer using publically available breast cancer datasets and human breast cancer tissue microarray (TMAs) by immunohistochemistry analysis. We discovered a significantly higher level of S100A7 and cPLA2 proteins in tumor tissues compared to normal breast tissues (Fig. 1A & D). We also observed significantly higher expression of both S100A7 and cPLA2 proteins in high-grade malignant breast tumors compared to the low-grade and normal tissues (Supplementary Fig. 1A-C). Next, we evaluated the relative mRNA expression of S100A7 and cPLA2 in low and high-grade breast tumor tissues using different publically available clinical datasets. Using the GENT2 database, we observed that higher-grade invasive breast tumors show increased expression of S100A7 and PLA2G4A compared to low-grade tumors (Fig. 1B & E). Further, we evaluated these results in independent cohorts of breast cancer patients. For this, we analyzed the differential expression of S100A7 and cPLA2 genes across different stages, grades, and tumor sizes of breast cancer patients using publically available Caldas and Chin datasets (Supplementary Fig. 1D). In agreement with our previous results, we observed that S100A7 and PLA2G4A revealed significantly higher expression in high-grade tumors compared to low-grade breast tumor tissues (Fig. 1C & F). Next, we evaluated the correlation between S100A7 and cPLA2 at the protein level using the same breast cancer patient samples. Interestingly, we found a significant positive correlation (Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient = 0.544) between S100A7 and cPLA2 (Fig. 1G). We further tested the correlation between S100A7 and PLA2G4A gene expression in breast cancer patients using the SEEK database (Search-Based Exploration of Expression Compendium). We observed a significant positive correlation between S100A7 and PLA2G4A in distinct signal transduction pathways (r = 0.93) and among different breast tumor samples from pre-and post-chemotherapy (r = 0.59) (Fig. 1H). Furthermore, we analyzed the correlation of S100A7 and PLA2G4A using the cBioPortal for cancer genomics database, which contains a large number of breast cancer samples of different subtypes. We discovered that S100A7 showed a significant positive correlation with PLA2G4A in breast cancer patients, mainly in breast invasive carcinoma (Supplementary Fig. 1E). We also evaluated the prognostic significance of S100A7 and PLA2G4A alone or in combination and overall survival (OS) probability of immunomodulatory (IM) subtype of breast cancer patients using the Kaplan Meier (KM)-plotter [Breast cancer] tool (gene chip). The KM plotter analysis revealed that alone or combined higher expression of both these genes had high hazard ratios and poor OS probability among the IM subtype of breast cancer subjects (Fig. 1I-K). Interestingly, we sought to analyze the clinical significance of S100A7 and cPLA2 in relapse-free survival at 5 years in breast cancer patients treated with any chemotherapy using the ROC (receiver operating characteristics) plotter database. ROC plotter database is capable to link gene expression and response to therapy using transcriptome-level data [44]. We discovered that S100A7 and cPLA2 showed significantly decreased expression in responder cohorts as compared to non-responder breast cancer patients with the area under curve (AUC) values of 0.571 (205916_at; Mann-Whitney test p-value:0.0076) and 0.555 (210145_at; Mann-Whitney test p-value:0.037) respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2A & B). Finally, we also evaluated the differential expression of these two genes in normal and different hormonal subtypes of breast cancer patients using TISIDB and Oncomine databases. We observed that only the basal subtype of breast cancer showed significantly high levels of S100A7 (p-value = 1.81e-22) and PLA2G4A (p-value = 1.45e-54) as compared to normal subjects (Supplementary Fig. 2C & D). Interestingly, the expression of both these genes was significantly high specifically in the TNBC subtype compared to another molecular status (Supplementary Fig. 2E & F). TNBC is frequently used as a surrogate for classifying the invasive basal breast cancer subtype and basal-like TNBC has been reported to be associated with poor clinical outcomes. Taken together, these findings suggest that S100A7 and cPLA2 are highly expressed and positively correlated with high-grade breast tumors. In addition, the coexpression of S100A7 and cPLA2 with poor overall survival for breast cancer patients, especially in aggressive IM and basal-like TNBC.

Fig. 1
figure 1

High co-expression of S100A7 and cPLA2 (PLA2G4A) is associated with poor clinical prognosis in breast cancer. Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) images of (A). S100A7 and (D). cPLA2 proteins in malignant breast tumor samples (n = 36) and normal tissues (n = 46) [source: US Biomax]. Percent high-positive cells were quantified (right). Non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U test) was applied. Relative mRNA expression (log2 fold change) of S100A7 and cPLA2 (PLA2G4A) were analyzed in low (n = 82) and high grades (n = 450) of breast tumor tissues using (B & E). GENT2 database (http://gent2.appex.kr/gent2/) and (C & F). also in low (n = 39) and high (n = 183) grades of breast cancer samples using Caldas & Chin datasets (n = 222). t test was used to calculate the p values (G). Correlation analysis between S100A7 and cPLA2 protein levels (% high positive) in a tumor tissue microarray (TMAs) of malignant breast cancer patients (n = 74) (H). Heatmap showing the correlation of S100A7 and cPLA2 in distinct signal transduction pathways (correlation coefficient = 0.93; NCBI GEO dataset: GSE39965) and expression in breast tumor tissues of pre-and post-chemotherapy (correlation coefficient = 0.59; NCBI GEO dataset: GSE18728). The pre and post chemotherapy analysis of baseline gene expression comprised baseline samples from 28 breast cancer patients which include17 non-responders and 11 responders. Analyses of gene expression changes involved paired baseline and post-cycle one specimens from 14 patients; of these 8 patients were non-responders and 6 patients were responders. (source: SEEK database). KM-plotter survival analysis (gene chip) of (I). S100A7 (PSOR1) alone, (J). cPLA2 (PLA2G4A) alone and (K). Combined S100A7 and cPLA2 (analysis include only patients with high median expression of genes) mRNAs expression with overall survival (OS) probability of immunomodulatory (IM) subtype of breast cancer patients. ns: non-significant, *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001. scale bar: 300 μm

Full size image

cPLA2 inhibition attenuates PGE2 production in breast cancer cells

To further interrogate the correlation and determine the role of S100A7 in regulating cPLA2 expression and its downstream signaling, S100A7 overexpressing/downregulated breast cancer cells were analyzed. For this study, we first analyzed the expression of S100A7 in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cell lines and we observed that S100A7 is only expressed in MDA-MB-468 cells at basal condition (Supplementary Fig. 2G.). Therefore, we downregulated S100A7 in an MDA-MB-468 cell line, while we overexpressed S100A7 in MDA-MB-231 cells. We observed that S100A7 overexpression enhances cPLA2 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 2A), whereas S100A7 downregulation reduced the cPLA2 expression in MDA-MB-468 cells (Fig. 2B). In our previous study, we have shown that S100A7 mediates its effect by directly binding to the RAGE receptor in breast cancer cells [45]. In this study, we observed that exogenous supplementation of hS100A7 recombinant protein in S100A7 deficient MDA-MB-231 cells that express RAGE caused increased cPLA2 expression (Supplementary Fig. 2H). Therefore, we next tested the effect of RAGE inhibition on cPLA2 levels in S100A7 overexpressing MDA-MB-231 cells. The pharmacological inhibition of RAGE, using the FPS-ZM1 inhibitor, showed a dose-dependent reduction of cPLA2 expression in S100A7 overexpressing MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2
figure 2

S100A7 regulates cPLA2-mediated PGE2 generation in breast cancer. Immunoblot analysis of S100A7 and cPLA2 proteins in (A). MDA-MB-231 vector (231 V) and S100A7 overexpression (S7OE-231) cells (B). MDA-MB-468 vector (468 V) and S100A7 knockdown (S7KD-468) cells (C). Immunoblot analysis of cPLA2 in S7OE-231 cells treated with vehicle control (DMSO) or RAGE inhibitor (FPS-ZM1) for 24 h. The bar diagram showing the levels of PGE2 (pg/mL) in conditioned medium (CM) harvested from (D). 231 V and S7OE-231 cells, and (E). 468 V and S7KD-468 either treated with vehicle control (VC) or AACOCF3 (AF3). Analysis of PGE2 (pg/mL) in CM of (F) S100A7-overexpressing and (G). MDA-MB-468 cells transiently transfected with scramble control (Scr) or PLA2G4A-siRNA. Estimation of (H). S100A7 (ng/mL) and (I). PGE2 (pg/mL) in blood plasma samples of normal subjects (n = 18) and breast cancer patients (n = 62) (J). Correlation between blood plasma level of S100A7 (ng/ml) and PGE2 (pg/ml) in breast cancer patients (n = 70). ns: non-significant, *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001. t test and one way ANOVA was used for calculating statistical significance

Full size image

Next, we explored the downstream mechanistic pathway regulated by the S100A7/cPLA2 axis in metastatic breast cancer cells. We observed that S100A7 overexpression significantly increases PGE2 levels, while the treatment of cPLA2 inhibitor (AACOCF3) led to reduced PGE2 secretion in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 2D). In addition, the S100A7 knockdown reduced PGE2 generation that was not further significantly reduced by AACOCF3 in MDA-MB-468 cells (Fig. 2E). We also discovered that cPLA2 knockdown in S100A7 expressing breast cancer cells significantly reduced the PGE2 level (Fig. 2F & G) (Supplementary Fig. 2I & J). To further determine the clinical significance of S100A7 in regulating the PGE2 titer in breast cancer patients, we analyzed the titer of S100A7 and PGE2 and their correlation in breast cancer plasma samples. We discovered that the level of both S100A7/PGE2 was significantly higher in breast cancer patients as compared to normal subjects (Fig. 2H & I). We also observed a significant positive correlation (Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient = 0.4) between circulating S100A7 and blood PGE2 in breast cancer patients (Fig. 2J). Overall, our data suggest that cPLA2 inhibition suppressed S100A7-induced PGE2 generation by breast cancer cells.

cPLA2 inhibition decreases S100A7-induced tumor burden in orthotopic and spontaneous breast cancer mouse models

To evaluate the preclinical significance of cPLA2 inhibition in S100A7-overexpressing mammary tumors, we assayed the inhibitory effect of AACOCF3 on orthotopic and spontaneous breast cancer mouse models. mS100a7a15 is a paralog of human S100A7, and we have generated a doxycycline (DOX)-inducible bi-transgenic MMTV-mS100a7a15 mouse model [5]. These mice overexpress mS100a7a15 in the mammary glands in presence of DOX. For this study, we injected MVT-1 cells in the mammary fat pad of these mice and after the formation of palpable tumors, we divided these mice into 4 different experimental groups: (a) without DOX (normal diet) with vehicle control (Tet-off-VC), (b) without DOX (normal diet) with AACOCF3 (Tet-off-AF3), (c) DOX diet with vehicle control (Tet-on-VC), and (d) DOX diet with AACOCF3 (Tet-on-AF3) (Fig. 3A). Surprisingly, only mice overexpressing mS100a7a15 respond to cPLA2 inhibitor and showed significantly decreased tumor burden after the treatment of AACOCF3 compared to control animals (Fig. 3B-D). Increased expression of mS100a7a15 was confirmed by immunofluorescence assay in MVT-1 tumors under DOX diet (Tet-on) than mice on a normal diet (Tet-off) (Supplementary Fig. 3A). Visceral organ analysis revealed that cPLA2 inhibition significantly reduced lung and liver metastases, preferentially in Tet-on-AF3 group (Fig. 3E) (Supplementary Fig. 3B). Importantly, we also observed that cPLA2 inhibition more drastically reduced the size and weight of the spleen from Tet-on (mS100a7a15-high) group compared to the Tet-off group (Supplementary Fig. 3C). The spleen plays an essential role in neoplastic growth by serving as a reservoir of many biological factors during the different stages of tumor growth [46] and has been reported as an essential extramedullary site that can unceasingly support tumor growth by increasing the infiltration of immunosuppressive myeloid cells into the tumor [47].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Inhibition of cPLA2 reduces S100A7-enhanced breast tumor growth and metastasis in MMTV-rtTA;TetO-mS100a7a15 bi-transgenic mice model (A). Schematic representation showing the generation and treatment of the doxycycline (DOX) inducible mS100a7a15 bi-transgenic (Tet-O, tet operator) MVT1 tumor-bearing mouse model. In brief, 1X105 MVT1 cells into the 4th mammary gland (MG) of the bi-transgenic mice. Mice were fed with either 1 g/kg.bt. doxycycline diet (Tet-on; n = 8) or normal diet (Tet-off; n = 8). After the onset of palpable tumors, each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n = 4 each) and were treated with VC or AF3 (5 mg/kg.bt) intraperitoneal (i.p.) twice a week for 3 weeks. Tumor volume was measured once a week in these mice. After 21 days, the tumors were harvested from these mice and weighed (B). Representative photographs of tumors dissected from different experimental groups (C). Graph showing the tumor volume (mm3) and (D). tumor weight (gm) of each experimental group treated with VC and AF3 (E). Representative image of H&E staining of metastatic nodules in the liver (top) and lung (bottom) of VC and AF3 treated mice. Bar diagram represents the means ±SEMs of four replicates (F). Representative image showing the tumors harvested from Tet-off (normal diet) and Tet-on (DOX diet) groups with MMTV-rtTA;TetO-mS100a7a15-C3-TAG genotype. Graph showing the (G). the total number of tumors, (H). tumor weight (gm) (I). total tumor volume (mm3) and (J). the number of lung nodules in Tet-off and Tet-on groups (K). Schematic approach showing the treatment of spontaneous breast cancer model of mS100a7a15 overexpressing (MMTV-rtTA;TetO-mS100a7a15-C3-TAG) mice. MMTV-rtTA;TetO-mS100a7a15-C3-TAG female mice (6 weeks old) were fed with DOX diet (Tet-on) and after the onset of palpable tumors, mice were either treated with VC or AF3 (5 mg/kg.bt) intraperitoneal (i.p.) twice in a week for 8 weeks. Tumor volumes were measured externally by using Vernier caliper. At the endpoint, mice were sacrificed and tumors and other organs were harvested for downstream analysis (L). Photomicrographs of tumors harvested from Tet-on mice treated with VC or AF3. Graph showing the (M). tumor weight (gm), (N). the total number of tumors, (O). total tumor volume (mm3) and (P). Spleen weight (gm) and (Q). the number of lung nodules in Tet-off and Tet-on groups. The graphs indicate the means ±SEMs of four replicates. ns: non-significant, *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. t test and one way ANOVA was used for calculating statistical significance

Full size image

We also investigated the inhibitory potential of AACOCF3 on a spontaneous C3(1)/SV40 T/t-antigen transgenic mouse model of human triple-negative breast cancer [48]. We cross-bred MMTV-rtTA;TetO-mS100a7a15 mouse with C3(1)-TAg,C3(1)/Tag (C3-Tag) mouse and animals with C3-Tag;MMTV-rtTA;TetO-mS100a7a15 genotypes were maintained in presence or absence of DOX diet for eight weeks. Mice fed with the DOX diet showed significantly higher tumor burden and pulmonary metastasis compared to mice on a normal diet (Fig. 3F-J). Next, we evaluated the anti-tumor effect of AACOCF3 treatment on C3-Tag;MMTV-rtTA;TetO-mS100a7a15 mice fed with DOX diet. We found that AACOCF3 treatment significantly reduced S100A7 enhanced tumor burden and lung metastasis (Fig. 3K-Q). Altogether, our in-vivo studies suggest that cPLA2 inhibition tends to be a promising strategy against S100A7 overexpressing metastatic mammary tumors.

S100A7/cPLA2/PGE2 signaling enhances immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment

Breast cancer iTME constituents possess the ability to reprogram tumor growth and distant metastasis; hence, a better understanding of the iTME would help in designing effective approaches for efficient targeting of S100A7-overexpressing metastatic breast cancers. Hence, we evaluated the functional significance of cPLA2 inhibition in regulating the recruitment of different myeloid cells for generating an iTME. We demonstrated that high expression of the cPLA2 gene positively correlated with the increased abundance of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in invasive breast tumor tissues (Supplementary Fig. 4A-B).

PGE2 has been reported to play an important role in the generation of an iTME by modulating immunosuppressive myeloid cells (TAMs and MDSCs) in different human malignancies [16]. Here, we investigated the role of the S100A7/cPLA2/PGE2 axis in affecting bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) migration and plasticity by using cPLA2 and EP4 (PGE2 receptor) inhibitors. We observed that S100A7 overexpression significantly increased the migratory potential of BMDMs and treatment of cPLA2 inhibitor (AACOCF3) or EP4 inhibitor (L-161,982) drastically reduced the S100A7/PGE2-induced migration of BMDMs (Fig. 4 AC) (Supplementary Fig. 4C & D). Furthermore, BMDMs were treated with EP4 inhibitor or incubated with conditioned media of AACOCF3 treated S100A7 expressing breast cancer cells. We observed a decreased differentiation of BMDMs into CD206+MHC-IIlow M2-like macrophages in presence of cPLA2 or EP4 inhibition (Fig. 4D) (Supplementary Fig. 4E).

Fig. 4
figure 4

S100A7/cPLA2 signaling enhances the infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) through increased secretion of PGE2 (A). Schematic representation showing the treatment of conditioned media (CM) derived from MDA-MB-231 vector (231 V) and S100A7 overexpressing cells (S7OE-231) in presence or absence of PGE2 receptor, EP4 inhibitor on migration of bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs). Bar diagram shows the number of migrated BMDMs per field stimulated with CM derived from (B). 231 V and S7OE-231, (C). MVT1 cells treated with VC or AF3 or BMDMs preincubated with EP4 receptor antagonist (5 μM L161,982) for 2 h before stimulation with CM of MVT1 cells. Overnight migration using transwell inserts was performed. The bars indicate the means ± SEMs of 3 replicates (D). Flow cytometric analysis of MHC-II and CD206 in BMDMs cultured in CM of 231 V and S7OE-231 cells or BMDM preincubated with EP4 receptor antagonist (5 μM L161,982) for 2 h before stimulation with CM of S7OE-231 cells (E). Quantitative analysis of blood PGE2 (pg/mL) in MVT1 tumor-bearing Tet-off (normal diet) and Tet-on (DOX diet) mice treated with VC or AACOCF3 (AF3) (F). CD11b+F4/80+ TAMs (out of CD45+ cells) in tumors harvested from MVT1 tumor-bearing Tet-off (normal diet) and Tet-on (DOX diet) mice treated with VC or AF3 (G). The bar diagram indicates the means ±SEMs of three replicates (H). Representative IHC images of CD163+ M2-TAMs in adjacent normal, low-grade, and high-grade invasive breast cancer specimens (source: Biomax) (I). Box plot showing the percentage (%) of CD163+ M2-TAMs in normal, low-grade, and high-grade invasive breast cancer specimens. Non-parametric test (Independent-Samples Median Test) for comparing high grade to low grade and adjacent normal specimens of breast cancer patients. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple tests. Spearman rho’s correlation coefficient analysis between abundance of CD163+ M2-TAMs with protein levels (% high positive) of (J). S100A7 and (K). cPLA2 in TMAs of breast cancer patients (n = 70) (source: Biomax) (L). Spearman rho’s correlation coefficient analysis of cPLA2 mRNA (PLA2G4A) expression with infiltration of M2-TAMs in breast cancer patients (source: TIMER2.0; http://timer.cistrome.org/). ns: non-significant, *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. One way ANOVA was used for multiple group comparisons

Full size image

Consistent with our in-vitro observations, we found that AACOCF3 significantly reduced blood PGE2 levels as well as the abundance of TAMs in the tumor and spleen of tumor-bearing S100A7-overexpressing mice (Fig. 4E-G) (Supplementary Fig. 5A-C). To further analyze the clinical impact of S100A7/cPLA2 signaling in modulating the host immunosuppressive response, we investigated the correlation of these two proteins with the abundance of tumor-promoting CD163+ M2-TAMs using TMAs of invasive breast cancer patients. Similar to our previous results, we discovered that different grades of malignant breast tumors revealed a significantly increased abundance of CD163+ M2-TAMs compared to normal breast tissues (Fig. 4H & I) and also revealed a significant positive correlation with increased expression of S100A7 and cPLA2 proteins (Fig. 4J & K). Moreover, cPLA2 gene expression is also significantly positively correlated with CD163+ M2-TAMs in breast cancer patients (Fig. 4L). Additionally, KM plotter analysis also indicates that high expression of S100A7 with enriched macrophage population significantly associated with poor RFS probability for breast cancer patients, while high S100A7 expression with decreased macrophage showed non-significant clinical outcome (Supplementary Fig. 5D).

We also investigated the effect of cPLA2 inhibition on S100A7-mediated recruitment of MDSCs using our mS100a7a15 overexpressing mice. Interestingly, only tumor-bearing mS100a7a15-overexpressing bi-transgenic mice responded to cPLA2 inhibitor and showed reduced recruitment of MDSCs both in spleen and tumors (Fig. 5A-F). Different subsets of MDSCs promote the development of tumors and metastasis [49]. We observed that the cPLA2 inhibitor selectively reduced the abundance of granulocytic Ly6G+ MDSCs in the spleen of mS100a7a15-overexpressing mice (Supplementary Fig. 6A-D). In brief, these results suggest that the S100A7/cPLA2/PGE2 signaling cascade generates an iTME through modulating the recruitment and plasticity of different immunosuppressive myeloid cells, especially TAMs in metastatic breast cancer, and therefore, disrupting this signaling mechanism may heighten the anti-tumor immune response.

Fig. 5
figure 5

cPLA2 inhibitor decreases S100A7-mediated recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in MMTV-rtTA;TetO-mS100a7a15 bi-transgenic mice model (A). Flow cytometric and (B). t-SNE plot analysis of CD11b+Gr-1+ MDSCs (out of CD45+) in spleens harvested from Tet-off and Tet-on mice treated with VC or AF3 (C). Bar diagram represents the means ±SEMs of three replicates (D). Flow cytometric and (E). t-SNE plot analysis of MDSCs in tumors harvested from Tet-off and Tet-on mice treated with VC or AF3 (F). Bar diagram represents the means ±SEMs of three replicates. ns: non-significant, *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. One way ANOVA was used for multiple group comparisons

Full size image

cPLA2 inhibition increases the infiltration of T lymphocytes in tumor

The anti-tumor effect of any chemotherapeutic drugs depends on two facets of cancer biology, first, the direct killing of tumor cells, and secondly is their ability to enhance the CD4+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)-mediated immune response [50, 51]. Therefore, in this study, we utilized CODEX multiplexed imaging technique, which helps us to explore the functional significance of targeting the S100A7/cPLA2 signaling axis on abundance, cell surface expression, and interactions of different subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ TILs by using our tumor-bearing MMTV-mS100a7a15, a bi-transgenic mouse model. CODEX is a recently developed highly multiplexed imaging technique that enables the analysis of more than 56 proteins in a single section of tissue through an iterative imaging process [52, 53]. Spatial interaction of host-tumor cells with immune cells and expression levels of different markers can be easily quantified using this multiplexed technique. Using known cell surface markers, this technique has proved to be particularly useful in profiling the precise immune cell populations in healthy and diseased tissues [52, 53]. As we discovered that cPLA2 inhibitor treatment was significantly effective only in the DOX-inducible mouse model of mS100a7a15, therefore in this study, we investigated the anti-tumor effect of AACOCF3 on immune response mediated through CD4+ and CD8+ TILs in mS100a7a15 overexpression group using CODEX.

CODEX was performed using validated antibodies for mouse tumor tissue samples (Fig. 6A) [53]. Since, in our study, CODEX was performed on FFPE breast tumor tissues, we focused our analysis and interpretations on those T cells markers, which showed positive signals in our samples. The in-depth quantitative and cluster analysis revealed that the AACOCF3 treatment increased the infiltration of proliferating (Ki-67+) and activated (CD11b/CD45R/CD38/CD90.2) CD4+ and CD8+ TILs in breast TME (Fig. 6B & C; Supplementary Fig. 7). CD11b, CD38, CD45R, and CD90.2 are murine cell surface markers known to be associated with the activated status of T cells [54,55,56,57,58,59]. We also analyzed the cell populations expressing CD4, CD8a, CD90.2, CD45R, CD38, CD11b, and Ki-67 using t-SNE plot analysis and we found that AACOCF3 treatment increased the number of CD4, CD8a, CD90.2, CD38, and CD11b positive cells (Fig. 6D). The anti-tumor activity of TILs depends on mutual direct or indirect interaction of different subsets of T cells [60,61,62], therefore we investigated the effect of cPLA2 inhibition on the interaction of proliferating and activated TILs. We presented the cell-cell interaction map in circus and heatmap plots and we observed that AACOCF3 treatment revealed the highest degree of interaction among the different subsets of proliferating and activated CD4+ and CD8+ TILs (Fig. 6E & F). Finally, we explored the association of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with cPLA2 (PLA2G4A) gene expression in invasive basal-like breast cancer patients using the TIMER database. Interestingly, we found that cPLA2 differential expression showed a significant negative correlation with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells infiltration (Fig. 6G). In brief, our results showed that the inhibition of S100A7/cPLA2 signaling could increase the infiltration of proliferating and activated CD4+ and CD8+ TILs in breast TME and may mount an enhanced anti-tumor immune response against aggressive metastatic breast cancer cells.

Fig. 6
figure 6

cPLA2 inhibitor increases the infiltration of proliferative activated CD4/CD8 tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) in TME of tumor bearing S100A7 overexpressing mice (A). Schematic diagram of CODEX workflow showing the different steps of FFPE TMAs staining (B). Seven-color image of FFPE TMA prepared from of orthotopic syngeneic breast cancer model of mS100a7a15 bi-transgenic mouse model and imaged using a 25 DNA-barcode conjugated antibodies panel. 7 colors show the following markers: red- CD8a, yellow- CD45R, cyan- CD11b, White- CD90.2, blue- CD4, magenta- CD38, and green- Ki67 (C). Heatmap showing the average strength of cell-type to cell-type interaction for different clusters of vehicle control (VC) and cPLA2 inhibitor (AF3) treated mS100a7a15 overexpression mouse model (D). t-SNE and heatmap showing the expression of different markers associated with proliferating and activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (E). Circos plot and, (F). heat map showing the cell interaction networks of different subsets of proliferating and activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in VC and AF3 treated groups. The thickness of interacting connection associates with the number of contacts, size of the node represents the number of cells per group. Scale bar in heat map showing the interaction strength of different connecting nodes (G). Spearman rho’s correlation coefficient analysis of cPLA2 mRNA (PLA2G4A) expression with infiltration level of CD4 and CD8 T cells in invasive basal-like breast cancer patients (source: TIMER2.0; http://timer.cistrome.org/)

Full size image

cPLA2 inhibition attenuates tumor progression in humanized PDX mouse model by decreasing tumor-infiltrating immunosuppressive cells

To determine if the S100A7/cPLA2 signaling axis could be exploited as a potential therapeutic target against metastatic breast cancer, we analyzed the clinical utility of cPLA2 inhibitor against breast tumor growth and metastasis using the Hu-PDX mouse model. Hu-PDX breast cancer mouse models are emerging tools for evaluating the efficacy of novel drugs as well as immunotherapies on tumor growth, immune response, metastasis as they recapitulate the histological characteristics of the original tumors. First, we confirmed the expression of both S100A7 and cPLA2 in tumor lysate from the PDX specimen (Fig. 7A). We assessed the anti-tumor activity of AACOCF3 by using the Hu-PDX model (Fig. 7B) and found that AACOCF3 treatment significantly reduced tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis (Fig. 7C-F). We further explored the effect of cPLA2 inhibition on the immunosuppressive immune landscape of breast TME and observed that AACOCF3 treatment significantly reduced the recruitment of total TAMs and M2-TAMs (Fig. 7G & H). Interestingly, no significant change in the infiltration of CD8+ T cells while reduced infiltration of CD4+ T cells was detected (Supplementary Fig. 8A). Further, we analyzed the status of CD4+ T cells to predict the status of an adaptive anti-tumor immune response. We observed an increased CTLA-4 expression on CD4+ T cells in the control groups, which limits CD4+ T cell proliferation and its interaction with other immune cells. AACOCF3 treatment significantly reduced CTLA-4+ CD4+ T cells (Fig. 7I) while PD1+ CD4+ T cells were unaffected (Supplementary Fig. 8B). cPLA2 regulates the biosynthesis of PGE2 and PGE2 upregulates PD-L1 expression in different cell types [19, 63]. Therefore, we also analyzed the abundance of PD-L1+ tumor cells and found that AACOCF3 significantly decreased the expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells (Fig. 7J). Consequently, our preclinical data using Hu-PDX provide useful information for developing cPLA2 inhibitors against metastatic breast cancers.

Fig. 7
figure 7

cPLA2 inhibition obstructs tumor growth and metastasis in Hu-PDX mice model by attenuating immunosuppressive cells (A). Immunoblot analysis of S100A7 and cPLA2 proteins in tumor lysate of breast cancer patient derived-xenograft (PDX) specimen. GAPDH was used as a loading control (B). Schematic diagram showing the methodology for generation and treatment strategy of humanized PDX (Hu-PDX) breast cancer model (C). Representative image of tumors harvested from VC or AF3 (5 mg/kg.bt) treated Hu-PDX mice model. Graph showing the (D). tumor volume (mm3) and (E). Tumor weight (gm) of VC or AF3 treated PDX mice model (F). H/E image of lung nodules in lungs harvested from VC or AF3 treated Hu-PDX groups. The graphs indicate the means ±SEMs of four replicates. Flow cytometric analysis of % (G). total CD68+ TAMs (out of EpCAM−), (H). CD163+M2-TAMs (out of EpCAM−CD68+ macrophages) and (I). Exhausted CTLA+ CD4 T (out of EpCAM−CD14−CD3+CD4+) cells (J). PD-L1+ EpCAM+ tumor cells harvested from VC or AF3 treated Hu-PDX groups. The graphs indicate the means ±SEMs of three replicates. ns: non-significant, *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. t test was used for statistical significance

Full size image

Discussion

Distant metastasis is one of the major clinical hurdles for the successful therapies of invasive breast cancer. Given the worst clinical prognosis and lack of established molecular targets in metastatic breast cancer patients, there is an utmost need for a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms that enhance the metastatic potential of invasive breast cancer cells. This is important for developing better therapies for metastatic breast cancer patients, especially TNBC and basal like-breast cancer patients. S100A7-mediated signaling pathways promote inflammation, which contributes to aggressive breast tumor growth and metastasis [5, 45, 64,65,66]. Recent clinical data show that the copy number of the chromosomal region containing S100A genes, including S100A7, is amplified in cancer stem cells of TNBC and basal subtypes [67]. However, the S100A7-mediated downstream molecular mechanism which modulates iTME in metastatic breast cancer is not yet explored.

Here, we demonstrate that the S100A7/RAGE axis enhances cPLA2 expression in metastatic breast cancer cells (Fig. 8). Although S100A7 and cPLA2 individually are overexpressed in breast cancer [68, 69], no study has been performed to show their correlation in metastatic breast cancer. In our present study, Kaplan-Meier (KM) plotter analysis revealed that high co-expression of both S100A7 and cPLA2 correlates with decreased overall survival of breast cancer patients. In addition, we discovered that S100A7 expression strongly correlated with cPLA2 expression in metastatic breast cancer patients. We also observed that poorly differentiated high-grade breast tumors expressed a high level of both S100A7 and cPLA2 as compared to well-differentiated mammary tumors and their adjacent normal tissues. These studies indicate a positive correlation between S100A7 and cPLA2 in metastatic breast cancer patients and could be used as a potential prognostic marker for subsets of breast cancer patients.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Schematic diagram highlighting S100A7/cPLA2 signaling cascade and its effect on tumor growth and metastasis of invasive breast cancer through modulating the tumor microenvironment (TME)

Full size image

We discovered that S100A7 expression regulates the production of PGE2 in breast cancer cells. We further demonstrated that cPLA2 inhibition caused reduced production of PGE2 only in S100A7 expressing breast cancer cells. Interestingly, a positive correlation between S100A7 and PGE2 levels was observed in breast cancer patient samples. Malignant breast tumors contain high levels of PGE2 [70]. This is the first line of evidence, which indicates that S100A7 positively correlated with PGE2 and that could be used as potential circulating biomarkers in metastatic breast cancer.

In various pre-clinical mouse models including the S100A7 overexpression bi-transgenic and Hu-PDX mouse models, we showed that inhibition of S100A7/cPLA2 signaling by using small molecule inhibitor against cPLA2 significantly reduced tumor burden and metastasis. cPLA2 inhibitors have shown improved efficacy in phase I and II clinical trials against psoriasis [22]. Psoriatic skin has been shown to express a higher level of Psoriasin (S100A7) and is characterized by dense infiltration of macrophages [71, 72]. Our studies also revealed that S100A7 and cPLA2 are positively correlated with the infiltration of CD163+ M2-TAMs in invasive breast tumor tissues. KM plotter analysis also revealed high expression of S100A7 with enriched macrophage populations significantly associated with the poor recurrence-free survival (RFS) of breast cancer patients. In contrast, high S100A7 expression with decreased macrophage density does not predict the patient outcome. Here, we demonstrate that cPLA2 inhibition drastically decreased the infiltration of TAMs in a syngeneic mS100a7a15 overexpressing breast cancer mouse model. In human breast tumors, infiltrating TAMs, which represent up to 50% of the tumor mass, correlate with poor prognostic features, higher tumor grade [73], and decreased disease-free survival [74, 75]. Higher TAM density is typically associated with a higher vascular density, suggesting an angiogenic role of TAMs in human tumors [76]. In this study, we further showed that S100A7/cPLA2 signaling elevated the PGE2 generation that increased migration and polarization of macrophages towards M2-type through the EP4 receptor of BMDM. Interestingly, we also found that inhibition of S100A7/cPLA2 signaling reduced PGE2 level in S100A7 overexpressing pre-clinical breast cancer mouse model. PGE2 has been shown to generate the iTME in different human malignancies by modulating the behavior of different immune cells [16]. Notably, PGE2/EP4 has also been reported to increase the expression of PD-L1 on MDSCs and TAMs [19].

TME is an essential part of the solid tumor mass and is considered a promising therapeutic target [77]. The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the TME indicates mounting of an immune response against the tumor [78]. Recent studies have documented that CD4+ T cells are also effective at tumor rejection similar to CD8+ T cells [79, 80]. Therefore, we utilized a Hu-PDX mouse model to elucidate the effect of cPLA2 inhibition in modulating the tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes. We found that pharmacological inhibition of cPLA2 reduced breast tumor growth and metastasis with a decreased abundance of only CTLA4+ CD4+ T cells and M2-TAMs. In addition, it also decreased the density of PD-L1+ cancer cells to evoke immune evasive mechanisms that prevent CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity [81]. Moreover, CODEX analysis of orthotopic mouse mammary tumors demonstrated that inhibiting S100A7/cPLA2 signaling increased the abundance of proliferating as well as activated CD4+ and CD8+ TILs. Taken together, our study also highlights the potential of cPLA2 inhibitors in increasing the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to existing immunotherapeutic agents.

Conclusion

Our comprehensive studies using in-vitro assays, in-vivo mouse models, and patient samples showed that a novel cross-talk between S100A7 and cPLA2 enhances breast cancer growth and metastasis. We further showed that S100A7/cPLA2 signaling modulate TME by increasing the recruitment of immunosuppressive myeloid cells and reducing CD4+/CD8+ T cells. Our study provides usefulness in examining S100A7/cPLA2 expression as a potential prognostic marker for invasive and metastatic breast cancer patients. Furthermore, cPLA2 inhibitors could be used as a novel therapeutic drug for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients who harbor amplification or overexpression of the S100A7 gene. Overall, these studies have the potential to develop personalized therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary files.

Abbreviations

cPLA2:

Cytosolic phospholipase A2α

PGE2:

Prostaglandin E2

iTME:

Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment

TNBC:

Triple-negative breast cancer

CODEX:

CO-Detection by indEXing

RAGE:

Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products

NSG:

NOD scid gamma mouse

MMTV:

Mouse mammary tumor virus

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

TIL:

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

PD1:

Programmed cell death protein 1

PDL1:

Programmed death-ligand 1

CTLA4:

Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Associated Protein 4

TAM:

Tumor-associated macrophages

MDSC:

Myeloid-derived suppressor cell

BMDM:

Bone marrow-derived macrophages

KM:

Kaplan Meier

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristics

AUC:

Area under the curve

SEEK:

Search-Based Exploration of Expression Compendium

TMA:

Tissue microarray

HuPDX:

Humanized patient-derived xenograft

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

IF:

Immunofluorescence

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

OSU:

Ohio State University

References

  1. Wu Y, Zhou BP. Inflammation: a driving force speeds cancer metastasis. Cell Cycle. 2009;8(20):3267–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paruchuri V, Prasad A, McHugh K, Bhat HK, Polyak K, Ganju RK. S100A7-downregulation inhibits epidermal growth factor-induced signaling in breast cancer cells and blocks osteoclast formation. PLoS One. 2008;3(3):e1741.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu H, Wang L, Wang X, Cao Z, Yang Q, Zhang K. S100A7 enhances invasion of human breast cancer MDA-MB-468 cells through activation of nuclear factor-kappaB signaling. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Krop I, Marz A, Carlsson H, Li X, Bloushtain-Qimron N, Hu M, et al. A putative role for psoriasin in breast tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2005;65(24):11326–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nasser MW, Qamri Z, Deol YS, Ravi J, Powell CA, Trikha P, et al. S100A7 enhances mammary tumorigenesis through upregulation of inflammatory pathways. Cancer Res. 2012;72(3):604–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilkie T, Verma AK, Zhao H, Charan M, Ahirwar DK, Kant S, et al. Lipopolysaccharide from the commensal microbiota of the breast enhances cancer growth: role of S100A7 and TLR4. Mol Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12975.

  7. West NR, Watson PH. S100A7 (psoriasin) is induced by the proinflammatory cytokines oncostatin-M and interleukin-6 in human breast cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29(14):2083–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolf R, Howard OM, Dong HF, Voscopoulos C, Boeshans K, Winston J, et al. Chemotactic activity of S100A7 (Psoriasin) is mediated by the receptor for advanced glycation end products and potentiates inflammation with highly homologous but functionally distinct S100A15. J Immunol. 2008;181(2):1499–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suman S, Sharma PK, Rai G, Mishra S, Arora D, Gupta P, et al. Current perspectives of molecular pathways involved in chronic inflammation-mediated breast cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;472(3):401–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abbott MJ, Tang T, Sul HS. The role of phospholipase a(2)-derived mediators in obesity. Drug Discov Today Dis Mech. 2010;7(3-4):e213–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhardwaj P, Du B, Zhou XK, Sue E, Giri D, Harbus MD, et al. Estrogen protects against obesity-induced mammary gland inflammation in mice. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2015;8(8):751–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenhough A, Smartt HJ, Moore AE, Roberts HR, Williams AC, Paraskeva C, et al. The COX-2/PGE2 pathway: key roles in the hallmarks of cancer and adaptation to the tumour microenvironment. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(3):377–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang D, Fu L, Sun H, Guo L, DuBois RN. Prostaglandin E2 promotes colorectal Cancer stem cell expansion and metastasis in mice. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(7):1884–1895 e1884.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Loo TM, Kamachi F, Watanabe Y, Yoshimoto S, Kanda H, Arai Y, et al. Gut microbiota promotes obesity-associated liver Cancer through PGE2-mediated suppression of antitumor immunity. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(5):522–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Linkous A, Geng L, Lyshchik A, Hallahan DE, Yazlovitskaya EM. Cytosolic phospholipase A2: targeting cancer through the tumor vasculature. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(5):1635–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang D, DuBois RN. The role of prostaglandin E(2) in tumor-associated immunosuppression. Trends Mol Med. 2016;22(1):1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pollard JW. Tumour-educated macrophages promote tumour progression and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(1):71–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(3):787–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Prima V, Kaliberova LN, Kaliberov S, Curiel DT, Kusmartsev S. COX2/mPGES1/PGE2 pathway regulates PD-L1 expression in tumor-associated macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(5):1117–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim E, Tunset HM, Cebulla J, Vettukattil R, Helgesen H, Feuerherm AJ, et al. Anti-vascular effects of the cytosolic phospholipase A2 inhibitor AVX235 in a patient-derived basal-like breast cancer model. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolf R, Mascia F, Dharamsi A, Howard OM, Cataisson C, Bliskovski V, et al. Gene from a psoriasis susceptibility locus primes the skin for inflammation. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(61):61ra90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kokotou MG, Limnios D, Nikolaou A, Psarra A, Kokotos G. Inhibitors of phospholipase A2 and their therapeutic potential: an update on patents (2012-2016). Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2017;27(2):217–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaengebjerg S, Skov L, Egeberg A, Loft ND. Prevalence, incidence, and risk of Cancer in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(4):421–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Trafford AM, Parisi R, Kontopantelis E, Griffiths CEM, Ashcroft DM. Association of Psoriasis with the risk of developing or dying of Cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(12):1390–403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Fu Y, Lee CH, Chi CC. Association of Psoriasis with colorectal Cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(6):1429-1436.

  26. Wolford CC, McConoughey SJ, Jalgaonkar SP, Leon M, Merchant AS, Dominick JL, et al. Transcription factor ATF3 links host adaptive response to breast cancer metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(7):2893–906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gersuk GM, Razai LW, Marr KA. Methods of in vitro macrophage maturation confer variable inflammatory responses in association with altered expression of cell surface dectin-1. J Immunol Methods. 2008;329(1-2):157–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao Y, Shuen TWH, Toh TB, Chan XY, Liu M, Tan SY, et al. Development of a new patient-derived xenograft humanised mouse model to study human-specific tumour microenvironment and immunotherapy. Gut. 2018;67(10):1845–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang M, Yao LC, Cheng M, Cai D, Martinek J, Pan CX, et al. Humanized mice in studying efficacy and mechanisms of PD-1-targeted cancer immunotherapy. FASEB J. 2018;32(3):1537–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hosein AN, Huang H, Wang Z, Parmar K, Du W, Huang J, et al. Cellular heterogeneity during mouse pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression at single-cell resolution. JCI Insight. 2019;5(16):e129212.

  31. Naderi A, Teschendorff AE, Barbosa-Morais NL, Pinder SE, Green AR, Powe DG, et al. A gene-expression signature to predict survival in breast cancer across independent data sets. Oncogene. 2007;26(10):1507–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chin K, DeVries S, Fridlyand J, Spellman PT, Roydasgupta R, Kuo WL, et al. Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell. 2006;10(6):529–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldman MJ, Craft B, Hastie M, Repecka K, McDade F, Kamath A, et al. Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):675–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Nagy A, Lanczky A, Menyhart O, Gyorffy B. Validation of miRNA prognostic power in hepatocellular carcinoma using expression data of independent datasets. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9227.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Park SJ, Yoon BH, Kim SK, Kim SY. GENT2: an updated gene expression database for normal and tumor tissues. BMC Med Genet. 2019;12(Suppl 5):101.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Charan M, Das S, Mishra S, Chatterjee N, Varikuti S, Kaul K, et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor inhibition as a novel therapeutic approach against triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(9):774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Suman S, Basak T, Gupta P, Mishra S, Kumar V, Sengupta S, et al. Quantitative proteomics revealed novel proteins associated with molecular subtypes of breast cancer. J Proteome. 2016;148:183–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gupta P, Suman S, Mishra M, Mishra S, Srivastava N, Kumar V, et al. Autoantibodies against TYMS and PDLIM1 proteins detected as circulatory signatures in Indian breast cancer patients. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2016;10(5):564–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cam M, Charan M, Welker AM, Dravid P, Studebaker AW, Leonard JR, et al. DeltaNp73/ETS2 complex drives glioblastoma pathogenesis- targeting downstream mediators by rebastinib prolongs survival in preclinical models of glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2020;22(3):345–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Charan M, Dravid P, Cam M, Audino A, Gross AC, Arnold MA, et al. GD2-directed CAR-T cells in combination with HGF-targeted neutralizing antibody (AMG102) prevent primary tumor growth and metastasis in Ewing sarcoma. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(11):3184–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mishra S, Srivastava AK, Suman S, Kumar V, Shukla Y. Circulating miRNAs revealed as surrogate molecular signatures for the early detection of breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;369(1):67–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Curtis C, Shah SP, Chin SF, Turashvili G, Rueda OM, Dunning MJ, et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature. 2012;486(7403):346–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cancer genome atlas N: comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490(7418):61-70.

  44. Fekete JT, Gyorffy B. ROCplot.org: validating predictive biomarkers of chemotherapy/hormonal therapy/anti-HER2 therapy using transcriptomic data of 3,104 breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2019;145(11):3140–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nasser MW, Wani NA, Ahirwar DK, Powell CA, Ravi J, Elbaz M, et al. RAGE mediates S100A7-induced breast cancer growth and metastasis by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2015;75(6):974–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Yamagishi H, Oka T, Hashimoto I, Pellis NR, Kahan BD. The role of the spleen in tumor bearing host: I. characterization of spleen cells in tumor-bearing mice. Jpn J Surg. 1984;14(1):61–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cortez-Retamozo V, Etzrodt M, Newton A, Rauch PJ, Chudnovskiy A, Berger C, et al. Origins of tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(7):2491–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Hoenerhoff MJ, Shibata MA, Bode A, Green JE. Pathologic progression of mammary carcinomas in a C3(1)/SV40 T/t-antigen transgenic rat model of human triple-negative and Her2-positive breast cancer. Transgenic Res. 2011;20(2):247–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Youn JI, Nagaraj S, Collazo M, Gabrilovich DI. Subsets of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. J Immunol. 2008;181(8):5791–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bracci L, Schiavoni G, Sistigu A, Belardelli F. Immune-based mechanisms of cytotoxic chemotherapy: implications for the design of novel and rationale-based combined treatments against cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21(1):15–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zitvogel L, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Kroemer G. Immunological aspects of cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(1):59–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Goltsev Y, Samusik N, Kennedy-Darling J, Bhate S, Hale M, Vazquez G, et al. Deep profiling of mouse splenic architecture with CODEX multiplexed imaging. Cell. 2018;174(4):968–981 e915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Schurch CM, Bhate SS, Barlow GL, Phillips DJ, Noti L, Zlobec I, et al. Coordinated Cellular Neighborhoods Orchestrate Antitumoral Immunity at the Colorectal Cancer Invasive Front. Cell. 2020;182(5):1341–1359 e1319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Haeryfar SM, Hoskin DW. Thy-1: more than a mouse pan-T cell marker. J Immunol. 2004;173(6):3581–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sandoval-Montes C, Santos-Argumedo L. CD38 is expressed selectively during the activation of a subset of mature T cells with reduced proliferation but improved potential to produce cytokines. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;77(4):513–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang YY, Zhou N, Liu HS, Gong XL, Zhu R, Li XY, et al. Circulating activated lymphocyte subsets as potential blood biomarkers of cancer progression. Cancer Med. 2020;9(14):5086–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Watanabe Y, Akaike T. Activation signal induces the expression of B cell-specific CD45R epitope (6B2) on murine T cells. Scand J Immunol. 1994;39(5):419–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Luqman M, Bottomly K. Activation requirements for CD4+ T cells differing in CD45R expression. J Immunol. 1992;149(7):2300–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. McFarland HI, Nahill SR, Maciaszek JW, Welsh RM. CD11b (mac-1): a marker for CD8+ cytotoxic T cell activation and memory in virus infection. J Immunol. 1992;149(4):1326–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ostroumov D, Fekete-Drimusz N, Saborowski M, Kuhnel F, Woller N. CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte interplay in controlling tumor growth. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(4):689–713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cardenas MA, Prokhnevska N, Kissick HT. Organized immune cell interactions within tumors sustain a productive T-cell response. Int Immunol. 2021;33(1):27–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ahmed KA, Wang L, Xiang J. A new dynamic model of three cell interactions for CTL responses. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1(8):1430–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Koundouros N, Karali E, Tripp A, Valle A, Inglese P, Perry NJS, et al. Metabolic fingerprinting links oncogenic PIK3CA with enhanced arachidonic acid-derived eicosanoids. Cell. 2020;181(7):1596–1611 e1527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhao H, Wilkie T, Deol Y, Sneh A, Ganju A, Basree M, et al. miR-29b defines the pro−/anti-proliferative effects of S100A7 in breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2015;14(1):11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Batycka-Baran A, Hattinger E, Zwicker S, Summer B, Zack Howard OM, Thomas P, et al. Leukocyte-derived koebnerisin (S100A15) and psoriasin (S100A7) are systemic mediators of inflammation in psoriasis. J Dermatol Sci. 2015;79(3):214–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Leon R, Murray JI, Cragg G, Farnell B, West NR, Pace TC, et al. Identification and characterization of binding sites on S100A7, a participant in cancer and inflammation pathways. Biochemistry. 2009;48(44):10591–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Goh JY, Feng M, Wang W, Oguz G, Yatim S, Lee PL, et al. Chromosome 1q21.3 amplification is a trackable biomarker and actionable target for breast cancer recurrence. Nat Med. 2017;23(11):1319–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Al-Haddad S, Zhang Z, Leygue E, Snell L, Huang A, Niu Y, et al. Psoriasin (S100A7) expression and invasive breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 1999;155(6):2057–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Chen L, Fu H, Luo Y, Chen L, Cheng R, Zhang N, et al. cPLA2alpha mediates TGF-beta-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer through PI3k/Akt signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(4):e2728.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Schrey MP, Patel KV. Prostaglandin E2 production and metabolism in human breast cancer cells and breast fibroblasts. Regulation by inflammatory mediators. Br J Cancer. 1995;72(6):1412–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Madsen P, Rasmussen HH, Leffers H, Honore B, Dejgaard K, Olsen E, et al. Molecular cloning, occurrence, and expression of a novel partially secreted protein "psoriasin" that is highly up-regulated in psoriatic skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1991;97(4):701–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Clark RA, Kupper TS. Misbehaving macrophages in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(8):2084–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Lee AH, Happerfield LC, Bobrow LG, Millis RR. Angiogenesis and inflammation in invasive carcinoma of the breast. J Clin Pathol. 1997;50(8):669–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Campbell MJ, Tonlaar NY, Garwood ER, Huo D, Moore DH, Khramtsov AI, et al. Proliferating macrophages associated with high grade, hormone receptor negative breast cancer and poor clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;128(3):703-711.

  75. Leek RD, Lewis CE, Whitehouse R, Greenall M, Clarke J, Harris AL. Association of macrophage infiltration with angiogenesis and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1996;56(20):4625–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Morita Y, Zhang R, Leslie M, Adhikari S, Hasan N, Chervoneva I, et al. Pathologic evaluation of tumor-associated macrophage density and vessel inflammation in invasive breast carcinomas. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(2):2111–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Zhong S, Jeong JH, Chen Z, Chen Z, Luo JL. Targeting tumor microenvironment by small-molecule inhibitors. Transl Oncol. 2020;13(1):57–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Disis ML, Stanton SE. Triple-negative breast cancer: immune modulation as the new treatment paradigm. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015;e25-30. https://doi.org/10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e25.

  79. Perez-Diez A, Joncker NT, Choi K, Chan WF, Anderson CC, Lantz O, et al. CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells. Blood. 2007;109(12):5346–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Egelston CA, Avalos C, Tu TY, Rosario A, Wang R, Solomon S, et al. Resident memory CD8+ T cells within cancer islands mediate survival in breast cancer patients. JCI Insight. 2019;4(19):e130000.

  81. Juneja VR, McGuire KA, Manguso RT, LaFleur MW, Collins N, Haining WN, et al. PD-L1 on tumor cells is sufficient for immune evasion in immunogenic tumors and inhibits CD8 T cell cytotoxicity. J Exp Med. 2017;214(4):895–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Christina Hopkins for assistance with immunohistochemistry. We also like to thank Charles River for providing a humanized mice model for our PDX study. We would like to acknowledge Dr. Reena Shakya and Target Validation Shared Resource (TVSR) for generating PDX and hu-PDX mice models. We also like to acknowledge OSUCCC for providing confocal and flow cytometry facilities.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from NIH (CA109527 and CA153490) and Department of Defense Breast Cancer Breakthrough Award (W81XWH1910088) and OSU-Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Pelotonia Idea award to RKG. SM, DKA, and KK were supported by Pelotonia Fellowship from the OSU CCC.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sanjay Mishra and Manish Charan contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Sanjay Mishra, Manish Charan, Rajni Kant Shukla, Swati Misri, Ajeet K. Verma, Dinesh K. Ahirwar, Kirti Kaul, Kunj Vyas & Ramesh K. Ganju

  2. Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Sanjay Mishra, Manish Charan, Swati Misri, Ajeet K. Verma, Dinesh K. Ahirwar, Jalal Siddiqui, Kirti Kaul, Kunj Vyas, Wayne O. Miles, Jonathan W. Song & Ramesh K. Ganju

  3. Department of Microbial, Infection & Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Rajni Kant Shukla

  4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Pranay Agarwal, Neety Sahu & Nidhi Bhutani

  5. Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Jalal Siddiqui & Wayne O. Miles

  6. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Ayush Arpit Garg & Jonathan W. Song

  7. School of Medicine, Cell Science Imaging Facility, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Anum Khan

Authors
  1. Sanjay Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manish Charan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rajni Kant Shukla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pranay Agarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Swati Misri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ajeet K. Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dinesh K. Ahirwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jalal Siddiqui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kirti Kaul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Neety Sahu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kunj Vyas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ayush Arpit Garg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Anum Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Wayne O. Miles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jonathan W. Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Nidhi Bhutani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Ramesh K. Ganju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception, design, interpretation, and manuscript writing and revision: SM, MC, RKG. Data acquisition, statistical and computational analysis, and technical support: SM, MC, RKS, PA, SM, AV, DKA, JS, KK, NS, KV, AAG, AK, WOM, JWS, NB, RKG. Study supervision: RKG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sanjay Mishra or Ramesh K. Ganju.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were carried out in The Ohio State University’s (OSU) animal facility in compliance with the guidelines and protocols approved by the OSU-IACUC. Patient samples were collected on a tissue/blood-collection protocol approved by the OSU IRB.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

RKG serves as a consultant for Guidepoint consultation. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1

: List of reagents and resources.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 2

: Clinicopathological detail of Tissue microarray (BR1002b).

Additional file 3: Figure S1

. Expression and correlation of S100A7 and cPLA2 in breast cancer types. (A). Representative S100A7 and cPLA2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) images of invasive breast cancer specimens. [source: US Biomax]. Box plot showing percent (%) high positive (B). S100A7 and (C). cPLA2 stained cells in normal (n = 46), low-grade (n = 15), and high-grade (n = 21) breast cancer specimens. Non-parametric test (Independent-Samples Median Test) was used to calculate p values. (D). Heat map analysis showing the differential expression of S100A7 and PLA2G4A across different grades, size, and stages of breast cancer patients using Caldas (n = 113) & Chin; (n = 109) datasets. (E). Correlation analysis of S100A7 and PLA2G4A was analyzed in different breast cancer types (n = 3380) using cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. *P < 0.05*, *P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Additional file 4: Figure S2

. Effect of S100A7/cPLA2 gene expression on recurrence free survival of breast cancer patients. (A). ROC plotter analysis of S100A7 (205916_at; Mann-Whitney test p-value: 0.0076) and (B). cPLA2 (210145_at; Mann-Whitney test p-value: 0.037) for relapse free survival at 5 years after treatment with any chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. The graphs were plotted by using ROC plotter online database (http://www.rocplot.org/) with responder (n = 256) and non-responder (n = 220) breast cancer patients. Gene expression of (C). S100A7 and (D). PLA2G4A were analyzed in normal subjects (n = 137) and different breast cancer subtypes (Basal = 172; Her2 = 73, Luminal A = 508 and Luminal B = 191) using TISIDB database. (E). S100A7 (Reporter: A_23_P103310) and (F). PLA2G4A (Reporter: A_23_P11682) mRNA expressions were analyzed in triple negative (TNBC) and other biomarker status of invasive ductal breast carcinoma using TCGA breast cancer dataset of Oncomine database. [0 = no value or unidentified hormonal status (n = 297), 1 = HER2/ER/PR negative or TNBC (n = 46), 2 = other breast cancer biomarkers (n = 250)]. (G). Immunoblot analysis of S100A7 in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells. (H). Effect of recombinant human S100A7 treatment (100 ng/ml for 24 h) on cPLA2 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells. Immunoblot analysis of cPLA2 in (I). S7OE-231 and (J). MDA-MB-468 cells transiently transfected with control or cPLA2-siRNA.

Additional file 5: Figure S3

. Pharmacological inhibition of cPLA2 suppress the S100A7-mediated metastasis and gain in spleen weight in syngeneic orthotopic MMTV-rtTA;TetO-mS100a7a15 bi-transgenic mice model. (A). Immunofluorescence (IF) analysis of mS100a7a15 expression in tumor tissues harvested from MVT1 tumor-bearing mice fed with normal diet (Tet-off) or with doxycycline diet (Tet-on). (B). Representative images of livers (top) and lungs (bottom) harvested from Tet-off and Tet-on mice treated with VC or AF3. (C). Representative images of spleens harvested from Tet-off and Tet-on mice treated with vehicle control (VC) or 5 mg/kg.bt of AACOCF3 (AF3). Bar diagram represents the means of spleen weight (gm) ± SEMs of four replicates. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001. One way ANOVA was used for multiple group comparisons.

Additional file 6: Figure S4

. S100A7/cPLA2 signaling regulates the recruitment and plasticity of myeloid cells in breast cancer. Correlation analysis of (A). Macrophage and (B). Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) abundance with differential expression of cPLA2 (PLA2G4A) in invasive breast tumor tissues (source: TISIDB). Microscopic images showing the migrated bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) per field stimulated with CM derived from (C). 231 V and S7OE-231 cells or BMDM preincubated with EP4 receptor antagonist (5 μM L161,982) for 2 h before stimulation with CM of S7OE-231 cells. (D). MVT1 cells treated with VC or 20 μM AACOCF3 (AF3) or BMDM preincubated with EP4 receptor antagonist (5 μM L161,982) for 2 h before stimulation with CM of MVT1 cells. Cell migrations were performed overnight by using transwell migration plates. (E). Flow cytometric analysis of CD206 and MHCII in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) stimulated with conditioned media (CM) derived from MVT1 cells treated with VC or 20 μM AF3 or BMDM preincubated with EP4 receptor antagonist (5 μM L161,982) for 2 h before stimulation with CM of MVT1 cells.

Additional file 7: Figure S5

. cPLA2 inhibitor reduced the S100A7-mediated recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in breast cancer. Flow cytometric analysis of CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages (out of CD45+) in (A). tumors and (B). spleens harvested from MVT1 tumor-bearing mice fed with normal diet (Tet-off) or with doxycycline diet (Tet-on). Bar diagram represents the means ±SEMs of three replicates. (C). t-SNE plots showing the abundance of CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages in spleens harvested from Tet-off and Tet-on mice treated with VC or AACOCF3 (AF3). (D). KM-plotter survival analysis showed that increased expression of S100A7 mRNA with enriched macrophage correlates with a significantly poor overall survival probability of breast cancer patients (N = 547) whereas subjects (N = 386) with decreased macrophage infiltration showed insignificant change in survival probability. One way ANOVA was used for multiple group comparisons.

Additional file 8: Figure S6

. Effect of cPLA2 inhibitor on recruitment of monocytic (M-MDSCs) and polymorphonuclear (PMN-MDSCs) myeloid-derived suppressor cells in syngeneic orthotopic MMTV-rtTA;TetO-mS100a7a15 bi-transgenic mice model. (A). Flow cytometric and (B). t-SNE plot analysis of M-MDSCs (CD11b+Gr-1+ Ly6C+) and PMN-MDSCs (CD11b+Gr-1+ Ly6G+) in spleens harvested from Tet-off and Tet-on mice treated with VC or AF3. Bar diagram represents the means ±SEMs of three replicates. (C). Flow cytometric and (D). t-SNE plot analysis of M-MDSCs and PMN-MDSCs in tumors harvested from Tet-off and Tet-on mice treated with VC or AF3. Bar diagram represents the means ±SEMs of three replicates. ns: non-significant, *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. One way ANOVA was used for multiple group comparisons.

Additional file 9: Figure S7

. Supplementary figure related to Fig. 6 (CODEX). Microscopic overlapping multi-color images of FFPE TMAs prepared from of orthotopic syngeneic breast cancer model of mS100a7a15 bitransgenic mouse treated with vehicle control (VC) or cPLA2 inhibitor (AACOCF3). red- CD8a, yellow- CD45R, cyan- CD11b, White- CD90.2/DAPI, blue- CD4, magenta- CD38, and green- Ki67.

Additional file 10: Figure S8

. Effect of cPLA2 inhibitor on the infiltration of CD4+, CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and abundance of PD-L1+ tumor cells in Hu-PDX mouse model. Flow cytometric analysis of (A). CD4+ and CD8+ TILs (out of EpCAM−CD14−CD3+), (B). PD1+ CD4+ TILs harvested from Hu-PDX mice treated with 5 mg/kg.bt AACOCF3 (AF3) or vehicle control (VC). Bar diagram represents the means ±SEMs of three replicates. ns: non-significant, *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. t test was used for statistical significance.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, S., Charan, M., Shukla, R.K. et al. cPLA2 blockade attenuates S100A7-mediated breast tumorigenicity by inhibiting the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 41, 54 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02221-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02221-0

Keywords