Open Access

Association of MUTYH Gln324His and APEX1 Asp148Glu with colorectal cancer and smoking in a Japanese population

  • Mayumi Kasahara1,
  • Kayo Osawa1Email author,
  • Kana Yoshida2,
  • Aiko Miyaishi3,
  • Yasunori Osawa1,
  • Natsuko Inoue1,
  • Akimitsu Tsutou1,
  • Yoshiki Tabuchi4,
  • Kenichi Tanaka5,
  • Masahiro Yamamoto6,
  • Etsuji Shimada7 and
  • Juro Takahashi1
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research200827:49

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-49

Received: 19 June 2008

Accepted: 30 September 2008

Published: 30 September 2008

Abstract

Background

Genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair enzymes may lead to genetic instability and colorectal cancer carcinogenesis. Our objective was to measure the interactions between polymorphisms of repair genes and tobacco smoking in colorectal cancer.

Methods

The case-control study involved sixty-eight colorectal cancer patients and 121 non-cancer controls divided into non-smokers and smokers according to pack-years of smoking. The genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair enzymes,OGG1 Ser326Cys, MUTYH Gln324His, APEX1 Asp148Glu and XRCC1 Arg399Gln, were examined using PCR-RFLP.

Results

The MUTYH Gln324His showed strong significant associations with a risk of colorectal cancer (crude odds ratio [OR] 3.30, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.44–7.60, p = 0.005; adjusted OR3.53, 95%CI 1.44–8.70, p = 0.006). The ORs for the APEX1 Asp148Glu were statistically significant (crude OR 2.69, 95%CI 1.45–4.99, p = 0.002; adjusted OR 2.33, 95%CI 1.21–4.48, p = 0.011). The ORs for the MUTYH Gln324His and the APEX1 Asp148Glu were statistically significant for colon cancer (adjusted OR 3.95, 95%CI 1.28–12.20, p = 0.017 for MUTYH Gln324His ; adjusted OR 3.04, 95%CI 1.38–6.71, p = 0.006 for APEX1 Asp148Glu). The joint effect of tobacco exposure and the MUTYH Gln324His showed a significant association with colorectal cancer risk in non-smokers (adjusted OR 4.08, 95%CI 1.22–13.58, p = 0.022) and the APEX1 Asp148Glu was significantly increased in smokers (adjusted OR 5.02, 95%CI 1.80–13.99, p = 0.002). However, the distributions of OGG1 Ser326Cys and XRCC1 Arg399Gln were not associated with a colorectal cancer risk.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the MUTYH Gln324His and the APEX1 Asp148Glu constitutes an increased risk of colorectal cancer, especially colon cancer. The MUTYH Gln324His is strongly associated with colorectal cancer susceptibility in never smoking history, whereas the APEX1 Asp148Glu genotype constitutes an increased risk of colorectal cancer when accompanied by smoking exposure.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of death and is influenced by genetic characteristics and environmental factors. Humans are exposed daily to a large variety of toxic and carcinogenic compounds due to habits such as tobacco smoking. Tobacco smoking produces major classes of carcinogenic compounds: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), aromatic amines, and heterocyclic amines (HCA). Several of these compounds can produce bulky DNA adducts [1]. The colorectal mucosa is exposed to these compounds through either the alimentary tract or the circulatory system. DNA adducts were detected in the colonic mucosa of smokers than in nonsmokers [2]. A previous study found that heavy smokers have a 2–3-fold elevated risk of colorectal adenoma [3]. Our previous data showed that genetic polymorphisms of NAT2 and CYP1A2 in metabolic processes contributed to colorectal cancer risk depending on smoking status in Japanese population [4]. Therefore, tobacco smoking might be a potential risk factor for colorectal cancer.

DNA repair genes are increasingly being studied for cancer risk because of their critical role in maintaining genome integrity. The base excision repair (BER) pathway, one of four major DNA repair pathways, has a principal role in the repair of mutations caused by oxidized or reduced bases [5]. Therefore, polymorphisms of DNA repair genes may increase the risk of colorectal cancer. In addition, smoking-induced oxidative DNA base modifications and single-strand breaks are repaired by the BER pathway. In the current study, we focused on genes encoding four key proteins in the BER pathway: OGG1 (8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase), MUTYH/MYH (Mut Y homolog), APEX1/APE1 (Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease-1), and XRCC1 (X-ray cross-complementing group 1).OGG1 is a DNA glycosylase that removes 8-oxo-7, 8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-G), which is the most stable form of a highly mutagenic oxidative DNA adduct that pairs with cytosine [6]. MUTYH is another DNA glycosylase that removes adenine paired with 8-oxo-G or 1, 2-dihydro-2-oxoadenine (2-OH-A) paired with guanine [7]. The 2-OH-A level is increased by exposure to reactive oxygen species [8]. APEX1 removes abasic sites formed in DNA cleavage by OGG1 and MUTYH and recruits DNA polymerase β and DNA ligase III [9]. X-ray cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) is a multidomain protein that interacts with poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, DNA ligase III and DNA polymerase β, and repairs DNA single-strand breaks by generating a single nucleotide repair patch (short-patch BER)[10].

We conducted a hospital-based case-control study to elucidate the DNA repair gene polymorphisms, OGG1 Ser326Cys (rs1052133), MUTYH Gln324His (rs3219489),APEX1 Asp148Glu (rs1130409) and XRCC1 Arg399Gln (rs25487). OGG1 Ser326Cys, APEX1 Asp148Glu and XRCC1 Arg399Gln have also been linked to a risk of colorectal cancer [1113]. Germ-line variants, Tyr165Cys and Gly382Asp, of the MUTYH gene have been associated with colorectal adenomas in Caucasians, not in Asians [1416]. Recent studies reported that MUTYH Gln324His mutation was the most frequent mutation in Japanese patients with adenomatous popyposis, and the gene polymorphisms was associated with the risk of proximal colon cancer in the Japanese population [17, 18]. To our knowledge, few previous studies have examined the effect of these polymorphisms on the association between smoking and colorectal cancer [19, 20]. These polymorphisms were analyzed to evaluate genetic susceptibility to colorectal cancer and the possible modification effect on the relationship between smoking and colorectal cancer risk.

Materials and methods

Subjects

A total of 68 colorectal cancer patients (40 with colon cancer, 23 with rectal cancer, and 5 with unknown) were recruited into the study between October 2003 and March 2005 at the Kobe Medical Center and Kobe Rosai Hospital in Kobe, Japan. Patients were eligible if they underwent major colon or rectal surgery for a diagnosis of primary colon or rectal cancer. A total of 121 controls with no current or previous diagnosis of cancer were recruited between November 2002 and March 2003, as reported in our previous study [4]. The study design was approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Genetic and Genomic Research, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine. Informed consent was obtained and detailed data on smoking were collected in a personal interview. The amount of smoke exposure was calculated in pack-years: the product of the number of years an individual had smoked and the average number of cigarettes smoked per day, converted into a standard pack of 20 cigarettes. Samples were coded after blood and data collection.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA used in the study was isolated for a previous study [4]. For MUTYH Gln324His, PCR was performed in a 25-μL reaction mixture containing 50 ng DNA, 250 mmol/l of each primer, 250 μmol/l of dNTPs, 1× PCR buffer, and 0.75 U of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Shiga, Japan) using a programmable thermocycler PC-701 (Astec K.K, Fukuoka, Japan). The primer sequences were 5'-TGC CGA TTC CCT CCA TTC TCT CTT G-3' and 5'-TCT TGG CTT GAG TAG GGT TCG GG-3'. PCR conditions were 3 min at 94°C; 38 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 64°C, and 1 min at 72°C; followed by final extension for 10 min at 72°C. After amplification, the PCR products were digested with HpyCH4 III (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) for 4 h at 37°C in a final volume of 23 μl. Digested fragments were separated by electrophoresis on 12% polyacrylamide gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining using a 20-bp DNA Ladder (Takara, Shiga, Japan) as a size marker. All experiments included positive and negative controls for each polymorphism. In PCR-RFLP genotyping of MUTYH, complete digestion of PCR products produced 292-bp fragments for the Gln allele, and 239-bp and 53-bp fragments for the His allele (the 53-bp fragment was too small to resolve accurately)(Figure 1). The genotypes of OGG1 Ser326Cys [21], APEX1 Asp148Glu [22], and XRCC1 Arg399Gln [23] were determined by PCR-RFLP analysis.
Figure 1

Representative result for the MUTYH Gln324His polymorphisms by PCR-RFLP methods. Lane M, markers; lane 1, His/His; lane 2, Gln/His; lane 3, Gln/Gln.

Statistical analysis

Differences in demographic variables, smoking and grouped genotypic frequencies between the patients and controls were evaluated using a Chi-square test. All reported P-values are two-sided with p < 0.05 considered to be significant. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested using a Chi-square test to compare the observed genotype frequencies with the expected frequencies among the control subjects. The association between variant genotypes and risk of colorectal cancer was estimated by computing the odds ratios (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) from unconditional logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, gender, and smoking habit. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software (version 14.0 for Windows; SPSS Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The subjects were divided into two groups according to pack-years of smoking: non-smokers (pack-years = 0), and smokers (pack-years > 0). The OR for each variant genotype was calculated for each subgroup.

Results

The study included 68 patients and 121 controls (Table 1). The distribution of males (patients, 54.4%; controls, 61.2%) and females (patients, 38.2%; controls, 38.8%) did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.872), and there was also no difference in the average age (± SD) of the patients (67.3 ± 10.9 years old) and controls (67.4 ± 6.7 years old) (p = 0.923). Non-smokers comprised 52.9% of patients and 45.5% of controls and smokers comprised 38.2% of patients and 49.6% of controls. There was no difference in smoking status between patients and controls (p = 0.253). Subsites were divided into 40 colon (58.8%) and 23 rectum (33.8%), and 5 unknown (7.4%).
Table 1

Characteristics of colorectal cancer case and control subjects

Item

Patients

Controls

P-value

 

n

%

n

%

 

Number

68

 

121

  

Gender

     

   males

37

54.4

74

61.2

0.872a

   females

26

38.2

47

38.8

 

   unknown

5

7.4

0

0.0

 

Age

     

   ~64

21

30.9

50

41.3

 

   65~69

13

19.1

29

24.0

 

   70~74

13

19.1

20

16.5

 

   75~

16

23.5

22

18.2

 

   unknown

5

7.4

0

0.0

 

   Mean ± S.D.

67.3 ± 10.9

 

67.4 ± 6.7

 

0.923b

Smoking status (Pack-years)

     

   non-smokers (Pack-years = 0)

36

52.9

55

45.5

0.253a

   smokers (Pack-years > 0)

26

38.2

60

49.6

 

   unknown

6

8.8

6

5.0

 

Subsites

     

   colon

40

58.8

   

   rectum

23

33.8

   

   unknown

5

7.4

   

a: X2 analysis

b: Student's T-test

Genotyping and allele frequencies of OGG1 Ser326Cys,MUTYH Gln324His,APEX1 Asp148Glu, and XRCC1 Arg399Gln adjusted for gender, age and smoking habit are shown in Table 2. The allele frequencies of the four gene polymorphisms in controls were consistent with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The ORs for the OGG1 Ser/Cys and Cys/Cys genotypes compared with the Ser/Ser genotype were not statistically significant (crude odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.73–2.78, p = 0.297; adjusted OR 1.43, 95%CI 0.69–2.95, p = 0.332). The ORs for the MUTYH Gln/His and His/His genotypes were shown to be statistically associated with the Gln/Gln genotype (crude OR 3.30, 95%CI 1.44–7.60, p = 0.005; adjusted OR3.53, 95%CI 1.44–8.70, p = 0.006). The ORs for the APEX1 Asp/Glu and Glu/Glu genotypes compared with Asp/Asp genotype were significantly increased (crude OR 2.69, 95%CI 1.45–4.99, p = 0.002; adjusted OR 2.33, 95%CI 1.21–4.48, p = 0.011). The ORs for the XRCC1 Arg/Gln and Gln/Gln genotypes compared with the Arg/Arg genotype were not statistically significant (crude OR 0.65, 95%CI 0.36–1.19, p = 0.164; adjusted OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.31–1.15, p = 0.125). These results indicate that the MUTYH Gln324His and the APEX1 Asp148Glu carry a significant risk for carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer.
Table 2

Genotype distribution in colorectal cancer and Allele frequency

         

Allele frequency

Genotype

patients (n = 68)

controls (n = 121)

crude

adjusted

 

patients

controls

 

n

%

n

%

OR (95%CI)

p

OR (95%CI)a

p

 

%

%

OGG1

           

   Ser/Ser

17

25.0

39

32.2

1.00

 

1.00

 

Ser

52.9

54.6

   Ser/Cys,Cys/Cys

51

75.0

82

67.8

1.43 (0.73–2.78)

0.297

1.43 (0.69–2.95)

0.332

Cys

47.1

45.5

MUTYH

           

   Gln/Gln

8

11.8

37

30.6

1.00

 

1.00

 

Gln

39.0

59.1

   Gln/His,His/His

60

88.2

84

69.4

3.30 (1.44–7.60)

0.005

3.53 (1.44–8.70)

0.006

His

61.0

40.9

APEX1

           

   Asp/Asp

23

33.8

70

57.9

1.00

 

1.00

 

Asp

64.0

74.8

   Asp/Glu,Glu/Glu

45

66.2

51

42.1

2.69 (1.45–4.99)

0.002

2.33 (1.21–4.48)

0.011

Glu

36.0

25.2

XRCC1

           

   Arg/Arg

42

61.8

62

51.2

1.00

 

1.00

 

Arg

78.7

71.1

   Arg/Gln,Gln/Gln

26

38.2

59

48.8

0.65 (0.36–1.19)

0.164

0.60 (0.31–1.15)

0.125

Gln

21.3

28.9

a: OR adjusted for gender, age, smoking habit

The distributions of the four polymorphisms were compared among cases of colon and rectal cancer, and the OR adjusted for gender, age and smoking habit is shown in Table 3. The adjusted ORs for the OGG1 Ser/Cys and Cys/Cys genotypes compared with the Ser/Ser genotype were not statistically significant (OR 1.28, 95%CI 0.55–2.99, p = 0.567 for colon cancer; OR 1.66, 95%CI 0.56–4.87, p = 0.359 for rectal cancer). The adjusted ORs for the MUTYH Gln/His and His/His genotypes were significant compared with the Gln/Gln genotype for colon cancer, but not for rectal cancer (OR 3.95, 95%CI 1.28–12.20, p = 0.017 for colon cancer; OR 3.06, 95%CI 0.84–11.11, p = 0.089 for rectal cancer). The adjusted ORs for the APEX1 Asp/Glu and Glu/Glu genotypes compared with Asp/Asp genotype were statistically significant for colon cancer, but not for rectal cancer (OR 3.04, 95%CI 1.38–6.71, p = 0.006 for colon cancer; OR 1.61, 95%CI 0.64–4.09, p = 0.315 for rectal cancer). The adjusted ORs for the XRCC1 Arg/Gln and Gln/Gln genotypes compared with the Arg/Arg genotype were not statistically significant (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.28–1.30, p = 0.194 for colon cancer; OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.24–1.58, p = 0.315 for rectal cancer).Therefore, the cancer subsite-specific study indicated that the MUTYH Gln324His and the APEX1 Asp148Glu have a colon cancer-specific risk.
Table 3

Genotype distribution in relation to subsites in colorectal cancer

Genotype

Colon cancer

Rectal cancer

 

patients (n = 40)

controls (n = 121)

crude

adjusted

patients (n = 23)

controls (n = 121)

crude

adjusted

 

n

%

n

%

OR (95%CI)

p

OR (95%CI)a

P

n

%

n

%

OR (95%CI)

p

OR (95%CI)a

p

OGG1

                

   Ser/Ser

10

25.0

39

32.2

1.00

 

1.00

 

5

21.7

39

32.2

1.00

 

1.00

 

   Ser/Cys,Cys/Cys

30

75.0

82

67.8

1.43 (0.63–3.21)

0.390

1.28 (0.55–2.99)

0.567

18

78.3

82

67.8

1.71 (0.59–4.95)

0.321

1.66 (0.56–4.87)

0.359

MUTYH

                

   Gln/Gln

4

10.0

37

30.6

1.00

 

1.00

 

3

13.0

37

30.6

1.00

 

1.00

 

   Gln/His,His/His

36

90.0

84

69.4

3.96 (1.32–11.95)

0.014

3.95 (1.28–12.20)

0.017

20

87.0

84

69.4

2.94 (0.82–10.49)

0.097

3.06 (0.84–11.11)

0.089

APEX1

                

   Asp/Asp

12

30.0

70

57.9

1.00

 

1.00

 

11

47.8

70

579

1.00

 

1.00

 

   Asp/Glu,Glu/Glu

28

70.0

51

42.1

3.20 (1.49–6.89)

0.003

3.04 (1.38–6.71)

0.006

12

52.2

51

42.1

1.50 (0.61–3.66)

0.376

1.61 (0.64–4.09)

0.315

XRCC1

                

   Arg/Arg

25

62.5

62

51.2

1.00

 

1.00

 

14

60.9

62

51.2

1.00

 

1.00

 

   Arg/Gln,Gln/Gln

15

37.5

59

48.8

0.63 (0.30–1.31)

0.217

0.60 (0.28–1.30)

0194

9

39.1

59

48.8

0.68 (0.27–1.68)

0.398

0.62 (0.24–1.58)

0.315

a: OR adjusted for gender, age, smoking habit

The ORs for the combined effect of tobacco exposure (pack-years) and the four polymorphisms, adjusted for gender and age, are shown in Table 4. The adjusted ORs for the OGG1 Ser/Cys and Cys/Cys genotypes compared with the Ser/Ser genotype showed no statistically significant risk in non-smokers and smokers (OR 1.14, 95%CI 0.41–3.13, p = 0.807 in non-smokers; OR 1.68, 95%CI 0.60–4.67, p = 0.321 in smokers). The adjusted ORs for the MUTYH Gln/His and His/His genotypes compared with the Gln/Gln genotype showed a significant association with colorectal cancer risk in non-smokers, but not in smokers (OR 4.08, 95%CI 1.22–13.58, p = 0.022 in non-smokers; OR 2.95, 95%CI 0.77–11.25, p = 0.113 for smokers). These results show that the MUTYH Gln/His and His/His genotypes are associated with colorectal cancer susceptibility with never smoking history. The adjusted ORs for the APEX1 Asp/Glu and Glu/Glu genotypes compared with the Asp/Asp genotype in smokers was significantly increased (OR 5.02, 95%CI 1.80–13.99, p = 0.002), whereas that in non-smokers did not show a significant (OR 1.56, 95%CI 0.66–3.68, p = 0.311). Smokers with the APEX1 Asp/Glu and Glu/Glu genotypes showed an increased risk of colorectal cancer. The adjusted ORs for the XRCC1 Arg/Gln and Gln/Gln genotypes compared with the Arg/Arg genotype were not statistically significant (OR 0.86, 95%CI 0.37–2.03, p = 0.732 in non-smokers; OR 0.43, 95%CI 0.16–1.16, p = 0.097 in smokers). These results indicate that the MUTYH Gln324His and the APEX Asp148Glu have statistically a significant risk of colorectal cancer according to smoking status.
Table 4

Genotype distribution in relation to smoking status in colorectal cancer

Genotype

non-smokers (Pack-years = 0)

smokers (Pack-years > 0)

 

patients (n = 36)

controls (n = 55)

crude

adjusted

Patients (n = 26)

controls (n = 60)

crude

adjusted

 

n

%

n

%

OR (95%CI)

p

OR (95%CI)a

p

N

%

n

%

OR (95%CI)

p

OR (95%CI)a

p

OGG1

                

   Ser/Ser

8

22.2

14

25.5

1.00

 

1.00

 

7

26.9

23

38.3

1.00

 

1.00

 

   Ser/Cys,Cys/Cys

28

77.8

41

74.5

1.20 (0.44–3.23)

0.725

1.14 (0.41–3.13)

0.807

19

73.1

37

61.7

1.69 (0.61–4.64)

0.310

1.68 (0.60–4.67)

0.321

MUTYH

                

   Gln/Gln

4

11.1

18

32.7

1.00

 

1.00

 

3

11.5

17

28.3

1.00

 

1.00

 

   Gln/His,His/His

32

88.9

37

67.3

3.89 (1.19–12.69)

0.024

4.08 (1.22–13.58)

0.022

23

88.5

43

71.7

3.03 (0.80–11.43)

0.102

2.95 (0.77–11.25)

0.113

APEX1

                

   Asp/Asp

15

41.7

29

52.7

1.00

 

1.00

 

8

30.8

41

68.3

1.00

 

1.00

 

   Asp/Glu,Glu/Glu

21

58.3

26

47.3

1.56 (0.67–3.65)

0.303

1.56 (0.66–3.68)

0.311

18

69.2

19

31.7

4.86 (1.80–13.13)

0.002

5.02 (1.80–13.99)

0.002

XRCC1

                

   Arg/Arg

20

55.6

29

52.7

1.00

 

1.00

 

18

69.2

30

50.0

1.00

 

1.00

 

   Arg/Gln,Gln/Gln

16

44.4

26

47.3

0.89 (0.38–2.08)

0.791

0.86 (0.37–2.03)

0.732

8

30.8

30

50.0

0.44 (0.17–1.18)

0.103

0.43 (0.16–1.16)

0.097

a: OR adjusted for gender, age

Discussion

The association between the risk of colorectal cancer and polymorphisms of four DNA repair genes in the BER pathway was investigated in a small case-control study. No significant relationship was apparent between OGG1 Ser326Cys and colorectal cancer risk. Previous reports have suggested that OGG1 Ser326Cys is associated with colorectal cancer in Caucasians [11, 24], but not among Koreans [25]. Our findings in a Japanese population are consistent with the results from the Korean population study.

Interestingly, we found that the MUTYH Gln324His genotype has a strong significant association with colorectal cancer risk, especially colon cancer. Tao et al. [18] reported MUTYH Gln324His in Japanese was statistically significantly associated with increased risk of proximal colon, but not distal colon or rectal cancer. Therefore, their results are consistent with our study. Moreover, a recent study found that the activity of MUTYH Gln324His is 34% less active than that of wild type [26]. 8-oxo-G is generated by direct oxidation of DNA by a hydroxyl radical, whereas 2-OH-A is exclusively generated by oxidation of dATP in the nucleotide pool [6, 7]. The 2-OH-A level is increased in human cancerous tissues compared to normal tissues [27]. Thus, for colorectal cancer, it is also possible that the enzyme of MUTYH Gln324His may have partially impaired in repair of 2-OH-A opposite guanine, compared to repair of adenine opposite 8-oxo-G, because of the difference in the origin of each oxidized base. We also found that MUTYH Gln324His was statistically associated with increased risk in never smokers. These results suggest that the MUTYH 324His variation may be associated with a risk of colorectal cancer due to an increased mutation frequency, containing environmental factors except smoking.

We indicated that the APEX1 Asp148Glu genotype has a specifically association with colon cancer risk. A previous study reported that this genotype was especially an increased risk of colon cancer risk [28]. We also found a statistically significant association between the APEX1 Asp148Glu genotype and colorectal cancer risk in combination with smoking exposure. Ito et al. [29] reported that the gene-environment interaction between current smoking and APEX1 148 Glu/Glu genotype was statistically significant for lung cancer risk. However, a previous study didn't found about the effect of smoking habit on association between the APEX1 Asp148Glu genotype and colorectal cancer risk [28]. This polymorphism is located within the endonuclease domain of the protein [30], but it does not reduce endonuclease activity [31]. The 148 Glu allele has also been associated with increased mitotic delay after exposure to ionizing radiation [22]. Our results indicate that the APEX1 variation may play an important role in colorectal cancer risk, containing a reduced ability to communicate with the other BER proteins. In contrast, for XRCC1 Arg399Gln variants, we found no relationship with colorectal cancer. The XRCC1 399Gln allele has been linked with a reduced risk of colorectal adenomas [12, 13], and XRCC1 has also been associated with improved progress in patients who underwent chemotherapy, but not in those who received surgery alone [11]. The smoking has an effect on colon adenoma risks among carriers of XRCC1 codon 399 Arg alleles [19, 20]. However, we were unable to detect these relationships in our cases.

Our data may be biased by the relatively small number as a hospital-based case-control study, because we have several limitations. Therefore, we would require further verification as predictive biomarkers in a larger study population and need to clarify the gene-environment interaction between smoking and these genotypes.

In conclusion, MUTYH Gln324His and APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphisms are important risk factors for colorectal cancer, especially colon cancer, in the Japanese population. In particular, the MUTYH Gln324His genotype is associated with colorectal cancer susceptibility in never smoking history, whereas the APEX1 Asp148Glu genotype constitutes an increased risk of colorectal cancer in combination with smoking exposure. MUTYH Gln324His and APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphisms may be useful markers of genetic susceptibility to colorectal cancer.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Health Sciences, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
(2)
Osaka Cancer Immuno-Chemotherapy Center
(3)
Clinical Laboratory, Otemae Hospital
(4)
Department of Surgery, Yoshida Ardent Hospital
(5)
Department of Surgery, Yodogawa Christian Hospital
(6)
Department of Surgery, Kobe Rosai Hospital
(7)
Department of Surgery, Kobe Medical Center

References

  1. Barrowman JA, Rahman A, Lindstrom MB, Borgstrom B: Intestinal absorption and metabolism of hydrocarbons. Prog Lipid Res. 1989, 28: 189-203. 10.1016/0163-7827(89)90012-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexandrov K, Rojas M, Kadlubar FF, Lang NP, Bartsch H: Evidence of anti-benzo[a]pyrene diolepoxide-DNA adduct formation in human colon mucosa. Carcinogenesis. 1996, 17: 2081-2083. 10.1093/carcin/17.9.2081.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Giovannucci E: An updated review of the epidemiological evidence that cigarette smoking increases risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001, 10: 725-731.Google Scholar
  4. Yoshida K, Osawa K, Kasahara M, et al: Association of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, GSTM1 and NAT2 gene polymorphisms with colorectal cancer and smoking. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007, 8: 438-444.Google Scholar
  5. Wood RD, Mitchell M, Sgouros J, Lindahl T: Human DNA repair genes. Science. 2001, 291: 1284-1289. 10.1126/science.1056154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Boiteux S, Radicella JP: The human OGG1 gene: structure, functions, and its implication in the process of carcinogenesis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000, 377: 1-8. 10.1006/abbi.2000.1773.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ohtsubo T, Nishioka K, Imaiso Y, et al: Identification of human MutY homolog (hMYH) as a repair enzyme for 2-hydroxyadenine in DNA and detection of multiple forms of hMYH located in nuclei and mitochondria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 1355-1364. 10.1093/nar/28.6.1355.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kamiya H, Kasai H: Formation of 2-hydroxydeoxyadenosine triphosphate, an oxidatively damaged nucleotide, and its incorporation by DNA polymerases. Steady-state kinetics of the incorporation. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 19446-19450. 10.1074/jbc.270.33.19446.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett RA, Wilson DM, Wong D, Demple B: Interaction of human apurinic endonuclease and DNA polymerase beta in the base excision repair pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 7166-7169. 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7166.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldecott KW, Aoufouchi S, Johnson P, Shall S: XRCC1 polypeptide interacts with DNA polymerase beta and possibly poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, and DNA ligase III is a novel molecular 'nick-sensor' in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996, 24: 4387-4394. 10.1093/nar/24.22.4387.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Moreno V, Gemignani F, Landi S, et al: Polymorphisms in genes of nucleotide and base excision repair: risk and prognosis of colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 2101-2108. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1363.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Berndt SI, Huang WY, Fallin MD, et al: Genetic variation in base excision repair genes and the prevalence of advanced colorectal adenoma. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 1395-1404. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1390.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Skjelbred CF, Saebø M, Wallin H, et al: Polymorphisms of the XRCC1, XRCC3 and XPD genes and risk of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma, in a Norwegian cohort: a case control study. BMC Cancer. 2006, 6: 67-10.1186/1471-2407-6-67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Al-Tassan N, Chmiel NH, Maynard J, et al: Inherited variants of MYH associated with somatic G:C-->T:A mutations in colorectal tumors. Nat Genet. 2002, 30: 227-232. 10.1038/ng828.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Miyaki M, Iijima T, Yamaguchi T, et al: Germline mutations of the MYH gene in Japanese patients with multiple colorectal adenomas. Mutat Res. 2005, 578: 430-433.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim IJ, Ku JL, Kang HC, et al: Mutational analysis of OGG1, MYH, MTH1 in FAP, HNPCC and sporadic colorectal cancer patients: R154H OGG1 polymorphism is associated with sporadic colorectal cancer patients. Hum Genet. 2004, 115: 498-503. 10.1007/s00439-004-1186-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Yanaru-Fujisawa R, Matsumoto T, Ushijima Y, et al: Genomic and functional analyses of MUTYH in Japanese patients with adenomatous polyposis. Clin Genet. 2008, 73: 545-553.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tao H, Shinmura K, Suzuki M, et al: Association between genetic polymorphisms of the base excision repair gene MUTYH and increased colorectal cancer risk in a Japanese population. Cancer Sci. 2008, 99: 355-360. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00694.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Stern MC, Siegmund KD, Conti DV, Corral R, Haile RW: XRCC1, XRCC3, and XPD polymorphisms as modifiers of the effect of smoking and alcohol on colorectal adenoma risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006, 15: 2384-2390. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0381.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Stern MC, Conti DV, Siegmund KD, et al: DNA repair single-nucleotide polymorphisms in colorectal cancer and their role as modifiers of the effect of cigarette smoking and alcohol in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007, 16: 2363-2372. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0268.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Lum-Jones A, Seifried A, Wilkens LR: Association of the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002, 11: 409-412.Google Scholar
  22. Hu JJ, Smith TR, Miller MS, Mohrenweiser HW, Golden A, Case LD: Amino acid substitution variants of APE1 and XRCC1 genes associated with ionizing radiation sensitivity. Carcinogenesis. 2001, 22: 917-922. 10.1093/carcin/22.6.917.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Duell EJ, Wiencke JK, Cheng TJ, et al: Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC2 and biomarkers of DNA damage in human blood mononuclear cells. Carcinogenesis. 2000, 21: 965-971. 10.1093/carcin/21.5.965.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen R, Saebø M, Skjelbred CF, et al: GPX Pro198Leu and OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphisms and risk of development of colorectal adenomas and colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2005, 229: 85-91. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.04.019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim JI, Park YJ, Kim KH, et al: hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism modifies the significance of the environmental risk factor for colon cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2003, 9: 956-960.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ali M, Kim H, Cleary S, Cupples C, Gallinger S, Bristow R: Characterization of mutant MUTYH proteins associated with familial colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2008, 135: 499-507. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.035.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Toyokuni S, Mori T, Dizdaroglu M: DNA base modifications in renal chromatin of Wistar rats treated with a renal carcinogen, ferric nitrilotriacetate. Int J Cancer. 1994, 57: 123-128. 10.1002/ijc.2910570122.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Pardini B, Naccarati A, Novotny J, et al: DNA repair genetic polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer in the Czech Republic. Mutat Res. 2008, 638: 146-153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ito H, Matsuo K, Hamajima N, et al: Gene-environment interactions between the smoking habit and polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes, APE1 Asp148Glu and XRCC1 Arg399Gln, in Japanese lung cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2004, 25: 1395-1401. 10.1093/carcin/bgh153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Walker LJ, Robson CN, Black E, Gillespie D, Hickson ID: Identification of residues in the human DNA repair enzyme HAP1 (Ref-1) that are essential for redox regulation of Jun DNA binding. Mol Cell Biol. 1993, 13: 5370-5376.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hadi MZ, Coleman MA, Fidelis K, Mohrenweiser HW, Wilson DM: Functional characterization of Ape1 variants identified in the human population. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 3871-3879. 10.1093/nar/28.20.3871.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kasahara et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.