Open Access

Increased HMGB1 and cleaved caspase-3 stimulate the proliferation of tumor cells and are correlated with the poor prognosis in colorectal cancer

  • Zhengxiang Zhang1,
  • Min Wang2,
  • Ling Zhou2,
  • Xiao Feng1,
  • Jin Cheng1,
  • Yang Yu1,
  • Yanping Gong3,
  • Ying Zhu2,
  • Chuanyuan Li4,
  • Ling Tian3Email author and
  • Qian Huang1Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201534:51

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-015-0166-1

Received: 10 February 2015

Accepted: 6 May 2015

Published: 20 May 2015

Abstract

Background

Dying tumor cells after irradiation could promote the proliferation of living tumor cells might cause tumor relapse and treatment failure. Our previous study showed that activated caspase-3 after irradiation probably participates in tumor repopulation. In this study, we investigated whether high mobility group box 1(HMGB1) is also involved in tumor repopulation.

Methods

Colorectal tumor cells were irradiated. The cleaved caspase-3 (CC3) in irradiated tumor cells and HMGB1 in the supernatant of irradiated tumor cells were detected by Western blot. A large number of irradiated colorectal tumor cells (feeder cells) were then co-cultured with a small number of luciferase-labeled living colorectal tumor cells (reporter cells) and proliferation of reporter cells was measured by bioluminescence imaging. The CC3 and HMGB1 protein expression in colorectal tumor and peritumoral tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry and their correlation with prognosis were analyzed.

Results

The irradiated colorectal tumor cells underwent apoptosis and necrosis and produced CC3 in tumor cells and HMGB1 in the supernatant of cultured cells. The increased expression of secretory HMGB1 correlated with CC3 level and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) after irradiation in vitro. The irradiated dying cells remarkably stimulated living tumor cell proliferation. Interestedly, immunohistochemistry staining showed that positive HMGB1, CC3, and Ki67 expression were significantly higher in colorectal tumor tissues than in peritumoral tissues (p <0.01). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that high HMGB1, CC3, and Ki67 levels were significantly associated with poor prognosis (p <0.05, p <0.01). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model showed that TNM staging and HMGB1 were independent prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) (p <0.01, p <0.001).

Conclusion

Both apoptotic and necrotic cells could stimulate proliferation of living tumor cells, and the increased expression of CC3 and HMGB1 in tumor cells could be new markers for poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients.

Keywords

Colorectal cancerCaspase-3High mobility group box 1(HMGB1)Dying cellsTumor cell proliferation

Introduction

Resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is a universal obstacle in cancer treatment and one of the main causes of tumor relapse and treatment failure. However, the mechanisms responsible for drug or radiation resistance have yet to be fully elucidated [1]. A recent study of ours demonstrated that dying tumor cells after radiotherapy can stimulate the proliferation of residual living tumor cells, which may be a possible mechanism of tumor resistance and repopulation after radiotherapy [2]. This process was found to be associated with the activation of caspase-3 and caspase-7. The activated caspases can further activate downstream effectors. One of these key effectors is cytosolic calcium-independent phospholipase A2 (iPLA2), which can promote prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production. PGE2 can then stimulate the proliferation of living tumor cells in vitro and in vivo [2, 3]. A recent study by Kurtova et al. also demonstrated that chemotherapy effectively induces apoptosis and PGE2 release, which paradoxically promotes neighboring cancer stem cell repopulation and leads to subsequent chemoresistance [4]. Ford et al. also demonstrated that apoptotic tumor cells promoted tumor growth, angiogenesis, and accumulation of tumor associated macrophages in aggressive B cell lymphomas [5]. However, tumor resistance and progression after therapy is a highly complex process and many signaling pathways may be involved, and whether cell death signaling pathways other than apoptosis could promote tumor progression has not been clarified.

High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a highly conserved nuclear protein. In cell nuclei, HMGB1 functions as a DNA chaperone to regulate DNA replication, recombination, transcription, and repair [6]. Also, HMGB1 can be released or secreted from cells into the extracellular matrix to function as a signaling molecule. In general, HMGB1 is passively released from dead, dying, or injured cells. Therefore, extracellular HMGB1 is thought to be an optimal “necrosis marker” selected by the innate immune system to recognize tissue damage [7]. The extracellular HMGB1 binds to several cell surface receptors, including the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) [8]. RAGE was the first receptor demonstrated to bind HMGB1 [9], and the binding of HMGB1 to RAGE stimulates proliferation and differentiation of cancer cells as well as tissue regeneration [10]. Recent studies showed that HMGB1 could promote chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer and lung adenocarcinoma through HMGB1 mediated autophagy [11, 12]. In the clinic, the expression of RAGE is closely associated with invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer [13] and colorectal cancer [14]. Hongo et al. also found that HMGB1 expression detected by immunohistochemistry correlates with the resistance of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in lower rectal cancer [15].

In this study, the role of HMGB1 in CRC tumor cell proliferation induced by irradiated dying cells was investigated in vitro, and the clinical significance of HMGB1 expression in colorectal cancer patients was analyzed by comparing its expression with the expression of CC3, RAGE, and Ki67.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and irradiation

HT29, HCT8, SW620, CaCO2, RKO cells were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China) and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (Thermo Scientific Inc., Beijing, China) containing 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Tianhang Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China), supplemented with 1 % penicillin and 1 % streptomycin at 37 °C under 5 % CO2. Cells were irradiated with X-rays using an Oncor linear accelerator (Siemens, Amberg, Germany). The dose rate was approximately 3.6 Gy/min.

Tumor cell proliferation model in vitro

HT29 cells irradiated with various doses of X-rays were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 2.5 × 105/well. After the cells became attached (about 6 h), the reporter cells (non-irradiated HT29 with firefly luciferase and GFP fusion gene, Fluc), were seeded into the plates at a density of 1000/well and co-cultured for about 2 weeks. The substrate D-luciferin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) prepared for a final concentration of 0.15 mg/ml was added, and the luciferase activity was detected with NC100 instrument (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany). The final luciferase signal readouts were analyzed quantitatively by the manufacturer supplied software and represented the status of accelerated proliferation of reporter cells.

Western blot

Total protein was extracted with RIPA lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Western blot was performed as previously described [16]. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (MA, USA. HMGB1, 1:1000 dilution; PCNA, 1:1000 dilution; CC3, 1:1000 dilution; β-actin, 1:1000 dilution) overnight at 4 °C and then incubated with secondary antibodies (1:5000 dilution, Jackson Immuno Research, PA, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. ECL Plus (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was used to visualize the signals on the membrane.

To detect secretory HMGB1, cell culture supernatants were collected at 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 1 day, 2 day, 3 day, 4 day, and 5 day. Secretory HMGB1 was detected through Western blotting shown above. Gray value of the bands in the Western blot was analyzed using ImageJ software [17].

Flow cytometry of cell death

Exponentially growing HT29 cells were seeded into 6-cm dishes and irradiated. Cells were trypsinized and suspended 48 h after irradiation. The suspended cells were stained with Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) using FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD company, USA) and subjected to flow cytometry using Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer (BD company). AnnexinV+ PI cells were regarded as apoptotic cells, while AnnexinV+ PI+ cells as necrotic cells [18, 19].

Patient selection

A total of 73 patients that underwent radical resection for CRC between January 1, 2009 and December 30, 2010 at First People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University were included in this study. The number of patients meets the requirement of the estimated size for two-sample comparison of survivor functions (Log-rank test, Freedman method, α = 0.05, power = 0.80). CRC was diagnosed by morphological features and immunohistochemical staining. Information about lymph node and distant metastasis and disease-related death were obtained from medical records or telephone interview. 28 peritumoral tissues were collected from the 73 CRC patients during the same time period. All procedures were done ethically with pre-approval from the Ethics Committee for Human Studies, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Among the 73 patients, 39 were male and 34 were female with a mean age of 70 years and a range of 37 to 93 years. Staging was performed according to the TNM system recommended by the American Joint Committee on Cancer [20]. Five cases were stage I, 34 were stage II, 30 were stage III, and 4 were stage IV. Lymph node metastasis was found in 36 cases, and distant metastasis was found in 4 cases. 27 patients died during the follow-up. The average follow-up period was 41.137 months with a maximum of 71 months and a median of 48 months. Clinical information about the 73 CRC samples is described in detail in Table 1.
Table 1

Summary of clinical characteristics in 73 patients of colon cancer

Characteristics

Patient no. (%)

Sex

Male

39(53.42)

Female

34(46.58)

Age

Mean

70 ± 12.14

Median

72

Range

37-93

≤70 y

30(41.10)

>70 y

43(58.90)

TNM stage

Stage I

5(6.85)

Stage II

34(46.58)

Stage III

30(41.10)

Stage IV

4(5.48)

Lymph nodes

Negative

37(50.68)

Positive

36(49.32)

Metastasis

Negative

69(94.52)

Positive

4(5.48)

Tissue microarrays

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were created from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue blocks at the Department of Pathology, First People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The slides of 73 patients were reviewed by an experienced pathologist and the representative area of each tumor was marked on the slide. All cases were adenocarcinoma with different degrees of differentiation.

Immunohistochemistry staining and scoring

The tissue slides were deparaffinized, and antigen retrieval was performed by immersing the slides into boiling EDTA-Tris buffer (pH 8.2) for 4 min. After incubation with 3 % H2O2 for 15 min, slides were incubated with primary antibody overnight (4 °C), followed by Gtvision III detection system (Gene Tech, Shanghai, China) as secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature. DAB (3,3-diaminobenzidine) was used to visualize positive immune reaction. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. The primary antibodies included CC3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:300 dilution), HMGB1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:400 dilution), RAGE (Abcam, 1:100 dilution), and Ki67 (Epitomics, 1:1000 dilution) antibody.

HMGB1 and RAGE immunoreactivity was scored and put into 3 categories based on staining extent and intensity according to a previously described protocol [14, 21]: negative expression was assigned when almost all cells showed no immunoreactivity or uncertain weak staining, low expression was assigned when less than 25 % of tumor cells showed weak to moderate immunoreactivity, high expression was assigned when more than 25 % of tumor cells showed moderate to intense immunoreactivity. CC3 was scored and put into 3 categories based on staining extent (negative for no staining or uncertain staining, ≤10 % positive staining for low expression, >10 % positive staining for high expression) [3]. Ki67 index was assessed by estimation of the percentage of positive tumor cells (low expression for 0 % to 40 % positive staining, high expression for 41 % to 100 % positive staining) [22, 23]. The representative images are provided in Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were assessed using the χ 2 test and Fisher exact test. The correlation between HMGB1 and CC3, RAGE, or Ki67 was examined using Spearman’s rank method. The cumulative survival time was obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. All probabilities were 2-tailed. A p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0 software for Windows (StataCorp, Texas, USA).

Results

Dying cells stimulate tumor cell proliferation

The co-cultured cell model [3] was used to investigate the role of dying cells in tumor cell proliferation. Unlabeled HT29 cells (feeder) were irradiated at various doses (0, 2, 6, 10, and 14 Gy) and then co-cultured with Fluc labeled living HT29 cells (reporter). Bioluminescence signals released by reporter cells were used to gauge the extent of proliferation of living tumor cells. As shown in Fig. 1a, all irradiated feeders, especially those that were irradiated with a dose higher than 6Gy, could stimulate living tumor cell proliferation, which was characterized by a significant increase in luciferase activity of reporter cells. This observation suggests that, after irradiation, dying cells can stimulate tumor cell growth. Although apoptotic cells can promote tumor growth and proliferation of surviving cells after tumor irradiation [3], this study showed that the percentage of apoptosis in cell death modalities was not very high. In contrast, necrotic cells were also observed (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1

HMGB1 stimulated cell proliferation after irradiation. (a) The irradiated HT29 cells (feeder cells) significantly stimulated HT29 Fluc labeled cells growth compared to non-irradiated HT29 feeder cells or reporter alone cells (No feeder). **p <0.01. (b) Cell death detection by flow cytometry. (c) Western blot of correlated expressions of HMGB1 and PCNA protein in colon cancer cells. Relative intensity changes of HMGB1 and PCNA were analyzed through gray value using software ImageJ. Positive correlation between HMGB1 expression and proliferative marker was observed in colon cell lines. (d) Western blot of HMGB1, PCNA, and caspases-3 levels in HT29 and HCT8 cells. Cells were irradiated at 10 Gy. The supernatant HMGB1 was elevated significantly in both cell lines, while there was no obvious change of intracellular HMGB1. PCNA and increased caspases-3 cleavage were also observed after irradiation

Secretory HMGB1 coupled with increased CC3 after irradiation in vitro

Extracellular HMGB1 is thought to be an optimal “necrosis marker” [24, 25] and PCNA is a well-known proliferative marker [26]. Western blot showed that the signal intensities of the two proteins were higher or lower in colon cancer cell lines (Fig. 1c), indicating the positive correlation of HMGB1 with a proliferative marker.

To explore the role of HMGB1 in tumor cell proliferation, HT29 and HCT8 cells in exponential growth phase were irradiated for 10Gy, and secretory HMGB1 in cell culture supernatant and intracellular HMGB1 in cell lysate was detected simultaneously by Western blot. We observed that secretory HMGB1 increased at 6 h after radiotherapy. Expression of the proliferative marker PCNA was also found to increase rapidly after radiotherapy. CC3 was significantly increased (Fig. 1d). These findings suggest that the increase in HMGB1 release was accompanied by an increase in CC3 protein level.

The clinical significance of HMGB1, CC3, RAGE, and Ki67 in colorectal cancer patients

HMGB1, RAGE, CC3 and Ki67 proteins were detected by immunohistochemistry. CC3 positive staining was mainly localized in the cytoplasm and some at the membrane, while HMGB1, RAGE and Ki67 were localized in the nucleus (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Positive HMGB1, CC3, and Ki67 expression was significantly higher in tumor tissues than in peritumoral tissues (p <0.01, Table 2). The high CC3 levels positively correlated with high TNM staging and distant metastasis (Table 3). Positive RAGE expression correlated with higher TNM staging and lymph node metastasis. Ki67 expression was found be associated with lymph node metastasis. In contrast, HMGB1 was unexpectedly found to be associated with neither TNM staging nor metastasis.
Table 2

Comparison of HMGB1, CC3 and Ki67 expressions in colorectal cancer with peritumor tissues

  

Tumor tissue (n)

Peritumor tissue (n)

p value

HMGB1

Negative

12

20

0.000*

 

low

29

8

 
 

high

32

0

 

CC3

Negative

18

26

0.000*

 

low

35

2

 
 

high

20

0

 

Ki67

low

38

24

0.003*

 

high

35

4

 

*,statistically significant

Table 3

Correlation of clinicopathologic parameters with HMGB1, CC3, Ki6 and RAGE expressions

 

HMGB1 + (%)

p

CC3 + (%)

p

Ki67 + (%)

p

RAGE+(%)

p

Sex

 

0.964

 

0.081

 

0.121

 

0.524

Male

17(43.59)

 

14(35.90)

 

22(56.41)

 

26(66.67)

 

female

15(44.12)

 

6(17.65)

 

13(38.24)

 

25(73.53)

 

Age

 

0.684

 

0.138

 

0.769

 

0.589

≤70 y

14(46.67)

 

11(36.67)

 

15(50)

 

22(73.33)

 

>70 y

18(41.86)

 

9(20.93)

 

20(46.51)

 

29(67.44)

 

TNM stage

 

0.496

 

0.007*

 

0.321

 

0.03*

Stage I

3(60)

 

2(40)

 

2(40)

 

1(20)

 

Stage II

14(41.18)

 

7(20.59)

 

13(38.24)

 

22(64.71)

 

Stage III

12(40)

 

7(20.59)

 

17(56.67)

 

25(83.33)

 

Stage IV

3(75)

 

4(100)

 

3(75)

 

3(75)

 

Lymphnodes

 

0.565

 

0.551

 

0.007*

 

0.050*

Negative

15(40.54)

 

9(24.32)

 

12(32.43)

 

22(59.46)

 

Positive

17(47.22)

 

11(30.56)

 

23(63.89)

 

29(80.56)

 

Metastasis

 

0.196

 

0.001*

 

0.265

 

0.818

Negative

29(42.03)

 

16(23.19)

 

32(46.38)

 

48(69.57)

 

Positive

3(75)

 

4(100)

 

3(75)

 

3(75)

 

+High level expression of proteins

*p value ≤0.05. The difference of protein expressions between clinicopathological parameters was statistically significant

The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that TNM staging was clearly correlated with overall survival in CRC (Fig. 2a). Interestedly, high HMGB1 expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis. In addition, positive CC3 and Ki67 expression was also significantly correlated with shorter survival time in CRC patients (p = 0.0281, p = 0.0006, p = 0.033, respectively; Fig. 2b, c, d, Table 4). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model showed that TNM staging and HMGB1 (p = 0.000 and p = 0.008, respectively), but not CC3 and Ki67 (p = 0.998 and p = 0.347, respectively) were independent prognostic factors in CRC patients (Table 4).
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in 73 cases of patients with colorectal cancer. The patients with higher stage a, HMGB1 b, CC3 c, Ki67 d, expression were associated with shorter overall survival time

Table 4

Univariate and multivariate survival analysis of overall survival

Variables

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

 

p

p

RR

95 % CI

Sex (female vs male)

0.5873

   

Age (≤70 y vs >70y)

0.0962

   

TNM stage

0.0000*

0.000*

8.19

3.5370-19.0053

Lymph nodes (+ vs -)

0.0000*

   

Metastasis (+ vs–)

0.0000*

   

CC3 (high expression vs otherwise)

0.0006*

0.998

1.00

0.3627-2.7655

HMGB1 (high expression vs otherwise)

0.0281*

0.008*

3.55

1.3972-9.0147

RAGE (high expression vs otherwise)

0.3119

   

Ki67 (high expression vs otherwise)

0.0330*

0.347

1.50

0.6451-3.4806

CI: confidence interval, RR: risk ratio. *statistically significant

Spearman’s rank correlation analysis further showed that HMGB1 positively correlated with CC3 and Ki67 level (correlation coefficient 0.5393, 0.3814, respectively; p <0.001, Table 5). Fig. 3 showed a coordinated expression of HMGB1, CC3, and Ki67 that they were either all positive or all negative/low expression in the same visual field.
Table 5

Relationship between HMGB1 and other protein expression in 73 cases of colorectal cancer

  

Total no. (%)

 

HMGB1, n

 

ρ(rho)

p value

  

Negative

Low

High

CC3

Negative

12(16.44)

8

7

3

0.5393

0.000*

 

low

29(39.73)

3

20

12

  
 

high

32(43.84)

1

2

17

  

RAGE

Negative

5(6.85)

3

0

2

0.0047

0.9683

 

low

17(23.29)

2

6

9

  
 

high

51(69.86)

7

23

21

  

Ki67

low

38(52.05)

11

16

11

0.3814

0.0009*

 

high

35(47.95)

1

13

21

  

ρ(rho): Spearman correlation coefficient

*Correlation is statistically significant at 0.05 level (2 tailed)

Fig. 3

HMGB1, CC3, and Ki67 expression in colorectal cancer tissues in serial sectioning slides. (a, b and c) represented the positive immunohistochemical staining of HMGB1, CC3, and Ki67, respectively, while d, e and f represented the negative staining of the three proteins

Discussion

The purpose of tumor therapy is to induce tumor cell death. However, tumor cell death is not the final step in overcoming cancer. There is increasing evidence showing that dying or dead tumor cells can actually promote tumor development through many mechanisms. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the relationship between death and growth of tumor cells. Our previous studies have demonstrated that apoptotic tumor cells can stimulate the proliferation of residual living tumor cells through activating caspase-3 and its downstream effectors [2, 3]. However, apoptosis is not the only death modality for irradiated tumor cells. Necrosis is also present after irradiation. The mechanism behind dying cells stimulating the growth of living tumor cells might be rather complex. In this study, we investigated the role of apoptotic and necrotic cells in tumor progression, and found that, after irradiation, the dying colorectal cancer cells were composed of both apoptotic and necrotic cells. After irradiation, we were able to detect secreted HMGB1 before caspase-3 cleavage. Interestingly, a cell proliferation marker, PCNA, was found to be increased after irradiation, and its expression paralleled the increased expression of HMGB1 in the medium after irradiation. In addition, we also examined clinical colorectal cancer samples and found that HMGB1 is also a marker for poor prognosis. Therefore, this study may uncover a new mechanism that besides the caspase-3 from apoptotic cells, some other signal molecules, such as HMGB1 released from the necrotic cells, may also exert a role in the proliferation of living colorectal cancer cells.

Because active HMGB1 can be released from dead, dying, and injured cells, it could be a good marker for necrosis. Obviously, this concept is inaccurate with regards to current research [7, 8, 27]. This study showed that the concentrations of HMGB1 in the culture medium of colorectal cancer cells and cleaved caspase-3 in the colorectal cancer cells were increased after radiation, which parallels the increase in PCNA, a well-known proliferative marker. This finding supports the idea that there is a balance between cell death and proliferation in irradiated cells. Although nuclear HMGB1 acts as a DNA chaperone, the extracellular HMGB1 is widely thought of as a signaling molecule and involved in a variety of physical and pathological processes, such as inflammation, cell proliferation and differentiation, and tissue regeneration [6, 8, 27]. It is therefore not difficult to believe that HMGB1 acts as a proliferation factor that is involved in the dying-cell-stimulated proliferation of living tumor cells in this study.

Extracellular HMGB1 acts through binding to several cell surface receptors, including RAGE [8, 9]. The binding of HMGB1 to RAGE is thought to stimulate proliferation and differentiation of cancer cells [10]. Unfortunately, the dynamic changes in the expression of RAGE in the proliferating living colorectal cancer cells were not evident. However, in this study, the positive RAGE expression correlated with higher TNM staging and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. The TNM system is one of the most widely used cancer staging systems that categorizes the stage of a solid cancer based on the size and/or extent of the primary tumor (T), the amount of spread to lymph nodes (N), and the presence of metastasis (M) [20]. In general, higher TNM staging represents rapid tumor progression and highly aggressive tumors. The positive correlation between RAGE expression and TNM stage suggests that RAGE could possibly be a factor that influences tumor prognosis. This is also consistent with a previous report [14].

In addition, this study confirmed the roles of CC3 in the proliferation of tumor cells as well as its association with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients [3]. The role of proliferative marker Ki67 in colorectal cancer patients was also confirmed and consistent with PCNA expression in tumor cells studied in vitro as well as a previous study in CRC patients [22]. This suggests that the data from the current case series are suitable for analysis of the clinical significance of HMGB1. Although HMGB1 showed no association with TNM staging and metastasis, it did correlate with poor prognosis (p = 0.0281) and is a predictive marker for poor prognosis according to multivariate analysis. Based on the histological study and in vitro study, we propose that both apoptosis and necrosis play an important role in tumor progression, and both CC3 and HMGB1 are predictive markers of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients.

Repopulation describes the phenomenon that surviving tumor cells after radiotherapy reestablish and form a new tumor [28]. However, the underlying mechanism has not been fully elucidated. It could be caused by proliferation from lightly injured tumor cells as a result of heterogeneous reaction to radiation or living tumor cells that migrated beyond the radiated field. The results from our study suggested that apoptotic and necrotic cells could stimulate proliferation of the living tumor cells. The HMGB1 released from dying cells could be a new marker to predict the possibility of tumor repopulation. This may also represent a new mechanism of tumor repopulation.

In conclusion, repopulation is one of the main obstacles hindering successful cancer treatment. The apoptotic or necrotic cells can stimulate growth of living tumor cells and subsequently mediate the relapse of colorectal cancer after radiotherapy. The increased expression of the key factors of apoptosis or necrosis such as CC3 and HMGB1 in tumor could be a new marker for poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Comprehensive Cancer Center & Shanghai Key Laboratory for Pancreatic Diseases, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
(2)
The Department of Surgery, The Branch Hospital of Shanghai General Hospital
(3)
Experimental Research Center, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
(4)
Department of Dermatology, Medical Center, Duke University

References

  1. Niero EL, Rocha-Sales B, Lauand C, Cortez BA, de Souza MM, Rezende-Teixeira P, et al. The multiple facets of drug resistance: one history, different approaches. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33:37. doi:10.1186/1756-9966-33-37.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng J, Tian L, Ma J, Gong Y, Zhang Z, Chen Z, et al. Dying tumor cells stimulate proliferation of living tumor cells via caspase-dependent protein kinase Cdelta activation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2015;9(1):105–14. doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.024.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Huang Q, Li F, Liu X, Li W, Shi W, Liu FF, et al. Caspase 3-mediated stimulation of tumor cell repopulation during cancer radiotherapy. Nat Med. 2011;17(7):860–6. doi:10.1038/nm.2385.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kurtova AV, Xiao J, Mo Q, Pazhanisamy S, Krasnow R, Lerner SP, et al. Blocking PGE2-induced tumour repopulation abrogates bladder cancer chemoresistance. Nature. 2015;517(7533):209–13. doi:10.1038/nature14034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ford CA, Petrova S, Pound JD, Voss JJ, Melville L, Paterson M, et al. Oncogenic properties of apoptotic tumor cells in aggressive B cell lymphoma. Curr Biol. 2015;25(5):577–88. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.059.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kono K, Mimura K, Kiessling R. Immunogenic tumor cell death induced by chemoradiotherapy: molecular mechanisms and a clinical translation. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e688. doi:10.1038/cddis.2013.207.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ulloa L, Messmer D. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein: friend and foe. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006;17(3):189–201. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2006.01.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sims GP, Rowe DC, Rietdijk ST, Herbst R, Coyle AJ. HMGB1 and RAGE in inflammation and cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 2010;28:367–88. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hori O, Brett J, Slattery T, Cao R, Zhang J, Chen JX, et al. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a cellular binding site for amphoterin. Mediation of neurite outgrowth and co-expression of rage and amphoterin in the developing nervous system. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(43):25752–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sorci G, Riuzzi F, Giambanco I, Donato R. RAGE in tissue homeostasis, repair and regeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833(1):101–9. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.10.021.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu W, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Chen X, Guo S, Lei Y, et al. HMGB1-mediated autophagy modulates sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to oxaliplatin via MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015:0. doi:10.1080/15384047.2015.1017691.Google Scholar
  12. Pan B, Chen D, Huang J, Wang R, Feng B, Song H, et al. HMGB1-mediated autophagy promotes docetaxel resistance in human lung adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:165. doi:10.1186/1476-4598-13-165.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuniyasu H, Oue N, Wakikawa A, Shigeishi H, Matsutani N, Kuraoka K, et al. Expression of receptors for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) is closely associated with the invasive and metastatic activity of gastric cancer. J Pathol. 2002;196(2):163–70. doi:10.1002/path.1031.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sasahira T, Akama Y, Fujii K, Kuniyasu H. Expression of receptor for advanced glycation end products and HMGB1/amphoterin in colorectal adenomas. Virchows Arch. 2005;446(4):411–5. doi:10.1007/s00428-005-1210-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hongo K, Kazama S, Tsuno NH, Ishihara S, Sunami E, Kitayama J, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of high-mobility group box 1 correlates with resistance of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13(1):7. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-13-7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahmood T, Yang PC. Western blot: technique, theory, and trouble shooting. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(9):429–34. doi:10.4103/1947-2714.100998.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rasband WS. ImageJ. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij; 1997–2014.
  18. Sawai H, Domae N. Discrimination between primary necrosis and apoptosis by necrostatin-1 in Annexin V-positive/propidium iodide-negative cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;411(3):569–73. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Challa S, Chan FK. Going up in flames: necrotic cell injury and inflammatory diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67(19):3241–53. doi:10.1007/s00018-010-0413-8.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Compton C, Byrd D, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kurtzman S, Olawaiye A, Washington M. Colon and rectum. In: Compton CC, Byrd DR, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kurtzman SH, Olawaiye A, Washington MK, editors. AJCC cancer staging atlas. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 185–201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin L, Zhong K, Sun Z, Wu G, Ding G. Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) partially mediates HMGB1-ERKs activation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138(1):11–22. doi:10.1007/s00432-011-1067-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Shepherd NA, Richman PI, England J. Ki-67 derived proliferative activity in colorectal adenocarcinoma with prognostic correlations. J Pathol. 1988;155(3):213–9. doi:10.1002/path.1711550306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Allegra CJ, Paik S, Colangelo LH, Parr AL, Kirsch I, Kim G, et al. Prognostic value of thymidylate synthase, Ki-67, and p53 in patients with Dukes’ B and C colon cancer: a National Cancer Institute-National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project collaborative study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(2):241–50. doi:10.1200/jco.2003.05.044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Huebener P, Pradere JP, Hernandez C, Gwak GY, Caviglia JM, Mu X, et al. The HMGB1/RAGE axis triggers neutrophil-mediated injury amplification following necrosis. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(2):539–50. doi:10.1172/JCI76887.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Thorburn J, Horita H, Redzic J, Hansen K, Frankel AE, Thorburn A. Autophagy regulates selective HMGB1 release in tumor cells that are destined to die. Cell Death Differ. 2008;16(1):175–83. doi:10.1038/cdd.2008.143.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Stoimenov I, Helleday T. PCNA on the crossroad of cancer. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37(Pt 3):605–13. doi:10.1042/BST0370605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kang R, Zhang Q, Zeh 3rd HJ, Lotze MT, Tang D. HMGB1 in cancer: good, bad, or both? Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(15):4046–57. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0495.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu X, Liu W, Cao Q, Che C, Chen Z, Xu Z, et al. Inhibition of Aurora B by CCT137690 sensitizes colorectal cells to radiotherapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33:13. doi:10.1186/1756-9966-33-13.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement