Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Parvimonas micra activates the Ras/ERK/c-Fos pathway by upregulating miR-218-5p to promote colorectal cancer progression

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research volume 42, Article number: 13 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world, and a strong relationship exists between CRC and gut microbiota, which affects the occurrence, development, and metastasis of cancer. Bioinformatics-based analyses revealed that the abundance of Parvimonas micra (P. micra) in the feces of patients with cancer is significantly higher than that in healthy people. Therefore, an important relationship may exist between P. micra and CRC.

Methods

We first confirmed that P. micra can promote the proliferation of cell lines through cell experiments and mouse models. Then we selected the signaling pathways and content of exosomes to promote the development of CRC by transcriptomics and microRNA sequencing. Finally, we confirmed that P. micra promoted CRC development through miR-218-5p/Ras/ERK/c-Fos pathway through the in vivo and in vitro experiments.

Results

First, it was confirmed by in vitro and in vivo experiments that P. micra can promote the development of CRC. Transcriptome analysis after the coincubation of bacteria and cells revealed that P. micra promoted cell proliferation by activating the Ras/ERK/c-Fos pathway. Furthermore, microRNA sequencing analysis of the cells and exosomes showed that miR-218-5p and protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor R (PTPRR) were the key factors involved in activating the Ras/ERK/c-Fos pathway, and the miR-218-5p inhibitor was used to confirm the role of microRNA in xenograft mice.

Conclusion

This experiment confirmed that P. micra promoted the development of CRC by upregulating miR-218-5p expression in cells and exosomes, inhibiting PTPRR expression, and ultimately activating the Ras/ERK/c-Fos signaling pathway.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world and tends to affect younger individuals. The morbidity of CRC in people under 50 years of age is rising rapidly [1, 2]. Many factors affect the occurrence of CRC, such as external environment, diet, genetic factors, internal immune, and gut microbiota [3, 4]. However, the pathogenesis of CRC is unclear. The gut microbiota is closely related to CRC. In addition to Fusobacterium nucleatum, Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis, and PKS+ Escherichia coli, which have been confirmed earlier [5,6,7], in recent years, various bacteria, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, and Clostridium difficile have been confirmed to be associated with CRC [8,9,10].

P. micra is an oral opportunistic pathogen, which occurs frequently in oral diseases. P. micra can form biofilms by itself, and can also assist other pathogens in forming biofilms, leading to inflammation or disease [11, 12]. In recent years, it has been found that P. micra is not only an oral opportunistic pathogen, but also may be closely related to CRC. Many bioinformatics-based studies have reported that P. micra is closely involved in CRC [13,14,15], and can be used as a marker for CRC diagnosis [16, 17]. However, the relationship between P. micra and CRC has not been confirmed experimentally.

MicroRNA is a family of RNAs that can negatively regulate the expression of genes. The main function of microRNAs is to regulate the expression of genes related to growth, development, and disease occurrence and development. MicroRNAs play an important role in cardiovascular disease, diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and many other diseases, especially tumors. In CRC, specific microRNAs may play important roles in bacteria-promoting cancer development [18, 19]. Functional differences between different tumor types and cancer stages were associated with microRNAs expression. Alterations in microRNA expression are associated with the expression of genes essential for cell proliferation or survival, leading to tumor formation. For example, overexpression of miR-494 induced Wnt/β-catenin signaling by targeting APC, thus promoting CRC cell growth [20]. Moreover, some can be used as biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of metastasis in patients with CRC [21]. In this study, we confirmed that P. micra can promote the development of CRC in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, P. micra can regulate the production and secretion of miR-218-5p, and then promote the development of CRC through the Ras/ERK/c-Fos pathway. These findings provide diagnostic and therapeutic targets for treating CRC.

Methods

Sample

Bacterial strains

Culture samples (colorectal cancer mucosal tissues) were taken from the Beijing Shijitan Hospital. Isolation and culture were performed as described [22]. A strain of Parvimonas micra was isolated from the sample and named Pm-42. DH5α strain were purchase from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

Colorectal cancer mucosa and adjacent normal tissue

The 22 patients with CRC included in this study were from Shijitan Hospital, Beijing. We took 2 cm2 colorectal cancer mucosal tissue and adjacent normal tissue samples, at least 5 cm away from the cancerous tissue.

Cell lines

LoVo and HT-29 cells were purchased from Beina Biological Co., Ltd. (Henan, China) .

Cell counting

LoVo or HT-29 cells were seeded into a 24-well plate. A total of 1 × 104 cells per well were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h in 5% CO2. Then, Pm-42 or DH5α strains were added to the plate at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. The plates were incubated in an anaerobic incubator for 2 h and then at 37 °C for 24 and 48 h in 5% CO2. The cells seeded in the wells were counted with a cell counter (Invitrogen, Countess 3 FL). PBS was used as a blank control.

MTT cell proliferation assay

LoVo or HT-29 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate. A total of 2 × 104 cells per well were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h in 5% CO2; Pm-42 or DH5α cells were added to the plate at an MOI of 10, that is, 2 × 105 per well. To evaluate proliferation, the MTT cell proliferation and cytotoxicity assay kit (Solarbio, M1020) was used 24 and 48 h after the coincubation, and absorbance was detected at 490 nm. PBS was used as a blank control.

Real-time cell analysis (RTCA)

A total of 2 × 104 LoVo or HT-29 cells were seeded into the wells of a plate. After 8 h, Pm-42 or DH5α was added to the well at an MOI of 10. The plate was placed on the machine for 48 h. PBS was used as a blank control.

Animal experiments

Xenograft model

We purchased 6-week-old female nude mice from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology (Beijing, China). LoVo or HT-29 cells were incubated with Pm-42 or DH5α strains at an MOI of 10 for 24 h. The cells were collected and washed three times with PBS, mixed with Pm-42 or DH5α at an MOI of 1:1, and injected subcutaneously into nude mice. The number of cells administered to each mouse was 3 × 106 cells/mouse. Three hours after the injection, the mice were given an intraperitoneal injection of piperacillin antibiotic therapy (150 mg/kg body weight). PBS was used as a blank control. Body weight and tumor volume were subsequently measured every two days. On the 24th day after modeling, the mice were killed and the blood was taken, and then the serum was extracted for cytokine detection. Cytokines were detected with the Bio-Plex 200® system (Bio-Rad, United States).

Tumor-bearing nude mice treated with the antagomir (GenePharma, China) were subcutaneously injected with cells using the same protocol. After nine days of cell injection, 5 nmol antagomir was injected locally into the tumor every three days for a total of five injections. Body weight and tumor volume were measured every two days throughout the experiment.

P. micra gavage administration in APCMin/+ mice

APCMin/+ mice were 5-week-old females purchased from GemPharmatech Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Mice were fed streptomycin (2 mg/mL) in water for three days before gavage. Mice were given 109 CFU bacteria once a day by gavage for 12 weeks. Blood and feces were collected at the midpoint or endpoint of gavage. Serum biochemistry was performed using a biochemical detector (Beckman Coulter, AU480), and cytokines were detected with the Bio-Plex 200® system (Bio-Rad, United States).

Pathological and immunohistochemical detection

Fresh tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for over 24 h. Tissues were embedded in paraffin. For pathological detection, the paraffin-embedded colonic sections (5 μm thick) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For immunohistochemical (IHC) detection, the sections were stained with anti-ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4695 T), anti-c-Fos (Abcam, ab222699), and anti-PTPRR (Abcam, ab180134) antibodies.

Cells transcriptome sequencing

LoVo cells were incubated with Pm-42 or PBS for 48 h at an MOI of 10. After incubation, the cells were collected, and washed three times with PBS. Cellular RNA was extracted with the PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, 12183018a). The RNA samples were sent to Novogene Biological Technology Company (Beijing, China) for transcriptome sequencing. Raw data were uploaded to GenBank (BioProject PRJNA859257).

Cells microRNA sequencing

HT-29 cells were incubated with Pm-42 or PBS for 48 h at an MOI of 10. After incubation, the cells were collected and washed three times with PBS. Cellular RNA was extracted by using Trizol (Ambion, 15,596,026). Finally, the RNA samples were sent to Novogene Biological Technology Company (Beijing, China) for microRNA sequencing. Raw data were uploaded to GenBank (BioProject PRJNA859413 and PRJNA859414).

Cell exosomes sequencing

HT-29 cells were cultured for 24 h. The medium was replaced with serum-free media. The cells were incubated with Pm-42 or PBS at an MOI of 10 for 48 h. Cell supernatants were collected, and exosomes were extracted using the Extracellular vesicle extraction kit (Raojing Gene, China), followed by RNA extraction with the miRNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, 217004). Library construction was performed with the NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA Sample Prep Set for Illumina (NE, E7300). Raw data were uploaded to GenBank (BioProject PRJNA859256).

DNA extraction and 16S rDNA sequencing of mice feces

Fresh feces were collected from mice at the end of gavage. DNA was extracted from feces by using the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA kit (QIAGEN, 51804). The extracted DNA was sent to Novogene Biological Technology Company (Beijing, China) for 16S rDNA sequencing. Raw data were uploaded to GenBank (BioProject PRJNA859250).

Western blot

Total protein of cells or tissues was separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The proteins in SDS-PAGE were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore). The membrane was incubated first with primary antibodies and then with secondary antibodies. The primary and secondary antibodies used are as follows: anti-Ras (Abcam, ab108602), anti-ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4695 T), anti-p-ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4370 T), anti-c-Fos (Abcam, ab222699), anti-PTPRR (Abcam, ab180134), anti-β-actin (Ray antibody, EM2001), and a fluorescent secondary antibody (LICOR, 926–32,211 and 926–32,210). The band intensity ratio of the target protein to β-actin was calculated. Fold change = (target protein/β-actin)/mean value of the band intensity ratio in the blank group. The experiment was performed in three independent replicates.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Cell samples were directly collected and washed with PBS three times. Mucosal tissue samples were homogenized (HODER, China). RNA was extracted with the Trizol reagent. Mucosal tissues were homogenized and treated with lysozyme (Thermo Scientific, 89,833) for four hours. Total DNA was extracted with the QIAamp DNA mini Kit (QIAGEN, 51306). Total RNA, containing mRNAs and microRNAs, was converted to cDNA using reverse transcription reagents (Vazyme, R323–01 and MR101–01) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. qPCR-based detection of P. micra, mRNA and microRNA was performed using SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Q511–02) in the LightCycler 480 II Real-Time PCR System (Roch, Switzerland). Data were presented as fold change using the 2-△△CT method. Primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table 1.

Transfection of plasmid, mimics, inhibitor, and negative control into the cells

Cells were seeded into wells and transfected with the pcDNA3.1(+)-hPTPRR or pcDNA3.1(+) using a transfection reagent (Vazyme, T101–01), or transfected with the mimics, inhibitor, or negative control (NC) using a transfection reagent (Polyplus, 101,000,028). Bacteria were added for coincubation using the method used in MTT cell proliferation assay, 24 h after transfection.

Prediction of the miR-218-5p target genes and the binding sites to the target genes

Target genes were screened using a target gene prediction database. The starBase database integrates the prediction results of seven databases to predict microRNA target genes (https://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/). Target genes predicted in ≥ 4 databases are screened out. The binding sites for miR-218-5p and protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor R (PTPRR) were predicted using TargetScan (https://www.targetscan.org/).

Luciferase reporter assay

To construct the dual luciferase plasmid, we cloned: 1) the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of the target site (of the target gene corresponding to the microRNA) and its adjacent sequences into the pmirGlo vector as the wild type and 2) mutated 3′-UTR target site (of the target gene corresponding to the microRNA) into the pmirGlo vector as the mutant type. HT-29 or LoVo cells were cultured in 12-well plates until the cell density reached ~ 60%. The cells were cotransfected with the pmirGlo plasmid and mimics or mimics negative control using a transfection reagent (Vazyme, T101–01), and the luciferase assay was performed using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Vazyme, DL101–01) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Relative luciferase activity = (Firefly/Renilla) / mean (Firefly/Renilla) of the mimics NC.

The Cancer genome atlas database analysis

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is a project overseen by the National Cancer Institute and the National Human Genome Research Institute to apply high-throughput genome analysis techniques to help understand cancer (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). We used the Xiantao academic (https://www.xiantao.love/) to search the TCGA database for transcriptome sequencing and microRNA sequencing data related to colorectal cancer and to analyze the data and prepare figures. Screened TCGA database ID numbers can be found in Supplemental Table 2.

Statistical analysis

For comparisons between multiple sets of data, the normality and homogeneity of variance of each data set were first confirmed. If the data were distributed normally and showed homogeneity of variance, analysis of variance (ANOVA) or two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test was used, whereas if they were not normally distributed or showed heterogeneity of variance, a rank-sum test was used (P < 0.05). For the comparison of P. micra abundance and genes (or microRNA) expression in tumor and adjacent normal tissues, a paired T test was used for statistical analysis. P. micra abundance and gene (or microRNA) expression were statistically calculated using Spearmans’s correlation analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments. All P values were 2-tailed and P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). All statistical analyses were done using the SPSS Statistics 20.0 software.

Results

P. micra promotes CRC proliferation in the cell lines and xenograft animal model

We selected two CRC epithelial cell lines, LoVo and HT-29. DH5α has been used as a negative control in many in vitro experiments demonstrating the relationship between bacteria and colorectal cancer [18, 23]. Therefore, cells were infected with Pm-42 and DH-5α for 24 and 48 h. Pm-42 significantly stimulated cell proliferation compared with other groups (Fig. 1A). Results from the MTT assay were similar (Fig. 1B). RTCA was used to evaluate the effects of Pm-42 on epithelial cells, and the results were consistent with the cell count and MTT assays (Fig. 1C). Next, we used a xenograft model in nude mice to confirm that P. micra can promote the proliferation of CRC cells in vivo. The results showed that the tumor volume of the Pm-42 group was significantly higher than that of the other two groups. No significant difference was observed between the DH5α and blank groups (Fig. 1D, Figure1E and Supplemental Fig. 1A). There was also a significant difference in tumor weight between the Pm-42 group and the other two groups (Fig. 1F); however, no significant difference was present in the spleen index (Supplemental Fig. 1B). Furthermore, evaluation of 17 types of cytokines in mice sera revealed that levels of IL-6, TNF-α, IL-12p70, GM-CSF, and IL-27 in the Pm-42 group were significantly higher than those in the other two groups (Fig. 1G). These results suggest that P. micra can promote the proliferation of CRC cells.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Parvimonas micra promotes cancer cell proliferation. A–C Detection of P. micra promoting cancer cell line proliferation through cell counting, MTT assay, and real-time cell analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments. D–G LoVo cells treated with Pm-42, DH5α, or PBS were subcutaneously injected into male BALB/C nude mice to produce xenograft tumors in animals. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 5. D Images of xenograft mice. E The change of tumor size in xenograft mice. F The weight of tumor in xenograft mice. G The detection of 17 cytokines in the sera of xenograft mice

Full size image

P. micra promotes tumor proliferation and alters the gut microbiota in APCMin/+ mice

APCMin/+ mice are commonly used as intestinal tumor models. We used APCMin/+ mice to perform the P. micra gavage experiment. The mice were first given antibiotic–water (streptomycin) for three days, and then Pm-42 at 1 × 109 CFU or PBS by gavage daily for the next 12 weeks. Feces were collected at the end of gavage, and blood was collected at the midpoint and endpoint (Fig. 2A). Both anatomical results (Fig. 2B) and results from the analysis of tumor volume, tumor number, and colon length (Fig. 2C) revealed that the Pm-42 group had significantly more serious phenotypes than the blank group. Pathological results showed that the epithelial cells of the colon mucosa in the Pm-42 group were atrophic, necrotic, and exfoliated; the glands were incomplete; and inflammatory cells infiltration was more extensive (Fig. 2D). Blood biochemistry results revealed that in the Pm-42 group, levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatinine (Cr), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were significantly higher than those in the blank group (Fig. 2E). Cytokine analysis revealed that in the Pm-42 group, TNF-α was significantly higher than that in the blank group after 6-weeks of gavage (Fig. 2F), in the Pm-42 group, IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly higher than those in the blank group at the end of 12-weeks of gavage (Fig. 2G). The level of cytokines at 12-weeks was higher than that at 6-weeks, indicating that inflammation was continuously increasing.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Parvimonas micra promotes colorectal cancer in APCMin/+ mice. A APCMin/+ mice were administrated with P. micra or PBS for 12 weeks, and fecal collection was performed at the end of gavage. Blood was collected at the midpoint and endpoint of gavage. B Representative images of APCMin/+ mice colon. C Changes in tumor size, tumor number, and colon length in APCMin/+ mice. D Representative images of colon pathology. E Serum biochemical assay of APCMin/+ mice. F Serum cytokine detection in mice at midpoint (6 weeks). G Serum cytokine detection in mice at endpoint (12 weeks). H Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis of the gut microbiota with 16S rDNA sequencing. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 11

Full size image

To observe changes in the gut microbiota, at the end of gavage we collected feces from APCMin/+ mice and performed sequencing. In terms of abundance composition at the genus level, a significant difference between the Pm-42 and blank groups was observed (Supplemental Fig. 2A and B), and as seen in the Wayne diagram, the unique species between the two groups accounted for 50.9% and 31.8% of the total species in each group, respectively (Supplemental Fig. 2C). In terms of β-diversity, results from principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed a significant difference between the two groups (Supplemental Fig. 2D). In addition, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis identified 14 differential bacteria, including Parvimonas, at the genus level in the Pm-42 group (Fig. 2H). Of these, Prevotellaceae, Streptococcus, Klebsiella, and Streptomyces are positively associated with gastrointestinal inflammation or cancer [24,25,26,27]. The results of the Metastat analysis were consistent with LEfSe (Supplemental Fig. 3A and B). In addition, we verified the abundance of P. micra in the two groups by qPCR, which showed no difference between the two groups before the experiment and a significant difference between the two groups after the experiment (Supplemental Fig. 3C and D). Taken together, these results suggest that P. micra can colonize the gut and change the composition of the gut microbiota.

P. micra promotes tumor proliferation through the Ras/ERK/c-Fos signaling pathway

We incubated P. micra with cells at an MOI of 10 for 48 h, and then collected the cells for cell transcriptome sequencing analysis. Compared with the blank group, more up- and downregulated genes were present in the Pm-42 group (Supplemental Fig. 4A and B). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed for the up- and downregulated genes (Fig. 3A and Supplemental Fig. 4C). In the up-regulated genes of Pm-42 group compared with the blank group, 14 significant differential signal KEGG pathways were found. The top three with the most significant differences included ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, cell cycle, and colorectal cancer signaling (Fig. 3 A). We calculated and ranked the fold change of genes with significant differences in the three pathways. Colorectal cancer signaling had the largest difference between the Pm-42 and blank groups (Supplemental Fig. 4D). We then classified the genes that were significantly upregulated in the colorectal cancer pathway. Among them, the most significantly upregulated genes were clustered in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway (Fig. 3B). Therefore, we hypothesized that P. micra promotes tumor cell proliferation through the MAPK pathway. The cells and bacteria were coincubated, and the key proteins of MAPK pathway were detected. Levels of Ras, ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, and c-Fos were significantly higher in the Pm-42 group than in the DH5α and blank groups (Fig. 3C and Supplemental Fig. 5A). Similarly, we also verified this in APCMin/+ mouse intestinal tissue, and the results were consistent in vivo and in vitro (Supplemental Fig. 5B and C). Then the ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059 was used to inhibit the Ras/ERK/c-Fos pathway. Results showed that the difference in protein levels disappeared after inhibitor addition (Fig. 3D and Supplemental Fig. 6). Thus, P. micra can promote the proliferation of tumor cells through the Ras/ERK/c-Fos pathway. Finally, we verified the disappearance of cell proliferation difference in the presence of the PD98059 inhibitor using the MTT assay (Fig. 3E and F), which further indicated that P. micra promotes tumor cell proliferation through the activation of the Ras/ERK/c-Fos signaling pathway.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Parvimonas micra regulate the MAPK signaling pathway. A Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis of the upregulated genes in the Pm-42 group. B Classification of upregulated genes in the Pm-42 group in the colorectal cancer signaling pathway. C After cells and bacteria were coincubated, Ras, ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, and c-Fos were detected through western blotting. D Coincubation of the cells and bacteria in the presence of the PD98059 inhibitor and detection of Ras, ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, and c-Fos through western blotting. E–F DMSO or PD98059 inhibitors were added to the coincubated cells and bacteria; the MTT assay was used to detect cell proliferation. Data are expressed as mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments

Full size image

Screening for related microRNAs of P. micra promoting CRC development

MicroRNA is an important factor in the development of cancer, and plays an important role in the regulation of signaling pathways. Therefore, we performed cellular and exosomal microRNA sequencing analysis after the coincubation of P. micra and cells. There were significant differences in Colorectal cancer, Pathways in cancer and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway in KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differential microRNA target genes, indicating that differential microRNA expression and CRC may be closely linked (Supplemental Fig. 7). Cellular and exosomal microRNA analysis revealed the presence of hundreds of microRNAs significantly up- or downregulated between the Pm-42 and blank groups (Supplemental Tables 3 and 4); however, only six microRNAs were significantly up- or downregulated in both cellular and exosomal microRNA sequencing (Fig. 4A). We analyzed the six microRNAs and screened out microRNAs with |log2| greater than two in both cellular and exosomal sequencing. Finally, one microRNA, miR-218-5p, was found to be significantly upregulated in both the cells and exosomes (Fig. 4A). We used qPCR to detect the abundance of miR-218-5p after coincubation of bacteria and cells. The results showed that miR-218-5p levels in the Pm-42 group were significantly higher than that in the DH5α and blank groups (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

miR-218-5p is upregulated in both cellular and exosomal fractions. A Compared to the blank group, six microRNAs were up- or downregulated in both the cells and exosomes of the Pm-42 group. B qPCR detection of miR-218-5p in the cells after coincubation with Pm-42, DH5α, or PBS. Data are expressed as mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments

Full size image

P. micra regulates the expression of miR-218-5p and its target gene PTPRR

We confirmed that the Ras/ERK/c-Fos signal pathway plays an important role in P. micra promoting CRC development. Moreover, microRNA sequencing results revealed that miR-218-5p was highly expressed both in cells and exosomes. Using starBase, a database which contains seven micorRNA target genes, we looked for target genes of miR-218-5p. First, we determined the target genes present in ≥4 databases in the starBase (ENCORI) database, and then screened target genes related to the MAPK signal pathway. We finally screened out the protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type R (PTPRR) (Fig. 5A). PTPRR can dephosphorylate p-ERK, thus inhibiting the MAPK pathway [28]. We used qPCR to detect the abundance of PTPRR after coincubation of bacteria and cells and found that PTPRR level was significantly lower in the Pm-42 group than that in the DH5α and blank groups (Fig. 5B). At the protein level, PTPRR expression in the Pm-42 group was significantly lower than that in the DH5α or blank groups (Fig. 5C and Supplemental Fig. 8A). We used qPCR and the luciferase reporter gene assay to verify the relationship between miR-218-5p and PTPRR. After transfecting with mimicss or inhibitors, the differences between Pm-42, DH5α, and the blank group disappeared, whereas PTPRR expression was significantly higher in cells transfected with inhibitors compared with transfected mimics (Fig. 5D and Supplemental Fig. 8B). These results indicated a negative correlation between miR-218-5p and PTPRR. The presence of difference in the negative control group indicates that the negative control group of inhibitors and mimics has no effect on the target gene. The binding sites of miR-218-5p and PTPRR were predicted using TargetScan, and dual luciferase plasmids and mutants containing PTPRR binding sequences were constructed (Fig. 5E). The miR-218-5p mimics (or miR-218-5p mimics negative control) and plasmid were cotransfected into HT-29 and LoVo cells to observe the interaction. The detection value of the wild type plasmid was significantly lower than that of the negative control group, whereas the mutation group showed no significant differences (Fig. 5F), which further indicated that an interactive relationship between miR-218-5p and PTPRR. Finally, we transfected the plasmid (pcDNA3.1(+)-hPTPRR) highly expressing the PTPRR protein in the cell lines, and then infected the cells with the Pm-42, DH5α strains to examine the cell proliferation and mRNA expression of the Ras/ERK/c-Fos signaling pathway. The results showed that the differences in cell proliferation (Fig. 5G and H) and mRNA expression (Supplemental Fig. 8C) among the three groups disappeared, indicating the important role of PTPRR protein in activating the Ras/ERK/c-Fos signaling pathway to promote cell proliferation mechanism by P. micra.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor R (PTPRR) is a target of miR-218-5p. A A schematic diagram for screening Parvimonas micra-regulated microRNAs and target genes. B qPCR detection of the PTPRR in the cells after coincubation with Pm-42, DH5α, or PBS. C Western blot detection of PTPRR in the cells after coincubation with Pm-42, DH5α, or PBS. D The mimics, inhibitor, or negative control (NC) of miR-218-5p were transfected into LoVo cells and coincubated with Pm-42, DH5α, or PBS. Then PTPRR was detected through qPCR. E The binding sites of miR-218-5p and PTPRR were predicted using TargetScan; dual luciferase plasmids and mutants containing PTPRR binding sequences were constructed. F miR-218-5p binding to PTPRR was detected using the luciferase reporter gene assay. G–H pcDNA3.1(+)-hPTPRR or pcDNA3.1(+) vectors were transfected into LoVo or HT-29 cells, then coincubated with bacteria; the MTT assay was used to detect cell proliferation. Data are expressed as mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments

Full size image

The role of miR-218-5p in the development of CRC is promoted by P. micra

To further verify the role of miR-218-5p in the promotion of CRC development by P. micra, we transfected the cell lines and animal models with the miR-218-5p inhibitor. Results from the MTT assay in LoVo and HT-29 cells showed that the addition of miR-218-5p mimics alone significantly promoted cell proliferation compared with the negative control and blank groups (Fig. 6 A and Supplemental Fig. 9A). Simultaneously, the use of the miR-218-5p inhibitor could significantly block the proliferation effect induced by Pm-42 (Fig. 6B and Supplemental Fig. 9B). The in vitro results showed that miR-218-5p was an important factor for P. micra in promoting cell proliferation. Next, we performed the xenograft model experiment in nude mice. We injected 6-week-old female nude mice subcutaneously with LoVo or HT-29 cells infected with Pm-42, DH5α, or PBS. The tumor site was locally injected with the miR-218-5p inhibitor (antagomir) nine days after inoculation, once every three days for a total of five injections (Fig. 6C). The size and weight of the tumor were noted. The results revealed that after the injection of the antagomir, the difference between Pm-42 and the other two groups (DH-5α and blank) disappeared, whether in gross observation, the tumor size and tumor weight (Figs. 6D-F and Supplemental Fig. 9C). In addition, we detected no significant differences in the 17 cytokines evaluated in mice sera between the three groups (Fig. 6G). IHC detection of ERK1/2, c-Fos, and PTPRR was performed on the tumor tissues of the two xenograft model experiments. Without the antagomir, ERK1/2 and c-Fos expression in the Pm-42 group was significantly higher than that in the DH5α and blank groups, and PTPRR was lower than the two groups, whereas the difference disappeared after using the antagomir (Fig. 6H, Supplemental Fig. 9D-F). Similar to IHC results, western blot analysis revealed that levels of Ras, ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, and c-Fos significantly increased, whereas that of PTPRR significantly decreased in the Pm-42 group. However, the difference disappeared when the mice were injected with the antagomir (Fig. 6I and Supplemental Fig. 10A-C). These results suggest that P. micra promotes the development of CRC by upregulating the transcription of miR-218-5p, inhibiting the expression of PTPRR, and then activating the Ras/ERK/c-Fos signaling pathway.

Fig. 6
figure 6

miR-218-5p inhibitor recovered phenotypes of mice induced by Parvimonas micra. A The mimics, inhibitor, or negative control (NC) of miR-218-5p was transfected into LoVo cells, and the MTT assay was used to detect cell proliferation. B The miR-218-5p inhibitor, miR-218-5p inhibitor negative control, or RNase free ddH2O was added into LoVo cells and then coincubated with Pm-42, and the MTT assay was used to detect cell proliferation. Data are expressed as mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments. C LoVo or HT-29 cells treated with Pm-42, DH5α, or PBS were subcutaneously injected into male BALB/C nude mice to produce xenograft tumors in animals. After nine days of cell injection, the antagomir was injected locally into the tumor every three days for a total of five injections. D–G LoVo cells treated with Pm-42, DH5α, or PBS were subcutaneously injected into male BALB/C nude mice to produce xenograft tumors in animals. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 5. D Images of xenograft mice. E The change of tumor size in xenograft mice. F The weight of tumor in xenograft mice. G The detection of 17 cytokines in the serum of xenograft mice. H Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the PTPRR levels in xenograft mice of LoVo cells. I Western blotting was used to detect Ras, ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, c-Fos and PTPRR in the xenograft mice of LoVo cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments

Full size image

In CRC tissues, the high expression of miR-218-5p is associated with a high abundance of P. micra, indicating poor clinical prognosis

To further verify our conclusions from clinical data, we collected 44 samples of CRC mucosa and adjacent normal tissues from 22 patients with CRC, and detected an abundance of P. micra, miR-218-5p, and PTPRR expression using qPCR. The abundance of P. micra in cancer tissue was significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissue (Fig. 7A). Moreover, the expression of miR-218-5p was significantly increased (Fig. 7B), whereas that of PTPRR was decreased (Fig. 7C). These results indicate an important role between P. micra, miR-218-5p, and PTPRR in the development of CRC. We further evaluated the association between P. micra and miR-218-5p and miR-218-5p and PTPRR. Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between P. micra and miR-218-5p (Fig. 7D) and a significant negative correlation between miR-218-5 and PTPRR (Fig. 7E). We analyzed the clinical outcomes associated with miR-218-5p and PTPRR using another database from TCGA and found significant differences between miR-218-5p and PTPRR in both cancer mucosa and adjacent normal tissues of pan-cancer (Supplemental Fig. 11A and B). Regarding CRC data, the differences in the abundance of miR-218-5p and PTPRR in both cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues (Supplemental Fig. 11C and D) were consistent with our data. The survival rates of patients with high miR-218-5p in clinical TNM stage T4 were significantly reduced (Fig. 7F), and the expression of miR-218-5p in patients with T1–T4 staging showed a significantly increasing trend (Fig. 7G). We also evaluated the expression of miR-218-5p and PTPRR in patients with pathological stages I–IV. The expression of miR-218-5p in patients with pathologic stages II–IV was significantly higher than that in patients with pathologic stage I (Fig. 7H), whereas the expression of PTPRR was not significantly different between pathologic stages I–IV (Supplemental Fig. 11E). In addition, the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 98% for miR-218-5p (Fig. 7I) and 84% for PTPRR (Supplemental Fig. 11F), indicating that miR-218-5p and PTPRR may be used as a target for the clinical detection of CRC. The information and description statistics of the samples collected in this experiment and those collected from public databases are shown in Supplemental Table 5. Thus, these clinical data show that miR-218-5p plays an important role in the development of P. micra-induced CRC.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Analysis of clinical data indicates the potential diagnostic role of miR-218-5p in colorectal cancer. A–C Comparison of miR-218-5p, PTPRR expression, and Parvimonas micra abundance in cancer mucosa (C) and adjacent normal tissues (N). D–E Correlation analysis between P. micra abundance and miR-218-5p or miR-218-5p and PTPRR expression. F Survival rates of high- and low-expressing miR-218-5p in stage T4 samples from the TCGA data. G Expression of miR-218-5p in stages T1–T4 in the TCGA data. H Expression of miR-218-5p in pathological stages I–IV in the TCGA data. I ROC curve for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer based on miR-218-5p

Full size image

Discussion

CRC is one of the most common tumors in the world. Several studies have shown that the gut microbiota is closely related to CRC. Earlier studies have shown that the transplantation of feces from patients with CRC into germ-free mice can promote the development of CRC in mice, thus confirming that carcinogenic bacteria may exist in the flora of patients with CRC [29]. In recent years, some bacteria have been confirmed to be associated with CRC, such as ST11 Streptococcus pneumoniae, which can promote the development of CRC by changing the immune microenvironment [26]. Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes CRC by activating the NLRP3 inflammasome [8].

P. micra is an oral opportunistic pathogen that is closely related to periodontitis and other diseases; moreover, it can cause purulent infections of systemic organs [30, 31]. Bioinformatics analysis showed that the abundance of P. micra in patients with CRC was significantly higher than that in healthy people [32, 33]. Further studies evaluated the abundance of P. micra from the perspective of the development of polyps, adenocarcinomas, and other cancers, and speculated that it played an important role in promoting the development of cancer [34]. Thus, a close relationship exists between P. micra and CRC; however, experimental studies on P. micra are scarce.

Although many bacteria are associated with various diseases, most strains used are not isolated from the disease samples but purchased from the American type culture collection (ATCC) [35, 36], which may not be from disease samples. For P. micra, the ATCC strain of P. micra was derived from suppurative pleurisy (https://www.atcc.org/products/33270) and not from patients with CRC. In addition, previous studies have confirmed that the composition of flora in the mucosa and feces is substantially different, and mucosal flora affects the occurrence and development of diseases more [37, 38]. Here we isolated a strain of P. micra from the mucosal tissues of patients with CRC. This strain was used for all experiments, making the experimental results more credible.

We first confirmed that P. micra can promote the development of CRC both in vivo and in vitro. In the gavage experiment with APCMin/+ mice, the levels of LDH, ALP, and Cr were significantly higher in Pm-42-administrated mice. An increase in LDH levels common in malignant tumors, myocardial infarction, and liver disease [39]. High ALP levels are commonly seen in liver disease, bone metastasis of malignant tumors, etc. [40]. Elevated creatinine is common in diseases such as kidney disease [41]. An increase in these indexes further proved that the tumors in the Pm-42 group were more malignant. Studies have shown that IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 are the most substantially changed cytokines in cancer, and their levels can even be related to cancer stage [42, 43]. Therefore, the significant increase of serum TNF-α and IL-6 in the Pm-42 group at both six and 12 weeks confirms that Pm-42 has a stronger proinflammatory effect. Thus, P. micra can contribute to the development of CRC.

MicroRNAs play an important role in CRC development, studies have shown that microRNAs plays a regulatory role in CRC related autophagy [44]. In addition, various cancer-associated bacteria can promote CRC development by regulating microRNAs. Bacteria such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, which causes CRC, promote the development of CRC by activating toll-like receptor 4 and upregulating microRNA-21 expression [18]. Toxigenic Bacteroides fragilis relies on METTL14-mediated m6A methylation to downregulate miR-149-3p, and thereby, promote CRC proliferation [19]. In this study, we demonstrated that P. micra can promote the development of CRC by upregulating the expression of miR-218-5p. Although miR-218-5p has been scarcely investigated in CRC studies, miR-218-5p was shown to directly target SFRP2 to upregulate the WNT/β-catenin pathway in a study on promoting hair proliferation [45, 46]. In addition, the miR-218/WNT signaling pathway was found to be activated in the bone metastasis of breast cancer cells [47].

To identify target genes regulated by miR-218-5p, we compared the starBase (ENCORI) database and confirmed the presence of PTPRR. Protein tyrosine phosphatase regulates various cellular processes, including cell growth, differentiation, mitosis, and oncogenic transformation [48]. PTPRR significantly inhibits the activation of the MAPK cascade [28]. As the most important signaling cascade in all MAPK signal transduction pathways, the Ras/ERK/c-Fos pathway plays a crucial role in the survival and development of tumor cells [49]. However, studies on the relationship between bacteria and MAPK signaling pathway in CRC are lacking. Here we confirmed that P. micra could promote CRC through the upregulation of miR-218-5p, which leads to the downregulation of PTPRR and then the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway (Fig. 8). Moreover, P. micra is an upstream activator of the miR-218-5p/PTPRR/MAPK signaling pathway.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Schematic diagram of the development and pathogenic mechanism of Parvimonas micra in colorectal cancer

Full size image

To verify the clinical applicability of these data, we collected samples from patients with CRC and also analyzed data from the TCGA database. Notably, according to stage T in TNM, miR-218-5p expression in T4 was significantly higher than that in T1–T3, and the survival rates of patients with high miR-218-5p expression in T4 were significantly lower. In the TNM staging system, T (tumor) stage refers to the condition of the primary tumor, and a progressive increase in tumor volume and the extent of adjacent tissue involved is represented by T1–T4, meanwhile, some studies have suggested that T stage has greater weight than N stage in the staging of CRC [50]. Therefore, miR-218-5p may be closely related to primary tumors. The expression of miR-218-5p was significantly higher in the middle and late pathological stages II–IV than in early stages, indicating that miR-218-5p plays an important role in disease development. Moreover, the increase in miR-218-5p has a direct relationship with P. micra. In summary, miR-218-5p and P. micra may be new targets for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CRC.

The relationship between gut microbiota and CRC is complex and has not been characterized or studied extensively. Therefore, identifying harmful intestinal microbiota in patients is of great significance. The purpose of our study was to identify biomarkers as indicators of early diagnosis and prognosis and apply bacterial targeted therapy of rectal cancer for treating or preventing CRC. In the future, it is important to study the relationship between gut microbiota and CRC by isolating patient-derived strains through culturomics, combining this data with metagenomic data, and evaluate disease pathogenesis.

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article (or its Supplementary Information files).

Abbreviations

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

P.micra :

Parvimonas micra

PTPRR:

Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor R

MOI:

Multiplicity of infection

RTCA:

Real-time cell analysis

IHC:

Immunohistochemical

SDS-PAGE:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

qPCR:

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

Cr:

Creatinine

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

PCoA:

Principal coordinate analysis

LEfSe:

Linear discriminant analysis effect size

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

ATCC:

American type culture collection

References

  1. Oncology TL. Colorectal cancer: a disease of the young? The Lancet Oncology. 2017;18:413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohlson EC, Digiovanni RM, Vera E, Nfonsam V. Increasing incidence of early onset colorectal Cancer in Arizona. J Surg Res. 2014;186:505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thanikachalam K, Khan G. Colorectal Cancer and nutrition. Nutrients. 2019;11:164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Song M, Emilsson L, Roelstraete B, Ludvigsson JF. 82 RISK OF COLORECTAL CANCER IN FIRST-DEGREE RELATIVES OF PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL POLYPS: A NATIONWIDE CASE-CONTROL STUDY IN SWEDEN. Gastroenterology. 2021;160:S-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Chen Y, Zhang J, Cao P, Su W, Deng Y, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes metastasis in colorectal Cancer by activating autophagy signaling via the upregulation of CARD3 expression. Theranostics. 2020;10:323–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu QQ, Li CM, Fu LN, Wang HL, Tan J, Wang YQ, et al. Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis induces the stemness in colorectal cancer via upregulating histone demethylase JMJD2B. Gut Microbes. 2020;12:1788900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pleguezuelos-Manzano C, Puschhof J, Huber AR, Hoeck Av, Wood HM, Nomburg J, et al. Mutational signature in colorectal cancer caused by genotoxic pks+E. coli. Nature. 2020;580:269–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang X, Jia Y, Wen L, Mu W, Wu X, Liu T, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes colorectal carcinoma by activating the hematopoietic NLRP3 Inflammasome. Cancer Res. 2021;81:2745–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Long X, Wong CC, Tong L, Chu ESH, Szeto CH, Go MYY, et al. Peptostreptococcus anaerobius promotes colorectal carcinogenesis and modulates tumour immunity, nature. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:2319–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drewes J, Chen J, Markham N, Knippel R, Domingue J, Tam A, et al. Human colon cancer-derived Clostridioides difficile strains drive colonic tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:1873–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neilands J, Davies J, Bikker F, Svensäter G. Parvimonas micra stimulates expression of gingipains from Porphyromonas gingivalis in multi-species communities. Anaerobe. 2019;55:54–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Horiuchi A, Kokubu E, Warita T, Ishihara K. Synergistic biofilm formation by Parvimonas micra and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Anaerobe. 2020;62:102100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Won SH, Kwong TNY, Chow TC, Luk AKC, Dai RZW, Nakatsu G, et al. Quantitation of faecal Fusobacterium improves faecal immunochemical test in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia. Gut. 2016;66:1441–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu J, Feng Q, Wong SH, Zhang D, Liang Q, Qin Y, et al. Metagenomic analysis of faecal microbiome as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Gut. 2017;66:70–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dai Z, Coker OO, Nakatsu G, Wu WKK, Zhao L, Chen Z, et al. Multi-cohort analysis of colorectal cancer metagenome identified altered bacteria across populations and universal bacterial markers. Microbiome. 2018;6:70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lwenmark T, Lfgren-Burstrm A, Zingmark C, Eklf V, Palmqvist R. Parvimonas micra as a putative non-invasive faecal biomarker for colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10:15250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen X, Li J, Li J, Zhang Y, Fang J. Fecal Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis-Peptostreptococcus stomatis-Parvimonas micra biomarker for noninvasive diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal laterally spreading tumor. Front Oncol. 2020;11:661048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang Y, Weng W, Peng J, Hong L, Yang L, Toiyama Y, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum increases proliferation of colorectal Cancer cells and tumor development in mice by activating toll-like receptor 4 signaling to nuclear factor−κB, and up-regulating expression of MicroRNA-21. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:851–866.e824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cao Y, Wang Z, Yan Y, Ji L, He J, Xuan B, et al. Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis promotes intestinal inflammation and malignancy by inhibiting exosomes-packaged miR-149-3p. Gastroenterology. 2021;161:1552–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y, Guo L, Li Y, Feng G, Teng F, Li W, et al. MicroRNA-494 promotes cancer progression and targets adenomatous polyposis coli in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ning ZB, Xh B, Yd B, Jda B. The role of miRNAs in colorectal cancer progression and chemoradiotherapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;134:111099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yuxiao C, Fengyi H, Zhiyuan P, Zongyu H, Ni H, Lei B, et al. Optimization of Culturomics strategy in human fecal samples. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen S, Su T, Zhang Y, Lee A, He J, Ge Q, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal cancer metastasis by modulating /KRT7. Gut Microbes. 2020;11:511–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang X, Li C, Cao W, Zhang Z. Alterations of gastric microbiota in gastric Cancer and precancerous stages. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:559148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kwong T, Wang X, Nakatsu G, Chow TC, Tipoe T, Dai R, et al. Association between bacteremia from specific microbes and subsequent diagnosis of colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:383–390.e388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chiang M-K, Hsiao P-Y, Liu Y-Y, Tang H-L, Chiou C-S, Lu M-C, et al. Two ST11 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains exacerbate colorectal tumorigenesis in a colitis-associated mouse model. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:e1980348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Y, Zhang C, Hou S, Wu X, Liu J, Wan X. Analyses of potential driver and passenger Bacteria in human colorectal Cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;2020:11553–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li X, Liu Z, Li W, Sun N, Xu Y, Xie Z, et al. PTPRR regulates ERK dephosphorylation in depression mice model. J Affect Disord. 2016;193:233–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong S, Zhao L, Zhang X, Nakatsu G, Han J, Xu W, et al. Gavage of fecal samples from patients with colorectal Cancer promotes intestinal carcinogenesis in germ-free and conventional mice. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:1621–1633.e1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu Q, Sun L, Xu Z, Fan L, Du Y. Severe pneumonia caused by Parvimonas micra: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xi Zhen L, Algazwi D, Makmur A, Salada B, Hallinan J. Symphysis pubis diastasis due to Parvimonas micra infection: an unusual suspect. J Clin Rheumatol. 2021;27:e98–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shah M, DeSantis T, Weinmaier T, McMurdie P, Cope J, Altrichter A, et al. Leveraging sequence-based faecal microbial community survey data to identify a composite biomarker for colorectal cancer. Gut. 2018;67:882–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu N, Jiao N, Tan J, Wang Z, Wu D, Wang A, et al. Multi-kingdom microbiota analyses identify bacterial-fungal interactions and biomarkers of colorectal cancer across cohorts. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7:238–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu J, Yang M, Wang D, Zhang S, Chen W. Alteration of the abundance of Parvimonas micra in the gut along the adenomacarcinoma sequence. Oncol Lett. 2020;20:106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsoi H, Chu E, Zhang X, Sheng J, Nakatsu G, Ng S, et al. Peptostreptococcus anaerobius induces intracellular cholesterol biosynthesis in Colon cells to induce proliferation and causes dysplasia in mice. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1419–1433.e1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu C, Fan L, Lin Y, Shen W, Qi Y, Zhang Y, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal cancer metastasis through miR-1322/CCL20 axis and M2 polarization. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:1980347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Flemer B, Lynch DB, Brown JMR, Jeffery IB, Ryan FJ, Claesson MJ, et al. Tumour-associated and non-tumour-associated microbiota in colorectal cancer. Gut. 2016;66:633–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen W, Liu F, Ling Z, Tong X, Xiang C, Moschetta A. Human Intestinal Lumen and Mucosa-Associated Microbiota in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39743.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wulaningsih W, Holmberg L, Garmo H, Malmstrom H, Lambe M, Hammar N, et al. Serum lactate dehydrogenase and survival following cancer diagnosis. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:1389–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chibaudel B, Tournigand C, Artru P, André T, Cervantes A, Figer A, et al. FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and high alkaline phosphatase level: an exploratory cohort of the GERCOR OPTIMOX1 study, annals of oncology : official journal of the European society for. Med Oncol. 2009;20:1383–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang M, Zhang Q, Ruan G, Tang M, Zhang X, Song M, et al. Association between serum creatinine concentrations and overall survival in patients with colorectal Cancer: a multi-center cohort study. Front Oncol. 2021;11:710423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chang P-H, Pan Y-P, Fan C-W, Tseng W-K, Huang J-S, Wu T-H, et al. Pretreatment serum interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-αlevels predict the progression of colorectal cancer. Cancer Med. 2016;5:426–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ray AL, Berggren KL, Cruz SR, Gan GN, Beswick EJ. Inhibition of MK2 suppresses IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α-dependent colorectal cancer growth. Int J Cancer. 2018;142:1702–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen L, He M, Zhang M, Sun Q, Zeng S, Zhao H, et al. The role of non-coding RNAs in colorectal cancer, with a focus on its autophagy. Pharmacol Ther. 2021;226:107868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hu S, Li Z, Lutz H, Huang K, Su T, Cores J, et al. Dermal exosomes containing miR-218-5p promote hair regeneration by regulating β-catenin signaling. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba1685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhao B, Chen Y, Yang N, Chen Q, Bao Z, Liu M, et al. miR-218-5p regulates skin and hair follicle development through Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by targeting SFRP2. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:20329–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hassan M, Maeda Y, Taipaleenmaki H, Zhang W, Jafferji M, Gordon J, et al. miR-218 directs a Wnt signaling circuit to promote differentiation of osteoblasts and osteomimicry of metastatic cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:42084–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Tonks N. Protein tyrosine phosphatases: from genes, to function, to disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:833–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim EK, Choi EJ. Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1802;2010:396–405.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li J, Yi CH, Hu YT, Li JS, Ding KF. TNM staging of colorectal Cancer should be reconsidered according to weighting of the T stage: verification based on a 25-year follow-up. Medicine. 2016;95:e2711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2301000), the National Natural Science Foundation for Key Programs of China (81790632), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970863), and the Innovation Leader Team Program of Guangzhou (201809010014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, 100071, China

    Yuxiao Chang, Ziran Huang, Fengyi Hou, Yuejiao Liu, Likun Wang, Zhen Wang, Yifan Sun, Zhiyuan Pan, Yafang Tan, Ruifu Yang & Yujing Bi

  2. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China

    Lei Ding & Hong Gao

Authors
  1. Yuxiao Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ziran Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fengyi Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuejiao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Likun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yifan Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhiyuan Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yafang Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lei Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hong Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ruifu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yujing Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R. Y. conceived the study. R. Y. and Y. B. designed the experiments. Y. C. did the experiments and analyzed the data; Z. H., F. H., Y. L., L. W., Z. W. and Y. S. did the experiments; Z. P. and Y. T. did the experiments and investigated the literature; L. D. and H. G. collected the samples; Y. C., Y. B., and R. Y. wrote and revised the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ruifu Yang or Yujing Bi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All Procedures performed in studies involving human participants or animals were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shijitan Hospital (Beijing, China; agreement no. 2018KY55). All patients gave their written consent before inclusion in the study. All the mouse experimental procedures were performed according to the protocols approved by the Shijitan Hospital Medical Experimental Animal Care Commission.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, Y., Huang, Z., Hou, F. et al. Parvimonas micra activates the Ras/ERK/c-Fos pathway by upregulating miR-218-5p to promote colorectal cancer progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 42, 13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-022-02572-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-022-02572-2

Keywords

  • Parvimonas micra
  • CRC
  • Exosomes
  • microRNA
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Ras/ERK/c-Fos signaling pathway

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research

ISSN: 1756-9966

Contact us