Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Exogenous incorporation of neugc-rich mucin augments n-glycolyl sialic acid content and promotes malignant phenotype in mouse tumor cell lines

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Contributed equally
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research200928:146

  • Received: 22 May 2009
  • Accepted: 1 December 2009
  • Published:



Carbohydrates embedded in the plasma membrane are one of the main actors involved in the communication of cells with the microenvironment. Neuraminic sialic acids are glycocalyx sugars that play important roles in the modulation of malignant cell behaviour. N-glycolylneuraminic acid (NeuGc) is synthesized by the cytidine monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase (CMAH), an enzyme expressed in all mammals except humans. In mice, this sugar is synthesized in several somatic tissues.


We used the B16 melanoma and F3II mammary carcinoma mouse tumor cell lines. By CMAH directed RT-PCR and NeuGc detection with the specific anti-NeuGc-GM3 antibody 14F7 we evaluated enzyme and ganglioside expression in tumor cells, respectively. Expression of NeuGc-GM3 ganglioside was reached by in vitro incubation with NeuGc-rich bovine submaxillary mucin and evaluated by slot-blot and immunohistochemistry assays using the 14F7 antibody. Tumor cells treated with mucin or purified NeuGc were injected s.c. and i.v. in syngeneic mice to evaluate tumor and metastatic growth.


In the present work we demonstrated the absence of expression of CMAH enzyme in B16 melanoma and F3II mammary carcinoma cells. In vitro incubation of these NeuGc-negative cells with NeuGc-rich mucin increased the presence of NeuGc in cell membranes for at least 48-72 h, as a component of the GM3 ganglioside. Preincubation with NeuGc-rich mucin reduced tumor latency and increased the metastatic potential of tumor cells in syngeneic animals. Similar results were obtained when cells were incubated with purified NeuGc alone.


Our results indicate that B16 and F3II mouse tumor cell lines do not express NeuGc in cell membranes but they are able to incorporate NeuGc from an exogenous source, contributing to the malignant phenotype of melanoma and mammary carcinoma cells.


  • Sialic Acid
  • Syngeneic Mouse
  • 14F7 Antibody
  • Brain Tumor Cell Line
  • Ganglioside Expression


The glycocalyx is composed of a broad variety of sugars that play a crucial role in the communication of cells with the microenvironment. Neuraminic sialic acids are 9-carbon sugars typically found in the glycocalyx that take part in the modulation of malignant cell behaviour [1, 2]. They are usually found as a terminal component of different membrane glycoconjugates, such as glycoproteins or glycolipids. Major examples are mucins and gangliosides, both implicated in the modulation of cell behaviour [3, 4]. The most common sialic acids in mammals are N-acetylneuraminic (NeuAc) and N-glycolylneuraminic (NeuGc) acids. The only structural difference between them consists of a single oxygen atom at the C-5 position of NeuGc catalyzed by the cytidine monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase (CMAH) [5]. While NeuGc is expressed in most somatic mouse cells, there is nearly no information regarding its expression in mouse cancer tissues [6]. Few reports suggest a null presence of this sugar in murine malignant cells.

Mucins are large molecular weight glycoproteins characterized by carbohydrate sugars attached via O-glycosidic linkages to serine or threonine, synthesized by a variety of secretory epithelial tissues as membrane-bound or secreted proteins. Characteristically, mucins present sialic acids as part of their sugar repertoire. In particular, the minor type of the bovine submaxillary mucin (BSM) presents a high concentration of NeuGc in its arborization [7].

It is well described that cells can process exogenous sialic acids from the extracellular environment and use them for their own glycoconjugates [8, 9]. In this work we explored the impact of exogenous NeuGc incorporation by NeuGc-rich BSM or purified NeuGc in vitro incubation in the malignant behaviour of B16 melanoma and F3II mammary carcinoma mouse tumor cell lines.


Tumor cells

B16F0 and F3II cell lines were maintained in DMEM-F12 culture medium (Gibco BRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS) (PAA, Pasching, Austria). Cells were subcultured twice a week using a trypsin-EDTA solution (Gibco BRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA). B16F0 is a C57BL/6 mouse melanoma cell line [10] while F3II is a mammary carcinoma cell line obtained from a clonal subpopulation of a spontaneous Balb/c mouse mammary tumor [11].


Expression of CMAH mRNA was evidenced by means of an RT-PCR assay, using total RNA from normal mouse liver or tumor cell lines as template. Total RNA was obtained using the RNAqueous Midi RNA kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. RT reactions consisted of 5 μg total RNA, 10 mM dNTPs, 50 ng random hexamers (pd(N)6; GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, England) as first strand primer, 0.1 M DTT, 40 U RNAseOUT (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 200 U Superscript III retrotranscriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in a 20 μl final volume. RT reactions were performed at 50°C during 1 h. The CMAH sequence was amplified by means of a PCR reaction comprised of 45 μl Supermix High Fidelity PCR mix (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 10 pmol forward primer (5'-CGCCTTCCTGGTGTGA-3'), 10 pmol reverse primer (5'-GTTGGGTGGTGTTAGAGG-3'), and 1 μg cDNA obtained in the RT step. The amplification profile consisted of a single initial denaturation step (95°C, 5 min), followed by 35 cycles of 95°C, 30 seg; 53.7°C, 1 min and 72°C, 1.5 min; ending with a final extension step (72°C, 5 min). PCR reactions yielded the expected 1776 bp amplicon and also another two products with similar sizes. Accordingly with the publication of Koyama et al. [12] the expression of this enzyme results in splicing alternatives which can explain the alternative bands obtained in this work.

Monoclonal antibodies

For immunohistochemistry or slot blot assays, the 14F7 monoclonal antibody was employed (gently provided by the Center of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba). This murine IgG antibody has demonstrated a specific reactivity against NeuGc-GM3 ganglioside [13, 14]. Additionally, Krengel et al. carried out a crystal structure analysis demonstrating that 14F7 specifically recognizes NeuGc-GM3, but not NeuAc-GM3 [15].

Slot blot assay

Multiwell plates (9.6 cm2/well) were seeded with tumor cells (5 × 105 cells/well) in DMEM-F12 with 10% FBS. After 24 h, cells were incubated either with a fixed BSM concentration (250 μg/ml) during different time spans (24, 48 or 72 h) or with various BSM concentrations (250 or 125 μg/ml) for 24 h. The cell membrane fraction was obtained by an adaptation of the technique of Del Pozo et al. [16]. Briefly, cells were obtained on ice in a hypotonic buffer containing 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT and 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were mechanically lysed with a glass homogenizer and centrifuged at 2,000 rpm. The supernatant was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm and the pellet was washed and resuspended in 100 μl of the hypotonic buffer. Total proteins were quantified by the Bradford assay (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Identical masses of membrane fractions were seeded on a PVDF membrane (Hybond-P; GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, England) previously activated with methanol and washed with TBS buffer with the aid of the BIO-DOT SP apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Once seeded, membranes were blocked with a 5% low-fat milk in TBS solution and washed with TBS. Incubation with the anti-NeuGc-GM3 antibody 14F7 (10 μg/ml) was performed at room temperature for 1 h. After washing them with TBS-T buffer, membranes were incubated with the biotinylated anti-mouse antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and then incubated with a streptavidin linked to peroxidase solution (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Bands were detected by the ECL method (GE Heathcare, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, England) following the manufacturer's instructions. Membranes were analyzed with the ImageJ analysis software (National Institute of Health) and the intensity of each band was recorded and expressed as arbitrary units.

Indirect immunoperoxidase staining

Tumor cells were cultured for 24 h in chamber-slides (Nalge-Nunc, Rochester, NY, USA) in serum-free DMEM-F12 medium containing 250 μg/ml of BSM (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and later formalin-fixed. Subsequently, monolayers were stained by the Vectastain kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. 14F7 mAb was used as primary antibody at a concentration of 10 μg/ml. Cells were counterstained with hematoxylin.

Adhesion assay

B16 or F3II cells were seeded (40,000 cells/well) in 96-well plates in D-MEM supplemented with 2 or 5% FBS, in the presence or absence of 50-100 μg/ml of purified NeuGc (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cells were incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator for 60 min. After incubation, cells were washed twice with 1× PBS buffer and fixed with methanol (100 μl/well). After a 10-min incubation, cells were stained with a 0.1% crystal violet solution (100 μl/well) for 10 min. After washing thoroughly with distilled water, 60 μl/well of a 10% methanol-5% acetic acid solution were added and the plate was shook for a few minutes. Absorbance at 595 nm was measured.

Proliferation assay

B16 or F3II cells were seeded (2,500 cells/well) in 96-well plates in D-MEM supplemented with 1, 5 or 10% FBS, in the presence or absence of 50-100 μg/ml of purified NeuGc. Plates were incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator for 72 h. After incubation, cells were treated with MTT (0.5 mg/ml 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide in PBS buffer; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). After a 3-h incubation, the supernatant was discarded, cells were resuspended in DMSO and absorbance was measured at 570 nm.

In vivo inoculation of BSM or NeuGc-preincubated cells into syngeneic mice

Tumor cell suspensions were preincubated with 500 μg/ml of BSM or 100 μg/ml of NeuGc in culture medium for 1 h and then extensively washed and resuspended. Control cells were incubated in the same medium without the addition of BSM or NeuGc. Inbred C57BL/6 and Balb/c mice were inoculated intravenously with 1 × 105 B16 and F3II cells, respectively. After 22 days, lungs were collected, fixed in Bouin's solution, and metastasic foci were counted under a dissecting microscope. In another set of experiments, mice were injected subcutaneously with B16 tumor cells preincubated or not with BSM. The time of appearance of local tumors was monitored by palpation and further confirmed by histopathology. Tumor size was measured with a caliper twice a week and tumor diameter was calculated as the square root of width × length. Animals were sacrificed 60 days after tumor inoculation or when they became moribund.


We first checked the expression of CMAH in B16 melanoma and F3II mammary carcinoma cells. To assess the presence of CMAH mRNA, an RT-PCR assay using high affinity primers was performed. As expected, normal liver was positive for CMAH expression, but neither B16 nor F3II cells expressed the gene. When performed on total RNA from normal liver, the RT-PCR assay yielded 3 distinct products (Fig. 1). After sequencing, all 3 shared a very high homology with the CMAH gene sequence. The intermediately-sized amplicon shared a 99% identity with the CMAH sequence while the other two proved to be alternatively spliced variants, as reported by Koyama et al [12].
Figure 1
Figure 1

Expression of the CMAH mRNA evidenced by RT-PCR. Lane 1, total RNA from the B16 mouse melanoma cell line; lane 2, total RNA from the F3II mouse mammary carcinoma cell line; lane 3, total RNA from normal mouse liver.

We then examined the expression of NeuGc in tumor cells by immunohistochemical staining, using the 14F7 antibody reactive against NeuGc-GM3. No expression was detected under serum-free in vitro culture conditions. On the contrary, in the presence of FBS both B16 and F3II cells became clearly positive (Fig. 2A-D), suggesting that NeuGc can be incorporated from the bovine source.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Indirect immunoperoxidase staining of the NeuGc-GM3 ganglioside with 10 μg/ml of 14F7 monoclonal antibody on formalin-fixed B16 (A, B and E) and F3II (C, D and F) monolayers, cultured in the presence (B and D) or absence (A and C) of 10% FBS or incubated with 250 μg/ml mucin in FBS-free medium for 24 h (E and F). Original magnification 1000×.

In order to increase NeuGc density in the cell membrane, we incubated B16 and F3II cells in vitro with the minor type of BSM, a mucin fraction with high NeuGc content [7]. As expected, in vitro cell incubation with NeuGc-rich BSM changed the ganglioside expression profile of B16 and F3II cells resulting in a significant increase of NeuGc-GM3 presence in cell membranes, as revealed by slot blot analysis (Fig. 3A and 3C). The expression was maintained in mouse tumor cells for at least 48-72 h (Fig. 3B and 3D). The same result was observed by immunohistochemical staining with 14F7 antibody on in vitro monolayer cultured cells (Fig. 2E and 2F).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Detection of NeuGc-GM3 in cell membrane fraction by slot blot assay in B16 (A and B) and F3II (C and D) cells. A and C, tumor cells were preincubated with different concentrations of NeuGc-rich BSM and processed 24 h later. B and D, tumor cells were preincubated with 250 μg/ml of NeuGc-rich BSM and further processed 24, 48 or 72 h after preincubation. In all cases, densitometric analysis was normalized to the respective control. Means ± SEM of at least 3 determinations are shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (ANOVA contrasted with Dunnet test).

Interestingly, incubation of tumor cells with purified NeuGc modulates the in vitro behaviour. Tumor cell adhesion showed a significant increase in both cell lines (Fig 4A); while NeuGc addition impacted differently on proliferation, significantly increasing growth in B16 but not in F3II cells (Fig 4B).
Figure 4
Figure 4

A, adhesion assay. B16 or F3II cells were incubated for 1 h in medium with 2% FBS, either with (filled bars) or without (empty bars) 50 μg/ml of purified NeuGc. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (t test). B, proliferation assay. B16 (black square) or F3II (black diamond) cells were grown for 72 h in medium supplemented with 1, 5 or 10% FBS, either with or without 100 μg/ml of purified NeuGc. Dashed line refers to proliferation in control monolayers without addition of NeuGc. Data represent mean of 6 determinations; in all cases SEM was less than 5%. ***p < 0.001 versus the respective control (ANOVA contrasted with Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test).

Finally, we evaluated tumorigenicity and lung colonization of BSM-preincubated tumor cells in syngeneic mice. In both mouse models preincubation with NeuGc-rich BSM significantly enhanced the metastatic ability of tumor cells, approximately doubling the number of lung nodules after intravenous cell injection (Table 1). Similar results were obtained after preincubation with purified NeuGc. B16 NeuGc-treated cells showed a 65% increase in lung nodules (Control: 14.5 ± 4.8, NeuGc: 22.3 ± 3.8; p = 0.14, Mann-Whitney U test), while for F3II NeuGc-treated cells the number of lung nodules resulted in a 112% increase (Control: 7.3 ± 1.8, NeuGc: 15.5 ± 2.2; p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). Although all animals challenged in the flank developed subcutaneous tumors, we observed a rapid tumor take with BSM-preincubated B16 cells. Significant differences were obtained for tumor latency and size of melanoma tumors. However, preincubation with BSM did not significantly modify tumor growth rate (Table 2).
Table 1

Experimental lung metastasis in syngeneic mice after intravenous injection of B16 melanoma or F3II mammary carcinoma cells, preincubated or not with NeuGc-rich BSM.


Lung metastasisA

(nodules per animal)


B16 cells

F3II cells


6.4 ± 2.2

6.2 ± 2.1


11.6 ± 1.5*

13.3 ± 3.1*

ALung nodules were counted 22 days after intravenous injection of B16 or F3II cells (1 × 105 cells/mouse). Values represent mean ± SEM of at least 10 mice.

*p < 0.05 versus the respective control (Mann-Whitney U test).

Table 2

Latency and size of melanoma tumors after inoculation of B16 cells, preincubated or not with NeuGc-rich BSM.


Tumor latencyA


Tumor DiameterA


Tumor Growth RateA



12.8 ± 1.6

2.2 ± 0.9

0.15 ± 0.03


8.4 ± 0.6**

7.1 ± 1.8*

0.18 ± 0.05

ATumor latency represents the time between the subcutaneous injection of a small burden of B16 cells (5 × 103 cells/mouse) and the appearance of detectable tumors.

Tumor diameter was recorded at day 35 after tumor cell inoculation. Values represent mean ± SEM of at least 8 mice.

**p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 (t test).


NeuGc and NeuAc are two of the main sialic acids in mammals, being the presence of the oxygen atom in the C-5 position the single difference between them. This seemingly minor difference is crucial in many aspects of cellular behaviour and is produced solely by the CMAH enzyme [5, 17]. This enzyme is present in animals from the deuterostome lineage [18], which includes all higher mammals. The expression of this particular enzyme is the reason for NeuGc presence in most murine normal tissues [19, 20]. In humans, an exon deletion/frameshift mutation in the CMAH gene renders the major pathway for NeuGc production non functional [21].

Sialic acids have been associated with intrinsic receptors that function as ligands for specific leucocyte receptors [22, 23] or as extrinsic receptors themselves for certain pathogens [24, 25]. The presence of the distinctive oxygen atom in NeuGc is determinant in the relationship of the cell with specific molecules or viruses [26, 27]. As an example, mouse CD22 (Siglec-2), a regulator of B-cell signalling, homeostasis and survival presents high affinity for NeuGc whereas its affinity for NeuAc is low [23].

Exploring the expression of NeuGc in murine cell lines, we have found that B16 and F3II cell lines do not express the CMAH gene and therefore under-express NeuGc in their cell membranes. Considering that most normal mouse somatic cells are positive for the expression of this gene, it is an interesting fact that malignant cells lack such expression. In cancer, sialic acids are over-expressed as part of gangliosides in several malignancies and their involvement in the malignant cell behaviour has been previously reported [2830]. The lack of expression of NeuGc in mouse tumor cells suggests that the silencing of the CMAH gene is an important step in the cell transformation process in this specie. Ecsedy et al. [31] reported that two brain tumor cell lines express this enzyme under in vivo conditions but not in vitro. However, authors could not discard potential contamination of in vivo samples with RNA from lymphoid cells, which have demonstrated to be positive for CMAH expression [32].

In human cancer, the situation is dramatically different. Interestingly, considering the null expression of NeuGc in human somatic cells, the expression of NeuGc-GM3 in some human tumors was undoubtedly found [3335]. Yin et al. reported notable results supporting the idea that tumor hypoxia could be one of the factors responsible for the presence of the non-human sialic acids, such as NeuGc, in human tumors [36].

It is known that cells are able to take in and process exogenous sialic acids for their own glycoconjugates [8, 9]. In our work, the cell lines tested were able to express NeuGc-GM3 when cultured in the presence of serum, suggesting an active incorporation of the sugar residue from the culture medium. Taking this fact into account, we incubated tumor cells with a NeuGc-rich fraction of BSM [7], looking for an increase in NeuGc presence in the cell membrane. Our results show that this strategy renders a transient increase of NeuGc-GM3 presence in the cell membrane, indicating endocytosis of BSM components, with consequent processing and utilization of NeuGc. In control slots, a slight staining with 14F7 antibody was observed. As it was demonstrated, this recognition could be due to the previous acquisition of NeuGc from bovine serum present in the growth medium during standard cell culture conditions. Numerous experiments have shown that mucin expression in tumor cells can enhance malignant behaviour [37, 38]. However, there are no reports showing that these molecules are able to be taken in and processed by cells. Our results support the idea that cells are able to process the NeuGc-rich BSM, incorporating some of their components in the carbohydrate sugar chains of the plasma membrane. Expression of NeuGc-GM3 on cell membrane as a consequence of preincubation with NeuGc-rich culture medium, was demonstrated also by immunohistochemistry. Results support that NeuGc present in culture medium can be incorporated and expressed on the cells either coming from bovine serum or from mucin.

The altered sugar expression pattern obtained after incubation with NeuGc-rich BSM or purified NeuGc resulted in promotion of the malignant phenotype. Preincubation with BSM or NeuGc increased the metastatic ability of both B16 melanoma and F3II carcinoma cells, and a reduced melanoma tumor latency by BSM preincubation was also observed. As it was shown, the presence of NeuGc in the plasma membrane is maintained in vitro for no more than two or three days. It is expected that an equal decline in the expression takes place in vivo. To explore the impact of NeuGc presence on tumor growth, we are currently working on the development of CMAH transfected cell lines in order to obtain a stable NeuGc expression tumor model. Preliminary results (not shown) suggested that transfected tumor cells have an increased in vitro adhesion and proliferation in a similar manner as mucin or NeuGc-treated cells. Since NeuGc-GM3 is a postulated tumor antigen in human cancers [39], development of NeuGc-positive murine tumor cells allows the possibility to evaluate cancer vaccines in animal models [40].

Considering the results obtained we hypothesize that NeuGc presence in the cell membrane is actively involved in the early phases of tumor formation and takes part in tumor nesting at distant sites.




We would like to thank Juan Garona for technical support. MRG, DEG and DFA are members of the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET, Argentina). The study was supported by grants from the National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion, Quilmes National University and Elea Laboratories (Argentina).

Authors’ Affiliations

Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Quilmes National University, (Roque Saenz Peña 352), Bernal, (B1876BXD), Argentina


  1. Kannagi R, Chang Gung Med J: Carbohydrate antigen sialyl Lewis a--its pathophysiological significance and induction mechanism in cancer progression. Chang Gung Med J. 2007, 30: 189-209.Google Scholar
  2. Patra SK: Dissecting lipid raft facilitated cell signaling pathways in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1785: 182-206.Google Scholar
  3. Schauer R: Achievements and challenges of sialic acid research. Glycoconj J. 2000, 17: 485-99. 10.1023/A:1011062223612.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Moniaux N, Chaturvedi P, Varshney GC, Meza JL, Rodriguez-Sierra JF, Aubert JP, Batra SK: Human MUC4 mucin induces ultra-structural changes and tumorigenicity in pancreatic cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2007, 97: 345-357. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603868.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Schlenzka W, Shaw L, Kelm S, Schmidt CL, Bill E, Trautwein AX, Lottspeich F, Schauer R: CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase: the first cytosolic Rieske iron-sulphur protein to be described in Eukarya. FEBS Lett. 1996, 385: 197-200. 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00384-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Varki A: Loss of N-glycolylneuraminic acid in humans: Mechanisms, consequences, and implications for hominid evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001, 54-69. 10.1002/ajpa.10018. Suppl 33Google Scholar
  7. Corfield AP, Corfield CD, Veh RW, Wagner SA, Clamp JR, Schauer R: Characterization of the major and minor mucus glycoproteins from bovine submandibular gland. Glycoconj J. 1991, 8: 330-9. 10.1007/BF00731345.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bardor M, Nguyen DH, Diaz S, Varki A: Mechanism of uptake and incorporation of the non-human sialic acid N-glycolylneuraminic acid into human cells. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 4228-37. 10.1074/jbc.M412040200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Oetke C, Hinderlich S, Brossmer R, Reutter W, Pawlita M, Keppler OT: Evidence for efficient uptake and incorporation of sialic acid by eukaryotic cells. Eur J Biochem. 2001, 268: 4553-61. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02379.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Fidler IJ: Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo. Cancer Res. 1975, 35: 218-24.Google Scholar
  11. Alonso DF, Farías EF, Bal de Kier Joffé ED: Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Activity Released by Clonal Tumor Cell Population Isolated During the Growth of a Murine Mammary Adenocarcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 1994, 13: 211-216.Google Scholar
  12. Koyama S, Yamaji T, Takematsu H, Kawano T, Kozutsumi Y, Suzuki A, Kawasaki T: A naturally occurring 46-amino acid deletion of cytidine monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase leads to a change in the intracellular distribution of the protein. Glycoconj J. 1996, 13: 353-8. 10.1007/BF00731467.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Carr A, Mullet A, Mazorra Z, Vázquez AM, Alfonso M, Mesa C, Rengifo E, Pérez R, Fernández LE: A mouse IgG1 monoclonal antibody specific for N-glycolyl GM3 ganglioside recognized breast and melanoma tumors. Hybridoma. 2000, 19: 241-7. 10.1089/02724570050109639.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodríguez M, Llanes L, Pérez A, Pérez R, Vázquez AM: Generation and characterization of an anti-idiotype monoclonal antibody related to GM3(NeuGc) ganglioside. Hybrid Hybridomics. 2003, 22: 307-14. 10.1089/153685903322538836.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Krengel U, Olsson LL, Martínez C, Talavera A, Rojas G, Mier E, Angström J, Moreno E: Structure and molecular interactions of a unique antitumor antibody specific for N-glycolyl GM3. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 5597-603. 10.1074/jbc.M311693200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Del Pozo MA, Price LS, Alderson NB, Ren XD, Schwartz MA: Adhesion to the extracellular matrix regulates the coupling of the small GTPase Rac to its effector PAK. EMBO J. 2000, 19: 2008-14. 10.1093/emboj/19.9.2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Shaw L, Schauer R: The biosynthesis of N-glycoloylneuraminic acid occurs by hydroxylation of the CMP-glycoside of N-acetylneuraminic acid. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1988, 369: 477-86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Warren L: The distribution of sialic acids in nature. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1963, 10: 153-71. 10.1016/0010-406X(63)90238-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hedlund M, Tangvoranuntakul P, Takematsu H, Long JM, Housley GD, Kozutsumi Y, Suzuki A, Wynshaw-Boris A, Ryan AF, Gallo RL, Varki N, Varki A: N-glycolylneuraminic acid deficiency in mice: implications for human biology and evolution. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 4340-4346. 10.1128/MCB.00379-07.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Markotić A, Marusić A, Tomac J, Müthing J: Ganglioside expression in tissues of mice lacking beta2-microglobulin. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002, 128: 27-35. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01802.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Irie A, Koyama S, Kozutsumi Y, Kawasaki T, Suzuki A: The molecular basis for the absence of N-glycolylneuraminic acid in humans. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 15866-71. 10.1074/jbc.273.25.15866.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Varki A, Angata T: Siglecs--the major subfamily of I-type lectins. Glycobiology. 2006, 16: 1R-27R. 10.1093/glycob/cwj008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Crocker PR, Paulson JC, Varki A: Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007, 7: 255-66. 10.1038/nri2056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Suzuki Y, Ito T, Suzuki T, Holland RE, Chambers TM, Kiso M, Ishida H, Kawaoka Y: Sialic acid species as a determinant of the host range of influenza A viruses. J Virol. 2000, 74: 11825-31. 10.1128/JVI.74.24.11825-11831.2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin MJ, Rayner JC, Gagneux P, Barnwell JW, Varki A: Evolution of human chimpanzee differences in malaria susceptibility: relationship to human genetic loss of N-glycolylneuraminic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 12819-24. 10.1073/pnas.0503819102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Campanero-Rhodes MA, Smith A, Chai W, Sonnino S, Mauri L, Childs RA, Zhang Y, Ewers H, Helenius A, Imberty A, Feizi T: N-glycolyl GM1 ganglioside as a receptor for simian virus 40. J Virol. 2001, 81: 12846-58. 10.1128/JVI.01311-07.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Varki A: Glycan-based interactions involving vertebrate sialic-acid-recognizing proteins. Nature. 2007, 446: 1023-9. 10.1038/nature05816.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohyama C: Glycosylation in bladder cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008, 13: 308-13. 10.1007/s10147-008-0809-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Guthmann MD, Bitton RJ, Carnero AJ, Gabri MR, Cinat G, Koliren L, Lewi D, Fernandez LE, Alonso DF, Gómez DE, Fainboim L: Active specific immunotherapy of melanoma with a GM3 ganglioside-based vaccine: a report on safety and immunogenicity. J Immunother. 2004, 27: 442-51. 10.1097/00002371-200411000-00004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Gu Y, Zhang J, Mi W, Yang J, Han F, Lu X, Yu W: Silencing of GM3 synthase suppresses lung metastasis of murine breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2008, 10: R1-10.1186/bcr1841.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ecsedy JA, Manfredi MG, Yohe HC, Seyfried TN: Ganglioside biosynthetic gene expression in experimental mouse brain tumors. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 1580-3.Google Scholar
  32. Seyfried TN, el-Abbadi M, Ecsedy JA, Bai HW, Yohe HC: Influence of host cell infiltration on the glycolipid content of mouse brain tumors. J Neurochem. 1996, 66: 2026-33. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66052026.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliva JP, Valdés Z, Casacó A, Pimentel G, González J, Alvarez I, Osorio M, Velazco M, Figueroa M, Ortiz R, Escobar X, Orozco M, Cruz J, Franco S, Díaz M, Roque L, Carr A, Vázquez AM, Mateos C, Rubio MC, Pérez R, Fernández LE: Clinical evidences of GM3 (NeuGc) ganglioside expression in human breast cancer using the 14F7 monoclonal antibody labelled with (99 m)Tc. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006, 96: 115-21. 10.1007/s10549-005-9064-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Malykh YN, Schauer R, Shaw L: N-Glycolylneuraminic acid in human tumors. Biochimie. 2001, 83: 623-34. 10.1016/S0300-9084(01)01303-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Scursoni AM, Galluzzo L, Camarero S, Pozzo N, Gabri MR, Mateo de Acosta C, Vazquez AM, Alonso DF, G de Dávila MT: Detection and characterization of n-glycolylated gangliosides in wilms tumor by immunohistochemistry. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2009Google Scholar
  36. Yin J, Hashimoto A, Izawa M, Miyazaki K, Chen GY, Takematsu H, Kozutsumi Y, Suzuki A, Furuhata K, Cheng FL, Lin CH, Sato C, Kitajima K, Kannagi R: Hypoxic culture induces expression of sialin, a sialic acid transporter, and cancer-associated gangliosides containing non-human sialic acid on human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 2937-45. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2615.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Carraway KL, Perez A, Idris N, Jepson S, Arango M, Komatsu M, Haq B, Price-Schiavi SA, Zhang J, Carraway CA: Muc4/sialomucin complex, the intramembrane ErbB2 ligand, in cancer and epithelia: to protect and to survive. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 2002, 71: 149-85. full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ho SB, Niehans GA, Lyftogt C, Yan PS, Cherwitz DL, Gum ET, Dahiya R, Kim YS: Heterogeneity of mucin gene expression in normal and neoplastic tissues. Cancer Res. 1993, 53: 641-51.Google Scholar
  39. Fernandez LE, Alonso DF, Gomez DE, Vazquez AM: Ganglioside-based vaccines and anti-idiotype antibodies for active immunotherapy against cancer. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2003, 2: 817-823. 10.1586/14760584.2.6.817.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Venuti A: Progress and challenges in the vaccine-based treatment of head and neck cancers. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 28: 69-81. 10.1186/1756-9966-28-69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar