Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Role of metabolism in cancer cell radioresistance and radiosensitization methods

  • 1, 2, 3,
  • 1, 2,
  • 2,
  • 2, 4,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2, 3,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 1, 2, 3,
  • 1, 2, 3,
  • 1, 2, 3,
  • 2, 5,
  • 1, 2, 3,
  • 1, 2, 3Email author and
  • 1, 2, 3Email author
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research201837:87

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-018-0758-7

  • Received: 18 December 2017
  • Accepted: 10 April 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Radioresistance is a major factor leading to the failure of radiotherapy and poor prognosis in tumor patients. Following the application of radiotherapy, the activity of various metabolic pathways considerably changes, which may result in the development of resistance to radiation.

Main body

Here, we discussed the relationships between radioresistance and mitochondrial and glucose metabolic pathways, aiming to elucidate the interplay between the tumor cell metabolism and radiotherapy resistance. In this review, we additionally summarized the potential therapeutic targets in the metabolic pathways.

Short conclusion

The aim of this review was to provide a theoretical basis and relevant references, which may lead to the improvement of the sensitivity of radiotherapy and prolong the survival of cancer patients.

Keywords

  • Radiotherapy
  • Radioresistance
  • Metabolic pathway
  • Sensitivity
  • Cancer

Background

Cancer is a major health concern, and the conventional treatments for cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. Since tumor cells show sensitivity to the ionizing radiation (IR), radiotherapy emerged as the main type of cancer treatment [13]. Radiotherapy directly induces DNA damage or indirectly induces the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cancer cells. Additionally, radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy and chemotherapy may reverse tumor hypoxia by reducing tumor oxygen consumption,and alters tumor immune response, which may lead to considerable clinical improvements in many different types of tumor [4, 5]. Radiotherapy has the advantage of localized application, but the IR was shown to activate several epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) transcription factors, including SNAI1, HIF1 (hypoxia inducible factor 1), ZEB1, and STAT3, promoting cancer cell metastasis [6]. Radioresistance leads to poor prognosis in cancer patients and it represents the main reason for radiotherapy failure, which can ultimately lead to tumor recurrence and metastases [7].

Cancer is closely associated with metabolic disorders [810]. Metabolic reprogramming, the alteration of the metabolic pathways in tumor cells during a response to hypoxia or malnutrition, is considered one of the hallmarks of cancer [11, 12]. Aberrant activation of oncogenes and tumor-related signaling pathways can induce the metabolic reprogramming of prostate or breast cancer cells, producing specific metabolic fingerprints [13, 14]. Furthermore, the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes is an important factor underlying tumor metabolic changes [15]. In contrast, metabolic changes can promote the development and progression of cancer as well [10]. Moreover, many studies confirmed that the metabolic syndrome, which includes obesity, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes, has a profound impact on the occurrence and development of cancer [1619]. As an important type 2 diabetes mellitus therapeutic, metformin showed efficacy against prostate cancer, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer [2022], suggesting that the targeting of tumor metabolism may provide a new therapeutic strategy for cancer [23].

Metabolic changes can induce radioresistance as well [24], and the alterations in the glycolytic metabolism were shown to contribute to radioresistance development. Radiotherapy effects primarily depend on glucose metabolism [25, 26], while the mitochondrial metabolic alterations can be involved in this process as well. A comprehensive analysis of the metabolic pathways of cancer patients that underwent radiotherapy revealed an increased expression of genes that regulate mitochondrial functions, autophagy, and lysosomal degradation activities, as well as a strong reliance on mitochondrial respiration and diminished dependence on the Warburg effect [27]. Liu et al. [28] demonstrated that CDK1 mediates the activation of sirtuin 3 (SIRT3), regulates the mitochondrial protein deacetylation, thus promoting the metabolic balance, and enhances mitochondrial functions, inducing the anti-radiation effects in colon, glioma, and breast cancer cells.

Therefore, in this review, we discuss glucose and mitochondrial metabolisms as the main metabolic pathways involved in the radioresistance development. Additionally, we review several sensitizing agents targeting these pathways to enhance the radiosensitivity of cancer patients.

Radioresistance of cancer cells

Since the discovery of the IR in 1895, radiotherapy emerged as the treatment-of-choice for many types of cancer, and has been applied as the first-line therapy for many human malignancies [29]. Tumor radiotherapy is a highly targeted and efficient method of destroying cancer cells that can lead to the curing of or palliation of many cancer patients after surgery. The IR induces oxidative stress in cancers cells [30], and free OH radicals are considered the IR-induced common mediators of DNA damage, including single-strand breaks (SSB) and double-strand breaks (DSB), which disturb the DNA structure, triggering cell death [31]. In addition to the DNA targeting, the IR can affect plasma membrane and subcellular organelles, and induce the activation of cell stress response-related genes and intracellular signaling pathways, triggering cell death [29]. Additionally, the irradiated cells may affect their non-irradiated neighbors through the bystander effect, or the transmission of the apoptotic signals to the surrounding unirradiated cells through a direct cellular contact or intercellular communication, which leads the unirradiated cells to exhibit similar biological effects to those of the irradiated cells [32]. Combined, these effects lead to the DNA damage, chromosomal instability, mutation and apoptosis in cancer cells, ultimately killing them (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The biological effects of radiation and the mechanism of radiation resistance. The outer ring indicates the biological effects of IR under normal conditions. The abnormal alterations of these effects will further induce the occurrence of radiation resistance. The inner ring indicates the mechanism of radiation resistance and the biological changes in the occurrence of radioresistance. These abnormal changes are the important reasons for treatment failure of cancer patients

IR is the most effective therapeutic method for the treatment of many tumors; however, owing to radioresistance development, it remains only a conservative cancer treatment [33]. Radioresistance is a process in which the tumor cells or tissues adapt to the radiotherapy-induced changes and develop resistance to the IR. This is a complex process involving multiple genes, factors, and mechanisms [34, 35].

The mechanisms underlying the development of radioresistance have been the focus of many studies, and the main factors involved in this process were shown to be the following (Fig. 1):
  1. (1)

    DNA damage repair. Radiation can induce DNA damage response (DDR), which protects the cells against genomic instability, and the cells develop radioresistance by increasing the DDR rate. Following the detection of the IR-induced DNA damage in cancer cells, several main signaling pathways can rapidly respond and initiate DNA repair, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and SIRT pathways [36, 37]. PI3K signaling pathway regulates the steady-state homologous recombination levels, promoting DNA damage repair, and the PI3K inhibitor PI-103 can significantly enhance radiation-induced death [38]. MAPK is the mediator of cellular stress responses, involved in the phosphorylation of XRCC1 and regulation of oxidative stress response, promoting the damage repair [39]. Furthermore, SIRT represents a class of histone deacetylases, and downregulation of SIRT1 promotes cell death by decreasing DNA repair enzyme levels, including MSH2, MSH6, and APEX1 [40].

     
  2. (2)

    Cell cycle arrest. Following the IR-induced DNA damage detection, molecules in the cell cycle checkpoints can regulate and arrest cell cycle progression, and 14–3-3σ, a member of 14–3-3 protein family, was shown to be closely associated with the radioresistance development by arresting cancer cells in the G2/M phase [41]. Moreover, tumor cells can utilize two distinct kinase signaling cascades for the DNA damage repair here, including ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 axes [42].

     
  3. (3)

    Oncogene and tumor suppressor alterations. For example, the cell adhesion molecule vitronectin (VTN) is an important oncogene, and the dysregulation of its expression promotes the migration and invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) as well as resistance of the NPC cells to radiotherapy [43, 44]. Additionally, many miRNAs, e.g., miR-29c and miR-22, have tumor-suppressor roles, and the alteration in their expression in lung and breast cancer cells represents an important cause of radioresistance [45, 46].

     
  4. (4)

    Changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) may lead to the radioresistance development. Many immunosuppressive processes increase the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis, and the immune evasion has emerged as a serious obstacle in cancer treatment [47]. Changes in the cytokine levels, EMT-related processes, and hypoxic conditions can promote radioresistance in tumor cells [4851].

     
  5. (5)

    Autophagy. Autophagy is a metabolic-recycling pathway that involves a proteasome-independent degradation of cellular components [52]. Its dysfunctions may promote the development of systemic autoimmune diseases, such as lupus [53], while in cancer, it may promote or inhibit the survival and proliferation of cancer cells in the TME [54]. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an alkylating agent used to treat glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and anaplastic astrocytomas, which induces autophagy and subsequent treatment resistance. When the transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) inhibitor is used in combination with TMZ, a decrease in NRF2 expression increases TMZ-induced autophagy, attenuating cancer cell proliferation [55]. Chrysin, a NRF2 inhibitor, was shown to be able to overcome drug resistance by preventing the activation PI3K/AKT and ERK pathways [56]. P62 is a marker for degradation in autophagy, and its accumulation leads to the activation of NFΚB and stabilization of NRF2, which confers the resistance to hypoxic stress in tumor cells. Furthermore, autophagy preserves damaged organelles, including mitochondria [54]. In many cases, autophagy can reduce the rate of DNA damage-induced apoptosis, playing a protective role in tumor cells, which induces radioresistance in tumor cells [57, 58]. Targeting autophagy can be an effective way to improve the effects of radiotherapy [59].

     
  6. (6)

    The generation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) can represent a mechanism of resistance to radiotherapy. CSCs are undifferentiated cancer cells with high oncogenic activity, with the self-renewal ability and multi-directional differentiation potential [52]. CSCs tend to be responsible for the minimal residual disease (MRD), as they exhibit high metastatic potential after chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Furthermore, these cells are responsible for the development of tumor cell heterogeneity, which is a key factor in the resistance of anticancer therapy [52], and they are robust as well, including their cell cycle regulation, rapid response to DNA damage, detoxification or the mediation of cytotoxic agent efflux, anti-oxidative stress, ROS scavenging, and specific TME maintenance, which contribute to the development of radiation resistance [6062]. Glioma stem cells are in contact with the endothelial cells in the perivascular niche, and display the hallmarks of radiation resistance [63]. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family was shown to be associated with the acquired or adaptive resistance of CSCs to the conventional anti-cancer therapies, including radiation therapy. Repeated irradiation induces the self-renewal potential of glioma stem cells by increasing IGF1 secretion and upregulating IGF type 1 receptor expression. Chronic receptor activation results in the inhibition of the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, which in turn activates the transcription factor FOXO3A, leading to the cell cycle arrest. However, the acute irradiation of slow-circulating CSCs induces a rapid activation of IGF1-AKT signaling, which promotes radioprotection [64]. Chemotherapy was found to induce increased IGF2 expression, which paradoxically leads to the maintenance of dormant state in the osteosarcoma cells, promoting survival and conferring resistance to various treatments [65]. These results shown that the blocking of altered IGF signaling may represent a novel therapeutic approach to the selective treatment of glioma and osteosarcoma CSCs. The use of metformin, salinomycin, DECA-14, rapamycin, and other drugs may help prevent the development of radioresistant cells by inhibiting CSC self-renewal or redox capacity [52, 66].

     
  7. (7)

    Tumor metabolism. An increasing number of studies demonstrated that radioresistance is closely associated with the tumor metabolism alterations [24, 25]. Clinically, the main cause of radiotherapy failure is cellular radioresistance, conferred via glycolytic or mitochondrial metabolic changes [67]. Targeting cellular glucose or mitochondrial metabolism may improve the clinical response to cancer therapeutics [25, 68, 69].

     

Given the high costs of discovery, development, registration, and commercialization of novel therapeutic drugs, drug repositioning has attracted attention because of the well-known safety profiles of these drugs [54]. For example, terfenadine, commonly used for the treatment of auto-immune disorders such as allergic dermatitis, has been shown to prevent the secretion of VEGF from mast cells localized in the hypoxic microenvironment, and to induce ROS-mediated apoptosis and autophagy of malignant melanoma cells [70, 71]. Artemisinin and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs can affect the response of cells to radiotherapy by regulating autophagy. Therefore, these drugs can be investigated as potential radiosensitizers [54].

Glucose metabolism and radioresistance

Carbohydrates, the main source of cellular energy, mainly participate in the process of the oxidative decomposition of glucose, which comprises glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) [72]. In the 1920s, Warburg demonstrated that even in the presence of physiological oxygen levels, cancer cells can have active glycolytic phenotypes. This aerobic glycolysis is known as the Warburg effect, characterized by an increased glucose uptake rate, active glycolysis, and high lactic acid contents [73, 74]. Additionally, the synthesis of NADPH in cancer cells is induced through the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and the decrease in OxPhos levels in mitochondria, thereby reducing intracellular ROS levels and increasing tumor dependence on glycolysis [75]. Active glycolysis shows proliferative advantages during somatic cell carcinogenesis, and it represents an important component of malignant phenotype [76].

AKT is an important kinase that regulates various biological processes such as cell proliferation, survival, metabolism, and vascularization. AKT-mediated alterations in the cellular glucose metabolic pathway confer radioresistance to tumor cells when these cells are exposed to radiation for a long time [25]. The inhibition of mitochondrial respiration by mitochondrial respiratory modulators (e.g., di-nitro phenol) leads to a considerable increase in the glycolytic index. The elevated glycolysis rate facilitates the rejoining of radiation-induced DNA strand breaks by activating both non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) pathways, thus reducing the radiation-induced cytogenetic damage in cancer cells [77]. Additionally, radiotherapy can result in changes in many relevant molecules in the glycolytic pathway. In contrast, some key molecules in the glucose metabolism or its products, such as glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), HIF1, and lactic acid, can affect the efficiency of radiotherapy [7880].

GLUT1 role in radioresistance development

GLUT family represents a class of 14 proteins essential for glucose metabolism and found in the membranes of various cells. GLUT1 is the most common and widely distributed member of this family [78, 81], involved in the glucose transport and its expression is upregulated under hypoxic conditions, and therefore, it is often used as a cellular hypoxia marker [82]. GLUT1 overexpression was shown to be associated with the radioresistance and poor prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients, which suggests that GLUT1 may be used as an indicator of the sensitivity to and prognosis of cancer radiotherapy [83, 84]. Radioresistant tumor cells often have high GLUT1 levels, which was associated with oncogene activation, tumor suppressor inactivation, stimulation of hypoxia, and the regulation of different signaling pathways, such as MAPK and PI3K/AKT [78].

Targeting GLUT1 and related signaling pathways may represent an effective way to improve radiotherapy efficacy [85]. As a natural flavonoid, apigenin was shown to have anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic effects, exerted through the downregulation of GLUT1, HIF1α, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression [86]. Apigenin was confirmed to inhibit the expression of GLUT1 by regulating PI3K/AKT pathway, and improving the radiosensitivity of laryngeal carcinoma, prostate cancer, and adenoid cystic carcinoma cells [8789]. Additionally, WZB117, a small molecule, acts as a specific inhibitor of GLUT1, overcoming the resistance of cancer cells to radiation [90]. WZB117 and radiation therapy combined can inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells and sensitize cancer cells to radiotherapy by increasing the level of intracellular ROS [91]. Furthermore, the antisense oligonucleotide chain (AS-ODNs) of GLUT1 can also induce the radiosensitivity of laryngeal carcinoma cells (Fig. 2) [92, 93]. Co-suppression of GLUT1 and the members of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway was shown to improve the radiosensitivity of laryngeal carcinoma xenograft cells in nude mice, suggesting that PI3K/AKT signaling pathway plays an important role in the development of radioresistance [94].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

A schematic model illustrating the relationship between glucose metabolism and radiation resistance. Radiation-resistant cells exhibit an active glycolytic phenotype, and the enzymes in the glycolytic pathway play an important role in the process of radioresistance and can serve as targets for improving the efficacy of radiotherapy. In addition, HIF is able to activate glycolytic enzymes and promote the occurrence of radioresistance by inducing cell autophagy and angiogenesis. * was used to represent the targets to enhance radiosensitivity, the corresponding radiosensitizers are indicated in the same color in rectangle

The role of lactic acid in radioresistance development

Lactic acid is one of the main products of glycolysis and one of the key factors in the development of malignant tumors. Alterations in glucose metabolism after radiotherapy can lead to the accumulation of large amounts of lactic acid, which is one of the unique malignant tumor phenotypes [26, 95]. The concentration of lactic acid in tumor tissues was shown to be significantly higher than that in the healthy tissues [96], and it can promote tumor metastasis, recurrence, and radioresistance, resulting in poor prognosis in many cancers [97]. Lactic content can predict metastasis rates, overall survival of patients, is a genotoxic stress biomarker, and it was shown to be associated with hypoxia-induced radioresistance [98]. In the nude mouse model of human squamous cell carcinoma, the accumulation of lactic acid was shown to correlate with radioresistance [80]. Michael et al. [99] demonstrated that the lactic acid accumulation induces many adverse effects in the cancer-associated stromal cells, which can help regulate angiogenesis by affecting proliferation, differentiation, and maturation of fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Lactic acid inhibits the activation and differentiation of many immune cells, such as dendritic and T-cells, by interfering with their metabolism and mediating immune escape [100, 101]. Additionally, it can induce the release of hyaluronic acid by tumor-associated fibroblasts, which promotes cell migration and clustering, VEGF secretion, and neovascularization [102]. All these represent potential mechanisms involved in the lactic acid-associated radioresistance (Fig. 2).

The monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) can transport lactate through the cell membrane, and these molecules are encoded by the SLC16 gene family comprising 14 members, with only four subtypes (MCT1-MCT4) known to be proton transporters. Of these, MCT1 shows the highest affinity for the lactic acid [103]. Shiho et al. [97] showed that the levels of lactic acid in myeloma cells are associated with MCT1 expression. A competitive inhibitor of MCT1, CHC reduces the expression of lactic acid, inducing cell apoptosis (Fig. 2). The downregulation of MCT1 expression induces the expression of FAS protein in ovarian cancer cells, significantly inhibiting the activation of its downstream targets, such as FASL and FAP1, and promoting the expressions of apoptosis-related protein caspase-3, which indicates that MCT1 can induce resistance to cisplatin by antagonizing FAS (Fig. 2) [104], and that it may play the same role in radioresistance development.

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDHA) is found in almost all human tissues; it is a major enzyme catalyzing the conversion of pyruvate to lactic acid, and plays an important role in the glycolytic process [105]. Michael et al. [106108] demonstrated that LDH5 overexpression can indicate hypoxic conditions, which can be associated with local recurrence, distant metastases, lower overall survival, and radioresistance of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, prostate, and bladder cancers. Furthermore, soluble adenylate cyclase (sAC) promotes the release of LDHA, accelerates cell proliferation, and induces the anti-irradiation effects in prostate cancer cells through the activation of BRAF/ERK1/2 signaling pathway [109]. FX-11, a specific inhibitor of LDHA, can promote the generation of DSBs and cell apoptosis by reducing the EMT, DNA repair capacity, hypoxia, and autophagy in prostate cancer cells, improving cell sensitivity to radiotherapy [105]. Acting as a tumor suppressor, the expression of miR-34 was shown to negatively correlate with radioresistance development and to induce the sensitivity of the hepatocellular carcinoma cells to radiotherapy by inhibiting the expression of LDHA (Fig. 2) [110, 111].

HIF1 and radioresistance

Hypoxic conditions in cells often have a negative impact on the radiotherapy outcomes [112]. Tumors rely more on anaerobic glycolysis for energy production than the normal tissues. Malignant tumor environments are often hypoxic, and they rely on exacerbated glycolysis to meet the increased demand for ATP and biosynthetic precursors [113]. Hypoxic environments promote the transformation of tumor cell metabolism from the oxidative metabolism to anaerobic glycolysis, which protects tumor cells and induces the development of radioresistance in tumor stem cells [114]. In human osteosarcoma cells, hypoxia was shown to confer anti-irradiation effects and induce the expression of autophagy-related proteins LC3 and LC3-II, suggesting that hypoxia can activate cell autophagy and accelerate the removal of ROS from the cells, leading to radioresistance development [115]. Moreover, hypoxia can activate EGFR and NRF2 expression in lung cancer cells, inducing radioresistance (Fig. 2) [116], together with the activation of HIF1 transcription, which regulates the adaptive cellular responses to hypoxia [112]. HIF1 has been identified as an important mediator of the carbohydrate metabolic pathway reprogramming from OxPhos to glycolysis [117], and it is composed of two subunits, HIF1α and HIF1β, and HIF1α expression is oxygen-dependent due to the presence of an oxygen-dependent degradation domain. HIF1β, known as aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT), is constitutively expressed, and therefore, not affected by environmental conditions [118]. The heterodimer formed by HIF1α/HIF1β constitutes a functional HIF1 molecule, characterized by the presence of hypoxia-responsive element within the promoter or enhancer region [119]. HIF1α is the main regulatory subunit of this molecule, which binds to the promoter and upregulates HIF1β expression [120]. A previous study confirmed that HIF1α can activate the transcription of target genes that regulate various biological processes, including cell proliferation, glucose metabolism, and pH regulation, playing a vital role in the adaptation of cancer cells to hypoxic conditions (Fig. 2) [121].

A number of studies demonstrated that HIF1 promotes tumor invasion, metastasis, and mediates the anti-irradiation effects [112]. The mechanisms underlying the development of radioresistance may include the following:
  1. (1)

    The promotion of tumor angiogenesis. HIF1 activates the expression of angiogenic cytokines such as VEGF and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), enabling radioresistance development in endothelial cell and increasing tumor vascular proliferation and regrowth (Fig. 2) [122].

     
  2. (2)

    Inhibition of apoptosis. N-Myc downstream regulatory gene 2 (NDRG2) is a downstream target of HIF1, which inhibits the expression of pro-apoptotic protein BAX, promoting the development of radioresistance. HIF1α can also directly inhibit p53-induced apoptosis, and the p53 status is a major determinant of the HIF1 effects on tumor radiosensitivity [123, 124].

     
  3. (3)

    Activation of radioresistance-related signaling pathways. HIF1α can induce the expression of CXCL8, a chemokine with tumorigenic and angiogenic roles. CXCL8 expression further activates AKT/mTOR/STAT3 signaling pathway, supporting liver cancer progress and metastases and inducing radiotherapy resistance [125]. Additionally, the MEK/ERK signaling transduction pathway mediates the sustained expression of DNA protein kinase (DNA-PKcs), which regulates the expression and activity of HIF1 protein, thereby inducing radioresistance in glioblastomas [126].

     
  4. (4)

    Hypoxia-induced autophagy. Autophagy is activated in response to stress (e.g., hypoxic conditions), and HIF1α was shown to be involved in the radiation-induced autophagic cell death in breast cancer cells. Elevated autophagy levels reduce the IR-induced DNA damage [127]. Sun et al. [128] found that hypoxia-induced autophagy can lead to the resistance of colon cancer cells to radiotherapy through the activation HIF1/miR-210/BCL2 pathway. High HIF1 levels can trigger autophagy activation and induce the expression of autophagy-associated protein LC3 and the degradation of p62. Furthermore, HIF1α can increase the phosphorylation of c-JUN, a downstream HIF1α molecule, and the expression of autophagy gene BECN1, which mediates radioresistance in lung cancer cells (Fig. 2) [129].

     
  5. (5)

    Hypoxia-induced CSC activation. A hypoxic or perinecrotic microenvironment was found to be advantageous for the survival and proliferation of other types of CSCs. Hypoxic cells express higher levels of CSC markers such as CD44, CD133, OCT3/4, and SOX2 [130, 131]. CD44 promotes CSC phenotype and resistance to radiation [132], and its isoforms, the standard isoform, CD44s, and several variant isoforms (CD44v), have different functions. Following the irradiation, CD44s expression is strongly upregulated in a dose-dependent manner, compared with that of CD44v, and contributes to the longer-term cell survival by maintaining ERK phosphorylation and the radiation-induced EMT [133]. CD44v is produced by alternative splicing regulated primarily by ESRP1/2 and has recently been shown to stabilize anti-ROS machinery by stabilizing xCT (cysteine/glutamate antiporter) on the cell membrane [134]. Anticancer therapy leads to the ectopic expression of CD44v in osteosarcoma and hepatic cancer cells of patients with Li-Fraumeni disease [135]. This may be because an undetectable number of CD44v8–10-positive CSCs produces excess ROS levels due to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A mutually exclusive expression pattern of CD44v8–10 and c-MYC was observed based on the activation of the ROS-mediated β-catenin/Wnt signaling pathway [136, 137]. The ubiquitin ligase Fbw7 family regulates c-Myc expression, exerting the anti-tumor effect [138]. CD44 has been reported as a useful marker for the prediction of tumor radiosensitivity, and its levels can be used for the prediction of local recurrence after laryngeal cancer radiotherapy [139]. Decreased levels of ROS and apoptosis in CD44+ CD24+ cells may contribute to the development of radioresistance in pancreatic cancer [140]. Radical cystectomy is preferred for the cases where the overexpression of CD44 and/or IL6 is observed in the preoperative specimens [132]. Both HIF1 and HIF2α are activated under hypoxic conditions and promote the stem-like properties of cancer cells. Furthermore, HIF2α was recently shown to contribute together with the intracellular domain of CD44 generated by γ-secretase to the acquisition of radioresistance by glioma stem cells in a perivascular niche rich in osteopontin [141].

     

An increasing number of studies have shown that, by targeting HIF1 activity, tumor antioxidant capacity can be reduced, as it affects the TME and promotes the sensitivity of solid tumors to radiotherapy. By combining HIF1 targeting and radiotherapy, improved therapeutic effects can be achieved [142]. For example, the use of chetomin, a chemical HIF1α inhibitor, can disrupt the interactions between this molecule and p300, attenuate hypoxia-induced gene expression, and increase radiosensitivity of cancer cells under severe hypoxic conditions [143]. Additionally, HIF1α inhibition leads to the downregulation of stem cell markers and a decrease in radioresistance of cervical cancer cells [144]. Various HIF1 inhibitors function through different signaling pathways, thereby enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy. KNK437 is a benzylidene lactam compound that inhibits the synthesis of heat shock proteins (HSPs), which increase DNA damage repair and inhibit cell death, stabilizing HIF1α expression and promoting radioresistance. KNK437 can abrogate hypoxia-induced anti-radiation effects by targeting both AKT and HIF1α [145]. Furthermore, 2-methoxyestradiol is an estrogen metabolite that suppresses HIF1α levels and its transcriptional activity. It depolymerizes microtubules and prevents HIF1α nuclear accumulation [146], increasing the radiosensitivity of NPC stem cells and melanoma cells by inactivating NF-κB/HIF1 or HIF1α/PDK1 signaling pathway [147, 148]. Berberine can inhibit tumor metastasis, tumorigenicity, and growth, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)-induced tumor invasion and EMT [149]. Moreover, it enhances the radiosensitivity of NPC cells by inhibiting the expression of HIF1α and VEGF [150]. NVP-BEZ235, an inhibitor of PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway, can inhibit the activation of HIF1α/VEGF signaling pathway in endometrial cancer and suppress radioresistance development [151]. As STAT3 inhibitors, NSC74859 and Stattic can improve the radiosensitivity of esophageal cancer through the inhibition of hypoxia and radiation-induced STAT3 activation, as well as the expression of HIF1α and VEGF [152, 153]. Additionally, docetaxel is a semi synthetic paclitaxel derived from European yew, which has been widely applied in the clinical treatment of gastric, non-small cell lung (NSCL), ovarian, and breast cancers [154], and which was shown to induce the activation of JNK2 signaling pathway, mediate the phosphorylation of PHD1, and inhibit the expression of HIF1α, leading to the apoptosis of the tumor cells in hypoxic conditions [155]. Finally, paclitaxel pretreatment was shown to inhibit the radioresistance of HIF1α-induced hepatocellular carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma, suggesting that it can be used as a sensitizer for radiotherapy (Fig. 2) [156].

In addition to the inhibitors of HIF1, many miRNAs can promote or inhibit hypoxia-induced radioresistance. MiR-210 was shown to be expressed in the different types of tumor and normal cells in hypoxic environments [157]. The expression of miR-210 promotes the DSB repair, increases the production of lactic acid, and HIF1α stability [158]. The downregulation of miR-210 significantly inhibits cell viability, inducing G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest, and increasing apoptosis rates and the radiosensitivity of hypoxic hepatocarcinoma cells [157, 159]. Furthermore, miR-21 was shown to regulate the radiosensitivity of cervical cancer cells through the PTEN/AKT/HIF1α feedback loop and the AKT-mTOR signaling pathway [160]. Hypoxia-responsive miR-124 and miR-144 overexpression can inhibit hypoxia-induced autophagy and enhance the radiosensitivity of prostate cancer cells by downregulating the expression of the PIM1 oncogene [161], while miR-216a can enhance the radiosensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells by inhibiting BECN1-mediated autophagy (Fig. 2) [162]. Additionally, a decrease in miR-23a expression promotes the radioresistance of NPCs, determining their response to radiotherapy [163].

The role of other molecules associated with glucose metabolism in radioresistance development

Pyruvate kinase (PK) can convert phosphoenolpyruvate and ADP into pyruvate and ATP, which makes it one of the major rate-limiting enzymes in glycolysis. A previous study demonstrated that the PK expression positively correlates with the radiotherapy resistance in tumor cells [164]. The M2 isoform (PKM2) is a key regulator of glycolysis, expressed only in cancer cells [165], and targeting this molecule can inhibit cell viability, induce G2/M arrest, and promote apoptosis. Additionally, this can increase the radiosensitivity of NSCLCs and the IR-induced apoptosis and autophagy rates, which are associated with the inhibition of AKT and PDK1 phosphorylation [166]. PKM2 is targeted by miR-133 as well, and this miRNA is downregulated in radioresistant lung cancer cells. MiR-133b resensitizes radioresistant lung cancer cells by inhibiting PKM2-mediated glycolysis [167]. Nitric oxide (NO) levels were shown to be significantly associated with cellular metabolism, and a decrease in the NO levels leads to a significant reduction in PDK1 expression, enhancing the radiosensitivity of hypoxic NSCLCs [168]. Furthermore, dichloroacetate, a PDK inhibitor, can effectively radiosensitize glioblastoma cells [164], while the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells with diisopropylamine dichloroacetate (DADA) can increase their sensitivity to radiation (Fig. 2) [169].

Hexokinase 2 (HK2) is a key glycolytic enzyme in glucose metabolism, highly expressed in a variety of human solid tumors. Its upregulation can induce glycolysis, and it is essential for tumor progression and maintenance. By inhibiting HK2 signaling in cancer cells, their radiosensitivity may increase [170]. Additionally, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) is an inhibitor of glucose metabolism and ATP production, which can help suppress the IR-induced radioresistance [171]. Following the phosphorylation of HK2 by 2-DG, this molecule can disrupt the radiation-induced DNA damage repair in tumor cells and promote their apoptosis by reducing intracellular energy levels [172]. The combination of 2-DG and histone deacetylase transferase inhibitors can induce apoptosis in glioblastoma cells [173], while 2-DG can also significantly inhibit the expression of HK2 and induce apoptosis (Fig. 2) [174].

Mitochondrial metabolism and radiotherapy resistance

In addition to glucose metabolism, mitochondrial metabolism is closely related to radioresistance development as well. Mitochondria exist in most cells and are the main sites of cellular aerobic respiration, with different energy metabolic pathways. Mitochondria adapt to the rapid tumor growth requirements by regulating the energy production process [175]. Radiotherapy resistance in cancer cells is associated with changes in the mitochondrial energy metabolism, mitochondrial size, morphology, and functions. Furthermore, mitochondrial mutation rate, respiration, and intracellular ATP levels are increased as well [176]. Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and the expression of several proteins involved in mitochondrial energy metabolism play important roles in tumor radiotherapy resistance.

Mitochondrial oxidative stress and radioresistance

The redox environment, representing a balance between the generation of ROS species and their removal by antioxidant enzymes, is a key regulator of oxidative stress in cells. Excessive superoxide levels, if not removed by endogenous antioxidants or related enzymes, can cause oxidative stress damage in mitochondria. Manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) is the main antioxidant enzyme, which can catalyze the disproportionation of superoxide anion radicals, protecting the body from ROS-induced damage. Moreover, MnSOD regulates the response of cells, tissues, and organs to the IR, which is essential for the protection of mitochondria and cells from oxidative stress (Fig. 3). The increased activity of MnSOD was shown to increase significantly the viability of pancreatic cancer cells after γ-ray irradiation and activate G2 checkpoint block, ultimately inducing radioresistance in pancreatic cancer cells [177].
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

A schematic model illustrating the relationship between mitochondrial metabolismand radiation resistance. IR inhibits the oxidative stress of mitochondria, causes abnormal expression of mitochondrial protein and increases the mitochondrial membrane potential, thereby promoting DNA damage repair and inhibiting apoptosis, leading to the occurrence of radioresistance. * was used to represent the targets to enhance radiosensitivity, the corresponding radiosensitizers are indicated in the same color in rectangle

Many studies demonstrated that the protection of cells against the mitochondrial oxidative stress-induced cell death can promote radioresistance development. Maus et al. [178] showed that the glial cell antigen 2 (NG2) can protect oligodendrocyte precursor cells from oxidative stress by interacting with mitochondrial serine protease OMI/HtrA2. NG2 downregulation can increase the apoptosis and cell sensitivity to oxidative stress. This interaction between NG2 and OMI/HtrA2 may contribute to radioresistance development in gliomas (Fig. 3). Additionally, following treatment with Il6, rat glioma cells developed radioresistance by suppressing mitochondrial oxidative stress. Therefore, Il6 treatment induces radioresistance in tumor cells by inhibiting the increase in ROS levels (Fig. 3) [179].

In contrast, enhanced mitochondrial oxidative stress can promote tumor cell radiosensitivity. Sorafenib is a novel anti-cancer drug that can induce the apoptosis of drug- and radiation-resistant hepatoma cells through mitochondrion-dependent oxidative stress mechanisms. The mechanism of its action includes rapid formation of ROS in mitochondria, triggering of the mitochondrial calcium overload, and activating apoptotic processes by releasing cytochrome C and activating caspase 3/7 pathway [180]. Ceramides induce ROS accumulation as well, through the activation of mitochondrial/caspase apoptosis pathways, and inhibiting radioresistance [181]. Moreover, DADA regulates the switch from glycolysis to OxPhos and induces intracellular ROS level increase, thereby enhancing the radiosensitization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Fig. 3) [169].

Mitochondrion-associated protein and radioresistance

The mechanisms underlying cell irradiation are complex, and they are involved in the inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of cancer cell apoptosis. Mitochondrial proteins are involved in apoptosis as well, and therefore, they may play a key role in the radiation signal transduction. The mitochondrial proteomes derived from Burkitt lymphoma before and after irradiation were analyzed and 23 differentially expressed proteins were identified [182]. This suggests that radiotherapy can lead to the considerable alterations in the mitochondrial protein expression, and therefore induce radioresistance.

Currently, the mitochondrion-associated proteins that were shown to be associated with radioresistance include the following: (1) Adenosine monophosphate family protein 3A (ATAD3A), often expressed in cancer patients and shown to be related to the sensitivity of cancer patients to chemotherapeutics. Increased ATAD3A expression can inhibit the IR-induced apoptosis in glioblastoma cells. After silencing ATAD3A, the expression of ATM, histone H2AX, and H3 was shown to decrease, inhibiting the DNA damage repair and ultimately promoting tumor cell radiosensitivity [183]. (2) NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase SIRT3 is a member of the sirtuin family, present in mitochondria, that promotes metabolic homeostasis by modulating mitochondrial protein deacetylation. Following the SIRT3 transcription, cyclin B1/CDK1 further induce SIRT3 activity. Mutations in the SIRT3 Thr150Ala/Ser159Ala lead to a decrease in MnSOD activity and the production of mitochondrial ATP, increasing sensitivity to radiotherapy. Therefore, the targeting of CDK1-mediated phosphorylation of SIRT3 may represent an effective way to sensitize tumor cells to radiation therapy [28]. (3) Mitochondrial MAPK phosphatase (MKP1) represents a potential target for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers. MKP1 is overexpressed in radioresistant breast cancer cells and it can translocate to mitochondria after irradiation, preventing the activation of apoptosis by inhibiting the accumulation of phosphorylated JNK. MKP1 is the major downstream effector of the HER2-activated RAF/MEK/ERK1/2 pathway. Mitochondrial MKP1 confers radioresistance to HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells, and by co-suppressing the expression of MKP1 and HER2, breast cancer cell apoptosis can be induced, while inhibiting radioresistance (Fig. 3) [184].

MMP and radioresistance

During respiratory oxidative processes, the MMP is generated due to the asymmetric distribution of protons and other ions on both sides of the inner mitochondrial membrane. A physiological MMP is a prerequisite for the maintenance of the physiological cell functions. Studies have shown that some molecules and related signaling pathways induce radioresistance by increasing MMP or inhibiting its decrease. Therefore, targeting the MMP can be an effective way to increase radiosensitivity. The main molecules and processes underlying MMP effects on radiosensitivity include the following: (1) Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF15), a member of the TGF-β superfamily, participates in homeostasis maintenance and regulates radiosensitivity. Li et al. [185] demonstrated that GDF15 contributes to radioresistance development in head and neck cancer (HNC) cells by activating MMP and inhibiting intracellular ROS generation. Therefore, GDF15 levels may indicate radioresistance levels and its expression may represent a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of HNC. (2) MEK/ERK-mediated signaling selectively inhibits IR-induced decrease in MMP and inhibits FAS-mediated cell death by inhibiting caspase-8 activity. MEK-specific inhibitor PD98059 was shown to prevent the observed effects of MEK/ERK on MMP and the development of radioresistance [186]. (3) Histone deacetylase inhibitors increase radiosensitivity by reducing MMP and promoting ROS production, G2/M phase arrest, and the IR-induced apoptosis of the esophageal cancer cells [187]. (4) In the radiation-resistant cells (CRR) treated with paclitaxel, ROS levels can increase through the decrease in MMP and OxPhos activation, thus overcoming the radioresistance of these cells (Fig. 3) [188].

Furthermore, mitochondrial ion channels are involved in radioresistance development as well. Different types of ion channels can be found on the inner and outer mitochondrial membranes, and they are involved in many important cellular processes, including ATP production, apoptosis, and cell proliferation [189]. Some ion channels as therapeutic targets have been widely used in clinic. Mitochondrial KATP channel (mtKATP channel) is an important member of this family. MtKATP overexpression was found to be closely related to the degree of malignancy of gliomas and the overall survival of patients. Importantly, mtKATP channel can regulate glioma radioresistance development by modulating the ROS-induced ERK activation (Fig. 3), suggesting that the mtKATP pathway is a key regulator of radiosensitivity in gliomas, and the blockers and inhibitors of mtKATP channel and MAPK/ERK kinase, respectively, may represent novel therapeutics of the treatment of gliomas [190].

Conclusions

Radioresistance emerged as one of the major obstacles to cancer treatment, and it is caused by numerous factors. An increasing number of studies demonstrated that radioresistance development can be associated with tumor metabolism, as the radiotherapy may induce alterations in many molecules and signaling pathways involved in the tumor cell metabolism, and metabolic changes may affect the efficacy of radiotherapy. Therefore, previous studies investigated the changes in glucose, mitochondrial, and other metabolic processes, and the effects of these changes on cellular radioresistance. Based on these results, many molecules or inhibitors were developed, as shown in Table 1, which can target specific metabolic processes or molecules, to be used as radiotherapy sensitizers for the inhibition of radioresistance development in tumors. However, these sensitizers induce side effects in many non-cancerous cells, since they do not show high specificity and efficacy. Taken together, the mechanisms underlying the development of radioresistance should be further studied, together with the roles of tumor metabolism in these processes, in order to identify novel, more efficient and specific radiosensitizers, and provide novel strategies for the treatment of malignant tumors.
Table 1

Metabolism-associated targets in radioresistance and the radiosensitization methods

Items

Targets

Radiosensitizer

Reference

Glycose

metabolism

GLUT1

Apigenin,WZB117

[77, 81]

MCT1

CHC

[94]

LDHA

FX-11, miR-34

[95, 100, 101]

PKM2

miR-133, DADA

[145, 147]

HK2

2-DG

[149, 150]

HIF

Chetomin, KNK437, 2-ME2,

[121, 123, 124]

Barberin, NVP-BEZ235, miR-216a

[128, 129, 140]

NSC74859, Stattic, Docetaxel

[130133]

miR-21, miR-124, miR-144

[138, 139]

Mitochondrial metabolism

Oxidative stress

Sorafenib, Ceremides, DADA

[147, 158, 159]

MMP

PD98059, HDIs, Paclitaxel

[164166]

Abbreviations

2-DG: 

2-deoxy-D-glucose

ARNT: 

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator

AS-ODN: 

Antisense oligonucleotide chain

ATAD3A: 

Adenosine monophosphate family protein 3A

CSC: 

Cancer stem cell

DDR: 

DNA damage response

DSB: 

Double-strand break

EMT: 

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition

GBM: 

Glioblastoma multiforme

GDF15: 

Growth differentiation factor-15

GLUT1: 

Glucose transporter 1

HIF1: 

Hypoxia inducible factor 1

HK2: 

Hexokinase 2

HNC: 

Head and neck cancer

HR: 

Homologous recombination

HSP: 

Heat shock protein

IGF: 

Insulin-like growth factor

IR: 

Ionizing radiation

LDHA: 

Lactate dehydrogenase

MAPK: 

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MCT: 

Monocarboxylate transporter

MMP: 

Mitochondrial membrane potential

MnSOD: 

Manganese superoxide dismutase

MRD: 

Minimal residual disease

NDRG2: 

N-Myc downstream regulatory gene 2

NG2: 

Glial cell antigen 2

NHEJ: 

Non-homologous end joining

NO: 

Nitric oxide

NPC: 

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

NRF2: 

Erythroid 2-related factor 2

NSCL: 

Non-small cell lung

OxPhos: 

Oxidative phosphorylation

PDGF: 

Platelet-derived growth factor

PI3K: 

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

PK: 

Pyruvate kinase

PPP: 

Pentose phosphate pathway

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

sAC: 

Soluble adenylate cyclase

SSB: 

Single-strand break

TGF-β: 

Transforming growth factor-β

TME: 

Tumor microenvironment

TMZ: 

Temozolomide

VEGF: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor

Declarations

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (111 Project, No. 111-2-12), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472531, 81472595, 81572787, 81672683, 81672993, 81672688, 81702907 and 81772928), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2015JJ1022, 2016JC2035 and 2017SK2105), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central South University (2016zzts478 and 2014zzts066).

Authors’ contributions

WX, ZYZ, LT conceived this work. All the authors contributed in the preparation of this paper. LT contributed to collecting the data, analysis and drafting the first copy. FW, YFW, YH, FX and ZJG were responsible for searching the literature and editing the manuscript. CG, XYL, HD, KC, MZ, BX, XLL, YL, GYL, WX and ZYZ were responsible for the theme, final editing and preparation of the manuscript for submission. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis of the Chinese Ministry of Health, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
(2)
The Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion of the Chinese Ministry of Education, Cancer Research Institute, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
(3)
Hunan Key Laboratory of Nonresolving Inflammation and Cancer, Disease Genome Research Center, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
(4)
Hunan Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
(5)
Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

References

  1. Wei F, Wu Y, Tang L, Xiong F, Guo C, Li X, et al. Trend analysis of cancer incidence and mortality in China. Sci China Life Sci. 2017;60:1271–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. He Y, Jing Y, Wei F, Tang Y, Yang L, Luo J, et al. Long non-coding RNA PVT1 predicts poor prognosis and induces radioresistance by regulating DNA repair and cell apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:235.Google Scholar
  3. Jagsi R. Progress and controversies: radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:135–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Rekers NH, Troost EG, Zegers CM, Germeraad WT, Dubois LJ, Lambin P. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: present status and future perspectives. Cancer Radiother. 2014;18:391–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhong Y, Du Y, Yang X, Mo Y, Fan C, Xiong F, et al. Circular RNAs function as ceRNAs to regulate and control human cancer progression. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:79.Google Scholar
  6. Tang Y, He Y, Zhang P, Wang J, Fan C, Yang L,  et al. LncRNAs regulate the cytoskeleton and related Rho/ROCK signaling in cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:77.Google Scholar
  7. Rycaj K, Tang DG. Cancer stem cells and radioresistance. Int J Radiat Biol. 2014;90:615–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu Z, Xiao Y, Zhou Z, Mao X, Cai J, Xiong L, et al. Extensive metabolic disorders are present in APC(min) tumorigenesis mice. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;427:57–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Rani V, Deep G, Singh RK, Palle K, Yadav UC. Oxidative stress and metabolic disorders: pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Life Sci. 2016;148:183–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tang Y, Wang J, Lian Y, Fan C, Zhang P, Wu Y, et al. Linking long non-coding RNAs and SWI/SNF complexes to chromatin remodeling in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:42.Google Scholar
  11. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Yoshida GJ. Metabolic reprogramming: the emerging concept and associated therapeutic strategies. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:111.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Priolo C, Pyne S, Rose J, Regan ER, Zadra G, Photopoulos C, et al. AKT1 and MYC induce distinctive metabolic fingerprints in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2014;74:7198–204.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang L, Hou Y, Yuan J, Tang S, Zhang H, Zhu Q, et al. Twist promotes reprogramming of glucose metabolism in breast cancer cells through PI3K/AKT and p53 signaling pathways. Oncotarget. 2015;6:25755–69.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Faubert B, Vincent EE, Griss T, Samborska B, Izreig S, Svensson RU, et al. Loss of the tumor suppressor LKB1 promotes metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells via HIF-1alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:2554–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gruber S, Straub BK, Ackermann PJ, Wunderlich CM, Mauer J, Seeger JM, et al. Obesity promotes liver carcinogenesis via Mcl-1 stabilization independent of IL-6Ralpha signaling. Cell Rep. 2013;4:669–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Koene RJ, Prizment AE, Blaes A, Konety SH. Shared risk factors in cardiovascular disease and Cancer. Circulation. 2016;133:1104–14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zagar TM, Cardinale DM, Marks LB. Breast cancer therapy-associated cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13:172–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Szablewski L. Diabetes mellitus: influences on cancer risk. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014;30:543–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chong RW, Vasudevan V, Zuber J, Solomon SS. Metformin has a positive therapeutic effect on prostate Cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med Sci. 2016;351:416–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Xu H, Chen K, Jia X, Tian Y, Dai Y, Li D, et al. Metformin use is associated with better survival of breast Cancer patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Oncologist. 2015;20:1236–44.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Tseng CH. Metformin reduces ovarian cancer risk in Taiwanese women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015;31:619–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones NP, Schulze A. Targeting cancer metabolism--aiming at a tumour's sweet-spot. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17:232–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Pitroda SP, Wakim BT, Sood RF, Beveridge MG, Beckett MA, MacDermed DM, et al. STAT1-dependent expression of energy metabolic pathways links tumour growth and radioresistance to the Warburg effect. BMC Med. 2009;7:68.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Shimura T, Noma N, Sano Y, Ochiai Y, Oikawa T, Fukumoto M, et al. AKT-mediated enhanced aerobic glycolysis causes acquired radioresistance by human tumor cells. Radiother Oncol. 2014;112:302–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sattler UG, Meyer SS, Quennet V, Hoerner C, Knoerzer H, Fabian C, et al. Glycolytic metabolism and tumour response to fractionated irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 2010;94:102–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Viale A, Pettazzoni P, Lyssiotis CA, Ying H, Sanchez N, Marchesini M, et al. Oncogene ablation-resistant pancreatic cancer cells depend on mitochondrial function. Nature. 2014;514:628–32.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu R, Fan M, Candas D, Qin L, Zhang X, Eldridge A, et al. CDK1-mediated SIRT3 activation enhances mitochondrial function and tumor Radioresistance. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:2090–102.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewanski CR, Gullick WJ. Radiotherapy and cellular signalling. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2:366–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Delaney G, Jacob S, Featherstone C, Barton M. The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer. 2005;104:1129–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Dahm-Daphi J, Sass C, Alberti W. Comparison of biological effects of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation and hydrogen peroxide in CHO cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 2000;76:67–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Chevalier F, Hamdi DH, Saintigny Y, Lefaix JL. Proteomic overview and perspectives of the radiation-induced bystander effects. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2015;763:280–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, et al. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 2006;444:756–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Luo M, Ding L, Li Q, Yao H. miR-668 enhances the radioresistance of human breast cancer cell by targeting IkappaBalpha. Breast cancer. 2017;24:673–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Huang T, Yin L, Wu J, Gu JJ, Wu JZ, Chen D, et al. MicroRNA-19b-3p regulates nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiosensitivity by targeting TNFAIP3/NF-kappaB axis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016;35:188.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Toulany M, Schickfluss TA, Eicheler W, Kehlbach R, Schittek B, Rodemann HP. Impact of oncogenic K-RAS on YB-1 phosphorylation induced by ionizing radiation. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R28.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Bur H, Haapasaari KM, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Kuittinen O, Auvinen P, Marin K, et al. Low Rap1-interacting factor 1 and sirtuin 6 expression predict poor outcome in radiotherapy-treated Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59:679–89.Google Scholar
  38. Jang NY, Kim DH, Cho BJ, Choi EJ, Lee JS, Wu HG, et al. Radiosensitization with combined use of olaparib and PI-103 in triple-negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:89.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. de Sousa MML, Bjoras KO, Hanssen-Bauer A, Solvang-Garten K, Otterlei M. p38 MAPK signaling and phosphorylations in the BRCT1 domain regulate XRCC1 recruitment to sites of DNA damage. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6322.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Jang J, Huh YJ, Cho HJ, Lee B, Park J, Hwang DY, et al. SIRT1 enhances the survival of human embryonic stem cells by promoting DNA repair. Stem Cell Reports. 2017;9:629–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Chen Y, Li Z, Dong Z, Beebe J, Yang K, Fu L, et al. 14-3-3sigma contributes to Radioresistance by regulating DNA repair and cell cycle via PARP1 and CHK2. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15:418–28.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Gogineni VR, Nalla AK, Gupta R, Dinh DH, Klopfenstein JD, Rao JS. Chk2-mediated G2/M cell cycle arrest maintains radiation resistance in malignant meningioma cells. Cancer Lett. 2011;313:64–75.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Wei F, Tang L, He Y, Wu Y, Shi L, Xiong F, et al. BPIFB1 (LPLUNC1) inhibits radioresistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by inhibiting VTN expression. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:432.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Wei F, Wu Y, Tang L, He Y, Shi L, Xiong F, et al. BPIFB1 (LPLUNC1) inhibits migration and invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by interacting with VTN and VIM. Br J Cancer. 2018;118:233–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhou R, Wu Y, Wang W, Su W, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2018;425:134–42.Google Scholar
  46. Zhang X, Li Y, Wang D, Wei X. miR-22 suppresses tumorigenesis and improves radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells by targeting Sirt1. Biol Res. 2017;50:27.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Tang Y, He Y, Shi L, Yang L, Wang J, Lian Y, et al. Co-expression of AFAP1-AS1 and PD-1 predicts poor prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:39001–11.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Goffart N, Lombard A, Lallemand F, Kroonen J, Nassen J, Di Valentin E, et al. CXCL12 mediates glioblastoma resistance to radiotherapy in the subventricular zone. Neuro-Oncology. 2017;19:66–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang Y, Xia M, Jin K, Wang S, Wei H, Fan C, et al. Function of the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase in carcinogenesis and associated therapeutic opportunities. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:45.Google Scholar
  50. Zhang H, Luo H, Jiang Z, Yue J, Hou Q, Xie R, et al. Fractionated irradiation-induced EMT-like phenotype conferred radioresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Radiat Res. 2016;57:370–80.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Xie G, Liu Y, Yao Q, Zheng R, Zhang L, Lin J, et al. Hypoxia-induced angiotensin II by the lactate-chymase-dependent mechanism mediates radioresistance of hypoxic tumor cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42396.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Yoshida GJ, Saya H. Therapeutic strategies targeting cancer stem cells. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:5–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Doria A, Gatto M, Punzi L. Autophagy in human health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1845.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang L, Tang Y, Xiong F, He Y, Wei F, Zhang S, et al. LncRNAs regulate cancer metastasis via binding to functional proteins. Oncotarget. 2017;9(1):1426–43.Google Scholar
  55. Yan Y, Xu Z, Dai S, Qian L, Sun L, Gong Z. Targeting autophagy to sensitive glioma to temozolomide treatment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016;35:23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Gao AM, Ke ZP, Shi F, Sun GC, Chen H. Chrysin enhances sensitivity of BEL-7402/ADM cells to doxorubicin by suppressing PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 and ERK/Nrf2 pathway. Chem Biol Interact. 2013;206:100–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Chang L, Graham PH, Hao J, Ni J, Bucci J, Cozzi PJ, et al. PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibitors enhance radiosensitivity in radioresistant prostate cancer cells through inducing apoptosis, reducing autophagy, suppressing NHEJ and HR repair pathways. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1437.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Chen X, Wang P, Guo F, Wang X, Wang J, Xu J, et al. Autophagy enhanced the radioresistance of non-small cell lung cancer by regulating ROS level under hypoxia condition. Int J Radiat Biol. 2017;93:764–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Lei Y, Zhang D, Yu J, Dong H, Zhang J, Yang S. Targeting autophagy in cancer stem cells as an anticancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2017;393:33–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Chan R, Sethi P, Jyoti A, McGarry R, Upreti M. Investigating the Radioresistant properties of lung Cancer stem cells in the context of the tumor microenvironment. Radiat Res. 2016;185:169–81.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Li F, Zhou K, Gao L, Zhang B, Li W, Yan W, et al. Radiation induces the generation of cancer stem cells: a novel mechanism for cancer radioresistance. Oncol Lett. 2016;12:3059–65.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Chi HC, Tsai CY, Tsai MM, Yeh CT, Lin KH. Roles of long noncoding RNAs in recurrence and metastasis of radiotherapy-resistant Cancer stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:E1903.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Calabrese C, Poppleton H, Kocak M, Hogg TL, Fuller C, Hamner B, et al. A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:69–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Osuka S, Sampetrean O, Shimizu T, Saga I, Onishi N, Sugihara E, et al. IGF1 receptor signaling regulates adaptive radioprotection in glioma stem cells. Stem cells. 2013;31:627–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Shimizu T, Sugihara E, Yamaguchi-Iwai S, Tamaki S, Koyama Y, Kamel W, et al. IGF2 preserves osteosarcoma cell survival by creating an autophagic state of dormancy that protects cells against chemotherapeutic stress. Cancer Res. 2014;74:6531–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Ning X, Shu J, Du Y, Ben Q, Li Z. Therapeutic strategies targeting cancer stem cells. Cancer Biol Therapy. 2013;14:295–303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Yu L, Sun Y, Li J, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Shi Y, et al. Silencing the Girdin gene enhances radio-sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma via suppression of glycolytic metabolism. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36:110.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Bol V, Bol A, Bouzin C, Labar D, Lee JA, Janssens G, et al. Reprogramming of tumor metabolism by targeting mitochondria improves tumor response to irradiation. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:266–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Weinberg SE, Chandel NS. Targeting mitochondria metabolism for cancer therapy. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11:9–15.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Nicolau-Galmes F, Asumendi A, Alonso-Tejerina E, Perez-Yarza G, Jangi SM, Gardeazabal J, et al. Terfenadine induces apoptosis and autophagy in melanoma cells through ROS-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Apoptosis. 2011;16:1253–67.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Jeong HJ, Oh HA, Nam SY, Han NR, Kim YS, Kim JH, et al. The critical role of mast cell-derived hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in human and mice melanoma growth. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:2492–501.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Li Z, Zhang H. Reprogramming of glucose, fatty acid and amino acid metabolism for cancer progression. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73:377–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Fan C, Tang Y, Wang J, Xiong F, Guo C, Wang Y, et al. Role of long non-coding RNAs in glucose metabolism in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:130.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Li L, Li W. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human cancer: comprehensive reprogramming of metabolism, epigenetics, and differentiation. Pharmacol Ther. 2015;150:33–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:891–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Bhatt AN, Chauhan A, Khanna S, Rai Y, Singh S, Soni R, et al. Transient elevation of glycolysis confers radio-resistance by facilitating DNA repair in cells. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:335.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Fang J, Zhou SH, Fan J, Yan SX. Roles of glucose transporter-1 and the phosphatidylinositol 3kinase/protein kinase B pathway in cancer radioresistance (review). Mol Med Rep. 2015;11:1573–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Liu J, Zhang J, Wang X, Li Y, Chen Y, Li K, et al. HIF-1 and NDRG2 contribute to hypoxia-induced radioresistance of cervical cancer Hela cells. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:1985–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Quennet V, Yaromina A, Zips D, Rosner A, Walenta S, Baumann M, et al. Tumor lactate content predicts for response to fractionated irradiation of human squamous cell carcinomas in nude mice. Radiother Oncol. 2006;81:130–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Sun L, Zeng X, Yan C, Sun X, Gong X, Rao Y, et al. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of glucose transporters GLUT1-4. Nature. 2012;490:361–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Chung FY, Huang MY, Yeh CS, Chang HJ, Cheng TL, Yen LC, et al. GLUT1 gene is a potential hypoxic marker in colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:241.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Kunkel M, Moergel M, Stockinger M, Jeong JH, Fritz G, Lehr HA, et al. Overexpression of GLUT-1 is associated with resistance to radiotherapy and adverse prognosis in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:796–803.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. De Schutter H, Landuyt W, Verbeken E, Goethals L, Hermans R, Nuyts S. The prognostic value of the hypoxia markers CA IX and GLUT 1 and the cytokines VEGF and IL 6 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated by radiotherapy +/− chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:42.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Luo XM, Zhou SH, Fan J. Glucose transporter-1 as a new therapeutic target in laryngeal carcinoma. J Int Med Res. 2010;38:1885–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Melstrom LG, Salabat MR, Ding XZ, Strouch MJ, Grippo PJ, Mirzoeva S, et al. Apigenin down-regulates the hypoxia response genes: HIF-1alpha, GLUT-1, and VEGF in human pancreatic cancer cells. J Surg Res. 2011;167:173–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Bao YY, Zhou SH, Lu ZJ, Fan J, Huang YP. Inhibiting GLUT-1 expression and PI3K/Akt signaling using apigenin improves the radiosensitivity of laryngeal carcinoma in vivo. Oncol Rep. 2015;34:1805–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Fang J, Bao YY, Zhou SH, Fan J. Apigenin inhibits the proliferation of adenoid cystic carcinoma via suppression of glucose transporter-1. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12:6461–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Erdogan S, Doganlar O, Doganlar ZB, Serttas R, Turkekul K, Dibirdik I, et al. The flavonoid apigenin reduces prostate cancer CD44(+) stem cell survival and migration through PI3K/Akt/NF-kappaB signaling. Life Sci. 2016;162:77–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Liu W, Fang Y, Wang X-T, Liu J, Dan X, Sun L-L. Overcoming 5-Fu resistance of Colon cells through inhibition of Glut1 by the specific inhibitor WZB117. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:7037–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhao F, Ming J, Zhou Y, Fan L. Inhibition of Glut1 by WZB117 sensitizes radioresistant breast cancer cells to irradiation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77:963–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Yan SX, Luo XM, Zhou SH, Bao YY, Fan J, Lu ZJ, et al. Effect of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides glucose transporter-1 on enhancement of radiosensitivity of laryngeal carcinoma. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10:1375–86.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Zhou SH, Fan J, Chen XM, Cheng KJ, Wang SQ. Inhibition of cell proliferation and glucose uptake in human laryngeal carcinoma cells by antisense oligonucleotides against glucose transporter-1. Head neck. 2009;31:1624–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Luo XM, Xu B, Zhou ML, Bao YY, Zhou SH, Fan J, et al. Co-inhibition of GLUT-1 expression and the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to enhance the Radiosensitivity of laryngeal carcinoma xenografts in vivo. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0143306.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Blatt S, Voelxen N, Sagheb K, Pabst AM, Walenta S, Schroeder T, et al. Lactate as a predictive marker for tumor recurrence in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) post radiation: a prospective study over 15 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:2097–104.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Voelxen NF, Blatt S, Knopf P, Henkel M, Appelhans C, Righesso LAR, et al. Comparative metabolic analysis in head and neck cancer and the normal gingiva. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:1033–43.Google Scholar
  97. Fujiwara S, Wada N, Kawano Y, Okuno Y, Kikukawa Y, Endo S, et al. Lactate, a putative survival factor for myeloma cells, is incorporated by myeloma cells through monocarboxylate transporters 1. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2015;4:12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Sandulache VC, Chen Y, Skinner HD, Lu T, Feng L, Court LE, et al. Acute tumor lactate perturbations as a biomarker of genotoxic stress: development of a biochemical model. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:2901–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Harris AL, Sivridis E. Comparison of metabolic pathways between cancer cells and stromal cells in colorectal carcinomas: a metabolic survival role for tumor-associated stroma. Cancer Res. 2006;66:632–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Fischer K, Hoffmann P, Voelkl S, Meidenbauer N, Ammer J, Edinger M, et al. Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood. 2007;109:3812–9.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  101. Feng J, Yang H, Zhang Y, Wei H, Zhu Z, Zhu B, et al. Tumor cell-derived lactate induces TAZ-dependent upregulation of PD-L1 through GPR81 in human lung cancer cells. Oncogene. 2017;36(42):5829–39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Hirschhaeuser F, Sattler UG, Mueller-Klieser W. Lactate: a metabolic key player in cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71:6921–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Halestrap AP. The monocarboxylate transporter family--structure and functional characterization. IUBMB Life. 2012;64:1–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Yan C, Yang F, Zhou C, Chen X, Han X, Liu X, et al. MCT1 promotes the cisplatin-resistance by antagonizing Fas in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:2710–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  105. Hao J, Graham P, Chang L, Ni J, Wasinger V, Beretov J, et al. Proteomic identification of the lactate dehydrogenase a in a radioresistant prostate cancer xenograft mouse model for improving radiotherapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7:74269–85.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  106. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Winter S, Leek R, Sivridis E, Harris AL. Lactate dehydrogenase 5 expression in squamous cell head and neck cancer relates to prognosis following radical or postoperative radiotherapy. Oncology. 2009;77:285–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Panteliadou M, Pouliliou SE, Chondrou PS, Mavropoulou S, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase 5 isoenzyme overexpression defines resistance of prostate cancer to radiotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:2217–23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Koukourakis MI, Kakouratos C, Kalamida D, Bampali Z, Mavropoulou S, Sivridis E, et al. Hypoxia-inducible proteins HIF1alpha and lactate dehydrogenase LDH5, key markers of anaerobic metabolism, relate with stem cell markers and poor post-radiotherapy outcome in bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Biol. 2016;92:353–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Appukuttan A, Flacke JP, Flacke H, Posadowsky A, Reusch HP, Ladilov Y. Inhibition of soluble adenylyl cyclase increases the radiosensitivity of prostate cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1842;2014:2656–63.Google Scholar
  110. He R, Liu P, Xie X, Zhou Y, Liao Q, Xiong W, et al. circGFRA1 and GFRA1 act as ceRNAs in triple negative breast cancer by regulating miR-34a. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36:145.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Li X, Lu P, Li B, Yang R, Chu Y, Zhang Z, et al. Sensitization of hepatocellular carcinoma cells to irradiation by miR34a through targeting lactate dehydrogenaseA. Mol Med Rep. 2016;13:3661–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Harada H. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-mediated characteristic features of cancer cells for tumor radioresistance. J Radiat Res. 2016;57(Suppl 1):i99–i105.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Parks SK, Chiche J, Pouyssegur J. Disrupting proton dynamics and energy metabolism for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:611–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Peitzsch C, Perrin R, Hill RP, Dubrovska A, Kurth I. Hypoxia as a biomarker for radioresistant cancer stem cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 2014;90:636–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Feng H, Wang J, Chen W, Shan B, Guo Y, Xu J, et al. Hypoxia-induced autophagy as an additional mechanism in human osteosarcoma radioresistance. J bone Oncol. 2016;5:67–73.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Lee SL, Ryu H, Son AR, Seo B, Kim J, Jung SY, et al. TGF-beta and Hypoxia/Reoxygenation promote Radioresistance of A549 lung Cancer cells through activation of Nrf2 and EGFR. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:6823471.Google Scholar
  117. Nakashima R, Goto Y, Koyasu S, Kobayashi M, Morinibu A, Yoshimura M, et al. UCHL1-HIF-1 axis-mediated antioxidant property of cancer cells as a therapeutic target for radiosensitization. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6879.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Mandl M, Depping R. Hypoxia-inducible aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) (HIF-1beta): is it a rare exception? Mol Med. 2014;20:215–20.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Mandl M, Lieberum M, Dunst J, Depping R. The expression level of the transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) determines cellular survival after radiation treatment. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:229.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Mandl M, Depping R. ARNT is a potential direct HIF-1 target gene in human Hep3B hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17:77.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Slominski A, Kim TK, Brozyna AA, Janjetovic Z, Brooks DL, Schwab LP, et al. The role of melanogenesis in regulation of melanoma behavior: melanogenesis leads to stimulation of HIF-1alpha expression and HIF-dependent attendant pathways. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014;563:79–93.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Harada H, Kizaka-Kondoh S, Li G, Itasaka S, Shibuya K, Inoue M, et al. Significance of HIF-1-active cells in angiogenesis and radioresistance. Oncogene. 2007;26:7508–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Fu Z, Chen D, Cheng H, Wang F. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha protects cervical carcinoma cells from apoptosis induced by radiation via modulation of vascular endothelial growth factor and p53 under hypoxia. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:318–25.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Moeller BJ, Dreher MR, Rabbani ZN, Schroeder T, Cao Y, Li CY, et al. Pleiotropic effects of HIF-1 blockade on tumor radiosensitivity. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:99–110.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Li XP, Yang XY, Biskup E, Zhou J, Li HL, Wu YF, et al. Co-expression of CXCL8 and HIF-1alpha is associated with metastasis and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6:22880–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  126. Marampon F, Gravina GL, Zani BM, Popov VM, Fratticci A, Cerasani M, et al. Hypoxia sustains glioblastoma radioresistance through ERKs/DNA-PKcs/HIF-1alpha functional interplay. Int J Oncol. 2014;44:2121–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Zhong R, Xu H, Chen G, Zhao G, Gao Y, Liu X, et al. The role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in radiation-induced autophagic cell death in breast cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:7077–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Sun Y, Xing X, Liu Q, Wang Z, Xin Y, Zhang P, et al. Hypoxia-induced autophagy reduces radiosensitivity by the HIF-1alpha/miR-210/Bcl-2 pathway in colon cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2015;46:750–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Zou YM, Hu GY, Zhao XQ, Lu T, Zhu F, Yu SY, et al. Hypoxia-induced autophagy contributes to radioresistance via c-Jun-mediated Beclin1 expression in lung cancer cells. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2014;34:761–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Liang D, Ma Y, Liu J, Trope CG, Holm R, Nesland JM, et al. The hypoxic microenvironment upgrades stem-like properties of ovarian cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:201.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Keith B, Simon MC. Hypoxia-inducible factors, stem cells, and cancer. Cell. 2007;129:465–72.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Wu CT, Lin WY, Chang YH, Chen WC, Chen MF. Impact of CD44 expression on radiation response for bladder cancer. J Cancer. 2017;8:1137–44.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Tsubouchi K, Minami K, Hayashi N, Yokoyama Y, Mori S, Yamamoto H, et al. The CD44 standard isoform contributes to radioresistance of pancreatic cancer cells. J Radiat Res. 2017;58:816–26.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Yae T, Tsuchihashi K, Ishimoto T, Motohara T, Yoshikawa M, Yoshida GJ, et al. Alternative splicing of CD44 mRNA by ESRP1 enhances lung colonization of metastatic cancer cell. Nat Commun. 2012;3:883.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Yoshida GJ, Fuchimoto Y, Osumi T, Shimada H, Hosaka S, Morioka H, et al. Li-Fraumeni syndrome with simultaneous osteosarcoma and liver cancer: increased expression of a CD44 variant isoform after chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:444.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Yoshida GJ. The heterogeneity of cancer stem-like cells at the invasive front. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17:23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Yoshida GJ, Saya H. Inversed relationship between CD44 variant and c-Myc due to oxidative stress-induced canonical Wnt activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;443:622–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Welcker M, Clurman BE. FBW7 ubiquitin ligase: a tumour suppressor at the crossroads of cell division, growth and differentiation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:83–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. de Jong MC, Pramana J, van der Wal JE, Lacko M, Peutz-Kootstra CJ, de Jong JM, et al. CD44 expression predicts local recurrence after radiotherapy in larynx cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5329–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Wang L, Li P, Hu W, Xia Y, Hu C, Liu L, et al. CD44(+)CD24(+) subset of PANC-1 cells exhibits radiation resistance via decreased levels of reactive oxygen species. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:1341–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Pietras A, Katz AM, Ekstrom EJ, Wee B, Halliday JJ, Pitter KL, et al. Osteopontin-CD44 signaling in the glioma perivascular niche enhances cancer stem cell phenotypes and promotes aggressive tumor growth. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14:357–69.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Meijer TW, Kaanders JH, Span PN, Bussink J. Targeting hypoxia, HIF-1, and tumor glucose metabolism to improve radiotherapy efficacy. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:5585–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Kessler J, Hahnel A, Wichmann H, Rot S, Kappler M, Bache M, et al. HIF-1alpha inhibition by siRNA or chetomin in human malignant glioma cells: effects on hypoxic radioresistance and monitoring via CA9 expression. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:605.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Doi N, Ogawa R, Cui ZG, Morii A, Watanabe A, Kanayama S, et al. The acquired radioresistance in HeLa cells under conditions mimicking hypoxia was attenuated by a decreased expression of HIF subunit genes induced by RNA interference. Exp Cell Res. 2015;333:249–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Oommen D, Prise KM. KNK437, abrogates hypoxia-induced radioresistance by dual targeting of the AKT and HIF-1alpha survival pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;421:538–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Mabjeesh NJ, Escuin D, LaVallee TM, Pribluda VS, Swartz GM, Johnson MS, et al. 2ME2 inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis by disrupting microtubules and dysregulating HIF. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:363–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Zhao H, Jiang H, Li Z, Zhuang Y, Liu Y, Zhou S, et al. 2-Methoxyestradiol enhances radiosensitivity in radioresistant melanoma MDA-MB-435R cells by regulating glycolysis via HIF-1alpha/PDK1 axis. Int J Oncol. 2017;50:1531–40.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Wu SL, Li YJ, Liao K, Shi L, Zhang N, Liu S, et al. 2-Methoxyestradiol inhibits the proliferation and migration and reduces the radioresistance of nasopharyngeal carcinoma CNE-2 stem cells via NF-kappaB/HIF-1 signaling pathway inactivation and EMT reversal. Oncol Rep. 2017;37:793–802.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Wang J, Kang M, Wen Q, Qin YT, Wei ZX, Xiao JJ, et al. Berberine sensitizes nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells to radiation through inhibition of Sp1 and EMT. Oncol Rep. 2017;37:2425–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Zhang C, Yang X, Zhang Q, Yang B, Xu L, Qin Q, et al. Berberine radiosensitizes human nasopharyngeal carcinoma by suppressing hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134:185–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Miyasaka A, Oda K, Ikeda Y, Sone K, Fukuda T, Inaba K, et al. PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition overcomes radioresistance via suppression of the HIF1-alpha/VEGF pathway in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138:174–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Zhang C, Yang X, Zhang Q, Guo Q, He J, Qin Q, et al. STAT3 inhibitor NSC74859 radiosensitizes esophageal cancer via the downregulation of HIF-1alpha. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:9793–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Zhang Q, Zhang C, He J, Guo Q, Hu D, Yang X, et al. STAT3 inhibitor stattic enhances radiosensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:2135–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Alsamarai S, Charpidou AG, Matthay RA, Confeld D, Syrigos KN, Saif MW. Pneumonitis related to docetaxel: case report and review of the literature. In Vivo. 2009;23:635–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Oh ET, Kim CW, Kim SJ, Lee JS, Hong SS, Park HJ. Docetaxel induced-JNK2/PHD1 signaling pathway increases degradation of HIF-1alpha and causes cancer cell death under hypoxia. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27382.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Lai KG, Lin YH, Ho CT, Chen CY, Peng CY, Liu TZ, et al. Paclitaxel pretreatment overcomes hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha-induced radioresistance acquisition of human hepatoma and lung adenocarcinoma cells. Life Sci. 2015;136:7–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Yang W, Sun T, Cao J, Liu F, Tian Y, Zhu W. Downregulation of miR-210 expression inhibits proliferation, induces apoptosis and enhances radiosensitivity in hypoxic human hepatoma cells in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 2012;318:944–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Grosso S, Doyen J, Parks SK, Bertero T, Paye A, Cardinaud B, et al. MiR-210 promotes a hypoxic phenotype and increases radioresistance in human lung cancer cell lines. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e544.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  159. Yang W, Wei J, Guo T, Shen Y, Liu F. Knockdown of miR-210 decreases hypoxic glioma stem cells stemness and radioresistance. Exp Cell Res. 2014;326:22–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  160. Song L, Liu S, Zhang L, Yao H, Gao F, Xu D, et al. MiR-21 modulates radiosensitivity of cervical cancer through inhibiting autophagy via the PTEN/Akt/HIF-1alpha feedback loop and the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:12161–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  161. Gu H, Liu M, Ding C, Wang X, Wang R, Wu X, et al. Hypoxia-responsive miR-124 and miR-144 reduce hypoxia-induced autophagy and enhance radiosensitivity of prostate cancer cells via suppressing PIM1. Cancer med. 2016;5:1174–82.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  162. Zhang X, Shi H, Lin S, Ba M, Cui S. MicroRNA-216a enhances the radiosensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells by inhibiting beclin-1-mediated autophagy. Oncol Rep. 2015;34:1557–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  163. Qu JQ, Yi HM, Ye X, Li LN, Zhu JF, Xiao T, et al. MiR-23a sensitizes nasopharyngeal carcinoma to irradiation by targeting IL-8/Stat3 pathway. Oncotarget. 2015;6:28341–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  164. Shen H, Hau E, Joshi S, Dilda PJ, McDonald KL. Sensitization of glioblastoma cells to irradiation by modulating the glucose metabolism. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:1794–804.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  165. Meng MB, Wang HH, Guo WH, Wu ZQ, Zeng XL, Zaorsky NG, et al. Targeting pyruvate kinase M2 contributes to radiosensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2015;356:985–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  166. Yuan S, Qiao T, Zhuang X, Chen W, Xing N, Zhang Q. Knockdown of the M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase (PKM2) with shRNA enhances the effect of docetaxel in human NSCLC cell lines in vitro. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57:1312–23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  167. Liu G, Li YI, Gao X. Overexpression of microRNA-133b sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells to irradiation through the inhibition of glycolysis. Oncol Lett. 2016;11:2903–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  168. Saleem W, Suzuki Y, Mobaraki A, Yoshida Y, Noda S, Saitoh JI, et al. Reduction of nitric oxide level enhances the radiosensitivity of hypoxic non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:2150–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  169. Dong G, Chen Q, Jiang F, Yu D, Mao Q, Xia W, et al. Diisopropylamine dichloroacetate enhances radiosensitization in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by increasing mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species levels. Oncotarget. 2016;7:68170–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  170. Zhong JT, Zhou SH. Warburg effect, hexokinase-II, and radioresistance of laryngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:14133–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Bala M, Goel HC. Modification of low dose radiation induced Radioresistance by 2-deoxy-D-glucose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mechanistic aspects. J Radiat Res. 2007;48:335–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  172. Dwarkanath BS, Zolzer F, Chandana S, Bauch T, Adhikari JS, Muller WU, et al. Heterogeneity in 2-deoxy-D-glucose-induced modifications in energetics and radiation responses of human tumor cell lines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:1051–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  173. Egler V, Korur S, Failly M, Boulay JL, Imber R, Lino MM, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibition and blockade of the glycolytic pathway synergistically induce glioblastoma cell death. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3132–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  174. Cerella C, Dicato M, Diederich M. Modulatory roles of glycolytic enzymes in cell death. Biochem Pharmacol. 2014;92:22–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  175. Lee J. Mitochondrial drug targets in neurodegenerative diseases. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26:714–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  176. Lynam-Lennon N, Maher SG, Maguire A, Phelan J, Muldoon C, Reynolds JV, et al. Altered mitochondrial function and energy metabolism is associated with a radioresistant phenotype in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9:e100738.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  177. Fisher CJ, Goswami PC. Mitochondria-targeted antioxidant enzyme activity regulates radioresistance in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008;7:1271–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  178. Maus F, Sakry D, Biname F, Karram K, Rajalingam K, Watts C, et al. The NG2 proteoglycan protects oligodendrocyte precursor cells against oxidative stress via interaction with OMI/HtrA2. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137311.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  179. Tamari Y, Kashino G, Mori H. Acquisition of radioresistance by IL-6 treatment is caused by suppression of oxidative stress derived from mitochondria after gamma-irradiation. J Radiat Res. 2017;58:412–20.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  180. Chiou J-F, Tai C-J, Wang Y-H, Liu T-Z, Jen Y-M, Shiau C-Y. Sorafenib induces preferential apoptotic killing of a drug- and radio-resistant hep G2 cells through a mitochondria-dependent oxidative stress mechanism. Cancer Biol Ther. 2014;8:1904–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  181. Alphonse G, Bionda C, Aloy MT, Ardail D, Rousson R, Rodriguez-Lafrasse C. Overcoming resistance to gamma-rays in squamous carcinoma cells by poly-drug elevation of ceramide levels. Oncogene. 2004;23:2703–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  182. Tu C, Zeng Z, Qi P, Li X, Yu Z, Guo C, et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of 18 Epstein-Barr Viruses Isolated from Primary Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Biopsy Specimens. J Virol. 2017;91.Google Scholar
  183. You WC, Chiou SH, Huang CY, Chiang SF, Yang CL, Sudhakar JN, et al. Mitochondrial protein ATPase family, AAA domain containing 3A correlates with radioresistance in glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2013;15:1342–52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  184. Candas D, Lu CL, Fan M, Chuang FY, Sweeney C, Borowsky AD, et al. Mitochondrial MKP1 is a target for therapy-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74:7498–509.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  185. Li YL, Chang JT, Lee LY, Fan KH, Lu YC, Li YC, et al. GDF15 contributes to radioresistance and cancer stemness of head and neck cancer by regulating cellular reactive oxygen species via a SMAD-associated signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8:1508–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. Shonai T, Adachi M, Sakata K, Takekawa M, Endo T, Imai K, et al. MEK/ERK pathway protects ionizing radiation-induced loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and cell death in lymphocytic leukemia cells. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9:963–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  187. Dong Q, Sharma S, Liu H, Chen L, Gu B, Sun X, et al. HDAC inhibitors reverse acquired radio resistance of KYSE-150R esophageal carcinoma cells by modulating Bmi-1 expression. Toxicol lett. 2014;224:121–9.Google Scholar
  188. Kuwahara Y, Roudkenar MH, Suzuki M, Urushihara Y, Fukumoto M, Saito Y, et al. The involvement of mitochondrial membrane potential in cross-resistance between radiation and docetaxel. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:556–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  189. O'Rourke B. Mitochondrial ion channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:19–49.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  190. Huang L, Li B, Tang S, Guo H, Li W, Huang X, et al. Mitochondrial KATP channels control glioma Radioresistance by regulating ROS-induced ERK activation. Mol Neurobiol. 2015;52:626–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement