Skip to main content

The role of extracelluar matrix in osteosarcoma progression and metastasis

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy and responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality due to its high rates of pulmonary metastasis. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy has improved 5-year survival rates for patients with localized OS from 20% to over 65%, outcomes for those with metastasis remain dismal. In addition, therapeutic regimens have not significantly improved patient outcomes over the past four decades, and metastases remains a primary cause of death and obstacle in curative therapy. These limitations in care have given rise to numerous works focused on mechanisms and novel targets of OS pathogenesis, including tumor niche factors. OS is notable for its hallmark production of rich extracellular matrix (ECM) of osteoid that goes beyond simple physiological growth support. The aberrant signaling and structural components of the ECM are rich promoters of OS development, and very recent works have shown the specific pathogenic phenotypes induced by these macromolecules. Here we summarize the current developments outlining how the ECM contributes to OS progression and metastasis with supporting mechanisms. We also illustrate the potential of tumorigenic ECM elements as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in the evolving clinical management of OS.

Background

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy and disproportionately affects those in childhood and adolescence [1]. Before the widespread use of chemotherapy in the 1970s, surgical resection was the primary treatment modality available to OS patients [2]. Adjuvant chemotherapy has since dramatically improved the prognosis for OS patients, with the five-year survival rate increased from 20% to approximately 55 to 70% in patients with localized disease [3, 4]. However, in cases of metastatic lesions, the five-year survival rate remains dismal at less than 20% [5]. Targeting and preventing metastasis has thus been a significant obstacle in OS treatment, and recent publications have highlighted various novel treatment strategies to that end. The dysregulation and aberrant remodeling of extracellular matrix (ECM) has gained considerable attention for its promise in pathogenic targeting and predictive value.

Very recently, the tumor microenvironment (TME) has gained prominence outside of its traditional role of cellular support as a veritable contributor to cancer progression and metastasis [6]. The TME, consists of a complex arrangement of blood vessels, fibroblasts, immune cells, endothelial cells, signaling molecules, extracellular vesicles and most importantly, the ECM. The ECM forms a three-dimensional acellular network of macromolecules which provide the necessary structural and biochemical support of its cellular constituents [7,8,9]. In addition to its function as a supportive framework, the ECM regulates most cellular behaviors, including communication, migration, adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [10,11,12]. Furthermore, when aberrant, these functions are hijacked and form a specific ECM remodeling profile that enables metastatic dissemination of cancer cells [13, 14]. These features of ECM transformation have been reported in OS development and progression, a tumor with a characteristically robust ECM [15, 16]. For OS, the generation of pathogenic osteoid matrix and other ECM components enables a supportive scaffold for rapid tumor progression [17, 18] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

ECM changes in OS progression and metastasis. The primary components of ECM in normal bone are significantly changed in osteosarcoma (OS). Due to activated fibroblasts, cancer cells, collagen deposition, fibronectin, and other ECM components, ECM production is dramatically increased which results in a stiffer stroma and more aggressive phenotype. The basement membrane surrounding the primary tumor site is broken down by ECM remodeling enzymes allowing for OS cells from the primary tumor to undergo hematogenous spread where they frequently seed the lung

In this review, we summarize the most recent discoveries of ECM contribution to OS progression and metastasis. We also detail the various ECM components that have shown preclinical and clinical promise as prognostic predictors and therapeutic targets in OS.

ECM components and their function in OS

The ECM is primarily composed of collagen, fibronectin, laminin, and proteo- glycan which shape and maintain tissue vitality [7, 19, 20]. In the pathological state of cancer, however, ECM cultivates tumorigenesis and metastasis in malignancies such as OS [21,22,23,24,25] (Table 1).

Table 1 The ECM components involved in OS

Collagens

Collagens are the main organic components of the ECM and represents approximately 30% of the total protein mass of the human body [56]. The collagen superfamily includes 28 members, each with their own unique three polypeptide chains assembled into a final triple helix structure [57, 58]. Several collagens have been investigated in OS, including collagens I, III, IV, V, and XVIII. The exact changes these collagens undergo are of considerable interest in OS progression especially given their abundance to the OS stroma.

Collagen I

Collagen I is composed of two alpha 1 chains and one alpha 2 chain, which are encoded by the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes, respectively [59]. Collagen I is a rich ECM component and found in connective tissues such as bone, tendon, and ligament [60]. Elevated concentrations of collagen I metabolites have been found in untreated OS patients’ serum [61], and supplementation with exogenous collagen I has shown to increase the synthesis and activation of MMP-2 in OS cell lines [62]. This is of interest, as MMP-2 alone has been shown to promote OS progression, invasion, and migration [26]. Additionally, MMP2 activity is significantly increased in those OS patients with poor response to chemotherapy [63].

Collagen III

Collagen III is composed of three identical peptide chains encoded by the COL3A1 gene and is found throughout cortical bone [64, 65]. A significantly higher level of COL3A1 mRNA expression has been observed in chemoresistant patients compared to those with a more favorable response to therapy [27]. Furthermore, overexpression of COL3A1 in methotrexate-resistant OS cell lines significantly reduces apoptosis via the activity of miR-29abc, a miRNA in the miR-29 family [27].

Collagen IV

Collagen IV is a heterotrimer composed of three different α chains from alpha 1 to alpha 6 [66]. These chains are encoded by the COL4A1- COL4A6 genes. Collagen IV is a major constituent of basement membranes in the ECM and is heavily involved in interaction with other cellular components [67]. In a combined culture system with a 3D OS cell line and 2D endothelial cell line, the endothelial cells formed a vascular network expressing collagen IV. These networks infiltrated the nearby tumor spheroids with tubular structures. These results support the role of collagen IV in regulating OS angiogenesis, a well-known feature of tumor proliferation [28].

Collagen V

Collagen V exists as an alpha1, alpha2, and alpha3 heterotrimer which are encoded by COL5A1, COL5A2, and COL5A3 genes, respectively [68]. While collagen V is a relatively minor component of the ECM, it has critical roles in matrix organization alongside collagen I [69]. Together, the deposition and cross-linking of collagen I and collagen V are the principal components of cultured OS cell ECM [70]. Collagen V is especially important in the cell contact and interactions of OS, as the peptides derived from the basic segment of the alpha 3 chain of collagen V form adhesive qualities [29].

Collagen XVIII

Collagen XVIII contains 10 collagenous domains encoded by the COL18A1 gene [71]. This collagen is a component of basement membranes in the ECM, with structural properties of both collagen and proteoglycan [72]. Proteolytic cleavage within the C-terminal domain of collagen XVIII releases a fragment, endostatin, with anti-angiogenic effects [73]. Endostatin is important in the progression of various tumors, including OS [74, 75]. As angiogenesis is important for OS progression and metastasis, researchers elected to analyze the effects of endostatin in an orthotopic OS model. Results were positive, as their endostatin anti-angiogenic therapy significantly reduced the postoperative progression of pulmonary metastasis [30, 31]. Another study showed a combination of endostatin with Adriamycin produced synergistic inhibition of tumor growth and pulmonary metastases in an orthotopic OS model [32].

Fibronectin

Fibronectin is an adhesive glycoprotein of the ECM composed of two polypeptides which bind integrins, collagen, fibrin, heparin, and proteoglycans [76, 77]. It forms a multidimensional fibrillar matrix with partial control of cell adhesion, migration, and differentiation [78,79,80]. Abundant expression of fibronectin is apparent in OS cell lines [81]. The heparin-binding domain of fibronectin affects cell adhesion and spreading of OS cells by cooperating with the central cell-binding domain of fibronectin [33]. Significant upregulation of fibronectin had been detected in chemo- resistant OS cell lines [36].

Fibronectin displays various functional motifs that interact with integrins, which are the most common transmembrane receptors and regulate its function [82,83,84]. The integrin structure is formed by heterodimers of α and β subunits which penetrate the cell membrane and form several cytoplasmic domains [85]. The binding of fibronectin with integrins represents a crucial step in OS progression and metastasis [37, 38]. In a recent in vitro work, integrins were shown to be involved not only in cell adhesion but also in the binding and assembly of exogenous fibronectin [34]. Selective down-regulation of integrins resulted in the decreased deposition of fibronectin within the ECM and subsequently reduced overall OS cell spreading and adhesion [39]. Conversely, upregulation of integrins enhanced adhesiveness of OS cells to fibronectin [35].

Laminins

Laminins are components of the basement membrane in ECM and are constructed of heterotrimeric glycoproteins with alpha, beta, and gamma chain subunits [86, 87]. They interact with their respective cancer cell receptors whereby they promote angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis [88]. Laminins have demonstrated to enhance cell adhesion in OS cell lines [40], with high laminin-adherent OS cells showing notably more invasiveness than their low laminin-adherent counterparts [41]. In a work which implemented a 3D OS cell line model, a matrix supplemented with laminin led to an increased invasion of OS cells into the surrounding acellular bone marrow environment [42].

Proteoglycans

Proteoglycans are heavily dispersed throughout the ECM and are composed of glycosylated proteins with a protein core and covalently attached glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains [89, 90]. The GAGs are major regulators of metastasis in various cancers [91,92,93]. Hyaluronic acid (HA), also known as hyaluronan or hyaluronate, is another macromolecule that belongs to the GAG family. HA is abundant in most tissues and has unique properties as a result of its variable covalent bonding and core proteins [90, 94]. And although HA is not a true proteoglycan, it possesses similar biological functions. It is synthesized on the cytoplasmic membrane and is directly secreted into the ECM [95]. Based on the core protein and GAG chain properties, proteoglycans are classified into one of three groups, including small leucine-rich proteoglycans (SLRPs), modular proteoglycans, and cell-surface proteoglycans [90]. Overall, these unique variants have roles in ECM communication, tumor angiogenesis, progression, and metastasis [96, 97].

SLRPs

SLRPs have relatively short protein cores with a central domain of leucine-rich repeats [98]. The SLRP family is divided into five classes according to structure and includes classes I to V [99, 100]. Functionally, these proteins regulate ECM organization and cell behavior [101]. Of the SLRP family members, biglycan, decorin, and lumican have been investigated in OS.

Biglycan is a class I SLRP encoded by the BGN gene which promotes proliferation and differentiation in OS cells [43, 102]. A mechanistic study has revealed biglycan enhances OS cell growth through the low-density lipoprotein receptor- related protein 6 /β-catenin/IGF-I receptor signaling pathway [44].

Decorin is another class I SLRP and a small pericellular matrix proteoglycan with a structure closely related to biglycan. That is where their similarities end, however, as its presence negatively correlates with oncogenesis. Decorin inhibits OS cell migration through its glycosaminoglycan side chains [45, 103]. Ectopic expression of decorin significantly decreased OS cell growth through the induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor P21 [46].

Lumican is a class II SLRPs and encoded by the LUM gene [104]. It positively correlates with OS cell differentiation and inversely correlated with growth [47]. In a subsequent study, lumican was shown to regulate OS cell adhesion by modulating transforming growth factor beta-2 activity [48].

Modular proteoglycans

Modular proteoglycans are multidomain motif proteins with a highly glycosylated structure [105]. They are subdivided into families of HA-binding, lectin-binding, and non-HA-binding proteoglycans [90, 96]. The four proteoglycans versican, aggrecan, neurocan, and brevican constitute the family of HA-binding proteoglycans [106]. Versican is notable for its ability to regulate cellular processes including adhesion, proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion [107, 108]. High expression of versican has been found in OS tissues relative to normal tissues [49]. Its expression is up-regulated by transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGFß1), which leads to enhanced OS cell migration and invasion [49].

Ha

As previously stated, HAs have similar functions to proteoglycans [94]. They exist in all tissues and are abundant in bone [109]. In addition to their structural importance, HAs have strong roles in cancer cell differentiation, proliferation, and migration when aberrantly expressed [94]. HA promotes OS cell proliferation and invasion by initiating intracellular signal transduction [50]. In a work where HA accumulation was selectively inhibited, there was a substantial decrease in OS cell proliferation, motility, and invasiveness [51]. The inhibition of HA can also reduce cell viability and induce apoptosis in OS cells [53]. At the microscopic level, cells interact with HA through cell surface receptors, which initiates their actions. The cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44) is a well-known cell membrane receptor for HA. When HA is bound to CD44, it regulates cell-cell interactions, cell adhesion, and migration [110]. The HA-CD44 pathway increases tumor aggression and drug resistance as well as influencing the cancer stem cell phenotype through promoting stem-cell gene expression, progression, and metastasis [111]. Of note, the expression of CD44 is significantly higher in metastatic and recurrent OS patient tumor specimens compared to primary tumor tissues [54]. Therapeutically, the proliferation and spheroid formation of OS cells is inhibited in 3-D culture when CD44 is silenced [52]. In an orthotopic mouse model of OS, injection with CD44 overexpressing OS cells resulted in increased primary tumor formation and lung metastasis, which was dependent on the HA to CD44 interaction [55].

Signaling pathways responsible for ECM remodeling in OS

The function of ECM is derived from its diverse composition of macromolecules, proteases, inhibitors, and their respective downstream signaling pathways [112]. Within the ECM of OS, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and heparinases regulate several pathways responsible for progression and metastasis (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Schematic of signaling pathways involved the ECM remodeling in OS. The ECM is dynamically remodeled by multiple proteases and signaling pathways. In OS, MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-13 function via PI3K/Akt and ERK associated signaling pathways. Heparanase also participates in ECM remodeling, as it cleaves the ECM by heparan sulfate degradation, thus promoting OS cell invasion and metastasis

MMPs

MMPs are proteolytic enzymes that degrade surrounding ECM components, release active growth factors, and promote tumor angiogenesis [113]. Elevated levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-13 exist in OS (Fig. 2) and contribute to cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. The upstream PI3K/Akt signaling pathway promotes the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9, thus degrading ECM and enabling OS cell invasion and metastasis [114, 115]. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway also upregulates MMP-2 and MMP-9 and migratory activity of OS cells [116, 117]. Another MMP, MMP-13, causes turnover of ECM collagens and proteoglycans and directly correlates with OS progression. In one recent study, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 was shown to upregulate the expression of MMP-13 and promote invasion and lung metastasis in an OS mouse model [118].

Heparanase

Heparanase is an endo-β-D-glucuronidase that cleaves heparan sulfate chains in the ECM, thus releasing heparan sulfate-binding angiogenic factors and allowing for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis [119, 120] (Fig. 2). Previous works have shown the down-regulation of heparanase significantly reduces OS cell proliferation and invasion [121, 122]. Additionally, OS patient tissues with more heparanase correlate with higher microvessel density and rates of pulmonary metastasis [122].

ECM components as prognostic biomarkers in OS

Although the adoption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in OS has significantly improved patient survival since its implementation several decades ago, outcomes have since plateaued. The personalized and immunotherapies that have shown great promise in several cancers have had less favorable results for OS, likely due in part to its heterogeneity between patients. There is, therefore, an urgent need for prognostic biomarkers which allow for the delineation of patients according to their unique tumor microenvironments and response patterns, so that their therapeutic regimens can be tailored accordingly. In response, there has been an expansion of works investigating the components of the ECM, some of which have been found to play vital roles in cancer progression, metastasis, and clinical outcomes [123,124,125]. An emergence of clinical data has revealed various collagens to correlate with the clinical stage, metastasis, and outcomes [126]. The correlation between ECM makeup with clinical stage and prognosis in OS are summarized (Table 2). Several noteworthy examples exist, including the expression of collagen triple helix repeat containing 1 (CTHRC1) protein in OS. It has significantly higher expression compared to adjacent normal tissue controls, and predicts a poor prognosis of OS patients [127]. Functionally, CTHRC1 is a secretory protein known to regulate vascular remodeling and bone formation [128]. A collagen I (COL1A1) polymorphism is associated with OS susceptibility and death [129]. Fibronectin is overexpressed in OS specimens compared to osteochondroma as well as other tissues [130, 131]. Additionally, overexpression of fibronectin in OS tissues is associated with a poorer chemo- therapeutic response, distant metastasis, and shorter overall survival [130, 131]. In short, these works support high fibronectin expression as an underlying mechanism of aggressive clinical behavior in OS. A higher level of CD44 expression in OS tissues is apparent in patients with shorter survival and those with an unfavorable response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy [54]. Furthermore, CD44 expression is predictive of poor survival, metastasis, recurrence, and drug resistance in patients with OS [132, 133].

Table 2 ECM as prognostic predictors in OS

ECM components as potential therapeutic targets in OS

The ECM is pivotal in OS pathogenesis, especially in tumor cell migration and invasion. Targeting the regulatory and responsible molecules within the ECM has thus been explored as a novel strategy for OS treatment (Table 3).

Table 3 ECM as therapeutic targets in OS

Collagen targets

Overexpression of COL3A1 can decrease apoptosis and promote methotrexate resistance in OS cell lines. The precise targeting of COL3A1 is therefore a promising and personalized strategy for overcoming methotrexate resistance in candidate OS tumors [27]. The antiangiogenic protein fragment tumstatin, which is cleaved from collagen, is the non-collagenous domain of the alpha 3 chain in collagen IV shown to inhibit cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis in OS cell lines [134]. Mechanistically, this occurs through the phosphorylation of p65NF-κB and its subsequent nuclear translocation [135]. Tumstatin has therefore become of interest in the treatment of OS [135]. Endostatin combined with other chemotherapy has been evaluated in an OS clinical trial, with results showing a significant reduction in angiogenesis, metastasis, and an increased event-free survival rate [136]. Overall, endostatin-targeting angiogenesis-based therapy has yielded positive results for OS patients at the clinical trial level.

Fibronectin targets

The fibronectin and integrin families within the ECM regulate a diverse array of cellular functions crucial for proliferation, progression, and metastasis [137]. Therapeutically, fibronectin inhibition greatly increases OS sensitivity to doxorubicin in vitro. Similarly, fibronectin knockdown decreases the tumor growth rate and can even resensitize OS to doxorubicin in orthotopic OS models [36]. Consequently, targeting fibronectin has become a promising treatment for doxorubicin-resistant OS [36]. As the main receptor of fibronectin, integrins are also proposed targets of cancer treatment. Several studies have shown inhibition of integrin or its downstream effectors to block many of the major hallmarks of cancer [137,138,139]. Additionally, selective knockdown of integrins significantly inhibits OS growth and lung metastasis, and an exogenous reintroduction of integrins can restore cell proliferation and lung metastasis in xenograft models of OS [140]. As pulmonary metastasis is the major cause of patient death in OS, these findings are especially promising and warrant future works.

Proteoglycans targets

In a murine OS model, significantly fewer pulmonary metastases and longer survival times were observed in mice treated with decorin, a matrix proteoglycan. The works of these investigations support decorin as a potential therapeutic target in the prevention of lung metastasis in OS [141]. As previously described, CD44 is important in OS progression. Furthermore, it is the direct target of miR-199a-3p, which is a significantly downregulated miRNA in OS [142, 143]. As a therapeutic strategy, overexpression of miR-199a-3p significantly inhibits CD44 expression in OS cell lines, with transfection also increasing chemosensitivity. Taken together, these results support targeting CD44 to reduce pulmonary metastasis and increase OS clinical outcomes [54].

Conclusion and future perspectives

In addition to is physiologic importance in structural and biochemical support, the ECM has gained increased recognition for its carcinogenic roles, including in the progression and metastasis of OS. The various components of the ECM including collagens, fibronectin, laminins, and proteoglycans may contribute to OS progression and metastasis through distinct and intertwining mechanisms. It is therefore important to further study and validate the ECM components, cellular receptors, and associated signaling pathways in OS synergistically and as components of the primary tumor tissue. Novel culture systems will be especially important in this endeavor, as resembling the in vivo tumor microenvironment with in vitro customizability, such as with 3D cell culture, will be necessary to accurately model extracellular matrix and growth. Overall, the ECM components have shown promise as clinical biomarkers and therapeutic targets in OS, and warrant a continued evaluation in preclinical models as well as future clinical trials.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

OS:

Osteosarcoma

TME:

Tumor microenvironment

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

GAG:

Glycosaminoglycan

HA:

Hyaluronic acid

SLRPs:

Small leucine-rich proteoglycans

CTHRC1:

Collagen triple helix repeat containing 1

MMPs:

Matrix metalloproteinases

References

  1. 1.

    Sampson VB, Yoo S, Kumar A, Vetter NS, Kolb EA. MicroRNAs and potential targets in osteosarcoma: review. Front Pediatr. 2015;3:69.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Marcove RC, Mike V, Hajek JV, Levin AG, Hutter RV. Osteogenic sarcoma under the age of twenty-one. A review of one hundred and forty-five operative cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(3):411–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Shin SH, Jeong HJ, Han I, Cho HS, Kim HS. Osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma of the shoulder: site-specific comparative analysis. Orthopedics. 2013;36(2):e179–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sampo M, Koivikko M, Taskinen M, Kallio P, Kivioja A, Tarkkanen M, Bohling T. Incidence, epidemiology and treatment results of osteosarcoma in Finland - a nationwide population-based study. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(8):1206–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Guo J, Reddick WE, Glass JO, Ji Q, Billups CA, Wu J, Hoffer FA, Kaste SC, Jenkins JJ, Ortega Flores XC, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic factor in predicting event-free and overall survival in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma. Cancer. 2012;118(15):3776–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19(11):1423–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Theocharis AD, Skandalis SS, Gialeli C, Karamanos NK. Extracellular matrix structure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;97:4–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bonnans C, Chou J, Werb Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(12):786–801.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Michel G, Tonon T, Scornet D, Cock JM, Kloareg B. The cell wall polysaccharide metabolism of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus. Insights into the evolution of extracellular matrix polysaccharides in eukaryotes. New Phytol. 2010;188(1):82–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 24):4195–200.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lu P, Takai K, Weaver VM, Werb Z. Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(12):a005058.

  12. 12.

    Hynes RO. The extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils. Science (New York, NY). 2009;326(5957):1216–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Levental KR, Yu H, Kass L, Lakins JN, Egeblad M, Erler JT, Fong SF, Csiszar K, Giaccia A, Weninger W, et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell. 2009;139(5):891–906.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Erler JT, Bennewith KL, Cox TR, Lang G, Bird D, Koong A, Le QT, Giaccia AJ. Hypoxia-induced lysyl oxidase is a critical mediator of bone marrow cell recruitment to form the premetastatic niche. Cancer Cell. 2009;15(1):35–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ehnman M, Larsson O. Microenvironmental targets in sarcoma. Front Oncol. 2015;5:248.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Raimondi L, De Luca A, Gallo A, Costa V, Russelli G, Cuscino N, Manno M, Raccosta S, Carina V, Bellavia D, et al. Osteosarcoma cell-derived exosomes affect tumor microenvironment by specific packaging of microRNAs. Carcinogenesis. 2020;41(5):666–77.

  17. 17.

    Zheng Y, Wang G, Chen R, Hua Y, Cai Z. Mesenchymal stem cells in the osteosarcoma microenvironment: their biological properties, influence on tumor growth, and therapeutic implications. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Borovski T, De Sousa EMF, Vermeulen L, Medema JP. Cancer stem cell niche: the place to be. Cancer Res. 2011;71(3):634–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Singh B, Fleury C, Jalalvand F, Riesbeck K. Human pathogens utilize host extracellular matrix proteins laminin and collagen for adhesion and invasion of the host. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36(6):1122–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Halper J, Kjaer M. Basic components of connective tissues and extracellular matrix: elastin, fibrillin, fibulins, fibrinogen, fibronectin, laminin, tenascins and thrombospondins. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;802:31–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhang Y, Wei L, Yu J, Li G, Zhang X, Wang A, He Y, Li H, Yin D. Targeting of the beta6 gene to suppress degradation of ECM via inactivation of the MAPK pathway in breast adenocarcinoma cells. Oncol Rep. 2014;32(5):1787–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Saviola AJ, Burns PD, Mukherjee AK, Mackessy SP. The disintegrin tzabcanin inhibits adhesion and migration in melanoma and lung cancer cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;88:457–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yang B, Tang F, Zhang B, Zhao Y, Feng J, Rao Z. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 overexpression is closely related to poor prognosis in patients with colon cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gou X, Chen H, Jin F, Wu W, Li Y, Long J, Gong X, Luo M, Bi T, Li Z, et al. Expressions of CD147, MMP-2 and MMP-9 in laryngeal carcinoma and its correlation with poor prognosis. Pathol Oncol Res. 2014;20(2):475–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Li TY, Xu LY, Wu ZY, Liao LD, Shen JH, Xu XE, Du ZP, Zhao Q, Li EM. Reduced nuclear and ectopic cytoplasmic expression of lysyl oxidase-like 2 is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2012;43(7):1068–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Korpi JT, Hagstrom J, Lehtonen N, Parkkinen J, Sorsa T, Salo T, Laitinen M. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases-2, −8, −13, −26, and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1 in human osteosarcoma. Surg Oncol. 2011;20(1):e18–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Xu W, Li Z, Zhu X, Xu R, Xu Y. miR-29 family inhibits resistance to methotrexate and promotes cell apoptosis by targeting COL3A1 and MCL1 in osteosarcoma. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:8812–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chaddad H, Kuchler-Bopp S, Fuhrmann G, Gegout H, Ubeaud-Sequier G, Schwinte P, Bornert F, Benkirane-Jessel N, Idoux-Gillet Y. Combining 2D angiogenesis and 3D osteosarcoma microtissues to improve vascularization. Exp Cell Res. 2017;360(2):138–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yamaguchi K, Matsuo N, Sumiyoshi H, Fujimoto N, Iyama KI, Yanagisawa S, Yoshioka H. Pro-alpha3(V) collagen chain is expressed in bone and its basic N-terminal peptide adheres to osteosarcoma cells. Matrix Biol. 2005;24(4):283–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Dutour A, Monteil J, Paraf F, Charissoux JL, Kaletta C, Sauer B, Naujoks K, Rigaud M. Endostatin cDNA/cationic liposome complexes as a promising therapy to prevent lung metastases in osteosarcoma: study in a human-like rat orthotopic tumor. Mol Ther. 2005;11(2):311–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kaya M, Wada T, Nagoya S, Yamashita T. Prevention of postoperative progression of pulmonary metastases in osteosarcoma by antiangiogenic therapy using endostatin. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12(6):562–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Xu H, Niu X, Zhang Q, Hao L, Ding Y, Liu W, Yao L. Synergistic antitumor efficacy by combining adriamycin with recombinant human endostatin in an osteosarcoma model. Oncol Lett. 2011;2(5):773–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kang W, Park S, Jang JH. Kinetic and functional analysis of the heparin-binding domain of fibronectin. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30(1):55–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fogerty FJ, Akiyama SK, Yamada KM, Mosher DF. Inhibition of binding of fibronectin to matrix assembly sites by anti-integrin (alpha 5 beta 1) antibodies. J Cell Biol. 1990;111(2):699–708.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yang RS, Chiang HS, Tang CH, Yeh CS, Huang TF. Rhodostomin inhibits thrombin-enhanced adhesion of ROS 17/2.8 cells through the blockade of alphavbeta3 integrin. Toxicon. 2005;46(4):387–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kun-Peng Z, Chun-Lin Z, Xiao-Long M, Lei Z. Fibronectin-1 modulated by the long noncoding RNA OIP5-AS1/miR-200b-3p axis contributes to doxorubicin resistance of osteosarcoma cells. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(5):6927–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gvozdenovic A, Boro A, Meier D, Bode-Lesniewska B, Born W, Muff R, Fuchs B. Targeting alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 integrins inhibits pulmonary metastasis in an intratibial xenograft osteosarcoma mouse model. Oncotarget. 2016;7(34):55141–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sun Z, Schwenzer A, Rupp T, Murdamoothoo D, Vegliante R, Lefebvre O, Klein A, Hussenet T, Orend G. Tenascin-C promotes tumor cell migration and metastasis through integrin alpha9beta1-mediated YAP inhibition. Cancer Res. 2018;78(4):950–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Boregowda RK, Krovic BM, Ritty TM. Selective integrin subunit reduction disrupts fibronectin extracellular matrix deposition and fibrillin 1 gene expression. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012;369(1–2):205–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Min SK, Kang HK, Jang DH, Jung SY, Kim OB, Min BM, Yeo IS. Titanium surface coating with a laminin-derived functional peptide promotes bone cell adhesion. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:638348.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Yudoh K, Matsui H, Kanamori M, Ohmori K, Yasuda T, Tsuji H. Characteristics of high and low laminin-adherent Dunn osteosarcoma cells selected by adhesiveness to laminin. Correlation between invasiveness through the extracellular matrix and pulmonary metastatic potential. Tumour Biol. 1996;17(6):332–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pavlou M, Shah M, Gikas P, Briggs T, Roberts SJ, Cheema U. Osteomimetic matrix components alter cell migration and drug response in a 3D tumour-engineered osteosarcoma model. Acta Biomater. 2019;96:247–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ungefroren H, Cikos T, Krull NB, Kalthoff H. Biglycan gene promoter activity in osteosarcoma cells is regulated by cyclic AMP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;235(2):413–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Aggelidakis J, Berdiaki A, Nikitovic D, Papoutsidakis A, Papachristou DJ, Tsatsakis AM, Tzanakakis GN. Biglycan regulates MG63 osteosarcoma cell growth through a LPR6/beta-catenin/IGFR-IR signaling Axis. Front Oncol. 2018;8:470.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Merle B, Durussel L, Delmas PD, Clezardin P. Decorin inhibits cell migration through a process requiring its glycosaminoglycan side chain. J Cell Biochem. 1999;75(3):538–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Santra M, Mann DM, Mercer EW, Skorski T, Calabretta B, Iozzo RV. Ectopic expression of decorin protein core causes a generalized growth suppression in neoplastic cells of various histogenetic origin and requires endogenous p21, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases. J Clin Invest. 1997;100(1):149–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Nikitovic D, Berdiaki A, Zafiropoulos A, Katonis P, Tsatsakis A, Karamanos NK, Tzanakakis GN. Lumican expression is positively correlated with the differentiation and negatively with the growth of human osteosarcoma cells. FEBS J. 2008;275(2):350–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Nikitovic D, Chalkiadaki G, Berdiaki A, Aggelidakis J, Katonis P, Karamanos NK, Tzanakakis GN. Lumican regulates osteosarcoma cell adhesion by modulating TGFbeta2 activity. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43(6):928–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Li F, Li S, Cheng T. TGF-beta1 promotes osteosarcoma cell migration and invasion through the miR-143-versican pathway. Cellular Physiol Biochem. 2014;34(6):2169–79.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Tofuku K, Yokouchi M, Murayama T, Minami S, Komiya S. HAS3-related hyaluronan enhances biological activities necessary for metastasis of osteosarcoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2006;29(1):175–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Nishida Y, Knudson W, Knudson CB, Ishiguro N. Antisense inhibition of hyaluronan synthase-2 in human osteosarcoma cells inhibits hyaluronan retention and tumorigenicity. Exp Cell Res. 2005;307(1):194–203.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Liu T, Yan Z, Liu Y, Choy E, Hornicek FJ, Mankin H, Duan Z. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated silencing of CD44 in human highly metastatic osteosarcoma cells. Cellular Physiol Biochem. 2018;46(3):1218–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hosono K, Nishida Y, Knudson W, Knudson CB, Naruse T, Suzuki Y, Ishiguro N. Hyaluronan oligosaccharides inhibit tumorigenicity of osteosarcoma cell lines MG-63 and LM-8 in vitro and in vivo via perturbation of hyaluronan-rich pericellular matrix of the cells. Am J Pathol. 2007;171(1):274–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gao Y, Feng Y, Shen JK, Lin M, Choy E, Cote GM, Harmon DC, Mankin HJ, Hornicek FJ, Duan Z. CD44 is a direct target of miR-199a-3p and contributes to aggressive progression in osteosarcoma. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11365.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Gvozdenovic A, Arlt MJ, Campanile C, Brennecke P, Husmann K, Li Y, Born W, Muff R, Fuchs B. CD44 enhances tumor formation and lung metastasis in experimental osteosarcoma and is an additional predictor for poor patient outcome. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(4):838–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Myllyharju J, Kivirikko KI. Collagens, modifying enzymes and their mutations in humans, flies and worms. Trends Genet. 2004;20(1):33–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Ricard-Blum S. The collagen family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(1):a004978.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bella J, Hulmes DJ. Fibrillar Collagens. Subcell Biochem. 2017;82:457–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Exposito JY, Valcourt U, Cluzel C, Lethias C. The fibrillar collagen family. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(2):407–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Brodsky B, Persikov AV. Molecular structure of the collagen triple helix. Adv Protein Chem. 2005;70:301–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Wiklund T, Blomqvist C, Risteli L, Risteli J, Karaharju E, Elomaa I. Type I and type III collagen metabolites in adult osteosarcoma patients. Br J Cancer. 1996;73(1):106–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Elenjord R, Allen JB, Johansen HT, Kildalsen H, Svineng G, Maelandsmo GM, Loennechen T, Winberg JO. Collagen I regulates matrix metalloproteinase-2 activation in osteosarcoma cells independent of S100A4. FEBS J. 2009;276(18):5275–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kunz P, Sahr H, Lehner B, Fischer C, Seebach E, Fellenberg J. Elevated ratio of MMP2/MMP9 activity is associated with poor response to chemotherapy in osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:223.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G. Type III collagen (COL3A1): gene and protein structure, tissue distribution, and associated diseases. Gene. 2019;707:151–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Keene DR, Sakai LY, Burgeson RE. Human bone contains type III collagen, type VI collagen, and fibrillin: type III collagen is present on specific fibers that may mediate attachment of tendons, ligaments, and periosteum to calcified bone cortex. J Histochem Cytochem. 1991;39(1):59–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Chioran A, Duncan S, Catalano A, Brown TJ, Ringuette MJ. Collagen IV trafficking: the inside-out and beyond story. Dev Biol. 2017;431(2):124–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Khoshnoodi J, Pedchenko V, Hudson BG. Mammalian collagen IV. Microsc Res Tech. 2008;71(5):357–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Gelse K, Poschl E, Aigner T. Collagens--structure, function, and biosynthesis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(12):1531–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Mak KM, Png CY, Lee DJ. Type V collagen in health, disease, and fibrosis. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2016;299(5):613–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Fernandes RJ, Harkey MA, Weis M, Askew JW, Eyre DR. The post-translational phenotype of collagen synthesized by SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells. Bone. 2007;40(5):1343–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Passos-Bueno MR, Suzuki OT, Armelin-Correa LM, Sertie AL, Errera FI, Bagatini K, Kok F, Leite KR. Mutations in collagen 18A1 and their relevance to the human phenotype. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2006;78(1):123–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Heljasvaara R, Aikio M, Ruotsalainen H, Pihlajaniemi T. Collagen XVIII in tissue homeostasis and dysregulation - lessons learned from model organisms and human patients. Matrix Biol. 2017;57-58:55–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Marneros AG, Olsen BR. Physiological role of collagen XVIII and endostatin. FASEB J. 2005;19(7):716–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Ackley BD, Crew JR, Elamaa H, Pihlajaniemi T, Kuo CJ, Kramer JM. The NC1/endostatin domain of Caenorhabditis elegans type XVIII collagen affects cell migration and axon guidance. J Cell Biol. 2001;152(6):1219–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Abd El-Rehim DM, Osman NA. Expression of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 8 and endostatin in human osteosarcoma: implication in tumor progression and prognosis. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2015;27(1):1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Mouw JK, Ou G, Weaver VM. Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(12):771–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Pietrocola G, Rindi S, Nobile G, Speziale P. Purification of human plasma/cellular Fibronectin and Fibronectin fragments. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1627:309–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Wierzbicka-Patynowski I, Schwarzbauer JE. The ins and outs of fibronectin matrix assembly. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(Pt 16):3269–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Henderson B, Nair S, Pallas J, Williams MA. Fibronectin: a multidomain host adhesin targeted by bacterial fibronectin-binding proteins. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35(1):147–200.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Cseh B, Fernandez-Sauze S, Grall D, Schaub S, Doma E, Van Obberghen-Schilling E. Autocrine fibronectin directs matrix assembly and crosstalk between cell-matrix and cell-cell adhesion in vascular endothelial cells. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 22):3989–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kilian O, Dahse R, Alt V, Zardi L, Rosenhahn J, Exner U, Battmann A, Schnettler R, Kosmehl H. Expression of EDA+ and EDB+ fibronectin splice variants in bone. Bone. 2004;35(6):1334–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Singh P, Carraher C, Schwarzbauer JE. Assembly of fibronectin extracellular matrix. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2010;26:397–419.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Kechagia JZ, Ivaska J, Roca-Cusachs P. Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(8):457–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Bokel C, Brown NH. Integrins in development: moving on, responding to, and sticking to the extracellular matrix. Dev Cell. 2002;3(3):311–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Nermut MV, Green NM, Eason P, Yamada SS, Yamada KM. Electron microscopy and structural model of human fibronectin receptor. EMBO J. 1988;7(13):4093–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Hamill KJ, Kligys K, Hopkinson SB, Jones JC. Laminin deposition in the extracellular matrix: a complex picture emerges. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 24):4409–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Colognato H, Yurchenco PD. Form and function: the laminin family of heterotrimers. Developmental Dynamics. 2000;218(2):213–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Patarroyo M, Tryggvason K, Virtanen I. Laminin isoforms in tumor invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2002;12(3):197–207.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Hynes RO, Naba A. Overview of the matrisome--an inventory of extracellular matrix constituents and functions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(1):a004903.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Schaefer L, Schaefer RM. Proteoglycans: from structural compounds to signaling molecules. Cell Tissue Res. 2010;339(1):237–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Sasisekharan R, Shriver Z, Venkataraman G, Narayanasami U. Roles of heparan-sulphate glycosaminoglycans in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(7):521–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Afratis N, Gialeli C, Nikitovic D, Tsegenidis T, Karousou E, Theocharis AD, Pavao MS, Tzanakakis GN, Karamanos NK. Glycosaminoglycans: key players in cancer cell biology and treatment. FEBS J. 2012;279(7):1177–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Iozzo RV, Sanderson RD. Proteoglycans in cancer biology, tumour microenvironment and angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15(5):1013–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Toole BP. Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to pericellular cue. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(7):528–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Jiang D, Liang J, Noble PW. Hyaluronan as an immune regulator in human diseases. Physiol Rev. 2011;91(1):221–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Proteoglycan form and function: a comprehensive nomenclature of proteoglycans. Matrix Biol. 2015;42:11–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Xu L, Tang L, Zhang L. Proteoglycans as miscommunication biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2019;162:59–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Kobe B, Kajava AV. The leucine-rich repeat as a protein recognition motif. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001;11(6):725–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Biological functions of the small leucine-rich proteoglycans: from genetics to signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(31):21305–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Igwe JC, Gao Q, Kizivat T, Kao WW, Kalajzic I. Keratocan is expressed by osteoblasts and can modulate osteogenic differentiation. Connect Tissue Res. 2011;52(5):401–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Chen S, Birk DE. The regulatory roles of small leucine-rich proteoglycans in extracellular matrix assembly. FEBS J. 2013;280(10):2120–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Traupe H, van den Ouweland AM, van Oost BA, Vogel W, Vetter U, Warren ST, Rocchi M, Darlison MG, Ropers HH. Fine mapping of the human biglycan (BGN) gene within the Xq28 region employing a hybrid cell panel. Genomics. 1992;13(2):481–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Pulkkinen L, Alitalo T, Krusius T, Peltonen L. Expression of decorin in human tissues and cell lines and defined chromosomal assignment of the gene locus (DCN). Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1992;60(2):107–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Chakravarti S, Stallings RL, SundarRaj N, Cornuet PK, Hassell JR. Primary structure of human lumican (keratan sulfate proteoglycan) and localization of the gene (LUM) to chromosome 12q21.3-q22. Genomics. 1995;27(3):481–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Iozzo RV, Murdoch AD. Proteoglycans of the extracellular environment: clues from the gene and protein side offer novel perspectives in molecular diversity and function. FASEB J. 1996;10(5):598–614.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Aspberg A. The different roles of aggrecan interaction domains. J Histochem Cytochem. 2012;60(12):987–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Harten IA, Kaber G, Agarwal KJ, Kang I, Ibarrientos SR, Workman G, Chan CK, Nivison MP, Nagy N, Braun KR, et al. The synthesis and secretion of versican isoform V3 by mammalian cells: a role for N-linked glycosylation. Matrix Biol. 2020;89:27–42.

  108. 108.

    Ricciardelli C, Sakko AJ, Ween MP, Russell DL, Horsfall DJ. The biological role and regulation of versican levels in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009;28(1–2):233–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Liang J, Jiang D, Noble PW. Hyaluronan as a therapeutic target in human diseases. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;97:186–203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Feng S, Wu ZX, Zhao Z, Liu J, Sun K, Guo C, Wang H, Wu Z. Engineering of bone- and CD44-dual-targeting redox-sensitive liposomes for the treatment of Orthotopic osteosarcoma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(7):7357–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Caon I, Bartolini B, Parnigoni A, Carava E, Moretto P, Viola M, Karousou E, Vigetti D, Passi A. Revisiting the hallmarks of cancer: the role of hyaluronan. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;62:9–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Sanderson RD, Bandari SK, Vlodavsky I. Proteases and glycosidases on the surface of exosomes: newly discovered mechanisms for extracellular remodeling. Matrix Biol. 2019;75-76:160–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science (New York, NY). 2009;324(5935):1673–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Kuan YH, Huang FM, Li YC, Chang YC. Proinflammatory activation of macrophages by bisphenol A-glycidyl-methacrylate involved NFκB activation via PI3K/Akt pathway. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(11):4003–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Felx M, Guyot MC, Isler M, Turcotte RE, Doyon J, Khatib AM, Leclerc S, Moreau A, Moldovan F. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) promotes MMP-2 and MMP-9 induction involving the transcription factor NF-kappaB in human osteosarcoma. Clin Sci (Lond). 2006;110(6):645–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Poudel B, Kim DK, Ki HH, Kwon YB, Lee YM, Kim DK. Downregulation of ERK signaling impairs U2OS osteosarcoma cell migration in collagen matrix by suppressing MMP9 production. Oncol Lett. 2014;7(1):215–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Cheng G, Gao F, Sun X, Bi H, Zhu Y. Paris saponin VII suppresses osteosarcoma cell migration and invasion by inhibiting MMP-2/9 production via the p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14(4):3199–205.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Hirahata M, Osaki M, Kanda Y, Sugimoto Y, Yoshioka Y, Kosaka N, Takeshita F, Fujiwara T, Kawai A, Ito H, et al. PAI-1, a target gene of miR-143, regulates invasion and metastasis by upregulating MMP-13 expression of human osteosarcoma. Cancer Med. 2016;5(5):892–902.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Vlodavsky I, Beckhove P, Lerner I, Pisano C, Meirovitz A, Ilan N, Elkin M. Significance of heparanase in cancer and inflammation. Cancer Microenviron. 2012;5(2):115–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Zheng L, Jiang G, Mei H, Pu J, Dong J, Hou X, Tong Q. Small RNA interference-mediated gene silencing of heparanase abolishes the invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis of gastric cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Fan L, Wu Q, Xing X, Liu Y, Shao Z. Targeted silencing of heparanase gene by small interfering RNA inhibits invasiveness and metastasis of osteosarcoma cells. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2011;31(3):348–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Luo C, Yang Z, Wang L. Heparanase participates in the growth and invasion of human U-2OS osteosarcoma cells and its close relationship with hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in osteosarcoma. Neoplasma. 2010;57(6):562–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Todd JR, Ryall KA, Vyse S, Wong JP, Natrajan RC, Yuan Y, Tan AC, Huang PH. Systematic analysis of tumour cell-extracellular matrix adhesion identifies independent prognostic factors in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(39):62939–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Alfano M, Canducci F, Nebuloni M, Clementi M, Montorsi F, Salonia A. The interplay of extracellular matrix and microbiome in urothelial bladder cancer. Nature Reviews Urology. 2016;13(2):77–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Lim SB, Tan SJ, Lim WT, Lim CT. An extracellular matrix-related prognostic and predictive indicator for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1734.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Xu S, Xu H, Wang W, Li S, Li H, Li T, Zhang W, Yu X, Liu L. The role of collagen in cancer: from bench to bedside. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):309.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Liu Y, Abulimiti N, Wang C. Collagen triple Helix repeat containing 1 expression in osteosarcoma: a new predictor of prognosis. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2018;48(3):338–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Park EH, Kim S, Jo JY, Kim SJ, Hwang Y, Kim JM, Song SY, Lee DK, Koh SS. Collagen triple helix repeat containing-1 promotes pancreatic cancer progression by regulating migration and adhesion of tumor cells. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34(3):694–702.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    He M, Wang Z, Zhao J, Chen Y, Wu Y. COL1A1 polymorphism is associated with risks of osteosarcoma susceptibility and death. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(2):1297–305.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Shi K, Wang SL, Shen B, Yu FQ, Weng DF, Lin JH. Clinicopathological and prognostic values of fibronectin and integrin alphavbeta3 expression in primary osteosarcoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17(1):23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Na KY, Bacchini P, Bertoni F, Kim YW, Park YK. Syndecan-4 and fibronectin in osteosarcoma. Pathology. 2012;44(4):325–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Xiao Z, Wan J, Nur AA, Dou P, Mankin H, Liu T, Ouyang Z. Targeting CD44 by CRISPR-Cas9 in multi-drug resistant osteosarcoma cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;51(4):1879–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Kim CK, Oh S, Kim SJ, Leem SH, Heo J, Chung SH. Correlation of IGF1R expression with ABCG2 and CD44 expressions in human osteosarcoma. Genes Genomics. 2018;40(4):381–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Hamano Y, Kalluri R. Tumstatin, the NC1 domain of alpha3 chain of type IV collagen, is an endogenous inhibitor of pathological angiogenesis and suppresses tumor growth. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;333(2):292–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Wang Y, Yin RF, Teng JS. Tumstatin induces apoptosis and stimulates phosphorylation of p65NF-kappaB in human osteoblastic osteosarcoma Saos-2 cells. Oncol Rep. 2016;35(6):3403–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Xu M, Xu CX, Bi WZ, Song ZG, Jia JP, Chai W, Zhang LH, Wang Y. Effects of endostar combined multidrug chemotherapy in osteosarcoma. Bone. 2013;57(1):111–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Desgrosellier JS, Cheresh DA. Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(1):9–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Guo W, Giancotti FG. Integrin signalling during tumour progression. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5(10):816–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Intarajak T, Udomchaiprasertkul W, Bunyoo C, Yimnoon J, Soonklang K, Wiriyaukaradecha K, Lamlertthon W, Sricharunrat T, Chaiwiriyawong W, Siriphongpreeda B, et al. Genetic Aberration Analysis in Thai Colorectal Adenoma and Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma Patients by Whole-Exome Sequencing. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(7):977.

  140. 140.

    Li R, Shi Y, Zhao S, Shi T, Zhang G. NF-kappaB signaling and integrin-beta1 inhibition attenuates osteosarcoma metastasis via increased cell apoptosis. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;123:1035–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Shintani K, Matsumine A, Kusuzaki K, Morikawa J, Matsubara T, Wakabayashi T, Araki K, Satonaka H, Wakabayashi H, Iino T, et al. Decorin suppresses lung metastases of murine osteosarcoma. Oncol Rep. 2008;19(6):1533–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Duan Z, Choy E, Harmon D, Liu X, Susa M, Mankin H, Hornicek F. MicroRNA-199a-3p is downregulated in human osteosarcoma and regulates cell proliferation and migration. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10(8):1337–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Zhang L, Lyer AK, Yang X, Kobayashi E, Guo Y, Mankin H, Hornicek FJ, Amiji MM, Duan Z. Polymeric nanoparticle-based delivery of microRNA-199a-3p inhibits proliferation and growth of osteosarcoma cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:2913–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported, in part, by the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at UCLA. Dr. Cui is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (2018JJ3468), Science and Technology Innovation Program in Human Province (2018SK2077) and a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (201808430243).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception of the work: JC, ZC and ZD. Drafting of the article: JC and DD. Preparing figures: JC and FJH. Critical revision of the article: ZC and ZD. Final approval: JC, DD, FJH, ZC and ZD.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhiwei Chen or Zhenfeng Duan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors of this paper have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, J., Dean, D., Hornicek, F.J. et al. The role of extracelluar matrix in osteosarcoma progression and metastasis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 39, 178 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-020-01685-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Extracellular matrix
  • Osteosarcoma
  • Metastasis
  • Prognostic biomarker
  • Therapeutic target